Federalism could be described as the separation of powers that are shared between more than one level of
government. Example: The federal government and the state governments each have and share certain powers.
Select one:
True
O False

Your answer would be the second one about theatre because the sound in the theater that’s what the question is asking , it has to be more clear for audience and loud so when the audience is watching a movie, they hear what the actresses are saying in the movie

hope this helps !

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Chandragupta

Answer:

D the guy above is right

Explanation:

Answer:

b

Explanation:

it was the two most important industries at the time

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

Excessive Income taxes, because by doing speculative stock purchases and other bank things, people didn't have too much money left, and with the drought, some farmers couldn't afford anything or pay any debts they had.

Answer:

Explanation:

Took the test  

Answer: D

Explanation:

All of the above because Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)

Answer:

D. All of the above

Explanation:

France-French Revolution

(1789 - 1799)

War of Spanish Succession

(1701 - 1714)

Louis XIV (1643 to 1715) left France with unresolved problems, massive debts, and growing unrest for his heirs.

The revolution was fought to balance inequalities in French Society.

American people inspired the middle class by throwing off an oppressive government in the 1700s.

Commoners in the Estates-General felt their class was not fairly represented and formed the National Assembly.

After Charles II died, two of the greatest powers in Europe were now both ruled by French Bourbons.

England, Austria, the Dutch Republic, Portugal, and several German and Italian states joined together to prevent the union of the French and Spanish thrones.

Great Britain was the final winner.

England-National Identity

England

Dylan McClanahan

Analysis

Growth and development of National Identity in England

pp.18-23, 24-25, 180-183, 283-288, 289-284, 313-214 ,357-361

Reforms In Medieval England

Trace the growth and development of a National Identity in England, France or Spain

Magna carta

Parliament

Magna Carta

Spain-Muslim Invasion (711)

Visigothic Kingdoms (500 – 700)

North African Berbers conquered the Iberian peninsula – except for Christian areas in the north and west

- Controlled portions of the Iberian peninsula for 760 years

Two Spains – one Christian, one Muslim

- Christian kingdoms – Aragon, Castile, Leon, Navarre, Portugal

- “Al-Andalus” (Muslim kingdom)

- Capital: Cordoba

- Center of learning, art, craftsmanship

- Weakened by internal fighting and Christian offensives

Occupied Spain after the fall of Rome (476)  

Answer:

The Transcontinental Railroad physically bound the west coast to the Union, and also interconnected all Americans, in that travel and transport of goods became more efficient. .This was a goal of Manifest Destiny, the American philosophy that drove westward expansion

Explanation:

Answer:

He was a success in terms of the military, but a failure in terms of ideology and politics.

Explanation:

Answer: It is similiar to babylon

Explanation:  since babylon had one special center (a ziggurat) of it's city where many people came to worship like the Mecca.

Answer:

The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781.

Explanation:

Answer: He was angry at confederacy. Vicksburg was vital to a union victory.

Answer:

We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.

Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.

Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.

Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.

Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.

Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.

Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.

Explanation:

Violence might be tempting to activist because it can give desired result in less time and could make life after it easier. It might be riskier because  violence demands bloodshed.

The role of violence in Activist movements historically has given mixed results, while some movement became successful like Bolshevik Revolution or English Revolution, the other like Indian National Movement were not so much successful because of the role of violence.

For Activist violence is tempting because it is the easier way to attract the interest of the masses, and it could help in making revolution.

But the role of violence in activist movements are always riskier as it can lead to death, bloodshed, and civil unrest.

Learn more about Role of Activists here:

https://brainly.com/question/1565393

The answer is: delivery of electricity

Answer: allowed farmers to share crops

Explanation:

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

A written Consitution and Bill of Rights lists the rights and can be interpreted that protect the people from the government.

Answer:

A written Consitution and Bill of Rights lists the rights and can be interpreted that protect the people from the government

Explanation:

Hope this helped you

Answer: D.

Explanation:

Because they were kind people.

Answer:

The answer would be D I think

I hope it's right :)

Answer:

Opinion

Explanation:

Others might feel that Washington wasn’t the only greatest President in the USA

Answer:

B

Explanation: the north has the indusrtry to Start.

Answer:

Demographic Characteristics

Explanation:

Demographic characteristics include age, ethnicity, and education.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The more public issues that people know about the more that they will be able to bring up those issues with their leaders

Answer:

Women were the last disciples at the cross and the first at the empty tomb. they remained integral to the work of the church in its early centuries.

Explanation:

. Catherine Kroeger scours historical data to compile an impressive collection of stories about noteworthy women in the early church.

One of the best-kept secrets in Christianity is the enormous role that women played in the early church.

Though they leave much unsaid, still, both Christian and secular writers of the time attest many times to the significant involvement of women in the early growth of Christianity.

Celsus, a 2nd-century detractor of the faith, once taunted that the church attracted only “the silly and the mean and the stupid, with women and children.” His contemporary, Bishop Cyprian of Carthage, acknowledged in his Testimonia that “Christian maidens were very numerous” and that it was difficult to find Christian husbands for all of them. These comments give us a picture of a church disproportionately populated by women.

Why? One reason might have been the practice of exposing unwanted female infants—abandoning them to certain death. Christians, of course, repudiated this practice, and thus had more living females.

Also, in the upper echelons of society, women often converted to Christianity while their male relatives remained pagans, lest they lose their senatorial status. This too contributed to the inordinate number of women in the church, particularly upper-class women. Callistus, bishop of Rome c. 220, attempted to resolve the marriage problem by giving women of the senatorial class an ecclesiastical sanction to marry slaves or freedmen—even though Roman law prohibited this.

The ability to interact and exchange ideas across cultures has increased more than ever in the modern period.

Thus, Option C is correct.

Modernism is the word for the artistic movement that evolved in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as a result of the tremendous changes that swept the globe at that time. The Modern Era included the period from the end of the Middle Ages to the middle of the 20th century. A few traits that define the modern era include colonization, industry, scientific advancement, and urbanization.

Democracy rose to prominence as a political system in the modern era, and freedom, rights, and freedoms were formed. The American Revolutionary War and the French Revolution in the late 18th century shook the world with new hopes for liberty and democratic rule.

For more information about the modern era refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/8858796

#SPJ2

Answer:

d: to return to Africa and form a new country

Explanation:

edg2020

Answer:

Based on the quotation, which best describes Garvey’s view on the best way for African Americans to gain “respect and recognition”?

Explanation:

OCT. 2021 EDGE

Answer:

A

Explanation: