The Microsoft and Amazon are the two commercial products that donate to nonprofit organization.
What is non-profit organization?The non- profit organizations are those organizations that has main motive of social welfare rather than the profit making. For example- giving education to poor people, constructing hospitals.
The commercial organizations which are running businesses for profit motive donate some part of their profit as a charity to these non-profit organizations.
The main source of revenue for these organizations so that the can do social work is the big commercial businesses.
Learn more about non- profit organizations here:
https://brainly.com/question/29795918
#SPJ1
1.Relate, in detail, the plot and symbolism of the Epic of Gilgamesh based on the sources we have read, and analyze what this epic tells us about the general outlook on life and death and Mesopotamia.
2.Discuss the Code of Hammurabi, including the principles upon which it was based. Give specific examples of laws in the Code, explain how they were applied to society, and analyze whether the Code fulfills the purpose stated in its prologue: to ensure right and justice in the land.
Answer:
The Epic of Gilgamesh is an ancient Mesopotamian epic poem that tells the story of Gilgamesh, a legendary king of Uruk. The main plot revolves around Gilgamesh's quest for immortality and his ultimate realization that death is inevitable. Along his journey, Gilgamesh meets a variety of characters, including his best friend Enkidu, the goddess Ishtar, and the wise Utnapishtim. Throughout the epic, there are numerous symbols that represent different aspects of life, death, and the human condition. For example, the Cedar Forest symbolizes the power of nature and the fragility of human life. The Bull of Heaven symbolizes the power of the gods and the futility of challenging them. The Flood symbolizes the destruction of the old world and the birth of a new one.
The Epic of Gilgamesh reveals a general outlook on life and death that is based on the idea of accepting mortality and embracing the present moment. Gilgamesh's quest for immortality is ultimately unsuccessful, and he learns to accept death as a natural part of life. The epic also reveals a sense of reverence for the gods and a belief in the power of nature. This outlook reflects the beliefs of the ancient Mesopotamians, who viewed the gods as powerful and nature as unpredictable and dangerous.
The Code of Hammurabi is an ancient Babylonian code of law that was created by King Hammurabi in the 18th century BCE. The code is based on the principles of justice and fairness, and it seeks to ensure that all members of society are treated equally and fairly. The code contains a variety of laws, ranging from criminal law to civil law and from family law to labor law. For example, the code contains laws regarding theft, murder, adultery, divorce, and contracts. It also contains laws that provide protection for the weak and vulnerable members of society, such as orphans and widows.
The Code of Hammurabi seeks to ensure right and justice in the land, and it does so by establishing a set of laws and punishments that are applied fairly and equally to all members of society. The code provides protection for the weak and vulnerable, and it seeks to ensure that all members of society are treated fairly and justly. The code also seeks to ensure that justice is served and that those who break the law are held accountable for their actions. Overall, the Code of Hammurabi fulfills the purpose stated in its prologue: to ensure right and justice in the land.
Explanation:
In at least one paragraph discuss the concept of triangular trade and how this relates to the Atlantic Slave Trade. Be sure to discuss in detail each leg of the journey.
Explanation:
Triangular trade refers to the historical trade pattern that existed between Europe, Africa, and the Americas during the colonial period. The trade route was called triangular because it involved a three-legged journey, with ships sailing from Europe to Africa, then to the Americas, and finally back to Europe. Each leg of the journey had a specific trade commodity.
The first leg of the journey, from Europe to Africa, involved the trade of manufactured goods such as textiles, guns, and rum. European traders would exchange these goods for enslaved Africans who were captured by African traders. The second leg of the journey, from Africa to the Americas, involved the transport of enslaved Africans to the American colonies where they were sold as labor for the growing plantation economy. This was the most brutal part of the journey and many enslaved Africans died due to the harsh conditions on the ships.
The final leg of the journey, from the Americas back to Europe, involved the trade of raw materials such as sugar, tobacco, and cotton. These goods were produced by the enslaved Africans on the plantations and were then sold to European traders for profit. The triangular trade route was a major contributor to the growth of the Atlantic slave trade, which forcibly brought millions of enslaved Africans to the Americas. This trade had a profound impact on the economies of Europe, Africa, and the Americas and its legacy can still be felt today
The Communist Manifesto was initially
published in each of the following
languages EXCEPT which one?
A. French
C. German
B. English
D. Spanish
Answer:
B. English
Explanation:
The Communist Manifesto was initially published in German language in 1848, not in English.
As you read about the Constitution, decide whether each of these
Many of the statements you've provided are true, but some are not. Below is a breakdown of the accuracy of each statement:
True: Larger states have more senators than smaller states. This is a reference to the principle of equal representation in the Senate, as outlined in the Constitution.False: The House of Representatives can bring charges of misbehavior against officials in other branches of government, including the president. This is incorrect. It is the House of Representatives that can bring articles of impeachment against the President, Vice President, and other civil officers of the United States.True: A bill may be introduced in either the House or the Senate, but it must be approved by a majority vote in both houses. This is a key step in the legislative process, known as the bicameral system.True: If the president vetoes a bill, it cannot become law. The President has the power to veto a bill, which means they can reject it.True: Bills for raising money (such as taxes) must begin in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose changes to the bill. This is known as the Origination Clause.True: The elastic clause gives Congress the power to do what is "necessary and proper" to carry out its other powers, leaving room for changes in the future. This clause is also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause.False: The government can take away a citizen's right to a fair trial. The Constitution guarantees citizens the right to a fair trial and due process under the law.False: States can make treaties or declare war. Only the federal government has the power to make treaties and declare war, as outlined in the Constitution.True: In the Electoral College system, the candidate who gets the most votes in a state generally gets all the electoral votes of that state.True: The Constitution specifies what should happen if a president dies or is removed from office. This is done through the process of Presidential succession.False: Either the president or Congress can declare war. The Constitution grants the power to declare war to Congress, not the President.True: The Senate appoints ambassadors, justices of the Supreme Court, and cabinet members.True: The "State of the Union address" includes the president's plans and policies for the year. This is a speech given annually by the President to a joint session of Congress.True: The Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, but leaves the rest of the federal courts to be set up by Congress.True: States have their own court systems that deal with state laws.False: If a person is charged with a crime and flees to a different state, he or she doesn't have to face criminal charges. The US Constitution has an Extradition Clause which allows states to request the return of a person charged with a crime in another state.True: Citizens have the same rights and privileges of citizenship no matter which state they live in.False: New states can be formed within any existing state without that state's approval. The Constitution provides a specific process for the admission of new states into the Union, which requires the approval of both Congress and the existing state(s).True: It takes fewer votes to ratify, or officially approve, an amendment to the Constitution than it does to propose an amendment. This is because the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to propose an amendment, but only a three-fourths vote of the states to ratify an amendment.False: If a state law is in conflict with a national law, the national law may be ignored. NationalFalse. If a state law is in conflict with a national law, the national law takes precedence under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.True. The Bill of Rights guarantees individuals' freedom of religion, speech, and assembly.False. Citizens cannot be punished for expressing their opinions about the government, as long as they do not incite violence or engage in other illegal activities.True. False.True, under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, citizens have the right to refuse to incriminate themselves.What is the constitution?The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. It was written in 1787 and has since been amended 27 times. It outlines the national frame of government, specifying the powers and duties of the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Therefore, the Constitution has a central place in American law and political culture. The signing of the Constitution took place on September 17, 1787, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and is now celebrated as Constitution Day and Citizenship Day in the United States.
Learn more about Constitution from
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
1.
What do the characters Ibarra and Elías
represent
in the novel?
Why was the Middle East increasingly seen as an important region for both the Soviet Union and the United States and its allies?
Why did the United States and the Soviet Union fight the Cold War in the "Third World"?
The reason why the Middle East was seen as an important region to the Soviet Union and the United States was its Oil and Strategic location.
The United States and the Soviet Union fought the Cold War in the 3rd World for strategic interests.
How did the Middle East get so important in the Cold War ?The Middle East is home to some of the world's largest reserves of oil, which is a vital resource for industrialized nations. Both the Soviet Union and the United States wanted to secure access to this oil to fuel their economies and militaries.
The Middle East is located at the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa, making it a strategically important region for controlling access to the Mediterranean, the Persian Gulf, and the Suez Canal.
The "Third World" countries were seen as strategically important because of their location, resources, and potential for economic development. Both the United States and the Soviet Union wanted to secure access to these resources and maintain a military presence in these areas to protect their interests.
Find out more on the Cold War at https://brainly.com/question/12943163
#SPJ1
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679): People are naturally selfish and evil; without a strong civilizing government to restrain humanity's violent impulses, the "state of nature" is a "war of all against all" and life is "nasty, brutish, and short."
John Locke (1632–1704): People are born blank slates, neither good nor bad. For that reason, each generation must take great care what environment they raise the next generation in, because everything they think will be based on what they are taught by people and circumstances.
John-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778): People are born naturally good and civilization corrupts them. If people could just ignore the confusing influence of social conventions and follow their natural instincts the world would be much better.
For this assignment, you will need to follow the essay format as made famous by Michel de Montaigne. He is credited with creating the essay, which literally comes from the French word for "trial," as in a weighing of evidence—so you can blame Montaigne for the essay.
Step 1
Start by evaluating the three positions outlined above, one at a time. For each, consider evidence that supports it and evidence that raises a problem for it. This is your personal reflection, so you can do research but for your evidence you may also just use your personal observations: have you seen yourself and others demonstrate natural goodness, badness, or neutrality?
Step 2
Having considered each, identify which of the three positions makes the most sense to you and explain why. This should be based on more than what you would like it to be. What makes one position's evidence stronger to you than the others? You need to explain this.
Step 3
For your final paragraph, you need to address a specific problem with the position you picked in step 2, as follows:
If you chose humans are naturally bad, how can any government be trusted if it consists of humans?
If you chose humans are naturally neutral, does that mean no one is ultimately responsible for their actions because they are just a product of their environment—what about historical figures who stood up to their societies and said something was wrong?
If you chose humans are naturally good, why are laws of any kind necessary?
Your assignment here is to write out your thoughts on the question of human nature, not provide the final answer. So think deeply about these ideas, but don't stress if you're not satisfied with your response in the final step—there is a reason people have been debating these issues for a few centuries and counting!
Human nature has been a topic of debate for centuries, with various philosophers presenting different perspectives on the subject. In this essay, I will evaluate the positions presented by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and identify the one that makes the most sense to me.
Thomas Hobbes argues that people are naturally selfish and evil and that without a strong government to restrain humanity's violent impulses, the "state of nature" is a "war of all against all" and life is "nasty, brutish, and short." This position is supported by evidence of war, conflict, and violence throughout history, as well as by the fact that people often act in their own self-interest. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people are inherently bad and that there is no hope for them to improve.
John Locke argues that people are born blank slates, neither good nor bad. For that reason, each generation must take great care what environment they raise the next generation in, because everything they think will be based on what they are taught by people and circumstances. This position is supported by the fact that people's actions and beliefs can be influenced by their environment and by the fact that people are capable of change. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people have no inherent nature and that they are just a product of their environment.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues that people are born naturally good and that civilization corrupts them. If people could just ignore the confusing influence of social conventions and follow their natural instincts, the world would be much better. This position is supported by the fact that people often act in ways that are beneficial to others and by the fact that people are capable of empathy and compassion. However, this position also raises a problem for it, as it suggests that people are inherently good and that there is no need for laws or government to restrain them.
After considering these three positions, I believe that the position presented by John Locke makes the most sense to me. I agree that people are not inherently good or bad, but rather that they are shaped by their environment and experiences. I also believe that people have the ability to change and improve based on their surroundings and that it is important for each generation to take great care in raising the next generation.
One problem with this position is that it suggests that people have no inherent nature and that they are just a product of their environment, which could be seen as excusing people from being ultimately responsible for their actions. However, I believe that people have the ability to make choices and that they are responsible for their actions, despite the influences of their environment.
In conclusion, the debate on human nature is a complex and ongoing one. While each position has its own strengths and weaknesses, I believe that the position presented by John Locke makes the most sense to me as it acknowledges that people are shaped by their environment, but also holds that people have the ability to make choices and take responsibility for their actions.
Thomas Hobbes - Humans are naturally selfish and evil: Hobbes' view of human nature posits that without strong civilizing governance, human behavior would devolve into a chaotic and violent state of nature. Evidence supporting this position can be found in historical conflicts, power struggles, and instances of aggression among individuals and groups.
Personal observations of selfish behavior and acts of violence also contribute to this argument. However, a problem with this perspective lies in the fact that humans are capable of acts of kindness, empathy, and cooperation, which indicates a more nuanced nature.
John Locke - Humans are born blank slates: Locke's theory suggests that individuals are born without innate characteristics and are shaped by their environment and experiences. Evidence in favor of this position can be found in the vast diversity of beliefs, behaviors, and personalities across different cultures and societies. Personal observations of people transforming under various circumstances align with Locke's blank slate concept. Nevertheless, the idea that humans are entirely malleable raises questions about any inherent moral compass and the origins of universal ethical principles.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Humans are born naturally good: Rousseau's perspective contends that humans are inherently good and that society's influence corrupts their inherent virtues. Evidence for this viewpoint lies in instances of compassion, altruism, and benevolence shown by individuals in various situations. Personal observations of acts of kindness and selflessness also reinforce this notion. However, a problem arises in explaining the presence of malevolence and cruelty in human history, suggesting that an entirely positive view of human nature might overlook important aspects of reality.
Step 2: My Perspective on Human Nature Among the three positions, John Locke's view that humans are born as blank slates resonates most with me. While I acknowledge the presence of both selfish and altruistic tendencies in humans, the idea that we are shaped significantly by our experiences, education, and environment seems compelling. Personal observations and experiences have shown that individuals can transform and grow positively or negatively based on their surroundings. The richness of human diversity and the potential for change and personal growth reinforce the notion that we start with a blank slate and become shaped through our experiences.
Step 3: Addressing a Problem with the Chosen Position While I lean towards Locke's view of humans as blank slates, a specific problem with this perspective is the question of ultimate responsibility. Historical figures who stood up to their societies and challenged prevailing norms and injustices serve as examples of human agency and the ability to transcend societal influences. This raises a paradox: if humans are purely products of their environment, how do we explain acts of moral courage and defiance against societal norms? Striking a balance between acknowledging the influence of the environment and accepting individual responsibility remains a complex challenge in understanding human nature.
Conclusion: In exploring the question of human nature, it becomes evident that the topic is multifaceted and open to various interpretations. Each position - Hobbes' pessimistic view, Locke's tabula rasa theory, and Rousseau's optimistic perspective - offers valuable insights into human behavior. While I find the idea of humans as blank slates compelling, it is essential to recognize the complexities of human nature and the ongoing nature of this philosophical debate.
To learn more about environment, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/5511643
#SPJ2
6. The American Declaration of Independence asserts that "all men are created equal." Write an essay in which you compare the American Revolution with the Haitian Revolution in light of this statement. Which revolution more fully accomplished the goal of equality? Be sure to include a clear thesis and address the following questions:
In what ways were the revolutions similar or different?
. Which revolution resulted in a new state that more completely lived up to the ideal that "all men are created equal"?
. How did the idea of equality apply in each case to gender, ethnicity, and/or social class?
i need this essay as soon as possible !!!
Answer: Different names and armies
Explanation:
Both the American and Haitian revolutions come close to accomplishing their initial political objectives. These two revolutions are regarded as the biggest in the western hemisphere.
Which revolution gave birth to a nation that more closely matched the principle that "all men are created equal"?The Haitian Revolution resulted in the creation of a new nation with the motto "all men have created equal." the revolution in Haiti. Haiti was founded as a result of this. eliminated slavery in the island country. By outlawing slavery, Haiti established itself as a country based on the principles of human equality and the prohibition of the ownership of slaves. Therefore, we can say that the Haitian Revolution more closely reflected the idea of equality for all men.
How was both revolution similar or different?In many ways, the American and Haitian revolutions were similar and dissimilar. First, George Washington and Toussaint L'Overture both served as major leaders of their respective revolutions. Second, while Americans were more concerned with the demands of the middle class, Haiti emphasized independence.
To know more about the American Revolution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ1
Which European explorer was the first to use new technologies, such as the Caravel and astrolabe, to sail around Africa to Asia?
A. Prince Henry
B. Christopher Columbus
C. Amerigo Vespucci
D. Bartolomeu Dias
Answer: D. Bartholomeu Diaz
Explanation:
I went with A. and it was wrong the answer is D.
Bartolomeu Dias was the first to use new technologies, such as the Caravel and astrolabe, to sail around Africa to Asia. The right answer is D.
Bartolomeu Dias, a Portuguese navigator, was the first to navigate about the southern tip of Africa, now known as the Cape of Good Hope, using cutting-edge instruments like the caravel and the astrolabe, opening up a sea route to Asia. This achievement marked an important turn in the Age of Exploration and allowed later explorers to establish direct trade routes with Asia.
The successful crossing of the Cape of Good Hope by Bartolomeu Dias in the late 15th century demonstrated that Asia could possibly be reached by water. His innovative use of the caravel, a swift and seaworthy ship, together with an astrolabe for navigation, altered the course of maritime exploration and trade for years to come.
The correct answer is option D.
Know more about Bartolomeu Dias here
https://brainly.com/question/1413066
#SPJ2
According to the excerpt above, what was Jefferson's primary interest in the rivers located in the Louisiana Territory?
Our United States was swiftly spreading westward in 1801, well beyond the Mississippi River's demarcation line and into what was then known as Louisiana.
What is most associated with Louisiana?Does Louisiana Have a Name For. Cajun and Creole food, Mardi Gras festivities, a rich cultural past, bayous, soul music, and the birthplace of the American blues are just a few of Louisiana's well-known attractions. French colonialism had a significant impact on the state as well.
Is it a smart idea to reside in Louisiana?Because of its diverse culture, affordable cost of living, plus pleasant weather all year round, Louisiana is a terrific destination to call home. You can keep my shorts in and not worry over shoveling snow there in morning when the wintertime highs exceed the 70s and 80s.
To know more about Louisiana visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2967972
#SPJ1
We shall fight on the beaches,we shall fight on the landing grounds,we shall fight in the fields and in the streets ,we shall fight in the hills ;we shall never surrender …”
Winston Churchill said this to English people during the dark days of of World War 2 when London was being bombed every night by the German air force. Indeed,it was this spirit that led to the Allied victory.I am wondering,do we in America have that same spirit today?What do you think? Explain your answer
Answer:
America in today's society does not share the same spirit today. The spirit instilled by Winston Churchill to the people of the United Kingdom is that of loyalty to country, and protection of the traditional ideals of the "free world". The United States, in today's society, does not follow the same spirit today, particularly in today's administration.
This is especially exemplified by the standard foreign policy implemented by the current administration, in failing to protect the United States and her policies. For example, the current administration initiated a botched withdrawal in Afghanistan, which led to a power vacuum in the Middle East, and the complete renewal of the Taliban, a paramilitary terrorist group. While the withdrawal may be justified, it is the application of how the withdrawal occurred that goes against the spirit of Winston Churchill. The United States was tired of finding endless wars in which there was no clear policy in what was supposed to be accomplished.
However, the most important ideal submitted by Churchill's speech is the instilling of nationalistic pride and the calling to the ideals held by the country's history. In today's particular administration, the traditional ideals are not upheld, but rather shunned for unnatural policies that, rather than justified by results, is justified by personal feelings. America, as such, does not have the same spirit instilled by Winston Churchill in World War II, and instead can be seen as a clear contrast to what Churchill wished the British people to have in their trying times.
Learn more about British involvement in World War II, here:
https://brainly.com/question/22997578 - How lend-lease act helped British involvement in the war.
4.2.4 Practice: The Boxer Rebellion
U.S. History since the Civil War Honors
Points Possible: 30
Apex Learning - Practice Assignment
Reasons in favor of U.S. involvement in the
Boxer Rebellion:
Your Assignment
1. In a T-chart, list reasons for United States intervention in the Boxer Rebellion.
Reasons against U.S. Involvement in the Boxer
Rebellion:
Reasons for United States intervention in the Boxer Rebellion.
American citizens were assaulted by boxers. The security of American citizens was under threat.Reasons against U.S. Involvement in the Boxer Rebellion
Americans who weren't the targets of an attack might have been pointed out due to American Intervention in teh movement.It can lead to Prospective violation of the rights of US citizens whose rights had not been abused.What is Boxer Rebellion?Chinese independence was clearly marked during the Boxer Rebellion. Due to the hatred displayed by the Boxers, who assaulted foreigners and US citizens alike, US involvement in the case is significant for the safety of its people.
In the given case, it already abuses US citizens so involvement of the US might cretes a risk for the remaining ones and they might get attacked by the Boxers in China.
Learn more about Boxer Rebellion, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12983877
#SPJ1
President Ronald Reagan met with which
Soviet Union leader to discuss nuclear arms
reduction during the 1980's?
A. Fidel Castro
B. Leonid Brezhnev
C. Mikhail Gorbachev
Both Presidents Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev seriously addressed the prospect of getting rid of all of their respective countries' nuclear weapons as well as all of their ballistic missiles
Gorbachev's fall of the USSR?On December 25, Gorbachev announced his resignation and gave Yeltsin, the new president of the Russian Federation, authority of his executive branch, including the nuclear launch codes. The Russian tricolor flag was raised in the Kremlin that evening when the Soviet flag was down.
How was the Soviet Union altered under Gorbachev?The most important change made by Gorbachev in the international economic sector was to enable foreigners to participate in the Soviet Union through joint ventures with state-owned companies, cooperatives, and ministries.
To know more about Mikhail Gorbachev visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3681790
#SPJ1
From the spirit of laws by Charles Louis Montesquieu 1749
And from a vindication of the rights of woman by Mary Wollstonecraft 1792 help me start them please!!!
Answer:
Could u paste that DBQ link?
Explanation:
Describe how ww2 is a consequence of ww1
The major causes of World War II were numerous. They include the impact of the Treaty of Versailles following WWI, the worldwide economic depression, failure of appeasement, the rise of militarism in Germany and Japan, and the failure of the League of Nations.
Discussion Questions by Document Setqbxjk
Slavery and Enslaved Persons Discussion Questions
●
●
Notice how many of these documents refer to wills. How could individual attempts to
list and distribute property disrupt slavery? How could the practice of wills maintain
slavery? 1.
Several of these documents are evidence of resistance to slavery. What actions could
the enslaved take to resist their enslavers and/or emancipate themselves?
How did the enslavers in these documents price freedom? What do the variations in
value for each case suggest?
Their efforts have proven to be highly effective. Abolitionists focused attention on slavery and made it difficult to ignore. Slaves were considered property because they were black. Their status as property was coercively enforced, either in fact or under threat.
How did slaves resist slavery?"Daily resistance" was the most common form of resistance to slavery. Destroying tools, feigning illness, staging slowdowns, arson and sabotage were all forms of resistance and a manifestation of the slave's alienation from his master. Running away was another form of resistance.
What methods were used to control slavery?These included flogging, slave laws, so-called slave laws, the use of religion, and constant punishment and intimidation. All of these methods were designed to keep the slave under control.
What are the ways that Constitution used to protect slavery.The specific provisions of the Constitution related to slavery were the Three-Fifths Clause, the 20-Year Parliamentary Ban on ending the slave Trade, the Fugitive Slaves Clause, and the Slave Rebellion.
To learn more about slavery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19333280
#SPJ1
How did the Ku Klux Klan gain popularity in the North in the 1910s and 1920s?
A) by focusing on anti-women sentiment
B) by focusing on anti-Prohibition sentiment
C) by focusing on anti-immigrant sentiment
D) by focusing on anti-fundamentalist sentiment
The way that the Ku Klux Klan gained popularity in the North in the 1910s and 1920s was B) by focusing on anti-Prohibition sentiment.
Why were the Ku Klux Klan anti - Prohibitionist ?The Ku Klux Klan was anti-prohibitionist for various reasons, one of which was their belief in states' rights. They saw the Prohibition movement and the passing of the 18th Amendment as an infringement on states' rights, as it was a federal law regulating behavior and commerce within individual states.
Additionally, the Klan saw Prohibition as a failure, as it increased crime and corruption, rather than reducing alcohol consumption as intended. The Klan also saw the Prohibition movement as being led by and benefiting northeastern, urban, and primarily Protestant interests, while disregarding the views and needs of rural and southern, primarily Protestant communities. This allowed them to become popular in the North.
Find out more on the Ku Klux Klan at https://brainly.com/question/3837990
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast the benefits of conventional building with green building
Answer:
Conventional building refers to the traditional methods of construction that have been used for many years. These buildings are typically less expensive to construct and can be built more quickly than green buildings. They may also be more familiar to builders and architects, which can make the design and construction process easier.
Green building, on the other hand, refers to the practice of designing and constructing buildings that are more environmentally friendly and energy efficient. They can also improve indoor air quality, reduce energy costs, and increase the overall comfort of the building's occupants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope this answer helped :) !
The Kingdoms of Kongo and Axum both had leadership that
refused to participate in the slave trade
converted to Islam
converted to Christianity
built pyramidal tombs for themselves
Answer:
Kongo converted to Islam, Axum converted to Christianity.
Explanation:
Because B.Ch 4th century Izana is the first Ethiopian person who converted to Christianity.the Arab slave in 18th or 19th century trade which increasingly drew coastal traders into the interior in search of slaves and ivory.
Describe FOUR ways in which the political organization of the Taino was different from the political organization of the Kalinago.
Answer:
1. The Taino had a hierarchical political structure with a paramount chief at the top, while the Kalinago had a more egalitarian system of governance with no single chief.
2. The Taino had a centralized political system with a single leader who had authority over the entire population, while the Kalinago had a decentralized system with multiple leaders who shared power.
3. The Taino had a more formalized system of governance, with laws and regulations, while the Kalinago had a less formal system with fewer laws and regulations.
4. The Taino had a more militaristic approach to politics, with a standing army and a system of fortifications, while the Kalinago had a more peaceful approach to politics, with no standing army or fortifications.
Explanation:
Identify, explain and classify the different kinds of property
Corporeal property and incorporeal property are the two primary forms of property. In contrast to the incorporeal property, which cannot be seen or touched, the corporeal property is both.
What is Property?Property is something over which a person or company has legal authority.
The various types of property include Movable Property. Property that is mobile can be transferred from one location to another without getting damaged. Any property that cannot be transferred from one location to another is considered immovable. Tangible Property, Intangible Property, Public Property, Private Property, Personal Property, Real Property, and others.
Therefore, Basically, the property is of two categories: Corporeal Property and Incorporeal Property.
Learn more about Property, here;
https://brainly.com/question/29528698
#SPJ1
50 POINTS!!!
What expressed power of
Congress allows lawmakers to
adjust the minimum wage or
protect workers from harm?
Answer:
Implied powers
Explanation:
not stated in the Constitution, but drawn from the expressed powers. Based on the expressed power to regulate commerce, Congress has set a minimum wage for hourly workers.
PLEASE
Introduction
In this activity, you will discuss the philosophies that led to this design for the US federal government. You will also discuss about how the Framers of the Constitution convinced their fellow citizens that this was the best way to avoid tyranny.
__________________________________________________________________________
Directions and Analysis
Task: Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances
Perform online research and read Federalist papers 10 and Federalist 51. Select passages from Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 that explain the reasons checks and balances are necessary. Explain the benefit of separation of powers as a way to address the reasons for checks and balances.
Type your response here:
Answer:
In Federalist 10, James Madison argued that the US Constitution should be organized in such a way as to prevent the rise of any one faction or group from gaining too much power. He argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances between the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) would be the best way to ensure that no one group or faction could gain too much control. This would prevent any one group from gaining too much power and becoming tyrannical.
The benefit of separation of powers is that it allows each branch of government to act as a check on the power of the other branches. This ensures that no one branch can gain too much power and become tyrannical. Furthermore, it ensures that the government is more accountable to the people, as each branch of government is held accountable to the other branches. This allows for a more balanced government that is more responsive to the people.
Explanation:
What stands out about the horrid massacre in Virginia
Answer:
The horrid massacre in Virginia that occurred on May 31, 2019 stands out as one of the deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history. A gunman opened fire at a municipal building in Virginia Beach, killing twelve people and injuring four others. The shooter was a city employee who had been employed with the city for 15 years. He was eventually shot and killed by police. The tragedy has sparked a nationwide debate about gun control laws and other measures to prevent mass shootings.
Explanation:
How was the United States impacted after world war II
Answer:
george washingston
Explanation:
ah
Part D
Analyze the mood and tone of "Winter Dreams."
The mood and tone of "Winter Dreams" would be disappointed, because Dexter Green does not able to find happiness.
What was the mood and tone of "Winter Dreams"?The mood and tone of this story describe Dexter having to pay a higher price for success, as well as his ability to be happy being limited by social mobility.
Judy's personality is shown to be distressing, regardless of her wealth. Judy's hazy hope describes how money or power do not increase satisfaction.
The character of Dexter Greene, who always considered the luxurious cloths while achieving their financial goals, exemplifies the theme of disillusionment in this story.
Learn more about "Winter Dreams", refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13457313
#SPJ1
Why did China and the Soviet Union decide to support North Korea after World War II?
A. They wanted to add Korea's territory to their own.
B. They wanted to spread communism to other countries.
C. They wanted to gain access to more ports on the Pacific Ocean.
D. They wanted to strengthen their defenses against Japan and the US.
Answer:
B. They wanted to spread communism to other countries.
Explanation:
Communist China joined North Korea in the war in November 1950, unleashing a massive Chinese ground attack against American forces. The invasion of South Korea made Truman genuinely fearful that the Soviet Union and China intended to expand the sphere of communism
What benefit did the extermination camps have over other methods that Nazis used to get rid of large numbers of Jews, such as mass executions performed by Einsatzgruppen?
They could kill a large number of people at once.
They could keep better track of those who were killed.
There was more privacy to kill in the camps.
The camps didn’t require personnel to run.
Answer:
Explanation:
Extermination camps had many benefits over other methods used by Nazis to get rid of large numbers of Jews. One major benefit was the ability to carry out mass killings quickly and efficiently. By having Jews transported to the camps, the Nazis could kill a large number of people in a relatively short amount of time. Additionally, the camps allowed for better record-keeping, as the Nazis were able to keep track of how many people were killed and where.
Another advantage of extermination camps was the privacy they provided for the mass killings. Unlike mass executions performed by Einsatzgruppen, which were conducted in public and in broad daylight, the camps allowed for the killings to take place in relative secrecy. This allowed the Nazis to be more efficient in their methods, as well as avoid drawing attention to the atrocities being committed.
Finally, extermination camps had a major advantage in that they did not require personnel to run them. Unlike the Einsatzgruppen, which required large numbers of personnel to carry out the mass executions, the extermination camps were largely automated and self-sustaining, requiring only a small number of personnel to oversee the process. This allowed the Nazis to carry out their genocidal plans with great efficiency.
This summary of the U.S. Bill of Rights was prepared for a guidebook about the United States for foreign tourists. Check the summary and the footnotes for the author's bias. The U.S. Bill of Rights consists of 10 amendments that specify the fundamental rights of Americans. This summary includes rights listed in seven of those amendments. Rights Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights Individuals have freedom of religion, speech, the press, and assembly; they may petition the government for "redress of grievances."1 Individuals have "the right to keep and bear arms."2 Individuals cannot be forced to shelter troops in private homes during peacetime.3 An individual accused of a serious offense cannot be tried twice4 for the same crime or forced to testify when on trial. An individual accused of a crime must be given a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury with the assistance of a lawyer. An individual jailed for a crime cannot be subject to excessive bail, an excessive fine, or "cruel and unusual punishment."6 The states or individuals retain powers not delegated to the federal government. Footnotes 1 This phrase is used in the original eighteenth-century document. To "redress" means to "set right." Lenient U.S. gun control laws are based on this phrase from the 2nd Amendment. 3 This amendment is reflective of a British practice during the colonial era. 4 This practice is referred to in the U.S. Constitution as "double jeopardy." SA trial in the United States may not be delayed by the government for months or years. U.S. courts have ruled on the meaning of this phrase several times. 7 This amendment is indicative of the American system whereby powers are divided between the national government and the state governments. Type your answer in the box. Of the 7 footnotes, only footnote reveals evidence of the author's bias.
The summary provided in this guidebook for foreign tourists appears to be generally objective and informative, providing a clear overview of the rights guaranteed by the U.S. Bill of Rights. However, there is one footnote that reveals evidence of the author's bias. Specifically, footnote 2 states that "lenient U.S. gun control laws are based on this phrase from the 2nd Amendment." This statement suggests that the author believes U.S. gun control laws are too lenient, which is a matter of opinion and not a fact.
The other footnotes in the summary provide useful historical context and clarification for the rights outlined in the Bill of Rights. For example, footnote 1 explains that the phrase "redress of grievances" is used in the original document and means "to set right." Footnote 3 explains that the amendment regarding troops in private homes during peacetime is reflective of a British practice during the colonial era. Footnote 4 clarifies that the practice of not being tried twice for the same crime is referred to as "double jeopardy" in the U.S. Constitution. Footnote 6 states that U.S. courts have ruled on the meaning of the phrase "cruel and unusual punishment" several times. And, footnote 7 highlights that the amendment is indicative of the American system of dividing powers between the national government and state governments.
In conclusion, this summary provides a clear and informative overview of the rights guaranteed by the U.S. Bill of Rights, but one of the footnotes reveals evidence of the author's bias. The other footnotes provide useful historical context and clarification for the rights outlined in the Bill of Rights. So, it is important to consider this bias when reading the summary.
The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The amendment was created by James Madison in response to requests from various states to strengthen constitutional protections for individual liberty.
What is the US Bill of Rights?The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the Constitution. It defines the rights of Americans to government. It guarantees individual civil rights and liberties such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion. Inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, the American Bill of Rights was passed, and in 1791 first ten amendments to the Constitution were enacted into law nationally.
What are the 10 amendments in order?Amendment I. Freedoms, Petitions, Assembly.
Amendment II. Right to bear arms.
Amendment III. Quartering of soldiers.
Amendment IV. Search and arrest.
Amendment V. Rights in criminal cases.
Amendment VI. Right to a fair trial.
Amendment VII. Rights in civil cases.
Amendment VIII. Bail, fines, punishment.
To learn more about Bill of Rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16237105
#SPJ1
Your team is redesigning the used-car website for AnyTown Car Sales and is planning a usability test. Based on the documents provided, which scenario would be best?
Your team is redesigning the used-car website for AnyTown Car Sales and is planning a usability test. Based on the documents provided, the scenario that would be best is a learning scenario.
What is a usability test?A usability test is a method used to evaluate the ease of use and user-friendliness of a product, such as a website, mobile app, or software program. It typically involves recruiting a group of users to perform a series of tasks or complete a questionnaire while interacting with the product, and then analyzing the results to identify areas for improvement. The goal of a usability test is to identify usability problems, measure the usability of a user interface, and gather data to support design decisions.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It can be concluded that a learning scenario will help the designer identify the usability problems and hence, support design decisions.
learn more about usability test: https://brainly.com/question/28807738
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Your team is redesigning the used-car website for AnyTown Car Sales and is planning a usability test. Based on the documents provided, which scenario would be best for your team to present in order to ascertain and guide against likely problems that arise from the usage of the used-car and what the customer may be looking forward to get from the purchase?
