increasesAnswer:
Explanation:
warring states were defeated and china unifies
During the Warring States period, various states in China engaged in conflicts and wars. Eventually, one state emerged victorious and unified China.
The Warring States period in ancient China was characterized by intense competition and warfare among multiple states vying for power and control. This period lasted from the 5th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE.
However, the Qin state, under the leadership of Qin Shi Huang, emerged triumphant and successfully unified China.Qin Shi Huang implemented a series of military, political, and administrative reforms that helped strengthen the Qin state and achieve victory over its rivals. The construction of the Great Wall, standardization of weights and measures, and centralization of power were some of the key initiatives that contributed to the unification of China.The unification of China under the Qin Dynasty marked a significant turning point in Chinese history. It laid the foundation for a centralized imperial system that would shape the subsequent dynasties. The unified China brought stability, economic growth, and cultural exchange, but it also resulted in the suppression of regional identities and the imposition of strict governance.The unification of China was a complex process that involved military conquests, political maneuvering, and socio-economic changes. It brought about a new era of imperial rule and left a lasting impact on the political, social, and cultural development of China.
For more questions on conflicts
https://brainly.com/question/32663176
#SPJ8
Complete Question:
What do you understand by ''warring states were defeated and China unifies''.
Christianity, Islam, and Judaism have which characteristic in common? A. They all emerged in the Middle East in the seventh century CE. O B. They all assert that a variety of gods control different aspects of human life. C. They all advocate the use of violence to spread their beliefs. D. They all originated from the teachings of Abraham.
D, they all originated from the teachings of Abraham
Explanation: These religions were all established in different time periods, so A is wrong. They are also all monotheistic religions, believing in one singular God, and generally do not advocate for violence. However, all three are Abrahamic religions, so D is the correct answer.
Happy to help; have a great day! :)
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
If we look at the question, Judaism only has one Almighty, which is the same with Christianity and Islam. So we see that B is not correct. If we look at A, Christianity started c. 27-30 A.D, with Judaism starting off much earlier, around 1800 B.C.E, both originating way before the seventh century. Islam is much, much younger, as it began around the year 610, C.E.
Christianity and Judaism don't advocate violence to spread their beliefs, except for the small few. This is mostly a trait of Islam. Don't read me wrong though! Some forms of Islam are quite peaceful!
According to Greek mythology, where did the gods live?
A
They spent half of their time on land and half up high in the sky.
B
They lived on top of Mount Olympus.
C
They lived in the natural phenomena they were said to explain.
D
They lived on the sun.
Answer:
b, they lived on Mount Olympus which was the highest peak in Greece
At the center of Greek mythology is the pantheon of gods and goddesses who were said to live on Mount Olympus, the highest mountain in Greece. From their lofty perch, they ruled every aspect of human life.
:D hope that helps!
Essay
Topic: What is the Law Regarding Stealing in Washington State?
500 words min
Answer:
In Washington State, theft is defined as wrongfully obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over the property or services of another, obtaining control over the property or services of another by using deception, or appropriating lost or misdelivered property or services of another with the intent of depriving them of their property or services. The term "property" includes anything of value, whether tangible or intangible, and "services" include businesses such as labor, professional, and transportation services; the hospitality industry; restaurants; entertainment; and public utility services.
Washington law classifies theft as first-, second-, or third-degree crimes. The felony threshold for theft in Washington state is $750. A person who steals property or services worth $750 or less is guilty of third-degree theft, which is a gross misdemeanor that subjects a defendant to up to 364 days in jail and a $5,000 fine. A person commits second-degree theft when the value of the stolen property or services is more than $750 but less than $5,000. Punishment for such an offense includes up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. First-degree theft involves stolen property or services worth over $5,000. Regardless of value, stealing a firearm or motor vehicle or taking property of any value directly from a person constitutes a class B felony. A defendant guilty of any of these class B felony thefts faces up to 10 years in prison and a $20,000 fine.
In conclusion, theft is a serious crime in Washington State that can result in substantial incarceration time and large fines. The penalties for theft vary depending on the value and type of property stolen and the degree of the crime.
Jobs are not always safe and companies sometimes have to fire workers due to low demand for products they produce advantage or disadvantage
Disadvantage: When companies have to fire workers due to low demand for the products they produce, it creates job insecurity and poses a disadvantage for the affected employees.
Economic conditions: A decline in product demand often reflects unfavorable economic conditions, such as a recession or market saturation.Reduced revenue: When companies experience lower demand, their revenue decreases, making it difficult to sustain existing workforce levels.Cost-cutting measures: To mitigate financial losses, companies may resort to cost-cutting measures, which often include reducing employee headcount.Job insecurity: Workers facing the risk of being fired due to low product demand experience increased job insecurity, uncertainty, and stress.Financial impact: Losing a job can have significant financial consequences for individuals and their families, including loss of income, benefits, and stability.Career disruption: Job loss can disrupt career progression and lead to difficulties in finding new employment, especially if the industry as a whole is facing similar challenges.Economic ripple effects: Job losses in one industry can have a ripple effect on the overall economy, affecting consumer spending and potentially leading to a broader economic slowdown.Overall, the firing of workers due to low product demand is a disadvantage as it negatively impacts individuals and the wider economy.
For more such question on demand
https://brainly.com/question/850547
#SPJ8
which statement best defines the phrase cradle of chineese civilization 1. the place where the longest river in china starts
2. the place where most people in ancient china lived
3. the place where people in china began a farming culture
4. the only place where people could farm
Answer:
1. Anhui and Jiangsu
2. the Tian Shan
3. China's development policy modernized agricultural production during the first 20 years of thecommune system. Over the period 1957 to 1979: Horsepower per hectare of major agricultural machinery (irrigation or drainage equipment, tractors, and tillers) grew at an annual rate of 24%
4. farms
Explanation:
mark me the brainliest
Is the source a trustworthy source to use in a research paper? Why or why not? In
your answer, make sure to clearly describe the standards you are using to evaluate it.
Why have you determined that it is or is not a trustworthy one to use?
Title: "Why Mesopotamia Was More Advanced than Ancient
Without further information about the specific source or the content it covers, it is difficult to determine its trustworthiness. However, by considering the author's credibility, publication reputation, potential bias, and accuracy of information, one can make a more informed judgment about whether the source is trustworthy and suitable for use in a research paper.
To evaluate the trustworthiness of a source, several factors need to be considered, including the author's credibility, the publication's reputation, the presence of bias or agenda, and the accuracy of the information presented.
When evaluating the trustworthiness of a source, it is important to consider the author's expertise and qualifications in the subject matter. Are they recognized experts in the field? Do they have relevant academic credentials or professional experience? This information helps establish the credibility of the author and their ability to provide accurate and reliable information.
The reputation and credibility of the publication or platform where the source is published are also crucial. Is it a well-known and respected journal, publication, or website? Are the editorial processes rigorous and peer-reviewed? Trusted sources typically adhere to high standards of accuracy, fact-checking, and quality control.
Bias or agenda is another aspect to consider. Does the source present a balanced and objective view of the topic, or does it have a particular bias or agenda? Biased sources may present skewed information or manipulate facts to support a specific viewpoint. It is important to critically analyze the source for any potential biases that may influence the information provided.
Lastly, the accuracy of the information presented should be assessed. Are the claims supported by evidence? Are there references or citations to reliable sources? Trustworthy sources strive to provide accurate information based on sound research, data, and reliable sources.
Without further information about the specific source or the content it covers, it is difficult to determine its trustworthiness. However, by considering the author's credibility, publication reputation, potential bias, and accuracy of information, one can make a more informed judgment about whether the source is trustworthy and suitable for use in a research paper.
for more questions on credibility
https://brainly.com/question/29824832
#SPJ8
are the sisters of perpetual indulgence real nuns
How did technology lead to the international expansion of Chinese culture under the Song dysnasty
Answer:
Explanation:
the invention of the compass allowed for new maritime trade routes
Estimate the difference to the nearest tenth.0.612 – 0.185
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.8
please say in comments
or not
The difference between 0.612 and 0.185 is approximately 0.4.
Which of these statements is true about learning in the late Middle Ages? OA. By trying to bring faith and reason together, Scholasticism became unpopular. OB. By trying to bring faith and reason together, Scholasticism caused people to lose faith. OC. By trying to bring faith and reason together, Scholasticism caused the end of universities. OD. By trying to bring faith and reason together, Scholasticism encouraged learning.
Scholasticism, a philosophical and educational movement prominent in the late Middle Ages, aimed to reconcile faith and reason through rigorous intellectual inquiry. So, option D is the right choice.
Scholasticism: Scholasticism was a dominant intellectual framework during the late Middle Ages, particularly in universities and educational institutions.Faith and reason: Scholasticism sought to bridge the gap between faith (religious beliefs) and reason (rational thinking and logic). It emphasized the compatibility of these two domains.Intellectual inquiry: Scholastic scholars engaged in debates, discussions, and critical analysis to understand complex theological and philosophical concepts. They sought to harmonize religious doctrine with philosophical ideas.Encouragement of learning: By promoting the integration of faith and reason, Scholasticism encouraged intellectual curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge. Scholars explored various subjects, including theology, philosophy, science, and literature.Influence on universities: Scholasticism played a crucial role in shaping the curriculum and methods of medieval universities. It fostered a climate of intellectual rigor, debate, and scholarly inquiry.In summary, Scholasticism's attempt to reconcile faith and reason led to an environment that encouraged learning and intellectual development during the late Middle Ages.
The right answer is option D. By trying to bring faith and reason together, Scholasticism encouraged learning.
For more such question movement
https://brainly.com/question/22359818
#SPJ8
Indingenous peiple in the __ region grew the "three sisters" crops -corn, squash and beans
Answer:
The indigenous people in the Northeastern region of North America grew the "three sisters" crops - corn, squash, and beans.
Explanation:
The "three sisters" crops were traditionally grown by indigenous peoples in the northeastern region of North America. These crops were corn, squash, and beans, and they were often grown together in a mutually beneficial relationship. Corn provided a tall stalk for the beans to climb, while the beans added nitrogen to the soil. Squash grew low to the ground and acted as a natural weed suppressor. Together, these crops provided a nutritious and sustainable source of food for indigenous communities. The practice of growing the three sisters crops is still used today by many indigenous peoples and has been adopted by non-indigenous farmers as well.
Why was Spain able to control much of the New World?
How did the Ottoman Empire respond to non-Muslims? It forced them to convert to Islam. It offered them freedom of religion. It forced them to leave the Empire. It offered them freedom of speech.
Answer:
The Ottoman Empire had a complex relationship with non-Muslims, and its policies towards different religious groups varied over time. However, the correct answer to the question "How did the Ottoman Empire respond to non-Muslims?" is that it offered them freedom of religion.
The Ottoman Empire was a Muslim empire, but it also included significant populations of Christians, Jews, and other non-Muslims. The Ottoman government recognized the existence of these non-Muslim communities and granted them certain rights and protections.
Under Ottoman rule, non-Muslims were generally allowed to practice their own religions and to maintain their own cultural traditions. They were also allowed to participate in the economy and to hold positions of power in government and society, although there were limits on their political power and social status.
This policy of religious tolerance was known as millet, which was a system of self-governance for non-Muslim communities. Under the millet system, each religious community was allowed to govern itself according to its own laws and customs, and was responsible for collecting taxes and maintaining order within its community.
While there were occasional outbreaks of violence and discrimination against non-Muslims in the Ottoman Empire, particularly during times of political turmoil, the general policy of the government was one of religious tolerance and respect for the rights of non-Muslims.
The Ottoman Empire permitted non-Muslims to practice their own religions but required them to pay the 'jizya' tax. This denotes the Empire's tolerance and strategic governance. However, the rights of non-Muslims varied throughout the Empire's existence.
Explanation:The Ottoman Empire, which was a major world power from the 14th to the early 20th centuries, had a particular policy towards non-Muslims within its domain. Rather than enforcing strict conversion to Islam, the Empire allowed non-Muslims, often referred to as 'dhimmi', the freedom to practice their own religions. However, in return for this religious freedom, dhimmis were required to pay a specific tax, known as the 'jizya'. This policy not only represents the early Ottoman Empire's tolerance towards different religions but also their strategic approach to governance and revenue generation. Nonetheless, the rights and treatment of non-Muslims varied at different periods and places within the Empire.
Learn more about Ottoman Empire's Treatment of Non-Muslims here:https://brainly.com/question/34353204
#SPJ2
Compare the rationale of the Reagan administration for the 1981 tax reductions with the rationale behind the Kennedy-Johnson tax cut of 1964, the Bush tax cut of 2001, and the Bush tax cut of 2003.
Answer:
The rationale behind the Reagan administration's tax reductions in 1981 was to stimulate economic growth and investment by reducing tax rates and increasing incentives for business investment. The administration argued that lower tax rates would encourage individuals and businesses to save and invest more, which would lead to increased economic growth and job creation.
Similarly, the Kennedy-Johnson tax cut of 1964 aimed to stimulate economic growth by reducing tax rates and increasing consumer spending. The rationale behind this tax cut was that by putting more money in consumers' pockets, they would spend more, which would boost economic growth and create jobs.
The Bush tax cut of 2001 was also aimed at stimulating economic growth, but with a focus on supply-side economics. The rationale behind this tax cut was that by reducing tax rates on individuals and businesses, it would provide an incentive for businesses to invest more, create jobs, and drive economic growth.
The Bush tax cut of 2003 was also focused on supply-side economics, but with a specific emphasis on reducing taxes on investment income and capital gains. The rationale behind this tax cut was to encourage investment and entrepreneurship by providing a favorable tax environment for investors and entrepreneurs.
Overall, the rationales behind these tax cuts were generally focused on stimulating economic growth and investment by reducing tax rates and increasing incentives for businesses and individuals to save, invest, and spend more. However, the specific details and emphasis of each tax cut varied depending on the economic conditions and policy priorities of the time.
Use the drop-down menu to complete each statement.
After World War II, US national security focused on preventing the spread of
.
The House Un-American Activities Committee had many Americans
.
After World War II, US national security focused on preventing the spread of communism.
The House Un-American Activities Committee had many Americans accused of being communists.
After World War II, the focus of US national security was primarily on preventing the spread of communism, particularly the influence of Soviet ideology. The Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union intensified concerns about the infiltration of communist beliefs and activities within American society. In this context, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) played a significant role.The HUAC was established to investigate potential subversive activities and loyalty to the United States. It conducted highly controversial hearings to identify individuals who were believed to be members or sympathizers of the Communist Party. The committee targeted various sectors, including the entertainment industry, academia, and government, and accused many Americans of being communists or having communist affiliations. The HUAC hearings created a climate of fear and suspicion, leading to the blacklisting of individuals and damaging their careers and reputations.While the HUAC was intended to safeguard national security, its methods and practices were highly controversial. Critics argue that it violated civil liberties, stifled free speech, and fostered a climate of McCarthyism, characterized by unfounded accusations and witch hunts for alleged communist sympathizers. The HUAC's activities and its impact on American citizens highlighted the tensions between national security concerns and protecting individual rights in the context of ideological struggles during the Cold War era.The complete question should be What was the focus of US national security after World War II in terms of preventing the spread of ideology, and what role did the House Un-American Activities Committee play in relation to American citizens?For more such questions on communism
https://brainly.com/question/26390983
#SPJ8
what was the impact of king philip's war (also called metacom's war), 1675-1676 ? great britain formed the new england confederation to protect against native american attacks new england tribes and colonists successfully preserved their friendship treaties in the long run, white colonists were able to further encroach west on native lands after the war native americans up and down the atlantic coast began rebelling against colonial rule when they learned what happened to their new england counterparts
Answer:King Philip's War has been called United States' most devastating conflict. One in 10 soldiers on both sides was killed, 1,200 colonists' homes were burned, and vast stores of foodstuffs destroyed. The effects of the carnage and property damage were felt for years by colonists.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements best describes how popular sovereignty applies to federalism?
1. The people elect local government representatives, who in turn choose national representatives.
2. The people elect representatives, who have the power to govern however they choose.
3. The people elect local government representatives, who gather to make federal laws.
4. The people elect representatives, who can only do what the people give them authority to do.
All five Great Lakes are governed and shared by both United States and Canada (A) True B False
All five Great Lakes are governed and shared by both the United States and Canada. A) True.
Both the United States and Canada share the Great Lakes, which are comprised of Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario. The Great Lakes are bodies of water that are jointly managed since their international border passes through them.
To control and manage the usage and preservation of the Great Lakes environment, the United States and Canada have developed agreements and treaties, such as the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. These accords seek to protect the Great Lakes' water quality for the benefit of both countries while ensuring collaboration, conservation, and sustainable management of shared resources.
Learn more about Great Lakes:
brainly.com/question/858802
#SPJ4
what device did wilber o’atwater build in the late 1800’s to measure the calorie content of foods?
Answer:
Wilbur O. Atwater did not build a specific device to measure the calorie content of foods in the late 1800s. However, he was a prominent nutrition scientist who conducted experiments to determine the calorie content of foods using a bomb calorimeter. The bomb calorimeter is a device used to measure the heat energy produced when a sample of food or other combustible material is burned completely. This energy measurement can then be used to estimate the calorie content of the food.
Read the passage from journalist and photographer Jacob Riis about a German immigrant family living in a New York City tenement.
There were nine in the family: husband, wife, an aged grandmother, and six children. . . . All nine lived in two rooms, one about ten feet square that served as parlor, bedroom, and eating-room, the other a small hall-room made into a kitchen. The rent was seven dollars and a half a month, more than a week’s wages for the husband a father, who was the only bread-winner in the family.
–Jacob Riis, How the Other Half Lives
What does this passage imply about the impact of immigration at this time?
Housing was crowded and unsanitary, partly because of the arrival of millions of immigrants.
American cities had few problems accommodating the immigrants who arrived in the late 1800s.
Housing in New York City was tightly regulated and monitored by city officials.
New York City had started the building of massive public housing projects.
The passage implies that immigration led to crowded and unsanitary housing conditions in New York City.
The passage from Jacob Riis's "How the Other Half Lives" suggests that the impact of immigration at that time resulted in crowded and unsanitary housing conditions.
The description of a German immigrant family living in a New York City tenement highlights the cramped living arrangements they endured. Nine individuals, including parents, children, and an aged grandmother, were forced to live in just two rooms. One room served multiple purposes as a parlor, bedroom, and eating area, while the other room was a small hall-room converted into a kitchen. The high rent of seven dollars and a half per month, which exceeded the husband's weekly wages, indicates the financial strain faced by immigrant families in securing suitable housing.This passage implies that the arrival of millions of immigrants contributed to the overcrowded and unsanitary housing conditions prevalent in American cities during that time.
The influx of immigrants seeking better opportunities and economic prosperity strained the housing infrastructure, leading to inadequate living conditions for many families.The passage does not suggest that housing was tightly regulated or that New York City had implemented massive public housing projects at that specific time.Instead, it emphasizes the challenging living conditions faced by immigrant families due to limited space and high rents, shedding light on the impact of immigration on housing during that era.
For more questions on immigration
https://brainly.com/question/29998020
#SPJ8
BeautyBlink Co is a retailer of ladies clothing and accessories. The business operates in many locations around Malaysia and has expanded steadily from its base in Asia. Each branch has up to 10 staff working there, and most of the accounting systems are designed and implemented to monitor the operation. The business’s main market is aimed at 18 to 40 year old and item prices are mid to low range. The company’s year end was 31 December 2021.
