The correct answer is A)
How do we know that a new star has also appeared in Israel? (Matthew
2:1-2.)
2:1-2 Magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem after Jesus was born in Bethlehem, Judea, during Herod the king's reign, asking, "Since we recognized His star in the east, we came to adore Him.
What was the Star in Matthew 2?The nativity story of the Gospel of Matthew's chapter 2 has the Star of Bethlehem, often known as the Christmas Star, where "wise men from the East" (Magi) are motivated to journey to Jerusalem by the star.
Halley's Comet was the "broom star" that the Chinese claimed to have seen in the sky in 12 BC. Giotto da Bondone painted one of the most iconic representations of the Star of Bethlehem as a flaming comet hanging over the stable in 1301 after witnessing Halley's Comet for the first time.
Thus, 2:1-2 Magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem after Jesus was born in Bethlehem.
For more information about Star in Matthew 2, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28247274
#SPJ1
What happened to the African American soldiers who were caught up in the Brownsville Affair? Select the best answer from the choices provided. A. They were all discharged from the military based on criminal charges that had little evidence. B. Their officers were promoted and reassigned to California. C. They were shipped to Cuba to fight the Spanish and then later sent to the Philippines. D. They were honored for their capture of Pancho Villa in Mexico.
Answer:
The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
The Brownsville Affair falsely accused African American soldiers. They were given dishonorable discharge.
The Brownsville Affair happened in 1906. One white man was shot and killed and another shot and wounded. Even though white commanders said the soldiers had all been in their barracks, the African American soldiers were still dishonorably discharged.
It wasn't until after most of them were dead that they were given honorable discharged and provided a little compensation.
Thus, the best answer here is A.
Answers B, C, and D are not true.
please help!! i have a debate in my class anti federalists vs federalists. i’m supposed to debunk one of their arguments and it is “americans won’t be able to vote for their president and will have no voting rights”, what fact can i use to argue that as a federalist?
Answer:
As a federalist, you can argue that the U.S. Constitution specifically states that the president is elected by the Electoral College, not by popular vote. Therefore, Americans still have voting rights, as they are able to vote for their representatives in the Electoral College. This ensures that all citizens have a say in the election of the president, regardless of their state's population.
Explanation:
im writing an essay on ADVENT. please give me your opinions
Answer: Maybe write about the advent of something that is important to you, or something that has affected you on a personal level.
How did public high schools play a role in preparing students for the future?
Answer:*Began offering a broad range of
courses such as vocational training for
those interested in industrial jobs
*Widespread education increased
literacy in America
Explanation:
URGENT
What did you learn while analyzing the treatment of Japanese Americans during World War II? Write a few sentences to explain what you learned, what surprised you, and what challenged you.
It is important to defend overall rights of other individuals and it is incorrect to stereotype entire groups when studying how Japanese Americans were treated throughout World War II.
Why would the US join World War II?The argument about American involvement between the Pacific & European theatre of World War II was put to rest by the Japanese bombing on Pearl Harbor upon December 7, 1941. Congress proclaimed war on Japanese Troops the following day.
Why did World War II matter so much?Undoubtedly, the most important and significant event of the 20th century was World War II. The destruction is virtually beyond calculation; the number of military and civilian fatalities is estimated to be between 70 and 85 million, or around 3% of the world's population at the time.
To know more about World War II visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7745710
#SPJ1
Answer:
It is important to defend overall rights of other individuals and it is incorrect to stereotype entire groups when studying how Japanese Americans were treated throughout World War II.The argument about American involvement between the Pacific & European theatre of World War II was put to rest by the Japanese bombing on Pearl Harbor upon December 7, 1941. Congress proclaimed war on Japanese Troops the following day.Undoubtedly, the most important and significant event of the 20th century was World War II. The destruction is virtually beyond calculation; the number of military and civilian fatalities is estimated to be between 70 and 85 million, or around 3% of the world's population at the time.
Explanation:
Which of the following allowed pastoral communities to greatly expand their range? (1 point)
a. the horse
b. iron smelting
c. the compass
d. paper money
The horse is the reason the pastoral communities could greatly expand their range. Option A
What is meant by a pastoral community?A pastoral community is a group of people who primarily raise and tend to herds of domesticated animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, and camels, for their livelihood.
They typically rely on the movement of their herds to find new grazing lands and water sources, and may also engage in some limited farming or hunting.
Pastoral communities have existed in many different regions throughout history, including on the grasslands and semi-arid regions of Africa, Asia, and Europe.
Read more on pastoral communities here: https://brainly.com/question/2035457
#SPJ1
Who did Americans blame for the labor strikes that occurred post-war?
German Americans
African Americans
Democrats
Socialists
Answer:
When people look back to the postwar era in the United States, they commonly envision an era of prosperity and social conformity. To an extent this is true -- economic growth was steady between 1945 and 1970, and by outward appearances a certain social cohesion was evident. But such a clear line of progress is easier to impose in retrospect than it was to see at the time. For in the wake of World War II, many people feared a return of the Depression, and the huge strikes, inflation, and labor disorder of 1945-46 did little to assuage those fears.
This era saw a huge influx of workers into the labor force. Over 10 million soldiers were discharged from the military between 1945 and 1947. At the same time, many millions of union members had worked in war industries during World War II. Their unions had put off any major demands for the sake of national unity. Once Japan surrendered, these demands resurfaced and led to the largest series of labor actions in American history. Over five million workers were involved in a strike during the first year after World War II.
The first big strike occurred among the oil workers, less than a month after Japan's surrender. Hours remained at their elevated wartime levels, without pay increases, and 43,000 workers went on strike. In October, Harry Truman ordered the Navy to seize many of the refineries and for the workers to return. This episode was just a footnote compared to what followed. In November the United Auto Workers struck against General Motors for 113 days. Walter Reuther led 320,000 workers and won a 17.5% pay increase.
By 1946, strikes proliferated to the point that a national crisis was at hand. Electrical workers, meatpackers, lumbermen, teamsters, and steelworkers all had their labor actions. Rochester and Pittsburgh saw general strikes take hold. In December 1946, Oakland, California would witness a general strike in which over 100,000 stopped working.
The most infamous incidents, however, occurred in early 1946. First, Harry Truman faced off with the United Mine Workers (UMW), and shortly thereafter with the nation's railroad workers. The UMW was led by John L. Lewis, a man who'd worked in the mines as a teenager and dedicated his life to the mineworkers thereafter. In March 1946 he led 350,000 of them into a coal strike. Shortly thereafter, the two largest railroad unions also struck. While Truman generally supported labor, he also feared an end to the postwar recovery and a crippling of European aid and his political prospects. He ordered the federal government to seize the affected coal mines until a settlement was reached, and threatened to draft striking rail workers into the U.S. Army.
Many of the strikes, however, did lead to some concessions. Numerous unions won wage increases, and real wages throughout the U.S. generally rose in the years after World War II. So too did prices. The official inflation rate was 8% in 1946, 14% in 1947, and 8% again in 1948. This was a stressful development for those who, for whatever reason, did not see their incomes increase accordingly.
The strikes did not win support from the majority of Americans. In the 1946 Congressional Elections, the Republican Party gained 55 seats and control of the House for the first time since 1930. Conservative sentiment in the U.S. was galvanized by opposition to the strikes while liberals were divided by the actions of Truman. Many people on the left were furious about Truman's interventions. In 1948 this sentiment drove support to Henry Wallace of the Progressive Party.
The Republicans used their majority to pass the Taft-Hartley Act over Truman's veto. This law prohibited many kinds of strikes and allowed states to pass right-to-work laws. It prohibited closed shops (i.e., where new workers must be in a given union to be hired). It required union leaders to declare to the U.S. Department of Labor that they were not communists. Truman redeemed himself with much of the labor movement by opposing the bill, but was unsuccessful in getting it repealed.
The more stable economic environment of the 1950s has become associated with the postwar memory, but people living through the first years after World War II would hardly of thought their era was a time of political consensus and friendly cooperation. In many ways, it seems this is an impression that has been imposed with the benefit of hindsight.
Explanation:
How did the traditional Chinese festival Mid-Autumn Festival come about? What special significance does it have?
Answer:
The Mid-Autumn Festival originated from the worship of celestial phenomena and evolved from the Autumn Eve to worship the moon in ancient times. Since ancient times, the Mid-Autumn Festival has had folk customs such as worshiping the moon, admiring the moon, eating moon cakes, watching lanterns, admiring osmanthus flowers, and drinking osmanthus wine. The Mid-Autumn Festival originated in ancient times, was popularized in the Han Dynasty, and was finalized in the Tang Dynasty. The Mid-Autumn Festival is a synthesis of autumn seasonal customs, and most of the festival elements contained in it have ancient origins.
