Answer:
Explanation
Cohen's argument about gang-related stealing is a significant contribution to the sociological study of deviant behavior. In his book "Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang," Cohen argues that gang members engage in theft as a form of recreation, a means of demonstrating their skills and toughness, and a way to gain status and recognition within their peer group. This idea challenges the conventional wisdom that theft is motivated by economic need or poverty.
Regarding the idea of short-run hedonism, Cohen argues that adolescents, including gang members, tend to focus on immediate pleasure and gratification rather than long-term goals and consequences. This perspective has been influential in shaping our understanding of adolescent behavior and decision-making.
The group autonomy and attraction of gangs for adolescents can be attributed to several factors, including a sense of belonging, peer pressure, a desire for excitement and adventure, and the perceived benefits of gang membership, such as protection, money, and status. Parents and family members can help reestablish their relationships with gang-involved youth by maintaining open and non-judgmental communication, seeking professional support, and involving the youth in positive activities and alternatives to gang involvement.
Miller's theory of lower-class culture and its associated focal concerns is still relevant and widely studied today. According to Miller, lower-class individuals have unique focal concerns, such as toughness, smartness, excitement, fate, and autonomy, that are shaped by their experiences of poverty and marginalization. Whether or not one agrees with Miller's theory may depend on personal experiences and exposure to different socio-economic contexts.
The lack of a positive male role model, such as a father figure, can contribute to a male juvenile's decision to join a gang, as it may lead to a search for a sense of belonging and identity. Single mothers can take steps to minimize the likelihood of gang involvement by providing their children with positive male role models, such as mentors, coaches, or community leaders, and by engaging their children in activities and opportunities that promote positive development.
Miller's six focal concerns for lower-class adults and eight focal concerns for adolescents have been widely studied and debated in the sociological literature. The continued relevance of these focal concerns today suggests that they capture important dimensions of lower-class culture and experience. However, it is also possible that new focal concerns may have emerged in response to changes in society and the experiences of lower-class individuals over time.
Based on the theories and arguments discussed, it can be concluded that:
Gang-related theft is not solely motivated by economic need but can also be driven by social and cultural factors, such as a desire for recognition and status within a peer group.
Adolescents, including gang members, tend to focus on immediate pleasure and gratification, which can lead to risk-taking behavior.
Gangs can be attractive to adolescents for various reasons, including a sense of belonging, peer pressure, and the perceived benefits of gang membership. Parents and family members can play a crucial role in preventing gang involvement and reestablishing relationships with gang-involved youth.
Lower-class individuals have unique focal concerns shaped by their experiences of poverty and marginalization. The lack of a positive male role model can contribute to a male juvenile's decision to join a gang.
Miller's theory of lower-class culture and its associated focal concerns remains relevant and widely studied today, although it is possible that new focal concerns may have emerged over time.
It is important to note that these theories are not absolute and should be considered in light of other factors that may influence gang involvement and lower-class culture.
what caused texas's rate of incarceration to decline between 2013 and 2014?
The decline in Texas's rate of incarceration between 2013 and 2014 was caused by a combination of factors, including the implementation of alternative sentencing options for nonviolent offenders, the expansion of probation and parole programs, and a focus on rehabilitation and reentry support for incarcerated individuals.
Additionally, there was a decrease in crime rates during this time period, leading to fewer individuals being sentenced to prison. Overall, these efforts were aimed at reducing the state's reliance on incarceration as a form of punishment and addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
Texas has historically had one of the highest rates of incarceration in the United States, although in recent years its incarceration rate has decreased somewhat. According to the World Prison Brief, as of 2021, Texas has an incarceration rate of 587 per 100,000 people, which is higher than the national average of 352 per 100,000 people.
You can read more about incarceration at https://brainly.com/question/29383210
#SPJ11
The ________ consent of the member states was required for amendment of the Articles of Confederation.
The unanimous type of consent with all the member states was required for any amendment Articles of Confederation.
All 13 states would have to concur on a change because the Articles demanded unanimous assent for any amendments. That rule made it hard for the Articles to be modified after the war with Britain ended in 1783 because of the rivalry between the states. Samuel Adams, John Dickinson, Elbridge Gerry, Richard Henry Lee, John Hancock, Roger Sherman, and John Witherspoon were among the signatories.
