Answer:
I think they are all what the class mission statement would reflect, so I guess it depends on what your mission statement is it and what the class is, so like if it was "work hard play harder" you would think oh that class get benefits for working hard yk Im sorry I really hope that helps if you give me a little more information like what class it is or what the mission statement is I could help a little more :)
What is meant by consumer's equillibrium and how it is related to the demand of a product?
Answer:
Consumer equilibrium refers to a scenario in which a consumer derives maximum happiness from the consumption of one (or more) things with his current income and price, and has no desire to change.
Explanation:
How the Supreme Court explained each evidence?
Answer:
Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction, it usually does not hold trials. Instead, the Court's task is to interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied.
Explanation:
Which of the following resulted from the court’s ruling in Marbury v. Madison?
Select one:
a.
The Bill of Rights became part of the Constitution
b.
The power of the president increased
c.
The power of the government was limited
d.
The power of the judicial branch expanded
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a court case that resided with William Marbury being appointed by John Adams, but during the process of his commission, Thomas Jefferson became president, and he and Secretary of State James Madison, added new courts and new judges. William Marbury's commission was not delivered to him, therefore petitioning to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of his commission.
The Court found Madison's refusal to deliver commissions was illegal but did not grant Marbury a writ of mandamus. Instead, the court held that Marbury did not have the right, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to claim to the Supreme Court that Madison's act was unconstitutional.
The court knew that a writ of mandamus would be the proper way to fix the situation, but concluded that the court couldn't issue it. Therefore making it clear that Congress did not have the power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation.
Doing this, the Supreme Court established the principle in judicial review and expanded the powers by having the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
Hope that helps your question.
Even though the Wernicke-Geschwind Model does not make good predictions about what will happen if a particular individual sustains brain damage, why would you still learn the Wernicke-Geschwind Model?
Even though the model does not predict what would happen if a person has brain damage, I would still learn the Wernicke-Geschwind model because of its usefulness in directing research and also for research results.
This model although its now obsolete taught that language has two functions
For comprehensionFor speechAccording to the model, language is used to listen to spoken word as sound is moved down from the auditory canal to the auditory cortex before it makes its way to the area where the meaning of the sound is established.
For a person to speak, the meaning of words are sent from the person's Broca area to his Wernicke area.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/14120702?referrer=searchResults
What exactly Labove did in order to collect formal and informal speech ???
According to research studies, Labov used sociolinguistic interviews to collect formal and informal speech.
William Labov made this research study titled " The social stratification of English in New York City."
The research study was published in 1966.
A sociolinguistic interview is a form of interview designed to gather linguistic data in varying speech situations.
Socio-linguistic interviews usually have both informal sections and formal sections.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "sociolinguistic interviews."
Learn more about the sociolinguistic interview here: https://brainly.com/question/13218559
what are the
mainly three groups of humans
Rhonda created a table to classify materials that conduct electricity and materials that do not conduct electricity. Which table correctly classifies these materials? Materials That Conduct Electricity Materials That Do Not Conduct Electricity steel plastic copper glass gold rubber aluminum wood Materials That Conduct Electricity Materials That Do Not Conduct Electricity steel plastic gold glass aluminum rubber wood copper Materials That Conduct Electricity Materials That Do Not Conduct Electricity plastic gold rubber steel aluminum glass wood copper Materials That Conduct Electricity Materials That Do Not Conduct Electricity plastic gold rubber steel glass aluminum wood copper
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Please mark me as brainliest
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Which of the following qualifications for voting was virtually eliminated in all states by the 1850s?
a. Gender
b. Grandfather clauses
c. Literacy requirements
d. Poll taxes
e. Property ownership
Gawain 3
A. Tukuyin ang panahunan o aspekto ng pandiwang may salungguhit sa pangungusap. Isulat sa patlang ang PN kung pangnagdaan,PK kung pangkasalukuyan, PH kung panghinaharap.
___1. Sumisibol na ang mga binhi ng upo.
___2. Si Miguel ay maagang umalis kanina.
___3. Nagdidilig ng halaman si ate tuwing umaga
___4. Si Ruto ay dumalaw sa maysakit noong isang araw.
___5. Tatawagan kita mamayang gabi.
___6. Nagpapahinga sa ilalim ng puno si Edgar.
___7. Mahusay na sumayaw ang pangkat sa harap ng panauhin.
___8. Ang mga kamote ay tinalupan ni Rita kagabi.
___9. Suose ay tinutulungan ng kanyang mga kaibigan
___10. Ang mga gamit ay inilipat ni Mang Ador sa kabilang kwarto.
(pandiwang may salungguhit)
1.Sumisibol
2.umalis
3.Nagdidilig
4.dumalaw
5.Tatawagan
6.Nagpapahinga
7.sumayaw
8.tinalupan
9.tinutulungan
10.inilipat
Answer:
1: PK
2:PH
3:PK
4:PN
5:PK
6:PN
7:PH
8:PK
9:PH
10:PN
Explanation:
CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG WAG PURO BOBO AT TANGA SINASABI SABIHIN NYO LANG NA MALI GETS? OK THANKS ♡_♡
Why was salt valuble in the Trana-Saharan trade?
Explanation:
Salt was a highly valued commodity not only because it was unobtainable in the sub-Saharan region but because it was constantly consumed and supply never quite met the total demand. There was also the problem that such a bulky item cost more to transport in significant quantities, which only added to its high price.
How do animals adapt in their environment?
The president does which of the following when making an appointment to the Supreme Court?
Select one:
a.
Tends to ignore race as a consideration for selecting a judge
b.
Often selects a candidate who is neither decidedly liberal or conservative
c.
Remains impartial by refusing candidate endorsements from members of the Supreme Court
d.
Tends to choose judges from their own political party
How was
Georgia different from other Southern colonies?
Answer: Hello!
The warm climate in the Georgia Colony made it much easier for diseases to spread, unlike in the New England Colonies where colder winters made it more difficult to farm year round but made it more difficult for diseases to thrive. Natural resources in the Georgia Colony included timber, agricultural land, and fish.
Explanation:
Mark me brainest please. Hope I helped! Hope you make an 100%
Anna♥
What are Cherokees Apache and Navajo tribe’s origins and connection with present activities
Answer:
Linguistic, archaeological, and historical evidence indicate that the ancestors of these groups were members of hunting-and-gathering cultures that migrated to the region from present-day Canada, arriving by approximately ad 1500, although no earlier than ad 1100. The Navajo occupied a portion of the Colorado Plateau adjacent to Hopi lands.
Six experts in their respective fields are traveling together on a train trip.
They sit facing each other, in groups of three, as indicated by the diagram
below.
The six experts are an essayist, an archaeologist, a musician, a novelist, a
playwright and poet. Each one has written a book in his special field and
each one is now reading a book that was written by one of the others. No
two people are reading the same book.
Expert B is sitting between the essayist and the musician. The essayist is
sitting opposite the archaelogist. Expert D is sitting opposite the novelist.
Expert E is sitting next to the playwright. Expert A is reading essays. Expert
C is reading a book written by the person sitting opposite of him. Expert D
is reading a book written by the playwright. Expert A is sitting in the corner
and has not interest in archaelogist. Expert C is sitting between the
Novelist and the Archaelogist. Expert E is reading a book written by the
musician. Expert F has never read a book of poetry. Obviously he is not a poet.
According to the information provided, the experts are seated as follows:
Musician (D) is reading playwright - Novelist (A) is reading essays
Poet (B) is reading a novel - Playwright (C) is reading the poem
Essayist (F) IS reading Archaeologist - Archaeologist (E) is reading Musician
To know the distribution of the experts, it must be taken into account that they are seated face to face in rows of 3 seats. Also, each of them is reading a different book than the one she wrote and cannot read the same book as another expert.
According to the first clue, Expert B is seated between the essayist and the musician. That means that the musician and the essayist are in the same row at the corners.
According to the second clue, the archaeologist is sitting opposite the essayist, so it can be inferred that he is in the other row, in the corner.
According to the ninth clue, the novelist is in the same row as the archaeologist in the other corner.
According to the third track, the musician is expert D because he is sitting across from the novelist.
According to the seventh track, the musician is reading a book written by the playwright.
According to the sixth clue, Expert C (can be the playwright or the poet) is reading a book written by the person sitting in front him. From this, it can be inferred that the playwright is expert C and is reading a poem.
So, in one row is the archaeologist, the playwright (C), and the novelist, and in the other row is the essayist, the poet (B), and the musician (D).
According to the eighth clue, Expert A is not interested in archeology, so he is the novelist or the essayist. Additionally, according to the fifth track, expert A is reading essays, so it cannot be the essayist who reads his texts. It can be inferred that expert A is the novelist.
According to the fourth clue, expert E, is the archaeologist because he is sitting next to the playwright and the novelist is already identified as expert A.
According to the above, the only one who remains to be identified with a letter is the essayist, so it can be inferred that he is the expert F.
At this point, we have discovered all the letters and the locations of the experts and we only need to know who reads what.
According to the tenth clue, the archaeologist is reading the musician's book.
According to the eleventh clue, the essayist has never read a poem, so it can be inferred that he is reading an archeology book because it is the only possible alternative.
Finally, it can be inferred that the poet is reading a novel, because it is the last available alternative.
According to the above, the location of the experts, the letters with which they identify themselves, and the books they read are not repeated.
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/13712062
According to the cost-push theory, what is responsible for inflation?
Too much money is in circulation.
Demand for goods and services exceeds existing supply.
The economy is operating as though there was a war.
Producers raise prices to meet increased costs.
Answer: the answer is demand for goods and services exceeds existing supply.
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
How does the government of the present-day United States differ from the government of ancient Greece?
A.
The Senate leads the US government; consuls led the government of ancient Greece.
B.
The United States is a representative democracy; ancient Greece was a direct democracy.
C.
US juries contain ordinary citizens; juries in ancient Greece were made up of aristocrats.
D.
Citizens elect members of the US Senate; consuls chose members of the Senate in Greece.
E.
The US government is divided into two branches; a sole government body existed in Greece.
Answer:
B is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Modern America is a representative Democracy, that is, a Democracy where citizens elect people to represent them in Government. In Ancient Greece, citizens directly voted on measures making it a direct Democracy. The difference is that the United States are a republic whereas the Athenian state was a city-state meaning that they didn't have a vast land and representatives to represent various parts of the land and people from that area. Ancient Greek government featured a direct representational structure. This meant that all eligible voters had input in many of the decisions that were made in contrast to the American republic style of government in which voters election politicians who cast votes on the issues at hand on their behalf.
Have a great day! :D
Question number 1- "Consumers" within a biome are: plants,omnivores,herbivores, carnivores please choose more than one. Question number 2- Animals which only consume other animals are called
Choose... herbivors,carnivors or omnivors Question nember 3
Animals which consume only plants are called choose.... herbivors,carnivors or omnivors
Answer:
1. omnivores, herbivores and carnivores
2. carnivores
3. herbivores
What is the proportion of saved disposable income called?
savings rate
human capital
savings
physical capital
Answer:
saving
Explanation:
hope this help;)
In the context of norms, in a society, the customs for correct dress and social manners are known as:
Answer:
Value
Explanation:
In the context of norms, value is the customs for correct dress & social manners.
4. You can add information here discussing various Native Americans and settlers.
Because the players are prevented from cooperating, each player in a prisoners' dilemma game has a dominant strategy that leaves ________ than if they could cooperate.
Because the players are prevented from cooperating, the dominant strategy leaves them both worse off than if they could cooperate.
In the prisoners dilemma, both of the players are separated from each other. There is usually no communication. They must have to make a choice on if to cooperate or not on their own.
The two choices that they usually have is either to cooperate or for them to defect. By defecting, a player would be wanting to maximize her options. But when they both cooperate, they both win.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/22597804?referrer=searchResults
While sitting on a public bus, Angel uses his backpack as a(n) __________ by placing it in the seat next to him.
Angel uses his backpack as a territorial marker.
Territorial marking is a term to refer to a series of instinctive behaviors of animals and humans to delimit and defend their territory.
Generally, mammals usually mark the limits of their territory using body fluids such as urine and stools so that when another mammal passes through this place they recognize the smell and move away from that territory.
In the case of humans, territoriality is not like in animals. However, instinctively we have certain territorial behaviors like Angel's on the bus because by putting his suitcase on the seat next to him he is marking the place as his to prevent someone from invading him.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:
A) territorial marker
B) regulator
C) backchannel cue
D) adapter
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/1747694
What would attract a group of humans to settle in east Asia
How did Americans change their environment in order to improve transportation?
Answer:
These advances in transport helped drive settlement in the western regions of North America. They were also essential to the nation's industrialization. ... Busy transport links increased the growth of cities. The transportation system helped to build an industrial economy on a national scale.
Explanation:
hope this helps
what is the best food in the work
I will give high points for that
AHHAHAHA
Everyone's answer will differ from one another but mine is PIZZA!!!
Explanation:
Pizza, Burger are the best food in the work.
hope this helps.
Which of these ecosystem regions experiences all four seasonal climates?
A.
desert
B.
grassland
C.
deciduous forest
D.
temperate rain forest
Answer:
C. Deciduous forest
Explanation:
Let me know if im correct.
The ________ hypothesis is the ideology common in the United States that people get the outcomes they deserve. Group of answer choices
Answer: Just-world hypothesis
The Just world hypothesis is the ideology common in the United States that people get the outcomes they deserve.
What is Hypothesis?A hypothesis is an explanation provided for a phenomenon. The scientific method demands that a hypothesis be testable in order for it to be considered a scientific hypothesis. Scientists often establish scientific hypotheses on past data that cannot be adequately explained by existing scientific ideas.
The fair world hypothesis holds that individuals get what they deserve and deserve what they get in life. This notion may be a contributing factor to the basic attribution mistake, which is the propensity to exaggerate dispositional reasons of an event while underestimating situational factors.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the just-world hypothesis is a popular ideology, or worldview, in the United States. The just-world theory holds that individuals get what they deserve.
Learn more about the Hypothesis here:
https://brainly.com/question/17173491
#SPJ2
What are the major theories of the origin of the state? Which do you find most convincing and why?
Answer:
there are four theories, evolutionary, force divine right, and social contract.
The major theories of the origin of the state
evolutionary theory force Theory divine right theory social contract theoryThe most reasonable argument for the birth of the state theory is the social contract hypothesis, which holds that a contract was established between the state and its citizens, resulting in a peaceful society.
What is the importance of the origin of the state?The social contract that gave birth to the government stipulated that it would be governed by "universal consent" and on the basis of democratic representation. The protection of people's lives and the property was one of the contract's goals.
According to this view, an agreement was made between a person and society or among the members of the society, which led to the creation of the society or state.
Learn more about theories of the origin, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14491319
#SPJ2
paano naiiba ang buod sa abstrak at sintesis?
Answer:
hm?
Can you elaborate please?
Answer:
I don't know sorry
