This excerpt supports the main text by providing supplemental information on the details of how the Soviet Union failed to launch a satellite, highlighting the failures of their space program.
For more such question on Soviet Union
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ8
Answer:
B. It provides supplemental information about the reactions of the Soviet Union’s first trip to space.
Explanation:
Edge 2023
How does individual change, team change, and organizational change play into this case?
What could Daisy have learned through leading change? How could she have achieved better buy-in and institutionalized a faster recruitment process?
What role would a change agent play?
Individual change: Daisy was frustrated in the kind of tactics that were being planned by Elsie. She creates a team of recruiters that are in charge of quickly recruiting the prospects, as opposed to using external agents to handle the entire hiring process. Daisy organised a series of brainstorming meetings with operational managers who needed people, as well as internal and external recruiters at various levels. Daisy's initiatives in this example demonstrate how she has changed herself.
Team change: Daisy divided the hiring procedure into the following phases: identifying prospects, document gathering, initial reviews, interviewing, background and reference checks, offer distribution, and the holding period before the new hire can begin. She chose the ideal time frame for each stage after consulting the team and heavily drawing on the external recruiter's expertise. A project team was formed with an operations manager (Mike), an internal recruiter (Abdel), and an external recruiter (Marissa). They were asked to record the actual timeline for each candidate during the recruitment process, and they all agreed and were eager to try it out. The group got to work on the strategies, which helped to reduce the amount of time needed. Organizational change: The recruitment process took 50 days instead of the 80 days that the team had previously taken after putting the methods that Daisy and her team had set into action. This indicates the company's organisational transformation.
Daisy must have discovered through her experience as a change agent that while some people are absolutely in favour of change and would accept it if it were to occur, others are utterly opposed to it and would never support it. She might have discovered how to deal with opposition to change and what plans need be made for it in order to successfully implement the change. She could have improved buy-in and institutionalised the quicker hiring process by incorporating all of the staff in the change process and giving training to all of the important stakeholders about why the change is necessary.She needs to explain to the stakeholders in the organisation the benefits and drawbacks of the move. As a result, the organization's diverse stakeholders would be more likely to accept the change.
An internal change agent is typically a team member who is knowledgeable about organisation development, behavioural sciences, and human intervention. The fact that internal change agents are aware of the organization's history of change initiatives and social politics is noteworthy in this case. They will work assiduously to build strong connections to strengthen attitudes and cultural views towards change - even after the implementation process is complete. To assist their project, organisations must choose external change agents if they don't have an inside employee with the necessary expertise. Although external change agents offer a different viewpoint, their presence can endanger the current workforce, and their hiring can add a significant cost to long change initiatives.
Learn more about individual, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14060482
#SPJ4
How was the Declaration of Independence organized? What practical purpose did this organization serve? What did each part seek to accomplish?
What are the reasons that William Murray, Earl of Mansfield says that Parliament has the right to tax the colonies? Take a position as to whether his arguments were reasonable and justify your stand
Answer:
Part 1: Organization of the Declaration of Independence
The Declaration of Independence is divided into three main parts: the preamble, the list of grievances, and the conclusion.
1. Preamble: The preamble states the reasons why the Continental Congress felt it was necessary to declare independence from Great Britain. It starts with the famous phrase "When in the course of human events" and goes on to explain that it is necessary for the colonies to dissolve their political ties with Great Britain.
2. List of Grievances: The list of grievances outlines the specific complaints that the colonists had against the British government. It includes a long list of abuses and violations of their rights, such as taxation without representation, the quartering of troops in private homes, and the denial of trial by jury.
3. Conclusion: The conclusion asserts the colonies' right to be free and independent states and declares that they are "absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown." It also announces the formation of a new nation, the United States of America.
Part 2: Practical Purpose of the Organization
The organization of the Declaration of Independence served a practical purpose by laying out a clear and concise argument for why the colonies were justified in declaring independence from Great Britain. By starting with the preamble, the document establishes the philosophical basis for independence, while the list of grievances provides specific evidence to support the colonists' claims. The conclusion then wraps up the argument by asserting the colonies' right to self-determination and announcing the formation of a new nation.
Part 3: William Murray, Earl of Mansfield and the Right to Tax the Colonies
William Murray, Earl of Mansfield, was a British jurist who argued that Parliament had the right to tax the American colonies. Mansfield believed that Parliament had the power to tax the colonies because they were represented in Parliament through their British representatives. He argued that the colonists were "virtually" represented in Parliament, even though they did not have direct representation.
While Mansfield's argument may have been legally sound, it did not take into account the colonists' perspective on the issue of taxation without representation. The colonists believed that they should not be taxed by a government in which they had no direct representation, and they felt that they were being denied their basic rights as English citizens.
In my opinion, Mansfield's arguments were not reasonable because they ignored the colonists' legitimate grievances and failed to take into account the practical realities of colonial life. While the colonists may have been "virtually" represented in Parliament, they had no real say in the decisions that affected their lives and communities. The colonists' objections to taxation without representation were a key factor in the decision to declare independence and establish a new nation based on the principles of democracy and self-determination.
what is one important factor that contributed to the ability of europeans to conquer the aztec and inca peoples during the european colonization of the americas?
Answer:
One important factor that contributed to Europeans being able to conquer the Aztec and Inca peoples was their possession of far superior weapons and military technology.