The Articles established a grouping of independent states. On November 15, 1777, the Continental Congress ratified the Articles of Confederation, the country's first constitution. But it took until March 1st, 1781 for all thirteen states to ratify the Articles of Confederation.
Learn more about Confederation Visit: brainly.com/question/3148567
#SPJ4
state courts cannot have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts.true/false
True. State and federal courts cannot have concurrent jurisdiction over the same matter. State law problems may not be decided by federal trial courts inside a particular state, even when a federal court has jurisdiction.
The venue determines the best court location for a case. Two or more courts may have concurrent jurisdiction if all the courts have the right to hear the case. In particular, a wide range of proceedings are subject to concurrent jurisdiction in both state and federal courts in the United States.
When a crime begins in one state and is continued in one or more other jurisdictions, for example, concurrent jurisdiction occurs, allowing both state and federal courts to hear the case.
Learn more about jurisdiction Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
THREE POLICYMAKERS ARE DISCUSSING HOW TO ENSURE A JUST DISTRIBUTION OF A NATIONAL CAKE
Answer:
A just distribution of a national cake refers to the equitable distribution of resources and benefits within a country among its citizens. This concept is important because it ensures that everyone has equal access to opportunities and resources to improve their standard of living. Three policymakers discussing how to ensure a just distribution of a national cake may consider the following:
Redistribution of wealth: The policymakers may propose policies that involve redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor. This could be done through progressive taxation, subsidies, and transfer programs.
Providing basic services: The policymakers may focus on providing basic services like healthcare, education, and housing to all citizens, regardless of their economic status.
Improving access to job opportunities: The policymakers may aim to create job opportunities in underdeveloped regions to reduce the gap between rich and poor.
Encouraging entrepreneurship: The policymakers may also encourage entrepreneurship and provide support to small businesses, particularly in rural areas.
Promoting equality: The policymakers may promote equality of opportunities, including education, healthcare, and employment.
Explanation:
By considering these and other related measures, the policymakers may ensure that the national cake is distributed justly, leading to a more equitable and sustainable future for all citizens.
ALLEN
Answer:citizien promotion
Explanation:
1. Questions: a. What was the primary goal of the Catholic church and monarchy of Spain, Portugal, and England? What did they have to gain? b. What are the 7 laws? c. What are the principles of life as quoted by Shawnee Chief Tecumseh, which of these 7 Laws and principles do you believe hold the most efficacy in your life?
The primary goal of the Catholic Church and monarchies of Spain, Portugal, and England was to propagate Christianity, promote their own unique faith, and strengthen their political and economic dominance.
The seven commandments of the Catholic Church were to respect God and the Catholic Church, regard the Congregation and the Lords, act with good cause and modesty, keep the Congregation's guidelines, show love for consecrated objects, notice the Sabbath as a blessed day, and be consistent with one's mate.
Shawnee Boss Tecumseh's everyday routine goals were to regard all experiencing things, live as one with nature, maintain one's statement, regard the convictions of others, act with boldness and honesty, and try to develop a superior future.
Learn more about monarchies:
https://brainly.com/question/1430440
#SPJ4
the 1876 constitution was so well written, it is rare for anyone to ask if we might need a new one.truefalse
It is false to say that the 1876 constitution was so well written, it is rare for anyone to ask if we might need a new one.
Drafted stealthily by agents to the Constitutional Convention the late spring of 1876, this four-page report, endorsed on September 17, 1876, laid out the public authority of the US.
The Government Show assembled in the State House (Freedom Lobby) in Philadelphia on May 14, 1876, to reexamine the Articles of Confederation. Since the designations from just two states were at first present, the individuals dismissed from one day to another until a majority of seven states was gotten on May 25.
Through conversation and discussion it turned out to be clear by mid-June that, as opposed to revise the current Articles, the Show would draft an altogether new casing of government. All through the mid year, in shut meetings, the representatives discussed, and redrafted the articles of the new Constitution.
To know more about constitution,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/28857951
#SPJ4
how national powers and state powers are most likely to conflict with each other?
