a group of observations measured at successive time intervals is known as a(n) . a. trend component b. forecast c. additive time series model d. time series

Using the empirical rule, the estimated probability of a gorilla living between 14.3 and 19.4 years is 95

We have,

Find the z-scores corresponding to the values and then use the empirical rule percentages.

The formula for the z-score is:

z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the value we want to find the z-score for, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

Find the z-score for X = 14.3 years.

= (14.3 - 16) / 1.71 ≈ -1.05

Find the z-score for X = 19.4 years.

= (19.4 - 16) / 1.71 ≈ 1.76

Use the empirical rule percentages to estimate the probability of a gorilla living between 14.3 and 19.4 years.

For the interval between 14.3 and 19.4 years, we are interested in the area between -1.05 and 1.76 on the normal distribution curve.

The empirical rule percentages are:

68% of the data falls within 1 standard deviation from the mean.

95% of the data falls within 2 standard deviations from the mean.

99.7% of the data falls within 3 standard deviations from the mean.

Since the z-scores for 14.3 and 19.4 are within 2 standard deviations from the mean (-1.05 and 1.76), we can estimate that approximately 95% of the gorillas' lifespans in the zoo fall between 14.3 and 19.4 years.

Thus,

Using the empirical rule, the estimated probability of a gorilla living between 14.3 and 19.4 years is 95

Learn more about the empirical rules here:

https://brainly.com/question/32443347

#SPJ12

The complete question:

"The lifespans of gorillas in a particular zoo are normally distributed. The average gorilla lives 16.16 years, and the standard deviation is 1.71 years. Use the empirical rule (68% - 95% - 99.7%) to estimate the probability of a gorilla living between 14.3 and 19.4 years."

The area of the figure is 102 square inches.

To find the area of the figure, we need to first calculate the area of the rectangle and then the area of the triangle and add them together.

Area_rectangle = length x width

= 15 in. x 5 in. = 75 in²

The base of the triangle is the same as the length of the rectangle minus the distance from the vertex.

i.e. 15 in. - 3 in. = 9 in.

The height of the triangle is 11 in - 5 in = 6 in

Area_triangle = (1/2) x base x height

= (1/2) x 9 in. x 6 in. = 27 in²

Therefore, the required total area is the sum of the area of the rectangle and the area of the triangle

Total_area = Area_rectangle + Area_triangle

= 75 in² + 27 in² = 102 in²

So, the area of the figure is 102 square inches.

Hence, option d is correct.

Learn more about Area of Rectangle here

https://brainly.com/question/24943955

#SPJ4

The expression for the cost of 5 large Italian ices in terms of the cost of a medium Italian ice is "5d + 10" dollars.

To find the cost of 5 large Italian ices, we need to multiply the cost of one large Italian ice by 5. So, the expression for the cost of 5 large Italian ices is:

5 × (d + 2)

We can simplify this expression by using the distributive property of multiplication. This means that we can multiply the number outside the parentheses (5) by each term inside the parentheses (d and 2):

5 × (d + 2) = 5 × d + 5 × 2

Simplifying further, we get:

5d + 10

To know more about expression here

https://brainly.com/question/30842300

#SPJ4

Answer: A. 11 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the distance between the bike rack at (-6, 1) and the bench at (5, 1), we can use the distance formula:

d = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

where (x1, y1) is the coordinates of the bike rack and (x2, y2) is the coordinates of the bench.

Substituting the values, we get:

d = sqrt((5 - (-6))^2 + (1 - 1)^2)

d = sqrt((11)^2 + 0^2)

d = sqrt(121)

d = 11

Therefore, the distance between the bike rack and the bench is 11 yards. So, the correct answer is A.

Answer: 11 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of the resulting cone is  3, 336, 704m³

Given that the volume of a cone is 1216 m³. We need to find the volume of the resulting cone when the original cone is dilated by a scale factor of 14.

We know that the volume of a cone with radius of the base 'r' and height 'h' is given by;

Volume 1 = 1/3 πr²h =  1216 m³

After dilation, both the radius and height will be increased by 14 times, so the new volume of the resulting cone will be

Volume of dilation = 14³ ×  1/3 πr²h

Substitute the value

Volume of dilation = 14³ × 1216

Find the cube

Volume of dilation = 2744 × 1216

Multiply the values

Volume of dilation = 3, 336, 704m³

Learn about cones at: https://brainly.com/question/6613758

#SPJ1

This means that Janelys would need to score at least 71 on Exam B in order to do equivalently well as she did on Exam A.

To determine how well Janelys must score on Exam B to do equivalently well as she did on Exam A, we need to calculate the z-score for her score on Exam A, and then use that z-score to find the corresponding score on Exam B.

The formula for calculating the z-score is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Where x is the score (in this case, 230), μ is the mean (in this case, 200), and σ is the standard deviation (in this case, 10).

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (230 - 200) / 10
z = 3

This means that Janelys scored 3 standard deviations above the mean on Exam A.

To find the corresponding score on Exam B, we can use the formula:

x = μ + (z * σ)

Where μ is the mean of Exam B (in this case, 56), z is the z-score we just calculated (3), and σ is the standard deviation of Exam B (in this case, 5).

Plugging in the values, we get:

x = 56 + (3 * 5)
x = 71

This means that Janelys would need to score at least 71 on Exam B in order to do equivalently well as she did on Exam A.

To know more about standard deviation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Janelys must score a 71 on exam B in order to do equivalently well as she did on exam A. To determine how well Janelys must score on exam B to do equivalently well as she did on exam A,  to calculate the z-score for her score on exam A and then use that z-score to find the corresponding score on exam B

To calculate the z-score for Janelys' score on exam A, we use the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the score, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

In this case, Janelys' score on exam A is x = 230, the mean is μ = 200, and the standard deviation is σ = 10.

z = (230 - 200) / 10 = 3

So Janelys' score on exam A is 3 standard deviations above the mean.

Now we need to find the corresponding score on exam B that is also 3 standard deviations above the mean. To do this, we use the formula:

x = μ + zσ

where x is the score we want to find, μ is the mean of exam B, z is the z-score we calculated above, and σ is the standard deviation of exam B.

In this case, the mean of exam B is μ = 56 and the standard deviation is σ = 5.

x = 56 + 3(5) = 71

So Janelys must score a 71 on exam B in order to do equivalently well as she did on exam A.

To know more about standard deviation Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

A. the solution to the integral equation is: y(t) = 3/8 * sin(4t) - 3/16 * cos(4t) + 3/8 * t²

B. y(t) is indeed the solution to the integral equation.

What is integration?

Integration is a mathematical operation that is the reverse of differentiation. Integration involves finding an antiderivative or indefinite integral of a function.

a) To solve the integral equation using Laplace transforms, we first take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation. Let's denote the Laplace transform variable as s. Then we have:

LHS = L { ∫sin(4(t - w)) y(w) dw }

= ∫ e^(-sw) sin(4(t-w)) y(w) dw

= y * sin(4t) * (1/s) - y * cos(4t) * (4/s²)

where * denotes convolution. Note that we used the Laplace transform of sin(4t) and cos(4t) to obtain the last line.

For the RHS, we have:

RHS = L { 3t² } = 6/s³

Setting LHS = RHS, we obtain:

y * sin(4t) * (1/s) - y * cos(4t) * (4/s²) = 6/s³

Solving for y, we get:

y(t) = [tex]L^{-1}[/tex] { 6 / s³ * [ (s² + 16) / s ] }

= 6/16 * t² + 3/8 * sin(4t) - 3/16 * cos(4t)

where [tex]L^{-1}[/tex] denotes the inverse Laplace transform.

Therefore, the solution to the integral equation is:

y(t) = 3/8 * sin(4t) - 3/16 * cos(4t) + 3/8 * t²

b) Using convolution, we can verify that y(t) satisfies the original integral equation:

LHS = ∫ sin(4(t - w)) y(w) dw

= ∫ sin(4(t - w)) [3/8 * sin(4w) - 3/16 * cos(4w) + 3/8 * w²] dw

= [3/8 * cos(4t) - 3/16 * sin(4t)] + [3/32 * cos(4t) - 3/64 * sin(4t)] + [3/32 * t² - 3/8 * t * sin(4t) + 3/16 * cos(4t)]

= 3t²

where we used integration by parts to evaluate the integrals involving sine and cosine functions. Therefore, y(t) is indeed the solution to the integral equation.

To learn more about integration from the given link:

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ1

If the maximum height of the ball is greater than or equal to the height of the fence, then it would clear the fence.

To determine whether the ball hit towards the fence would clear it, we need to use the laws of projectile motion. Assuming the ball was hit at an angle of 45 degrees, we can calculate the maximum height it would reach using the following formula:

h = ([tex]v^{2}[/tex] * [tex]sin^{2} \alpha[/tex]) / (2g)

where h is the maximum height, v is the initial velocity, [tex]\alpha[/tex] is the launch angle, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]).

Since we know the distance the ball traveled (130 feet), we can use the following formula to calculate the initial velocity:

d = [tex]v^{2}[/tex] * sin(2[tex]\alpha[/tex]) / g

where d is the distance, v is the initial velocity, [tex]\alpha[/tex] is the launch angle, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]).

Converting the distance and height to meters (since the formula uses SI units), we have:

d = 130 * 0.3048 = 39.624 m

h = 7.62 m (assuming a 45 degree launch angle)

Using the second formula, we can solve for the initial velocity:

v = [tex]\sqrt{dg/sin2\alpha }[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{39.624*9.8/sin(90)}[/tex] = 28.07 m/s

To determine whether the ball would clear the fence, we need to calculate the height of the fence in meters:

fence_height = 25 * 0.3048 = 7.62 m

If the maximum height of the ball is greater than or equal to the height of the fence, then it would clear the fence. In this case, since the maximum height is 7.62 m and the fence height is also 7.62 m, the ball would just clear the fence if it was hit directly towards it at a launch angle of 45 degrees. However, if the ball was hit at a different angle or with a different initial velocity, the outcome could be different.

Correct Question:

There is a 25ft fence, 130 feet away from where the ball was hit. If the ball was hit towards the fence, would it be high enough to clear the fence?

To learn more about height here:

https://brainly.com/question/10726356

#SPJ4

Answer:

A= 1320 u^2 P= 176 u

Step-by-step explanation

A= 1/2 (b)(h)

A=1/2 (48)(55)= 1320

P= a+b+c

48+55+73=176

Answer:

A= 1320 u^2 P= 176 u

Step-by-step explanation

A= 1/2 (b)(h)

A=1/2 (48)(55)= 1320

P= a+b+c

48+55+73=176

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a)

[tex]p(x) = 10000( {.997}^{x} )[/tex]

b)

[tex]p(11) = 10000( {.997}^{11} ) = 9675[/tex]

c)

[tex]10000( {.997}^{x} ) = 8000[/tex]

[tex]x = 74.27 \: years[/tex]

The population will be 8,000 in about 74.27 years after 2005, or sometime in 2079.

Large MAD tells us that the average distance between each data value and the mean is large.

Given that;

The mean age of swimmers for all of these teams is 10.

Since, MAD is the mean absolute deviation (MAD) of a set, it tells the average distance between each data value and the mean.

Hence, It is a method to express the variance in the data set.

So, the large MAD tells us that the average distance between each data value and the mean is large.

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

The national average ACT score is greater than the Washington DC average

To conduct a hypothesis test, we start by stating the null hypothesis (H₀) and the alternative hypothesis (H₁). The null hypothesis is usually the claim or statement that we want to test, while the alternative hypothesis is the opposite of the null hypothesis. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the national average ACT score is not greater than the Washington DC average, while the alternative hypothesis is that the national average ACT score is greater than the Washington DC average.

Hypotheses: H₀ : µn <= µDC, H₁ : µn > µDC

Next, we need to determine the critical value(s) for the test. A significance level of 0.01 corresponds to a critical value of 2.33 for a one-tailed test, which is what we have in this case.

Critical value(s): CV = 2.33

To compute the test statistic. We will use a z-test since the population standard deviation is known.

Test statistic: z = (µn - µDC - 0) / (σ / √(n))

where µn = 21.4, µDC = 21.1, σ = 3, and n = 500.

Substituting the values, we get:

z = (21.4 - 21.1 - 0) / (3 / √(500))

z = 1.94

In this case, the test statistic is 1.94, which is greater than the critical value of 2.33. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that the national average ACT score is greater than the Washington DC average

To know more about Hypotheses here

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

Complete Question is ACT Scores A survey of 1000 students nationwide showed a mean ACT score of 21.4. A survey of 500 Washington DC scores showed a mean of 21.1. If the population standard deviation in each case is 3, can we conclude the national average is greater than the Washington DC average? Use a -0.01 and use for the nationwide mean ACT score. Part 1 of 5 (a) State the hypotheses and identify the claim. H: H, H2 not claim H: M, > H2 claim This hypothesis test is a one-tailed v test. Part: 1/5 Part 2 of 5 m (b) Find the critical value(s). Round the answer(s) to at least two decimal places. If there is more than one critical value, separate them with commas. Critical value(s): DD х HH, H2>30 claim This hypothesis test is a one-tailed test. Part 2 of 5 (b) Find the critical value(s). Round the answer(s) to at least two decimal places. If there is more than one critical value, separate them with commas. Critical value(s): 2.33 Part: 2/5 Part 3 of 5 (c) Compute the test value. Always round 2 score values to at least two decimal places.

the backboard is 14 feet tall.by using similar Triangle properties (Height of person) / (Length of person's shadow) = (Height of backboard) / (Length of backboard's shadow)

Let's use similar triangles to find the height of the backboard.

Step 1: Identify the given measurements.
The person is 7 feet tall and casts a shadow of 12 feet. The shadow of the backboard is 24 feet.

Step 2: Set up a proportion using similar triangles.
(Height of person) / (Length of person's shadow) = (Height of backboard) / (Length of backboard's shadow)
7 ft / 12 ft = (Height of backboard) / 24 ft

Step 3: Solve for the height of the backboard.
To find the height of the backboard, cross-multiply and solve for the unknown value.
7 ft * 24 ft = 12 ft * (Height of backboard)

Step 4: Calculate the height of the backboard.
7 ft * 24 ft = 168 ft²
168 ft² / 12 ft = (Height of backboard)
14 ft = (Height of backboard)

To know more about similar Triangle Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14926756

#SPJ11

The margin of error for a 95% confidence interval can be calculated using the formula: Margin of error = (z-score) x (standard deviation)

where the z-score is the number of standard deviations corresponding to the desired level of confidence (in this case, 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval) and the standard deviation is calculated as:
Standard deviation = sqrt[(population proportion) x (1 - population proportion) / sample size]
We know from the given information that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval is 62% and the upper limit is 73.1%. Therefore, the midpoint of the interval is:
Midpoint = (lower limit + upper limit) / 2 = (62% + 73.1%) / 2 = 67.55%
Using this midpoint as an estimate for the population proportion, we can solve for the standard deviation:
Standard deviation = sqrt[(0.6755) x (1 - 0.6755) / n]
where n is the sample size (which is not given). Since we don't know the sample size, we can't calculate the standard deviation directly. However, we can use the fact that the margin of error is half the width of the confidence interval to estimate the sample size:
Margin of error = (upper limit - lower limit) / 2
Plugging in the given values, we get:
Margin of error = (73.1% - 62%) / 2 = 5.55%
Now we can solve for the standard deviation:
Standard deviation = sqrt[(0.6755) x (1 - 0.6755) / (sample size)]
Using the margin of error as an estimate for the standard deviation, we can solve for the sample size:
5.55% = 1.96 x sqrt[(0.6755) x (1 - 0.6755) / (sample size)]
Solving for sample size, we get:
sample size = 610.05
Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a sample size of 611. Therefore, the margin of error for this 95%confidence interval is approximately 5.55%, assuming a sample size of 611.

Given a 95% confidence interval for a population proportion with limits (62%, 73.1%), you are asked to find the margin of error.
Step 1: Calculate the midpoint of the interval.
Midpoint = (Lower limit + Upper limit) / 2
Midpoint = (62% + 73.1%) / 2
Midpoint = 135.1% / 2
Midpoint = 67.55%
Step 2: Determine the margin of error.
Margin of error = (Upper limit - Midpoint) or (Midpoint - Lower limit)
Margin of error = (73.1% - 67.55%) or (67.55% - 62%)
Margin of error = 5.55%
The margin of error for the given 95% confidence interval of the population proportion with limits (62%, 73.1%) is 5.55%.

Visit here to learn more about standard deviations:

brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Without seeing the residual plot depicted, it is difficult to infer anything about it. However, in general, a residual plot is used to assess the goodness of fit of a regression model.

It shows the differences between the predicted values from the regression equation and the actual values of the dependent variable. If the plot shows a random pattern with no clear trends, it suggests that the regression equation is a good representation of the association between the two variables. If there is a clear pattern or trend in the plot, it suggests that the regression equation is not a good representation of the association between the two variables. Therefore, based on the information provided, the most appropriate answer would be (b) or (c), depending on the characteristics of the residual plot depicted.
Based on the information given, I am unable to see the residual plot depicted below. However, I can explain what can be inferred from a residual plot in general when analyzing the relationship between two variables and the regression equation.

