An argument made by some women suffragists was that women cared more than men about the helping poor women and children.
What do you mean by the women suffragists?Women have a legal right to vote in national or local elections, often known as woman suffrage.
Women care more than males do about social concerns including poverty, education, and public health, according to some women suffragists.
Women had a special perspective on issues affecting families and communities, according to women suffragists, because they were mothers and carers.
Most women, according to anti-suffragists, did not desire the right to vote. They said that women did not have time to vote or follow politics since they had to take care of the house and the children.
Therefore, an argument made by some women suffragists was that women cared more than men about the helping poor women and children.
To know more about the women suffragists, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27919590
#SPJ1
Why was
Czechoslovakia able to maintain a political
democracy when its neighbors did not?
The reason why Czechoslovakia was able to maintain a political democracy when its neighbors did not was that they had a history of democracy.
Why was Czechoslovakia's democracy maintained ?Czechoslovakia was able to maintain a political democracy for several reasons. One reason is that it had a well-established democratic tradition, dating back to the First Czechoslovak Republic in the 1920s and 1930s. Additionally, Czechoslovakia had a strong civil society and a relatively high level of economic development, which helped to support and strengthen democratic institutions.
Furthermore, Czechoslovakia was not occupied by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, which allowed for a greater degree of autonomy and freedom than in other Eastern European countries. Finally, Czechoslovakia had a history of political stability and a relatively peaceful transition to democracy in 1989.
Find out more on Czechoslovakia at https://brainly.com/question/9626976
#SPJ1
6. Many would refer to capitalism as the great equalizer, stating people at the bottom need capitalism in order to succeed. Explain why this is so as opposed to other forms of economic systems?
Answer:
The answer is much more complicated then whether or not "capitalism" is the great equalizer or not. Capitalism, does not, in fact, directly act as the great equalizer. An equalizer, in the most direct sense of definition, implies the usage of "equalizing", or putting all sides on level playing field. Capitalism does not directly exemplify the given definition, rather, it is exemplified in the ideal. If you were to go into depth of what is the greatest direct equalizer of the common folk, it would instead be that of a Communist ideal. Communism acts as a tangible equalizer in the restriction of both personal choices, as well as availability of choice, whether within one's lifestyle, in the products one can own and procure, as well as with one's ideal. Instead, Capitalism acts as the great equalizer in presenting what is seemingly equal opportunities. In this definition, it provides each individual equality, or the option to obtain the same resources and opportunities. For example, they may take part in public education, have the option to take part in societal-sanctioned activities that can procure them wealth, such as the stock market. However, it is important to note that while there may seem to be equal opportunities to all people, it may take different amounts of leverage from different people depending on their life. It is not the same for all people, and individuals would still have individual experiences on what "equality" can be. This is also known as Equity, where each individual has different circumstances, and must be able to make use of what they have to reach a comparable outcome to others.
Now, Capitalism is different to other forms of economic system, because it actually provides such opportunities. In comparison, Communism provides equal opportunity for little to no choices, while older systems such as the class system provides opportunity based on what class one was assigned too. As such, capitalism is as close to being a equalizer as compared to other systems, while allowing people to build a more financially stable life.
URGENT
What did you learn while analyzing the treatment of Japanese Americans during World War II? Write a few sentences to explain what you learned, what surprised you, and what challenged you.
It is important to defend overall rights of other individuals and it is incorrect to stereotype entire groups when studying how Japanese Americans were treated throughout World War II.
Why would the US join World War II?The argument about American involvement between the Pacific & European theatre of World War II was put to rest by the Japanese bombing on Pearl Harbor upon December 7, 1941. Congress proclaimed war on Japanese Troops the following day.
Why did World War II matter so much?Undoubtedly, the most important and significant event of the 20th century was World War II. The destruction is virtually beyond calculation; the number of military and civilian fatalities is estimated to be between 70 and 85 million, or around 3% of the world's population at the time.
To know more about World War II visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7745710
#SPJ1
Answer:
It is important to defend overall rights of other individuals and it is incorrect to stereotype entire groups when studying how Japanese Americans were treated throughout World War II.The argument about American involvement between the Pacific & European theatre of World War II was put to rest by the Japanese bombing on Pearl Harbor upon December 7, 1941. Congress proclaimed war on Japanese Troops the following day.Undoubtedly, the most important and significant event of the 20th century was World War II. The destruction is virtually beyond calculation; the number of military and civilian fatalities is estimated to be between 70 and 85 million, or around 3% of the world's population at the time.