Explanation:
How did the Byzantine emperor deal with the hoards of crusading knights that appeared at his door?
Answer:
haseebatifdon
hshahajsjsjsjs
why seperation from britain will lead to greater economic and personal liberty through a free market economy
The reason why separation from Britain might lead to greater economic and personal liberty through a free market economy is because the country can make its own economic decisions.
How can separation from Britain help colonies ?Separation from Britain may lead to greater economic and personal liberty through a free market economy because it would allow a country to make its own economic decisions and policies without being constrained by the regulations and laws set by another country.
A free market economy is characterized by minimal government intervention, allowing for more competition and innovation, leading to potentially greater economic growth.
Additionally, breaking free from the constraints of a centralized government may also lead to greater personal liberty as individuals and businesses are able to make their own choices and decisions. This can lead to a more dynamic and diverse economy, where people can pursue their own interests and goals.
Find out more on separation from Britain at https://brainly.com/question/639443
#SPJ1
Source 1
“More than in any other era, politics in the [late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries] was revolutionary politics. It did not defend ‘age-old rights’ but, looking ahead to the future, elevated particular interests such as those of a class or a class coalition into the interests of a nation or even of humanity as a whole. . . . New political orders came into being, with new bases of legitimacy. Any return to the world as it had been previously was barred; nowhere were prerevolutionary conditions restored. . . .
Whereas previous violent overthrows had merely led to external modifications of the status quo, the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens. These two revolutions . . ., however different from each other in their aims, signaled the onset of political modernity. From then on, defenders of the existing order bore the mark of the old and obsolete.”
Jürgen Osterhammel, German historian, The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century, 2014
Source 2
“The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive. . . . The revolutions of the Americas began by drawing on ideas of [liberty and citizenship] . . . to redefine sovereignty and power within imperial polities but ended up producing new states that shared world space with reconfigured empires. The secession of states from the British, French, and Spanish empires did not produce nations of equivalent citizens any more than it produced a world of equivalent nations. . . . Popular sovereignty was far from the accepted norm in western Europe and within empires’ spaces overseas it was unclear whether the idea of [individual rights] would be a contagious proposition or one [restricted to] a select few. . . . The nation had become an imaginable possibility in world politics. But the leaders of [empires] did not want to limit their political compass to national boundaries.”
Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, historians, Empires in World History, 2010
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
Answer all parts of the question that follows.
a) Identify ONE factor that contributed to laissez-faire economic policies becoming more popular in the period 1750–1900.
b) Describe ONE difference between mercantilist and laissez-faire economic policies.
c) Explain ONE way in which the adoption of laissez-faire economic policies led to an increase in the share of global manufacturing for states in Europe and North America.
Please help this is dueeee
Laissez-Faire had an impact on economics during the Industrial Revolution because many people thought it would accelerate economic development and enrich everyone, including industrialists and their employees.
How did laissez-faire policies aid economic growth in the late 1800s?Laissez-faire government policies encouraged the growth of American businesses since they did not place restrictions on them that would have impeded their output and profitability.
Free markets in trade (i.e., no price controls or intrusive government intervention); and a government that plays the role of the "night watchman," i.e., one that makes sure that contracts are upheld, conflicts are resolved peacefully, everybody's rights are upheld, and civilization is protected from scofflaws both domestically and abroad throughout its police and courts.
How is laissez-faire policy different from mercantilism?The laissez-faire philosophy holds that the free market should control commercial activities. To achieve a favorable trade balance under capitalism, government economic control is required.
Contrary to mercantilist policies, which were designed to benefit the government and the commercial class, the laissez-faire, or free markets, theories that Adam Smith popularized interpreted economic health in a much broader sense, encompassing the entire population.
How did laissez-faire improve the economy?Businesses in a free-market economy have more flexibility from governmental prohibitions that would make doing business more difficult. In such a setting, businesses are more inclined to take chances and invest in the economy.
The widespread adoption of 14 or 16-hour workdays, the absence of safety regulations, and poor wages were all caused by these types of policies. Businesses profited from the absence of government regulation of labor markets, which led to a rise in total production.
The introduction of laissez-faire principles benefited North America and Europe since there was a significant increase in demand and supplies as a result of a free market.
The free market is among the market types that are most suited for any region because there is little price disparity and the demand for the commodity becomes fully elastic.
Learn more about laissez-faire principles: https://brainly.com/question/16279411
#SPJ1
6. Many would refer to capitalism as the great equalizer, stating people at the bottom need capitalism in order to succeed. Explain why this is so as opposed to other forms of economic systems?
Answer:
The answer is much more complicated then whether or not "capitalism" is the great equalizer or not. Capitalism, does not, in fact, directly act as the great equalizer. An equalizer, in the most direct sense of definition, implies the usage of "equalizing", or putting all sides on level playing field. Capitalism does not directly exemplify the given definition, rather, it is exemplified in the ideal. If you were to go into depth of what is the greatest direct equalizer of the common folk, it would instead be that of a Communist ideal. Communism acts as a tangible equalizer in the restriction of both personal choices, as well as availability of choice, whether within one's lifestyle, in the products one can own and procure, as well as with one's ideal. Instead, Capitalism acts as the great equalizer in presenting what is seemingly equal opportunities. In this definition, it provides each individual equality, or the option to obtain the same resources and opportunities. For example, they may take part in public education, have the option to take part in societal-sanctioned activities that can procure them wealth, such as the stock market. However, it is important to note that while there may seem to be equal opportunities to all people, it may take different amounts of leverage from different people depending on their life. It is not the same for all people, and individuals would still have individual experiences on what "equality" can be. This is also known as Equity, where each individual has different circumstances, and must be able to make use of what they have to reach a comparable outcome to others.
Now, Capitalism is different to other forms of economic system, because it actually provides such opportunities. In comparison, Communism provides equal opportunity for little to no choices, while older systems such as the class system provides opportunity based on what class one was assigned too. As such, capitalism is as close to being a equalizer as compared to other systems, while allowing people to build a more financially stable life.
Why is a country better off not isolating itself from all other countries
Answer:
There are several reasons why a country is better off not isolating itself from all other countries:
Economic Interdependence: Countries benefit from trade and investment with other nations. Isolation would limit access to goods, services, and markets, and could negatively impact the country's economy.
Cultural Exchange: Interacting with other cultures can lead to increased understanding and appreciation, which can foster peace and stability.
Political Influence: Countries that engage with other nations have more influence on the global stage and can work together to address global challenges such as climate change and terrorism.
Technological Advancement: Countries that are isolated from the rest of the world may miss out on the latest technological developments and advancements.
Shared Global Challenges: Countries that isolate themselves may miss out on opportunities to collaborate on issues such as public health, security and environment.
In conclusion, isolation can lead to negative economic, social, political and technological consequences for a country, and it is important for nations to maintain relationships with other countries in order to thrive in the global community.
what are the characteristics of authoritarianism? of totalitarianism? of despotism?
Answer:
Authoritarianism, totalitarianism, and despotism are all forms of government that have certain characteristics in common, but they are also distinct in some ways.
Characteristics of authoritarianism:
Limited political freedom and civil liberties
Strong centralized power and control over the government and society
A single leader or small group of leaders hold significant power
Limited or no participation in political decision-making
Repression of political opposition and control of the media
Characteristics of totalitarianism:
Total control over all aspects of society, including the economy, education, and culture
A single leader or small group of leaders hold absolute power
Limited or no political freedoms and civil liberties
Use of propaganda and control of the media to shape public opinion
Repression of political opposition and use of secret police to maintain control
A strong sense of nationalism and a cult of personality around the leader
Characteristics of despotism:
Absolute power is held by a single ruler
Limited or no political freedoms and civil liberties
No or limited participation in political decision-making
Repression of political opposition and control of the media
No or limited accountability for the ruler's actions
No or limited rule of law and arbitrary decision-making
It's worth noting that these forms of government can overlap and share characteristics with each other, but there are still clear distinctions between them.
The spinning wheel was developed in Great Britain about 1750. Most economists agree this marked the beginning of
Answer:
the industrial revolution in Britain. The invention of the spinning wheel allowed for the mass production of yarn and
textiles, which increased the productivity of the cotton industry and helped to create a new economic system in Britain.
This new system was based around the use of machines and factories to produce goods, as opposed to the traditional
methods of craftsmanship and small-scale production. This led to the creation of new job opportunities, the growth
of cities, and the rise of a new class of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs. The spinning wheel also helped to reduce
the cost of production, allowing more people to purchase higher quality textiles at a lower price. This increased
consumption, which in turn helped to stimulate economic growth and development.
How did the US government raise money to finance the war?
By holding scrap drives
By rationing scarce goods
By selling war bonds
Answer:
By selling war bonds
Explanation:
The US government raised money to finance the war by using taxes as well as war bonds.
Answer:
D) By selling war bonds
Explanation:
During times of war, governments often resort to issuing bonds to raise money to finance the war effort. War bonds are a type of debt security, similar to regular bonds, but they are issued by the government and are intended to be held by citizens to help fund the war. The government promises to pay back the bond, with interest, at a later date. War bonds were sold to citizens during World War I and World War II as a way for the US Government to raise money for the war effort. People could buy war bonds with cash, and the government would use the money to finance the war. These bonds were marketed as a patriotic duty and a way for citizens to support the war effort, and were sold to people of all income levels.
Lantern Festival, one of the traditional Chinese festivals, also known as Shangyuan Festival, Little First Moon, Yuanxi or Lantern Festival, takes place on the fifteenth day of the first lunar month every year.
The first month is the first month of the lunar calendar, and the ancients called "night" as "xiao". According to Taoism "Sanyuan", the fifteenth day of the first lunar month is also called "Shangyuan Festival". Since ancient times, the Lantern Festival has been dominated by warm and festive lantern viewing customs.
The Lantern Festival is a traditional festival of Chinese culture, and according to the information provided, we can understand more about such customs, motivations and the history of the festival.
What is a cultural tradition?It corresponds to manifestations historically preserved by the culture of a people, that is, the set of habits, values and customs that are instituted in a place and passed on to future generations through the process of socialization, being an important part of the cultural and social identity of a group.
As well as the Lantern festival, which takes place every year in China on the 15th day of the first Chinese lunar month and aims to wish good things and light up the world, all over the world there are many traditional and cultural festivals, such as the Diwali in India, Carnival in Brazil and Day of the Dead in Mexico.
Therefore, the cultural festivals of each country are an integral and representative part of their values and histories, capable of bringing pride and perpetuating customs to the population.
Find out more about cultural festivals on:
https://brainly.com/question/15683032
#SPJ1
Which diagram correctly matches the military leader with his actions during the early years of the Civil War?
The diagram that correctly matches the military leader with his actions during the early years of the Civil War is B George McClellan Led the failed union invasion of Virginia.
There were numerous reasons why Union General George McClellan failed to capture Virginia during the American Civil War. One of the primary reasons was his wary and slow way to deal with the mission. McClellan was well-known for his meticulous planning and focus on the small things, which frequently led to delays and missed opportunities.
His lack of cooperation with other Union generals was another factor in his failure to capture Virginia. McClellan was known for being difficult to work with as a leader, and he frequently ignored the guidance and instructions of his superiors, including President Abraham Lincoln.
To learn more about George McClellan at
https://brainly.com/question/10547394
#SPJ1
Answer: It's A
Explanation: Just took the question
Can your name two commercial products that donate to nonprofit organization ?
The Microsoft and Amazon are the two commercial products that donate to nonprofit organization.
What is non-profit organization?The non- profit organizations are those organizations that has main motive of social welfare rather than the profit making. For example- giving education to poor people, constructing hospitals.
The commercial organizations which are running businesses for profit motive donate some part of their profit as a charity to these non-profit organizations.
The main source of revenue for these organizations so that the can do social work is the big commercial businesses.
Learn more about non- profit organizations here:
https://brainly.com/question/29795918
#SPJ1
Why was
Czechoslovakia able to maintain a political
democracy when its neighbors did not?
The reason why Czechoslovakia was able to maintain a political democracy when its neighbors did not was that they had a history of democracy.
Why was Czechoslovakia's democracy maintained ?Czechoslovakia was able to maintain a political democracy for several reasons. One reason is that it had a well-established democratic tradition, dating back to the First Czechoslovak Republic in the 1920s and 1930s. Additionally, Czechoslovakia had a strong civil society and a relatively high level of economic development, which helped to support and strengthen democratic institutions.
Furthermore, Czechoslovakia was not occupied by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, which allowed for a greater degree of autonomy and freedom than in other Eastern European countries. Finally, Czechoslovakia had a history of political stability and a relatively peaceful transition to democracy in 1989.
Find out more on Czechoslovakia at https://brainly.com/question/9626976
#SPJ1
why americans choose herbert hoover for president
Hoover was a candidate for the Republican Party in the 1928 presidential election in the United States. He defeated Democratic contender Alfred E. Smith (1873–1944), the governor of New York.
What did Herbert Hoover accomplish for the USA?Hoover was named the head of the Food Administration by President Woodrow Wilson when the United States joined the conflict in 1917. As the "food czar" of his nation, he rose to fame. Following the war, Hoover oversaw the American Relief Administration, which fed the millions of people who were hungry in Central and Eastern Europe, particularly Russia. Hoover was chosen to lead the U.S. Food Administration in 1917, after the United States had joined the conflict. The endeavour to conserve resources and supplies and to feed America's European allies was led by Hoover since he was the best person for the job. Hoover gained notoriety; the term "to Hooverize" denoted food cost savings.
To know more about president visit:
brainly.com/question/29630246
#SPJ1
What role did female reformers play in the Progressive era and why were there so many female activists compared to previous reform attempts in the US?
Answer:
Women became leaders in a range of social and political movements from 1890 through 1920. This period is known as the Progressive Era. Progressive reformers wanted to end political corruption, improve the lives of individuals, and increase government intervention to protect citizens.
Poland in the 17th century was located primarily north of the Central Russian Upland. Based on the map above, what challenge did it face in the age of empires?
A. It lacked natural barriers at its borders.
B. It would have needed to import grain for food.
C.It lacked navigable rivers to move goods.
D. Heat and humidity would have made viral diseases a chronic issue.
Answer:
Letter (A) - It lacked natural barriers at its borders.
Explanation:
Based on the map above, the challenge that Poland in the 17th century faced in the age of empires was that it lacked natural barriers at its borders. This meant that the nation was more vulnerable to invasion and conquest by its neighbors, as it lacked physical barriers to protect its borders. Additionally, due to its location, Poland would have lacked navigable rivers to move goods and resources, which would have posed a further challenge in terms of its ability to trade with its neighbors.
Poland in the 17th century was located primarily north of the Central Russian Upland. It lacked natural barriers at its borders which was a challenge did it face in the age of empires. The correct option is A.
What is Poland's main resource?The natural resources in Poland are comparatively abundant. Despite the fact that brown coal is also mined, bituminous coal is the main mineral asset. The large Upper Silesian coalfield provides the majority of the bituminous output.
During the 17th century, Poland-Lithuania was a major power in Eastern Europe, but it faced many challenges in the age of empires. One of the primary challenges was its vulnerable geographical location. Poland-Lithuania was located on a vast plain that lacked natural barriers, making it vulnerable to invasion by neighboring powers.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about Poland here:
https://brainly.com/question/10585031
#SPJ2
What was the encomienda system?
The way provincial governors in South America were rotated in the Spanish Empire
The Incan system of subjugating conquered peoples
The military tactic used by the Spanish to push the final Islamic stronghold out of Grenada
The forced labor Spanish settlers were granted by the king in return for "protecting" the Native Americans
Answer:
Explanation:
The Encomienda system was a colonial labor system established by the Spanish Empire in the early 16th century, in which a Spanish settler was granted the right to work the land of a Native American in return for protecting them and providing religious instruction. Under this system, the Native American community was obligated to provide the settler with labor, tribute, and goods. The encomienda system was used to control and exploit the native population, and it often led to the abuse and mistreatment of the Native Americans. The system was abolished in the late 18th century as part of Spanish efforts to reform its colonial policy.
Use the chart below to answer the question that follows:
Europe and Africa to Americas Americas and Europe to Africa
Plants coffee, sugar cane, bananas, melons, olives, barley, wheat, oats, rice, ragweed, bluegrass, dandelions, daisies, clover maize (corn), potatoes, sweet potatoes, peanuts, squash, pumpkins, tomatoes, peppers, papaya, guava, avocado, pineapple, manioc, cacao, chicle, tobacco
Animals cattle, chickens, horses, goats, sheep, pigs llamas, alpacas, turkeys, guinea pigs
Humans African slaves, European merchants, officials, priests, and settlers few
Diseases smallpox, yellow fever, malaria, measles, chicken pox, influenza, common cold syphilis
The chart above supports the idea that
Europeans brought livestock to support a permanent move to the Americas
Native Americans successfully colonized the Old World
the population of the New World was much higher than that of European countries
pre-Columbian civilizations had not successfully domesticated any animals for food
Answer:
The chart above supports the idea that Europeans brought livestock such as cattle, chickens, horses, goats, sheep, and pigs to the Americas, while the Americas sent plants such as maize, potatoes, sweet potatoes, peanuts, and various fruits, as well as animals like llamas, alpacas, turkeys, and guinea pigs to Europe. It also suggests that the transatlantic slave trade brought many African slaves to the Americas, and European merchants, officials, priests, and settlers also made the journey. Additionally, it shows that diseases such as smallpox, yellow fever, malaria, measles, chicken pox, influenza, and the common cold were introduced to the Americas by Europeans, while syphilis was brought from the Americas to Europe.
