The level of significance, often denoted as α (alpha), is a predetermined threshold used in hypothesis testing to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
The null hypothesis (H₀) is a statement of no effect or no difference between groups or variables being compared. It is what we aim to test and potentially reject. The alternative hypothesis (H₁ or Ha) is the opposite of the null hypothesis and represents the researcher's claim or the effect they believe exists. The level of significance is the predetermined threshold used to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis represents no effect or no difference, while the alternative hypothesis represents the researcher's claim or the effect they believe exists.
Learn more about significance here : brainly.com/question/28073266
#SPJ11
FOUNTAINS The path of water sprayed from a fountain is modeled by h = -4.9² +58. 8r, where h is the height of the water in meters after t seconds. Determine the maximum height of the water and the am
The maximum height of the water is 176.4 meters, and it takes 6 seconds to reach that height.
The path of water sprayed from a fountain is modeled by the equation h = -4.9t² +58.8t. Here, h is the height of the water in meters after t seconds. To determine the maximum height of the water and the amount of time it takes to reach that height, we need to find the vertex of the parabolic path of the water sprayed from the fountain. The maximum height will be the y-coordinate of the vertex while the time it takes to reach that height will be the x-coordinate of the vertex. We can use the formula -b/2a to find the x-coordinate of the vertex of the parabola.
The equation h = -4.9t² +58.8t can be written as h = -4.9(t² -12t)
Completing the square, we get h = -4.9(t² -12t + 36 - 36) h = -4.9[(t - 6)² - 36] h = -4.9(t - 6)² + 176.4
Comparing this with the standard vertex form of a parabola, y = a(x - h)² + k, we see that the vertex of the parabola is (6, 176.4).
More on height: https://brainly.com/question/11652901
#SPJ11
Let g(x) = 5x? - 2. (a) Find the average rate of change from - 4 to 3. (b) Find an equation of the secant line containing (-4, 9(-4)) and (3. g(3)). (a) The average rate of change from - 4 to 3 is (Simplify your answer.)
The average rate of change from - 4 to 3 is 5 and the equation of the secant line containing (-4, 9(-4)) and (3, g(3)) is y = 7x + 53.
a. The average rate of change from -4 to 3:
We are given a function, g(x) = 5x−2.The average rate of change of a function is found by finding the difference between the values of the function at two points divided by the difference between the points.
Let's use the endpoints -4 and 3.
Hence, we obtain:(g(3) - g(-4))/(3 - (-4))
We can simplify the above expression as follows:
g(3) = 5(3)−2
= 13g(-4)
= 5(-4)−2
= -22(g(3) - g(-4))/(3 - (-4))
= (13 - (-22))/(3 + 4)
= 35/7
Therefore, the average rate of change from -4 to 3 is 5.
b. Equation of the secant line containing (-4, 9(-4)) and (3, g(3)):
We can use the formula y-y₁ = m(x-x₁) to find the equation of a line where (x₁, y₁) and (x, y) are two points on the line and m is the slope.
Since we have two points (-4, 9(-4)) and (3, g(3)), we can find the slope of the line using the formula
(y₂-y₁)/(x₂-x₁).
Therefore,
m = (g(3) - 9(-4))/(3 - (-4))
= (13 + 36)/(3 + 4)
= 7
Using the point-slope form, we can write the equation of the line as:
y - 9(-4) = 7(x - (-4))
Simplifying the above expression we get,
y = 7x + 53
Therefore, the equation of the secant line containing (-4, 9(-4)) and (3, g(3)) is y = 7x + 53.
Thus, the average rate of change from - 4 to 3 is 5 and the equation of the secant line containing (-4, 9(-4)) and (3, g(3)) is y = 7x + 53.
To know more about secant line visit:
brainly.com/question/30162655
#SPJ11
3. (Polynomial-time verifies, 20pt) Show that the following two computational problems have polynomial-time verifies; to do so explicitly state what the certificate cc is in each case, and what VV does to verify it. a) [10pt] SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS = {(SS, SS): SS contains SS as a subgraph}. (See Section 0.2 for definition of subgraph.) b)[10pt] EEEE_DDDDVV={(SS):SS is equally dividable} Here we call a set SS of integers equally dividable if SS = SS USS for two disjoint sets SS, SS such that the sum of the elements in SS is the same as the sum of the elements in SS. E.g. {-3,4, 5,7,9} is equally dividable as SS = {3, 5, 9} and SS = {4,7} but SS = {1, 4, 9} is not equally dividable.
The algorithm will then determine whether the given SS contains an SS subgraph or not, again in polynomial time.
a) The certificate cc is an SS subgraph in SS.
The verification process VV checks that SS contains an SS subgraph.
The algorithm for verification VV for SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS should be able to determine in polynomial time whether the input pair is a part of the set or not.
The algorithm will then determine whether the given SS contains an SS subgraph or not, again in polynomial time.
Know more about algorithm here:
https://brainly.com/question/24953880
#SPJ11
Identify each parameterized surface:
(a) 7(u, v) = (vcosu, vsinu, 4v) for 0 ≤u≤π and 0 ≤v≤3
(b) 7(u, v) = (u, v, 2u+ 3v-1) for 1 ≤u≤ 3 and 2 ≤ v≤ 4
The parameterized surface given by 7(u, v) = (vcosu, vsinu, 4v) for 0 ≤u≤π and 0 ≤v≤3 represents a portion of a helical surface.
It is a helix that spirals around the z-axis with a radius of v and extends vertically along the z-axis with a height of 4v. The parameter u determines the angle at which the helix wraps around the z-axis, while the parameter v determines the height of the helix.
The parameterized surface given by 7(u, v) = (u, v, 2u+ 3v-1) for 1 ≤u≤ 3 and 2 ≤ v≤ 4 represents a tilted plane in three-dimensional space. It is a plane that is slanted in the direction of both the x-axis and the y-axis.
The parameters u and v determine the coordinates of points on the plane, with u controlling the position along the x-axis and v controlling the position along the y-axis. The equation 2u+ 3v-1 determines the height or z-coordinate of each point on the plane.
