Consider the following quadratic equation: 25x2=36 Using the standard form ax2+bx+c=0 of the given quadratic equation, factor the left hand side of the equation into two linear factors.

Answer:

Maths keeps one mentally active. The total surface of a hemisphere = 3(pi)r^2. So if the radius = 10 cm, then the TSA = 3(pi)r^2 = 300(pi) = 942.8571429 sq cm.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps you :)

Answer:

The total surface of a hemisphere = 3(pi)r^2.

So if the radius = 10 cm, then the TSA = 3(pi)r^2 = 300(pi) = 942.8571429 sq cm.

Answer:

= ( $72.756, $110.804)

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval (a,b) = ( $72.756, $110.804)

Critical value at 90% confidence = 1.645

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence interval can be defined as a range of values so defined that there is a specified probability that the value of a parameter lies within it.

The confidence interval of a statistical data can be written as.

x+/-zr/√n

Given that;

Mean x = $91.78

Standard deviation r = $23.13

Number of samples n = 4

Confidence interval = 90%

Using the z table;

z(α=0.05) = 1.645

Critical value at 90% confidence = 1.645

Substituting the values we have;

$91.78+/-1.645($23.13/√4)

$91.78+/-1.645($11.565)

$91.78+/-$19.024425

$91.78+/-$19.024

= ( $72.756, $110.804)

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval (a,b) = ( $72.756, $110.804)

Answer:

a) The standard deviation of the annual income σₓ = 2045

b)

The calculated value Z = 0.608 < 1.645 at 10 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is greater than $32,000

c)

The calculated value Z = 1.0977 < 1.96 at 5 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is  equal to  $33,000

d)

95% of confidence intervals of the Average annual income

(26 ,746.8 ,34, 763.2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given size of the sample 'n' =100

mean of the sample x⁻ =  $30,755

The Standard deviation = $20,450

a)

The standard deviation of the annual income σₓ = [tex]\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

                                               = [tex]\frac{20,450}{\sqrt{100} }= 2045[/tex]

b)

Given mean of the Population μ =  $32,000

Given size of the sample 'n' =100

mean of the sample x⁻ =  $30,755

The Standard deviation ( σ)= $20,450

Null Hypothesis:- H₀: μ > $32,000

Alternative Hypothesis:H₁: μ <  $32,000

Level of significance α = 0.10

[tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{30755-32000 }{\frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]

Z= |-0.608| = 0.608

The calculated value Z = 0.608 < 1.645 at 10 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is  greater than $32,000

c)

Given mean of the Population μ =  $33,000

Given size of the sample 'n' =100

mean of the sample x⁻ =  $30,755

The Standard deviation ( σ)= $20,450

Null Hypothesis:- H₀: μ =  $33,000

Alternative Hypothesis:H₁: μ ≠ $33,000

Level of significance α = 0.05

[tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{30755-33000 }{\frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]

Z = -1.0977

|Z|= |-1.0977| = 1.0977

The 95% of z -value = 1.96

The calculated value Z = 1.0977 < 1.96 at 5 % level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

The average annual income is equal to  $33,000

d)

95% of confidence intervals is determined by

[tex](x^{-} - 1.96 \frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } , x^{-} + 1.96 \frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} })[/tex]

[tex](30755 - 1.96 \frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} } , 30755 +1.96 \frac{20450}{\sqrt{100} })[/tex]

( 30 755 - 4008.2 , 30 755 +4008.2)

95% of confidence intervals of the Average annual income

(26 ,746.8 ,34, 763.2)

Answer:

  2082.12 was the total invested

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the amount invested at 14%. Then the amount invested at 12% was (x-580). The total accumulated amount was ...

  112%(x -580) +114%(x) = 2358.60

  2.26x -649.60 = 2358.60

  2.26x = 3008.20 . . . add 649.60

  x = 1331.06 . . . . . . divide by 2.26

  x -580 = 751.06

The total invested was 1331.06 +751.06 = 2082.12 cedis.

__

Check

The investment at 12% was 751.06, so the accumulated amount of that investment was 751.06×1.12 = 841.19.

The investment at 14% was 1331.06, so the accumulated amount of that investment as 1331.06×1.14 = 1517.41.

The accumulated total amount was 841.19 +1517.41 = 2358.60.

Answer:

C ; A

Step-by-step explanation:

Question 30:

Perimeter is the sum of all sides.

Perimeter for a recatngle can be found with the formula:

2(L+W)

Length is 7

Width is 4

Plug our values in.

2(7+4)

2(11)

22

Answer C

Question 31:

Circumference of a circle can be found with the formula:

πd.

Diameter of the given circle is 6.

Plug it in

6π

Round π to 3.14

6(3.14)

18.84

Answer A

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: y = 11 - x / -6

Step-by-step explanation:

X - 6y = 11

Since we are solving for y, we need to isolate the variable.

Move x to the other side of the equation.

- 6y = 11 - x

Now divide bith sides by -6 to cancel out -6y and get the variable y

-6y/ -6 = 11 - x/ -6

y = 11 - x / -6

Im not sure if it was solving for y, or if it was solve for x if y = 11

(a)

[tex] \sqrt[5]{ {x}^{3} } [/tex]

(b)

[tex] \sqrt[8]{x} [/tex]

(c)

[tex] \sqrt[3]{ {x}^{5} } [/tex]

(d)

[tex] \sqrt{ {x}^{3} } [/tex]

Answer:

u=6

Step-by-step explanation:

One rule in algebra is what you do to one side, you do it to other side. So if you multiply a number in one side, multiply the same number in other side. Here in this question, you are trying to find the value of the variable u. Variable is called so because the value of it varies depending on different question. Here u is going to be a constant number which when multipled by 3 and then subtracted by 3 equals 15.

So first step is we try to get constants on one side. So we add 3 on both sides to get rid of 3 on left.

3u - 3 + 3= 15+3

3u= 18

Now we divide by 3 on both sides to get u by itself.

3u/3 = 18/3

u= 6

Answer: -116 is value of discriminant

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally's rational functions that have vertical asymptotes, even trig functions (which, like the tangent function, are often rational).

If the given function is the ratio of two functions, polynomial or otherwise, the graph of the given function has an asymptote at any x value for which the denominator is zero.  Example:  y = tan x = (sin x) / (cos x) has vertical asysmptotes at π/2, 3π/2, and so on, because the denominator cos x is zero for those angles.

Answer:

x = 5/v

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for x:

2 v x - 5 = 5

Add 5 to both sides:

2 v x = 10

Divide both sides by 2 v:

Answer: x = 5/v

Answer:

I'd say start with "Add 5 to both sides"

Step-by-step explanation:

VX +VX-5 = 5

Add 5 to both sides

2VX=10

Divide both sides by 2

VX=5

Divide both sides by V

X=[tex]\frac{5}{V}[/tex]

Answer:

Y = 0

X= 1/2

Z = -1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

4x-y+ 2z=-1

-x+y-3z= 1

-x+2y + 5z = 2

Solving simultenously

Y= 4x + 2z -1

Y =1+ 3z+ x

Y =x/2 -( 5z/2) - 1

Equating y will give two equations

3x-z = 2

3x + 11z = -4

Subtracting the equations

-12z =6

Z= -1/2

Substituting z

3x +1/2 = 2

3x = 3/2

X= 1/2

Substituting x and z to find y in

-x+y-3z= 1

-1/2 + y +3/2 = 1

Y = 1-1

Y = 0

Answer: b) is answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Zero

Step-by-step explanation:

Because when you replace x with a number and solve it it doesn't have the same answer as x2 − 9 = 0.

I hope this helped. I am sorry if you get this wrong.

Multiply her savings by the percent spent:

850 x 0.35 = 297.50

The tv cost $297.50

Answer:

the price of TV is = 297.5$

Step-by-step explanation:

all money= 850$

purchased money= 35% of all money ==> 850 ( 35%) = 297.5$

Answer:

800 eggs

Step-by-step explanation:

You would first thing about the starting numbers, Then look at the number 100 and multiply by 8. This would give you 800. This means that you will need 800 eggs to serve 100 people.

Brainliest is greatly appreciated

Answered by: Skylar

6/8/2020

9:59 AM (Eastern Time)

Answer:

the answer is 12.5 i know because i divided 100 by 8 and got 12.5 then multiply then got 100

Step-by-step explanation:

got it right just did the test

Answer:

360 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-5.7° C

Step-by-step explanation:

-2.7 °C (degrees Celsius) - 3 °C (degrees Celsius) = -5.7° C

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(x + k) is a factor of f(x)

x+k=0 => x= -k;    -k is a root of f(x)

=> f(-k)=0

[tex](x + k) is a factor of f(x)x+k=0 = > x= -k; -k is a root of f(x)= > f(-k)=0[/tex]

So the correct option is B.fl-k)=0.

The cube root function is f(x)=3√x f ( x ) = x 3 . A radical function is a function that is defined by a radical expression. The following are examples of rational functions: f(x)=√2x4−5 f ( x ) = 2 x 4 − 5 ; g(x)=3√4x−7 g ( x ) = 4 x − 7 3 ; h(x)=7√−8x2+4 h ( x ) = − 8 x 2 + 4 7 .

The root function is used to find a single solution to a single function with a single unknown. In later sections, we will discuss finding all the solutions to a polynomial function. We will also discuss solving multiple equations with multiple unknowns. For now, we will focus on using the root function.

Learn more about root function here: https://brainly.com/question/13136492

#SPJ2

Answer:

Half-life of the goo is 49.5 minutes

[tex]G(t)= 300e^{-0.014t}[/tex]

191.7 grams of goo will remain after 32 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]M_0\,,\,M_f[/tex] denotes initial and final mass.

[tex]M_0=300\,\,grams\,,\,M_f=37.5\,\,grams[/tex]

According to exponential decay,

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt[/tex]

Here, t denotes time and k denotes decay constant.

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt\\\ln \left ( \frac{37.5}{300} \right )=-k(150)\\-2.079=-k(150)\\k=\frac{2.079}{150}=0.014[/tex]

So, half-life of the goo in minutes is calculated as follows:

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{50}{100} \right )=-kt\\\ln \left ( \frac{50}{100} \right )=-(0.014)t\\t=\frac{-0.693}{-0.014}=49.5\,\,minutes[/tex]

Half-life of the goo is 49.5 minutes

[tex]\ln \left ( \frac{M_f}{M_0} \right )=-kt\Rightarrow M_f=M_0e^{-kt}[/tex]

So,

[tex]G(t)= M_f=M_0e^{-kt}[/tex]

Put [tex]M_0=300\,\,grams\,,\,k=0.014[/tex]

[tex]G(t)= 300e^{-0.014t}[/tex]

Put t = 32 minutes

[tex]G(32)= 300e^{-0.014(32)}=300e^{-0.448}=191.7\,\,grams[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]=3\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]2\frac{1}{2}+1\frac{1}{3}\\\mathrm{Add\:whole\:numbers}\:2+1:\quad 3\\\mathrm{Combine\:fractions}\:\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}:\quad \frac{5}{6}\\=3\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

Answer:

a) H0: [tex]\sigma = 1.34[/tex]

H1: [tex]\sigma \neq 1.34[/tex]

b) [tex] df = n-1= 10-1=9[/tex]

And the critical values with [tex]\alpha/2=0.005[/tex] on each tail are:

[tex] \chi_{\alpha/2}= 1.735, \chi_{1-\alpha/2}= 23.589[/tex]

c) [tex] t=(10-1) [\frac{1.186}{1.34}]^2 =7.05[/tex]

d) For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n = 10 sample size

s= 1.186 the sample deviation

[tex]\sigma_o =1.34[/tex] the value that we want to test

[tex]p_v [/tex] represent the p value for the test

t represent the statistic  (chi square test)

[tex]\alpha=0.01[/tex] significance level

Part a

On this case we want to test if the true deviation is 1,34 or no, so the system of hypothesis are:

H0: [tex]\sigma = 1.34[/tex]

H1: [tex]\sigma \neq 1.34[/tex]

The statistic is given by:

[tex] t=(n-1) [\frac{s}{\sigma_o}]^2 [/tex]

Part b

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1= 10-1=9[/tex]

And the critical values with [tex]\alpha/2=0.005[/tex] on each tail are:

[tex] \chi_{\alpha/2}= 1.735, \chi_{1-\alpha/2}= 23.589[/tex]

Part c

Replacing the info we got:

[tex] t=(10-1) [\frac{1.186}{1.34}]^2 =7.05[/tex]

Part d

For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34

Answer:

a = 29.3785

Step-by-step explanation:

Given ∠A = 46° and ∠B = 105°

we know that ∠A +∠B+∠C = 180°

                       46° + 105° +∠C = 180°

                      ∠C = 180 - 46 -105

                     ∠ C = 29°

By using sine rule

[tex]\frac{a}{sin A} = \frac{b}{Sin B} = \frac{c}{Sin C} = 2 R[/tex]

[tex]\frac{a}{sin A} = \frac{c}{Sin C}[/tex]

Given ∠A = 46° and  ∠ C = 29° and c = 19.8

[tex]\frac{a}{sin 46} = \frac{19.8}{Sin 29}[/tex]

on cross multiplication , we get

[tex]a = \frac{19.8 X sin 46}{Sin 29}[/tex]

a = 29.3785

Answer:

c) Yes, because the p-value = 0.0172

Step-by-step explanation:

The following table is obtained:

Categories       Observed(fo)        Expected (fe)        (fo-fe)²/fe

NW Oregon        3109           4357*0.727=3167.539       1.082

SW Oregon        902             4357*0.207=901.899           0

Central Oregon    244          4357*0.048=209.136         5.812

Eastern Oregon    102           4357*0.028=121.996         3.277

Sum =                    4357        4357                                   10.171

(1) Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H0​:p1​=0.727,p2​=0.207,p3​=0.048,p4​=0.028

Ha​: Some of the population proportions differ from the values stated in the null hypothesis

This corresponds to a Chi-Square test for Goodness of Fit.

(2) Rejection Region

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05, the number of degrees of freedom is df=4−1=3, so then the rejection region for this test is R={χ2:χ2>7.815}.

(3) Test Statistics

The Chi-Squared statistic is computed as follows:

[tex]X^2=\sum^n_{i=1}\frac{(O_i-E_i)^2}{y} \\\\= 1.082+0+5.812 +3.277 = 10.171[/tex]

(4) Decision about the null hypothesis

Since it is observed that

[tex]X^2 = 10.171 > X_c^2 = 7.815[/tex]

it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.

(5) Conclusion

It is concluded that the null hypothesis H_o is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that some of the population proportions differ from those stated in the null hypothesis, at the α=0.05 significance level.

Answer:

76 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the perimeter, add up all of the side lengths.

18 cm + 26 cm + 32 cm = 76 cm

I hope this helps :))

Answer:

1, 5, 25, 125, ...

3, 6, 12, 24, ...

Step-by-step explanation:

1, 5, 25, 125, ...

3, 6, 9, 12,...

3, 6, 12, 24, ...

3, 9, 81, 6, 561, ...

10, 20, 40, 60, ...

Answer: 0.007

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose that you have a ticket.

We have 3 prizes, and 300 tickets.

After the first tiket is drawn, someone win a prize, so now we have 299 tikets left and 2 prizes left.

Then, for the next draw, you have p = 1/299 of wining a prize.

If you did not win there, the probability for the third price is p = 1/298 (because there are 2 less tickets now)

Then the probability of winning at least one prize is:

P = 1/299 + 1/298 = 0.007

Answer:

sale prices = $252

Step-by-step explanation: 280 - (280 x 10%) = 280 - 28 = $252

Answer:

$189

Step-by-step explanation:

10% of 210 = 21

210 - 21  = 189

Answer:

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders (P-value = 0.004).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2> 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (single group), of size n1=450 has a proportion of p1=0.1489.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=67/450=0.1489[/tex]

The sample 2 (married group), of size n2=925 has a proportion of p2=0.1005.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=93/925=0.1005[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.0483.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.1489-0.1005=0.0483[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{67.005+93}{450+925}=\dfrac{160}{1375}=0.1164[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.1164*0.8836}{450}+\dfrac{0.1164*0.8836}{925}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0002+0.0001}=\sqrt{0.0003}=0.0184[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.0483-0}{0.0184}=\dfrac{0.0483}{0.0184}=2.62[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=P(z>2.62)=0.004[/tex]

As the P-value (0.004) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders.