Which historic court case determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation necessary to carry out the powers granted to them?.
McCulloch v. Maryland is the high court case.
The court ruled that states lacked the power to levy taxes the federal government and that the federal possessed the power and authority to establish a federal bank. The Federal Government won the case, and Marshall came to the conclusion that "the power to tax implies the right to destroy."
The Court ruled unanimously that Maryland also couldn't charge national government tools used to carry out its constitutional duties and that Congress seemed to have the authority to establish the bank.
This decision established that the Constitution's intended goal of creating a powerful national government was achieved and that state cannot interfere with the authority vested in the federal government.
To know more about the court case, visit the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2022555
#SPJ4
What is a document called that is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court?.
the Pleading document is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court.
What is a pleading document?Pleadings are indeed the authorized legal contracts that plaintiffs must submit to the court in order to begin a case. Frequent aspects of pleadings include assertions of claim and defense. These kinds of documents include specifics regarding your unique claim or defense and the proof backing it. The pleadings should identify the key issues in the case for the court and the other parties. This article explains the function of pleadings and the information they include. The pleadings contain all significant factual accusations that the parties will have to substantiate at trial. Keep in mind that the opposing party's pleadings must contain any truth or information that might surprise the other party or undermine that party's case.
To know more about the pleading document visit:- brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
Select the elements that do not represent corpus delicti and click submit.
The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:
causationconcurrenceWhat is corpus delicti?This refers to the legal term that has to do with the facts and circumstances that make up a crime.
Hence, we can see that The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:
causationconcurrenceThis is because causation and concurrence are not valid proof that a crime was committed and guilt being established and thus is not a representation of corpus delicti.
In criminal law, the facts and circumstances are determined by several factors...
Read more about corpus delicti here:
https://brainly.com/question/17636247
#SPJ1
Alice is texting while driving and hits barney with her vehicle as he is crossing the road. If barney sues alice for negligence in a trial court, barney would be the defendant. True or false?.
Answer:
False, Alice would be the defendant
Explanation:
Alice is the one getting sued, therefore she is the defendant
Daphne contracts with speedy builders inc. To construct a six-foot fence around her yard. Daphne’s neighbor rando is delighted because daphne’s fence will border the north side of his property. This means he can enclose the rest of his property for a much lower price. Before construction begins, however, speedy builders receives an offer for another, more lucrative project, and refuses to perform the contract with daphne. Who can sue speedy builders for breach of contract?.
According to law Daphne has the power to sue Speedy Builders for breach of contract.
A legal claim and category of civil wrong known as "breach of contract" refers to when a number of the parties to a contract refuse to perform their obligations under the terms of the agreement or interfere with the performance of the other party. A party commits a breach when it disobeys one or more of its obligations under a contract, whether completely or partially. It may also convey its intent to breach the agreement or otherwise show that it is unable to fulfill its obligations. When a contract is broken, the party who broke the agreement is responsible for paying the injured party's damages
Learn more about breach of contract here:
brainly.com/question/28101555
#SPJ4
List 3 Arguments that support your viewpoint on Gun Control.
Answer:
Use these top three arguments the next time you are asked to defend the need for gun control.
01
of 03
Gun Ownership Leads to Homicides
gun control rally
Protesters with One Million Moms for Gun Control, a gun control group formed in the wake of the Newtown, Connecticut massacre, rally in New York City. Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Gun-rights advocates and other extremists sometimes behave as if every attempt to create sane and logical regulations on guns is a fruitless, fascist assault on their freedom, but a quick look at the facts shows a chilling relationship between homicides and gun ownership that shouldn't be so carelessly ignored. The more people that own guns in a region, the more firearm deaths that area will see.
According to a study on this very topic published in the American Journal of Public Health, "For each percentage point increase in gun ownership, the firearm homicide rate increased by 0.9%," (Siegel 2013). This study, which looked at data from three decades for every U.S. state, strongly suggests that the more people that own guns, the more lives will be taken by guns.02
of 03
Fewer Guns Means Fewer Gun Crimes
In the same vein, research shows that gun control restricting household firearm ownership could save lives. Gun control is therefore not only logical, it's necessary.
It's common for gun advocates to claim that the solution to gun violence is to be more heavily armed so that you can defend yourself and others against someone brandishing a weapon. This view is echoed by the popular saying, "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun."
But again, this argument contains no logic. Other countries that have implemented stricter gun ownership regulations than the U.S. have lower homicide rates, and this is no coincidence. Looking at the example that Japan, with its strict firearm control laws and its almost nonexistent national homicide rate, sets, it's clear that fewer guns, not more guns, is the obvious answer ("Japan—Gun Facts, Figures and the Law").03
of 03
You Do NOT Have the Right to Own Any Gun You Want
The Supreme Court ruled in McDonald v. Chicago (2010), a case often cited by gun-rights advocates, that private citizens may own weapons for self-defense but are subject to restrictions on those weapons. Therefore, it's not your right to build and own a nuclear or assault weapon, nor is toting a pistol in your pocket an unfettered natural right. Your right to bear arms is maintained by federal law, but it's not as loose as you might think.
Minors can't buy alcohol and we can't purchase cold medicine right off the shelf because our society aims to protect citizens from drug abuse and trafficking. In the same way, we need to regulate guns even further in order to protect Americans from gun violence. It's inaccurate to claim that unrestricted gun access and ownership is or ever was a constitutional right.
A request for admission can lengthen a trial because the parties have to take the time to prove facts on which they may already agree. True or false?.
Answer:
Explanation:
true
13. Which of the following would NOT be found at an expressway entrance?
O A. Entrance ramp
O B. Acceleration lane
O C. Merge area
O D. HOV lane
Case: Terms of contract - mere representation
Daniel sees an advertisement in a newspaper for a washing machine at a shop for K300.00. He goes to the shop and at the checkout counters says, he accepts their offer for the washing machine to be sold to him for K300.00. However, the shop owner declines to sell the washing machine at this price, saying that unfortunately there was an error in the advertisement. The correct price is K3,000. Is Daniel entitled to demand the shop to sell the washing machine for K300.00?
Daniel has no title to demand the shop sell the washing machine for K300.00 because the advertisement made an untrue statement which is a mere representation.
What is a mere representation?A mere representation in an advertisement is not a contract term.
A mere representation is a pre-contract term, and the shop can further clarify that the misstatement was an innocent mistake, which it had done.
A pre-contract representation does not form a contractual term unless it is a financial contract, where the obligor makes certain assertions about itself.
Daniel knows that washing machines do not normally sell for K300.00 unless they are recycled or old. The advertisement is untrue. It is then either a misrepresentation or a mere representation.
In this case, Daniel was not induced to enter into a contract with the shop but was merely motivated to buy the washing machine based on the unrealistic advertised price. There was no fraudulent misrepresentation.
Thus, Daniel has no title to demand the shop sell the washing machine for K300.00.
Learn more about misrepresentations at https://brainly.com/question/10764300
#SPJ1
II. Does excessive force have the same meaning as deadly force? Explain.
Excessive force and deadly force do not have the same meaning as excessive force is used necessarily by the authority to control some certain situations while deadly force is used unnecessarily to harm people.
Excessive force is used necessarily when specific situations slip out of control and needs to be controlled immediately for the welfare of the common public to restore peace. On the other hand deadly force is the unnecessary use of power by the authority to impose power on common public and to harm them to justify authority. For example using violence on protestants in peaceful protest is use of deadly force.
To know more about excessive power refer to the link below
https://brainly.com/question/14960053
#SPJ9
Daphne contracts with speedy builders inc. To construct a six-foot fence around her yard. Daphne’s neighbor rando is delighted because daphne’s fence will border the north side of his property. This means he can enclose the rest of his property for a much lower price. Before construction begins, however, speedy builders receives an offer for another, more lucrative project, and refuses to perform the contract with daphne. Who can sue speedy builders for breach of contract?.
According to law Daphne has the power to sue Speedy Builders for breach of contract.
A legal claim and category of civil wrong known as "breach of contract" refers to when a number of the parties to a contract refuse to perform their obligations under the terms of the agreement or interfere with the performance of the other party. A party commits a breach when it disobeys one or more of its obligations under a contract, whether completely or partially. It may also convey its intent to breach the agreement or otherwise show that it is unable to fulfill its obligations. When a contract is broken, the party who broke the agreement is responsible for paying the injured party's damages
Learn more about breach of contract here:
brainly.com/question/28101555
#SPJ4
What is a document called that is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court?.
