Step-by-step explanation:
Cost of 2 pack = 0.95
Cost of 1 pack = 0.95 ÷ 2 = 0.475
Unit price = 0.475
how do you add 9 1/6 + 2 1/12
Answer:
11 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
first make the fractions equal. So 9 1/6 would be 9 2/12 so that we canadd them together.
9 2/12 + 2 1/12 = 11 3/12
but u can simplify the answer so itll be 11 1/4
[tex]answer = 11 \ \frac{3}{12} \\ solution \\ 9 \ \frac{1}{6} + 2 \ \frac{1}{12} \\ = \frac{55}{6} + \frac{25}{12} \\ = \frac{55 \times 2 + 25}{12} \\ = \frac{110 + 25}{12} \\ = \frac{135}{12} \\ = 11 \ \ \frac{3}{12} \\ hope \: it \: helps[/tex]
The radius of the large sphere is double the radius of the
small sphere.
How many times is the volume of the large sphere than the
small sphere?
02
O4
6
O 6
O 8
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
just do the comparation
Vb : Vs
b for big and s for small
4/3 π rb³ : 4/3 π rs³ (since there are 4/3 and π on both side, we can eliminate them so)
Vb : Vs = rb³ : rs³
Vb : Vs = (2rs)³ : rs³
Vb : Vs = 8rs³ : rs³ (delete the r³ on both side)
Vb : Vs = 8 : 1
so Vb is 8 times larger in volume than the small one
An item is regularly priced at 40$. It is. On sale for 30% off the regular price. How much (in dollars) is discounted from the regular price?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
12$
Use z scores to compare the given values. The tallest living man at one time had a height of 252 cm. The shortest living man at that time had a height of 79.2 cm. Heights of men at that time had a mean of 176.74 cm and a standard deviation of 8.06 cm. Which of these two men had the height that was moreâ extreme?
Answer:
The more extreme height was the case for the shortest living man at that time (12.1017 standard deviation units below the population's mean) compare with the tallest living man (at that time) that was 9.3374 standard deviation units above the population's mean.
Step-by-step explanation:
To answer this question, we need to use standardized values, and we can obtain them using the formula:
[tex] \\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex] [1]
Where
x is the raw score we want to standardize.[tex] \\ \mu[/tex] is the population's mean.[tex] \\ \sigma[/tex] is the population standard deviation.A z-score "tells us" the distance from [tex] \\ \mu[/tex] in standard deviation units, and a positive value indicates that the raw score is above the mean and a negative that the raw score is below the mean.
In a normal distribution, the more extreme values are those with bigger z-scores, above and below the mean. We also need to remember that the normal distribution is symmetrical.
Heights of men at that time had:
[tex] \\ \mu = 176.74[/tex] cm.[tex] \\ \sigma = 8.06[/tex] cmLet us see the z-score for each case:
Case 1: The tallest living man at that time
The tallest man had a height of 252 cm.
Using [1], we have (without using units):
[tex] \\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex] \\ z = \frac{252 - 176.74}{8.06}[/tex]
[tex] \\ z = \frac{75.26}{8.06}[/tex]
[tex] \\ z = 9.3374[/tex]
That is, the tallest living man was 9.3374 standard deviation units above the population's mean.
Case 2: The shortest living man at that time
The shortest man had a height of 79.2 cm.
Following the same procedure as before, we have:
[tex] \\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex] \\ z = \frac{79.2 - 176.74}{8.06}[/tex]
[tex] \\ z = \frac{-97.54}{8.06}[/tex]
[tex] \\ z = -12.1017[/tex]
That is, the shortest living man was 12.1017 standard deviation units below the population's mean (because of the negative value for the standardized value.)
The normal distribution is symmetrical (as we previously told). The height for the shortest man was at the other extreme of the normal distribution in [tex] \\ 12.1017 - 9.3374 = 2.7643[/tex] standard deviation units more than the tallest man.
Then, the more extreme height was the case for the shortest living man (12.1017 standard deviation units below the population's mean) compare with the tallest man that was 9.3374 standard deviation units above the population's mean.
If the ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5 and that of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and the sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years, what is the age difference between oldest the youngest?
Answer:
48
Step-by-step explanation:
Esinam shere a common ratio hence,
the lcm of 3 and 5 is 15
Kissi:Esinam= 9:15 and Esinam:Lariba=15:25
Combining; 9:15:25
Let x be the ages such that,
Kissi=9x and Esinam=15x and Lariba=25x
9x+15x+25x=147
49x=147
x=3
Youngest; Kissi=9x=9(3)=27
Oldest; Lariba=25x=25(3)=75
Difference 75-27=48
tan 12 = 22/x
Please help !!! Last answer says 4.7
Answer:
103.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply x on both sides
xtan12 = 22
Now divide tan12 to isolate x
x = (22) / (tan(12))
Now we know that calculator should be in degree mode because the answer choices do not have the radian mode answer. When your calculator is in Degree mode and you calculate this value you get approximately 103.5
The value of x if tan 12 = 22/x is 103.5
Given the trigonometric expression:
tan 12 = 22/x
We need to get the value of "x"
Cross multiply
x tan12 = 22
x = 22/tan12
x = 22/0.2126
x = 103.529
Hence the value of x if tan 12 = 22/x is 103.5
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/25618616
In △ ABC, ∠C = 57° and ∠A = 103°. Side CB= 6.5 cm. Draw △ A′B′C′ under the same condition as △ ABC. Leave all construction marks as evidence of your work, and label all side and angle measurements(use text box). What can you conclude about △ ABC and △ A′B′C′? Justify your response.
Answer:
ΔA'B'C' is congruent to ΔABC
Step-by-step explanation:
See attached for the construction of ΔA'B'C'. (The vertices are labeled ABC.)
We computed angle B to be ...
∠B = 180° -∠A -∠C
∠B = 180° -103° -57° = 20°
We constructed segment BC of length 6.5. Then we constructed angles of 20° and 57° from B and C, respectively. The location where the rays from those angles cross is point A', and the angle there is 103°, as required.
__
ΔA'B'C' is congruent to ΔABC by the ASA congruence postulate.
Fernando bought 8 pints of milk. How many fluid ounces of milk did Fernando buy? A. 16 fluid ounces B. 64 fluid ounces C. 128 fluid ounces D. 256 fluid ounces
Answer:
C.
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 16 ounces in a pint. 8 * 16 = 128
1. If the ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5 and that of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and
the sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years, what is the age difference between oldest the
youngest?
Ans: years
2. The HCF of two numbers is 11, and their L.C.M is 368. If one number is 64, then the other
number is ….
Answer:
1) 48 years.
2) Question incorrect.
11 isn't a factor of 64, and 368 isn't a multiple of 64. 11 also isn't a factor of 368, hence, it would be impossible to find the unknown second number with all of these false information in the question.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the ages of Kissi, Esinam and Lariba be x, y and z respectively.
Ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5
x:y = 3:5
(x/y) = (3/5)
5x = 3y
x = (3y/5) (eqn 1)
Ratio of the ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5
y:z = 3:5
(y/z) = (3/5)
5y = 3z
z = (5y/3) (eqn 2)
The sum of their 3 ages is 147
x + y + z = 147 (eqn 3)
Substituting the values of x and z from eqn 1 and 2 into eqn 3, we have
(3y/5) + y + (5y/3) = 147
(49y/15) = 147
y = (147×15/49) = 45.
x = (3y/5) = (3×45/5) = 27
z = (5y/3) = (5×45/3) = 75
The ages of Kissi, Esinam and Lariba are then 27, 45 and 75 respectively.
The difference in the ages of the oldest amf the youngest is thus, 75 - 27 = 48 years.
2) This question seems to be faulty and incorrect as 11 isn't a factor of 64, and 368 isn't a multiple of 64. 11 also isn't a factor of 368, hence, it would be impossible to find the unknown second number with all of these false information in the question.
Hope this Helps!!!
solve for x
x/9=3
whats x
Answer:
x = 27
Step-by-step explanation:
x/9 = 3
Multiply each side by 9
x/9 * 9 = 3*9
x = 27
Answer:
27
Step-by-step explanation:
x/9= 3
Carry over the 9 and make x the subject.
x= 3*9
x= 27
Therefore x is 27.
To check if the answer is correct, replace the x with the value of what it is in brackets. The value of x is 27.
(27)/9= 3
= 27/9
= 3
We got back the 3 so that means the answer is correct
The lengths of pregnancies in a small rural village are normally distributed with a mean of 267 days and a standard deviation of 15 days. A distribution of values is normal with a mean of 267 and a standard deviation of 15. What percentage of pregnancies last beyond 246 days? P(X > 246 days) =
Answer:
91.92% of pregnancies last beyond 246 days
Step-by-step explanation:
When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.
In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
In this question, we have that:
[tex]\mu = 267, \sigma = 15[/tex]
What percentage of pregnancies last beyond 246 days?
We have to find 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 246. So
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{246 - 267}{15}[/tex]
[tex]Z = -1.4[/tex]
[tex]Z = -1.4[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0808
1 - 0.0808 = 0.9192
91.92% of pregnancies last beyond 246 days
The first digit in any number must be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 because we do not write numbers such as 15 as 015. While it is reasonable to think that for most real-life data each digit occurs with equal frequency so that each digit 1, 2, ..., 9 has probability 1/9 of being the first digit, this is not true. It is a surprising phenomenon that in many naturally occurring numbers and web-based data the first digit has a probability distribution known as Benford's law.
Benford's law, also called the first-digit law, states that in lists of numbers from many (but not all) real-life sources of data, the leading digit is distributed in a specific, non-uniform way.
Specifically, for d = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Benford's law states P(first digit is d) = log_10(1+(1/d)) . The distribution of the first digit according to Benford's law, calculated to 3 decimal places, is shown in the table below.
Benford's law
First Digit X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Probability .301 .176 .125 .097 .079 .067 .058 .051 .046
Benford's Law and the Equally Likely Model benford equally likely
The law is named after physicist Frank Benford, who stated it in 1938, although it had been previously stated by Simon Newcomb in 1881. A surprising variety of data from the natural sciences, social affairs, and business obeys Benford's law.
This result has been found to apply to a wide variety of data sets, including electricity bills, street addresses, stock prices, population numbers, death rates, lengths of rivers, physical and mathematical constants, and processes described by power laws (which are very common in nature).
Numbers that are assigned, such as social security numbers and zip codes, or data with a fixed maximum, such as deductible contributions to individual retirement accounts, or randomly generated numbers, do not follow Benford's law.
The figure below shows how the distribution of the first digit of various naturally occurring and web-based data compares with Benford's law.
benford natural data web data
Figure information. Earthquakes: depth in km of 248,915 quakes, 1989-2009; source National Earthquake Information Center, United States Geological Survey. Minnesota lakes: size in acres of approx. 1100 lakes; source Wikipedia. Births: number of births in each county of the United States (approximately 3200), 2010; source: US Census Bureau. Diggs: total number of diggs for each of the top 1000 diggers at digg.com; source: socialblade.com.
Question 1:
(1a). What is the expected value of the first digit when the first digit follows Benford's law?
expected value (Use 3 decimal places).
(1b). What is the expected value of the first digit when the possible first digits are equally likely?
expected value (Use 3 decimal places).
(1c). What is the standard deviation of the first digit when the first digit follows Benford's Law?
Answer:
0.699
Step-by-step explanation:
got it on khan academy, should get brainliest thanks
Dominique is thinking about buying a hosue for 286000
Answer:
is this supposed to be a question?
Answer:
yah so
Step-by-step explanation:
Help, please. I dont really understand
Answer:
We can eliminate the second and third options because marking something up doesn't result in a number less than the original. Since we are told to select 3 options and there are 3 answer choices left we select the first, fourth, and fifth statements.
Write an equation of a line that contains the following two points in slope intercept form
(-2,4) (3,-1)
Answer:
y = -x + 2
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope intercept form equation of this line can be written like this :
y = my + p ; where m is the slope and p is the y intercept.
[tex]m = \frac{-1-4}{3-(-2)} = \frac{-5}{5} =-1[/tex]
then the equation becomes y = -x + p
(-2,4) is a point of the line means 4 = -(-2) + p
then p = 4 - 2 = 2
finally, y = -x + 2
a courtroom spectator merely looks at the defendant and says, “He’s guilty, i tell you.”
Answer:
hes lyin prolly
Step-by-step explanation:
Round the following number to the nearest thousand 2385
By rounding of the following number to the nearest thousand is 2000.
What is rounding a number to some specific place?Rounding some number to a specific value is making its value simpler (therefore losing accuracy), mostly done for better readability or accessibility.
'
Rounding to some place keeps it accurate on the left side of that place but rounded or sort of like trimmed from the right in terms of exact digits.
Round the following number to the nearest thousand
2385
= 2000
Thus, by rounding of the following number to the nearest thousand is 2000.
Learn more about rounding numbers here:
https://brainly.com/question/1285054
#SPJ2
Marcus is trying to find 4 5/6-1 3/6. His work shown. What is Marcus's mistake?
Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4-1=3
Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6-3/6=2/6
Step 3: Subtract the differences. 3-2/6=2 4/6
Answer:
Step 3
Step-by-step explanation:
The mistake was made in Step 3.
Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4 - 1 = 3
Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6 - 3/6 = 2/6
After Step 2, He should have added them instead of subtracting them:
3 + 2/6 = 3 2/6
So, step 3 was his mistake.
Answer:step 3
Step-by-step explanation: he should have added
the graph of f (x) shown below has the same shape as the graph of G (x) equals x ^ 4 but it is shifted 4 units to the right what is the equation
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
shifting 4 units to the right means that the new root = old root + 4
what that means is that the equation must have a transformation such that it equates to 0 with the root being 4 larger.
the root/vertex for x^4 is at x=0
we want the root to be at x=4
so that means we can subtract 4 from x
and get (x-4)^4
2 Points
Which is a kingdom?
O A. Prokarya
B. Protista
C. Mammalia
O D. Chordata
Answer:
Protista
Step-by-step explanation:
Archaebacteria.
Eubacteria.
Protista.
Fungi.
Plantae.
Animalia.
These are the 6 kingdoms
Solve Ixl >-9
No solution
All reals
(X|X<-9 or X>9)
Answer:
all reals
Step-by-step explanation:
all reals as |x| >= 0 for every x real
so |x| > -9 is always true
Use the distributive property to remove the parentheses .
-8(y-v-3)
Answer:
-8y +8v +24
Step-by-step explanation:
-8(y-v-3)
Multiply each term inside the parentheses by -8
-8y -v*-8 -3*-8
-8y +8v +24
___________________________________
Hey!!!
solution,
-8(y-v-3)
= -8y+8v+24
_________________________________
Here,
You have to remember these things:
(+)*(+)=(+)(+)*(-)=(-)(-)*(-)=(+)(-)*(+)=(-)Hope it helps.
Good luck on your assignment
A fair spinner has 11 equal sections: 3 red, 4 blue and 4 green. It is spun twice. What is the probability of getting the same colour twice?
Answer:
The probability of getting the same colour twice is approximately 34%.
Step-by-step explanation:
The probability of getting each color is:
P(x=red) = 3/11 P(x=blue) = 4/11P(x=green) = 4/11Then, we can calculate the probability of getting the color red twice as:
[tex]P(x_1=R;x_2=R)=P(x=R)^2=(3/11)^2=9/121[/tex]
We have to repeat this for the color blue and green:
[tex]P(x_1=B;x_2=B)=P(x=B)^2=(4/11)^2=16/121\\\\P(x_1=G;x_2=G)=P(x=G)^2=(4/11)^2=16/121[/tex]
Then, the probability of getting the same color twice in two spins can be calculated as:
[tex]P=P(x_1=R;x_2=R)+P(x_1=B;x_2=B)+P(x_1=G;x_2=G)=\\\\P=9/121+16/121+16/121\\\\P=41/121\approx0.34[/tex]
How many seconds in oneday
Answer:
there are 86,400 seconds in one day
A statistician calculates that 9% of Americans are vegetarians. If the statistician is correct, what is the probability that the proportion of vegetarians in a sample of 471 Americans would be greater than 8%
Answer:
The probability that the proportion of vegetarians in a sample of 471 Americans would be greater than 8% is P=0.776.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to calculate a probability that a sample of n=471 has a proportion greater than 8%, given that the population proportion is 9%.
First, we have to calculate the parameters of the sampling distribution of the proportions:
[tex]\hat{p}=p=0.09\\\\\\\sigma_{\hat{p}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.09\cdot 0.91}{471}}=0.0132[/tex]
Now, we can calculate the probability using the z-score:
[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\hat{p}}{\sigma_{\hat{p}}}=\dfrac{0.08-0.09}{0.0132}=\dfrac{-0.01}{0.0132}=-0.7576[/tex]
Then, the probability is:
[tex]P(p>0.08)=P(z>-0.7576)=0.776[/tex]
Activity trackers are electronic devices that people wear to record physical activity. Researchers wanted to estimate the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for people working in New York City who wear such trackers. A random sample of 61 people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker was selected. The number of steps taken on a typical workday for each person in the sample was recorded. The mean was 9,797 steps and the standard deviation was 2,313 steps.
a. Construct and interpret a 99 percent confidence interval for the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker.
b. A wellness director at a company in New York City wants to investigate whether it is unusual for one person working in the city who wears an activity tracker to record approximately 8,500 steps on a typical workday. Is it appropriate to use the confidence interval found in part (a) to conduct the investigation.
Answer:
a) The 99% confidence interval for the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker is (9,009, 10,585).
We are 95% confident that the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker is within 9,009 and 10,585 steps.
b) No, we can not use the confidence interval to estimate the probability of individual values. It can onlybe used to make inference about the population mean.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) We have to calculate a 99% confidence interval for the mean.
The population standard deviation is not known, so we have to estimate it from the sample standard deviation and use a t-students distribution to calculate the critical value.
The sample mean is M=9,797.
Ths sample standard deviation is s=2,313.
The sample size is N=61.
When σ is not known, s divided by the square root of N is used as an estimate of σM:
[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{N}}=\dfrac{2313}{\sqrt{61}}=\dfrac{2313}{7.81}=296.15[/tex]
The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:
[tex]df=n-1=61-1=60[/tex]
The t-value for a 99% confidence interval and 61 degrees of freedom is t=2.66.
The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:
[tex]MOE=t\cdot s_M=2.66 \cdot 296.15=787.84[/tex]
Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:
[tex]LL=M-t \cdot s_M = 9797-787.84=9009\\\\UL=M+t \cdot s_M = 9797+787.84=10585[/tex]
The 99% confidence interval for the mean number of steps taken on a typical workday for all people working in New York City who wear an activity tracker is (9,009, 10,585).
b) The value of 8,500 steps is outside the confidence interval, but this means that it is an unusual value for the mean number of steps for all people in New York City who wear an activity tracker.
We can not use the confidence interval to estimate the probability of individual values.
The activity tracking devices.
The activity tracker re those devices such as watches and a bands that tells you about your physical activity such as skipping, running, and walking. They simply count the steps and tell you about the daily goals and targets. They are quite effective for monitoring blood pressure and more.
Thus answer is 9,009, 10,585 workers, 9,009, and 10,585 steps and population mean.
As per the question, the smart trackers are used by the new york people on a daily basis and they measure the footsteps of the people. A sample of random 61 people was taken and selected on the basis of the tracers. It was found that with these statistical tests a 99% confidence interval was taken for the mean on a typical workday for all people working in City that is 9,009, 10,585. The 95% confidence that the mean number of steps taken by workers of the City was within 9,009 and 10,585 steps.The confidence interval can be used to estimate the probability of the individual values. It can be used for drawing inferences for the population mean.Learn more about the trackers are electronic.
brainly.com/question/17434350.
A circular plate has circumference of 37.7cm. Calculate the diameter of the plate
Anyone that answers I will mark as brilliant
Answer:
12.0
Step-by-step explanation:
d(pi)=37.7
d=12.0
I promise brainieliest for the first to answer What is the solution to the inequality 2x ≥ -4? Click the number line until the correct answer is shown.
Answer:
x ≥ -2
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide both sides of the inequality by 2.
2x ≥ - 4
2x / 2 ≥ -4 / 2
x ≥ -2
Answer:
the answer is the arrow going to the right because its not a negative number and a closed circle
Step-by-step explanation:
so that means that 2x is at LEASt more than -4 opposed to this sign> wich just means greater than
because when you work with variables you usually cannot find the exact amount especially when you are rounding so you know that its biigger than no less than or at least -4
A student used multiple regression analysis to study how family spending (y) is influenced by income
(x1), family size (x2), and additionsto savings(x3). The variables y, x1, and x3 are measured in thousands
of dollars. The following results were obtained.
ANOVA
df SS
Regression 3 45.9634
Residual 11 2.6218
Total
Coefficients Standard Error
Intercept 0.0136
x1
0.7992 0.074
x2
0.2280 0.190
x3
-0.5796 0.920
a. Write out the estimated regression equation for the relationship between the variables. (1
mark)
b. Compute coefficient of determination. What can you say about the strength of this
relationship? (3 marks)
c. Carry out a test to determine whether y is significantly related to the independent variables.
Use a 5% level of significance. (3 marks)
d. Carry out a test to see if x3 and y are significantly related. Use a 5% level of significance.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Given the variables
Y: family spending
X₁: income of a family
X₂: family size
X₃: additions to savings of a family
And the regression output (see attachment)
The population model is Y= α + β₁X₁ + β₂X₂ + β₃X₃
a)
To write the estimated regression equation of the relationship between the variables you have to use the information given in the regression output. Under the column "coefficients", the value that corresponds to "intercept" is the estimation of the y-intercept (a), the value under X₁ corresponds to the estimation for the slop for the variable "income of the family" (b₁), under X₂ is the estimation of the slope for the variable "family size" (b₂) and under X₃ is the estimation for the slope corresponding to the variable "additions to savings" (b₃)
The estimated regression equation is:
^Y= a + b₁X₁ + b₂X₂ + b₃X₃
^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃
b)
Using the SS information you can calculate the coefficient of determination as:
SStotal= SSReg+SSError= 45.9634+2.6218= 48.5852
[tex]R^2= \frac{SS_{Reg}}{SS_{Total}} = \frac{45.9634}{(48.5852)} = 0.946[/tex]
R²= 94.6%
This means that 94.6% of the variability of the average family spending is explained jointly by the family income, the family size and the addition to saving under the estimated model ^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃
c)
The hypotheses are:
H₀: β₁= β₂= β₃= 0
H₁: At least one βi≠0 ∀ i=1, 2, 3
α: 0.05
The statistic for the multiple regression is
[tex]F=\frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}} ~~F_{Df_{Reg};Df_{Error}}[/tex]
[tex]MS_{Reg}= \frac{SS_{reg}}{Df_{Reg}}= \frac{45.9634}{3} = 15.32[/tex]
[tex]MS_{Error}= \frac{SS_{Error}}{Df_{Error}} = \frac{2.6218}{11} = 0.238[/tex]
[tex]F_{H_0}= \frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}}= \frac{15.32}{0.238}= 64.37[/tex]
p-value < .00001
At a 5% significance level, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This means that the family income, family size and the addition to savings modify jointly the average spending of families.
d.
Individual tests:
There are two possible statistics to test the significance of each independent variable: [tex]t= \frac{b_i-\beta_i }{S_{b_i}} ~~t_{n-3}[/tex] ∀ i= 1, 2, 3, or [tex]F=\frac{MS_{X_i}}{MS_{Error}} ~F_{Df_{X_i}; Df_{Error\\}}[/tex]
Since the output doesn't give us the information of the individual ANOVA, you have to use the t-test (Df: n-3= 12-3= 9) for these hypotheses. Using the p-value approach. the decision rule for the three hypothesis will be:
If p-value ≤ α ⇒ Reject null hypothesis.
If p-value > α ⇒ Do not reject the null hypothesis.
1)
H₀: β₁ = 0
H₁: β₁ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_1-\beta_1 }{Sb_1}= \frac{0.7992-0}{0.074}= 10.8[/tex]
p-value < .00001 ⇒ Decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
2)
H₀: β₂ = 0
H₁: β₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_2-\beta_2 }{Sb_2}= \frac{0.2280-0}{0.190}= 1.2[/tex]
p-value: 0.260773 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.
3)
H₀: β₃ = 0
H₁: β₃ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_3-\beta_3 }{Sb_3}= \frac{-0.5796-0}{0.920}= -0.63[/tex]
p-value: 0.544355 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.
So, at a 5% significance level, it seems that the three independent variables influence jointly the variation on the average spending of the families, but looking at them separately, only the income of the families seems to affect their spending habits significantly while the family size or their addition to savings don't seem to have major effect over their spending habits.
I hope this helps!
Which statement best compares the graphs of y = –3xn and y = 3xn?
Answer: choice B
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph of y=-3x^n is the reflection of the graph of y=3x^n about the x-axis.
Answer: B
Step-by-step explanation:
