an approaching subway train produces a 100 db sound, and a normal conversation is about 60 db. what is the intensity ratio of these two sounds?

2.50 x 105 kg/m•s2 is a measurement of force per unit area, known as pressure.

To determine the corresponding pressure, we need to divide the force by the area it is acting upon. Without knowing the specific area, we cannot calculate the pressure. Therefore, we need additional information to provide an accurate answer. However, it is important to note that the unit for pressure in the International System of Units (SI) is the pascal (Pa), which is defined as 1 Newton per square meter (N/m2). Therefore, any measurement of force per unit area can be converted to pascals for easier comparison and understanding.

The given value, 2.50 x 10^5 kg/m•s^2, represents pressure since it has units similar to Pascal (Pa), which is the standard unit for pressure. Pressure is defined as the force applied per unit area (P = F/A), and its unit can be expressed as kg/(m•s^2) or N/m^2, which is equivalent to Pascal. In this case, the pressure corresponds to 2.50 x 10^5 Pa. It is important to note that pressure can also be measured in other units, such as atmospheres (atm) or millimeters of mercury (mmHg), but the given value is in Pascals.

To know about pressure:

https://brainly.com/question/30673967

#SPJ11

Explanation:

The two teams involved in the discovery of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation were:

1. Bell Labs team led by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson: In 1964, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were conducting experiments at Bell Labs in Holmdel, New Jersey, in the United States. They were working with a large horn antenna intended for satellite communication but were puzzled by a persistent background noise that they couldn't eliminate. After ruling out various possible sources of interference, including pigeon droppings in the antenna, they realized that the noise they were detecting was coming from all directions in the sky. Eventually, they identified it as the CMB radiation, which is a remnant of the Big Bang and fills the entire universe.

2. Princeton University team led by Robert Dicke and Jim Peebles: At the same time, a team of scientists at Princeton University in New Jersey, also in the United States, led by Robert Dicke, was independently working on the theory and detection of the CMB radiation. They were motivated by the idea that if the Big Bang had occurred, there should be residual radiation left over from that event. Dicke and his team were developing a sensitive microwave receiver called a Dicke radiometer to detect this radiation. While they were still in the process of constructing their instrument, they learned about the discovery made by Penzias and Wilson. Dicke and his colleague Jim Peebles had predicted the existence of the CMB radiation as part of their work, and the discovery by Penzias and Wilson provided strong confirmation of their theory.

Both teams made significant contributions to the discovery of the CMB radiation, and their work helped establish the Big Bang theory as the leading explanation for the origin of the universe. In recognition of their groundbreaking discovery, Penzias and Wilson were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1978, while Dicke, Peebles, and two other scientists involved in related research, P. J. E. Peebles and R. W. Henry, received the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics.

This statement is True. Neptune has a highly tilted rotation axis, much like Uranus, and very unlike Saturn's. This means that Neptune's poles experience extreme seasons, with three long summers and three long winters in each Neptune year.

Additionally, the planet's magnetic field is also highly tilted, with the magnetic axis offset from the planet's center by about three-quarters of the planet's radius. Overall, these unique characteristics make Neptune an intriguing and complex planet to study. Neptune has a moderately tilted rotation axis, similar to Uranus, but not as extreme. Its axial tilt is around 28 degrees, whereas Uranus has a significant tilt of approximately 98 degrees. This is in contrast to Saturn, which has a relatively smaller tilt of about 27 degrees. Consequently, Neptune's tilt results in pronounced seasonal changes and weather patterns, as observed on Uranus, but to a lesser extent.

To know more about Uranus visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29586586

#SPJ11

The relevance of the first law of thermodynamics to biology. Energy can be freely transformed among different forms as long as the total energy is conserved. Correct option is B.

The first law of thermodynamics, also known as the law of conservation of energy, states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This principle is relevant to biology because living organisms are constantly converting energy from one form to another.

For example, photosynthetic organisms convert light energy into chemical energy stored in glucose molecules, which can then be used by other organisms through cellular respiration to produce ATP, the main source of energy for cellular processes.

