Subject: Oral Health
A patient has two bony (cyst-like) lumps right behind each of her last molars, (as circled & shown in picture)
*these lumps are parallel to each other, like the pic shows*
The patient has had no problems with them, they are painless, however, over the past few years they have grown a bit in size.
The patient thought that these lumps were her wisdom teeth, so had no worries, til she had her wisdom teeth removed, and they were still there.
Any possible diagnosis for this?
Side note: The patient does have hay fever/moderate to medium outdoor allergies, *A possible cause??
Without carrying out a form of a physical examination and getting more information about the patient's medical and dental history, but it can be:
Torus mandibularisMandibular cystsWhat is the patient problemPossible causes include torus mandibularis, a benign growth on the inside of the lower jaw. Tori are often symmetrical and can result from genetics, stress, or teeth grinding. They're typically painless and don't require treatment unless they interfere with dental care or cause discomfort.
Mandibular cysts are sacs filled with fluid that can develop in the jaw due to infections, trauma, or abnormalities, and may grow over time. Treatment for cysts may include monitoring, antibiotics, or surgery. Salivary gland enlargement may occur due to infections, blockages, or other factors.
Learn more about patient from
https://brainly.com/question/24969171
#SPJ1
True or false the intent of a do query is to accomplish a goal
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A "do" query is often used in computer programming to carry out an action or achieve a particular objective. The objective may change based on the situation in which the "do" query is used, but it is often intended to produce some sort of result or outcome. A "do" query might be used, for instance, to carry out a database operation, carry out a calculation, or start a system job.
What role should the United States have in international peace keeping?
I need the essay to be in between 300 - 550 words.
Answer:
International peacekeeping has become an important issue for the United States, as it is the world's leading superpower with significant influence over global security. The U.S. has a responsibility to ensure that peace is maintained worldwide, and this responsibility includes participating in peacekeeping missions. However, there is much debate over what role the United States should play in international peacekeeping.
Some argue that the U.S. should lead peacekeeping efforts around the world, while others believe that the U.S. should take a more passive role and only participate in peacekeeping when necessary. Supporters of a strong U.S. leadership role argue that the U.S. has the resources and military might to intervene and prevent conflicts from escalating. They believe that the U.S. should use its power to protect human rights and promote democracy worldwide, which will ultimately contribute to global stability.
On the other hand, opponents of a strong U.S. leadership role argue that the U.S. should not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. They believe that the U.S. should take a more isolationist approach and avoid getting involved in foreign conflicts. They argue that the U.S. should focus on its own domestic issues and leave other countries to resolve their own conflicts.
Despite these differing viewpoints, it is clear that the United States has an important role to play in international peacekeeping. As a leading superpower, the U.S. has a unique responsibility to promote global security and stability. The U.S. has already played a significant role in peacekeeping missions in various regions around the world, such as the Middle East and Africa.
However, it is important for the U.S. to approach peacekeeping with caution and carefully consider the potential consequences of intervention. The U.S. should only participate in peacekeeping missions when there is a clear and compelling reason to do so, and should always work with other countries and international organizations to ensure that peacekeeping efforts are effective.
In addition, the U.S. should prioritize diplomacy and conflict prevention over military intervention. The U.S. should work to address the root causes of conflicts, such as poverty and inequality, and promote dialogue and cooperation among nations. By focusing on diplomacy and prevention, the U.S. can help to prevent conflicts from escalating and reduce the need for military intervention.
In conclusion, the United States has an important role to play in international peacekeeping. However, this role should be approached with caution and consideration for the potential consequences of intervention. By prioritizing diplomacy and prevention, the U.S. can help to promote global security and stability in a responsible and effective manner.