Describe the Tanzimat reforms (took place from 1839-1876) that followed Mahumd II's reforms.

The congressional elections of 1866 were significant because they marked a turning point in the struggle for Reconstruction in the aftermath of the American Civil War.

The congressional elections of 1866 were the first major elections to be held after the end of the Civil War. At the time, the United States was grappling with the aftermath of the conflict and trying to rebuild the country and establish a new order in the South. The Republican Party, which had been formed in the 1850s in opposition to slavery, had become the dominant political force in the North and was committed to ensuring that the rights of newly freed slaves were protected and that the South was fully integrated into the Union.

The elections of 1866 were seen as a referendum on the policies of Reconstruction that had been put in place by President Andrew Johnson, who had succeeded Abraham Lincoln after his assassination in 1865.

To know more about congressional elections , click here.

https://brainly.com/question/20708526

#SPJ4

The Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of the United States government came from the Virginia Plan.

The Virginia Plan was a proposal for a new government framework presented at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by Virginia delegates James Madison and Edmund Randolph. The plan called for a strong national government with a bicameral legislature, with representation based on population, and an executive and judiciary branch to be appointed by the legislature. The Virginia Plan served as the basis for much of the drafting of the United States Constitution, and its principles continue to shape the functioning of the federal government today.

The Virginia Plan was put forward by James Madison and Edmund Randolph, among others, and it called for a strong national government with a bicameral legislature, a judiciary, and an executive branch. The plan was designed to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which had created a weak federal government unable to address the needs of the newly formed United States.

These three branches were intended to provide a system of checks and balances on each other, with the Legislative branch having the power to make laws, the Judiciary branch having the power to interpret laws, and the Executive branch having the power to enforce laws. This system was designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful and to protect the rights and freedoms of the American people. Ultimately, the Virginia Plan served as the basis for the Constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1788 and remains the supreme law of the land today.

To know more about the Virginia Plan visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10922511

#SPJ4

The debates over American expansionism in the 1840s and 1890s were similar in some respects, but they also differed in several significant ways.

Similarities:

1. Manifest Destiny: Both eras were marked by a belief in Manifest Destiny, the idea that it was America's destiny to expand its territory and influence. This belief was especially strong in the 1840s, when America was still a young and growing nation, but it persisted into the 1890s as well.

2. Economic interests: In both eras, economic interests played a significant role in the debates over expansionism. In the 1840s, many Americans saw expansion as a way to open up new markets for American goods and to acquire more land for settlement. Similarly, in the 1890s, expansion was seen as a way to secure new sources of raw materials and to open up new markets for American goods.

3. National security: National security was also a concern in both eras. In the 1840s, some Americans argued that expansion was necessary to secure the country's borders and to protect it from foreign threats. Similarly, in the 1890s, there were concerns about America's ability to compete with other world powers, and expansion was seen as a way to enhance American power and influence.

Differences:

1. Scope of expansion: The scope of expansion was much greater in the 1890s than it was in the 1840s. In the 1840s, America's expansion was focused primarily on the western territories and on the annexation of Texas. In contrast, in the 1890s, America's expansion was global in nature, with the acquisition of territories such as Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines.

2. Imperialism: The debates over expansion in the 1890s were characterized by a growing sense of American imperialism. Many Americans saw expansion as a way to spread American values and civilization to other parts of the world, and there was a growing belief in the superiority of American culture and institutions. This was a marked contrast to the debates of the 1840s, which were more focused on the practical benefits of expansion.

3. Opposition: There was more opposition to expansionism in the 1890s than there was in the 1840s. In the 1840s, expansion was seen as a natural and inevitable part of America's growth, and there was little opposition to it. However, by the 1890s, some Americans had begun to question the wisdom of expansion, and there were concerns about the impact that it would have on American society and values.

Overall, the debates over American expansionism in the 1840s and 1890s were similar in some respects, but they also differed in significant ways. Both eras were marked by a belief in Manifest Destiny and a focus on economic interests and national security, but the scope of expansion, the rise of imperialism, and the growing opposition to expansion were all key differences between the two eras.

Learn more about American expansionism: https://brainly.com/question/10583021

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:The two-state solution is a proposal to resolve the long-standing conflict between Israel and Palestine by creating two independent states, one for Israelis and one for Palestinians, living side by side in peace and security. The proposed borders would be based on the pre-1967 lines, with land swaps to account for Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

The idea behind the two-state solution is to create a peaceful coexistence between the two groups and to end the violence that has plagued the region for decades. The solution requires both parties to make difficult compromises, such as recognizing each other's right to exist, sharing resources, and creating a fair and just system of governance.

The prospects for success of the two-state solution are uncertain, as both sides have deeply entrenched positions and there are numerous obstacles to achieving a lasting peace. The settlement issue remains a major obstacle, as Israeli settlements continue to expand into Palestinian territory, making it difficult to establish contiguous borders for a future Palestinian state. In addition, both sides have competing claims to Jerusalem, which has been a flashpoint for violence.

Despite these challenges, many continue to believe that the two-state solution is the best way forward, as it provides a path for Israelis and Palestinians to live side by side in peace and security. However, achieving this goal will require sustained effort and a commitment from both sides to make the necessary compromises for peace.

The territorial changes shown in the southwestern region of the map most directly resulted from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ended the Mexican-American War in 1848.

The treaty ceded a vast amount of land, including modern-day California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma, to the United States.

This region became known as the Mexican Cession. As a result of the treaty, the United States became a transcontinental nation, and the acquisition of this land opened up new opportunities for settlement, trade, and expansion westward.

However, the treaty also marked the displacement and marginalization of indigenous populations, including the Apache, Navajo, and Hopi, and the imposition of American laws and values on Mexican and Spanish-speaking communities in the region.

To know more about territorial changes visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15985938

#SPJ11

The Union campaign to advance from Atlanta, Georgia and to capture Savannah, Georgia is better known as the March to the Sea.

The campaign was led by Union General William Tecumseh Sherman during the American Civil War in 1864. After capturing Atlanta, Sherman proposed to cut off the Confederacy's supplies and communication lines by marching from Atlanta to Savannah, a distance of about 300 miles.

The march began on November 15, 1864, and lasted for about a month. Sherman's army destroyed everything in its path, including crops, railroads, and buildings, to demoralize the Confederacy and hasten the end of the war. The capture of Savannah was a significant victory for the Union and marked the beginning of the end of the Confederacy.

Learn more about American Civil War

https://brainly.com/question/769992

#SPJ4

The only two African cities with a subway system are Cairo, Egypt, and Algiers, Algeria.

Cairo's metro system, established in 1987, is the oldest in Africa, featuring three lines and covering a total distance of 89 kilometers.

Meanwhile, the Algiers Metro, which began operations in 2011, has a single line spanning approximately 18 kilometers. Both subway systems play a crucial role in providing efficient and affordable public transportation for the urban population, reducing traffic congestion, and promoting economic development within their respective cities.

These metros showcase the potential benefits of investing in modern infrastructure in African cities.

To know more about Subway system visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20354766

#SPJ11

Answer:In 1957, President Eisenhower sent Congress a proposal for civil rights legislation. The result was the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the first civil rights legislation since Reconstruction.

Explanation:

Hilter/Germany annexed Austria in 1938 out of fears that the election was not going to turn to his favor.

The Nazis broke both the Treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain by annexing Austria. These agreements specifically prohibited the union of Austria and Germany. Nazi contempt for the post-World War I European order was evident in the Anschluss.

The Nazis were not punished by the other European nations for breaking international agreements. An important act of appeasement was their acceptance of the Anschluss. Adolf Hitler was able to carry out his expansionist policies unabated thanks to this.

Austria was altered by the Anschluss. Austria vanished from the face of the earth almost immediately. The nazification of all facets of Austrian life was carried out in the days, weeks, and months that followed by German and Austrian Nazis.

To know more about Hitler, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12778492

#SPJ4

In Texas v. Johnson, the SCOTUS ruled that flag burning is protected free speech.

The correct option is A.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in the 1989 case of Texas v. Johnson that flag burning is protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The 5-4 decision held that flag burning was a form of symbolic speech, and that the government could not punish someone for expressing their opinion through such an act. The majority opinion, written by Justice William Brennan, argued that the government could not punish a person for the content of their speech, even if it was offensive.

The four dissenting justices argued that the flag was a symbol of national unity, and that desecrating it was not protected under the First Amendment. Ultimately, the Court held that the right to free speech was more important than the government’s interest in preserving the flag as a symbol.

The correct option is A.

To know more about Supreme Court, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ1

By attempting to compel ethnic Turkmen in the Xinxiang region to accept Chinese immigration and dominance, the People's Republic of China has been stoking enmity. This statement is true.

The statement presents a controversial and sensitive issue related to the ethnic tensions and human rights situation in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) in China. The region is home to a variety of ethnic groups, including the Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and Turkmen.

The Chinese government has been accused of committing human rights abuses against the Uyghur population, including mass detention, forced labor, and religious and cultural suppression. The Chinese authorities have also implemented policies to encourage the Han Chinese majority to migrate to the region, which has resulted in a demographic shift and increased tensions with the local communities.

The statement mentions the Turkmen minority, who have also faced discrimination and pressure to assimilate into the dominant Han Chinese culture. Reports suggest that the Chinese government has implemented policies to suppress the Turkmen language, culture, and religion and encourage intermarriage with Han Chinese.

To learn more about Chinese immigration

https://brainly.com/question/1405626

#SPJ4

The siege of Vicksburg during the American Civil War affected the balance of power because it was a key Confederate stronghold along the Mississippi River.

Capturing Vicksburg would give the Union control of the entire river, splitting the Confederacy in two and allowing for easier transportation and communication between Union troops in the west and east.

The siege lasted for 47 days and was a turning point in the war. The Union Army, under the command of General Ulysses S. Grant, successfully cut off supplies to the city and bombarded it until it surrendered on July 4, 1863.

This victory gave the Union a strategic advantage, boosted morale, and allowed them to gain more control of the southern states. The fall of Vicksburg also led to the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared all slaves in Confederate states to be free.

To know more about Mississippi River visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17349650

#SPJ11

Kennedy and Johnson shared many of the same goals, such as improving the economy and promoting equality, Johnson was more successful in implementing large-scale social programs and had a more aggressive approach to foreign policy.

Lyndon B. Johnson and John F. Kennedy were both presidents of the United States, but their policies were different in several ways. Here are a few key differences:

Civil Rights: Kennedy is often remembered for his support of the Civil Rights movement, but it was under Johnson's administration that the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964. Johnson took a more proactive stance on Civil Rights than Kennedy, who was initially hesitant to push too hard on the issue.

Social Programs: Johnson's "Great Society" programs, which aimed to reduce poverty and improve access to healthcare, education, and housing, were more expansive than Kennedy's efforts in the same areas. Johnson's programs included Medicare, Medicaid, and the War on Poverty.

Foreign Policy: Kennedy's foreign policy was focused on containing communism, while Johnson escalated U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. Kennedy had sent advisors to Vietnam, but Johnson sent combat troops and greatly expanded U.S. military involvement.

Leadership Style: Kennedy was known for his charisma and charm, while Johnson was known for his tough, no-nonsense approach. Johnson was also more experienced in Congress and had a better understanding of how to navigate political alliances and get legislation passed.

To know more about  Kennedy  here

https://brainly.com/question/13721861

#SPJ1

France was the most populated country in Western Europe in the eighteenth century.

In a country in Western Europe, with an estimated population of around 25 million people. This was followed by Britain, with a population of around 8 million, and Spain, with a population of around 7 million.

While the Netherlands and Austria were also significant powers in Europe during this period, they had smaller populations than France, Britain, and Spain. The Netherlands had a population of around 2 million, while Austria had a population of around 6 million. France's large population was due in part to its favorable geography and climate, as well as its robust agricultural sector.

To know more about France, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/28333194

#SPJ4

Answer:

What the people in the street wanted to do with the members of the provisional government held by the Red Guards was to kill them or put them on trial.

The reason for this was that they blamed the provisional government for continuing the war,

Explanation:

The provisional government that took power after the February Revolution of 1917 in Russia was unpopular and ineffective. It faced many challenges, such as the ongoing World War I, the demands for land reform from the peasants, and the social unrest among the workers. What the people in the street wanted to do with the members of the provisional government held by the Red Guards was to kill them or put them on trial. The Red Guards were armed workers and soldiers who supported the Bolsheviks, a radical socialist party that led the October Revolution of 1917 against the provisional government.  The reason for this was that they blamed the provisional government for continuing the war, the Bolsheviks promised to end the war, distribute land, and create a workers' state. Instead, they seized power in a coup and established a new government under Lenin.

The correct implication of Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s argument in "The Imperial Presidency" (1973) is that the presidency had become too powerful and had exceeded its constitutional limits.

Schlesinger argued that the modern presidency, especially since Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration, had amassed unprecedented power and authority, including the ability to make and execute policies without proper checks and balances from Congress or the judiciary. This had created a dangerous imbalance of power that threatened American democracy.

We can also involve a more detailed analysis of Schlesinger's arguments and evidence, as well as a discussion of the historical and political context in which the book was written.

To learn more about The Imperial Presidency visit:

brainly.com/question/11463171

#SPJ11

Yes, the history and tradition associated with a brand can greatly impact its memorability and success. The Los Angeles Dodgers, for example, have a storied history dating back to their founding in Brooklyn in 1883, which has helped establish them as one of the most recognizable and beloved baseball teams in the world.

By building a strong brand identity rooted in their rich history, the Dodgers have been able to establish a deep connection with fans and create a lasting legacy that extends far beyond the baseball diamond. So, when it comes to creating a successful brand name, leveraging a strong history and tradition can be a key characteristic to consider.

The Los Angeles Dodgers is indeed an example of a good brand name, as its easy-to-remember nature is attributed to its rich history and long-standing tradition. The connection between the brand and its history helps create a strong identity, making it easily recognizable and memorable for consumers.

To know more about traditional history visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2085488

#SPJ11

The Apollo 11 mission concluded exactly eight days, three hours, 18 minutes and 35 seconds after launch

Explanation:

 After the French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years' War, the British Empire emerged as the dominant power in North America. However, the war had been costly, and Britain was facing a significant debt. To raise revenue and consolidate control over the colonies, the British government enacted a series of measures that affected the colonies. These measures included the Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765, and the Townshend Acts of 1767.

One of the most significant measures enacted by the British after the French and Indian War was the Proclamation of 1763. The purpose of this proclamation was to limit the westward expansion of the American colonists beyond the Appalachian Mountains. The British government believed that by restricting colonists from moving westward, they could reduce conflicts with Native American tribes and prevent costly wars.

In conclusion, the purpose of the Proclamation of 1763 was to limit the westward expansion of the American colonists, consolidate British control over the colonies, and reduce conflicts with Native American tribes. However, the proclamation was met with significant opposition from colonists who saw it as a violation of their rights and an attempt by the British government to limit their freedom.

To know more about French  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/25311986

#SPJ11

In an effort to bring an end to the Vietnam War, President Lyndon B. Johnson announced a temporary halt to the bombing of North Vietnam on Christmas Day in 1965. This was known as the "Christmas bombing pause."

The cessation of bombing was intended to persuade the North Vietnamese authorities to hold peace talks with the US.

Unfortunately, Johnson's invitation received no response from the North Vietnamese government. Instead, they strengthened their military position in South Vietnam during the pause.

Soon after the start of the new year, the bombing resumed, and the war lasted for several more years.

The Christmas bombing pause did not result in a long-lasting peace agreement, and the war deteriorated in the years that followed, sparking more widespread opposition to the conflict in the United States.

For such more question on Vietnam War:

https://brainly.com/question/12918391

#SPJ11

True, the first British colonies, located in Virginia and New England, were founded by different groups for different reasons, but settlers in both colonies faced similar early struggles in establishing their communities.

In Virginia, the Jamestown colony was established by the Virginia Company in 1607 with the primary goal of finding gold and establishing trade opportunities. In contrast, the New England colonies, such as Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay, were founded by religious separatists seeking freedom from persecution in the 1620s.

Despite their different motivations, settlers in both Virginia and New England faced similar struggles in the early years of their establishment. These struggles included:

1. Harsh weather conditions: Settlers in both colonies experienced extreme weather, with harsh winters and unpredictable seasons that impacted crop growth and food supplies.

2. Lack of experience: Many settlers were unprepared for the realities of colonial life, lacking the necessary skills and knowledge for farming, hunting, and building.

3. Conflict with Native Americans: Settlers in both regions encountered conflict with the indigenous peoples who were already living in those areas. This led to wars, trade disputes, and general mistrust between the groups.

4. Disease: Disease was a significant issue for both colonies, with settlers bringing new illnesses that decimated Native American populations and suffering from unfamiliar diseases themselves.

5. Food shortages: In the early years, both colonies struggled with providing enough food for their populations, leading to starvation and the need for additional support from England.

In conclusion, while the first British colonies in Virginia and New England were founded for different reasons, the settlers faced similar challenges in establishing their communities, including harsh weather, lack of experience, conflict with Native Americans, disease, and food shortages.

To know more about British colonies refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19068421#

#SPJ11

Promissory estoppel does not require the presence of consideration to be established. However, other elements such as a promise made by one party, a reliance on this promise by another party, and a resulting detriment to the relying party must be established.

A written agreement is not required to establish promissory estoppel. Promissory estoppel can be established by words, conduct, or any other type of evidence that indicates a promise was made and relied upon.

Promissory estoppel does not require any particular formalities. It does not require any kind of writing, consideration, or a contract. In addition, it does not require the promise to be made in exchange for a benefit. It is enough that a person makes a promise that induces the other party to act or change their position in reliance upon it. The promise must be clear and unambiguous, and the party relying on the promise must have suffered a detriment in the form of an action or forbearance.

To know more about Promissory estoppel, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29651556

#SPJ4

Soviet dissident writers began resorting to samizdat in the mid-1950s.

After the death of Soviet leader Joseph Stalin in 1953, the Soviet Union experienced a period of relative liberalization under Nikita Khrushchev. However, censorship and repression of dissenting voices persisted. In the mid-1950s, writers who were unable to publish their works through official Soviet publication venues began to resort to self-publishing via samizdat.

The term "samizdat" comes from the Russian words sam ("self") and izdatelstvo ("publishing"), and refers to the practice of creating multiple copies of a manuscript using carbon paper and typewriters, and distributing them through informal channels. Samizdat became an important means of circulating dissident literature and ideas in the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

To know more about Soviet , click here.

https://brainly.com/question/9641081

#SPJ4

Answer: D, He had refused to allow U.N. inspectors access to Iraq’s weapons manufacturing facilities.

Explanation: Chat GPT told me

It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later.

The German administration in East and South West Africa experienced widespread rebellion against their rule in 1904 and 1907 due to the oppressive and exploitative nature of German colonial rule.

The Germans were accused of forcing the locals to work in labor camps and mines, imposing high taxes, and failing to provide basic services such as education and healthcare.

Furthermore, the German military presence was seen as intrusive and oppressive. These rebellions had a significant impact on the final years of German rule in the colonies, as they led to a loss of German control over many areas and hampered the ability of the German administration to impose its policies. This, in turn, led to a decrease in German influence in the colonies and ultimately contributed to the eventual end of German rule in the colonies.

To know more about German administration, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16019860

#SPJ4

The war that was fought between the British houses of Lancaster and York for the throne of England is known as the War of the Roses.

Individual investors benefit the most from the tax advantage of preferred stocks. The dividends paid on preferred stocks are generally taxed at a lower rate than the dividends paid on common stocks.

This tax advantage is most useful to individual investors who have a higher tax rate on their income. In contrast, government entities, corporations, and mutual funds may have different tax rates and structures that affect their benefits from investing in preferred stocks. It was a series of battles that took place between 1455 and 1487, and was fought between two rival branches of the royal House of Plantagenet: the House of Lancaster, represented by a red rose, and the House of York, represented by a white rose.

Learn more about houses of Lancaster here:

https://brainly.com/question/13752450

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation: