bill is trying to sell his house in oklahoma city, oklahoma to george, who lives in little rock, arkansas. they have a dispute over the terms of the contract, and bill decides to sue george. which of the following statements is true in this scenario? A) The Arkansas state court has in rem jurisdiction to hear this case.
B) The Oklahoma state court does not have jurisdiction to hear this case as the defendant is from another state.
C)The Oklahoma state court has in rem jurisdiction to hear this case.
D)The Arkansas court will hear this case as it has in personam jurisdiction over George.

Option c is Correct. George, who resides in Little Rock, Arkansas, is the buyer for Bill's home in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. They disagree on the contract's provisions, so Bill decides to sue George.

The following conditions must be met in order for the Oklahoma state court to have in rem jurisdiction over this matter. The majority opinion, which wins a majority vote from the justices or judges hearing the case, is an appellate opinion supporting the court's judgment (the outcome reached in the case).

A judicial judgment is considered to be a "majority opinion" if more than half of the judges who are reviewing the case concur. An appellate judge who sided with the majority would express their unique legal position in a "concurring opinion," also known as concurrence.

Learn more about Oklahoma Visit: brainly.com/question/25377599

#SPJ4

which statement provides evidence that congress is fulfillung its responsibilities as the legislative branch of government