In the past, the business has bulk ordered its clothing and accessories twice a year. However, if their items failed to meet the key fashion trends, then this resulted in significant inventory write downs. As a result of this, the business has recently introduced a just in time ordering system (JIT). The fashion buyersmake an assessment nine months in advance as to what the key trends are likely to be, these items are sourced from their suppliers, however only limited numbers are initially ordered.
BeautyBlink Co has an internal audit department. Their role mainly advising all staff regarding accounting system implemented and regularly perform inventory counts at the stores. Internal audit department consist of five staff, all of whom have been employed at BeautyBlink for a minimum of five years and some for as experienced as ten years. In the past exercised, the chief internal auditor appoints staff within their internal audit department not through chief executive officer (CEO). The chief internal auditor reports directly to the finance director for every concern arising during monthly meetings. The finance director also assists the chief internal auditor in deciding on the scope of work of the internal audit department.
Required:
(a) Explain additional assignments that the internal audit department of BeautyBlink Co could be asked to perform by those charged with governance. (10 marks)
The additional assignments that the internal audit department of BeautyBlink Co could be asked to perform by those charged with governance include: Risk Assessments; Compliance Audits; Fraud Detection and Prevention; Operational Audits; IT Audits; Governance and Ethics; and Continuous Monitoring and Improvement.
The internal audit department of BeautyBlink Co could be asked to perform several additional assignments by those charged with governance. These assignments can help enhance the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management, and governance processes within the organization. The internal audit department can conduct comprehensive risk assessments across different areas of the business.
Learn more about audit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29575176
#SPJ4
Which one of the following Canadian provinces has the largest Francophone population? A Alberta B British Colombia D E New Brunswick Quebec Ontario
The Canadian province with the largest Francophone population is D) Quebec.
French is the official language of Quebec, which is renowned as Canada's most heavily French-speaking province. French is the first language of the vast majority of people in Quebec. Quebec has a strong cultural background that is based on French history and customs.
New Brunswick and Ontario, two other provinces in Canada, each have sizeable Francophone populations, but Quebec stands out as having the biggest and most noticeable Francophone community.
Learn more about Quebec:
brainly.com/question/31889693
#SPJ4
The correct question is:
Which one of the following Canadian provinces has the largest Francophone population? A. Alberta B. British Colombia C. New Brunswick D. Quebec E. Ontario
although enslaved people were emancipated in the 1800s, this period also marked the beginning of a new understanding of race known as:
Answer:
The period after emancipation marked the rise of scientific racism and the concept of race as a biological determinant of human abilities, traits and capacities. This new, "scientific" understanding of race is known as:
• Racial essentialism - The notion that racial groups possess intrinsic, genetically determined qualities that distinguish them as superior or inferior. Racial groups were seen as having fixed, inherent "essences" that shaped their attributes and behaviors.
• Racial hierarchy - The idea that racial groups could be ranked on an evolutionary scale based on assumed innate intellectual, moral and cultural capacities. Whites were placed at the top, followed by other groups.
• Scientific racism - The use of pseudoscientific theories, research and classification systems to argue that racial differences were inborn and immutable. This supposedly "proved" the superiority of whites and inferiority of nonwhites.
• Racialization - The process of ascribing particular biological characteristics and capacities to racial groups, transforming socially constructed race into an inherent biological reality. This "naturalized" racial differences and hierarchies.
These racial ideologies arose and gained credibility in the late 1800s, following the end of slavery. They provided a veneer of scientific validity for racist attitudes, discrimination and segregationist policies. They endured for decades, influencing institutions and popular thought well into the 20th century.
So the post-emancipation period marked a shift from race being based primarily on social and legal categories to becoming rooted in purported biological and genetic differences. This "new racism" justified the continuation of racial inequity in the supposed name of science.
After World War II, how did U.S. foreign policy change?
OA. The United States changed to a foreign policy of containing
communism with humanitarian efforts.
OB. The United States changed to a foreign policy of stopping
communism through diplomatic means only.
C. The United States changed to a foreign policy of ignoring
communism at all times.
D. The United States changed to a foreign policy of containing
communism by any means necessary.
Answer: C
Explanation: The United States changed to a foreighn policy of ignoring communism at all times.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
D. The United States changed to a foreign policy of containing communism by any means necessary.
Explanation:
After World War II, the United States changed its foreign policy to a policy of containing communism by any means necessary.
The correct answer is:
D. The United States changed to a foreign policy of containing communism by any means necessary.
How did crop increase production in the agricultural revolution
Answer:
Factors that help to increase crop production in the agricultural revolution are the following:
1-fertilizers: Synthetic fertilizers containing essential nutrients were widely used. They provided crops with the necessary elements for growth to increase productivity.
2-Irrigation: Advanced irrigation techniques help farmers to supply water to crops in regions. This helped improved crop yields.\
3 - Improved seed varieties: New high-yielding seed varieties were used, These improved seeds to higher crop yields.
4-Mechanization: Farm machinery like tractors, led to increased efficiency, larger cultivated areas, and planting and harvesting.
5-development of infrastructure: it also led to increasing efficiency and production
Why did Europeans enslave Africans for labor in the Americas? There weren’t enough criminals and captives to do the work. They had already exploited and decimated Indigenous populations in the Americas. Enslavers were afraid to enslave Indigenous people because they were outnumbered by them. Indigenous people demanded to be paid for labor, so enslavers captured Africans instead.
Answer:
Europeans enslaved Africans for labor in the Americas primarily because they had already exploited and decimated Indigenous populations in the Americas, and there weren't enough Indigenous peoples available to do the work.
As European powers began to establish colonies in the Americas, they relied heavily on forced labor to extract resources and establish profitable economies. At first, they attempted to use Indigenous peoples as laborers, but these populations were quickly decimated by European diseases and forced labor, and many Indigenous peoples actively resisted enslavement and exploitation.
As a result, European powers turned to the transatlantic slave trade to obtain a steady supply of forced labor. Millions of Africans were forcibly taken from their homes and transported across the Atlantic to work on plantations and in mines in the Americas. This system of slavery was brutal and dehumanizing, and it had devastating effects on both the enslaved Africans and their descendants, as well as on the societies and economies of the Americas.
Answer:
B.They had already exploited and decimated Indigenous populations in the Americas.
Explanation:
I just took the test and did fine.
I hope to help
edge2020
Without the debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, what would be missing from the Constitution?
Answer: D. Written individual rights
Explanation: I got it right on FLVS
The debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were beneficial because, Without a bill of rights, the Constitution would not be able to sufficiently protect the rights of individuals and the states.
Federalists felt that a more powerful central government would strengthen ties between states and contribute to building a "more perfect union," as the Constitution put it. On the other hand, anti-federalists were concerned that a federal government with more authority would be more prone to tyranny.
The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists have four things in common: they both believe in individual rights and liberties; they both fear tyranny; they both want to establish a stable and effective government; and they both want to establish a government that serves the needs of the people.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/32211450
#SPJ2
as a follow-up to the supreme court rulings in brown v. board of education of topeka (1954, 1955). in which the court found that it was
As a follow-up to the Supreme Court rulings in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka they use race as a factor in deciding how to assign students to schools.
What was Court rulings in Brown v. Board of Education?In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court declared racial segregation of students in public schools to be unconstitutional. It overturned the "separate but equal" tenet established in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case and marked the end of officially sanctioned racial segregation in American schools.
Race is taken into consideration when deciding how to assign pupils to schools as a follow-up to the decisions made by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Learn more about Supreme Court at:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
complete question;
As a follow-up to the Supreme Court rulings in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954, 1955), in which the Court found that it was unconstitutional to maintain separate schools for children on the basis of race, the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that school districts may no longer:
read each question and choose the best answer. how did president roosevelt believe that the government should manage national forests? a. he thought national forests should be preserved and left untouched. b. he discouraged conservation and supported lumber businesses. c. he preferred to combine conservation with the use of public land for its resources. d. he argued government did not have a role to play in land management.
Answer:C
Explanation: