Answer:
I believe d would be the answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
what is the length of the squares side?
Answer:
side ≈ 4.24= [tex]\frac{6}{\sqrt{2} }[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
sides a = b
[tex]6^{2} =a^{2} +a^{2}[/tex]
[tex]6^{2} =2a^{2}[/tex]
[tex]a^{2}= \frac{6^{2} }{2} =\frac{36}{2} =18[/tex]
[tex]a=\sqrt{18} =4.24=\sqrt{(9)(2)} =\frac{6}{\sqrt{2} }[/tex]
Hope this helps
Managerial Accounting
Answer:
1400 units
$26,600
1700 units
$32,300
Step-by-step explanation:
yw :))
A firm operated at 80% of capacity for the past year, during which fixed costs were $197,000, variable costs were 70% of sales, and sales were $900,000. Operating profit was
a.$73,000
b.$630,000
c.$58,400
d.$270,000
The correct answer is option A which is the operating profit will be $73000.
What is an expression?Expression in maths is defined as the collection of the numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
Given that:-
A firm operated at 80% of capacity for the past year, during which fixed costs were $197,000, variable costs were 70% of sales, and sales were $900,000.We will consider the following notations and will make the expression for operating profit.
P = profit
S = sales = $900000
F = Fixed cost = $197000
V = 07S = variable cost
So the expression will be given as:-
P = S - F - V
P = S - F - 0.7S
P = 9000000 - 1797000 - ( 0.7 x 9000000)
P = 703000 - 630000
P = $73000
Therefore the correct answer is option A which is the operating profit will be $73000.
To know more about Expression follow
https://brainly.com/question/723406
#SPJ1
Given any two events, E, and E₂, what does the probability P(E, U E₂) represent?
Answer:
P(E1 ∪ E2) = P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 ∩ E2)
Step-by-step explanation:
As we know that, if A and B are two events then
P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B)
⇒ P(E1 ∪ E2) = P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 ∩ E2)
three-quarters of a pile of bricks were used for a certain project. when two thirds of the reminder had been used, 50 bricks were left. how many bricks were there in the original pile?
Answer:
sorry I don't know the answer
Seismology In 1812, an earthquake of magnitude 7.9 shook New Madrid,
Missouri. Compare the amount of energy released by that earthquake to the
amount of energy released by each earthquake below.
magnitude 9.5 in Valdivia, Chile, in 1960
In the 30-60-90 triangle below, side s has a length of.
length of
30
90⁰
S
10
60"
A. 5.2: 5.2
B. 5,10,3
and side q has a
Answer: C, 5, 5√3
Step-by-step explanation:
The short leg of a 30-60-90 triangle equal half the hypotenuse, 10/2 = 5. The long leg equals √3 times the short leg, 5*√3 = 5√3.
❗️URGENT❗️
Chase has won 80% of the 30 football video games he has played with his brother, Jacob. If Chase and Jacob continue to play the video game, how many more games in a row goes Chase have to win to achieve an 85% win percentage?
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
24/30 = 0.8
24+x/30+x =0.85
10=x
If you want more clarification just ask
Total games Chase has to win in a row to achieve an 85% win percentage would be 10.
We can write the total number game won by Chase as -
w = 80% of 30
w = 80/100 x 30
w = 4/5 x 30
w = 24
Assume that he wins {x} games after winning 24 games to achieve 85% win percentage. Now, we can write that out of (30 + x) number of games played, Chase won (24 + x) games to achieve 85% win percentage. So, we can write that -
(24 + x)/(30 + x) = 85/100
(24 + x)/(30 + x) = 0.85
(24 + x) = 0.85(30 + x)
24 + x = 25.5 + 0.85x
0.15x = 1.5
x = 10
Total games Chase has to win in a row to achieve an 85% win percentage would be 10.
To solve more questions on percentage, visit the link below-
https://brainly.com/question/19034579
#SPJ2
quest
The chart shows how many people have signed up to go on a field trip each day. 62 students are allowed to go on the field trip. On
which day would you expect that number to be reached?
D)
10
Days People
1
26
2
30
3
34
4
38
5
42
6 46
og php?totalQuestions-10&testid-5
strand-5716&element-18789&condition-random #
Answer:
Day 5 ................
In 2010, the amount in Raja's account was 40 Lakhs. He debited 8000 in 2011, and in 2012, he debited 2,07,000. In 2013, he credited 1,16,000, and in 2014 he credited 12,000. How much more he has to credit to be worth what it was at at the start of 2010
How much more he has to credit to be worth what it was at at the start of 2010 is: 3,657,000.
Additional credit amountFirsts step
Total amount debited=8,000+207,000
Total amount debited=215,000
Total amount credited=116,000+12,000
Total amount credited=128,000
Second step
Additional amount to credit:
40 Lakhs is 4,000,000
Hence:
Additional amount to credit=4,000,000- (215,000+128,000)
Additional amount to credit=4,000,000-343,000
Additional amount to credit=
Therefore how much more he has to credit to be worth what it was at at the start of 2010 is: 3,657,000.
Learn more about Additional credit amount here:https://brainly.com/question/26867415
#SPJ1
Solve the equation.
6(x−1)6/7=12
Answer:
Linear Equations In One Variable =
[6(x-1)6] / 7 = 12
[(6x - 6)6] = 84
[36x - 36] = 84
36x = 84 + 36
36x = 120
x = 120/36
x = 10/3
equation solved (Answer : 10/3)
GOD PLEASE HELP!
Which of these is NOT a key factor that contributed to the financial crisis that started in 2007?
bond rating agencies giving CDOs very low ratings, discouraging investors to invest
highly leveraged investment accounts that magnified losses when bond prices decreased
excessive use of subprime mortgages to borrowers with poor credit
banks being incentivized to sell risky mortgages as mortgage-backed securities
Answer:
i think, bond rating agencies giving CDOs very low ratings, discouraging investors to invest
Step-by-step explanation:
PLEASEEEE PLEASEEEEEEEEE HELPPPPPPPPPP
how do i solve this equation?
Answer:
360
Step-by-step explanation:
using the definition
n [tex]P_{r}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{n!}{(n-r)!}[/tex]
where n! = n(n - 1)(n - 2)..... × 3 × 2 × 1
then
6[tex]P_{4}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{6!}{(6-4)!}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{6!}{2!}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{6(5)(4)(3(2)(1)}{2(1)}[/tex] ← cancel 2(1) on numerator / denominator
= 6 × 5 × 4 × 3
= 360
According to American Airlines, flight 71098 from New York to Los Angeles is on time 88.9% of the time. Assume that we randomly select 150 flights, use the normal approximation to the binomial to do the following:
a) approximately the probability that exactly 124 flights are on time.
b) approximate the probability that between 113 and 130 flights ,inclusive, are on time.
Using the normal approximation to the binomial, it is found that the probabilities are given as follows:
a) 0.0055 = 0.55%.
b) 0.2296 = 22.96%.
Normal Probability DistributionThe z-score of a measure X of a normally distributed variable with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex] is given by:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
The z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is above or below the mean. Looking at the z-score table, the p-value associated with this z-score is found, which is the percentile of X.The binomial distribution is the probability of x successes on n trials, with p probability of a success on each trial. It can be approximated to the normal distribution with [tex]\mu = np, \sigma = \sqrt{np(1-p)}[/tex].The parameters of the binomial distribution are given as follows:
n = 150, p = 0.889.
Hence the mean and the standard deviation of the approximation are:
[tex]\mu = E(X) = np = 150 x 0.889 = 133.35[/tex].[tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{150(0.889)(0.111)} = 3.8473[/tex]Item a:
Using continuity correction, the probability is P(123.5 < X < 124.5), which is the p-value of Z when X = 124.5 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 123.5, hence:
X = 124.5:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{124.5 - 133.35}{3.8473}[/tex]
Z = -2.3
Z = -2.3 has a p-value of 0.0107.
X = 123.5:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{123.5 - 133.35}{3.8473}[/tex]
Z = -2.56
Z = -2.56 has a p-value of 0.0052.
Hence the probability is 0.0107 - 0.0052 = 0.0055 = 0.55%.
Item b:
The probability is P(112.5 < X < 130.5), which is the p-value of Z when X = 130.5 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 112.5, hence:
X = 130.5:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{130.5 - 133.35}{3.8473}[/tex]
Z = -0.74
Z = -0.74 has a p-value of 0.2296.
X = 112.5:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]Z = \frac{112.5 - 133.35}{3.8473}[/tex]
Z = -5.42
Z = -5.42 has a p-value of 0.
Hence the probability is 0.2296 - 0 = 0.2296 = 22.96%.
More can be learned about the normal approximation to the binomial at https://brainly.com/question/14424710
#SPJ1
Which of the following best describes the set of complex numbers?
OA. The set of all numbers of the form a+bi, where a and bare any
real numbers and i equals -1
B. The set of all numbers of the form abi, where a and bare any real
numbers and i equals 1
C. The set of all numbers of the form a+bi, where a and b are any
real numbers and i equals √-1
OD. The set of all numbers of the form abi, where a and b are any real
numbers and / equals -1
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct statement is option C.
What is complex number?A real number and an imaginary number are effectively combined to create a complex number. The complex number is written as a+ib, where a and ib are real and imaginary numbers, respectively. Additionally, i = √-1 and both a and b are real numbers.
Since we know that
Complex number is of the form a+ib
Where,
a is real number belongs to real axis
And b is also a real number belongs to imaginary axis.
And the value of i = √-1
Thus,
The set of all numbers of the form a+bi, where a and b are any
real numbers and i equals √-1 is the correct statement.
To learn more about complex numbers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27940074
#SPJ7
the segments ab and cd are graphed on a coordinate plane. The endpoints of ab are at (9,4) and (9,20). CD is parallel to the x-axis, and one of its endpoints is at (5,8). if ab=cd and cd is entirely in the first quadrant, what is the other endpoint of cd
Answer:
21, 8
Step-by-step explanation:
The second endpoint is of the form (X, 8) since it's parallel to the x axis.
Given the congruence of the two segments, we can tell that its length is 16 units (since [tex]|4-20| = |-16|= 16[/tex])
At this point the two possible endpoints for the segment are [tex](5-16; 8)[/tex] or [tex](5+16, 8)[/tex]. The fact that the segment has to sit in the first quadrant rules out the first option (it's endpoint will be at (-11, 8) which will set most of it in the second quadrant) and we're left with (21, 8)
A line of best fit was drawn for 16 data points. What is the maximum number
of these data points that may not actually be on the line?
OA. 14
OB. 13
O C. 15
OD. 16
The maximum number of data points that may not actually be on the line is 16. so, the correct option is D.
How to find the line of best fit?We know that a line of best fit is basically a straight line drawn for a given data that may or may not pass through data points.
It is given that the line is drawn for 16 data points.
Hence, the line may or may not pass through all these 16 points.
Therefore, the maximum number of data points that may not actually be on the line is 16.
so, the correct option is D.
Learn more about line here;
https://brainly.com/question/10165160
#SPJ1
Hi can someone please help me with this geometry problem? Thanks!
A triangle is a three-edged polygon with three vertices. It is a fundamental form in geometry.
What is a triangle?A triangle is a three-edged polygon with three vertices. It is a fundamental form in geometry. The sum of all the angles of a triangle is always equal to 180°.
The triangles ΔEST and ΔEFD are similar triangles, therefore, we can write,
[tex]\dfrac{ES}{EF} = \dfrac{ET}{ED} = \dfrac{ST}{FD}[/tex]
Since S and T are midpoints of EF and ED, the lines will be divided into two equal parts. Therefore,
[tex]\dfrac{ES}{EF} = \dfrac{ET}{ED} = \dfrac{ST}{FD}= \dfrac12[/tex]
Therefore, we can write it as,
[tex]FD = 2 (ST)[/tex]
In ΔEST and ΔTDR
∠T ≅ ∠T {Vertical angles}
ET ≅ TD {T is the midpoint of ED}
∠SET ≅ ∠TDR {Alternate interior angles}
Therefore, ΔEST ≅ ΔTDR.
Since the two triangles are equal we can write,
ST ≅ TR
Further, it can be written as,
FD = 2(ST)
FD = ST + ST
FD = ST + TR
FD = SR
Hence, FD≅SR.
Learn more about Triangle:
https://brainly.com/question/2773823
#SPJ1
If f(x)=x+2 and g(x)=x2+1 find:a. f(g(x)) b. g(f(x))
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x² + 3 and x² + 4x + 5
Step-by-step explanation:
(a)
to find f(g(x)) substitute x = g(x) into f(x)
f(g(x))
= f(x² + 1)
= x² + 1 + 2
= x² + 3
(b)
to find g(f(x)) substitute x = f(x) into g(x)
g(f(x))
= g(x + 2)
= (x + 2)² + 1 ← expand factor using FOIL
= x² + 4x + 4 + 1
= x² + 4x + 5
easy:
Clara buy: 300 apples, 74 potato, 15 eggs e 2 phone.
how many things did he buy in all?
Hard:
There are 92 boys in a school, the girl 100.How many more girl are there than boys?
Answer:
easy = 391 items
hard = there are 8 more girls than there are boys
Which absolute value functions will be narrower than the parent function, f(x) = |x|? Check all that apply.
f(x) = |x|
f(x) = |x – 2|
f(x) = |x| + 3
f(x) = 2.9|x|
f(x) = 1.2|x + 8|
f(x) = 0.7|x| – 3.2
The correct answer is option 4 which is f(x) = 2.9|x| is narrower than the parent function f(x) = |x|
What is a function?A function is defined as the expression that set up the relationship between the dependent variable and independent variable.
Given parent function is f(x)=|x|
Now we have to find which function from given choices will be narrower than the parent function.
Notice that adding or subtracting some number from the parent function only shifts the graph up, down, and left of the right side.
But that will not make the function narrower or broader.
So f(x) = |x – 2| and f(x) = |x| + 3, can't be the answer.
Multiplying by some positive real number which is more than 1, makes the function narrower.
Only f(x) = 2.9|x| from remaining choices fits that case.
Hence correct answer is option 4 which is f(x) = 2.9|x| is narrower than the parent function f(x) = |x|
To know more about functions follow
https://brainly.com/question/2833285
#SPJ1
Answer:
D,E
Step-by-step explanation:
How to solve this one
Please step by step
Answer: 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Dividing the numerator and denominator by x, we get the limit is equal to:
[tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{-\sqrt{1+\frac{5}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}}+3}{4+\frac{7}{x}}\\\\=\frac{\lim_{x \to -\infty} \left(-\sqrt{1+\frac{5}{x}+\frac{1}{x^2}}+3 \right)}{\lim_{x \to -\infty} \left(4+\frac{7}{x} \right)}\\\\=\frac{2}{4}=\boxed{1/2}[/tex]
What is the range of the function g(x) = –3sec(2x + 4) – 1?
(–∞, –2] ∪ [0, ∞)
(–∞, –4] ∪ [0, ∞)
(–∞, –4] ∪ [2, ∞)
(–∞, –5] ∪ [1, ∞)
The range of the function g(x) will be (–∞, –4] ∪ [2, ∞). Option C is correct.
What is the difference between domain and range?The domain denotes all potential x values, while the range denotes all possible y values.
When we plot the graph of the given function we will get the maximum and the minimum value till we get the function plot. The difference in the value of those coordinates is the range of the function.
The range of the function g(x) will be (–∞, –4] ∪ [2, ∞).
Hence option C is correct.
To learn more about domain and range, refer to https://brainly.com/question/1632425.
#SPJ1
The power 3 Superscript negative 3 equals StartFraction 1 Over 27 EndFraction . Which expression is equivalent to 3 Superscript negative 3?
Applying the negative exponent, the equivalent expression [tex]3^{-3}[/tex] is 1/27.
What are exponents?The exponents of a number are defined as the representation of a number that shows how many times a number is multiplied by itself.
When we have a negative exponent, we use a fraction, with the term with the exponent going to the denominator.
Hence, the equivalent expression is:
[tex]3^{-3} = \dfrac{1}{3^3} = \dfrac{1}{27}[/tex]
More can be learned about exponents at
brainly.com/question/1773695
#SPJ1
Can anyone solve this problem ?
Answer:
defectionist forme solb ifv
which equation has the solution x=6
Answer:
need more info
Step-by-step explanation:
what I can tell you is that when you change all the x's in the equation to 6s, both sides of the equation will equal eachother.
Please help quick!!
Answer:
the answer will be similar, because if you divide 2, 3, 2.25 by 3 you will get the answer.
Somebody please assist me here
The base case of [tex]n=1[/tex] is trivially true, since
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^1 E_i\right) = P(E_1) = \sum_{i=1}^1 P(E_i)[/tex]
but I think the case of [tex]n=2[/tex] may be a bit more convincing in this role. We have by the inclusion/exclusion principle
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) = P(E_1 \cup E_2) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) = P(E_1) + P(E_2) - P(E_1 \cap E_2) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) \le P(E_1) + P(E_2) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^2 P(E_i)[/tex]
with equality if [tex]E_1\cap E_2=\emptyset[/tex].
Now assume the case of [tex]n=k[/tex] is true, that
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^k P(E_i)[/tex]
We want to use this to prove the claim for [tex]n=k+1[/tex], that
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} P(E_i)[/tex]
The I/EP tells us
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) = P\left(\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \cup E_{k+1}\right) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) = P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1}) - P\left(\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \cap E_{k+1}\right)[/tex]
and by the same argument as in the [tex]n=2[/tex] case, this leads to
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) = P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1}) - P\left(\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \cap E_{k+1}\right) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1})[/tex]
By the induction hypothesis, we have an upper bound for the probability of the union of the [tex]E_1[/tex] through [tex]E_k[/tex]. The result follows.
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1}) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^k P(E_i) + P(E_{k+1}) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} P(E_i)[/tex]
can someone find the value of x?
Answer:
[tex]\boxed{\sf x=12}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
By applying Similar Triangles Theorem:-
[tex]\sf \cfrac{x}{6} =\cfrac{6}{3}[/tex]
We'll multiply both sides of the equation by 6, the LCM of 6,3.
[tex]\sf x=2 \times 6[/tex]
[tex]\sf x=12[/tex]
Match the scatter plot with its description
weak and positive
moderate and negative
strong and negative
strong and positive
weak and negative
moderate and positive