The Aztecs and Incas, while advanced civilizations in their own right, were still fighting with weapons like clubs, spears and archaic armor when the Spanish conquistadors arrived. The Europeans, on the other hand, had guns, cannons and steel swords - weapons and armor made from superior materials.
When the Spanish conquistadors, along with their horses, guns and cannons first confronted the Aztecs and Incas, the native populations had never seen anything like it. The advanced European weaponry and military equipment gave the conquistadors a huge tactical advantage that the Aztecs and Incas could not match.
The Aztecs and Incas were also unfamiliar with and undisciplined against the tactics of cavalry and artillery that the Spanish employed. This, combined with the psychological impact of seemingly magical weapons like guns that could kill at a distance, contributed to the Spanish being able to conquer the Aztec and Inca civilizations relatively quickly despite being vastly outnumbered.
So in summary, the technological and military gap between the relatively primitive weapons of the Aztecs and Incas and the far advanced weaponry of the European conquistadors was an important factor that helped enable the Spanish conquest by giving them a decisive edge on the battlefield.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which arguments is superior
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
Happy to help; have a great day! :)
During war time in history did clinical work become prominent?
A. During Wendi’s practice
B. World War II
C. World War I
D. During the inception of behavioral psychology
During World War I and World War II, clinical work became prominent. The correct options are B and C.
During times of war, especially World War I and World War II, the demand for clinical work increased significantly. These conflicts resulted in large numbers of soldiers experiencing physical injuries, trauma, and psychological distress. As a result, the need for clinical services, including medical treatment and mental health support, became more prominent.
During World War I, advancements in medicine and psychiatry led to the establishment of specialized medical units and psychiatric hospitals to treat soldiers suffering from physical and psychological wounds. Similarly, during World War II, clinical work expanded further to address the physical and mental health needs of military personnel.
The correct options are B and C.
To know more about World War I, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/32148773
#SPJ4
After Hitler came to power, German people of Jewish ancestry lost their rights overnight. gradually lost their rights. left their homeland immediately. gained the right of citizenship.
Which three structual issues did the second wave of the womens movement work to adress
Answer:
The second wave of the women's movement, which began in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, addressed a range of structural issues related to gender inequality and discrimination. Some of the key issues that the movement worked to address include:
1. Reproductive rights: The movement advocated for a woman's right to control her own body and make decisions about her reproductive health, including access to birth control and safe, legal abortion.
2. Workplace discrimination: The movement sought to address the systemic discrimination that women faced in the workplace, including unequal pay, limited job opportunities, and sexual harassment.
3. Patriarchy and gender roles: The movement challenged traditional gender roles and the patriarchal system that reinforced them, advocating for women's liberation and the dismantling of oppressive social structures that limited women's autonomy and opportunities.
These issues were addressed through a range of tactics and strategies, including protests, demonstrations, legal challenges, and the development of feminist theory and discourse. The second wave of the women's movement had a significant impact on gender relations and social structures in the United States and around the world, paving the way for further progress in the fight for gender equality.
Chapter 9
Discuss the Zionist terrorist organizations that have existed in Israel. Looking at some of the prominent Middle Eastern terrorist groups discussed in this chapter, what are some of the techniques used by terrorist organizations to increase recognition, support, and power? What external forces discussed in previous chapters multiplied the strength of these terrorist organizations? Do you think it is possible to bring religious extremism to an end?
Chapter 10 How did the Tupamaros affect revolution worldwide? If the Tupamaros were so influential, then why did they ultimately fail in their own quest? What are the major issues surrounding Naxilite terrorism? How does this compare to the issues that gave rise to the Tupamaros? Julie Mazzei argues that the conditions giving rise to death squads develop when several factors come together to form a favorable environment. What are these factors? Do you agree or disagree with her argument?
Terrorist organizations often employ tactics such as propaganda, recruitment, fundraising, and strategic targeting.
Propaganda is used to spread their ideology, recruit sympathizers, and gain media attention. Recruitment involves attracting individuals who share their beliefs or can be coerced into joining through various means, including promises of power or addressing grievances. Fundraising is essential for sustaining operations and acquiring resources, often achieved through illicit means such as smuggling or extortion. Strategic targeting involves selecting high-profile or symbolic targets to maximize impact and generate fear or sympathy.
External forces that can contribute to the strength of terrorist organizations include political instability, regional conflicts, social grievances, economic disparities, and external support. Political instability provides fertile ground for extremist ideologies to thrive, as it creates power vacuums and weak governance. Regional conflicts can fuel radicalization and provide opportunities for terrorist groups to exploit existing grievances. Social and economic disparities can create environments where individuals feel marginalized, leading them to seek solace in extremist ideologies. Additionally, external support from state sponsors or sympathetic groups can provide financial, logistical, and ideological assistance to terrorist organizations, enhancing their capabilities.
Regarding the possibility of bringing religious extremism to an end, it is a complex and multifaceted challenge. Religious extremism stems from a combination of ideological, political, socio-economic, and historical factors, making it difficult to eradicate entirely. Countering religious extremism requires addressing root causes such as poverty, lack of education, political grievances, and promoting social inclusion. It also involves fostering dialogue, promoting tolerance, and challenging extremist narratives through counter-messaging efforts. However, it is important to note that complete eradication may not be achievable, and efforts should focus on mitigating the impact and influence of extremist ideologies while promoting peaceful coexistence.
To know more about Zionist terrorist organizations here
https://brainly.com/question/3898272
#SPJ4