The first law of thermodynamics also applies to other energy transformations that occur in biological systems, such as the breakdown of food molecules during digestion and the use of stored energy to power muscle contractions. Overall, this law emphasizes the importance of energy conservation and efficient energy use in biological systems.

To know more about thermodynamics, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21858980#

#SPJ11

Tactical displacement, one of the five forms of displacement identified by Marcus Felson and Ronald Clarke, means that crime may be displaced from one location, time, target, or offense to another as a result of situational crime prevention measures.

Situational crime prevention measures aim to make it more difficult for criminals to commit crimes by changing the environment in which crime occurs. These measures may include adding security cameras, increasing lighting, or using security guards. However, some criminals may simply move to another location, time, target, or offense, where situational crime prevention measures are less effective or absent. This is known as tactical displacement.

For example, if a parking lot installs security cameras, car thieves may move to a different parking lot that does not have cameras. Similarly, thieves may switch to stealing from a different store with fewer security measures if a store increases security measures to prevent shoplifting. Tactical displacement highlights the importance of considering the broader context and potential unintended consequences of situational crime prevention measures.

Learn more about Tactical displacement:

https://brainly.com/question/13752803

#SPJ11

For every 5.00 m the box moves along the ramp, the pushing force does 583 J of work.

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for work done, which is given by W = Fd, where W is the work done, F is the force applied, and d is the distance covered.
In this case, the force applied is constant and has a magnitude of 100 N. The distance covered along the ramp for each 5.00 m is given by the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle, with one side being 5.00 m and the other side being 3.00 m (the height gained by the box). Using Pythagoras theorem, we can find that the distance covered is 5.83 m.
Therefore, the work done by the pushing force for each 5.00 m the box moves along the ramp is given by W = 100 N x 5.83 m = 583 J (Joules). This means that for every 5.00 m the box moves along the ramp, the pushing force does 583 J of work.
It is important to note that the work done by the pushing force is equal to the increase in potential energy of the box as it gains height along the ramp. This is because work done is the product of force and distance, and in this case, the force is perpendicular to the displacement of the box, so no work is done in the horizontal direction. Therefore, all the work done goes towards increasing the potential energy of the box.

To know more about work done visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3902440
#SPJ11

The car will coast for approximately 300 meters before starting to roll back down the slope. The car's initial velocity is 28 m/s and it is traveling up a 9.0 ∘ slope when it runs out of gas.

At this point, the car will begin to slow down due to the force of gravity acting against it. Eventually, the car will come to a stop and begin to roll back down the slope. To find out how far it will coast before starting to roll back down, we need to calculate the distance traveled while the car is slowing down. This can be done using the equation d = v^2/2a, where d is the distance traveled, v is the initial velocity, and a is the acceleration due to gravity. Plugging in the values, we get d = (28^2)/(2*9.8*sin(9.0)) ≈ 300 meters.

Therefore, the car will coast for approximately 300 meters before starting to roll back down the slope.

To know about slope:

https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ11

The average distance between the two stars in the binary system is approximately 10.83 astronomical units (AU).

Using Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion, we can determine the average distance between the two stars in a binary system.

The formula for Kepler's Third Law is: P² = a³ / (M1 + M2)

Where P is the orbital period (in years), a is the average distance between the stars (in astronomical units, or AU), M1 and M2 are the masses of the stars (in solar masses), and M1 + M2 is the combined mass of the system.

Given the combined mass (M1 + M2) is 7.5 solar masses and the orbital period (P) is 13 years, we can rearrange the formula to solve for a:

a³ = P² * (M1 + M2)

a³ = (13²) * (7.5)

a³ = 169 * 7.5

a³ ≈ 1267.5

Now, we can take the cube root of both sides to find the average distance

(a) in AU:

a ≈ ₁₀√1267.5

a ≈ 10.83 AU

Learn more about Kepler’s Third Law at

https://brainly.com/question/3435405

#SPJ11

Answer:

It took around 4 hours and 47 minutes to reach the vacation spot, including the stop for gas and snacks.

Explanation:

To solve this problem, we can use the formula:

time = distance / speed

In this case, the distance is 215 miles and the speed is 45 miles per hour. So,

time = 215 miles / 45 miles per hour = 4.78 hours or approximately 4 hours and 47 minutes.

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf t = 4.78\ hours}[/tex]

Explanation:

Distance = S = 215 miles

Average speed = v = 45 mph

Time = t = ?

v = s/t

Put the given data in the above formula.

45 = 215/t

t = 215/45

[tex]\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

So, the car's speed after it has traveled 25 meters is most nearly 22.36 m/s.

The equation for acceleration is a = (v_f - v_i) / t, where a is acceleration, v_f is final velocity, v_i is initial velocity (in this case, zero), and t is time. We know that a = 10 m/s^2 and we want to find v_f after the car has traveled 25 meters. So we need to rearrange the equation to solve for v_f:

a = (v_f - v_i) / t
10 m/s^2 = (v_f - 0) / t
10 m/s^2 * t = v_f

Now we need to find t. We can use the equation d = v_i * t + 1/2 * a * t^2, where d is distance. We know that d = 25 meters, v_i = 0, and a = 10 m/s^2, so we can plug those values in and solve for t:

25 meters = 0 * t + 1/2 * 10 m/s^2 * t^2
25 meters = 5t^2
t^2 = 5 meters
t = sqrt(5) meters (since t has to be positive)

Now we can plug in t to find v_f:

v_f = 10 m/s^2 * sqrt(5) meters
v_f = 22.36 m/s (rounded to two decimal places)

So the car's speed after it has traveled 25 meters is most nearly 22.36 m/s.
A car initially at rest accelerates at 10 m/s² and travels 25 meters. To find its speed after traveling this distance, we can use the equation:

v² = u² + 2as

where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity (0 m/s in this case), a is the acceleration (10 m/s²), and s is the distance traveled (25 m).

v² = 0² + 2(10)(25)
v² = 0 + 500
v² = 500

Now, we'll take the square root of both sides to find the final velocity:

v = √500
v ≈ 22.36 m/s

To know more about accelerates visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/12550364

#SPJ11

Spacecraft have observed and measured them. The assertion provides the greatest justification for our certainty that the particles in Neptune's rings are quite tiny. Here option D is the correct answer.

The rings of Neptune are made up of a variety of particles, including dust, pebbles, and boulders. However, we can be sure that the particles in the rings of Neptune are very small because they have been observed and measured by spacecraft.

During the Voyager 2 flyby of Neptune in 1989, the spacecraft captured detailed images of the rings and collected data on the size, composition, and distribution of the particles. The data showed that the particles in the rings of Neptune range in size from tiny dust particles to larger boulder-sized chunks.

In addition to the Voyager 2 data, more recent observations by the Hubble Space Telescope have provided further evidence that the particles in the rings of Neptune are small. Hubble's observations have revealed clumps and arcs in the rings, which suggest that the particles are small and prone to clumping together due to their mutual gravitational attraction.

To learn more about Neptune's rings

https://brainly.com/question/29413835

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Which of the following statements best explains why we can be sure that the particles in the rings of Neptune are very small?

A) They are made of a low-density material

B) They do not produce significant gravitational effects

C) They are composed of ice and rock fragments

D) They have been observed and measured by spacecraft

Answer:

[tex]0.00005\,\rm m^3 \,and\, 800\,\rm kg/m^3[/tex]

Explanation:

Weight of water = 0.75 - 0.25 = 0.5 N

Mass of water = 0.5/10 = 0.05 kg

Hence volume of water is 0.05/1000 = 0.00005 [tex]\rm m^3[/tex]

Weight of alcohol = 0.65 - 0.25 = 0.4 N

Mass of alcohol = 0.4/10 = 0.04 kg

Density of alcohol = 0.04/0.00005 = 800 [tex]\rm kg/m^3[/tex]

The component of the net force, fnet,x, in the x-direction can be expressed as the sum of all forces acting in that direction: fnet,x = ΣFx.

To find the component of net force, fnet,x, in the x-direction, we need to consider all the forces acting in that direction. Let's assume there are n forces acting in the x-direction. Then we can write:

ΣFx = F1x + F2x + F3x + ... + Fnx

where F1x, F2x, F3x, ..., Fnx are the x-components of the individual forces.

We can then substitute the expressions for each of the individual x-components of the forces. For example, if we have a force F1 acting at an angle θ1 to the x-axis, we can use trigonometry to find its x-component:

F1x = F1 cos(θ1)

Similarly, for all the other forces, we can find their x-components and add them up to get the total sum of forces in the x-direction. This gives us the expression for the component of the net force, fnet,x, in the x-direction:

fnet,x = ΣFx

For more such questions on net force, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/14361879

#SPJ11

The likely drift speed of the electrons in the filament of a light bulb is approximately 10^-4 m/s.

Drift speed is a measure of the average speed of electrons moving through a conductor, such as a filament in a light bulb, under the influence of an electric field. The drift speed is generally quite slow compared to the speed of light and depends on various factors such as the applied voltage, material properties, and temperature.

In the case of a light bulb filament, which is typically made of tungsten, the drift speed of electrons is estimated to be around 10^-4 m/s. This slow drift speed occurs because the electrons constantly collide with the lattice structure of the conductor, which slows them down significantly. Despite the slow drift speed, the light bulb still lights up almost instantly because the electric field propagates through the conductor at a speed close to the speed of light. This fast propagation ensures that the electrons at the far end of the filament start moving almost immediately, even though their actual drift speed is quite slow.

To know more about the drift speed, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/15398174

#SPJ11

The image distance (v) is 26.25 cm. We can use the formula for focal length of a concave mirror:  1/f = 1/do + 1/di
Where f is the focal length, do is the object distance, and di is the image distance.

We know that the focal length is 15 cm, and the object distance is 35 cm. Plugging these values into the formula:
1/15 = 1/35 + 1/di
Now we can solve for di:
1/di = 1/15 - 1/35
1/di = (7 - 3)/105
1/di = 4/105
di = 26.25 cm
So the image distance is 26.25 cm.

Using the formula for focal length of a concave mirror, we can calculate that the image distance is 26.25 cm when the object is 35 cm from the mirror. To find the image distance for a concave mirror, you can use the mirror formula:
1/f = 1/u + 1/v
where f is the focal length, u is the object distance, and v is the image distance.
Given the focal length (f) is 15 cm and the object distance (u) is 35 cm, we can substitute these values into the formula:
1/15 = 1/35 + 1/v
To solve for the image distance (v), first find the common denominator and then subtract 1/35 from both sides:
(35 - 15) / (15 * 35) = 1/v
20 / 525 = 1/v
Now, take the reciprocal of both sides to find v:
v = 525 / 20
v = 26.25 cm

To know more about concave mirror visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/13101215

#SPJ11

Even with infinitely powerful telescopes, we can look back in time only until the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), around 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

The Cosmic Microwave Background is the earliest observable stage of the universe's history. Before the CMB, the universe was in a hot, dense state known as the "opaque plasma" where photons were constantly scattered by charged particles, making it impossible to see through.

Approximately 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the universe cooled down enough for atoms to form, allowing photons to travel freely. This event is called "recombination," and the released photons created the CMB. Even with infinitely powerful telescopes, we cannot observe anything prior to the CMB because light did not travel freely in the opaque plasma.

Learn more about photons here:

https://brainly.com/question/31226374

#SPJ11

A Cepheid variable is an important astronomical object because it is considered a "standard candle." A standard candle is a type of astronomical object that has a well-known intrinsic brightness, which allows astronomers to use it to determine the distance to other objects in the universe.

Since Cepheid variables are relatively bright and can be observed in distant galaxies, they have been used extensively to measure the distances to galaxies beyond our own Milky Way. This has allowed astronomers to map the large-scale structure of the universe and study the expansion of the universe itself. In fact, the discovery of Cepheid variables played a crucial role in the development of modern cosmology and the determination of the Hubble constant, which describes the rate at which the universe is expanding.

In summary, Cepheid variables are important because they are a reliable way for astronomers to measure distances to other galaxies, which in turn has allowed us to better understand the large-scale structure of the universe and the fundamental properties of our cosmos.

To know more about astronomical visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1764951

#SPJ11

The two major lines of evidence that support the Big Bang theory and have not been successfully explained by alternative models are:

The existence and specific characteristics of the observed cosmic microwave background (CMB): The CMB is a form of radiation that fills the entire universe and is believed to be the leftover heat from the early universe when it was hot and dense. The Big Bang theory predicts the existence of the CMB and its specific characteristics, such as its uniformity and specific temperature fluctuations, which have been observed and confirmed through various experiments.

The observed overall chemical composition of the universe: The Big Bang theory predicts that the early universe was primarily composed of hydrogen and helium, with trace amounts of other elements. Observations of the chemical composition of the universe have confirmed this prediction and provide strong support for the Big Bang theory.

The other options provided in the question are not accurate as they do not represent the two major lines of evidence that support the Big Bang theory. The expansion of the universe is actually a consequence of the Big Bang theory, rather than evidence for it. The observed ratio of spiral to elliptical galaxies is not a major line of evidence for the Big Bang theory. The episode of inflation and separation of gravity from other forces are both aspects of the Big Bang theory itself and not independent lines of evidence supporting it. Lastly, the statement "the early universe was hot and dense" is a prediction of the Big Bang theory and not a line of evidence supporting it.

Learn more about Big Bang theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/1933033

#SPJ11

A child on a merry-go-round both revolves and rotates around the merry-go-round's axis.

Rotation refers to the circular movement of an object around its own axis. In this case, the merry-go-round itself is rotating around its axis as it spins, and so is the child, who is sitting on the merry-go-round. Therefore, the child rotates around the merry-go-round's axis.

Revolution refers to the circular motion of an object around another object or point. In this case, the child is also revolving around the merry-go-round's axis as the merry-go-round spins. This motion can be described as a combination of rotation and translation, as the child is moving around the axis while also moving in a circle with the merry-go-round.

Overall, the motion of a child on a merry-go-round involves both rotation and revolution around the merry-go-round's axis.

Learn more about e merry-go-round's axis. here:

https://brainly.com/question/2616315

#SPJ11

The biosphere includes all the parts of Earth that support life, which includes the atmosphere, hydrosphere (water), and lithosphere (land). However, within these spheres, there are certain regions that are inhospitable to life, such as the polar ice caps, deserts, and deep ocean trenches. The biosphere also includes the living organisms themselves, from bacteria and fungi to plants and animals.

Therefore, the biosphere would not necessarily exclude any specific parts of the Earth, but rather it would encompass all regions that support or can support life in some way. However, certain regions may have lower levels of biodiversity or have specific adaptations for survival, such as the extremophiles found in deep-sea vents or hot springs.

To know more about biosphere click this link -

brainly.com/question/20531374

#SPJ11

If two 2.50 cm × 2.50 cm plates that form a parallel-plate capacitor are charged to ± 0.708 nC,  a) The potential difference is 47.2 V, b) The electric field strength is 31.5 kV/m, c) The potential difference is 94.4 V.

a) The potential difference across a capacitor can be calculated using the formula V = Q / C, where V is the potential difference, Q is the charge on the capacitor, and C is the capacitance.

The capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor is given by C = ε₀A / d, where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space, A is the area of the plates, and d is the spacing between the plates.

Plugging in the given values, we have C = (8.85 × 10⁻¹² F/m) * (2.50 cm * 2.50 cm) / (1.50 mm).
Solving for C gives C = 5.54 × 10⁻¹² F.

Substituting this value and the charge Q = ± 0.708 nC into the formula V = Q / C yields V = (± 0.708 nC) / (5.54 × 10⁻¹² F) = ± 47.2 V.

b) The electric field strength inside a parallel-plate capacitor is given by E = V / d, where E is the electric field strength and d is the spacing between the plates.

Plugging in the given values, we have E = (± 47.2 V) / (3.00 mm) = ± 31.5 kV/m.

c) Using the same formula V = Q / C, but with the new spacing between the plates, we have C = (8.85 × 10⁻¹² F/m) * (2.50 cm * 2.50 cm) / (3.00 mm). Solving for C gives C = 7.38 × 10⁻¹² F.

Substituting this value and the charge Q = ± 0.708 nC into the formula V = Q / C yields V = (± 0.708 nC) / (7.38 × 10⁻¹² F) = ± 94.4 V.

To know more about potential difference, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/23716417#
#SPJ11

To convert standard atmospheric pressure into Pascals, we can use the conversion factor of 1 atm = 101,325 Pa.

To convert standard atmospheric pressure (atm) into Pascals (Pa), we need to know the conversion factor between these units. The standard atmospheric pressure is defined as 1 atm, which is equivalent to 101,325 Pa. Therefore, we can use this conversion factor to convert any given pressure value from atm to Pa.

1.) To convert 10.2 atm into Pa, we can use the formula:
Pressure in Pa = Pressure in atm x Conversion factor
= 10.2 atm x 101,325 Pa/atm
= 1,033,455 Pa
Therefore, 10.2 atm is equivalent to 1,033,455 Pa.

2.) To convert 2.05 atm into Pa, we can use the same formula:
Pressure in Pa = Pressure in atm x Conversion factor
= 2.05 atm x 101,325 Pa/atm
= 207,961.25 Pa
Therefore, 2.05 atm is equivalent to 207,961.25 Pa.

3.) To convert 0.50 atm into Pa, we can use the same formula:
Pressure in Pa = Pressure in atm x Conversion factor
= 0.50 atm x 101,325 Pa/atm
= 50,662.5 Pa
Therefore, 0.50 atm is equivalent to 50,662.5 Pa.

In summary, to convert standard atmospheric pressure into Pascals, we can use the conversion factor of 1 atm = 101,325 Pa. By multiplying the given pressure value in atm with this conversion factor, we can obtain the equivalent pressure value in Pa.

To know more about standard atmospheric pressure into Pascals visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7299123

#SPJ11

When a ball hits a vertical, motionless wall, the final speed of the ball is always lower than the initial speed. This is due to the conservation of momentum, which states that the total momentum of a system remains constant if there are no external forces acting on it. In this case, the ball and the wall make up the system.

When the ball hits the wall, it experiences a force in the opposite direction to its initial velocity. This force causes the ball to decelerate and come to a stop. However, the momentum of the ball must be conserved, so its momentum is transferred to the wall, causing it to move slightly.

The amount of momentum transferred to the wall depends on the mass of the ball and its initial velocity. The greater the mass and velocity of the ball, the greater the momentum transferred to the wall. As a result, the ball's final speed is always lower than its initial speed.

To illustrate this concept, consider an example where a ball with a mass of 150 grams and an initial velocity of 10 m/s hits a wall. If we assume that the collision is perfectly elastic (meaning that there is no loss of energy), the momentum of the ball before the collision can be calculated as:

p = m * v
p = 0.15 kg * 10 m/s
p = 1.5 kg m/s

After the collision, the momentum of the ball is transferred to the wall, causing it to move slightly. If we assume that the wall has a mass of 10,000 kg and is stationary before the collision, its velocity after the collision can be calculated as:

v' = p / m'
v' = 1.5 kg m/s / 10,000 kg
v' = 0.00015 m/s

As we can see, the velocity of the wall is negligible compared to the initial velocity of the ball. This is because the mass of the wall is much greater than the mass of the ball. However, the momentum of the ball has been transferred to the wall, causing the ball to come to a stop. Therefore, the final speed of the ball is always lower than the initial speed.

In conclusion, the final speed of a ball after colliding with a motionless wall is always lower than the initial speed due to the conservation of momentum. The amount of momentum transferred to the wall depends on the mass and velocity of the ball, and the mass of the wall.

When a ball hits a vertical, motionless wall, the final speed is typically lower than the initial speed due to energy loss during the collision. This energy loss occurs primarily because of two factors: deformation of the ball and friction between the ball and the wall. These factors cause some of the ball's initial kinetic energy to be converted into other forms of energy, such as heat or sound, resulting in a reduced final speed.

To know more about total momentum visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/4956182

#SPJ11

When a space vehicle is launched vertically upward from the Earth's surface with an initial speed of 5.76 km/s, it will eventually reach a maximum height before falling back down due to gravity.

To determine the maximum height, we need to use the equation for the maximum height of an object in projectile motion. This equation is given by h = (v^2*sin^2(theta))/(2g), where v is the initial velocity, theta is the launch angle (which in this case is 90 degrees since the vehicle is launched vertically), and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Plugging in the given values, we get h = (5.76^2*sin^2(90))/(2*9.81) = 165 km.

Therefore, the space vehicle will attain a maximum height of 165 km before falling back down to Earth.

To know about vehicle :

https://brainly.com/question/31843052

#SPJ11

The plane traveled 2125 km north and 1812 km west after 3.40 hours.

To solve this problem, we need to break down the velocity vector into its northerly and westerly components. We can use trigonometry to do this. Let's call the northerly component "v north" and the westerly component "v west". We can find v north by multiplying the velocity (835 km/h) by the sine of the angle (41.5∘) between the velocity vector and the north direction. Similarly, we can find v west by multiplying the velocity by the cosine of the angle.

Using the trigonometric functions, we get:
v north = 835 km/h x sin(41.5∘) = 625 km/h
v west = 835 km/h x cos(41.5∘) = 533 km/h

Now, to find how far north and how far west the plane has traveled after 3.40 hours, we simply need to multiply the components by the time:
Δd north = v north x time = 625 km/h x 3.40 h = 2125 km
Δd west = v west x time = 533 km/h x 3.40 h = 1812 km

So the plane traveled 2125 km north and 1812 km west after 3.40 hours.

To know about velocity visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30559316

#SPJ11

Answer:

One must consider the phase difference between each side of the slit:

One can write Δ = W sin θ       where Δ is the phase difference between light leaving opposite sides of the slit, W = slit width, and θ is the angle of difraction

As the slit gets wider (W increases) and for a  given phase difference the angle of difraction will decrease

The bands on the screen will be closer for a wider slit

True

Compared to Earth, the Moon lacks a hydrosphere (a system of water on its surface, including oceans, lakes, and rivers), an atmosphere and a magnetosphere (a region of space influenced by a planet's magnetic field).

The Moon's surface is dry and lacks significant amounts of water, it has an extremely thin or negligible atmosphere, and it has no substantial magnetic field to create a magnetosphere.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Hydrosphere: The hydrosphere refers to the presence of water in liquid form on a planetary body. Earth has a significant hydrosphere, with about 71% of its surface covered by water in the form of oceans, seas, lakes, and rivers.

In contrast, the Moon lacks a substantial hydrosphere. While there is evidence of water ice in permanently shadowed regions near the Moon's poles, it is in the form of solid ice rather than liquid water.

Atmosphere: Earth has a dense atmosphere composed primarily of nitrogen (about 78%) and oxygen (about 21%), along with other trace gases. The atmosphere plays a crucial role in regulating temperature, supporting life, and protecting the planet from harmful radiation.

In contrast, the Moon has an extremely thin and tenuous atmosphere, often referred to as an exosphere. It consists of extremely low-density particles, such as atoms and ions, and is practically nonexistent compared to Earth's atmosphere.

Magnetosphere: Earth has a magnetic field generated by its liquid iron outer core. This magnetic field extends into space and creates a region around the planet known as the magnetosphere.

The magnetosphere protects Earth from the solar wind, a stream of charged particles emitted by the Sun. The Moon, however, lacks a significant magnetic field.

It does not have a liquid iron core like Earth, and thus, it does not generate a magnetosphere. As a result, the Moon is directly exposed to the solar wind and its associated radiation.

The absence of a hydrosphere, atmosphere, and magnetosphere on the Moon significantly influences its surface conditions and overall environment.

These factors contribute to the Moon's starkly different appearance and characteristics compared to Earth.

To know more about magnetosphere refer here

brainly.com/question/9971956#

#SPJ11

The phenomenon which made the first polythene rod heavier is because the electric charges on it made it attract more air molecules thus making it heavier.

