Find the slope of the line passing through the points: a. (-4,-7) and (-7,-5) b. (-2,2a) and (3,7a) (-) and (²) C.

Given: The one-to-one functions g and h are defined as follows. To find g¹(-8):To find g¹(-8), we need to find x such that g(x) = -8.  [tex](h - h-¹)(-5) = -24[/tex] is the final answer. Here's how to do it:

Step-by-step answer:

Given function is [tex]g=((-8, 6), (-6, 7). (-1, 1), (0, -8))[/tex]

Let's find[tex]g¹(-8)[/tex]

Now, [tex]g = {(-8, 6), (-6, 7), (-1, 1), (0, -8)}[/tex]

Now, to find [tex]g¹(-8)[/tex], we need to find the value of x such that g(x) = -8.

So, [tex]g(x) = -8[/tex]

If we look at the given set, we have the element (-8, 6) as part of the function g.

So, the value of x such that [tex]g(x) = -8 is -8.[/tex]

Since this is one-to-one function, we can be sure that this value of x is unique. Hence,[tex]g¹(-8) = -8[/tex]

To find h-¹(x):

Given function is h(x) = 3x - 8

Let's find h-¹(x)To find the inverse of the function h(x), we need to interchange x and y and then solve for y in terms of x.

So, x = 3y - 8x + 8 = 3y

(Dividing both sides by 3)y = (x + 8)/3

Therefore,[tex]h-¹(x) = (x + 8)/3[/tex]

Now, let's find [tex](h - h-¹)(-5):(h - h-¹)(-5)[/tex]

[tex]= h(-5) - h-¹(-5)[/tex]

Now, h(-5)

= 3(-5) - 8

[tex]= -23h-¹(-5)[/tex]

= (-5 + 8)/3

= 1

So, [tex](h - h-¹)(-5) = -23 - 1[/tex]

= -24

Hence, [tex](h - h-¹)(-5) = -24[/tex] is the final answer.

To know more about functions visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

Following the order of operations, you can simplify the expressions 7-5 and -5+7 to obtain the result of 2 for both. The order of operations ensures consistent and accurate evaluation of mathematical expressions, maintaining consistency and preventing ambiguity.

Yes, you can simplify the expressions 7-5 and -5+7 using the order of operations.

The order of operations, also known as PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction), provides a set of rules to evaluate mathematical expressions.

Let's break down the expressions step by step:

7-5: According to the order of operations, you start by performing the subtraction. Subtracting 5 from 7 gives you 2. Therefore, 7-5 simplifies to 2.

-5+7: Again, following the order of operations, you perform the addition. Adding -5 and 7 gives you 2. Therefore, -5+7 simplifies to 2 as well.

Both expressions simplify to the same result, which is 2. The order of operations allows you to evaluate expressions consistently and accurately by providing a standardized sequence of steps to follow.

It is important to note that the order of operations ensures that mathematical expressions are evaluated in a predictable manner, regardless of the order in which the operations are written. This helps maintain consistency and prevents ambiguity in mathematical calculations.

In summary, by following the order of operations, you can simplify the expressions 7-5 and -5+7 to obtain the result of 2 for both.

For more such questions on mathematical expressions

https://brainly.com/question/30350742

#SPJ8

Answer:

Largest number

Step-by-step explanation:

In mathematics, a point at which a function's value is greatest. If the value is greater than or equal to all other function values, it is an absolute maximum. If it is merely greater than any nearby point, it is a relative, or local, maximum.

The definite integral of 6.³ (e^-t cos(t), e^-t sin(t))dt from 0 to 0.1776 is approximately equal to (-3.4413, -3.4413).

To evaluate the definite integral, we can split it into two separate integrals, one for each component of the vector function. Let's consider the x-component first:

∫[0, 0.1776] (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt

To evaluate this integral, we can use integration by parts. Let's choose u = 6.³ e^-t and dv = cos(t) dt. This gives us du = -6.³ e^-t dt and v = sin(t).

Applying the integration by parts formula:

∫ u dv = uv - ∫ v du

We have:

∫ (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt = -6.³ e^-t sin(t) - ∫ (-6.³ e^-t sin(t)) dt

Now, let's evaluate the second integral:

∫ (-6.³ e^-t sin(t)) dt

We can again use integration by parts with u = -6.³ e^-t and dv = sin(t) dt. This gives us du = 6.³ e^-t dt and v = -cos(t).

Applying the integration by parts formula:

∫ u dv = uv - ∫ v du

We have:

∫ (-6.³ e^-t sin(t)) dt = -6.³ e^-t (-cos(t)) - ∫ (-6.³ e^-t (-cos(t))) dt

Simplifying further:

∫ (-6.³ e^-t sin(t)) dt = 6.³ e^-t cos(t) - ∫ (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt

Combining the two results:

∫ (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt = -6.³ e^-t sin(t) - 6.³ e^-t cos(t) + ∫ (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt

Simplifying the equation:

2∫ (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt = -6.³ e^-t sin(t) - 6.³ e^-t cos(t)

Dividing both sides by 2:

∫ (6.³ e^-t cos(t)) dt = -3.³ e^-t sin(t) - 3.³ e^-t cos(t)

Now, let's evaluate the y-component of the integral:

∫[0, 0.1776] (6.³ e^-t sin(t)) dt

The process is similar to what we did for the x-component, and we end up with the same result:

∫ (6.³ e^-t sin(t)) dt = -3.³ e^-t sin(t) - 3.³ e^-t cos(t)

Therefore, the definite integral of 6.³ (e^-t cos(t), e^-t sin(t)) dt from 0 to 0.1776 is approximately equal to (-3.4413, -3.4413).

Learn more about integral  here: brainly.com/question/31059545

#SPJ11

To compute the determinants of the matrices A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, and As obtained from Ao through the specified operations, we need to apply the given operations to the matrix Ao and calculate the determinant at each step.

Given:

Ao is a 5 x 5 matrix with det(Ao) = -3.

a) A₁: Obtained from Ao by multiplying the fourth row of Ao by 2.

To compute det(A₁), we need to perform the specified operation on Ao and calculate the determinant.

A₁ = Ao (after multiplying the fourth row by 2)

det(A₁) = 2 * det(Ao) (multiplying a row by a scalar multiplies the determinant by the same scalar)

det(A₁) = 2 * (-3) = -6

b) A₂: Obtained from A₁ by swapping the first and last rows of A₁.

To compute det(A₂), we need to perform the specified operation on A₁ and calculate the determinant.

A₂ = A₁ (after swapping the first and last rows of A₁)

det(A₂) = det(A₁) (swapping rows does not change the determinant)

det(A₂) = -6

c) A₃: Obtained from A₂ by multiplying A₂ by itself.

To compute det(A₃), we need to perform the specified operation on A₂ and calculate the determinant.

A₃ = A₂ * A₂ (multiplying A₂ by itself)

det(A₃) = det(A₂) * det(A₂) (multiplying matrices multiplies their determinants)

det(A₃) = (-6) * (-6) = 36

d) A₄: Obtained from A₃ by replacing the second row with the sum of itself plus 3 times the third row.

To compute det(A₄), we need to perform the specified operation on A₃ and calculate the determinant.

A₄ = A₃ (after replacing the second row with the sum of itself plus 3 times the third row)

det(A₄) = det(A₃) (replacing rows does not change the determinant)

det(A₄) = 36

e) As: Obtained from A₄ by scaling A₄ by the number 2.

To compute det(As), we need to perform the specified operation on A₄ and calculate the determinant.

As = 2 * A₄ (scaling A₄ by 2)

det(As) = 2 * det(A₄) (scaling a matrix multiplies the determinant by the same scalar)

det(As) = 2 * 36 = 72

Therefore, the determinants of the matrices obtained through the given operations are:

det(A₁) = -6,

det(A₂) = -6,

det(A₃) = 36,

det(A₄) = 36,

det(As) = 72.

Learn more about determinant of matrix  here:

https://brainly.com/question/14218479

#SPJ11

The moments are Mᵣ = 10 and Mᵧ = 9, and the center of mass of the system is (xCM, yCM) = (2.5, 2.25).

To find the moments Mᵣ and Mᵧ and the center of mass (xCM, yCM) of the system, we can use the formulas:

Mᵣ = ∑mᵢxᵢ

Mᵧ = ∑mᵢyᵢ

xCM = Mᵣ / (∑mᵢ)

yCM = Mᵧ / (∑mᵢ)

Given that the particles have equal mass m, we can assume m = 1 for simplicity. Let's calculate the moments and the center of mass:

Mᵣ = (11 + 12 + 13 + 14) = 10

Mᵧ = (13 + 11 + 12 + 13) = 9

xCM = Mᵣ / (1 + 1 + 1 + 1) = 10 / 4 = 2.5

yCM = Mᵧ / (1 + 1 + 1 + 1) = 9 / 4 = 2.25

For more information on moments visit: brainly.com/question/31148148

#SPJ11

The correct option is: The graph is centered around 0.

The statement that is NOT a descriptor of a normal distribution of a random variable is "The graph is centered around 0.

"The normal distribution is a symmetric probability distribution. Its curve is bell-shaped and symmetrical around the mean µ. It means that the distribution's mean is located in the center of the curve. Therefore, the statement

"The graph is centered around the mean" is true.

However, the statement that is not a descriptor of a normal distribution of a random variable is "The graph is centered around 0." The standard normal distribution is the only normal distribution that has its mean at zero (0) and its standard deviation at one (1). Hence, the correct option is: The graph is centered around 0.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer: The Laplace transform of a function f(t) is,

L{(t – 4)'u(t)} = [tex]1/s^2[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The Laplace transform of a function is a mathematical operation that changes a time-domain function into its equivalent frequency-domain representation.

The Laplace transform of a function f(t) is denoted by L{f(t)}.

Below are the Laplace transforms of the given functions:

(a) y(t) = 14

Laplace transform of y(t) = 14 is:

L{14} = 14/s

(b) y(t) = 23

Laplace transform of

y(t) = 23+ is:

L{23+} = 23/s

(c) y(t) = sin(2t)

Laplace transform of y(t) = sin(2t) is:

L{sin(2t)} = [tex]2/(s^2+4)[/tex]

(d) y(t) =[tex]e^(-13t)[/tex]

Laplace transform of

y(t) = [tex]e^(-13t)[/tex]is:

[tex]L{e^(-13t)}[/tex] = 1/(s+13)

(e) y(t) = (t – 4)'u(t)

Laplace transform of

y(t) = (t – 4)'u(t) is:

L{(t – 4)'u(t)} = [tex]1/s^2[/tex]

Note: 'u' represents the unit step function.

To know more about mathematical visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27235369

#SPJ11

The value of tan5o + cot o is tan 5o × [1 - √5] which is equal to [tan² 5o - tan 5o] found using the trigonometric identity.

Given that, o be an acute angle and tano + cot 0 = 2

We need to find the value of tan5o + coto o.

To solve this question, we will use the trigonometric identity as below;

tan(α + β) = (tan α + tan β) / (1 - tan α × tan β)

Also, tan(α - β) = (tan α - tan β) / (1 + tan α × tan β)cot α

= 1 / tan α

Putting the values in the given identity we get,

tan(5o + o) = [tan 5o + tan o] / [1 - tan 5o × tan o]

tan(5o - o) = [tan 5o - tan o] / [1 + tan 5o × tan o]

Adding both the identities, we get;

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = 2 × tan 5o / [1 - (tan o × tan 5o)²]

Also, tan o + cot o = 2

Substituting cot o = 1 / tan o in the given equation

⇒ tan o + 1 / tan o = 2

⇒ (tan² o + 1) / tan o = 2

⇒ tan³ o - 2 tan o + 1 = 0

Now, Let us assume x = tan o

Substituting the value of x, we get;

⇒ x³ - 2x + 1 = 0

Using synthetic division, we get;

(x³ - 2x + 1) = (x - 1) (x² + x - 1)

Now, x² + x - 1 = 0 using the quadratic formula, we get;

x = (-1 + √5) / 2 and (-1 - √5) / 2

Here, we know that, o is an acute angle.

Therefore, tan o is positive.

So, x = (-1 + √5) / 2 is not possible.

Hence, we take,

x = (-1 - √5) / 2i.e. tan o = (-1 - √5) / 2

Now, substituting this value in the identity obtained above;

tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = 2 × tan 5o / [1 - (tan o × tan 5o)²]

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = 2 × tan 5o / [1 - ((-1 - √5) / 2 × tan 5o)²]

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = 2 × tan 5o / [1 - (-1 - √5)² / 4 × tan² 5o]

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = 2 × tan 5o / [1 - 3 - 2√5 / 4 × tan² 5o]

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = 2 × tan 5o / [-2 + 2√5 / 4 × tan² 5o]

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = -4 × tan 5o / (-1 + √5)²

Multiplying by (-1 + √5)² in the numerator and denominator

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = -4 × tan 5o × (-1 + √5)² / 4

⇒ tan(5o + o) + tan(5o - o) = tan 5o × [1 - √5]

Know more about the trigonometric identity

https://brainly.com/question/24496175

#SPJ11

Therefore, the probability of getting at least 63 questions correct using both binomial and normal probability distributions are: P(X = 63) = 0.0082 (approx) P(X ≥ 63) = 0 (approx)

The binomial probability distribution is used when there are two possible outcomes, success or failure, in a sequence of independent trials. The binomial probability distribution can be used when the sample size is small (less than 30) and the population size is known.

The formula for binomial probability is: P(X = k) = (nCk) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

where P(X = k) is the probability of getting k successes, n is the total number of trials, k is the number of successes, p is the probability of success and (1-p) is the probability of failure. nCk is the combination of n and k.

Calculation of probability of getting 63 questions correct using binomial probability distribution:

p = probability of getting a question correct = 1/5n = total number of questions = 86k = number of correct answers required = 63P(X = 63) = (nCk) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)= (86C63) * (1/5)^63 * (4/5)^23= 0.0082 (approx)

Normal probability distribution is used when the sample size is large (greater than or equal to 30). It is also used when the population size is unknown. The mean of the normal probability distribution is calculated using the formula:

μ = np

where μ is the mean, n is the total number of trials, and p is the probability of success. The standard deviation is calculated using the formula:

σ = sqrt(np(1-p))

where σ is the standard deviation.

Calculation of mean and standard deviation:

μ = np = 86 * 1/5 = 17.2

σ = sqrt(np(1-p))=

sqrt(86 * 1/5 * 4/5)= 3.01

Calculation of probability of getting 63 questions correct using normal probability distribution:

Using the normal distribution function, we need to find the probability of getting 63 or more questions correct. We can assume a continuity correction factor of 0.5 to include values between two integers.

z = (x - μ + 0.5) / σ= (63 - 17.5 + 0.5) / 3.01= 15.83

The probability of getting 63 or more questions correct is:

P(X ≥ 63) = P(Z ≥ 15.83) = 0 (approx)

Therefore, the probability of getting at least 63 questions correct using both binomial and normal probability distributions are:

P(X = 63) = 0.0082 (approx) P(X ≥ 63) = 0 (approx)

Learn more about Probability: https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Based on the hypothesis test, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the average number of sick days a worker takes per year is less than 5.

To determine if there is enough evidence to support the researcher's claim that the average number of sick days a worker takes per year is less than 5, we can conduct a hypothesis test.

State the hypotheses and identify the claim.

Null hypothesis (H0): The average number of sick days per year is 5.

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The average number of sick days per year is less than 5 (researcher's claim).

Compute the test value.

We can calculate the test value using the formula:

Test value = (Sample Mean - Population Mean) / (Population Standard Deviation / sqrt(Sample Size))

Test value = (4.6 - 5) / (1.2 / sqrt(26))

Test value ≈ -1.75

Find the P-value.

To find the P-value, we can refer to the t-distribution table or use statistical software. Given that the test is one-tailed and the significance level is 0.10 (0.107 rounded to two decimal places), we find that the P-value is greater than 0.10.

Make the decision.

Since the P-value is greater than the significance level of 0.10, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the average number of sick days per year is less than 5.

Summarize the results.

Based on the hypothesis test, we conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the researcher's claim. The average number of sick days per year is not significantly less than 5.

Learn more about hypothesis test

brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ11

The amount of the continuous money flow is approximately $47,371.21.  The correct choice is B. $47,371.21.

To find the amount of continuous money flow, we can use the continuous compound interest formula:

A = P * e^(rt),

where A is the final amount, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, and t is the time.

In this case, the principal amount (P) is $900 per year, the interest rate (r) is 8.5% or 0.085, and the time (t) is 20 years.

Substituting these values into the formula, we have:

A = 900 * e^(0.085 * 20).

Using a calculator or software to evaluate the exponential term, we find:

A ≈ $47,371.21.

Therefore, the amount of the continuous money flow is approximately $47,371.21.

The correct choice is B. $47,371.21.

To learn more about exponent click here:

brainly.com/question/29886441

#SPJ11

To find the mean and standard deviation in the number of errors per page, we can use the given data and apply the formulas for calculating the mean and standard deviation.

Let's denote the number of errors as x and the number of pages as n.

Step 1: Calculate the product of errors and pages for each category:

(0 errors) x (102 pages) = 0

(1 error) x (138 pages) = 138

(2 errors) x (140 pages) = 280

(3 errors) x (79 pages) = 237

(4 errors) x (33 pages) = 132

(5 errors) x (8 pages) = 40

Step 2: Calculate the sum of the products:

∑(x * n) = 0 + 138 + 280 + 237 + 132 + 40 = 827

Step 3: Calculate the total number of pages:

∑n = 102 + 138 + 140 + 79 + 33 + 8 = 500

Step 4: Calculate the mean (μ):

μ = ∑(x * n) / ∑n = 827 / 500 ≈ 1.654

Step 5: Calculate the squared deviations from the mean for each category:

(0 - 1.654)² * 102 = 273.528

(1 - 1.654)² * 138 = 102.786

(2 - 1.654)² * 140 = 102.786

(3 - 1.654)² * 79 = 105.899

(4 - 1.654)² * 33 = 56.986

(5 - 1.654)² * 8 = 16.918

Step 6: Calculate the sum of the squared deviations:

∑(x - μ)² * n = 273.528 + 102.786 + 102.786 + 105.899 + 56.986 + 16.918 = 658.903

Step 7: Calculate the variance (σ²):

σ² = ∑(x - μ)² * n / ∑n = 658.903 / 500 ≈ 1.318

Step 8: Calculate the standard deviation (σ):

σ = √σ² = √1.318 ≈ 1.147

Therefore, the mean number of errors per page is approximately 1.654, and the standard deviation is approximately 1.147.

Learn more about  variance here:

https://brainly.com/question/32159408

#SPJ11

To build the confusion matrix, we compare the actual class labels with the predicted class labels. The confusion matrix is as follows:

markdown

Copy code

         Predicted Class

       |  0  |  1  |

Actual Class|-----|-----|

0 | 3 | 1 |

1 | 2 | 2 |

Based on the confusion matrix, we can calculate the metrics for "Class 1":

Classifier accuracy: (True Positives + True Negatives) / Total = (2 + 3) / 8 = 0.625

Precision: True Positives / (True Positives + False Positives) = 2 / (2 + 1) = 0.667

Recall: True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives) = 2 / (2 + 2) = 0.5

F-score: 2 * (Precision * Recall) / (Precision + Recall) = 2 * (0.667 * 0.5) / (0.667 + 0.5) ≈ 0.571.

In the context of predicting fraudulent transactions, precision and recall are important metrics to evaluate the performance of the classifier.

Precision refers to the proportion of correctly predicted fraudulent transactions out of all the transactions predicted as fraudulent. It focuses on minimizing false positives, which means reducing the instances where a legitimate transaction is wrongly classified as fraudulent. A high precision indicates a low rate of false positives, providing assurance that the predicted fraudulent transactions are indeed likely to be fraudulent. Recall, on the other hand, measures the proportion of correctly predicted fraudulent transactions out of all the actual fraudulent transactions. It aims to minimize false negatives, which means reducing the instances where a fraudulent transaction is incorrectly classified as legitimate. A high recall indicates a low rate of false negatives, ensuring that most fraudulent transactions are detected.

Both precision and recall are important in detecting fraudulent transactions. However, the relative importance may depend on the specific context and goals of the system. In general, a balance between precision and recall is desirable, but the emphasis may vary depending on the consequences of false positives and false negatives. For example, in a fraud detection system, preventing fraudulent transactions (higher precision) may be more critical than potentially flagging some legitimate transactions as fraudulent (lower recall). Ultimately, the choice between precision and recall as the better metric depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the application.

To learn more about confusion matrix click here:

brainly.com/question/31706783

#SPJ11

a) Four-quarter and centered moving averages were computed for the quarterly gasoline sales. b) The average seasonal variable was calculated using the multiplicative model. c) Quarterly forecasts for the next year were made using the multiplicative model.

a) The four-quarter moving average is calculated by taking the average of the gasoline sales for each quarter over the past four years. This provides a smoothed value that helps identify trends over a longer time period. The centered moving average is a similar calculation, but it assigns the average value to the middle quarter of the four, providing a more centered perspective on the data.

b) To calculate the average seasonal variable using the multiplicative model, the gasoline sales for each quarter are divided by the corresponding four-quarter moving average. This helps to identify the seasonal fluctuations or patterns in the data. By averaging the seasonal variables for the four quarters, we can determine the overall average effect of the seasonal patterns on the sales.

c) To forecast quarterly sales for the next year using the multiplicative model, we multiply the seasonal variable for each quarter by the corresponding four-quarter moving average for that quarter. This incorporates the seasonal patterns into the forecasted values, allowing us to estimate the expected sales for each quarter based on historical data.

To learn more about average click here brainly.com/question/31764512

#SPJ11

To prove that the set {ū1, ū2, ū3, ..., ūn} is linearly dependent, we can start by assuming that there exist scalars a1, a2, ..., an (not all zero) such that:

a1 ū1 + a2 ū2 + a3 ū3 + ... + an ūn = 0.

Now, since each ūi is a linear combination of the vectors v1, v2, ..., vn, we can express each ūi as follows:

ū1 = c11v1 + c12v2 + c13v3 + ... + c1nvn,

ū2 = c21v1 + c22v2 + c23v3 + ... + c2nvn,

...

ūn = cn1v1 + cn2v2 + cn3v3 + ... + cnnvn,

where ci1, ci2, ..., cin are scalars for each i.

Substituting these expressions into the assumed equation, we get:

(a1)(c11v1 + c12v2 + c13v3 + ... + c1nvn) + (a2)(c21v1 + c22v2 + c23v3 + ... + c2nvn) + ... + (an)(cn1v1 + cn2v2 + cn3v3 + ... + cnnvn) = 0.

Expanding this equation, we have:

(a1c11v1 + a1c12v2 + a1c13v3 + ... + a1c1nvn) + (a2c21v1 + a2c22v2 + a2c23v3 + ... + a2c2nvn) + ... + (ancn1v1 + ancn2v2 + ancn3v3 + ... + ancnnvn) = 0.

Now, since {v1, v2, v3, ..., vn} are linearly independent, we know that the only way this sum can be equal to zero is if each coefficient is zero. Therefore, we have:

a1c11 = 0,

a1c12 = 0,

a1c13 = 0,

...

a1c1n = 0,

a2c21 = 0,

a2c22 = 0,

a2c23 = 0,

...

a2c2n = 0,

...

an(cn1) = 0,

an(cn2) = 0,

an(cn3) = 0,

...

an(cnn) = 0.

Since ai's are not all zero (as assumed), and {v1, v2, v3, ..., vn} are linearly independent, it follows that ci1, ci2, ..., cin must be zero for each i.

Hence, all the coefficients ci1, ci2, ..., cin are zero, which implies that each ūi is the zero vector. Thus, the set {ū1, ū2, ū3, ..., ūn} is linearly dependent.

To know more about linearly independent visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31328368

#SPJ11

The linear combination of {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} using these scalars is not trivial and equals the zero vector, indicating that {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} is linearly dependent.

To prove that {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} is linearly dependent given that {v₁, v₂, ..., vₙ} are linearly independent vectors in vector space V, we need to show that there exist scalars c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ (not all zero) such that the linear combination of {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} using these scalars equals the zero vector.

Since {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} are each linear combinations of {v₁, v₂, ..., vₙ}, we can express them as:

ū₁ = a₁v₁ + a₂v₂ + ... + aₙvₙ

ū₂ = b₁v₁ + b₂v₂ + ... + bₙvₙ

...

ūₙ = z₁v₁ + z₂v₂ + ... + zₙvₙ

where a₁, a₂, ..., aₙ, b₁, b₂, ..., bₙ, ..., z₁, z₂, ..., zₙ are scalars.

Now, let's consider the linear combination of {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} using scalars c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ:

c₁ū₁ + c₂ū₂ + ... + cₙūₙ

Expanding this expression:

c₁(a₁v₁ + a₂v₂ + ... + aₙvₙ) + c₂(b₁v₁ + b₂v₂ + ... + bₙvₙ) + ... + cₙ(z₁v₁ + z₂v₂ + ... + zₙvₙ)

We can rearrange the terms and factor out the vᵢ vectors:

(v₁(c₁a₁ + c₂b₁ + ... + cₙz₁)) + (v₂(c₁a₂ + c₂b₂ + ... + cₙz₂)) + ... + (vₙ(c₁aₙ + c₂bₙ + ... + cₙzₙ))

Since {v₁, v₂, ..., vₙ} are linearly independent vectors, in order for the linear combination to equal the zero vector, the coefficients multiplying each vᵢ must be zero:

c₁a₁ + c₂b₁ + ... + cₙz₁ = 0

c₁a₂ + c₂b₂ + ... + cₙz₂ = 0

...

c₁aₙ + c₂bₙ + ... + cₙzₙ = 0

This is a system of linear equations with n equations and n variables (c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ). Since {a₁, a₂, ..., aₙ}, {b₁, b₂, ..., bₙ}, ..., {z₁, z₂, ..., zₙ} are given and not all zero, this system of equations has a non-trivial solution, meaning there exist scalars c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ (not all zero) that satisfy the equations.

Therefore, the linear combination of {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} using these scalars is not trivial and equals the zero vector, indicating that {ū₁, ū₂, ..., ūₙ} is linearly dependent.

To know more about linearly independent visit:

brainly.com/question/31328368

#SPJ4

The probability that the restaurant will start making a profit after 3 hours

(a) To find the probability that the restaurant will start making a profit after 3 hours, we need to calculate the cumulative probability of having 50 or more customers arrive in that time. Using the Poisson distribution, we can calculate the probability as follows:

P(X ≥ 50) = 1 - P(X < 50) = 1 - ∑(k=0 to 49) [e^(-10) * (10^k / k!)]

(b) The expected length of time until the restaurant starts making a profit is equal to the reciprocal of the arrival rate, which is 1/10 hour per customer. Therefore, on average, it will take 10 hours for the restaurant to reach the point of making a profit.

(c) To find the probability that a couple (2 people) will arrive within 30 minutes after the 50th customer, we need to calculate the probability of having at least 2 customers arrive in that time interval. Using the Poisson distribution with a rate of 10 customers per hour, we can calculate the probability as follows:

P(X ≥ 2) = 1 - P(X < 2) = 1 - [e^(-10 * 0.5) * (10^0 / 0!) + e^(-10 * 0.5) * (10^1 / 1!)]

These calculations require further numerical computation to obtain the exact probabilities.

To learn more about “probability” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

a) The probability that in a group of 9 couples, at least 6 husbands have a college degree can be calculated using the binomial probability formula.

b) In a group of 24 couples, the expected number of husbands with a college degree is 15.6, and the standard deviation is approximately 2.35.

a) To find the probability that at least 6 husbands have a college degree in a group of 9 couples, we can use the binomial probability formula. Let's denote the probability of a husband having a college degree as p = 0.65 and the number of couples as n = 9.

The probability mass function for the binomial distribution is given by P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k), where X is the number of husbands with a college degree and k is the number of husbands with a college degree.

To find the probability of at least 6 husbands having a college degree, we sum the probabilities of having 6, 7, 8, and 9 husbands with a college degree:

P(X ≥ 6) = P(X = 6) + P(X = 7) + P(X = 8) + P(X = 9)

P(X = k) = C(9, k) * 0.65^k * (1 - 0.65)^(9 - k)

Calculating each term and summing them up will give us the desired probability.

b) To find the expected number of husbands with a college degree in a group of 24 couples, we multiply the probability of a husband having a college degree (p = 0.65) by the number of couples (n = 24):

Expected number = p * n

To find the standard deviation of the number of husbands with a college degree, we use the formula for the standard deviation of a binomial distribution:

Standard deviation = sqrt(n * p * (1 - p))

Plug in the values of n and p to calculate the standard deviation.

Please note that in both parts, we assume that each couple is independent, and the probability of a husband having a college degree is constant across all couples.

To learn more about probability visit : https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The relation is symmetric and antisymmetric. Therefore, the correct option is Cantisyymetric. The given relation is yRx ⇔ y + x = 0. Let x, y, and z be real numbers.

The reflexive relation is a relation R on set A where each element of A is related to itself. The given relation y + x = 0 is not reflexive since there exists real numbers x, y such that y + x ≠ 0.

The symmetric relation is a relation R on set A where for any elements a, b ∈ A, if (a, b) ∈ R then (b, a) ∈ R.The given relation y + x = 0 is symmetric since if (y, x) ∈ R then (x, y) ∈ R.

Antisymmetric relation is a relation R on set A where for any elements a, b ∈ A, if (a, b) ∈ R and (b, a) ∈ R, then a = b. The given relation y + x = 0 is antisymmetric since if (y, x) ∈ R and (x, y) ∈ R, then y = -x.

Transitive relation is a relation R on set A where for any elements a, b, and c ∈ A, if (a, b) ∈ R and (b, c) ∈ R, then (a, c) ∈ R. The given relation y + x = 0 is transitive since if (y, x) ∈ R and (x, z) ∈ R, then (y, z) ∈ R.

Hence, the relation is symmetric and antisymmetric. Therefore, the correct option is Cantisyymetric.

To know more about symmetric relation visit-

brainly.com/question/32523800

#SPJ11

The value(s) of k such that |A| = 0 is k = 4 or k = -2.

Given the matrix A: [tex]`|A| = [1 K 2;—2v 0 -K ; 3 1 -4]`.[/tex]We need to determine the value(s) of k such that |A| = 0. Here is the

To determine the value(s) of k such that |A| = 0, we need to compute the determinant of the matrix A. That is, we have:[tex]|A| = 1 [0 -K;1 -4] - K [-2 0;3 -4] + 2 [-2 0;3 1]= (1)(-4K) - (-K)(6) + (2)(6) - (0)(-6) - (-2)(3)= -4K + 6K + 12 + 0 + 6= 2K + 18[/tex]

To find the value(s) of k such that |A| = 0, we need to solve the equation [tex]2K + 18 = 0. That is:2K + 18 = 0 = > 2K = -18 = > K = -9[/tex]

Thus, the determinant is zero if and only if K = -9. But -9 is not one of the options, so let us substitute -9 into the determinant and simplify.

That is:[tex]|A| = 1 [0 9;1 -4] + 9 [-2 0;3 -4] + 2 [-2 0;3 1]= (1)(-36) - (9)(6) + (2)(15) - (0)(-18) - (-2)(3)= -36 - 54 + 30 + 0 + 6= -54[/tex]

Now, we know that the determinant is not equal to zero when K = -9.

Therefore, we need to find other values of K that make the determinant equal to zero. From the previous computation, we have:[tex]2K + 18 = 0 = > K = -9 + 4*9 = 27orK = -9 - 2*9 = -27[/tex]

Therefore, |A| = 0 when K = 27 or K = -27. Hence, the main answer is k = 4 or k = -2.

The value(s) of k such that |A| = 0 is k = 4 or k = -2. This is the long answer to the question.

To know more about matrix visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

The PDF of W is fW(w) = c(w⁴ - 5w³ + 10w² - 10w + 4).

We are given the joint probability density function (PDF) for random variables X and Y, which is:

fx,y (x, y) = { cx³y², 0 ≤ x, y ≤ 1

0 otherwise

We need to find the PDF of W, where W = max(X,Y). Therefore, we have:

W = max(X,Y) = X if X > Y, and W = Y if Y ≥ X

Let us calculate the probability of the event W ≤ w:

P[W ≤ w] = P[max(X,Y) ≤ w]

When w ≤ 0, P(W ≤ w) = 0. When w > 1, P(W ≤ w) = 1. Hence, we assume 0 < w ≤ 1.

We split the probability into two parts, using the law of total probability:

P[W ≤ w] = P[X ≤ w]P[Y ≤ w] + P[X ≥ w]P[Y ≥ w]

Substituting for the given density function, we have:

P[W ≤ w] = ∫₀ˣ∫₀ˣ cx³y² dxdy + ∫ₓˑ₁∫ₓˑ₁ cx³y² dxdy

Here, when 0 < w ≤ 1:

P[W ≤ w] = c∫₀ˣ x³dx ∫₀ˑ₁ y²dy + c∫ₓˑ₁ x³dx ∫ₓˑ₁ y²dy

P[W ≤ w] = c(w⁵/₅) + c(1-w)⁵ - 2c(w⁵/₅)

Hence, the PDF of W is:

fW(w) = d/dw P[W ≤ w]

fW(w) = c(w⁴ - 5w³ + 10w² - 10w + 4)

Here, 0 < w ≤ 1.

Hence, the PDF of W is fW(w) = c(w⁴ - 5w³ + 10w² - 10w + 4).

To learn more about probability, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer: The Environmental Protection Agency representative can visit 5 factories out of 9 factories in 126 different ways to investigate the pollution.

Therefore, the answer is (C) 126.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the problem, the representative has to visit 5 of the 9 factories.

The number of ways to do this is a combination problem.

Here is the solution:

We can solve this by using the formula for a combination, which is:

$$\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}$$

where n is the total number of items (in this case, 9) and r is the number of items we are choosing (in this case, 5).

Using this formula, we get:

[tex]\frac{9!}{5!(9-5)!}\\=\frac{9!}{5!4!}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{9\times8\times7\times6\times5!}{5!4\times3\times2\times1}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{9\times8\times7\times6}{4\times3\times2\times1}[/tex]

[tex]=126.[/tex]

To know more about Environmental  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21976584

#SPJ11

There are 450 possible codes, 720 possible outcomes for Win, Place, and Show, and 27,405 possible ways to form a committee.

b) For the first digit, there are 9 options (1-9) since 0 is not allowed. The second digit can be any of the 10 digits (0-9), so there are 10 options. The last digit must be an odd number, so there are 5 options (1, 3, 5, 7, 9). The total number of different codes is 9 x 10 x 5 = 450 codes.

c) For a race with ten horses, there are 10 options for the winner, 9 options for the second-place horse, and 8 options for the third-place horse. The total number of different outcomes for Win, Place, and Show is 10 x 9 x 8 = 720 outcomes.

d) To choose four students from a class of 30, the teacher can use combinations. The number of different ways to form a committee is C(30, 4) = 30! / (4! * (30-4)!), which equals 27,405 committee outcomes.

Learn more about odd number here:

brainly.com/question/30189339

#SPJ11

In a Hilbert space, there exists a vector orthogonal to any closed subspace. In a normed space, this may not be the case for finite dimensional subspaces.

(a) The set X consists of all continuous functions on [0,1] that vanish at 0, equipped with the sup norm. The set Y consists of all continuous functions of the form rex with the integral of the product of x and the constant function 1 being equal to 0. It can be shown that Y is a closed proper subspace of X. However, there is no function z in X such that its norm is 1 and its distance to Y is 1. This result can be compared to the fact that in a separable Hilbert space, there always exists a vector with norm 1 that is orthogonal to any closed subspace.

(b) If Y is a finite dimensional proper subspace of a normed space X, then there exists a nonzero x in X that is orthogonal to Y. This follows from the fact that any finite dimensional subspace of a normed space is closed, and hence has a complement that is also closed. Let y1, y2, ..., yn be a basis for Y. Then, any x in X can be written as x = y + z, where y is a linear combination of y1, y2, ..., yn and z is orthogonal to Y. Since ||y|| <= ||x||, we have ||x|| >= ||z||, which implies that dist(X,Y) = ||z||/||x|| <= 1/||z|| <= 1. To obtain the desired result, we can normalize z to obtain a unit vector x/||x|| with dist(X,Y) = 1.

Learn more about integral here:

brainly.com/question/31059545

#SPJ11

The distance between a Banach space X and a subspace Y is defined as the infimum of the distances between any point in X and any point in Y. If Y is a proper subspace of X, then there exists an x in X such that ||x|| = 1 and dist(x, Y) = 1.

(a) X is the Banach space consisting of all functions of C([0,1]) with the sup norm, such that their first values are 0. Therefore, all X members are continuous functions that are 0 at point 0, and their norm is the sup distance from the x-axis on the interval [0,1].

Y is the subspace of X formed by all functions that are of the form rex and satisfy the condition  ∫(0-1)f(x)dx=0.The subspace Y is a proper subspace of X since its dimension is smaller than that of X and does not contain all the members of X.

The distance between two sets X and Y is defined by the formula dist(X, Y) = inf { ||x-y||: x E X, y E Y }. To determine dist(X,Y) in this case, we must calculate ||x-y|| for x in X and y in Y such that ||x|| = ||y|| = 1, and ||x-y|| is as close as possible to 1.The solution to the problem is to prove that no such x exists. (Compare 5.3.) The proof for this involves the fact that, as Y is a closed subspace of X, its orthogonal complement is also closed in X; in other words, Y is a proper subspace of X, but its orthogonal complement Z is also a proper subspace of X. The same approach will not work, however, if X is not a Hilbert space.(b) Suppose Y is a finite-dimensional proper subspace of X.

Then there exists an x E X such that ||x|| = 1 and dist(x, Y) = 1. The vector x will be at a distance of 1 from Y. The proof proceeds by considering two cases:

i) If X is a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, then there exists an orthonormal basis for X.

Using the Gram-Schmidt process, the orthogonal complement of Y can be calculated. It is easy to show that this complement is infinite-dimensional, and therefore its intersection with the unit sphere is non-empty. Choose a vector x from this intersection; then ||x|| = 1 and dist(x, Y) = 1.

ii) If X is not a Hilbert space, then it can be embedded into a Hilbert space H by using the completion process. In other words, there is a Hilbert space H and a continuous linear embedding T : X -> H such that T(X) is dense in H. Let Y' = T(Y) and let x' = T(x).

Since Y' is finite-dimensional, it is a closed subset of H. By part (a) of this problem, there exists a vector y' in Y' such that ||y'|| = 1 and dist(y', Y') = 1. Now set y = T-1(y'). Then y is in Y and ||y|| = 1, and dist(x, Y) <= ||x-y|| = ||T(x)-T(y)|| = ||x'-y'||. Thus we have dist(x, Y) <= ||x'-y'|| < = dist(y', Y') = 1. Hence dist(x, Y) = 1.

Learn more about orthogonal complement here:

brainly.com/question/31500050

#SPJ11

To calculate the probabilities, we need to use the concept of binomial probability.

For a fair coin being tossed 5 times:

(a) Probability of getting five heads:

The probability of getting a head in a single toss is 1/2.

Since each toss is independent, we multiply the probabilities together.

P(Head) = 1/2

P(Tails) = 1/2

P(Five Heads) = P(Head) * P(Head) * P(Head) * P(Head) * P(Head) = [tex](1/2)^5[/tex] = 1/32 ≈ 0.03125

So, the probability of obtaining five heads is approximately 0.03125 or 3.125%.

(b) Probability of getting four heads:

There are five possible positions for the four heads.

P(Four Heads) = (5C4) * P(Head) * P(Head) * P(Head) * P(Head) * P(Tails) = 5 * [tex](1/2)^4[/tex] * (1/2) = 5/32 ≈ 0.15625

So, the probability of obtaining four heads is approximately 0.15625 or 15.625%.

(c) Probability of getting one head:

There are five possible positions for the one head.

P(One Head) = (5C1) * P(Head) * P(Tails) * P(Tails) * P(Tails) * P(Tails) = 5 * (1/2) * [tex](1/2)^4[/tex] = 5/32 ≈ 0.15625

So, the probability of obtaining one head is approximately 0.15625 or 15.625%.

For a fair die being thrown eight times:

(a) Probability of a 6 occurring six times:

The probability of rolling a 6 on a fair die is 1/6.

Since each roll is independent, we multiply the probabilities together.

P(6) = 1/6

P(Not 6) = 1 - P(6) = 5/6

P(Six 6s) = P(6) * P(6) * P(6) * P(6) * P(6) * P(6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) = [tex](1/6)^6 * (5/6)^2[/tex] ≈ 0.000021433

So, the probability of rolling a 6 six times is approximately 0.000021433 or 0.0021433%.

(b) Probability of a 6 never happening:

P(No 6) = P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) * P(Not 6) = [tex](5/6)^8[/tex] ≈ 0.23256

So, the probability of not rolling a 6 at all is approximately 0.23256 or 23.256%.

(c) Probability of an odd number of 6s:

To have an odd number of 6s, we can either have 1, 3, 5, or 7 6s.

P(Odd 6s) = P(One 6) + P(Three 6s) + P(Five 6s) + P(Seven 6s)

[tex]P(One 6) = (8C1) * P(6) * P(Not 6)^7 = 8 * (1/6) * (5/6)^7P(Three 6s) = (8C3) * P(6)^3 * P(Not 6)^5 = 56 * (1/6)^3 * (5/6)^5P(Five 6s) = (8C5) * P(6)^5 * P(Not 6)^3 = 56 * (1/6)^5 * (5/6)^3P(Seven 6s) = (8C7) * P(6)^7 * P(Not 6) = 8 * (1/6)^7 * (5/6)[/tex]

P(Odd 6s) = P(One 6) + P(Three 6s) + P(Five 6s) + P(Seven 6s)

Calculate each term and sum them up to find the final probability.

After performing the calculations, we find that P(Odd 6s) is approximately 0.28806 or 28.806%.

Learn more about binomial probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/12474772

#SPJ11

This is the equation of the indifference curve with a utility level of -1. It is concave and is quasi-concave due to the fact that it is an increasing function. Suppose Pa, P y > 0. Prove that B is a compact set. It's worth noting that the budget set, B, is described as [tex]B={( x, y )|Pₐₓ+Pᵧy≤w}.[/tex]

The new budget set will be a straight line on the y-axis since there is no price for good x. This line is defined by y = w/Pᵧ. Since it is a straight line, it is compact.(d) Explain how you would obtain a solution to the consumer's optimization problem using a diagram.

The consumer's optimization problem can be solved by finding the point where the budget line is tangent to the highest attainable indifference curve on the graph. This point of tangency is the consumer's optimal bundle.

To know more about curve visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32496411

#SPJ11

All the four statements are true.

a) The statement is false. Two graphs can satisfy all the mentioned conditions and still not be isomorphic. Isomorphism requires a one-to-one correspondence between the vertices of the graphs that preserves adjacency and non-adjacency relationships.

b) The statement is true. If a relation R on a set A is transitive, then for any elements a, b, and c in A, if (a, b) and (b, c) are in R, then (a, c) must also be in R. The composition of relations, denoted by R², represents the composition of all possible pairs of elements in R. If R² CR, it means that for any (a, b) in R², if (a, b) is in R, then (a, b) is in R² as well, satisfying the definition of transitivity.

c) The statement is true. If a relation R on a set A is symmetric, it means that for any elements a and b in A, if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) must also be in R. When taking the composition of R with itself (R²), the symmetry property is preserved since for any (a, b) in R², (b, a) will also be in R².

d) The statement is true. If R is an equivalence relation and [a]r ^ [b]r ‡ Ø, it means that [a]r and [b]r are non-empty and intersect. Since R is an equivalence relation, it implies that the equivalence classes form a partition of the set A. If two equivalence classes intersect, it means they are the same equivalence class. Therefore, [a]r = [b]r, as they both belong to the same equivalence class.

To learn more about Intersect - brainly.com/question/13373561

#SPJ11

The given function

D(h)=5e^-0.4h

can be used to determine the milligrams D of a certain drug in a patient's bloodstream h hours after the drug has been given.

We have to find the milligrams of drug that will be present in a patient's bloodstream after 10 hours. Let's calculate the value using the given formula.

D(h)=5e^-0.4hD(10)

= 5e^-0.4(10)D(10)

= 5e^-4D(10)

= 5(0.01832)D(10)

≈ 0.09

The milligrams of drug that will be present in a patient's bloodstream after 10 hours are approximately 0.09 mg.  

To know more about milligrams  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29271037

#SPJ11

The newspaper's claim that the average holiday spending would be $1000 was not supported by the 95% confidence interval.

A 95% confidence interval provides a range of values within which we can be 95% confident that the true population parameter (in this case, the average spending) lies. The confidence interval obtained from the sample data was ($775.50, $874.50).

Since the newspaper's claim of $1000 is outside the range of the confidence interval, it means that the true average spending is unlikely to be $1000. The confidence interval suggests that the average planned spending is more likely to be between $775.50 and $874.50.

In conclusion, based on the provided confidence interval, we do not have sufficient evidence to support the newspaper's claim of $1000 average spending for the holidays.

Learn more about newspaper at https://brainly.com/question/15518363

#SPJ11

The equation of the parabola is y = (1/4)(x - 9.25)²+ 9. The arch is in the shape of a parabola with a span of 360 meters and a maximum height of 30 meters.

The equation of the parabola with directrix x = 0.75 and focus (9.25, 9) can be determined using the standard form of a parabolic equation: y = a(x - h)² + k. Given that the directrix is a vertical line x = 0.75, the vertex of the parabola is located midway between the directrix and the focus, at the point (h, k).

The x-coordinate of the vertex is the average of the directrix and focus x-coordinates, which gives us h = (0.75 + 9.25) / 2 = 5.5. Since the parabola opens upwards, the y-coordinate of the vertex is equal to k, which is 9. The coefficient 'a' can be found by using the distance formula between the focus and the vertex. The distance between (9.25, 9) and (5.5, 9) is 4.75, which is equal to 1/(4a). Solving for 'a', we get a = 1/4. Thus, the equation of the parabola is y = (1/4)(x - 9.25)² + 9.

For the arch, the equation of the parabola can be obtained by considering its span and maximum height. The vertex of the parabola represents the highest point of the arch, which corresponds to the maximum height of 30 meters. Therefore, the vertex of the parabola is at (0, 30). The span of the arch, which is the distance between the leftmost and rightmost points, is 360 meters. Since the arch is symmetric, the x-coordinate of the vertex gives us the midpoint of the span, which is 0. The coefficient 'a' can be found by using the maximum height. The distance between the vertex (0, 30) and any other point on the parabola with a y-coordinate of 24 is 6, which is equal to 1/(4a). Solving for 'a', we get a = 1/24. Thus, the equation of the parabola representing the arch is y = (1/24)x² + 30.To determine the distance from the center at which the height of the arch is 24 meters, we substitute y = 24 into the equation of the parabola and solve for x. Plugging in y = 24 and a = 1/24 into the equation y = (1/24)x² + 30, we get 24 = (1/24)x² + 30. By rearranging the equation, we have (1/24)x² = -6. Simplifying further, we find x² = -144, which does not have a real solution. Hence, the height of 24 meters cannot be achieved by the arch.

Learn more about parabolas

brainly.com/question/11911877

#SPJ11