Answer: Europeans brought livestock to support a permanent move to the Americas.
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right
Identify a technology that allowed ships to sail in the wind. (1 point)
a. square rigging
b. magnetic compass
c. lateen sail
d. astrolabe
C. Lateen sail
The lateen sail creates a difference in air pressure between the concave and convex of the sail (which are the two sides of the sail.) The fore-and-aft sail works the same way. The lateen sail is also effective in lighter winds.
Both square rigging and lateen sail are technologies that allowed ships to sail in the wind. Square rigging captures wind from behind, beneficial for long ocean voyages, whereas lateen sail allows sailing against the wind.
Explanation:The technology that allowed ships to sail in the wind is represented by options a. square rigging and c. lateen sail. These forms of sail technology significantly increased the maneuverability and speed of ships. The square rigging was a type of sail design where the sails were set square to the ship's mast, allowing vessels to effectively capture the wind from behind, which is ideal for long ocean voyages.
On the other hand, the lateen sail is a triangular sail set on a long yard mounted at an angle on the mast. This design allowed ships to sail against the wind, a critical breakthrough in navigation technology.
Learn more about Sail Technology here:https://brainly.com/question/33723739
#SPJ2
How did the purpose of many concentration camps change after 1941?
They went from housing Jews and Roma to housing political prisoners.
They became slave labor camps to produce goods for Germany.
They went from labor camps to extermination camps.
They became a holding point for newly captured Russian soldiers.
Answer:
Explanation:
After 1941, the purpose of many concentration camps changed significantly. The camps had previously been used to house Jews and Roma, but with the outbreak of World War II, the camps began to be used to house political prisoners, including German opponents of the Nazi regime. These prisoners were largely treated worse than Jews and Roma, as they were seen as a greater threat to the regime.
With the war in full swing, the camps became places of slave labor, with prisoners forced to work in factories producing goods for the German military. The conditions in these labor camps often included malnutrition, exhaustion, and other forms of mistreatment.
In 1942, the purpose of many concentration camps changed yet again with the implementation of the Final Solution. Jews and other minority groups were now sent to extermination camps, where they were systematically killed in gas chambers. This was done in an attempt to rid the German Reich of all “undesirables”.
Finally, in late 1943 and early 1944, the purpose of many concentration camps changed yet again. The camps were now used as a holding point for newly captured Russian soldiers. These prisoners were subjected to harsh conditions and often used as forced labor in German factories.
4.
What expressed power of
Congress allows lawmakers to
adjust the minimum wage or
protect workers from harm?
Answer:
The expressed power of Congress to adjust the minimum wage or protect workers from harm is found in the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. This clause grants Congress the power "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." This power has been interpreted to include the authority to set minimum wage and labor standards, as well as to regulate working conditions.
Explanation:
Compare and contrast the historical views on gender in greece, egypt, rome and china?
Rome's culture did not view women as having the same legal standing as males as it did in ancient Egypt. They were under a man's rule and only received a basic education if any at all. This was traditionally their father before marriage.
Egyptian women were equal to Egyptian males, unlike the majority of other ancient societies. People's distinctions in legal and economic rights were caused by social class, not by variations in gender. A king's or important official's wife, mother, or daughter may exercise significant influence.
Compared to male citizens, women in the ancient Greek civilization had few rights. A woman's place was in the house and her role in life was to raise children because she was unable to vote, possess land, or inherit. Greek women had essentially no political rights of any kind and were subject to male authority almost their whole lives.
In china, Women were primarily limited to domestic labor such as weaving because they had no legal rights to the property other than those related to their dowries. The widespread practice of foot binding, which prohibited women from standing or walking, made this easier.
to learn more about gender equality:
brainly.com/question/24803290
