D. All of the above
According to Texas Minimum Standards for Child Care, caregivers are not allowed to admit a child for care if the illness prevents the child from participating comfortably in child care center activities, if the illness results in a greater need for care than the caregivers can provide without compromising the care of other children or if the child has an oral temperature of above 101 degrees and accompanied by behavior changes or other signs and symptoms of illness. All of these conditions are reasons that a child should not be admitted for care according to the Texas Minimum Standards.
Which of the following allowed pastoral communities to greatly expand their range? (1 point)
a. the horse
b. iron smelting
c. the compass
d. paper money
a. The horse allowed pastoral communities to greatly expand their range.
The domestication of the horse allowed pastoral communities to greatly expand their range.
The horse is a fast and efficient mode of transportation, allowing pastoralists to move their herds over long distances in search of new pastures and water. This allowed them to take advantage of a wider range of resources, and expand their territory beyond what would have been possible on foot. This ability to move and expand territory led to the development of pastoral nomadism, which allowed pastoralists to support larger communities and populations.
Learn more about pastoral communities,
https://brainly.in/question/13057269
As you read about the Constitution, decide whether each of these
Many of the statements you've provided are true, but some are not. Below is a breakdown of the accuracy of each statement:
True: Larger states have more senators than smaller states. This is a reference to the principle of equal representation in the Senate, as outlined in the Constitution.False: The House of Representatives can bring charges of misbehavior against officials in other branches of government, including the president. This is incorrect. It is the House of Representatives that can bring articles of impeachment against the President, Vice President, and other civil officers of the United States.True: A bill may be introduced in either the House or the Senate, but it must be approved by a majority vote in both houses. This is a key step in the legislative process, known as the bicameral system.True: If the president vetoes a bill, it cannot become law. The President has the power to veto a bill, which means they can reject it.True: Bills for raising money (such as taxes) must begin in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose changes to the bill. This is known as the Origination Clause.True: The elastic clause gives Congress the power to do what is "necessary and proper" to carry out its other powers, leaving room for changes in the future. This clause is also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause.False: The government can take away a citizen's right to a fair trial. The Constitution guarantees citizens the right to a fair trial and due process under the law.False: States can make treaties or declare war. Only the federal government has the power to make treaties and declare war, as outlined in the Constitution.True: In the Electoral College system, the candidate who gets the most votes in a state generally gets all the electoral votes of that state.True: The Constitution specifies what should happen if a president dies or is removed from office. This is done through the process of Presidential succession.False: Either the president or Congress can declare war. The Constitution grants the power to declare war to Congress, not the President.True: The Senate appoints ambassadors, justices of the Supreme Court, and cabinet members.True: The "State of the Union address" includes the president's plans and policies for the year. This is a speech given annually by the President to a joint session of Congress.True: The Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, but leaves the rest of the federal courts to be set up by Congress.True: States have their own court systems that deal with state laws.False: If a person is charged with a crime and flees to a different state, he or she doesn't have to face criminal charges. The US Constitution has an Extradition Clause which allows states to request the return of a person charged with a crime in another state.True: Citizens have the same rights and privileges of citizenship no matter which state they live in.False: New states can be formed within any existing state without that state's approval. The Constitution provides a specific process for the admission of new states into the Union, which requires the approval of both Congress and the existing state(s).True: It takes fewer votes to ratify, or officially approve, an amendment to the Constitution than it does to propose an amendment. This is because the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to propose an amendment, but only a three-fourths vote of the states to ratify an amendment.False: If a state law is in conflict with a national law, the national law may be ignored. NationalFalse. If a state law is in conflict with a national law, the national law takes precedence under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.True. The Bill of Rights guarantees individuals' freedom of religion, speech, and assembly.False. Citizens cannot be punished for expressing their opinions about the government, as long as they do not incite violence or engage in other illegal activities.True. False.True, under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, citizens have the right to refuse to incriminate themselves.What is the constitution?The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. It was written in 1787 and has since been amended 27 times. It outlines the national frame of government, specifying the powers and duties of the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Therefore, the Constitution has a central place in American law and political culture. The signing of the Constitution took place on September 17, 1787, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and is now celebrated as Constitution Day and Citizenship Day in the United States.
