Which of the following real-world problems can be modeled with the inequality 384+2x<6x? Marta charges a flat fee of $384 plus $2 per linear foot to decorate tables for a quinceanera. Carla charges $6 per linear foot to do the same. For what number of linear feet, x, will the cost of both decorators be the same? Shawna has made 384 campaign buttons for the student council election. She plans to make 2 more buttons each hour. Marguerite plans to make 6 campaign buttons per hour. For what number of hours, x, will Shawna have the same amount of campaign buttons as Marguerite? Super Clean house cleaning company charges $384 to power wash a house plus $2 per linear foot. Power Bright charges $6 per linear foot and no flat fee. For what number of linear feet, x, will the cost of Super Clean be more expensive than Power Bright? Mega Gym charges a $384 registration fee and $2 each time the gym is used. Super Gym charges a fee of $6 every time the gym is used. What number of times, x, will Super Gym need to be used to exceed the cost of Mega Gym?

Answer:

The percentage would be 20% (5x20=100)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes, it would be unusual.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal probability distribution

Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

If [tex]Z \leq -2[/tex] or [tex]Z \geq 2[/tex], the outcome X is considered unusual.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 22, \sigma = 5, n = 25, s = \frac{5}{\sqrt{25}} = 1[/tex]

Would it be unusual for this sample mean to be less than 19 days?

We have to find Z when X = 19. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{19 - 22}{1}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -3[/tex]

[tex]Z = -3 \leq -2[/tex], so yes, the sample mean being less than 19 days would be considered an unusual outcome.

Complete Question

A box is formed by cutting squares from the four corners of a sheet of paper and folding up the sides. However, the size of the paper is unknown!

Answer:

(a)[tex]f(0.2)=0.2(l-0.4)(w-0.4)[/tex]

(b)[tex]f(1.3)=1.3(l-2.6)(w-2.6)[/tex]

(c)f(1.3)-f(0.2)

(d) f(5.6)-f(5.5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the Length of the paper =l  (in inches)

Let the Width of the paper =w  (in inches)

Let the length of the cutout square = x (in inches)

Volume of the box: [tex]f(x)=x(l-2x)(w-2x)[/tex]

(a)When the cutout length is 0.2 inches.

x=0.2

Volume of the box (in cubic inches) ,

[tex]f(0.2)=0.2(l-0.4)(w-0.4)[/tex]

(b)When the cutout length is 01.3 inches.

x=1.3

Volume of the box (in cubic inches) ,

[tex]f(1.3)=1.3(l-2.6)(w-2.6)[/tex]

(c)If the cutout length increases from 0.2 inches to 1.3 inches.

Change In volume (in cubic inches):

[tex]f(1.3)-f(0.2)\\=1.3(l-2.6)(w-2.6)-0.2(l-0.4)(w-0.4)[/tex]

(d)If the cutout length increases from 5.5 inches to 5.6 inches.

Change In volume (in cubic inches):

[tex]f(5.6)-f(5.5)\\=5.6(l-11.2)(w-11.2)-5.5(l-11)(w-11)[/tex]

Answer:

4.700

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the number in the thousandth place  0  and look one place to the right for the rounding digit 4. Round up if this number is greater than or equal to 5 and round down if it is less than 5.

brainliesssss plssssssssssssss

Answer:

(71.28, 78.72)

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following information from the statement:

mean (m) = 75

sample standard deviation (sd) = 5

Sample size (n) = 13

Significance level (alpha) = 1 - 0.98 = 0.02

Degrees of freedom for t-d (df) = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12

The critical value would be:

t (alpha / 2) / df = T (0.01) / 12 = 2,681 (this for the table)

Margin of error equals:

E = t (alpha / 2) / df * sd / n ^ (1/2), replacing:

E = 2,681 * 5/13 ^ (1/2)

E = 3.72

Therefore, the interval of 98% confidence interval would be:

75 + 3.72 = 78.72

75 - 3.72 = 71.28

(71.28, 78.72)

Answer:

m > 82.28

Step-by-step explanation:

Price to Pay (P)

distance (m)

Company A

Pa = 0.80m

Company B

Pb = 65 + 0.01m

Company A charge more than B is written like this

0.8m > 65 + 0.01m

then we can solve this inequality

(0.8 - 0.01)m > 65

0.79m > 65

m > 65/0.79

m > 82.28 miles

so if Maya will go more than 82.28 miles, I suggest Company B is cheaper

Answer:

Options A, B and E are correct

Step-by-step explanation:

From the information given above, we would draw a dilation that produces an image that is the same shape as the original image, but has a different size.

The scale factor is 2

QRS → Q'R'S' = (x,y) → 2(x,y)

The coordinates of ∆QRS

Q (-3, 3)

R (2, 4)

S (-1, 1)

To get the coordinates of Q'R'S', we would multiply each coordinate of the original triangle by the scale factor of 2 since the dilation is from the origin. In order words, each vertex of QRS is multiplied by 2 to get each of the vertex of Q'R'S'.

2 (x,y) = (2x, 2y)

The coordinates of ∆Q'R'S' becomes:

Q' (-6, 6)

R' (4, 8)

S' (-2, 2)

To determine the statements that are true about the image ΔQ'R'S,

we would graph the coordinates of the two triangles.

Starting with ΔABC, we would draw the dilation image of the triangle with a center at the origin and a scale factor of 2.

See attached the diagram for better explanation.

Let's check out each options and compare it with diagram we obtained:

a) DO, 2 (x,y) = (2x, 2y)

A dilation about the origin with a scale factor 2 is described using the above notation.

Q' = 2(-3,3) = [2(-3), 2(3)] = (-6, 6)

R' (4, 8) = 2(2,4) = [2(2), 2(4)] = (4, 8)

S' (-2, 2) = 2(-1,1) = [2(-1), 2(1)] = (-2, 2)

This option is correct

b) Side Q'S' lies on a line with a slope of -1

Q' (-6, 6)

S' (-2, 2)

coordinate (x, y)

Slope = m = (change in y)/(change in x)

m = (6-2)/[-6-(-2)]

= 4/(-6+2) = 4/-4

m = -1

This option is correct

c) QR is longer than Q'R'

Length of QR (-3 to 2) = 5

Length of Q'R' (-6 to 4) = 10

QR is not longer than Q'R'

This option is false

d) The vertices of the image are closer to the origin than those of the pre-image

The scale factor determines how much bigger or smaller the dilation image will be compared to the preimage. In a transformation, the final figure is referred to as the image. The original figure is referred to as the preimage.

From the diagram, the vertices of the preimage (original image) are closer to the origin than those of the dilation image.

This option is false

e) The distance from Q' to the origin is twice the distance from Q to the origin.

The distance from Q' to the origin (6 to 0) = 6

The distance from Q to the origin (3 to 0) = 3

The distance from Q' to the origin = 2(the distance from Q to the origin)

This option is correct

Answer:

A,B and E is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

f(-4) = -8-5(-4) = -8+20 = 12

Answer:

f(-4) = 12

Step-by-step explanation:

f(-4) = -8 - 5(-4)

= -8 + 20

= 12

Answer:

the answer is square root 5 over 2 square root 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

This question is based on the " Partition Postulate. " You might be familiar with it, it states that a whole is composed of several parts. In this case you could say that this " whole " is ∠ ABC, and the " parts " are ∠1 and ∠2. By this Theorem you could also state the following;

[tex]m< ABC = m< 1 + m< 2,\\\\Substitute,\\110 = 4x + ( 5x + 10 ),\\110 = 4x + 5x + 10,\\4x + 5x + 10 = 110 - Option D\\\\Solution - Option D[/tex]

Hope that helps!

Answer:

1651

Step-by-step explanation:

let s say that the price before the increase is x

to apply an increase of 9% it does x + x*0.09 = x*(1+0.09)=x*1.09

and we know that this value is 1800

so

x*1.09=1800

<=>

x = 1800/1.09=1651.376147

to the nearest penny it gives 1651

Answer:

Hello!

Answer: 1651

I hope that was correct.  Please let me know, thank you!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

108

Step-by-step explanation:

9 times 12 is 108

Answer:

10 players

Step-by-step explanation:

If you count the x’s, there are 10.

Why ask this question? You could have just counted

Answer:

22 players

Step-by-step explanation:

It specifically says 'at least 3 runs' so you would have to count all the x's in the columns 3, 4, and 5.

There are 10 x's in the 3 column

There are 3 x's in the 4 column

There are 9 x's in the 5 column

Hope this helps!

Answer:

A. Observational study

Step-by-step explanation:

In research, an observational study is a type of study in which the researcher observes a phenomenon and tries to establish some relationship between the different variables he/she is observing. In other words, the researcher only observes and doesn't give a treatment.

On the other hand, when we have a experiment, we usually have 2 different groups (one that will receive a treatment and one who won't) and the researcher compares the differences between these two groups because of the treatment. In other words, the researcher does something other than just observing.

In this example, the research is going to determine if there is a relation between hearing loss and exposure to mumps. In this example the researcher is only going to observe how people who have been exposed to mumps are regarding hearing loss (we can say this since it will be unethical for example for the researcher to create an experiment in which he/she exposes a group to mumps). Therefore, he is going to observe how the past exposure to mumps could be related with the hearing loss.

Thus, this is an observational study.

Answer:

3a) 30% more than original price

b) 70% of the original price

c) 17times the original price

d) 70% less than original price

e) t + 0.85t

f) t - 0.15t

g) t - 0.85t

h) t + 0.15t

4. The expression that can be used to find the amount of money in his bank = m + 0.25m

Question:

3. Match each statement with an expression that could be used to find the price.

'The expressions for a to d were not stated in the question'.

a) p+ 0.3p

b) 0.7p

c) 17p

d) p-07p

'From e to h, we were not told what to determine'.

Write the expression in terms of time

e. 85% more than the original time

f. 15% less time than the original

g. 85% time decrease

h. 15% time increase

4. Ronnie increased the amount of money in his piggy bank by 25%. Which expression can be used to find the amount of money in his bank? Let "m" represent the original​.

Step-by-step explanation:

let original price = p

a) p+ 0.3p = p + 30% of p

30% more than original price

b) 0.7p = 70% of p

= 70% of the original price

c) 17p = 17 × p

= 17times of the original price

d) p-0.7p = p - 70% of p

= 70% less than original price

Let original time = t

e) 85% more than the original time = t + 85%of t

= t + 0.85t

f) 15% less time than the original time = t - 15% of t

= t - 0.15t

g) 85% time decrease = t - 85% of t

= t - 0.85t

h) 15% time increase = t + 15% of t

= t + 0.15t

4. Since "m" represent the original amount in Hus piggy bank

An increase of 25% = original amount + 25% of original amount

= m + 25% of m

'Of' means multiplication

= m + 0.25 ×m

= m + 0.25m

= 1.25m

The expression that can be used to find the amount of money in his bank = m + 0.25m

Answer:

(-5, 38) and

(5,18)

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]x^2-2x+3=-2x+28\\<=> x^2-2x+3+2x=28\\<=> x^2 = 28-3=25\\<=> x^2-25=0\\<=> x^2-5^2 =0\\<=> (x-5)(x+5)=0\\<=> x = 5 \ or \ x=-5[/tex]

so the solutions are

(-5, 38) and

(5,18)

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

In a suit of 52 cards

The experiment consists of drawing 1 card from the standard deck.

Since diamonds are red, there is no black jack of diamonds.

Therefore:

P(drawing a black jack of diamonds)

[tex]=\dfrac{0}{52}\\\\ =0[/tex]

Answers:

In photo below

Explanation:

I got it correct in my test :)

Answer:

( 5 ^ -2)^4

= 5 ^ -8

= 1 /5^8

= 1 / 390,625

Answer:

The average would be 42 / 28 = $1.50 / day.

Answer:

$1.50 per day

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the dollar amount and divide by the number of days

42 dollars / 28 days

1.50 dollars per day

$1.50 per day

Answer:

a) P(X < 30) = 0.0392.

b) P(28 < X < 32) = 0.2760

c) P(X > 35) = 0.1190

d) P(X > 31) = 0.8810

e) At least 35.7965 mpg

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 33, \sigma = 1.7[/tex]

a. P(X<30)

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 30. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{30 - 33}{1.7}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.76[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.76[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0392.

Then

P(X < 30) = 0.0392.

b) P(28 < X < 32)

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 32 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 28. So

X = 32

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{32 - 33}{1.7}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.59[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.59[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.2776.

X = 28

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{28 - 33}{1.7}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.94[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.94[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0016.

0.2776 - 0.0016 = 0.2760.

So

P(28 < X < 32) = 0.2760

c) P(X>35)

This is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 35. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{35 - 33}{1.7}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.18[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.18[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.8810.

1 - 0.8810 = 0.1190

So

P(X > 35) = 0.1190

d. P(X>31)

This is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 31. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{31 - 33}{1.7}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.18[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.18[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.1190.

1 - 0.1190 = 0.8810

So

P(X > 31) = 0.8810

e. the mileage rating that the upper 5% of cars achieve.

At least the 95th percentile.

The 95th percentile is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.95. So it is X when Z = 1.645. Then

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]1.645 = \frac{X - 33}{1.7}[/tex]

[tex]X - 33 = 1.645*1.7[/tex]

[tex]X = 35.7965[/tex]

At least 35.7965 mpg

The upper 5% of cars have a mileage rating of 35.805 mpg

Z score is used to determine by how many standard deviations the raw score is above or below the mean. It is given by:

z = (raw score - mean) / standard deviation

Given;  mean of 33 mpg and a standard deviation of 1.7

a) For < 30:

z = (30 - 33)/1.7 = -1.76

P(x < 30) = P(z < -1.76) = 1 - 0.8413 = 0.0392

b) For < 28:

z = (28 - 33)/1.7 = -2.94

P(x < 28) = P(z < -2.94) = 0.0016

c) For > 35:

z = (35 - 33)/1.7 = 1.18

P(x > 35) = P(z > 1.18) = 1 - P(z < 1.18) = 1 - 0.8810 = 0.119

d) For > 31:

z = (31 - 33)/1.7 = -1.18

P(x > 31) = P(z > -1.18) = 1 - P(z < -1.18) = 0.8810

e) The  upper 5% of cars achieve have a z score of 1.65, hence:

1.65 = (x - 33)/1.7

x = 35.805 mpg

The upper 5% of cars have a mileage rating of 35.805 mpg

Find out more on z score at: https://brainly.com/question/25638875

Answer:

y= 2x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

Points:

Form of the line:

Finding the slope:

Line is now:

Using one of the given points to find out the value of b:

So the equation for the line is:

Answer:

(x-2)(x-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

You should be trying to find two numbers that add to make the coefficient of x (in this case, -4), and two numbers that multiply to make the constant term (in this case, +4). The two numbers that work for both of those criteria are -2 and -2.

-2 x -2 = +4 (satisfies the constant term)

-2 + -2 = -4 (satisfies the coefficient of x)

Answer:

slope = 3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

3x-2y=6

Get this equation in the form y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

Subtract 3x from each side

3x-3x-2y=-3x+6

-2y = -3x+6

Divide each side by -2

-2y/-2 = -3x/-2 +6/-2

y = 3/2x -3

The slope is 3/2 and the y intercept is -3

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

I got this answer by putting it in the form y=mx+b

Step 1: Subtract 3x from each side

-2y = -3x+6

Step 2: Divide each side by -2

y = 3/2x -3

The slope is 3/2 and the y intercept is -3 because m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

Answer:

–2(5 – 4x) < 6x – 4

<=>

-10 + 8x < 6x - 4

<=>

2x < 6

<=>

x < 3

Hope this helps!

:)

Answer:

Step 1: –10 + 8x < 6x – 4

Step 2: –10 < –2x – 4

Step 3: –6 < –2x

Step 4: ________

What is the final step in solving the inequality –2(5 – 4x) < 6x – 4?

A. x < –3  

B. x > –3

C. x < 3

D. x > 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer here is C. x < 3

Step-by-step explanation:

-8x + 4 > 5 - 3x

-8x + 3x > 5 - 4

-5x > 1

x > 1 / - 5

Answer:

[tex] P(X\leq x) =\frac{x-a}{b-a}, a \leq x \leq b[/tex]

And using this formula we have this:

[tex] P(X<11) = \frac{11-0}{12-0}= 0.917[/tex]

Then we can conclude that the probability that that a person waits fewer than 11 minutes is approximately 0.917

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X the random variable of interest that a woman must wait for a cab"the amount of time in minutes " and we know that the distribution for this random variable is given by:

[tex] X \sim Unif (a=0, b =12)[/tex]

And we want to find the following probability:

[tex] P(X<11)[/tex]

And for this case we can use the cumulative distribution function given by:

[tex] P(X\leq x) =\frac{x-a}{b-a}, a \leq x \leq b[/tex]

And using this formula we have this:

[tex] P(X<11) = \frac{11-0}{12-0}= 0.917[/tex]

Then we can conclude that the probability that that a person waits fewer than 11 minutes is approximately 0.917

Answer:

The correct answer would be D) 4.8x + 1.2 = 3.6; x = 0.5 mile

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because laps would be the dependent variable, so we know the number of them (4.8) would be multiplied by the variable (x). We also know that 1.2 is the constant. Now we can solve to make sure this is the right equation.

4.8x + 1.2 = 3.6

4.8x = 2.4

x = 0.5

Answer:

D) 4.8x + 1.2 = 3.6; x = 0.5 miles

Answer:

  D  0.00009

Step-by-step explanation:

9 × 10^-5 = 9 × 1/10^5 = 9 × 1/100,000

  = 9 × 0.00001

  = 0.00009

_____

Comment on place value

The exponent of 10 associated with the place value in a decimal number increases from 0 to the left of the decimal point, and decreases from -1 to the right of the decimal point:

  100. = 10²

  10. = 10¹

  1. = 10⁰

  0.1 = 10⁻¹

  0.01 = 10⁻²

  0.001 = 10⁻³

  0.0001 = 10⁻⁴

  0.00001 = 10⁻⁵

This simple realization can help you immensely with scientific notation.

Answer:

Below.

Step-by-step explanation:

18. Since A is congruent to B, you can conclude that B is congruent to A by the Reflexive Property of Congruence.

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of annual and quarterly mortality rates per 100,000 population is shown below:-

Quarterly mortality rates are

[tex]= \frac{Deaths}{Population\ in\ the\ city}\times Population[/tex]

For the first quarter

[tex]= \frac{54}{450,000}\times 100,000[/tex]

= 12  death per 100,000 population

For the second quarter

[tex]= \frac{43}{450,000}\times 100,000[/tex]

= 9.5  death per 100,000 population

For the third quarter

[tex]= \frac{35}{450,000}\times 100,000[/tex]

= 7.7  death per 100,000 population

For the fourth quarter

[tex]= \frac{39}{450,000}\times 100,000[/tex]

= 8.6  death per 100,000 population

Now the annual mortality is

[tex]= \frac{Deaths}{Population\ in\ the\ city}\times Population[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{171}{450,000}\times 100,000[/tex]

= 38 death per 100,000 population