When examining a residual plot, you can infer the following:
a. If the plot shows a random scatter of points, it indicates that there is no correlation between the two variables.
b. If the plot shows a pattern or systematic trend, it means that the regression equation is not a good representation of the association between the two variables.
c. If the plot shows a random scatter of points around the horizontal axis (with no patterns or trends), it suggests that the regression equation is a good representation of the association between the two variables.
d. None of the above would apply if the residual plot does not fit any of the descriptions mentioned in options a, b, or c.

Visit here to learn more about regression equation:

brainly.com/question/30738733

#SPJ11

In order to establish a two-element set with each element being a positive integer smaller than 95, there are thus 4371 possible combinations.

Combinations are defined by the following formula: C(n, r) = n! / (r! * (n-r)!)

Where n is the overall number of things and r denotes the number of items to be picked at random.

Without respect to order, we must select 2 elements from a possible total of 94. As a result, we can use the following formula to apply the rule: C(94, 2) = 94! / (2! * (94-2)!) = (94 * 93 * 92 *... * 3 * 2 * 1) / [(2 * 1) * (92 * 91 *... * 3 * 2 * 1)]

= (94 * 93) / (2 * 1) = 4371

To know more about combination,

https://brainly.com/question/25653387

#SPJ11

The most considerable count of students who enjoyed at least one of the toppings was in Grade 7, which had a total of 45 participants.

To analyze the number of students in each grade, one must multiply the combined relative frequencies for every row by the absolute amount of students (100).

Grade 6: (0.15 + 0.10 + 0.05) * 100 = 0.3 * 100 = 30 learners

Grade 7: (0.20 + 0.15 + 0.10) * 100 = 0.45 * 100 = 45 pupils

Grade 8: (0.10 + 0.05 + 0.10) * 100 = 0.25 * 100 = 25 scholars

The most considerable count of students who enjoyed at least one of the toppings was in Grade 7, which had a total of 45 participants.

Read more about relative frequency table here:

https://brainly.com/question/26177128
#SPJ1

In a survey, 100 students from grades 6, 7, and 8 were asked about their favorite pizza topping. The relative frequency table below shows the results:

Grade Pepperoni Cheese Veggie

6 0.15 0.10 0.05

7 0.20 0.15 0.10

8 0.10 0.05 0.10

Which grade had the greatest number of students who preferred one of the toppings?

The correct expression for "a does not equal b" is "a ≠ b". The symbol ≠ represents the inequality of "not equal to". This means that a and b are not the same and can have different values. It is important to note that the inequality symbol ≠ is used for non-equal values, while the equals symbol = is used for equal values.

In mathematics, inequalities are used to compare two values and show how they differ. They are represented by symbols such as <, >, ≤, and ≥, which stand for less than, greater than, less than or equal to, and greater than or equal to, respectively. These symbols help us understand the relationship between two values and can be used to solve problems involving numerical comparisons.

When it comes to choosing the correct inequality or expression, it is important to carefully analyze the given information and determine which symbol accurately represents the relationship between the values. In this case, since a does not equal b, the correct symbol to use is ≠. By choosing the correct inequality or expression, we can ensure that our mathematical statements are clear, accurate, and meaningful.

learn more about the inequality symbol here: brainly.com/question/30092665

#SPJ11

The claim that needs to be proven is

If x is a root of a sixth-order polynomial with real coefficients, then x is also a root.

To prove this statement, we can use the fact that complex roots of polynomials with real coefficients always come in conjugate pairs.

Suppose that x is a root of a sixth-order polynomial P(x) with real coefficients. Then we can write P(x) in the following form:

[tex]P(x) = (x - r1)(x - r2)(x - r3)(x - r4)(x - r5)(x - r6)[/tex]

where r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, and r6 are the roots of P(x), some of which may be equal to x.

Since x is a root of P(x), we can factor out [tex](x - x)[/tex] from the above expression, giving:

[tex]P(x) = (x - x)(x - r2)(x - r3)(x - r4)(x - r5)(x - r6)[/tex]

Each of the remaining factors in this expression is a polynomial of degree 5 with real coefficients. Therefore, by the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, each of these factors has either one or two (complex conjugate) roots.

However, since the total number of roots of P(x) is six (counting multiplicity), and we have already accounted for one of these roots (x), the remaining five roots must come in conjugate pairs. That is, if r2 is a complex root of P(x), then so is its complex conjugate r2*. Similarly, if r3 is a complex root of P(x), then so is its complex conjugate r3*, and so on for r4, r5, and r6.

Thus, we can write P(x) in the following form, where each of the terms is either a real linear factor or a pair of complex conjugate factors:

[tex]P(x) = (x - x)Q(x)[/tex]

where Q(x) is a polynomial of degree 5 with real coefficients, and the roots of Q(x) come in conjugate pairs.

Since Q(x) has real coefficients and the roots of Q(x) come in conjugate pairs, it follows that if x is a root of Q(x), then its complex conjugate x* must also be a root of Q(x). Therefore, if x is a root of P(x), which means that P(x) = 0, then we can substitute this value of x into the above expression for P(x) to get:

[tex]0 = (x - x)Q(x)[/tex]

which suggests [tex]Q(x) = 0[/tex], which.

Thus, if x is a root of P(x), then it must be a root of Q(x). But we have just shown that if x is a root of Q(x), then its complex conjugate x* must also be a root of Q(x). Therefore, x and x* are both roots of Q(x), and hence both roots of P(x).

Therefore, we have proved that if x is a root of a sixth-order polynomial with real coefficients, then x is also a root.

To learn more about Polynomial visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ4

Answer:

Account A:

[tex]4750 {e}^{.0375 \times 7} = 6175.84[/tex]

Account B:

[tex]5100 {(1 + \frac{.03875}{12}) }^{12 \times 5} = 6188.41[/tex]

Account B has a larger balance.

Answer: The value of the leading coefficient of the quadratic function f(x) = x^2 – 8x – 4 is 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

The leading coefficient of a quadratic function is the coefficient of the highest degree term of the function, which is the squared term x^2 in this case.

The given quadratic function f(x) = x^2 – 8x – 4 is already in standard form, where the coefficient of the squared term is 1. Therefore, the leading coefficient of the function is 1.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer above is correct.

How closely repeated values of the estimator are to one another is the optimal response to the missing information (ii).

The variance of an estimator is a measure of how much the estimates vary from one sample to another. Specifically, determines how closely repeated estimator values match one another. Option

Option (i) is not correct, because the variance of an estimator is not a measure of how close the estimator is to the true value, but rather a measure of how much it varies from one sample to another.

Option (iii) is also not correct, because the mean of the estimator is not necessarily equal to the true value, and the variance of the estimator measures how much the estimates vary from one sample to another, regardless of whether the mean of the estimator is close to the true value or not.

Option (iv) is also not correct, because it refers to the variance of the mean of the estimator, rather than the variance of the estimator itself.

The variance of the estimator's mean serves as a gauge of how much sample means fluctuate from one sample to the next.

As a result, the right response is ii, which refers to how closely related repeated estimator values are to one another.

To learn more about repeated values visit

https://brainly.com/question/27809901

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Choose the best answer to fill in the blank. The variance of an estimator measures ____________.

i. how close the estimator is to the true value.

ii. how close repeated values of the estimator are to each other.

iii. how close the mean of the estimator is to the true value.

iv. how close repeated values of the mean of the estimator are to each other.

The value of the surface area is 176 cm²

The formula for calculating the surface area of triangular prism is expressed as;

SA = (Perimeter × length) + 2(base area)

From the information given, we have that;

Perimeter = 3 + 4 + 5

Add the values

Perimeter = 12cm

Now. substitute the values

Surface area = (12)8 + 2(8×5)

expand the bracket

Surface area = 96 + 2(40)

expand the bracket

Surface area = 96 + 80

Add the values, we have;

Surface area = 176 cm²

Learn about surface area at: https://brainly.com/question/76387

#SPJ1

The surface area of each of the hemisphere's are:

1) S.A = 1520.5 cm²

2) S.A = 929.4 ft²

3) S.A = 706.9 m²

4) S.A = 615.8 in²

5) S.A = 804.2 in²

6) S.A = 380.1 yd²

The formula for the area of a sphere is expressed as:

S.A = 4πr²

1) The radius is given as r = 11 cm

S.A = 4 * π * 11²

S.A = 1520.5 cm²

2) The radius is given as r = 8.6 ft

S.A = 4 * π * 8.6²

S.A = 929.4 ft²

3) The diameter is given as d = 15 m

Thus, radius: r = 15/2 = 7.5 m

S.A = 4 * π * 7.5²

S.A = 706.9 m²

4) The radius is given as r = 7 in

S.A = 4 * π * 7²

S.A = 615.8 in²

5) The radius is given as r = 8 cm

S.A = 4 * π * 8²

S.A = 804.2 in²

6) The diameter is given as d = 11 yards

Thus, radius: r = 11/2 = 5.5 yards

S.A = 4 * π * 5.5²

S.A = 380.1 yd²

Read more about surface area at: https://brainly.com/question/1293273

#SPJ1

the area of the new parking lot is  28, 800 yd²

The scale factor is simply defined as a measure for similar figures such that they have the same configuration but have different scales or measures.

The formula for scale factor is ;

scale factor = dimensions of new object/dimensions of original object

We have that the area of the parking lot is 14,400 yd²

After enlarging with a scale factor of 2, we have that;

Area of the parking lot = area of the original lot × 2

Substitute the values

Area of the parking lot =  14,400 × 2

Multiply the values

Area of the new parking lot =  28, 800 yd²

Learn more about area at: https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

Yes, the statement is a proper interpretation of a 95% confidence interval. A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the true population parameter with a certain degree of confidence.

The given statement is: "95% of the possible samples from this population will have sample statistics in this particular interval."

This statement is not a proper interpretation of a 95% confidence interval. A correct interpretation would be: "We are 95% confident that the true population parameter falls within this particular interval."

The key difference is that a confidence interval provides an estimated range for the population parameter, rather than describing the proportion of samples that fall within the interval.

to learn more about confidence interval click here:

brainly.com/question/28969535

#SPJ11

The solution to the equation 3/5x = 2 is x = 10/3.

What is equation?

An equation is a mathematical statement that asserts that two expressions are equal. An equation typically contains one or more variables (letters that represent unknown or varying quantities), along with constants and mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and exponentiation.

To solve the equation 3/5x = 2, we need to isolate x on one side of the equation.

First, we can simplify the left side of the equation by multiplying both sides by the reciprocal of 3/5, which is 5/3, as follows:

(5/3)(3/5)x = (5/3)2

This simplifies to:

x = 10/3

Therefore, the solution to the equation 3/5x = 2 is x = 10/3.

To learn more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ4

Answer:a party of fishermen rented a boat for $240. two of the fishermen had to withdraw from the party and, as a result, the share of each of the others was increased by $10. how many were in the original party? provide a numerical answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Now ,Let original number in party be "x"::

Average cost per person = 240/x

New number in the party:: x-2

New Average cost per person:: 240/(x-2)

Equation::

10 dollars =New average - old average

240/(x-2) - 240/x = 10

240x - 240(x-2) = 10x(x-2)

480 = 10x^2-20x

x^2 - 2x - 48 = 0

X = 8 (ORIGINAL)

The statement that explains Dr. Iske Larkin's mention of the current population of manatees in 2010 being about 5000 is that the total number of manatees (as close as could be estimated) is about 5000.

It is important to note that this is a population estimate, meaning it is not a precise count, but rather a scientific estimate based on various surveys and data collection methods. While it is difficult to determine an exact population size for a species that inhabits vast areas and is often difficult to track, scientists use various techniques to arrive at an estimate.

These techniques include aerial surveys, tagging and tracking individuals, and monitoring reproductive rates. In the case of manatees, the estimate of around 5000 individuals in 2010 is based on years of research and data collection. This number is important for conservation efforts, as it helps to determine whether the species is increasing,

decreasing, or stable in numbers. Dr. Iske Larkin's statement about the current population of manatees in 2010 refers to the total number of manatees, as close as could be estimated, being about 5000. This does not necessarily imply that the sample size for a study of manatees was 5000, but rather provides an approximate count of the entire manatee population at that time.

To know more about area click here

brainly.com/question/13194650

#SPJ11

The image and the net that represents the solid figure is attached

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

rectangular prism

When the rectangular prism is splitted into nets, we have the following shapes

Shapes = 6 rectangular faces

This means that the net that represents the solid figure has 6 rectangular faces

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

The net of the solid figure is the image 4

Read more about net at

https://brainly.com/question/3081684

#SPJ1