Learn more about parametric surfaces here: brainly.com/question/32623162
#SPJ11
An airliner comes 400 passengers and has doors with a height of 75 Heights of men are normally distributed with a mean of 600 in and a standard deviation of 2.8 in Complete parts (a) through of)
a. If a mile passenger is randomly selected, find the probability that he can fit through the doorway without bending
The probability
(Round to four decimal places as needed)
b. if that of the 400 passengers im men, find the probability that the mean height of the 200 men is less than 75
The probati
(Round to four decimal places as needed)
When considering the comfort and safety of passengers, which result is more relevant the probably from part (a) of the probability from part by Why?
OA. The probably from part is more relevant because it shows the proportion of male passengers that will not need to bend
OB. The probability from part (a) is more relevant because it shows the proportion of fights where the mean height of the male passengers will be less than the door height
OC. The probability from part (0 is more relevant because shows the proportion of male passengers that will not need to bend
OD. The probability from part (b) is more relevant because it shows the proportion of fights where the mean height of the male passengers will be less than the door height.
d. When considering the comfort and safety of passengers, why are woman ignored in this case?
OA. There is no adequate reason to ignore women. A separate statistical analysis should be carried out for the case of women
OB Since men are generally taller than women, it is more affioult for them to bend when entering the arcraft. Therefore, it is more important that men not have to bend than it is important that women not have to bend
OC Since men are generally taller than women, a design that accommodates a sulable proportion of men will necessarily accommodate a greater proportion of women
The probability from part (a) is more relevant because it shows the proportion of male passengers who will not need to bend to fit through the doorway. Ignoring women in this case is not justified, as a separate statistical analysis should be carried out for women to ensure their comfort and safety.
(a) The probability from part (a) is more relevant because it directly addresses the comfort and safety of individual male passengers. By calculating the probability that a randomly selected male passenger can fit through the doorway without bending, we obtain a measure of the proportion of male passengers who will not face any inconvenience while boarding the aircraft. This information is crucial for ensuring passenger comfort and avoiding potential accidents or injuries during the boarding process.
(b) The probability from part (b) does not directly reflect the comfort and safety of individual passengers. Instead, it focuses on the mean height of a group of male passengers. While it provides information about the proportion of flights where the mean height of male passengers is less than the door height, it does not account for variations among individual passengers. The comfort and safety of passengers are better assessed by considering the probability from part (a) that addresses the needs of individual male passengers.
Ignoring women in this case is not justified. It is important to recognize that both men and women travel on airliners, and their comfort and safety should be equally prioritized. Since men are generally taller than women, it might be more challenging for them to bend when entering the aircraft. However, this does not negate the need to consider women's comfort as well. A separate statistical analysis should be conducted for women to determine their specific requirements and ensure that the design accommodates a suitable proportion of both men and women passengers. Ignoring women would disregard their unique needs and potentially compromise their comfort and safety during the boarding process.
To learn more about probability click here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
In a poker hand consisting of 5 cards, find the probability of holding (a) 2 tens; (b) 3 clubs and 2 red cards. (a) (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (b) (Round to four decimal places as neede
The probability of holding 2 tens in a poker hand consisting of 5 cards is approximately 0.0036.B. The probability of holding 3 clubs and 2 red cards in a poker hand consisting of 5 cards is approximately 0.0778.
(a) To calculate the probability of holding 2 tens, we first determine the total number of possible 5-card hands, which is denoted by C(52, 5) or "52 choose 5". Next, we need to determine the number of favorable outcomes, which is the number of ways to choose 2 tens from the 4 available tens and 3 cards from the remaining 48 cards in the deck. Thus, the probability is given by the ratio of favorable outcomes to total outcomes.
(b) To calculate the probability of holding 3 clubs and 2 red cards, we again start by determining the total number of possible 5-card hands. Then, we count the number of ways to choose 3 clubs from the 13 available clubs and 2 red cards from the remaining 26 red cards in the deck. The probability is then calculated as the ratio of favorable outcomes to total outcomes.
By using the principles of combinatorics and probability, we can compute these probabilities and find that the probability of holding 2 tens is approximately 0.0036, while the probability of holding 3 clubs and 2 red cards is approximately 0.0778.
Learn more about probability here:
brainly.com/question/32004014
#SPJ11
Determine whether the following problems are initial-value or boundary- value problems: (a). -3; w(0)-w(1)-0; d²y (0)-² (1)-0. dx (b). y"+y=0; y(0) = 0; y(1) = 0.
Both problems (a) and (b) are boundary-value problems as they involve specifying conditions at the boundaries of the interval on which the function is defined.
The given problems can be classified as follows:
(a) -3; w(0)-w(1)-0; d²y (0)-² (1)-0. dx: This problem is a boundary-value problem. It involves specifying conditions or constraints on the solution at different points (in this case, at the boundaries x = 0 and x = 1). The conditions w(0) - w(1) = 0 and d²y(0)/dx² - d²y(1)/dx² = 0 are boundary conditions that must be satisfied by the solution.
(b) y"+y=0; y(0) = 0; y(1) = 0: This problem is also a boundary-value problem. The differential equation y" + y = 0 represents the equation governing the behavior of the unknown function y(x). The conditions y(0) = 0 and y(1) = 0 are the boundary conditions that specify the values of y at the boundaries x = 0 and x = 1.
To know more about initial-value, click here: brainly.com/question/17613893
#SPJ11.
Lucky Larry wins $1,000,000 in a state lottery. The standard way in which the state pays such lottery winnings is at a constant rate of $40,000 per year for 25 years. Round your answer to the nearest. If Lucky invests each payment from the state at 6% compounded continuously, what is the accumulated future value of the income stream? What is the accumulated present value of the income stream at 6%, compounded continuously? (This amount represents what the state has to invest at the start of its lottery payments, assuming the 6% interest rate holds.)
The accumulated present value of the income stream is approximately $312,489.47.To calculate the accumulated future value of the income stream, we can use the formula for continuous compound interest:[tex]A = P * e^(rt)[/tex]
where A is the accumulated future value, P is the principal (annual payment), e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828), r is the interest rate, and t is the time (number of years).
In this case, the annual payment is $40,000, the interest rate is 6% (or 0.06 as a decimal), and the time is 25 years.Plugging in the values into the formula, we have: [tex]A = 40000 * e^(0.06 * 25)[/tex]
Using a calculator, we can calculate the value of [tex]e^(0.06 * 25)[/tex] to be approximately 3.200120949.
