Answer:
Police took a drug-sniffing dog to Jardines’ front porch, where the dog gave a positive alert for narcotics. Based on the alert, the officers obtained a warrant for a search, which revealed marijuana plants; Jardines was charged with trafficking in cannabis. The Supreme Court of Florida approved the trial court’s decision to suppress the evidence, holding that the officers had engaged in a Fourth Amendment search unsupported by probable cause
explain the three of the government?
Answer: There are three portions in the U.S government. The Legislative government makes laws, The executive government carries out laws, and the Judicial branch evaluates laws.
Explanation:
according to the comparative negligence defense, a plaintiff's recovery is reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage of the plaintiff's fault in the case. true false
It is a true statement that in according to the comparative negligence defense, a plaintiff's recovery is reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage of the plaintiff's fault in the case.
What does a comparative negligence defense hold?A comparative negligence, also known as non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, refers to a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.
When defense are asserted, the factfinder (jury) must decide the degree to which the plaintiff's negligence and the combined negligence of all other relevant actors all contributed to cause the plaintiff's damage.
Read more about comparative negligence
brainly.com/question/28535877
#SPJ1
Which of the following includes a consumer's right to truthful advertising?
Right to be heard
Right to be informed
Right to safety and service
Right to consumer education
Answer: right to be informed
Explanation: got it right on law studies exam
what is a purpose of the parol evidence rule? multiple choice to restrict oral evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form. to restrict written evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form. to restrict hearsay from being admitted that supports or contradicts an agreement in its written form. to restrict oral and written evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form. to restrict evidence from being admitted that substantially contradicts an agreement in its written form.
The purpose of the Parol evidence rule is To restrict oral evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form.
The parol evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that regulates the types of evidence parties to a contract dispute can submit when attempting to ascertain the precise terms of a contract. The rule also forbids parties who have reduced their agreement to a final written instrument from later bringing other evidence, such the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as proof of a different intent regarding the contract's provisions. A written contract cannot be changed by using extrinsic evidence, according to the rule. The word "parol" comes from the Anglo-Norman French word parol, which means "word of mouth" or "verbal" and was used in the Middle Ages to refer to oral arguments in court cases.
Learn more about Parol evidence rule, here
https://brainly.com/question/29554644
#SPJ4
Theft of which vehicle would be classified as a motor vehicle theft?
O motorboat
O snowmobile
O farm tractor
O construction crane
a(n) is an alternative to posting bail by which the defendant may gain pretrial release.
A release on recognizance is an alternative to posting bail by which the defendant may gain pretrial release.
What is Pretrial release?
Pretrial release decisions serve several reasons, including ensuring that persons accused of crimes receive due process, protecting victims, witnesses, and the public from threats, danger, and interference, and preserving the fairness of the legal system by securing defendants for trial. A defendant's release on personal recognisance or an unsecured appearance bond, release with a condition or set of conditions, temporary detention, or detention in accordance with these Standards are all options that the judge or judicial officer may choose from. The law supports the defendant's release while the charges are being decided. The harsh and repressive nature of depriving defendants of their freedom while they await trial makes it difficult for them to defend themselves and, in many cases, deprives their families of them.To know more about Pretrial release visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20447804
#SPJ4
a contract is a(n) if there is a written or oral expression of intent by the parties to enter into a legally binding agreement
A contract is an express contract if there is a written or oral expression of intent by the parties to enter into a legally binding agreement.
The terms by which the parties agree to be bound are stated either orally, in writing, or in a combination of both, at the time the exchange of promises is made.
The express agreement need not be formal or written. It simply calls for the parties to state their intentions in writing. Example: Someone explicitly offers to sell another individual a widget.
When the other person says she will buy it, she accepts the deal. Contrary to implied agreements, express contracts are simpler to uphold. Simply because the majority of them are written down and have been jointly signed.
To learn more about express contract
https://brainly.com/question/19908088
#SPJ4
Laws that enforce segregation and deny african americans legal equality are called.
Answer: the correct answer is The Jim Crow Laws
Explanation:
The Jim Crow Laws were enacted after the Civil War by the Southern States to impose racial segregation and discrimination against black people.
How does the Tinker vs Des Moines affect students rights?.
The Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and that school officials could not censor student speech unless it interfered with the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court ruled that students' right to wear them was protected by the First Amendment.
Tinker v. Des Moines is widely regarded as a watershed moment for students' free speech rights at school. Apply it to a current scenario in which students stage a school walkout to protest a new dress code that prohibits clothing with messages.Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) remains the leading K-12 First Amendment decision, serving as the standard against which the vast majority of public student free-expression cases are judged.To know more about effect of Tinker versus Des Moines refer:
https://brainly.com/question/12402873
#SPJ4
What is full bench in court?.
a court where the necessary number of judges are present, or all of them. also known as a complete bench.
A three-judge bench is what?According to the 2013 Supreme Court Rules, each matter must be considered by the division bench, a two-judge panel chosen by the Chief Justice of India. To hear cases of greater significance, the Chief of India may also convene a full bench of three judges or a constitutional bench of five or more justices.
How big is a bench of judges?Every other case shall be heard by a Bench of two Judges, unless otherwise provided by law, by these rules, or by an order of the Chief Justice. 11.
To know more about bench court visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
When referring to the judge, the term "bench" refers to the seat in the courtroom where the judge sits. The second circuit bench, or "complete bench," which refers to all the judges of a court, is one example of how it can be used to describe all the judges of a specific court.
What is a full bench hearing?A court of law sitting with a larger than usual number of judges is referred to as a full court (less formally, a full bench). The Chief Justice of India is granted the power to name benches as part of his administrative responsibilities in accordance with the Supreme Court Rules. The Chief Justice of India has the power to select benches and designate specific judges to handle particular matters. The term's historical origins are related to the fact that judges used to preside over courts while seated on long benches or chairs that were either freestanding or against a wall. The bench is typically an elevated desk area where the judge can see and be seen by everyone else in the courtroom.
To know more about bench visit:
brainly.com/question/29885434
#SPJ4
What percentage of states must ratify an amendment for it to be added to the constitution?.
Three fourth of the states must must ratify an amendment for it to be added to the constitution.
An amendment must be ratified by the legislature of three-quarters of the states, or by ratifying conventions held in three-quarters of the states, as specified by Congress. This process has only been used once in American history, with the ratification of the 21st Amendment in 1933.
As soon as 3/4th of the States ratify a proposed amendment, it becomes a part of the Constitution (38 of 50 States). The OFR creates an official declaration for the Archivist to verify that the amendment is legal and has been incorporated into the Constitution once it confirms that it has obtained the necessary quantity of authenticated ratification documents.
To know more about Ratification:
brainly.com/question/23842955
#SPJ4
Some promises will be enforced as contracts where the offeree relied on a material promise and changed his position to his detriment
true or false
Some promises will be enforced as contracts where the offeree relied on a material promise and cannot change his position to his detriment. Thus, the given statement is false.
What type of contract is a promise?Bilateral contracts are those where each party makes a promise in return for the other's promise, whereas unilateral contracts are those where one party makes a promise and the other executes an act. These verbal or written pledges must be binding under the law.
A contract, however, is enforceable in a court of law. There are no legal ramifications for breaking a promise the same way there are for breaching a contract, however, persons of integrity and high moral character try to uphold pledges wherever feasible.
Learn more about the promise, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13668698
#SPJ1
what information could not be provided by a criminal profiler
The Criminal profiler cannot state whether a certain criminal committed the crime.
A criminal profile only provides a general description of the sort of individual who may have committed the crime. It does not refer to a specific person who happens to meet the characteristics. As a result,
Who is a criminal profiler?It must be noted that offender profiling, also known as criminal profiling, is an investigative approach used by law enforcement organizations to identify potential suspects.
It has also been used by investigators to connect crimes that may have been perpetrated by the same offender.
Learn more about criminal profiler:
https://brainly.com/question/12000532
#SPJ1
What did the 3 Progressive presidents have in common?.
During this time, Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson served as the three progressive presidents. These presidents worked to advance the nation's political, social, and economic systems.
The only person to hold both of these positions was William Howard Taft, who was elected the 27th President of the United States (1909–1913) and then the tenth Chief Justice of the United States (1921–1930). He established a postal savings system, established the Interstate Commerce Commission, approved the first tariff reform since 1897, and brought over 75 antitrust cases to court, far more than "trust-buster" Theodore Roosevelt did. William Howard Taft was an indecisive leader and an unproductive president, especially in light of the successful administrations of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. He supported an income tax modification and authorized corporation and inheritance taxes to raise money for the government. He agreed to the proposal calling for senators to be elected directly. He also backed the Children's Bureau, which assisted in ending child labour and enhancing family health care.
Learn more about William Howard Taft here
https://brainly.com/question/26288982
#SPJ4
Why would the number of law enforcement officers be decreasing in major cities such as New York and Detroit?
the rise in private security officers being hired by corporations
people moving out of these cities
decreasing budgets mean less manpower and technology
less interest in police work as a career
Explanation:
because the crime in the area is lower
Answer:
The Detroit Police Department has lost 223 sworn officers since January, an average of about 28 per month. With four months remaining.
Explanation:
hope dis helps