Learn more about Constitution from
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
Which of the following may the president do to limit the Supreme Court's power?
O Adopt new constitutional amendments
O Veto parts of the Court's decisions
O Fire and replace justices
O Refuse to enforce a ruling by the Court
The thing that the president can do to limit the Supreme Court's power is Fire and replace justices.
What can be done by the President to curtail the Supreme Court's authority?Another method presidents can affect court decisions is by filling open positions on the bench. The power of the Supreme Court is also checked via judicial nominations and confirmations.
The Executive branch can appoint Federal judges and grant pardons, which gives it control over the Judicial branch's decisions.
"By selecting the justices, both the Congress and the president constrain the supreme court's independence.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about president at:
https://brainly.com/question/2409724
#SPJ1
Part D
Analyze the mood and tone of "Winter Dreams."
The mood and tone of "Winter Dreams" would be disappointed, because Dexter Green does not able to find happiness.
What was the mood and tone of "Winter Dreams"?The mood and tone of this story describe Dexter having to pay a higher price for success, as well as his ability to be happy being limited by social mobility.
Judy's personality is shown to be distressing, regardless of her wealth. Judy's hazy hope describes how money or power do not increase satisfaction.
The character of Dexter Greene, who always considered the luxurious cloths while achieving their financial goals, exemplifies the theme of disillusionment in this story.
Learn more about "Winter Dreams", refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13457313
#SPJ1
Identify, explain and classify the different kinds of property
Corporeal property and incorporeal property are the two primary forms of property. In contrast to the incorporeal property, which cannot be seen or touched, the corporeal property is both.
What is Property?Property is something over which a person or company has legal authority.
The various types of property include Movable Property. Property that is mobile can be transferred from one location to another without getting damaged. Any property that cannot be transferred from one location to another is considered immovable. Tangible Property, Intangible Property, Public Property, Private Property, Personal Property, Real Property, and others.
Therefore, Basically, the property is of two categories: Corporeal Property and Incorporeal Property.
Learn more about Property, here;
https://brainly.com/question/29528698
#SPJ1
Why did the U.S. enter world war 2? How did the war end?
Answer:
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor caused World War 2.
After the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan surrendered.
For Kant, moral law dictates us to:
A) Act in a way to maximize the total happiness of the community
B) Follow the example of our elected officials
C) Act only on maxims that we can become universal laws
D) Sacrifice ourselves for the well-being of others
For Kant, moral law dictates us to: C) Act only on maxims that we can become universal laws.
What is moral law?Moral law can be defined as the law that states how people should live rightly and should not be partial when dealing with people.
This moral law help to know the act that are right and those that are wrong or immoral which is why kent states in his theory that lack of honesty, stealing are immoral act while honesty, truthful are moral act.
Therefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about moral law here:https://brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast the facts of the Battles of Lexington and Concord with the short personal account of the battles by Anne Hulton. Why is having both general facts and personal accounts important to understanding history?
Nearly 130 colonial militiamen and Regulars were killed on April 19, 1775. The fighting along the “Battle Road” grew bloody as the Regulars marched from Concord towards Lexington and back to Boston. This is the view of the Battles of Lexington and Concord.
What are the Battles of Lexington and Concord?The American Revolutionary War's opening battles were the Battles of Lexington as well as Concord. The conflicts took place on April 19, 1775, in the towns of Lexington, Concord, Lincoln, Menotomy (present-day Arlington), and Cambridge, all located in Middlesex County, Province of Massachusetts Bay.
The American War of Independence began on April 19, 1775, with the Battles of Lexington and Concord, which included the infamous "shot heard round the world" (1775-83). It influenced many Americans to take up arms as well as support the cause of independence, which was politically disastrous for the British.
Learn more about the Battles of Lexington and Concord here:
https://brainly.com/question/12278946
#SPJ1
How was the United States impacted after world war II
Answer:
george washingston
Explanation:
ah
Why do you think there were 3 different outcomes for the American Revolution, French Revolution, and Haitian Revolution, even though they all began with similar intentions?
Answer:There were different armies
Explanation:
If they all had the same army, then the otcomes of the fifferent situations most likely would have been more similar.
The French Revolution was a rebellion against an existing internal power structure, leading to class conflict and stress within France. The American Revolution was a rebellion against an external force, resulting in a sense of unification in America.
What was French Revolution?The French Revolution, also known as the Revolution of 1789, was a revolutionary movement that shook France between 1787 and 1799 and reached its first peak there in 1789.
For this reason, the term "Revolution of 1789" has become widely used to refer to the end of the ancient regime in France as well as to distinguish it from the later French revolutions of 1830 and 1848.
The French Revolution had both specific causes explaining why it was by far the most violent and the most globally significant of these revolutions, as well as generic causes that were shared by other Western revolutions at the end of the 18th century.
The Western world's social structure was the first of the general causes. In certain parts of Europe, the feudal system had already crumbled and been replaced.
Learn more about French Revolution, here
https://brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ1
Describe FOUR ways in which the political organization of the Taino was different from the political organization of the Kalinago.
Answer:
1. The Taino had a hierarchical political structure with a paramount chief at the top, while the Kalinago had a more egalitarian system of governance with no single chief.
2. The Taino had a centralized political system with a single leader who had authority over the entire population, while the Kalinago had a decentralized system with multiple leaders who shared power.
3. The Taino had a more formalized system of governance, with laws and regulations, while the Kalinago had a less formal system with fewer laws and regulations.
4. The Taino had a more militaristic approach to politics, with a standing army and a system of fortifications, while the Kalinago had a more peaceful approach to politics, with no standing army or fortifications.
Explanation:
please help with this
Answer:
the turtle was swim and fish also and then the bird was decide on how to fly and provide the other three
President Ronald Reagan met with which
Soviet Union leader to discuss nuclear arms
reduction during the 1980's?
A. Fidel Castro
B. Leonid Brezhnev
C. Mikhail Gorbachev
Both Presidents Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev seriously addressed the prospect of getting rid of all of their respective countries' nuclear weapons as well as all of their ballistic missiles
Gorbachev's fall of the USSR?On December 25, Gorbachev announced his resignation and gave Yeltsin, the new president of the Russian Federation, authority of his executive branch, including the nuclear launch codes. The Russian tricolor flag was raised in the Kremlin that evening when the Soviet flag was down.
How was the Soviet Union altered under Gorbachev?The most important change made by Gorbachev in the international economic sector was to enable foreigners to participate in the Soviet Union through joint ventures with state-owned companies, cooperatives, and ministries.
To know more about Mikhail Gorbachev visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3681790
#SPJ1
Kant argues that ___________________ is the basis of morality.
A) fairness
B) kindness
C) piety
D) freedom
Kant argues that the, basis of morality is the concept of freedom. There can be no other foundation for morality than reason. The correct option is (D).
What do you mean by the basis of morality?Morality is the application of ethical principles to issues that are more significant than etiquette. Such violations might affect one's conscience, result in social repercussions, and alter interpersonal connections.
Moral laws must be supported by axiomatic notions like the notions of duty and law. Humanity's actions may demonstrate that men adhere to these moral standards, yet they are insufficient to support their actions.
Therefore, Kant argues that the, basis of morality is the concept of freedom. There can be no other foundation for morality than reason
To know more about the basis of morality, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24623551
#SPJ1
4.2.4 Practice: The Boxer Rebellion
U.S. History since the Civil War Honors
Points Possible: 30
Apex Learning - Practice Assignment
Reasons in favor of U.S. involvement in the
Boxer Rebellion:
Your Assignment
1. In a T-chart, list reasons for United States intervention in the Boxer Rebellion.
Reasons against U.S. Involvement in the Boxer
Rebellion:
Reasons for United States intervention in the Boxer Rebellion.
American citizens were assaulted by boxers. The security of American citizens was under threat.Reasons against U.S. Involvement in the Boxer Rebellion
Americans who weren't the targets of an attack might have been pointed out due to American Intervention in teh movement.It can lead to Prospective violation of the rights of US citizens whose rights had not been abused.What is Boxer Rebellion?Chinese independence was clearly marked during the Boxer Rebellion. Due to the hatred displayed by the Boxers, who assaulted foreigners and US citizens alike, US involvement in the case is significant for the safety of its people.
In the given case, it already abuses US citizens so involvement of the US might cretes a risk for the remaining ones and they might get attacked by the Boxers in China.
Learn more about Boxer Rebellion, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12983877
#SPJ1
A Founding Father,
became a leader in
Boston politics through his writing. He was delegate to the First and Second
Continental congresses and helped draft the Declaration of Rights.
Answer:
This description fits John Adams, who was a prominent figure in the American Revolution and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. He was a delegate to the First and Second Continental Congresses, and he played a key role in drafting the Declaration of Rights. Additionally, he served as the second President of the United States.
12. Extended Response: Describe five
facts about the United Nations
that you learned from reading
this book.
Five permanent members: China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States five facts about the United Nations .
Why is it vital to educate yourself about the UN?
The United Nations defends human rights, provides humanitarian help, encourages sustainable development, and respects international law in addition to preserving world peace and security.
What exactly is a UN short note?
On October 24, 1945, nations came together to form the United Nations (UN), an organization whose goal is to foster global cooperation.
After World War II, it was established to take the role of the League of Nations and stop further conflicts. The UN had 51 members when it was first established, but there are now 193 members.
Learn more about the United Nations
brainly.com/question/9763405
#SPJ1
Explain the impact that newspapers had on westward expansion.
Please
Newspapers shaped 19th-century American public opinion and drove westward growth. They supplied information about new areas, pioneer experiences, and available land for colonization.
What is the impact that newspapers had on westward expansion.?Generally, Newspapers played a significant role in shaping public opinion and driving westward expansion in the United States during the 19th century. They provided information about new territories, reported on the experiences of pioneers, and advertised available land for settlement.
Additionally, newspapers often promoted the idea of manifest destiny and urged citizens to settle on the western frontier.
This helped to create a sense of national expansion and unity, and contributed to a sense of purpose and progress among Americans.
They were also a tool to push the government to take actions to expand the nation, by urging the government to purchase or annex new territories and to build infrastructure like railroads to connect the eastern and western parts of the country.
Overall, newspapers played a key role in shaping the narrative of westward expansion, and helped to fuel the expansionist sentiment that was a major driving force in American history during the 19th century.
Read more about westward expansion
https://brainly.com/question/29774506
#SPJ1
PLEASE
Introduction
In this activity, you will discuss the philosophies that led to this design for the US federal government. You will also discuss about how the Framers of the Constitution convinced their fellow citizens that this was the best way to avoid tyranny.
__________________________________________________________________________
Directions and Analysis
Task: Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances
Perform online research and read Federalist papers 10 and Federalist 51. Select passages from Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 that explain the reasons checks and balances are necessary. Explain the benefit of separation of powers as a way to address the reasons for checks and balances.
Type your response here:
Answer:
In Federalist 10, James Madison argued that the US Constitution should be organized in such a way as to prevent the rise of any one faction or group from gaining too much power. He argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances between the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) would be the best way to ensure that no one group or faction could gain too much control. This would prevent any one group from gaining too much power and becoming tyrannical.
The benefit of separation of powers is that it allows each branch of government to act as a check on the power of the other branches. This ensures that no one branch can gain too much power and become tyrannical. Furthermore, it ensures that the government is more accountable to the people, as each branch of government is held accountable to the other branches. This allows for a more balanced government that is more responsive to the people.
Explanation:
In at least one paragraph discuss the concept of triangular trade and how this relates to the Atlantic Slave Trade. Be sure to discuss in detail each leg of the journey.
Explanation:
Triangular trade refers to the historical trade pattern that existed between Europe, Africa, and the Americas during the colonial period. The trade route was called triangular because it involved a three-legged journey, with ships sailing from Europe to Africa, then to the Americas, and finally back to Europe. Each leg of the journey had a specific trade commodity.
The first leg of the journey, from Europe to Africa, involved the trade of manufactured goods such as textiles, guns, and rum. European traders would exchange these goods for enslaved Africans who were captured by African traders. The second leg of the journey, from Africa to the Americas, involved the transport of enslaved Africans to the American colonies where they were sold as labor for the growing plantation economy. This was the most brutal part of the journey and many enslaved Africans died due to the harsh conditions on the ships.
The final leg of the journey, from the Americas back to Europe, involved the trade of raw materials such as sugar, tobacco, and cotton. These goods were produced by the enslaved Africans on the plantations and were then sold to European traders for profit. The triangular trade route was a major contributor to the growth of the Atlantic slave trade, which forcibly brought millions of enslaved Africans to the Americas. This trade had a profound impact on the economies of Europe, Africa, and the Americas and its legacy can still be felt today
what aspects of our society in terms of technology have change in the past 50 years
In the past 50 years, technology has had a significant impact on our society in various ways. Some of the most notable changes include:
The Internet and the rise of digital technology: The Internet has revolutionized the way we communicate, access information, and conduct business. It has also led to the growth of e-commerce and the rise of digital technology, such as smartphones, laptops, and tablets.
Advancements in medical technology: Medical technology has advanced significantly in the past 50 years, with new treatments and technologies being developed to improve healthcare and extend human life.
Automation and robotics: Automation and robotics have become more prevalent in various industries, such as manufacturing, agriculture, and transportation. This has led to increased efficiency and productivity, but also to concerns about job displacement.
Social media and digital communication: Social media platforms and messaging apps have changed the way we communicate with each other and consume information. They have also had an impact on how we form and maintain relationships, share news and opinions and how we consume information.
Artificial intelligence: The development of AI has led to the creation of intelligent machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making.
Climate change and renewable energy: Climate change and the need for sustainable energy sources have led to the growth of renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal power.
Overall, technology has had a significant impact on our society in the past 50 years, shaping the way we live, work, and communicate with each other. It has brought many benefits, but also raised concerns about job displacement and digital divide among others.
Socialists in Oklahoma supported radically different ideas from Socialists elsewhere in the US. All of the following were “Sooner Socialist” ideas except __________.
A.
viewing farmers as part of the working classes
B.
rejecting organized religious doctrine
C.
arguing that socialism was more moral than capitalism
D.
believing that farmers were an important part of the socialist movement
Socialists in Oklahoma supported radically different ideas from Socialists elsewhere in the US. the options were “Sooner Socialist” ideas except B.rejecting organized religious doctrine.
What are the ideas of Socialists in Oklahoma?The early socialists, who were primarily despondent agrarian farmers who were well-known in Oklahoma in the early 19th century, did not make a concerted attempt to combat religion.
By 1920, organized socialism in Oklahoma had all but disappeared. In 1928, the Oklahoma State Socialist Party was revived, and throughout the Great Depression's first half of the 1930s, it had some modest growth.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about Oklahoma at:
https://brainly.com/question/10165461
#SPJ1
Write a note on the religion of the ancient greeks
Answer:
Ancient Greek theology was polytheistic based on the assumption that there were many gods and goddesses as well as a range of lesser super natural being as of various types.
Which of the following best explains Lodge's point of view on markets in the excerpt?
(A) Many Americans believed that acquiring island territories would encourage economic development.
(B) Republican business leaders lobbied for imperial expansion to provide locations for new factories.
Political leaders claimed that the lives of Native Americans could be improved if they moved to new
overseas colonies.
(C)
(D)
Democrats argued that the United States should focus on domestic economic development over international
trade.
Many Americans, it appears from the material in the question, thought that purchasing island territory would promote economic progress.
What do they call island?An island is a landmass surrounded by water. Despite being completely encircled by water, continents are not considered islands because of their size.
On earth, how so many islands are there?To the best of anyone's knowledge, the earth has about 670,000 islands in total if we add up all the islands that are owned by the world's nations, as well as those that are owned by Antarctic and other unclaimed regions. Those who have the most islands are: Sweden (239,057) Norway (221,831)
To know more about island visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13762672
#SPJ1
Classify the given ideas based on whether they are supported or opposed by Islamic fundamentalists.
A puritanical, revivalist, and reform movement among Muslims that seeks to get back to Islam's founding texts is known as Islamic fundamentalism.
What is Islamic fundamentalists ?According to Islamic extremists, Muslim-majority nations should revert to the principles of an Islamic state that properly embodies Islam's sociopolitical and economic framework.
Islamic fundamentalists favour a literal and originalist interpretation of Islam's three main texts (the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunnah); [2] they strive to purge their lives of all corrupting non-Islamic influences; and [3] they view the term "Islamic fundamentalism" as a derogatory term used by outsiders to refer to Islamic activism and revivalism.
Learn more more about Islamic fundamentalists here
https://brainly.com/question/4452250
#SPJ1
where was Jesus born
Answer: Bethlehem
Explanation:
Answer:
he was born in bethlehem on decemder 24
Explanation:
Read these excerpts from speeches given by Nikita Khrushchev, Fidel Castro, and John F. Kennedy during the Cold War. Use the information from the three passages to write a historical essay that responds to the historian's claim. Be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a thesis, body paragraphs with at least three pieces of evidence supporting your thesis, a counterclaim to your thesis, and a refutation of that counterclaim. Finally, include a conclusion paragraph restating your thesis and the evidence supporting it.
Passage 1: Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev addressed the UN Assembly in 1960 after U.S. military aircraft allegedly entered Soviet airspace.
We saw a dangerous manifestation of the work of these forces last spring when the aircraft of one of the largest States Members of the United Nations, the United States of America, treacherously invaded the air space of the Soviet Union and that of other States. What is more, the United States has elevated such violations of international law into a principle of deliberate State policy. The aggressive intrusion into our country by a United States aircraft and the whole course of the United States Government's subsequent behaviour showed the peoples that they were dealing with a calculated policy on the part of the United States Government, which was trying to substitute brigandage for international law and treachery for honest negotiations between sovereign and equal States.3
Passage 2: Cuban prime minister Fidel Castro made a speech in 1961 after the United States sponsored the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, a Soviet ally. Our position is that We Will lan, but we do not want direct aggression. We do not wish to suffer the destruction that aggression would bring. If the aggression comes, it will meet the total resistance of our people.
They are the ones who are bringing the world to the brink of war through their warlike spirit, their own contradictions, and their economic problems which cause them to provoke a series of crises in order to maintain their war economy. Their factories run only when they are building war material. Their regime is marching toward a crisis. It is not like our economy, which is perfectly planned.4
Passage 3: U.S. president John F. Kennedy addressed the United States after it was discovered that the Soviet Union had placed nuclear weapons in Cuba, just 70 miles from the U.S. border.
I want to take this opportunity to report on the conclusions which this Government has reached on the basis of yesterday's aerial photographs which will be made available tomorrow, as well as other indications, namely, that the Soviet missile bases in Cuba are being dismantled, their missiles and related equipment are being crated, and the fixed installations at these sites are being destroyed.
The United States intends to follow closely the completion of this work through a variety of means, including aerial surveillance, until such time as an equally satisfactory international means of verification is effected.5
i’ll mark brainliest i need this essay as soon as possible
During the Cold War, a period of rising tension and hostilities between the United States and the Soviet Union, three prominent leaders—Nikita Khrushchev, Fidel Castro, and President John F. Kennedy—gave speeches outlining their respective nations' stances and responses to the conflicts taking place. In his speeches, Khrushchev accused the United States of “treacherous” acts and menacing policy, Castro warned of the inevitability of war given the U.S.'s “warlike spirit,” and Kennedy acknowledged but discredited the Soviet Union's missile buildup in Cuba. Taken together, these speeches demonstrate that both the U.S. and the Soviet Union maintained a prevailing sentiment of hostility and distrust during the Cold War.
Khrushchev's speech at the United Nations Assembly in 1960 is among the earliest expressions of U.S.-Soviet cold war tensions. In it, he directly accuses the United States government of initiating conflict and violating international law by entering Soviet airspace with military aircraft. Likewise, Castro's speech following the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion was just as critical of U.S. policy, placing the blame squarely on the warlike spirit of the United States' “regime,” which he claims could only maintain its economy through provoking international crises. Both Khrushchev and Castro's speeches reflect the mutual distrust and hostility between the two countries during the Cold War.
On the other hand, Kennedy's speech in 1962 is perhaps the most noteworthy in terms of rhetoric. In it, the president acknowledges the Soviet Union's missile buildup in Cuba, but refutes it by claiming the United States would continue to monitor the dismantlement of the missiles and their related equipment until an “international means of verification” could be established. President Kennedy's speech here not only serves as an indication of the rising hostilities between the two nations, but it also communicates a sense of trust and cooperation, given his assurance that the U.S. would be kept informed and updated on the situation.
The three speeches taken together paint a picture of the atmosphere between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Khrushchev and Castro's speeches captured the mutual distrust, hatred, and aggression between the two countries, while Kennedy's speech notes both an awareness of the conflict and a willingness to work toward a coherent and peaceful resolution. Clearly, these excerpts demonstrate that hostilities between the United States and the Soviet Union were prevalent during the Cold War, but there is also an underlying sense of cooperation, which is evident in Kennedy's “international means of verification” speech. Ultimately, these speeches suggest that while the Cold War was marked by distrust and aggression between the two nations, there was also an underlying desire to cooperate and resolve the issues that divided them.
What is one difference between a four-year college and a vocational school ?
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679): People are naturally selfish and evil; without a strong civilizing government to restrain humanity's violent impulses, the "state of nature" is a "war of all against all" and life is "nasty, brutish, and short."
John Locke (1632–1704): People are born blank slates, neither good nor bad. For that reason, each generation must take great care what environment they raise the next generation in, because everything they think will be based on what they are taught by people and circumstances.
John-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778): People are born naturally good and civilization corrupts them. If people could just ignore the confusing influence of social conventions and follow their natural instincts the world would be much better.
For this assignment, you will need to follow the essay format as made famous by Michel de Montaigne. He is credited with creating the essay, which literally comes from the French word for "trial," as in a weighing of evidence—so you can blame Montaigne for the essay.
Step 1
Start by evaluating the three positions outlined above, one at a time. For each, consider evidence that supports it and evidence that raises a problem for it. This is your personal reflection, so you can do research but for your evidence you may also just use your personal observations: have you seen yourself and others demonstrate natural goodness, badness, or neutrality?
Step 2
Having considered each, identify which of the three positions makes the most sense to you and explain why. This should be based on more than what you would like it to be. What makes one position's evidence stronger to you than the others? You need to explain this.
Step 3
For your final paragraph, you need to address a specific problem with the position you picked in step 2, as follows:
If you chose humans are naturally bad, how can any government be trusted if it consists of humans?
If you chose humans are naturally neutral, does that mean no one is ultimately responsible for their actions because they are just a product of their environment—what about historical figures who stood up to their societies and said something was wrong?
If you chose humans are naturally good, why are laws of any kind necessary?
Your assignment here is to write out your thoughts on the question of human nature, not provide the final answer. So think deeply about these ideas, but don't stress if you're not satisfied with your response in the final step—there is a reason people have been debating these issues for a few centuries and counting!
Human nature has been a topic of debate for centuries, with various philosophers presenting different perspectives on the subject. In this essay, I will evaluate the positions presented by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and identify the one that makes the most sense to me.
Thomas Hobbes argues that people are naturally selfish and evil and that without a strong government to restrain humanity's violent impulses, the "state of nature" is a "war of all against all" and life is "nasty, brutish, and short." This position is supported by evidence of war, conflict, and violence throughout history, as well as by the fact that people often act in their own self-interest. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people are inherently bad and that there is no hope for them to improve.
John Locke argues that people are born blank slates, neither good nor bad. For that reason, each generation must take great care what environment they raise the next generation in, because everything they think will be based on what they are taught by people and circumstances. This position is supported by the fact that people's actions and beliefs can be influenced by their environment and by the fact that people are capable of change. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people have no inherent nature and that they are just a product of their environment.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues that people are born naturally good and that civilization corrupts them. If people could just ignore the confusing influence of social conventions and follow their natural instincts, the world would be much better. This position is supported by the fact that people often act in ways that are beneficial to others and by the fact that people are capable of empathy and compassion. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people are inherently good and that there is no need for laws or government to restrain them.
After considering these three positions, I believe that the position presented by John Locke makes the most sense to me. I agree that people are not inherently good or bad, but rather that they are shaped by their environment and experiences. I also believe that people have the ability to change and improve based on their surroundings and that it is important for each generation to take great care in raising the next generation.
One problem with this position is that it suggests that people have no inherent nature and that they are just a product of their environment, which could be seen as excusing people from being ultimately responsible for their actions. However, I believe that people have the ability to make choices and that they are responsible for their actions, despite the influences of their environment.
In conclusion, the debate on human nature is a complex and ongoing one. While each position has its own strengths and weaknesses, I believe that the position presented by John Locke makes the most sense to me as it acknowledges that people are shaped by their environment, but also holds that people have the ability to make choices and take responsibility for their actions.
Thomas Hobbes - Humans are naturally selfish and evil: Hobbes' view of human nature posits that without strong civilizing governance, human behavior would devolve into a chaotic and violent state of nature. Evidence supporting this position can be found in historical conflicts, power struggles, and instances of aggression among individuals and groups.
Personal observations of selfish behavior and acts of violence also contribute to this argument. However, a problem with this perspective lies in the fact that humans are capable of acts of kindness, empathy, and cooperation, which indicates a more nuanced nature.
John Locke - Humans are born blank slates: Locke's theory suggests that individuals are born without innate characteristics and are shaped by their environment and experiences. Evidence in favor of this position can be found in the vast diversity of beliefs, behaviors, and personalities across different cultures and societies. Personal observations of people transforming under various circumstances align with Locke's blank slate concept. Nevertheless, the idea that humans are entirely malleable raises questions about any inherent moral compass and the origins of universal ethical principles.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Humans are born naturally good: Rousseau's perspective contends that humans are inherently good and that society's influence corrupts their inherent virtues. Evidence for this viewpoint lies in instances of compassion, altruism, and benevolence shown by individuals in various situations. Personal observations of acts of kindness and selflessness also reinforce this notion. However, a problem arises in explaining the presence of malevolence and cruelty in human history, suggesting that an entirely positive view of human nature might overlook important aspects of reality.
Step 2: My Perspective on Human Nature Among the three positions, John Locke's view that humans are born as blank slates resonates most with me. While I acknowledge the presence of both selfish and altruistic tendencies in humans, the idea that we are shaped significantly by our experiences, education, and environment seems compelling. Personal observations and experiences have shown that individuals can transform and grow positively or negatively based on their surroundings. The richness of human diversity and the potential for change and personal growth reinforce the notion that we start with a blank slate and become shaped through our experiences.
Step 3: Addressing a Problem with the Chosen Position While I lean towards Locke's view of humans as blank slates, a specific problem with this perspective is the question of ultimate responsibility. Historical figures who stood up to their societies and challenged prevailing norms and injustices serve as examples of human agency and the ability to transcend societal influences. This raises a paradox: if humans are purely products of their environment, how do we explain acts of moral courage and defiance against societal norms? Striking a balance between acknowledging the influence of the environment and accepting individual responsibility remains a complex challenge in understanding human nature.
Conclusion: In exploring the question of human nature, it becomes evident that the topic is multifaceted and open to various interpretations. Each position - Hobbes' pessimistic view, Locke's tabula rasa theory, and Rousseau's optimistic perspective - offers valuable insights into human behavior. While I find the idea of humans as blank slates compelling, it is essential to recognize the complexities of human nature and the ongoing nature of this philosophical debate.
To learn more about environment, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/5511643
#SPJ2
From the spirit of laws by Charles Louis Montesquieu 1749
And from a vindication of the rights of woman by Mary Wollstonecraft 1792 help me start them please!!!
Answer:
Could u paste that DBQ link?
Explanation:
