choose the sentence in which the verb has a direct object
a.they won the game
b.George is furious
c.She is insecure
d.I walked away

The answer is C, the speaker..!!!

Answer:

Therefore, she liked it anyway.

I like cats, but they don't like me

Explanation:

Answer:

There were many people simple looking out to the water, playing games, or enjoying delectable treats on the fine cruise; but no one was seen enjoying the artwork on the walls.

The trees of the forest grew tall and mighty; when the leaves of the tree's in the forest changed color, it was a beautiful sight.

Explanation:

Answer:A

Explanation:

Answer:

A.) the two grades for certain activities like gymnastics.

Explanation:

the definition of integrated  is ,to make up, combine, or complete to produce a whole or a larger unit, as parts do. A is the only answer that is talking about two things.

Question:

Which character is described in these lines? (10 points) Lord of the Scyldings, this single petition? Not to refuse me, defender of warriors, Friend-lord of folks, so far have I sought thee, That I may unaided, my earlmen assisting me, This brave-mooded war-band, purify Heorot.

A. Beowulf

B. Grendel

C. Hrothgar

D. Higelac

Answer:

A. Beowulf

Alienate is synonymous to separate. So it will alienate them from the group

Answer: nothing

Explanation:

Answer:

We don't have anything to read to see what is the main idea.

Explanation:

Answer:

dhhdhn chjbvvhnccbb cgn cxgbbcccb

When I was growing up, children were commonly taught: “don’t talk to strangers.” Strangers might be bad, we were told, so it’s prudent to steer clear of them.

And yet most people are honest, kind, and generous, especially when someone asks them for help. If a small child is in trouble, the smartest thing he can do is find a nice-looking stranger and talk to him.

These two pieces of advice may seem to contradict each other, but they don’t. The difference is that in the second instance, the child is choosing which stranger to talk to. Given that the overwhelming majority of people will help, the child is likely to get help if he chooses a random stranger. But if a stranger comes up to a child and talks to him or her, it’s not a random choice. It’s more likely, although still unlikely, that the stranger is up to no good.

As a species, we tend help each other, and a surprising amount of our security and safety comes from the kindness of strangers. During disasters: floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, bridge collapses. In times of personal tragedy. And even in normal times.

If you’re sitting in a cafe working on your laptop and need to get up for a minute, ask the person sitting next to you to watch your stuff. He’s very unlikely to steal anything. Or, if you’re nervous about that, ask the three people sitting around you. Those three people don’t know each other, and will not only watch your stuff, but they’ll also watch each other to make sure no one steals anything.

Again, this works because you’re selecting the people. If three people walk up to you in the café and offer to watch your computer while you go to the bathroom, don’t take them up on that offer. Your odds of getting three honest people are much lower.

Some computer systems rely on the kindness of strangers, too. The Internet works because nodes benevolently forward packets to each other without any recompense from either the sender or receiver of those packets. Wikipedia works because strangers are willing to write for, and edit, an encyclopedia – with no recompense.

Collaborative spam filtering is another example. Basically, once someone notices a particular e-mail is spam, he marks it, and everyone else in the network is alerted that it’s spam. Marking the e-mail is a completely altruistic task; the person doing it gets no benefit from the action. But he receives benefit from everyone else doing it for other e-mails.

Tor is a system for anonymous Web browsing. The details are complicated, but basically, a network of Tor servers passes Web traffic among each other in such a way as to anonymize where it came from. Think of it as a giant shell game. As a Web surfer, I put my Web query inside a shell and send it to a random Tor server. That server knows who I am but not what I am doing. It passes that shell to another Tor server, which passes it to a third. That third server — which knows what I am doing but not who I am — processes the Web query. When the Web page comes back to that third server, the process reverses itself and I get my Web page. Assuming enough Web surfers are sending enough shells through the system, even someone eavesdropping on the entire network can’t figure out what I’m doing.

It’s a very clever system, and it protects a lot of people, including journalists, human rights activists, whistleblowers, and ordinary people living in repressive regimes around the world. But it only works because of the kindness of strangers. No one gets any benefit from being a Tor server; it uses up bandwidth to forward other people’s packets around. It’s more efficient to be a Tor client and use the forwarding capabilities of others. But if there are no Tor servers, then there’s no Tor. Tor works because people are willing to set themselves up as servers, at no benefit to them.

Alibi clubs work along similar lines. You can find them on the Internet, and they’re loose collections of people willing to help each other out with alibis. Sign up, and you’re in. You can ask someone to pretend to be your doctor and call your boss. Or someone to pretend to be your boss and call your spouse. Or maybe someone to pretend to be your spouse and call your boss. Whatever you want, just ask and some anonymous stranger will come to your rescue. And because your accomplice is an anonymous stranger, it’s safer than asking a friend to participate in your ruse.

There are risks in these sorts of systems. Regularly, marketers and other people with agendas try to manipulate Wikipedia entries to suit their interests. Intelligence agencies can, and almost certainly have, set themselves up as Tor servers to better eavesdrop on traffic. And a do-gooder could join an alibi club just to expose other members. But for the most part, strangers are willing to help each other, and systems that harvest this kindness work very well on the Internet.

1. They are responsible for caring for there husband.

2. as mothers, they were liable for producing and guiding the next generation of Puritan children.

Answer: to love, obey and further the interests and will of her husband

Explanation:

Answer:

Examples of the benefits to the US economy from trade with China include: China purchased $165 billion in goods and services from the United States in 2015, representing 7.3 percent of all US exports and about 1 percent of total US economic output.

Explanation:

Examples of the benefits to the US economy from trade with China include: China purchased $165 billion in goods and services from the United States in 2015, representing 7.3 percent of all US exports and about 1 percent of total US economic output.

B because This is a narrative technique where events are portrayed out of chronological order or the logical order presented in the story. The pattern of events needs to jump around and not follow a linear pattern. A nonlinear narrative can also be known as a disjointed narrative or disrupted narrative

Hope this helps.

Answer:

Friends

Explanation:

From the Friar's Tale, it is easily conclude that the Friar has no respect for Summoners and holds them in unworthy.

What is the summary of the "Friar's tale"?

"The Friar's Tale" is a story in The Canterbury Tales that is written by Geoffrey Chaucer and told by Huberd the Friar. Geoffrey Chaucer was an English poet and author, who was born in 1340, London, United Kingdom. He was very well known for The Canterbury Tales. He has been called the "father of English literature.

In "The Friar's Tale", the Friar tells the the story of a Summoner and a Yeoman. The main theme of the story is the humiliation and degradation of members of a certain profession. It begins from the point  by exposing the means by which summoners blackmail the persons.

Basically, the story is all about  a corrupt summoner and his interactions with the Devil. It is preceded by The Wife of Bath's Tale and followed by The Summoner's Tale.

Learn more about "Friar's tale" here:-

https://brainly.com/question/11064400

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

i am going to seep will answer in the morning to tired

The meaning of the sentence would change if it was changed to realized because that would’ve meant that Gregor would’ve been fully aware that he changed into a bug. The word monstrous references to his size.

*i read this before, so i have some knowledge on it

Answer:

A. A historical perspective would focus on arranged marriage being part of the culture at the time the story is set. A feminist perspective would focus on how arranged marriages took choice away from women.

Explanation:

How could the characters’ differing views of arranged marriage be analyzed from a historical perspective and from a feminist perspective?

Answer:

turns & twists, all decisions, character's flaws and background circumstances

Explanation:

Answer: climax, Plots (know as exposition)

Answer:

i think because she was independent. sorry don't know

Explanation:

(This is a list I came up with)

-Plan some balanced activities

-Plan enough time to study all subjects

-Set a time and consistant place

-Study as soon after class as you can

-

Answer:

because she's talking about herself?

Can you please elaborate on the question? I don’t quite understand

Answer :meticulously

Explanation:

meticulouslys definition; in a way that shows great attention to detail; very thoroughly.

Answer:

They will be mad.

Explanation:

cus i dont think anyone likes to be held down.

Answer:sorry

Explanation:

never watched it tbh to sry again yea my bad

.·´¯`(>▂<)´¯`·..·´¯`(>▂<)´¯`·..·´¯`(>▂<)´¯`·.

yay

re and fer, re means “to” and fer means “bear” to bear.

Answer:

thats the best feeling

Explanation:

Is there no like multiple choice or more context

Answer: a- it shows the reader who Cynthia is based on her words and actions.

Explanation: I just did it and got it corrected

Answer:

A just took the test hope I helped.

Explanation:

Don't forget to press he thanks button please!!!

::::))))))

A simile uses words such as “like” or “as” to compare something while a metaphor directly compares the two.

well, good for sarah!!

Answer:

yay!

Explanation:

Answer:

his reasoning is true

Explanation:

Answer:

in picture

Explanation:

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.  

The crowd cheered when Ben intercepted the quarterback’s badly aimed pass, then the fans  threw half-eaten hot dogs and popcorn boxes as Ben rushed into the wrong end zone,  scoring a touchdown for the Boone High Braves, the opposing team.

A. ... pass, but then ...

B. ... pass; but, then ...

C. ... pass, however, then ...

D. No change is necessary.

Answer: B. ... pass; but, then ...

Explanation:

In this example, we have two independent clauses (simple sentences) put together into a compound sentence; however, since the second one is in contrast with the first one (although Ben was cheered at first, he gets stuff thrown at him later) the appropriate coordinating conjunctions should be a semicolon followed by "but, then".  

The correct sentence would be:  

The crowd cheered when Ben intercepted the quarterback’s badly aimed pass; but, then the fans threw half-eaten hot dogs and popcorn boxes as Ben rushed into the wrong end zone, scoring a touchdown for the Boone High Braves, the opposing team.