The most probable time for national and state authorities to clash is when there is a disagreement over who has what authority and obligations. Conflicts may occur, for instance, when the federal
When there are disagreements on how power and responsibility are distributed between the two levels of government, conflicts between national and state authorities result. In federal systems, these disputes may result from differences over the extent of governmental authority or from varying constitutional interpretations. Conflicts may also occur if the federal government passes laws or policies that restrict state autonomy or if states defy federal directives. Taxation, trade regulation, and resource distribution are frequently a source of conflict. These issues frequently need to be resolved by negotiation, litigation, or political compromise, and they may have a big impact on the distribution of power between the federal and state governments.
Learn more about Conflicts here:
https://brainly.com/question/17085630
#SPJ4
what amendment gives the right to not self-incriminate?
Fifth-amendment gives the right to not self-incriminate. This act creates several constitutional rights.
In addition to the right against self-incriminate, the arrangements of the Fifth amendment give numerous significant shields to Americans, including the option to stay quiet while in police authority, writs of habeas corpus, and twofold danger assurance.
The Constitution gives this right, where: "[No person]… will be constrained in any crook body of evidence to be an observer against himself… " Nonetheless, likewise with most other sacred privileges, it is dependent upon translation by the courts and frequently moves savage discussion.
The right against self-incrimination is established in the Puritans' refusal to help out questioners in seventeenth century Britain. Some were forced or tormented into admitting their strict connection and were viewed as blameworthy on the off chance that they stayed quiet. English regulation conceded its residents the right against self-implication during the 1600s, when an insurgency laid out more prominent parliamentary power.
To know more about amendment ,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/18368933
#SPJ4
is there a statute of limitations on property liens?
On property liens, a judgement lien is valid for ten years. A property lien is a formal claim made against assets that gives the holder access to the asset in the event that a debt is not paid.
A county records office or a state agency must both file and approve a property lien. The property owner is then informed in writing with specific terms that action has been taken to reclaim the property.
Creditors may use property liens in a variety of circumstances. A legal claim to particular assets that has been authorized by the courts is known as a property lien. A county records office or state agency is where a creditor must apply and be granted permission for a property lien.
To learn more about property liens, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/30024963
#SPJ4
how fairly can a national cake be shared?
The national cake should be shared in a way that benefits all citizens, regardless of their social, economic, or political status.
National Cake and how it can be shared fairlyThe fairness of sharing a national cake depends on various factors, including the size of the said cake, the number of people who need to share it, and the distribution of resources and wealth in the country. Ideally, a national cake should be shared in a way that benefits all citizens, regardless of their social, economic, or political status.
One approach to sharing the national cake fairly is to use progressive taxation, where the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than those with lower incomes. This helps to ensure that the burden of supporting the country's infrastructure, services, and programs is shared more equitably. Additionally, the government can invest in programs that support the most vulnerable populations, such as education, healthcare, and affordable housing, to help reduce inequality and provide opportunities for all citizens to succeed.
However, the reality is that in many countries, the national cake is not shared fairly.
Some factors impeding on the fair sharing include:
Corruptionpolitical favoritismand economic inequalityThese can all contribute to a situation where certain groups receive a disproportionate share of the national wealth. In such cases, it is important for citizens to engage in activism and advocacy, to hold their elected officials accountable and push for reforms that promote fairness and equality.
Learn more about corruption here https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
what is the system where the national government shares power with state governments?
Federalism is the system where the national government shares power with state governments.
Federalism is the system of government which divides the power or responsibilities of statutes between the center and the state or other regional bodies. Federalism guarantees sovereignty and in United States both the center and the state enjoy sovereignty. All these power are conferred to the government by the constitution itself, the constitution also protects these divisions from the legislature in order to maintain harmony and proper distribution of powers at all levels of the government. The three branches of the government the legislature, executive and the judiciary work with division of powers and each of these branches are governed by the constitution.
To know more about "Federalism" visit-
brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
You have been selected to lead a team to resolve an age-old land dispute between two families. Family 'A' thinks Family 'B' is not entitled to a portion of the land because they are not the biological children of the ancestor whose land is in dispute. But Family 'B' disagrees because they think they were adopted by the ancestor and are therefore her children also. From our discussions on open-textured and well-defined terms, verbal vs. substantive disagreement, write an essay
The family disagreement is substantive given its current character. This is so that it is clear that there is a disagreement over property inheritance, not a verbal one.
What is the concept of the passage?
The difference in the nature of their relationship—whether they are adopted or biological children—is the root of the conflict. To bring about peace between the two parties, they can either turn to the ancestors' wills or go before the land's court to get a judgment that both sides can accept.
One of the potential difficulties is getting everyone to a common location for an amicable and unbiased conversation. Since there doesn't seem to be any positive ties between them, it is also expected that their differences will persist even after this conflict is settled.
Thus, The family disagreement is substantive given its current character.
For more information about concept of the passage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28028989
#SPJ9
In response to growing concerns about the overcrowding of landfills with scrap metal, Congress passed a statute requiring all unwanted vehicles to be disposed of at federally licensed auto-recycling facilities. These facilities were able to recycle more components of vehicles than most other recycling facilities. However, due to the high operating costs of these facilities, the cost of disposing the vehicles was much higher than the cost of disposing them at general purpose recycling facilities. A state wants to dispose of its fleet of decommissioned trucks at a state-operated recycling facility. However, this facility is not federally licensed. Is the state permitted to dispose of its decommissioned trucks at the state-operated facility?
Answers:
No, because the federal statute was passed pursuant to Congress's power to legislate for the general welfare.
No, because the federal statute regulates interstate commerce.
Yes, because the market-participant exception applies.
Yes, because there is a presumption against preemption in an area governed by the state's police power.
No, the state is not permitted to dispose of its decommissioned trucks at the state-operated facility because the federal statute requires all unwanted vehicles to be disposed of at federally licensed auto-recycling facilities.
The federal statute was enacted under Congress's jurisdiction to legislate for the general welfare, and it governs the disposal of unwanted automobiles in order to address concerns about landfill congestion. The market-participant exception, which permits a state to favour its own products or services while acting as a market player, does not applicable in this case because the state is operating as a regulator rather than a market participant. Furthermore, because the federal Act was passed under the Trade Clause, which provides Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce, there is no presumption against preemption in an area covered by the state's police power.
For such more question on federally:
https://brainly.com/question/4503841
#SPJ4
Laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of othersa)criminalb)civilc)internationald)military
Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
So, option A is the correct answer.
Criminal laws regulate the criminal acts of the individuals, groups or associations. These criminal acts are addressed in the statutes. It can also be termed as penal laws because the criminal acts will lead to the punishment and fines.
It includes harmful or criminal acts such as theft, threatening a person about his/her body or property, robbery, defamation and many more.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
To know more about theft, click here: brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ4
____temporarily settled the national debate over whether new states would permit or prohibit slavery
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily settled the national debate over whether new states would permit or prohibit slavery.
The legislation of Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a non-slave state at the same time and the 36'30” line was drawn to establish division regarding slavery for the remainder of the Louisiana Territory., so as not to upset the balance between slave and free states in the nation. It was step to outlaw slavery in a very large region. It is an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states. But it failed to resolve the problem of slavery and its impact on future.
To know more about "Missouri Compromise" visit-
brainly.com/question/18367808
#SPJ4
How the case of US v. Virginia impacts you as a high school student. HELPPPPP
Answer: Please mark me blrainliest because it took alot to do this look in explanation.
Explanation:
The case of US v. Virginia, also known as the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) case, has far-reaching implications for high school students, particularly for those who are interested in pursuing careers in fields that were traditionally male-dominated, such as military leadership. In this case, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the state of Virginia could not maintain a male-only admission policy for VMI, a public military college, because it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This ruling sent a powerful message that public institutions must provide equal educational opportunities to all, regardless of gender.
This case has important implications for high school students because it reinforces the principle of equal education and the right to equal opportunities in higher education. High school students who are considering pursuing careers in fields that have traditionally been male-dominated can be inspired by this case to pursue their goals and dreams, knowing that they have the right to equal educational opportunities. The case of US v. Virginia also serves as a reminder that individuals have the power to effect change through activism and legal action, and that progress can be made through the pursuit of justice and equality.
What do election mean?
a unitary system of government is characterized by?
Characteristics of a unitary system of government are - Centralization of Powers, Single Government, Uniformity of Laws, No distribution of powers, No conflict of authority, Flexible Constitution.
Unitary system of government is opposite to the federal system of government. In the unitary system all powers are in the hands of the central government but in the federal system powers are divided between the central and the state government.
