Penrose and Katz claimed that the social nature of science indicates that scientists depend on prior research in their fields and the work of their colleagues in other fields of study to progress and develop, scientists are inclined to have different assumptions and beliefs in their own areas of research.
A, B, and C are the social implications of science according to Penrose and Katz. D, scientists agreeing on their assumptions and beliefs within their fields of study, is incorrect. What is the social nature of science? Social science is defined as the social context in which scientists conduct their private lives. The social nature of science is the idea that science is a social endeavour and that scientific development is influenced by social factors such as interactions between scientists and other agents in the scientific environment. Penrose and Katz argued that the social implications of science imply that scientists depend on prior research in their fields and the work of their colleagues in other fields of study to progress and develop. Scientists also have different assumptions and beliefs in their areas of research, and these beliefs and assumptions can differ. This, however, does not imply that scientists agree on their beliefs and assumptions in their fields of research. What is Penrose’s theory? Penrose is a British physicist and mathematician. She is most recognised for her contributions to the field of cosmology, where she has studied topics such as black hole thermodynamics and gravitational wave detection. Penrose’s research has been recognized with numerous accolades, including the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2020.
For more information on cosmology visit:
brainly.com/question/902959
#SPJ11