Explanation:
Lantern Festival, one of the traditional Chinese festivals, also known as Shangyuan Festival, Little First Moon, Yuanxi or Lantern Festival, takes place on the fifteenth day of the first lunar month every year.
The first month is the first month of the lunar calendar, and the ancients called "night" as "xiao". According to Taoism "Sanyuan", the fifteenth day of the first lunar month is also called "Shangyuan Festival". Since ancient times, the Lantern Festival has been dominated by warm and festive lantern viewing customs.
The Lantern Festival is a traditional festival of Chinese culture, and according to the information provided, we can understand more about such customs, motivations and the history of the festival.
What is a cultural tradition?It corresponds to manifestations historically preserved by the culture of a people, that is, the set of habits, values and customs that are instituted in a place and passed on to future generations through the process of socialization, being an important part of the cultural and social identity of a group.
As well as the Lantern festival, which takes place every year in China on the 15th day of the first Chinese lunar month and aims to wish good things and light up the world, all over the world there are many traditional and cultural festivals, such as the Diwali in India, Carnival in Brazil and Day of the Dead in Mexico.
Therefore, the cultural festivals of each country are an integral and representative part of their values and histories, capable of bringing pride and perpetuating customs to the population.
Find out more about cultural festivals on:
https://brainly.com/question/15683032
#SPJ1
Why is Charles I the best example of an absolute ruler?
Answer:
Charles believed in the divine right of kings, and was determined to govern according to his own conscience. Many of his subjects opposed his policies, in particular the levying of taxes without parliamentary consent, and perceived his actions as those of a tyrannical absolute monarch.
What made Charles II an absolute monarch?
Explanation:
In 1670, Charles signed a se treaty with Louis XIV of France. Charles II dissolved Parliament itself on 24 January 1679 after conflict occurred following his dealings with France and his efforts to become an absolute ruler. It was also a period of anti-Catholic sentiment and witch-hunts.
What might the United States and/or its allies have done to prevent The Treaty of Versailles
What role did female reformers play in the Progressive era and why were there so many female activists compared to previous reform attempts in the US?
Answer:
Women became leaders in a range of social and political movements from 1890 through 1920. This period is known as the Progressive Era. Progressive reformers wanted to end political corruption, improve the lives of individuals, and increase government intervention to protect citizens.
im writing an essay on ADVENT. please give me your opinions
Answer: Maybe write about the advent of something that is important to you, or something that has affected you on a personal level.
How does the image of the Chiefs on the seal suggest unity and equality.?
Answer:
The Iroquois Confederacy
How did the Byzantine emperor deal with the hoards of crusading knights that appeared at his door?
Answer:
haseebatifdon
hshahajsjsjsjs
what are two describing words for due process
Answer:
synonyms for due process
1.authority
2.honesty
3.integrity
4.law
5.right
6.truth
7.amends
8.appeal, etc
4.
What expressed power of
Congress allows lawmakers to
adjust the minimum wage or
protect workers from harm?
Answer:
The expressed power of Congress to adjust the minimum wage or protect workers from harm is found in the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. This clause grants Congress the power "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." This power has been interpreted to include the authority to set minimum wage and labor standards, as well as to regulate working conditions.
Explanation:
Please help!!
Chapter 16
1. Compare and contrast the use of various telecommunication devices among the three generations you observed. How does age group seem to affect the use of telecommunication devices in your community? Why do you think such variation exists (or not)?
2. Based on your fieldwork, how would you characterize the role of telecommunication devices in the culture of your community? How important are these devices to their users and how do they shape interaction, relationships, and the flow of daily life?
3. Based on your own recollections or your understanding of what life was like before these telecommunication devices became mainstream, how has your culture changed as a result of becoming "wired?" Do you consider these cultural changes to be positive, negative, or neutral? Why do you feel the way you do?
Answer:
please let me know if you have the anawer
Source 1
“More than in any other era, politics in the [late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries] was revolutionary politics. It did not defend ‘age-old rights’ but, looking ahead to the future, elevated particular interests such as those of a class or a class coalition into the interests of a nation or even of humanity as a whole. . . . New political orders came into being, with new bases of legitimacy. Any return to the world as it had been previously was barred; nowhere were prerevolutionary conditions restored. . . .
Whereas previous violent overthrows had merely led to external modifications of the status quo, the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens. These two revolutions . . ., however different from each other in their aims, signaled the onset of political modernity. From then on, defenders of the existing order bore the mark of the old and obsolete.”
Jürgen Osterhammel, German historian, The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century, 2014
Source 2
“The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive. . . . The revolutions of the Americas began by drawing on ideas of [liberty and citizenship] . . . to redefine sovereignty and power within imperial polities but ended up producing new states that shared world space with reconfigured empires. The secession of states from the British, French, and Spanish empires did not produce nations of equivalent citizens any more than it produced a world of equivalent nations. . . . Popular sovereignty was far from the accepted norm in western Europe and within empires’ spaces overseas it was unclear whether the idea of [individual rights] would be a contagious proposition or one [restricted to] a select few. . . . The nation had become an imaginable possibility in world politics. But the leaders of [empires] did not want to limit their political compass to national boundaries.”
Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, historians, Empires in World History, 2010
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.
Answer all parts of the question that follows.
a) Identify ONE factor that contributed to laissez-faire economic policies becoming more popular in the period 1750–1900.
b) Describe ONE difference between mercantilist and laissez-faire economic policies.
c) Explain ONE way in which the adoption of laissez-faire economic policies led to an increase in the share of global manufacturing for states in Europe and North America.
Please help this is dueeee
Laissez-Faire had an impact on economics during the Industrial Revolution because many people thought it would accelerate economic development and enrich everyone, including industrialists and their employees.
How did laissez-faire policies aid economic growth in the late 1800s?Laissez-faire government policies encouraged the growth of American businesses since they did not place restrictions on them that would have impeded their output and profitability.
Free markets in trade (i.e., no price controls or intrusive government intervention); and a government that plays the role of the "night watchman," i.e., one that makes sure that contracts are upheld, conflicts are resolved peacefully, everybody's rights are upheld, and civilization is protected from scofflaws both domestically and abroad throughout its police and courts.
How is laissez-faire policy different from mercantilism?The laissez-faire philosophy holds that the free market should control commercial activities. To achieve a favorable trade balance under capitalism, government economic control is required.
Contrary to mercantilist policies, which were designed to benefit the government and the commercial class, the laissez-faire, or free markets, theories that Adam Smith popularized interpreted economic health in a much broader sense, encompassing the entire population.
How did laissez-faire improve the economy?Businesses in a free-market economy have more flexibility from governmental prohibitions that would make doing business more difficult. In such a setting, businesses are more inclined to take chances and invest in the economy.
The widespread adoption of 14 or 16-hour workdays, the absence of safety regulations, and poor wages were all caused by these types of policies. Businesses profited from the absence of government regulation of labor markets, which led to a rise in total production.
The introduction of laissez-faire principles benefited North America and Europe since there was a significant increase in demand and supplies as a result of a free market.
The free market is among the market types that are most suited for any region because there is little price disparity and the demand for the commodity becomes fully elastic.
Learn more about laissez-faire principles: https://brainly.com/question/16279411
#SPJ1
why americans choose herbert hoover for president
Hoover was a candidate for the Republican Party in the 1928 presidential election in the United States. He defeated Democratic contender Alfred E. Smith (1873–1944), the governor of New York.
What did Herbert Hoover accomplish for the USA?Hoover was named the head of the Food Administration by President Woodrow Wilson when the United States joined the conflict in 1917. As the "food czar" of his nation, he rose to fame. Following the war, Hoover oversaw the American Relief Administration, which fed the millions of people who were hungry in Central and Eastern Europe, particularly Russia. Hoover was chosen to lead the U.S. Food Administration in 1917, after the United States had joined the conflict. The endeavour to conserve resources and supplies and to feed America's European allies was led by Hoover since he was the best person for the job. Hoover gained notoriety; the term "to Hooverize" denoted food cost savings.
To know more about president visit:
brainly.com/question/29630246
#SPJ1
why seperation from britain will lead to greater economic and personal liberty through a free market economy
The reason why separation from Britain might lead to greater economic and personal liberty through a free market economy is because the country can make its own economic decisions.
How can separation from Britain help colonies ?Separation from Britain may lead to greater economic and personal liberty through a free market economy because it would allow a country to make its own economic decisions and policies without being constrained by the regulations and laws set by another country.
A free market economy is characterized by minimal government intervention, allowing for more competition and innovation, leading to potentially greater economic growth.
Additionally, breaking free from the constraints of a centralized government may also lead to greater personal liberty as individuals and businesses are able to make their own choices and decisions. This can lead to a more dynamic and diverse economy, where people can pursue their own interests and goals.
Find out more on separation from Britain at https://brainly.com/question/639443
#SPJ1
Poland in the 17th century was located primarily north of the Central Russian Upland. Based on the map above, what challenge did it face in the age of empires?
A. It lacked natural barriers at its borders.
B. It would have needed to import grain for food.
C.It lacked navigable rivers to move goods.
D. Heat and humidity would have made viral diseases a chronic issue.
Answer:
Letter (A) - It lacked natural barriers at its borders.
Explanation:
Based on the map above, the challenge that Poland in the 17th century faced in the age of empires was that it lacked natural barriers at its borders. This meant that the nation was more vulnerable to invasion and conquest by its neighbors, as it lacked physical barriers to protect its borders. Additionally, due to its location, Poland would have lacked navigable rivers to move goods and resources, which would have posed a further challenge in terms of its ability to trade with its neighbors.
Poland in the 17th century was located primarily north of the Central Russian Upland. It lacked natural barriers at its borders which was a challenge did it face in the age of empires. The correct option is A.
What is Poland's main resource?The natural resources in Poland are comparatively abundant. Despite the fact that brown coal is also mined, bituminous coal is the main mineral asset. The large Upper Silesian coalfield provides the majority of the bituminous output.
During the 17th century, Poland-Lithuania was a major power in Eastern Europe, but it faced many challenges in the age of empires. One of the primary challenges was its vulnerable geographical location. Poland-Lithuania was located on a vast plain that lacked natural barriers, making it vulnerable to invasion by neighboring powers.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about Poland here:
https://brainly.com/question/10585031
#SPJ2
What was the main way that business leaders helped the war effort during World War II?
Answer:
The main way that business leaders helped the war effort during World War II was by converting their factories and operations to manufacture war materials, equipment, and supplies.
Explanation:
This was critical to sustaining the war effort in terms of providing the necessary materials for soldiers to use in combat and for workers to replenish as needed. Business leaders provided jobs and necessary services to citizens, and also diverted their own resources to ensure necessary materials were made available quickly and efficiently. This allowed the war effort to continue on time and with greater efficiency, aiding in victory against the Axis powers.
1.) If you have live during the time of americans in the philippines,
How would
have responded in the policies they introduced to our country?
Answer:
The Philippines was a Spanish colony for over 300 years before it was ceded to the United States as part of the Treaty of Paris in 1898. The Americans then introduced a number of policies aimed at modernizing and "civilizing" the Philippines, including the establishment of a public education system, the construction of infrastructure such as roads and bridges, and the introduction of a new legal system.However, these policies were also accompanied by suppression of Philippine independence movements and the deaths of many Filipinos during the Philippine-American War.Many Filipinos opposed the American presence and policies, and there were numerous rebellions and resistance movements. Some collaborated with Americans, in the hopes of gaining benefits or in the belief that it was necessary for the Philippines to be under American tutelage before being ready for self-government.Overall, the American period in the Philippines was a complex and controversial time, with varying opinions among Filipinos.
Explanation:
The spinning wheel was developed in Great Britain about 1750. Most economists agree this marked the beginning of
Answer:
the industrial revolution in Britain. The invention of the spinning wheel allowed for the mass production of yarn and
textiles, which increased the productivity of the cotton industry and helped to create a new economic system in Britain.
This new system was based around the use of machines and factories to produce goods, as opposed to the traditional
methods of craftsmanship and small-scale production. This led to the creation of new job opportunities, the growth
of cities, and the rise of a new class of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs. The spinning wheel also helped to reduce
the cost of production, allowing more people to purchase higher quality textiles at a lower price. This increased
consumption, which in turn helped to stimulate economic growth and development.
Compare and contrast the historical views on gender in greece, egypt, rome and china?
Rome's culture did not view women as having the same legal standing as males as it did in ancient Egypt. They were under a man's rule and only received a basic education if any at all. This was traditionally their father before marriage.
Egyptian women were equal to Egyptian males, unlike the majority of other ancient societies. People's distinctions in legal and economic rights were caused by social class, not by variations in gender. A king's or important official's wife, mother, or daughter may exercise significant influence.
Compared to male citizens, women in the ancient Greek civilization had few rights. A woman's place was in the house and her role in life was to raise children because she was unable to vote, possess land, or inherit. Greek women had essentially no political rights of any kind and were subject to male authority almost their whole lives.
In china, Women were primarily limited to domestic labor such as weaving because they had no legal rights to the property other than those related to their dowries. The widespread practice of foot binding, which prohibited women from standing or walking, made this easier.
to learn more about gender equality:
brainly.com/question/24803290
What are the risk factors that contribute to the frequency of communicable illnesses that young children typically experience in the early learning environment?
Name two ways you would prepare families/caregivers to understand the issues surrounding communicable illnesses and how to prevent them.
The crowded environment in the schools and the unsanitary spaces that they come across are the risk factors that contribute to the frequency of communicable illnesses in young children.
The two ways would be through, teaching them about communicable diseases, and also ensuring that they are able to have the opportunity to see what these diseases could cause.
What is meant by communicable diseases?The term "communicable disease" refers to illnesses that develop as a result of the infection, presence, and proliferation of pathogenic (disease-causing) biologic agents in a specific human or other animal host. Communicable diseases are sometimes referred to as infectious diseases or transmissible diseases.
Communicable diseases are illnesses that may be passed from one person to another, from one animal to another, from a surface or food, or from one person to another. Through direct touch with a sick individual, diseases can be spread during plane travel. A sick person's coughing or sneezing might transmit respiratory droplets.
Read more on communicable diseases here: https://brainly.com/question/1268202
#SPJ1
Hitler did not attend the Wannsee Conference, although he had approved the Final Solution. If someone had asked him about his absence, which statement is CLOSEST to the answer he may have provided?
‘I already made the decisions; the conference was to inform the men of their duties.’
‘Since I was not there, I am not responsible for the decisions made at the Conference.’
‘I have entrusted the decisions to my cabinet members as I concentrate on the war effort.’
‘I wanted my men to feel free to express their ideas and opinions without fear of retribution.’
"I already made the decisions; the conference was to inform the men of their duties."
This statement is the closest to an answer that Hitler may have provided as it suggests that he had already approved the Final Solution and that the Wannsee Conference was simply an opportunity for his cabinet members to be informed of their roles and responsibilities in carrying it out. This statement also implies that Hitler did not feel the need to be present at the conference as the decisions had already been made.
please help!! i have a debate in my class anti federalists vs federalists. i’m supposed to debunk one of their arguments and it is “americans won’t be able to vote for their president and will have no voting rights”, what fact can i use to argue that as a federalist?
Answer:
As a federalist, you can argue that the U.S. Constitution specifically states that the president is elected by the Electoral College, not by popular vote. Therefore, Americans still have voting rights, as they are able to vote for their representatives in the Electoral College. This ensures that all citizens have a say in the election of the president, regardless of their state's population.
Explanation:
How did public high schools play a role in preparing students for the future?
Answer:*Began offering a broad range of
courses such as vocational training for
those interested in industrial jobs
*Widespread education increased
literacy in America
Explanation:
Use the chart below to answer the question that follows:
Europe and Africa to Americas Americas and Europe to Africa
Plants coffee, sugar cane, bananas, melons, olives, barley, wheat, oats, rice, ragweed, bluegrass, dandelions, daisies, clover maize (corn), potatoes, sweet potatoes, peanuts, squash, pumpkins, tomatoes, peppers, papaya, guava, avocado, pineapple, manioc, cacao, chicle, tobacco
Animals cattle, chickens, horses, goats, sheep, pigs llamas, alpacas, turkeys, guinea pigs
Humans African slaves, European merchants, officials, priests, and settlers few
Diseases smallpox, yellow fever, malaria, measles, chicken pox, influenza, common cold syphilis
The chart above supports the idea that
Europeans brought livestock to support a permanent move to the Americas
Native Americans successfully colonized the Old World
the population of the New World was much higher than that of European countries
pre-Columbian civilizations had not successfully domesticated any animals for food
Answer:
The chart above supports the idea that Europeans brought livestock such as cattle, chickens, horses, goats, sheep, and pigs to the Americas, while the Americas sent plants such as maize, potatoes, sweet potatoes, peanuts, and various fruits, as well as animals like llamas, alpacas, turkeys, and guinea pigs to Europe. It also suggests that the transatlantic slave trade brought many African slaves to the Americas, and European merchants, officials, priests, and settlers also made the journey. Additionally, it shows that diseases such as smallpox, yellow fever, malaria, measles, chicken pox, influenza, and the common cold were introduced to the Americas by Europeans, while syphilis was brought from the Americas to Europe.
Answer: Europeans brought livestock to support a permanent move to the Americas.
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right
what are the characteristics of authoritarianism? of totalitarianism? of despotism?
Answer:
Authoritarianism, totalitarianism, and despotism are all forms of government that have certain characteristics in common, but they are also distinct in some ways.
Characteristics of authoritarianism:
Limited political freedom and civil liberties
Strong centralized power and control over the government and society
A single leader or small group of leaders hold significant power
Limited or no participation in political decision-making
Repression of political opposition and control of the media
Characteristics of totalitarianism:
Total control over all aspects of society, including the economy, education, and culture
A single leader or small group of leaders hold absolute power
Limited or no political freedoms and civil liberties
Use of propaganda and control of the media to shape public opinion
Repression of political opposition and use of secret police to maintain control
A strong sense of nationalism and a cult of personality around the leader
Characteristics of despotism:
Absolute power is held by a single ruler
Limited or no political freedoms and civil liberties
No or limited participation in political decision-making
Repression of political opposition and control of the media
No or limited accountability for the ruler's actions
No or limited rule of law and arbitrary decision-making
It's worth noting that these forms of government can overlap and share characteristics with each other, but there are still clear distinctions between them.
Which diagram correctly matches the military leader with his actions during the early years of the Civil War?
The diagram that correctly matches the military leader with his actions during the early years of the Civil War is B George McClellan Led the failed union invasion of Virginia.
There were numerous reasons why Union General George McClellan failed to capture Virginia during the American Civil War. One of the primary reasons was his wary and slow way to deal with the mission. McClellan was well-known for his meticulous planning and focus on the small things, which frequently led to delays and missed opportunities.
His lack of cooperation with other Union generals was another factor in his failure to capture Virginia. McClellan was known for being difficult to work with as a leader, and he frequently ignored the guidance and instructions of his superiors, including President Abraham Lincoln.
To learn more about George McClellan at
https://brainly.com/question/10547394
#SPJ1
Answer: It's A
Explanation: Just took the question
Compare and contrast the different Native American tribes Anasazi AlgonKian Iroquois
Answer:
Explanation:
The Anasazi, Algonkian, and Iroquois are all Native American tribes that have been around for centuries. Each tribe has its own unique culture and traditions.
The Anasazi tribe was a group of Native Americans who lived in the present-day Four Corners area of the United States which includes parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, and Arizona. The Anasazi lived in an area that was largely desert and had to rely on the environment to survive. They were also known for their extensive trading network and their skill in pottery and basket weaving.
The Algonkian tribe is a group of Native Americans who lived throughout the eastern woodlands in the present-day United States and Canada. They lived in small villages and were known for their hunting and fishing skills. They were also known for their use of canoes and dugout boats, and for their ability to grow corn and other crops.
The Iroquois are a Native American tribe that originally lived in the present-day state of New York. They were known for their highly organized government which included a council of chiefs and a constitution. They were also known for their agricultural skills and for their use of longhouses.
Overall, these three Native American tribes all have unique cultures and traditions. The Anasazi were known for their trading network and pottery and basket weaving skills. The Algonkian were known for their hunting and fishing skills as well as their use of canoes and dugout boats. The Iroquois were known for their highly organized government and their agricultural skills.
In what way does the United Nations differ from the League of Nations?
The UN always intervenes when there are problems.
The UN conducts conferences concerning health issues.
The UN has a mandate to protect human rights.
The UN maintains its own military troops.
Answer: A
Explanation:The UN has a mandate to protect human rights the United Nations differ from the League of Nations. Option (a) is correct.
What do you mean by Conferences?
A conference is typically thought of as a gathering of multiple people to talk about a specific subject.
When it was established in 1945, the United Nations (UN) took on some of the League of Nations' more significant issues. For instance, the UN is able to send out a military force. It also decides on economic and human rights policy in addition to peacekeeping activities. 51 countries once made up the membership.
Therefore, Option (a) is correct. The UN has a mandate to protect human rights the United Nations differ from the League of Nations.
Learn more about Conferences, here;
brainly.com/question/9753882