The document is called Pleadings.
What is a Lawsuit?A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.
The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgement will be rendered in their favour, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel an action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.
To know more about Lawsuit, visit
https://brainly.com/question/22194178
#SPJ4
blank is not required for strict liability crimes
The mens rea element is not required for strict liability crimes.
Which of the following may private club not do
In your own words, what are the Functions of privacy? Which one is most important to you and why?
Answer:
freedom
Explanation:
How much of congress must approve an amendment to the u. S. Constitution before it is sent to the states?.
congress must approve two-thirds of an amendment to U. S. Constitution before it is sent to the states.
What is a constitutional amendment?The constitution of a state, institution, or another form of the body may be changed through a constitutional amendment. A current constitution's pertinent provisions are typically changed right away. They can, however, also be included in the constitution as further amendments (codicils), changing the way the government is organized without changing the original language.
The majority of constitutions include tighter specific procedures that must be followed before amendments can become law. Supermajorities in the legislature, direct voter approval in a referendum, or even a combination of two or more unusual procedures are examples of such extreme techniques.
To know more about constitutional amendment visit:- brainly.com/question/699977
#SPJ4
Kj games, in colorado, designs computer games that it markets and sells to customers via the internet. A click-on agreement accompanies every download; no game can be installed on a buyer’s computer if the buyer does not click on the words "i agree" when prompted. The click-on agreement clearly states in capital letters that all disputes will be settled in colorado’s state courts. Buyers of kj’s games are most likely.
If the click-on agreement clearly states in capital letters that all disputes will be settled in Colorado’s state courts. Buyers of KJ’s games are most likely required to file any lawsuits in Colorado.
An online contract known as a "clickwrap agreement" is one that users accept by clicking a button or checking a "I agree" box. The act of clicking takes the place of the act of signing using an electronic signature. Browsewraps and sign-in-wraps are similar agreement types.
The easiest approach for organisations to reduce risk without affecting conversion or customer experience is through clickwrap agreements. A clickwrap agreement is added by businesses to login sites, checkout flows, and signup pages. Although clickwrap agreements are now much more widespread and legally binding in B2B as well, they are considerably more common in B2C businesses where businesses sell their products and services completely online.
To know more about clickwrap agreement refer:
https://brainly.com/question/19635833
#SPJ4
Describe in depth the ways a principal-agent relationship can end.
Answer:
Similarly, the relationship between agent and principal comes to an end when principal or agent becomes insane, for a person of unsound mind cannot contract. 4. Insolvency of the Principal: When the principal is declared as insolvent, the agency is terminated.
Explanation:
Answer:
An agent’s authority can be terminated at any time. If the trust between the agent and the principal has broken down, it is not reasonable to allow the principal to remain at risk in any transactions that the agent might conclude during a period of notice.
Explanation:
Dose this answer it?
Brainliest please
explain why income level appears to be more important than race or ethnicity when it comes to crime trends?
Answer:
People with low income levels won't be able to afford much necessities. This would lead them to depend on other unorthodox methods likes stealing which is a crime.
Explanation:
Suppose john gets arrested in the cougareat for getting a refill on his drink, even though there are no signs that say free refills are not allowed. What aspect of the rule of law does this violate?.
It voilates publicity rule of law
The right of publicity prohibits the unpermitted commercial exploitation of a person's name, likeness, or other easily recognizable characteristics. It grants a person the only authority to provide a license for the use of their name in commercial marketing. The right to publicity is mainly protected by state common or statutory law in the United States. A right to publicity has only been formally recognized by around half of the states. In several states, the legislation against unfair competition safeguards the right to publicity. The right to publicity is supported by legal actions for misappropriation of property or for falsely representing that someone produced or endorsed a product. Check out Unfair competition.
To know more about publicity rule refer to https://brainly.com/question/11549811
#SPJ4
When a plaintiff in a strict liability lawsuit has used a product in a way that is not intended or that the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen, the defendant may assert which defense?.
Strict liability is the defense you may assert.
In terms of products responsibility, irrespective of the defendant's intention, a defendant is liable if the plaintiff can demonstrate that the product is faulty.
Regardless of the steps taken to avoid harm, a defendant who participated in an unusually risky sport will be held held responsible any evidence of negligence—for any personal injuries and damages to property brought on by the action.
To succeed in an absolute liability action, you must first sustain harm. Second, you need to demonstrate that the harm was brought on by the defendant's goods or behavior. You can sue for your losses without having to prove fault as long as their actions caused your damages and the situation falls within strict liability laws.
To know more about liability lawsuit, visit the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28173731
#SPJ4
What u. S. Federal law was enacted as a result of the enron and mci/worldcom accounting scandals that helps protect investors by making corporate disclosures, accounting and auditing more reliable and accurate?.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (or SOX Act) is the U.S Federal law was enacted as a result of the Enron and mci/WorldCom accounting scandals that helps protect investors by making corporate disclosures, accounting and auditing more reliable and accurate.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was signed into law by President Bush on July 30, 2002, in response to the 2001 accounting scandals at Enron and WorldCom.
SOX, named after its sponsors, Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, has four titles that regulate the financial disclosures of public companies and the accounting practices of publicly traded companies and their auditors, in addition to creating specific penalties for committing accounting fraud against shareholders.
The legislation strengthened criminal penalties for fraudulent financial reporting and provided for shareholder lawsuits against executives who commit fraud or violate federal securities laws.
The purpose of the act: The U.S. Federal law that became known as Sarbanes-Oxley resulted from the Enron and WorldCom accounting scandals that occurred in 2000 and 2002 respectively.
The act is made up of eleven sections of law and created new securities legislation with a focus on accuracy, reliability, and transparency within corporations' financial reports.
It also places more responsibility on corporations' auditors to make sure they are meeting their obligations.
Section 302 – Criminal penalties: Section 302 criminalizes acts such as insider trading and securities fraud.With respect to securities fraud, this section provides for a prison sentence of up to 10 years for willfully destroying records, altering documents, and making false statements in any matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States or in any case filed under section 78y.
In connection with that prohibition, Section 302 also prohibits those individuals who are not directors but do manage a company's books and records from falsely certifying those documents.
Section 802 – Corporate Responsibility for Financial Reports:SEC. 802. ENFORCEMENT OF CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTS.
(a) Section 13(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
(b)(2)) is amended by striking or willfully or recklessly fails to make a reasonable effort to determine whether the issuer is in compliance with any provision of this chapter and inserting fails to comply with any provision of this chapter.
To learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act refer to: https://brainly.com/question/27915345
#SPJ4
Why would a state Not have
an intermediate court of
appeals?
Is there a difference in the
liklihood of an appeal.
being heard??
A state does not have an intermediate court of appeals: being heard following states do not have an intermediate appellate court: Delaware.Maine.Montana. different types of cases are dealt with differently throughout an attraction. Civil Case. either side may enchantment the verdict. crook Case. In most states, but, intermediate appellate courts were installed to relieve the workload of the country's highest courtroom with the aid of serving as the courts in which maximum litigants achieve an assessment of destructive choices from trial courts and numerous administrative corporations.
A court of appeals hears challenges to district court decisions from courts placed within its circuit, in addition to appeals from selections of federal administrative corporations. Appellate courts, additionally referred to as the court docket of appeals, are a part of the American judicial system this is accountable for hearing and reviewing appeals from legal cases that have already been heard in a tribulation-degree or other decreased court docket.
The position of the Courts of attraction isn't to offer new trials, but to check the advanced court report (courtroom files and transcripts) to decide if criminal mistakes had been made. To do this, the court docket of Appeals may additionally listen to arguments from each aspect.
Learn more about court of appeals here:
https://brainly.com/question/20302931
#SPJ9
The 30-day letter gives the taxpayer the opportunity to pay the proposed tax adjustment or file a petition in the u. S. District court to hear the case. True or false?.
False. The 30-day letter does not give the taxpayer the opportunity to pay the proposed tax adjustment or file a petition in U. S. District court to hear the case.
What is the proposed tax adjustment?A letter from the IRS or the state board of revenue will typically refer to a proposed individual income tax assessment, which means that based on the evidence at hand, the relevant tax authority believes the taxpayer has not paid the correct amount of tax and is assessing a new amount, which may include penalties and interest.