As there is only one authority in the unitary system the conflict between the different authorities doesn't occur and also it makes the amendment process of constitution very flexible, here the ratification by the states is not required.
To know more about Unitary, click here: brainly.com/question/386090
#SPJ4
is there a statute of limitations on child support?
The ability to enforce a child support order is not subject to any statute of limitations.
Prior to 1993, the statute of limitations governing support orders was governed by the previous California Civil Code section 4833. The old code allowed a warrant of execution to be used to execute a child support or family support judgement without prior court approval up to five years after the kid turned majority age, and then only for amounts that were up to ten years past due.
The law in California was changed in 1992 to allow spousal and family support orders to be upheld until they are paid. Therefore, until they are paid in full, all child support orders are still valid.
To learn more about child support orders, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/22691960
#SPJ4
Xavier Jones was injured in an accident caused by another driver who did not have insurance. Xavier's medical expenses would be covered by:
In the situation wherein Xavier Jones was injured in an accident caused due to another uninsured driver, then the medical expenses of Xavier would be under the cover of the uninsured motorist protection.
The uninsured person may be taken into general understanding as the person who does not hold any insurance against his or her name, and has not subscribed to any insurance policy, with or without payment of insurance premium. The person at loss would not be covered by the uninsured person, but a protection regarding the same is already made to cover the medical outgoes.
Learn more about uninsured here:
https://brainly.com/question/24315960
#SPJ4
These theorists would be most interested in studying how objects (like a cop's badge or gun) play a role in impression management. Question 6 options: a) Functionalist b) Symbolic interactionist c) Feminist d) Conflict theorist
A symbolic interactionist would be most concerned with the parts these objects play in impression management. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization.
According to the symbolic interactionist was the concerned of objects play in impression management. The symbolic interactionist was the understanding of the human action and society.
As a result, the significance of the symbolic interactionist are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on management, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ1
An advantage of the separation of ownership from management in corporations is that the company can raise money from investors but the investors:____________
Businesses can raise capital from investors without those investors getting involved in day-to-day management, which is one advantage of corporations having separate ownership and management.
What are investors?An investor is a person who invests money with the hope of making a profit or gaining an advantage in the future (interest).
The majority of the time, the investor purchases some kind of property using these assigned funds.
Equity, debt, securities, real estate, infrastructure, money, commodities, tokens, derivatives like put and call options, futures, and forwards are a few examples of investment types.
One benefit of corporations having ownership and management distinct from one another is that businesses can raise capital from investors without those investors getting involved in day-to-day management.
Therefore, businesses can raise capital from investors without those investors getting involved in day-to-day management, which is one advantage of corporations having separate ownership and management.
Know more about investors here:
https://brainly.com/question/25311149
#SPJ1
Which of these descriptions is consistent with the federal system?Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters. A confederal system of government. The colonies had no formal venue for influencing parliamentary policy. Confederal system
This description is consistent with a federal system of government. In a federal system, each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters, and the states or provinces have a formal venue for influencing national policy.
This structure allows for a balance of power between the central government and the states and provinces, which can have their own constitutions, laws, and elected officials. The federal government typically has authority over matters of national importance, such as foreign policy and defense, while the states and provinces have authority over matters of local importance, such as education and taxation.
To learn more about federal system of government link is here
brainly.com/question/30154201
#SPJ4
what happens if you unknowingly deposit a fake check
If you deposit a fake check, you could be held liable for the money on it. You can also be responsible for any losses the bank incurs as a result of your deposit.
What Happens If A Fake Check Is Accidentally Deposited?
If you have a bank account, an overdraft fee may probably be charged. The bank will charge you for the amount the fake check overdrew. An overdraft may cost hundreds of dollars.You might lose your job if this causes you to be fired.It will affect your credit history when you're ready to apply for new loans and mortgages.You may also be required to pay back the person who wrote the check if they lost money as a result of your depositing a fake check into their account. Restitution might be expensive to repay in order to repair the relationship with that person.To learn more about overdraft fees visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1739416
#SPJ4
the chief justice of the supreme court who ruled in favor of the cherokee nation was?
The verdict in favor of the Cherokee people was given by Chief Justice John Marshall of the Supreme Court. Major Ridge, a well-known Cherokee politician, served as the leader of this purported "Treaty Party" in favor of deportation.
John Ross, the senior Cherokee chief, led the majority of the Cherokees who rejected relocating. For approximately forty years, John Ross led the Cherokee People as their chief, and it was during this time that the tribe went through some of its most difficult circumstances.
His primary role during the bitter factional struggle over the decision to settle in Indian Territory in the 1830s is what made him most famous (Oklahoma). The US Supreme Court ruled the Cherokee Nation to be sovereign in Georgia.
Learn more about Cherokee Visit: brainly.com/question/2297390
#SPJ4
the pendleton act required appointees to public office to
The Pendleton act required appointees to public office to take public examinations.
The Pendleton act was adopted in the year 1883 as a reform in civil services in United States. The Pendleton Act was enacted to appoint employees in federal government jobs on the basis of merit and the selection of these government employees through competitive exams instead of patronage. Formally know as The Pendleton civil services reform act in United States passed by the 47th united states congress and signed by the president Chester A. Arthur. The act made it illegal to fire these employees for political reasons and political pressure. Initially it covered only smaller percentage of federal jobs which are protected by such a law but later on with time and understanding to was extended to major portion of federal government jobs.
To know more about "Pendleton act" visit-
brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ4
Under what conditions did the US Supreme Court rule that a juvenile can be held in preventive detention?
The Supreme Court affirmed a "preventive detention" rule, holding that judges may decide to detain juvenile defendants in jail if they pose a high risk of committing a crime while they are awaiting trial.
What is preventive detention?
The legal situation surrounding preventive detention is a matter of personal freedom and, by extension, a matter of human rights.
Taking someone into custody who has not yet committed a crime but who the authorities believe poses a threat to law and order is known as preventive detention.In Alijav v. District Magistrate, Dhanbad, the Supreme Court ruled that while preventative detention does not involve an offence, criminal procedures do involve penalising a person for an offence they had committed.The Court ruled in Ankul Chandra Pradhan v. Union of India that the goal of preventative detention is not to punish the detenue but rather to stop them from doing anything that may jeopardize the security of the state.To learn more about preventive detention visit;
https://brainly.com/question/4144723
#SPJ4
part ii offenses do not include group of a) vagrancy. b) dui. c) gambling.
Part II offences do not include arson. (Option D).
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program has classified crimes according to their seriousness into two groups. Part I offences refer to group of serious crimes that happen on a regular basis and are likely to be reported to law enforcement. These offences include murder, assault, arson, larceny, robbery, identity theft, etc.
On the other hand, Part II offences are less serious crimes that are punishable by a fine of less than $5,000 or a prison term of less than six months. These include offences such as gambling, DUI, vagrancy, fraud, substance abuse, vandalism, disorderly conduct, embezzlement, etc. Hence, arson does not belong to the group of part II offences.
Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: Part II offences do not include a) vagrancy, b) DUI, c) gambling, d) arson.
Learn more about Part I offenses:
https://brainly.com/question/28488489
#SPJ11
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
Option 1 is Correct. Because Congress has given the executive arm of the government authority, the statute is not constitutional.
A law passed by Congress that included $20 million was intended to fund a coalition of independent, non-profit water organizations in response to the rising cost of water. The consortium's goal was to solve the myriad problems that were driving up water prices and creating shortages all throughout the country while also funding research into potential remedies.
The act indicated that the consortium's leftover assets would be used for infrastructure upgrades, and it provided specific criteria for the kind of research it should conduct and the amount of money it may spend. In addition, the act gave the Secretary of the Interior the authority to choose which water groups would be included in the consortium.
Learn more about constitutional Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
1. No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
2. No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
3. Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
4. Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
what must a prosecutor prove when the law requires mens rea?
Each element of the offense must be shown beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecutor. Anything that is assumed cannot be demonstrated, making it an appealable mistake.
The prosecution must establish both an actus reus—a physical act—and a mens rea—a state of mind—to commit the crime—for the defendant to be found guilty. Mens rea refers to the defendant's state of mind at the time the actus reus was committed. The mens rea requirements for certain crimes vary. The responsibility to back up your statements with adequate evidence is known as the burden of proof. For instance, if someone asserts that ghosts exist, they are required to present evidence to back up their claim.
To learn more about prosecutors visit;
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ4