A = 40000 * 3.200120949 which values to $128,004.84. Therefore, the accumulated future value of the income stream is approximately $128,004.84.
To calculate the accumulated present value of the income stream, we can use the formula for continuous compound interest in reverse:
[tex]P = A / e^(rt)[/tex]
In this case, the accumulated future value is $1,000,000, the interest rate is 6% (or 0.06 as a decimal), and the time is 25 years.Plugging in the values into the formula, we have: [tex]P = 1000000 / e^(0.06 * 25)[/tex]
Using a calculator, we can calculate the value of [tex]e^(0.06 * 25)[/tex]to be approximately 3.200120949.
P = 1000000 / 3.200120949 which values to $312,489.47. Therefore, the accumulated present value of the income stream is approximately $312,489.47.
To know more about continuous compound interest visit-
brainly.com/question/30761870
#SPJ11
Given the following output from Excel comparing two sets of exam scores, which statement is correct;
a There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis Reject the null hypothesis as t stat is lower than the critical value.
b The p-value is greater than alpha thus reject the null hypothesis
c Cannot make a conclusion as t stat is negative and other values are positive.
d Reject the null hypothesis as t stat is lower than the critical value
Based on the given information, statement (d) is correct. The null hypothesis should be rejected because the t statistic is lower than the critical value.
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis represents the assumption of no significant difference or relationship between variables. To determine whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis, statistical tests are conducted, such as t-tests.
The critical value is a threshold used to compare with the test statistic to make a decision. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In statement (d), it is stated that the t statistic is lower than the critical value, which means it does not exceed the threshold. Therefore, the null hypothesis should be rejected.
The p-value is another important factor in hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of obtaining the observed data or more extreme data if the null hypothesis is true. In statement (b), it mentions that the p-value is greater than alpha (the significance level). When the p-value is larger than the chosen significance level, typically set at 0.05 or 0.01, it suggests that the observed data is likely to occur by chance, and the null hypothesis should be rejected. However, the given options do not provide information about the specific p-value or alpha, so statement (b) cannot be determined as the correct choice.
Statement (a) suggests that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Without knowing the specific critical value or significance level, it is not possible to determine whether the evidence is sufficient or not. Additionally, statement (c) is incorrect as it implies that the t statistic being negative or positive has a direct impact on the decision to reject the null hypothesis, which is not the case.
Therefore, based on the given options, statement (d) is the correct choice, indicating that the null hypothesis should be rejected because the t statistic is lower than the critical value.
Learn more about null hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/30821298
#SPJ11
Graph Of The Function (x)=2x −1 At The Point Where X = 0. Find The Equation Of The Tangent Line To The Curve y=x +x Which Is Parallel To y=3x. Leave All Values In Exact Form (No Decimals).
(Show work)
Find an equation for the tangent line to the graph of the function (x)=2x −1 at the
point where x = 0.
Find the equation of the tangent line to the curve y=x +x which is parallel to y=3x. Leave all values in exact form (no decimals).
To find the equation of the tangent line to the curve of the function f(x) = 2x - 1 at the point where x = 0, we need to find the slope of the tangent line and the point of tangency.
The equation of the tangent line to the curve y = x + x which is parallel to y = 3x is y = 3x.
1. Slope of the tangent line:
The slope of the tangent line is equal to the derivative of the function f(x) at the given point. Taking the derivative of f(x) = 2x - 1:
f'(x) = 2
2. Point of tangency:
The point of tangency is the point on the curve that corresponds to x = 0. Evaluating the function f(x) at x = 0:
f(0) = 2(0) - 1 = -1
Therefore, the point of tangency is (0, -1).
Now we have the slope of the tangent line (m = 2) and the point of tangency (0, -1).
The equation of a line in point-slope form is given by y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is a point on the line and m is the slope.
Substituting the values into the equation, we get:
y - (-1) = 2(x - 0)
Simplifying the equation:
y + 1 = 2x
This is the equation of the tangent line to the graph of f(x) = 2x - 1 at the point where x = 0.
To find the equation of the tangent line to the curve y = x + x which is parallel to y = 3x, we need to find the slope of the curve and then use that slope to find the equation.
1. Slope of the curve:
The slope of the curve y = x + x is equal to the coefficient of x, which is 1 + 1 = 2.
2. Parallel tangent line:
Since the given tangent line is parallel to y = 3x, it will have the same slope of 3.
Using the slope-intercept form of a line (y = mx + b), where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept, we can substitute the slope (m = 3) and a point on the curve (0, 0) to find the equation of the parallel tangent line.
y = 3x + b
Substituting the point (0, 0):
0 = 3(0) + b
0 = 0 + b
b = 0
To know more about tangent lines, click here: brainly.com/question/12648495
#SPJ11
Test the claim that the proportion of people who own cats is significantly different than 40% at the 0.05 significance level. The null and alternative hypothesis would be: H:p=0.4 H: x = 0.4 H :p = 0.4 H :p = 0.4 H: = 0.4 H:n = 0.4 H:p < 0.4 H: * 0.4 H :P +0.4 H :p > 0.4 H:n <0.4 H: > 0.4 O O O The test is: right-tailed two-tailed left-tailed O Based on a sample of 600 people, 270 owned cats The p-value is: (to 4 decimal places) Based on this we: Fail to reject the null hypothesis O Reject the null hypothesis
The test is two-tailed, and the p-value cannot be determined without additional information or calculation.
The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Null hypothesis: H₀: p = 0.4 (proportion of people who own cats is 40%)
Alternative hypothesis: H₁: p ≠ 0.4 (proportion of people who own cats is significantly different than 40%)
The test is: two-tailed (since the alternative hypothesis is stating a significant difference, not specifying a particular direction)
Based on a sample of 600 people, with 270 owning cats, the p-value is calculated, and depending on its value:
If the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
If the p-value is greater than or equal to the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
(Note: The p-value cannot be determined without additional information or calculation.)
To know more about two-tailed test,
https://brainly.com/question/29367034
#SPJ11
Baruch bookstore is interested in how much, on average, you spend each semester on textbooks. It randomly picks up 1,000 students and calculate their average spending on textbooks. What are the population, sample, parameter, statistic, variable and data in this example? • Population: • Sample: • Parameter: • Statistic: • Variable: • Data: Is this data or variable numerical or categorical? If numerical, is it discrete or continuous? If categorical, is it ordinal or non-ordinal? Please explain your answer.
Regarding the nature of the variable, it is numerical since it involves measuring the amount of money spent. It is also continuous since the amount spent can take on any value within a range of possibilities.
Population: The population in this example refers to the entire group or set of individuals that the study is focused on, which is the total number of students who spend money on textbooks each semester.
Sample: The sample is a subset of the population that is selected for the study. In this case, the sample consists of the 1,000 randomly chosen students from the population.
Parameter: A parameter is a characteristic or measure that describes the entire population. In this example, a parameter could be the average spending on textbooks for all students in the population.
Statistic: A statistic is a characteristic or measure that describes the sample. In this example, a statistic would be the average spending on textbooks calculated from the data of the 1,000 students in the sample.
Variable: The variable is the characteristic or attribute that is being measured or observed in the study. In this case, the variable is the amount of money spent on textbooks each semester by the students.
Data: Data refers to the values or observations collected for the variable. In this example, the data would be the individual spending amounts on textbooks for each student in the sample.
Learn more about Population : brainly.com/question/15889243
#SPJ11
Select the cost of the best alternative. MARR=10% per year. Use 2 decimal places after dot for the values you take from interest rate table.
A
B
Initial Cost, $
-25000
-32000
Annual Cost, $/year
-9000
-7000
Annual Revenue, $/year
3200
1900
Deposit Return, $
5000
9000
n, years
4
Select one:
O a. 40047
Ob. 41986
O c. 39986
Od. 42047
Oe. 35691
To select the cost of the best alternative, we need to calculate the Present Worth (PW) of each alternative and choose the one with the lowest PW. The Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return (MARR) is given as 10% per year.
Let's calculate the PW for each alternative:
Alternative A:
Initial Cost: -$25,000
Annual Cost: -$9,000
Annual Revenue: $3,200
Deposit Return: $5,000
n: 4 years
The PW of Alternative A can be calculated as follows:
[tex]PW(A) = \text{Initial Cost} + \text{Annual Cost}(P/A, 10\%, 4) + \text{Annual Revenue}(P/G, 10\%, 4) + \text{Deposit Return}(P/F, 10\%, 4)\\\\= -25000 + (-9000)(P/A, 10\%, 4) + (3200)(P/G, 10\%, 4) + (5000)(P/F, 10\%, 4)[/tex]
Using the interest rate table, we can find the factors:
[tex]P/A, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/G, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/F, 10\%, 4 = 0.68301 \\[/tex]
Substituting these values into the equation:
[tex]PW(A) = -25000 + (-9000)(3.16986) + (3200)(3.16986) + (5000)(0.68301) \\= -25000 - 28529.74 + 10156.99 + 3415.05 \\= -\$39957.70[/tex]
Alternative B:
Initial Cost: -$32,000
Annual Cost: -$7,000
Annual Revenue: $1,900
Deposit Return: $9,000
n: 4 years
Using the same approach, we can calculate the PW of Alternative B:
[tex]PW(B) = -32000 + (-7000)(P/A, 10\%, 4) + (1900)(P/G, 10\%, 4) + (9000)(P/F, 10\%, 4)[/tex]
Using the interest rate table:
[tex]P/A, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/G, 10\%, 4 = 3.16986 \\P/F, 10\%, 4 = 0.68301 \\[/tex]
Substituting the values:
[tex]PW(B) = -32000 + (-7000)(3.16986) + (1900)(3.16986) + (9000)(0.68301) \\= -32000 - 22189.02 + 6010.74 + 6147.09 \\= -\$42031.19[/tex]
Comparing the PWs of the two alternatives, we see that PW(A) is -$39957.70 and PW(B) is -$42031.19. Since PW(A) has a lower value, the cost of the best alternative is -$39957.70.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
c. 39986
To know more about Value visit-
brainly.com/question/30760879
#SPJ11
Find the determinant of each of these
A = (6 0 3 9) det A =
B = (0 4 6 0) det B =
C = (2 3 3 -2) det C =
The
determinant
of
matrix
A is 54.
The determinant of matrix B is -24.
The determinant of matrix C is -13.
Determinant of each matrix A, B, and C are to be determined.
The given matrices are:
Matrix A = (6 0 3 9), Matrix B = (0 4 6 0), Matrix C = (2 3 3 -2).
We know that the determinant of the 2×2 matrix (a11a12a21a22) is given by |A| = (a11 × a22) – (a21 × a12). Now, we will find the determinant of each matrix one by one:
Determinant of matrix A:
det (A)=(6 x 9) - (0 x 3)
= 54 - 0
=54
Therefore, det (A) = 54.
Determinant of matrix B:
det (B) = (0 x 0) - (6 x 4)
= 0 - 24
= -24.
Therefore, det (B) = -24.
Determinant of matrix C:
det (C) = (2 x (-2)) - (3 x 3)
= -4 - 9
= -13.
Therefore, det (C) = -13
We know that the determinant of the 2×2 matrix (a11a12a21a22) is given by |A| = (a11 × a22) – (a21 × a12). Similarly, we can
calculate
the determinant of a 3×3 matrix by using a similar rule.
We can also calculate the determinant of an n×n matrix by using the
Laplace expansion
method, or by using row reduction method.
The determinant of a square matrix A is denoted by |A|. Determinant of a matrix is a scalar value.
If the determinant of a matrix is zero, then the matrix is said to be singular.
If the determinant of a matrix is non-zero, then the matrix is said to be
non-singular
.
Therefore, the determinants of matrices A, B, and C are 54, -24, and -13, respectively.
Learn more about determinant visit:
brainly.com/question/14405737
#SPJ11
Alice has shared that her RSA public key is
n = 33, e = 7. Her private key is d = 3. She was sent the encrypted
number 13. Decrypt the number.
Alice has shared that her RSA public key is n = 33, e = 7. Her private key is d = 3. She was sent the encrypted number 13. Decrypt the number.
To decrypt the number 13 using RSA encryption, we can use Alice's private key, which consists of the values n = 33 and d = 3. By raising the encrypted number to the power of d and taking the remainder when divided by n, we can obtain the decrypted number.
To decrypt the number 13 using RSA encryption, we need to use Alice's private key, which consists of the values n = 33 and d = 3.To decrypt the number, we raise the encrypted number (13) to the power of the private key exponent (d = 3) and take the remainder when divided by the modulus (n = 33). Mathematically, the decryption process can be represented as follows:
Decrypted number = (Encrypted number)^d mod n
Substituting the given values into the equation:
Decrypted number = (13^3) mod 33
Calculating 13 raised to the power of 3:
13^3 = 2197
Taking the remainder when 2197 is divided by 33:
2197 mod 33 = 13
Therefore, the decrypted number is 13. Hence, using Alice's private key, the number 13 can be decrypted successfully.
To learn more about RSA encryption click here
brainly.com/question/31673673
#SPJ11
Find y'. y=x²√6x-1 y'=0 (Type an exact answer, using radicals as needed.)
The derivative of y with respect to x, denoted as y', is equal to (3x^2 - 1)/(2√6x).
To find the derivative of y with respect to x (y'), we can use the power rule and the chain rule of differentiation. Let's break down the steps:
First, apply the power rule to differentiate x^2, which gives us 2x.
Next, we differentiate the expression √6x - 1 using the chain rule. The derivative of √6x with respect to x is (√6)/2√x, obtained by differentiating the inside function (6x) and multiplying it by the derivative of the inside function (1/2√x).
The derivative of -1 with respect to x is 0 since it is a constant.
Combining these results, we have y' = 2x * (√6)/2√x - 0 = (√6x)/(√x) = √6x.
Therefore, the derivative of y with respect to x, y', is equal to (3x^2 - 1)/(2√6x).
Learn more about Derivative click here :brainly.com/question/28376218
#SPJ11
Show that the solution of and can be obtained by solving and then using . Show also that these expressions are together algebraically equivalent to and provide an alternative way of calculating the Newton step .
Here where represents the solution to the minimization problem and is the gradient of the Lagrange equation with representing the Lagrange multipliers. is a quadratic model, denotes a matrix whose i-th row is , represents the constraints, here is the penalty parameter, and are parameter vectors that can approximate the Lagrange multipliers but not always
To show that the solution of the equations and can be obtained by solving and then using , we can follow these steps:
Solve the equation :
From the given information, we have a quadratic model and the constraints . We want to find the solution that minimizes the quadratic model subject to the constraints.
Calculate the gradient of the Lagrange equation:
[tex]L(x, \lambda) = f(x) - \lambda \cdot g(x)[/tex]
The Lagrange equation is given by . Taking the gradient of this equation with respect to the variables , we obtain the gradient as .
Solve the equation :
We want to find the solution that satisfies the equation , where represents the Lagrange multipliers. This equation arises from the optimality conditions of the constrained minimization problem.
Use the solution to calculate :
Substituting the solution obtained from step 3 into the equation , we can calculate the values of . This step involves using the parameter vectors that approximate the Lagrange multipliers.
By following these steps, we have shown that the solution of the equations and can be obtained by solving and then using . Furthermore, these expressions are algebraically equivalent to the alternative expressions and , providing an alternative way of calculating the Newton step.
To know more about Lagrange visit-
brainly.com/question/31583809
#SPJ11
Which function has a phase shift of to the right?
O A. y =
1
O B. y =
OC.
OD.
y: =
=
Y
y =
2 sin (x - π)
2 sin (1/x + π)
2 sin (2x
- T)
-
2 sin (x + 1)
The function has a phase shift of π/2 to the right is y = 2sin(2x - π).
What is a Phase Shift in Math?A phase shift in math is ahorizontal displacement of a graph.
The function y = 2sin(2x - π) has a phase shift of π/2 to the right because the graph of the function is shifted π/2units to the right ofthe graph of y = 2sin(2x).
In other words, the function y = 2sin(2x - π) reaches its maximum values π/2 units later than the function y = 2sin(2x).
Learn more about Phase Shift:
https://brainly.com/question/12588483
#SPJ1
prove the following statement. assume that all sets are subsets of a universal set u. for all sets a and b, if ac ⊆ b then a ∪ b = u.
We can say that "For all sets A and B, if
A^c ⊆ B, then A ∪ B = U."
Given: All sets are subsets of a universal set U. For all sets A and B, if
A^c ⊆ B, then A ∪ B = U.
To prove:
A ∪ B = U.
Proof:
Let x ∈ U. Since all sets are subsets of U,
x ∈ A ∪ A^c.
We will have two cases to consider:
Case 1: x ∈ A.
In this case, x ∈ A ∪ B and we are done.
Case 2: x ∉ A.
In this case, x ∈ A^c and by our assumption, A^c ⊆ B.
Thus, x ∈ B.
Hence, x ∈ A ∪ B. So, U ⊆ A ∪ B.
Now, let y ∈ A ∪ B.
Then either y ∈ A or y ∈ B.
If y ∈ A, then y ∈ U since A ⊆ U.
If y ∈ B, then y ∈ U since B ⊆ U.
Thus, we have shown that A ∪ B ⊆ U.
Therefore, A ∪ B = U.
Hence Proved. This is the required statement. Hence, we can say that "For all sets A and B, if A^c ⊆ B, then A ∪ B = U."
To know more about sets visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30705181
#SPJ11
A machine that fills cereal boxes is supposed to be calibrated so that the mean fill weight is 12 oz. Let μ denote the true mean fill weight. Assume that in a test of the hypotheses H0 : μ = 12 versus H1 : μ ≠ 12, the P-value is 0.4
a) Should H0 be rejected on the basis of this test? Explain. Check all that are true.
No
Yes
P = 0.4 is not small.
Both the null and the alternate hypotheses are plausible.
The null hypothesis is plausible and the alternate hypothesis is false.
P = 0.4 is small.
b) Can you conclude that the machine is calibrated to provide a mean fill weight of 12 oz? Explain. Check all that are true.
Yes. We can conclude that the null hypothesis is true.
No. We cannot conclude that the null hypothesis is true.
The alternate hypothesis is plausible.
The alternate hypothesis is false.