To know more about the proposed tax adjustment visit:- https://brainly.com/question/27734841
#SPJ4
Discussion Questions: How does current administration's immigration policy impact
economic, security, and humanitarian policy? How was it treated prior to 9/11? Due to the
current policy, what are the challenges that the United States has regarding securing both
the US/Canada and US/Mexico borders? Do you believe the U.S. policy treats illegal
migrants with dignity? How has the COVID pandemic impacted this policy? (LO1.1 & LO1.2)
1. The current administration's immigration policy has impacted the federal government's economic, security, and humanitarian policy by reinforcing national security while failing to marry the economic and humanitarian disasters and benefits of immigration.
2. Before 9/11, immigration was regarded as a humanitarian way of national openness and was never a security concern.
3. The current immigration policy has mandated the United States to create the Department of Home Security, charged with ensuring safe land borders with Canada and Mexico.
4. Following the creation of the Department of Home Security, the dignity accorded to migrants, whether legal or illegal, has been completely lost on the altar of physical and economic security.
5. The COVID pandemic worsened the U.S. immigration policy because it imposed outright border closures. As a result, the closures brought untold hardships to migrants, who were left stranded at the Canada and Mexico borders with humanitarian catastrophes.
What is immigration?Immigration is the international movement of people who leave their countries of origin to reside in another country or become citizens.
Many reasons for immigration include:
Family reunionViolent conflictsEnvironmental factorsEducational purposesEmployment opportunities.Learn more about the United States' current immigration policy at https://brainly.com/question/20544005
#SPJ1
describe the sub field in psychology specifically forensic psychology
Forensic psychology offers troubles related to psychology and regulation. people who work in this branch observe mental standards to legal issues. this will contain analyzing criminal behavior and treatment or running at once inside the courtroom system.
Forensic psychology is every other subfield of psychology that acts as a bridge between two fields; in this situation, the technological know-how of human behavior and regulation. This area can be extraordinarily enticing to those inquisitive about crook psychology in addition to the crook justice machine, however, it's miles regularly glorified in pop culture.
Psychology consists of 4 principal regions: clinical psychology (counseling for intellectual and behavioral health), cognitive psychology (the observation of the intellectual approaches), behavioral psychology (knowledge behavior via distinctive varieties of conditioning), and biopsychology (research on the mind, behavior, and evolution).
Learn more about Forensic psychology here:
https://brainly.com/question/13762870
#SPJ9
The principle of federalism places sovereignty in the federal government.
True
O False
This claim is untrue. According to the federalism principle, the federal government and all state governments have equal authority.
What are the fundamental tenets of federalism?Federalism is a form of government in which two levels of authority share control over the same region. Larger territorial areas are typically governed more broadly by an overarching national government, while local concerns are handled by smaller subdivisions, states, and cities.
What is federalism based on state sovereignty?In American political history, state sovereignty has been a significant topic. The republic's founders created a federal structure that guaranteed the U.S. government's supremacy within the bounds of its delegated jurisdiction while simultaneously safeguarding the sovereign interests of the states.
Learn more about Federalism:
Drivers, pedestrians, and bicycle riders must obey traffic signals except when a officer is directing traffic
What do you believe are TWO important skills/qualities of a Probation Officer and WHY??
Answer:
mldn3bbekhxwhl2hclwcj
The principle of ________ gives the federal government the power to override any state or local law in one particular area of policy.
The principle of preemption gives the federal government the power to override any state or local law in one particular area of policy.
What is preemption?According to the preemption principle, where two legal authorities disagree, the law of the higher legal authority will take precedence.
Preemption might be restricted to a few hundred feet at most. Preemption based on siren noises has the disadvantage that, depending on their direction and proximity to the intersection, they may or may not be recognized. Ambient disturbances, such as horns, cars, and similar sounds, can also make it difficult for them to be recognized.
Preemption types, Preemption claims may or may not occur in two circumstances: "express preemption" and "implied preemption." "Express preemption" happens when Congress uses the words "we hereby preempt" or another similar language in a statute. Federal statutes specifically forbid municipal and state legislation in this situation.
To know more about preemption visit:- https://brainly.com/question/11422283
#SPJ4