A charged polythene rod can be used to transmit charge to an insulated conductor without contacting the two objects. The conductor is approached by bringing the negatively charged polythene rod close to it.

Electrons generate enough energy to 'rub off' onto the polythene rod and depart the atom. Electrons are rubbed off the acetate and onto the duster when the rod is replaced with a new substance, such as acetate. The rods and duster are both comprised of insulating materials.

Learn more about polythene rod:
https://brainly.com/question/23149311
#SPJ1

Full Question:

A student pit the charged polythene rod on to a balance.  The rod was separated from the metal pan of the balance by a thin block of ons laying material.  The student then held a second charged polythene rod above,  but not touching the rod.  The reading on the balance increased.  Explain

The force required to stretch the wire by 1.0 mm is approximately 0.00013 N. Length of approximately 0.0039 m or 3.9 mm of the 8.0-mm-diameter wire would be stretched by 1.0 mm with a force of 0.00013 N.

Part A:

To calculate the force required to stretch the wire by 1.0 mm, we can use Hooke's Law, which states that the force required to stretch or compress a material is directly proportional to the displacement or change in length.

The formula to calculate the force is:

F = (Y * A * ΔL) / L

F is the force

Y is Young's modulus

A is the cross-sectional area of the wire

ΔL is the change in length of the wire

L is the original length of the wire

First, we need to calculate the cross-sectional area of the wire:

A = π * (r²)

r is the radius of the wire, which is half of the diameter.

r = 4.0 mm / 2 = 2.0 mm = 0.002 m

A = π * (0.002 m)²

A ≈ 0.000012566 m²

ΔL = 1.0 mm = 0.001 m

L = 1.0 m

Y = 10 N/m²

Plugging the values into the formula:

F = (10 N/m² * 0.000012566 m² * 0.001 m) / 1.0 m

F ≈ 0.00012566 N

Rounded to two significant figures:

F ≈ 0.00013 N

Therefore, the force required to stretch the wire by 1.0 mm is approximately 0.00013 N.

Part B:

To calculate the length of the 8.0-mm-diameter wire that would be stretched by 1.0 mm with this force, we can rearrange the formula used in Part A to solve for L.

L = (Y * A * ΔL) / F

r = 8.0 mm / 2 = 4.0 mm = 0.004 m

A = π * (0.004 m)² = 0.000050265 m²

ΔL = 1.0 mm = 0.001 m

F = 0.00013 N (from Part A)

Plugging the values into the formula:

L = (10 N/m² * 0.000050265 m² * 0.001 m) / 0.00013 N

L ≈ 0.00386 m

Rounded to two significant figures:

L ≈ 0.0039 m

Therefore, a length of approximately 0.0039 m or 3.9 mm of the 8.0-mm-diameter wire would be stretched by 1.0 mm with a force of 0.00013 N.

Learn more about force at: https://brainly.com/question/15251816

#SPJ11

The index of refraction of the lens material is 2.68.

The refractive index of a lens material is given by the formula; `n = h/h'`.

Where h is the object height and h' is the height of the image.An image is created in the diverging lens that is biconcave. This means that the lens would not cause the light rays to converge but would cause them to diverge instead.

This indicates that the focal length of the lens will be negative.

As such, the lens equation to use will be `1/f = 1/v - 1/u`.

The negative sign will be assigned to the focal length of the lens to represent the fact that it is a diverging lens.

The values are:f = -15.1cm; u = -14.2cm; v = 5.29cm.

We have: `1/f = 1/v - 1/u = 1/5.29 + 1/14.2`.

Solving for f we get: `f = -9.59 cm`.

Then, the magnification `m = -v/u = 5.29/14.2 = 0.373`.

The object height can be calculated using the formula; `m = h'/h`.

From this; `h' = mh`. `h = -h' / m = -5.29 / 0.373 = -14.17 cm`.

Since the height is negative, it indicates that the object is inverted.

The refractive index `n = h/h' = 14.17/5.29 = 2.68`.

Learn more about focal length at:

https://brainly.com/question/15106610

#SPJ11