Since the P-value is 0.4 which is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis should not be rejected. Thus, the correct answer is No.
The P-value is not small enough to reject the null hypothesis, and both the null and alternate hypotheses are plausible. Therefore, P = 0.4 is not small.b) We cannot conclude that the null hypothesis is true. Since the P-value is not small enough, we cannot conclude that the machine is calibrated to provide a mean fill weight of 12 oz. So, the correct answer is No. Moreover, the alternate hypothesis is plausible, which means that there might be a possibility that the machine is not calibrated properly. Thus, the alternate hypothesis is also true to a certain extent. Hence, both the null hypothesis and the alternate hypothesis are plausible.
to know more about hypothesis visit:
https://brainly.in/question/6984941
#SPJ11
a) In this test of the hypotheses H0 : μ = 12 versus H1 : μ ≠ 12, the P-value is 0.4.
So, should H0 be rejected on the basis of this test?NoThe reason is that P = 0.4 is not small.
If the P-value were smaller, it would be more surprising to see the observed sample result if H0 were true.
But since the P-value is not small, the observed result does not provide convincing evidence against H0.
So, we cannot reject H0.
b) Can you conclude that the machine is calibrated to provide a mean fill weight of 12 oz? No. We cannot conclude that the null hypothesis is true.
The null hypothesis is plausible and the alternate hypothesis is false.
However, the fact that we cannot reject H0 does not mean that we can conclude H0 is true.
There are different reasons why the null hypothesis might be plausible even if the sample data do not provide convincing evidence against it.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that the machine is calibrated to provide a mean fill weight of 12 oz.
To know more about the word plausible visits :
https://brainly.com/question/17852352
#SPJ11
Suppose we are conducting a x² goodness-of-fit test for a nominal variable with 4 categories. The test statistic x² = 6.432 and a = .05. The critical value is [Select] so we [ Select] ✓the null hy
Suppose that you are conducting an x² goodness-of-fit test for a nominal variable with four categories. The test statistic x² is equal to 6.432, and a is equal to .05. The question asks us to fill in the blanks, and we are given the following:Critical value for a = .05 and three degrees of freedom is 7.815.
We will accept the null hypothesis if the test statistic is less than or equal to the critical value. We will reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is greater than the critical value. Because the test statistic x² of 6.432 is less than the critical value of 7.815, we can accept the null hypothesis. That is, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the observed frequencies match the expected frequencies for the four categories.
We will reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is greater than the critical value. Because the test statistic x² of 6.432 is less than the critical value of 7.815, we can accept the null hypothesis. That is, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the observed frequencies match the expected frequencies for the four categories.
To know more about statistic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31538429
#SPJ11
Given the function f(x) = x² – 3x² Find the intervals of increase and decrease. Find maxima and minima. Find the intervals of concavity up and down. Find turning points. Make a sketch of the graph, indicating the main elements.
The function f(x) = x² - 3x² can be analyzed to determine its intervals of increase and decrease, maxima and minima, intervals of concavity, and turning points. A sketch of the graph can be made to visually represent these elements.
To find the intervals of increase and decrease, we need to examine the derivative of the function f(x). Taking the derivative of f(x) = x² - 3x² gives us f'(x) = 2x - 6x = -4x. Since f'(x) is negative for x > 0 and positive for x < 0, the function is decreasing on the interval (-∞, 0) and increasing on the interval (0, ∞).To find the maxima and minima, we can set the derivative f'(x) = -4x equal to zero and solve for x. Here, we have -4x = 0, which gives us x = 0. Therefore, the function has a maximum point at x = 0.
To determine the intervals of concavity, we need to analyze the second derivative of f(x). Taking the derivative of f'(x) = -4x gives us f''(x) = -4. Since f''(x) is constant (-4), the function does not change concavity. Hence, there are no intervals of concavity up or down.The turning points of the function occur at the critical points where the concavity changes. Since the function does not change concavity, there are no turning points.
A sketch of the graph would represent a downward-opening parabola with a maximum point at (0, 0) on the y-axis. The graph would show a decreasing interval to the left of the y-axis and an increasing interval to the right of the y-axis.
Learn more about maxima and minima here
https://brainly.com/question/32055972
#SPJ11
The function f(x) = –x2 – 4x + 5 is shown on the graph.
On a coordinate plane, a parabola opens down. It goes through (negative 5, 0), has a vertex at (negative 2, 9), and goes through (1, 0).
Which statement about the function is true?
The domain of the function is all real numbers less than or equal to −2.
The domain of the function is all real numbers less than or equal to 9.
The range of the function is all real numbers less than or equal to −2.
The range of the function is all real numbers less than or equal to 9.
does anyone know the answer??
Answer: The range of the function is all real numbers less than or equal to 9.
Step-by-step explanation:
Recall that a parabola represents a quadratic function, which is a polynomial function of degree 2. Then, recall that the domain of any polynomial function must comprise of all real numbers. Hence, the domain of the quadratic function represented by the parabola is all real numbers. So, the first and second statements are false.
Since the parabola opens down, then its vertex (-2,9) is a maximum point. This indicates that the y-coordinate of the uppermost point on the parabola is y=9.
So, the y-coordinates of all points on the parabola must be at most 9, or equivalently are less than or equal to 9. Therefore, the range of the function (i.e. set of y-coordinates of all points on the parabola) is all real numbers less than or equal to 9. This indicates that the third statement is false, while the last statement is true.
Create a maths problem and model solution corresponding to the following question: "Find the inverse Laplace Transform for the following function" Provide a function that produces an inverse Laplace Transform that contains the sine function, and requires the use of Shifting Theorem 2 to solve. The expression input into the sine function should contain the value 3t, and use a value for c of phi/4.
Consider the function F(s) = (s - ϕ)/(s² - 6s + 9), where ϕ is the constant value ϕ/4. To find the inverse Laplace Transform of F(s), we can apply the Shifting Theorem 2.
Using the Shifting Theorem 2, the inverse Laplace Transform of F(s) is given by:
f(t) = e^(c(t - ϕ)) * F(c)
Substituting the given values into the formula, we have:
f(t) = e^(ϕ/4 * (t - ϕ)) * F(ϕ/4)
Now, let's calculate F(ϕ/4):
F(ϕ/4) = (ϕ/4 - ϕ)/(ϕ/4 - 6(ϕ/4) + 9)
= -3ϕ/(ϕ - 6ϕ + 36)
= -3ϕ/(35ϕ - 36)
Therefore, the inverse Laplace Transform of the given function F(s) is:
f(t) = e^(ϕ/4 * (t - ϕ)) * (-3ϕ/(35ϕ - 36))
The solution f(t) will involve the sine function due to the exponential term e^(ϕ/4 * (t - ϕ)), which contains the value 3t, and the expression (-3ϕ/(35ϕ - 36)) multiplied by it.
To learn more about Laplace - brainly.com/question/30759963
#SPJ11
1. Evaluate the following antiderivatives, i.e., indefinite integrals. Show each step of your solutions clearly. (a) √(x+15)¹/4 z dr. 1 (b) - (10.2¹ – 2/3 + sin(2x) 1(2x)) da (c) cos(2/2 cos(2√x) dr.
To evaluate the given antiderivatives, we will apply the power rule, constant multiple rule, and trigonometric integration formulas. In each case, we will show the step-by-step solution to find the indefinite integrals.
(a) To find the antiderivative of √(x+15)^(1/4) with respect to x, we can apply the power rule of integration. By adding 1 to the exponent and dividing by the new exponent, we get (4/5)(x+15)^(5/4) + C, where C is the constant of integration.
(b) The antiderivative of -(10.2 - 2/3 + sin(2x))(1/(2x)) with respect to x can be found by distributing the 1/(2x) term and integrating each term separately. The antiderivative of 10.2/(2x) is 5.1 ln|2x|, the antiderivative of -2/(3(2x)) is -(1/3) ln|2x|, and the antiderivative of sin(2x)/(2x) requires the use of a special function called the sine integral, denoted as Si(2x). So the final antiderivative is 5.1 ln|2x| - (1/3) ln|2x| + Si(2x) + C.
(c) The antiderivative of cos(2/2 cos(2√x)) with respect to x involves the use of trigonometric integration. By applying the appropriate trigonometric identity and using a substitution, the antiderivative simplifies to ∫ cos(2√x) dx = ∫ cos(u) (1/(2u)) du = (1/2) sin(u) + C = (1/2) sin(2√x) + C, where u = 2√x.
In all cases, C represents the constant of integration, which can be added to the final answer.
To learn more about antiderivatives click here :
brainly.com/question/30764807
#SPJ11
1) Luis invests $1000 into an account that accumulates interest continuously with a force of interest 8(t) = 0.3 +0.1t, where t measures the time in years, for 10 years. Celia invests $1000, also for 10 years, into a savings account that earns t interest under a nominal annual interest rate of 12% compounded monthly. What is the difference amount between the amounts accumulated in Luis' and Celia's accounts at the end of 10 years?
The difference amount between the amounts accumulated in Luis' and Celia's accounts at the end of 10 years is $2733.68. Luis invested $1000 into an account that accumulates interest continuously with a force of interest 8(t) = 0.3 +0.
1t for 10 years. Celia invested $1000 for 10 years into a savings account that earns t interest under a nominal annual interest rate of 12% compounded monthly. Using the formula of force of interest we get: $8(t)= \int_{0}^{t} r(u) du = \int_{0}^{t} 0.3 +0.1u du $$\Right arrow 8(t)= 0.3t + \frac{0.1}{2}t^{2} $Also, Nominal annual interest = 12% compounded monthly= 1% compounded monthly Using the formula of compound interest,
we get: $A = P(1+\frac{r}{n})^{nt} $$\Right arrow A = 1000(1+\frac{0.01}{12})^{10*12} $$\Right arrow A = 1000(1.0075)^{120} $= 3221.62Therefore, the amount accumulated in Celia's account at the end of 10 years = $3221.62Also, $A(t) = P e^{\int_{0}^{t}r(u)du} $$\Right arrow A(t) = 1000e^{\int_{0}^{t}(0.3+0.1u)du} $$\Right arrow A(t) = 1000e^{0.3t+0.05t^{2}} $Now, we calculate the amount that Luis will have in his account after 10 years by putting t = 10 in the above equation.$$A(10) = 1000e^{0.3*10+0.05*10^{2}} $$\Right arrow A(10) = 5955.30
Therefore, the amount accumulated in Luis' account at the end of 10 years = $5955.30The difference amount between the amounts accumulated in Luis' and Celia's accounts at the end of 10 years is: Difference = $5955.30 - $3221.62= $2733.68Therefore, the difference amount between the amounts accumulated in Luis' and Celia's accounts at the end of 10 years is $2733.68.
To know more about force of interest refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32630156#
#SPJ11
The Poisson distribution describes the probability ... 1. ... that the mean is equal to the variance. 2. ... that a certain number of discrete events will occur given some specific conditions. 3. ... that data has not been falsified. 4. All of the above
Option 2. that a certain number of discrete events will occur given some specific conditions.
The Poisson distribution describes the probability that a certain number of discrete events will occur given some specific conditions.
The Poisson distribution is a discrete probability distribution that expresses the probability of a given number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space if these events occur independently and at a constant rate.
The distribution of events is called Poisson distribution when the following conditions are met;events are discrete, occurring independently, and at a constant average rate.
The Poisson distribution may be used to predict how many times an event may occur over a period of time or in a given area.
The mean of a Poisson distribution is equal to its variance.
To know more about Poisson distribution visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30388228
#SPJ11
Find the intervals on which f(x) is increasing, the intervals on which f(x) is decreasing, and the local extrema. f(x) = x³ + 7x +4
Find f(x)
F(x)= x^3 +7x+4
f'(x) =
The function f(x) = x³ + 7x + 4 is increasing on its entire domain.
There are no local extrema.
How to find the local extremaTo find the intervals on which the function f(x) = x³ + 7x + 4 is increasing or decreasing, we need to analyze the sign of its derivative.
the derivative of f(x):
f'(x) = 3x² + 7
set the derivative equal to zero and solve for x to find any critical points:
3x² + 7 = 0
The equation does not have any real solutions, so there are no critical points.
analyze the sign of the derivative in different intervals:
For f'(x) = 3x² + 7, we can observe that the coefficient of the x² term (3) is positive, indicating that the parabola opens upwards. Therefore, f'(x) is positive for all real values of x.
Since f'(x) is always positive, the function f(x) is increasing on its entire domain.
Regarding local extrema, since the function is continuously increasing, it does not have any local extrema.
Learn more about local extrema at
https://brainly.com/question/29298072
#SPJ4
The sequence a₁ = (3^n +5^n)^1/n a) conv. to 0 b) conv. to 5 c) conv. to 1 d) div. e) NOTA
The sequence a₁ = (3^n + 5^n)^(1/n) converges to 5. The limit of the sequence as n approaches infinity is 5. This means that as n becomes larger and larger, the terms of the sequence get arbitrarily close to 5.
Let's examine the expression (3^n + 5^n)^(1/n). As n gets larger, the dominant term in the numerator is 5^n, since it grows faster than 3^n. Dividing both the numerator and denominator by 5^n, we get ((3/5)^n + 1)^(1/n). As n approaches infinity, (3/5)^n approaches 0, and 1^(1/n) is equal to 1.
Therefore, the expression simplifies to (0 + 1)^(1/n), which is equal to 1. Multiplying this by 5, we obtain the limit of the sequence as 5.
In conclusion, the sequence a₁ = (3^n + 5^n)^(1/n) converges to 5 as n approaches infinity.
Learn more about expression here:
https://brainly.com/question/28170201
#SPJ11
Mrs Rodriguez , a highschool school teacher in Arizona, claims that the average scores on a Algebra Challenge for 10th grade boys is not significantly different than that of 10th grade girls. The mean score for 24 randomly sampled girls is 80.3 with a standard deviation of 4.2, and the mean score of 19 randomly sampled boys is 84.5 with a standard deviation of 3.9. At alpha equal 0.1, can you reject the Mrs. Rodriguez' claim? Assume the population are normally distributed and variances are equal. (Please show all steps) .
a. Set up the Hypotheses and indicate the claim
b. Decision rule
c. Calculation
d. Decision and why?
e. Interpretation
a. Set up the Hypotheses and indicate the claim:
Null hypothesis (H0): The average scores on the Algebra Challenge for 10th grade boys [tex]($\mu_b$)[/tex] is the same as that of 10th grade girls [tex]($\mu_g$)[/tex].
Alternative hypothesis (H1): The average scores on the Algebra Challenge for 10th grade boys [tex]($\mu_b$)[/tex] is significantly different than that of 10th grade girls [tex]($\mu_g$).[/tex]
Claim by Mrs. Rodriguez: The average scores on the Algebra Challenge for 10th grade boys is not significantly different than that of 10th grade girls.
b. Decision rule:
The decision rule can be set up by determining the critical value based on the significance level [tex]($\alpha$)[/tex] and the degrees of freedom.
Since we are comparing the means of two independent samples and assuming equal variances, we can use the two-sample t-test. The degrees of freedom for this test can be calculated using the following formula:
[tex]\[\text{df} = \frac{{(\frac{{s_g^2}}{{n_g}} + \frac{{s_b^2}}{{n_b}})^2}}{{\frac{{(\frac{{s_g^2}}{{n_g}})^2}}{{n_g-1}} + \frac{{(\frac{{s_b^2}}{{n_b}})^2}}{{n_b-1}}}}\][/tex]
where:
- [tex]$s_g$ and $s_b$[/tex] are the standard deviations of the girls and boys, respectively.
- [tex]$n_g$ and $n_b$[/tex] are the sample sizes of the girls and boys, respectively.
Once we have the degrees of freedom, we can find the critical value (t-critical) using the t-distribution table or a statistical calculator for the given significance level [tex]($\alpha$).[/tex]
c. Calculation:
Given data:
[tex]$n_g = 24$[/tex]
[tex]$\bar{x}_g = 80.3$[/tex]
[tex]$s_g = 4.2$[/tex]
[tex]$n_b = 19$[/tex]
[tex]$\bar{x}_b = 84.5$[/tex]
[tex]$s_b = 3.9$[/tex]
We need to calculate the degrees of freedom (df) using the formula mentioned earlier:
[tex]\[\text{df} = \frac{{(\frac{{s_g^2}}{{n_g}} + \frac{{s_b^2}}{{n_b}})^2}}{{\frac{{(\frac{{s_g^2}}{{n_g}})^2}}{{n_g-1}} + \frac{{(\frac{{s_b^2}}{{n_b}})^2}}{{n_b-1}}}}\][/tex]
[tex]\[\text{df} = \frac{{(\frac{{4.2^2}}{{24}} + \frac{{3.9^2}}{{19}})^2}}{{\frac{{(\frac{{4.2^2}}{{24}})^2}}{{24-1}} + \frac{{(\frac{{3.9^2}}{{19}})^2}}{{19-1}}}}\][/tex]
After calculating the above expression, we find that df ≈ 39.484.
Next, we need to find the critical value (t-critical) for the given significance level [tex]($\alpha = 0.1$)[/tex] and degrees of freedom (df). Using a t-distribution table or a statistical calculator, we find that the t-critical value is approximately ±1.684.
d. Decision and why?
To make a decision, we compare the calculated t-value with the t-critical value.
The t-value can be calculated using the following formula:
[tex]\[t = \frac{{\bar{x}_g - \bar{x}_b}}{{\sqrt{\frac{{s_g^2}}{{n_g}} + \frac{{s_b^2}}{{n_b}}}}}\][/tex]
Substituting the given values:
[tex]\[t = \frac{{80.3 - 84.5}}{{\sqrt{\frac{{4.2^2}}{{24}} + \frac{{3.9^2}}{{19}}}}}\][/tex]
After calculating the above expression, we find that t ≈ -2.713.
Since the calculated t-value (-2.713) is outside the range defined by the t-critical values (-1.684, 1.684), we reject the null hypothesis (H0).
e. Interpretation:
Based on the results of the statistical test, we reject Mrs. Rodriguez's claim that the average scores on the Algebra Challenge for 10th grade boys is not significantly different than that of 10th grade girls. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that there is a significant difference between the mean scores of boys and girls on the Algebra Challenge.
To know more about hypothesis visit-
brainly.com/question/19670902
#SPJ11
