The given statement " Agencies take longer than Congress to act but are more effective" is false because Agencies and Congress have different roles and functions in the legislative and regulatory processes.
While agencies are responsible for implementing and enforcing laws, Congress is responsible for creating and passing legislation. Agencies typically have more specialized knowledge and expertise in specific areas, allowing them to dive deeper into complex policy issues and develop detailed regulations.
However, the rulemaking process of agencies often involves multiple steps, including public notice and comment periods, which can lengthen the time it takes for them to act.
On the other hand, Congress has the authority to pass laws, and it can act more quickly in certain situations, especially in times of urgency or crisis. Congress is responsible for representing the interests of the public, and its members are elected to make decisions on behalf of their constituents. However, the legislative process in Congress can be lengthy and subject to political negotiations and debates.
To learn more about Agencies and Congress here
https://brainly.com/question/32103885
#SPJ4
The goal of regulatory agencies is to create policies and establish regulations to ensure that transportation activities are conducted in a sound manner. Which of the following best describes why that is so challenging? a. Regulators are swayed by their favoritism for certain modes which creates conflict. b. The key issues that impact society are ever changing. c. They must balance the interests of freight carriers, shippers, industry groups and citizens. d. The facts around how transportation operates and its impact on society are complicated.
They must balance the interests of freight carriers, shippers, industry groups, and citizens best describes why that is so challenging. The correct option is c.
Due to a number of factors, regulatory agencies find it difficult to develop transportation policies and regulations. In order to satisfy all stakeholders, they must first balance the competing interests of freight carriers, shippers, industry associations and citizens. regulations must constantly be modified due to the dynamic nature of transportation issues which are influenced by societal and technological advancements.
The regulatory process is further complicated by the complex operations and broad effects of transportation on society. Expertise and in-depth research are necessary to comprehend the subtleties of various transportation modes and their effects. Overall, regulatory agencies face a difficult task as they work to create sound policies that support efficient, sustainable and safe transportation while taking into account the industry's changing dynamics and diverse interests.
Learn more about regulatory agencies at:
brainly.com/question/29615821
#SPJ4
1. Identify the meaning of this lane marking: Yellow Broken Line.
O A. Traffic is going in opposite directions and it is safe to pass a vehicle.
O B. Traffic is going in same direction and it is safe to pass a vehicle.
O C. Traffic is going in opposite directions and it is NOT safe to pass a vehicle.
O D. Traffic is going in same direction and it is NOT safe to pass a vehicle.
2. If you cannot see at least
O A. 200 feet
O B. 50 feet
O C. 100 feet
O D. 60 feet
2 What is
feet in either direction down an intersecting road, it is a blind intersection.
The meaning of a yellow broken line is: B. Traffic is going in the same direction and it is safe to pass a vehicle.
If you cannot see at leastC. 100 feetin either direction down an intersecting road, it is a blind intersection.What is lane marking?A yellow line on the road means that you can pass other cars safely as long as you are going in the same direction.
So, When you see a yellow line with breaks, it means you can move into the next lane to drive around another car if it's safe. Still be careful and check for cars before passing. Make sure there's enough room and time to pass safely.
Read more about lane marking here:
https://brainly.com/question/27840312
#SPJ1
In 1976, the British government removed the 'special category' status of paramilitary prisoners
A. resulting in the loss of "Prisoner of War" status of captured Irish Catholic paramilitary personnel.
B. led to a series of hunger strikes by Catholic prisoners in Maze Prison, leading to the deaths of 9 prisoners and of Bobby Sands (who won a parliamentary seat after his death)
C. resulted in late 1981, Sinn Fein, the IRA's political wing, formally adopted a policy of contesting elections while also supporting the continued use of violence to achieve its ends.
D. All of the above
In 1976, the British government removed the 'special category' status of paramilitary prisoners D. All of the above
Irish Catholic paramilitary personnel who were captured lost their "Prisoner of War" status as a result of the abolition of the special category classification. They were no longer regarded as prisoners of war and were instead handled like regular criminals. Prisoners who were Catholic in Maze Prison went on a string of hunger strikes once the special category status was removed. The most well-known hunger strike was conducted in 1981 and was led by Irish Republican Army (IRA) soldier Bobby Sands.
Bobby Sands was among the nine detainees who passed away during the hunger strike as a result of their protest. In a by-election held just before he passed away, Sands was chosen to serve in the British Parliament. Further Sinn Fein, the political arm of the IRA, formally established a strategy in late 1981 in response to the elimination of the special category status and the circumstances surrounding the hunger strikes. Elections were contested while yet encouraging the continuous use of violence to further political goals.
Read more about prisoners on:
https://brainly.com/question/28239411
#SPJ4
New York's SHIELD Act. New York recently passed the SHIELD Act, a law that states that if you do business online from anywhere in the world, and you are a customer that lives in the state of New York, your business comes under the laws of the state of New York. (See the Tripwire article linked below.) Do you think a state should be able to extend its jurisdiction worldwide like this? Do you think businesses will start to refuse service online for customers who live in states with overreaching cyber laws? Or, do you think businesses will adjust and learn to cope with 50 different sets of state laws in cyber? Do you think the framers of our Constitution gave us a set of laws flexible enough to handle these kinds of situations? How is this different from the California Consumer Privacy Act? Compare and contrast these two laws. New York Passes a Law that Further Expands Cyber Protection (tripwire.com) California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) | State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General
The SHIELD Act passed in New York allows the state to extend its jurisdiction worldwide for businesses conducting online activities with New York customers.
The SHIELD Act gives New York the power to exercise global jurisdiction over companies that conduct internet business with residents of New York. There is disagreement over whether a state should have such broad global authority. To avoid the complications of compliance, some organizations may decide to reject service to customers in jurisdictions with stringent cyber laws. However, some organizations might decide to modify their procedures and adjust to the various cyber regulations of other states.
The Constitution's creators did offer a legal framework that permits adaptability and flexibility to changing circumstances. To successfully handle the problems created by international online transactions and data privacy, however, existing rules may need to be substantially refined given the quick growth of cyber-related issues.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), in contrast to the SHIELD Act, places more of an emphasis on privacy protection. According to the CCPA, people of California have certain rights regarding their personal information. These rights include the right to access and correct their personal information, the right to know what data is collected and how it is used, and the right to refuse to have their data sold.
The SHIELD Act, on the other hand, imposes notification requirements in the event of data breaches and requires organizations to implement appropriate protections for the security of personal information. Although both laws deal with internet privacy, their methods and purviews are different.
To know more about SHIELD Act here https://brainly.com/question/29645014
#SPJ4
"Arbitration; Jurisdiction. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Terms of Use (including any breach thereof), the fye.com Site, any Content or any item purchased from the fye.com Site shall be settled by confidential arbitration in Albany, New York administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Arbitration Rules (including without limitation the Supplementary Procedures for Consumer-Related Disputes), and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Any such controversy or claim shall be arbitrated on an individual basis and shall not be consolidated with any claim or controversy of any other party. The foregoing shall not preclude fye.com from seeking any injunctive relief in State or Federal courts located in Albany, New York for protection of fye.com's or fye.com licensor's intellectual property rights, and you consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in such courts and waive any objection to the laying of venue of any such litigation in the New York courts and agree not to plead or claim in any New York court that such litigation brought therein has been brought in an inconvenient forum."
Could the wording and requirements of FYE's arbitration clause cause any potential issues for FYE customers? Do you think requiring arbitration of all claims is an equitable and fair business practice?
FYE's arbitration clause limits customers' legal options and may create an imbalance of power, requiring professional legal advice.
Customers may have problems with FYE's arbitration clause because it restricts their legal options and waives their right to file lawsuits. Customers' ability to join class actions may be constrained by the demand for individual, confidential arbitration and the ban on consolidating claims.
The clause may lead to a power disparity by allowing FYE to seek injunctive relief in court while restricting customers to arbitration. It's up for debate whether requiring arbitration is just and equitable. It is wise to speak with a legal expert for guidance based on your particular situation and the relevant laws.
Learn more about arbitration at:
brainly.com/question/24847253
#SPJ4
Most lawsuits involve: individual defendants business plaintiffs and business defendants. business defendants: individual plaintiffs and individual defendants. Question 8 0/1 pts The substantive law that judges create by the opinions they issue is best described as: Statutory law. Common law. istamiciaw.
Most lawsuits involve a combination of individual defendants, business plaintiffs, and business defendants. Business defendants can face lawsuits from both individual plaintiffs and individual defendants.
The substantive law that judges create through their opinions is best described as common law.
Lawsuits typically involve different parties with various roles. In many cases, lawsuits involve individual defendants, referring to individuals who are being sued. Additionally, business plaintiffs, which are companies or organizations bringing forward the lawsuit, are common in legal proceedings. Moreover, business defendants, which are companies or organizations being sued, are frequently involved in lawsuits.
It is important to note that business defendants can face legal action from not only business plaintiffs but also individual plaintiffs, who are individuals filing a lawsuit against a business entity or organization. This variety of parties involved reflects the diverse nature of legal disputes and the potential combinations of individuals and businesses in the litigation process.
The legal rules and concepts that establish people's and organizations' rights and obligations are referred to as the substantive law. This body of law is significantly shaped by the decisions and opinions of judges. Judges interpret and apply existing laws to particular circumstances in common law systems, such those in the United States and England, setting legal precedents that direct future decisions.
These precedents are incorporated into the common law, which grows and changes as a result of judicial decisions throughout time. Common law is generally obtained from court rulings, as opposed to statutory law, which is passed by legislative bodies. Therefore, common law is the best way to describe the substantive law that judges produce through their judgements.
To know more about lawsuits here https://brainly.com/question/29485327
#SPJ4
scuss what is meant by prescription in terms of south African law and identify the factors that may lead to the i)
suspension
In South African law, prescription refers to the extinguishment or expiration of a legal claim or right due to the passage of time. It is a legal principle that aims to promote certainty and finality in legal relationships.
Factors that may lead to the suspension of prescription include:
Acknowledgment of the debt or claim: If a debtor acknowledges the existence of the debt or claim, whether explicitly or implicitly, it interrupts the prescription period. This acknowledgment can be in the form of a written admission, a part-payment, or any other act that implies recognition of the debt.
Legal proceedings or arbitration: Initiating legal proceedings or arbitration in relation to the debt or claim suspends prescription. This means that the prescription period stops running during the duration of the proceedings.
Insolvency or business rescue proceedings: When a debtor becomes insolvent or enters into business rescue proceedings, prescription is suspended. This ensures that creditors have an opportunity to assert their claims in the appropriate forum.
To learn more about prescription, here
https://brainly.com/question/31062675
#SPJ4
Do you feel like the number of crimes needs to be divided (normalized) by the population of each census tract? Why or why not? (I want you to think which way is more reliable analysis result to see the relative risk of the crime in each census tract) whether the number of crimes needs to be normalized by the population of each census tract or not. Then, explain why or why no
Number of crime should be divided by the number of inhabitants in each enumeration lot.
Crime predominantly rely upon the two element for example Crime volume and crime percentage. Wrongdoing volume is essentially various wrongdoing occurred in a given year and crime percentage is relativist number that presents wrongdoing on per ca-pita premise.
In this way, rate is the quantity of violations per 100,000 home of populace. Population characteristics like changes in size and density or the demographic and socioeconomic makeup of the population were the primary focus of research on the impact of the population on crime for decades. Therefore, population density plays a significant role in both the rate and volume of crime.
Learn more about Crime volume:
brainly.com/question/30744181
#SPJ4