Help please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Binomial probability states that the probability of x successes on n repeated trials in an experiment which has two possible outcomes can be obtained by

(nCx).(p^x)⋅((1−p)^(n−x))

Where success on an individual trial is represented by p.

In the given question, obtaining heads in a trial is the success whose probability is 1/2.

Probability of 6 heads with 6 trials = (6C6).((1/2)^6).((1/2)^(6–6))

= 1/(2^6)

= 1/64

Answer:

x=3/2,1

Step-by-step explanation:Given

(3x-2)ˆ5-(3x-2)ˆ2=0

(3x-2)ˆ3(3x-2)ˆ2-(3x-2)ˆ2=0

(3x-2)ˆ2{(3x-2)ˆ3-1}=0

(3x-2)ˆ2=0 Or (3x-2)ˆ3-1=0

3x-2=0 Or(3x-2)ˆ3=1

x=3/2 Or 3x-2=1, x=1

Answer:

4/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Just a guess

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is A and not C. equation in form of y=mx+b

so start off by (0,2) and you can see the graph go by 1 x and 1 y.

C=n+2

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

its starting point is 2 up to +2 and it goes up at out by 1 so n also ik this was already answered but i want the brainly points

Answer:

just show the questions i will help

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Since both [tex]np \geq 10[/tex] and [tex]n(1-p) \geq 10[/tex], the necessary conditions are satisfied.

0.9945 = 99.45% probability that at most 85 out of 136 DVDs will work correctly.

Step-by-step explanation:

Test if the normal curve can be used as an approximation to the binomial probability by verifying the necessary conditions.

It is needed that:

[tex]np \geq 10[/tex] and [tex]n(1-p) \geq 10[/tex]

Binomial probability distribution

Probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, with p probability.

Can be approximated to a normal distribution, using the expected value and the standard deviation.

The expected value of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]E(X) = np[/tex]

The standard deviation of the binomial distribution is:

[tex]\sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)}[/tex]

Normal probability distribution

Problems of normally distributed distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

When we are approximating a binomial distribution to a normal one, we have that [tex]\mu = E(X)[/tex], [tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)}[/tex].

Assume the probability that a given DVD will work correctly is 52%.

This means that [tex]p = 0.52[/tex]

136 DVDs

This means that [tex]n = 136[/tex]

Test the conditions:

[tex]np = 136*0.52 = 70.72 \geq 10[/tex]

[tex]n(1-p) = 136*0.48 = 65.28 \geq 10[/tex]

Since both [tex]np \geq 10[/tex] and [tex]n(1-p) \geq 10[/tex], the necessary conditions are satisfied.

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = E(X) = np = 136*0.52 = 70.72[/tex]

[tex]\sigma = \sqrt{V(X)} = \sqrt{np(1-p)} = \sqrt{136*0.52*0.48} = 5.83[/tex]

Consider the probability that at most 85 out of 136 DVDs will work correctly.

Using continuity correction, this is [tex]P(X \leq 85 + 0.5) = P(X \leq 85.5)[/tex], which is the p-value of Z when X = 85.5. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{85.5 - 70.72}{5.83}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.54[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.54[/tex] has a p-value of 0.9945.

0.9945 = 99.45% probability that at most 85 out of 136 DVDs will work correctly.

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

12/4= 3

Each paid $3 but as a fraction 3/12=1/4

Answer:

[tex] \frac{1}{4} [/tex]

Step-by-step

12÷4=3

3/12=1/4-each pay this fraction

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  7.92 years

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to find t such that ...

  3 = 2^(t/5)

where 2^(t/5) is the annual multiplier when doubling time is 5 years.

Taking logs, we have ...

  log(3) = (t/5)log(2)

  t = 5·log(3)/log(2) ≈ 7.92 . . . years

It will take about 7.92 years for the population to triple.

Answer:

0.15y

Step-by-step explanation:

0.2*0.75*y = 0.15y

Answer:

The first droplet will hit the ground after about 1.54 seconds.

The second droplet will hit the ground after about 1.6 seconds.

Thus, the first hits the ground first.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the function:

[tex]y=-16r^2 + 38[/tex]

Which represents the height y in feet of a water droplet t seconds after falling from an icicle.

Part A)

We want to find the time it took for the water droplet to hit the ground.

When it hit the ground, its height y above ground will be zero. Therefore, we can let y = 0 and solve for r:

[tex]0=-16r^2+38[/tex]

Subtract 38 from both sides:

[tex]-38 = -16 r^2[/tex]

Divide:

[tex]\displaystyle r^2 = \frac{38}{16} = \frac{19}{8}[/tex]

And take the principal square root of both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle r= \sqrt{\frac{19}{8}} = \frac{\sqrt{38}}{4} \approx1.54\text{ seconds}[/tex]

So, the first water droplet hits the ground after about 1.54 seconds.

Part B)

We want to determine how long it will take for a water droplet to hit the ground from a height of 41 feet.

From the original equation, if r = 0, then y = 38. So, the initial height was 38 feet.

Then we can modify the function into:

[tex]y= -16r^2 + 41[/tex]

In this case, when r = 0, the starting height y is 41 feet.

Again, let y = 0 and solve for r:

[tex]0 = -16r^2 + 41[/tex]

Isolate:

[tex]\displaystyle r^2 = \frac{41}{16}[/tex]

And take the principal square root of both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle r = \sqrt{\frac{41}{16}} = \frac{\sqrt{41}}{4} \approx 1.6\text{ seconds}[/tex]

So, the second drop will hit the ground after approximately 1.6 seconds.

And in conclusion, the first drop will hit the ground sooner (as expected).

Answer:

Micheal will have 6 logs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Each log will divide into two pieces,so.

3×2= 6

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  7

Step-by-step explanation:

The degree of each term is the sum of the degrees of the variables in it.

Term, Degrees

-5, 0

-5x^2wy^4, x:2, w:1, y:4 -- term degree = 2+1+4 = 7

-y^4x^2, y:4, x:2 -- term degree = 4+2 = 6

-4w^3, w:3 -- term degree = 3

The highest of these is 7, so the degree of this polynomial is 7.

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

32 / 24 = 2x / 12

8 / 6 = x / 6

x = ( 8 x 6 ) / 6

= 8 x 1

x = 8

Answer:

y = 1/3x        y - 0 = 1/3 (x - 0)

Step-by-step explanation:

slope intercept: y = 1/3x

point slope: y - 0 = 1/3 (x - 0)

Hm, interesting inequality.

If you know that it slightly simplifies to [tex]2x\gt14[/tex] then you could go about representing something in real life,

Buying shoes is always done in pairs, if u buy two pairs of shoes you bought 4 shoes. You can only ever buy an even number of shoes which is represented by [tex]2x[/tex].

So you are asking yourself how many pairs you had to buy in order to have more than 14 shoes. The answer is of course, 7 pairs means exactly 14 shoes but since you need more the answer is 8 pairs. Represented by,

[tex]x\gt7=\{8,9,10,\dots,\aleph_0\}[/tex]

assuming [tex]x\in\mathbb{N}[/tex], which is appropriate since you cannot buy negative shoe or [tex]0.43819[/tex] of a shoe pair.

However, if you cannot change the inequality at all, you can use the above paragraph but simply add, you have 3 pairs (6 shoes) of shoes that are indispensable and you want to know the minimum number of shoe pairs you need to buy so that you always have more than 20 shoes.

Notes

[tex]\aleph_0[/tex] is the number of natural numbers [tex]\mathbb{N}[/tex] there are.

[tex]\{\dots\}[/tex] is explicit set notation, ie. which values concretely satisfy the inequality.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

= 2x > 20-6

= 2x > 14

= x > 7... then the answer includes the numbers greater than seven

Answer:

A. The distribution of sample means of the differences will be approximately normal if there are at least 30 years of data in the sample​ and/or if the population of differences in winning times for all years is normal.

Step-by-step explanation:

In other to perform a valid paired test, one of the conditions required is that, data for both groups must be approximately normal. To attain normality, the population distribution for the groups must be normal or based on the central limit theorem, the sample size must be large enough, usually n > 30. Hence, once either of the two conditions are met, the paired sample will be valid.

===========================================================

Explanation:

The given function is

[tex]f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{2x-6}}{x-3}[/tex]

which is the same as writing f(x) = ( sqrt(2x-6) )/(x-3)

The key for now is the square root term. Specifically, the stuff underneath. This stuff is called the radicand.

Recall that the radicand cannot be negative, or else the square root stuff will result in a complex number. Eg: [tex]\sqrt{-4} = 0+2i[/tex]

The question is basically asking: what is the smallest x such that [tex]\sqrt{2x-6}[/tex] is a real number?

Well if we made 2x-6 as small as possible, ie set it equal to 0, then we can find the answer

[tex]2x-6 = 0\\\\2x = 6\\\\x = 6/2\\\\x = 3\\\\[/tex]

I set the radicand equal to 0 because that's as small as the radicand can get (otherwise, we're dipping into negative territory).

So 2x-6 set equal to 0 leads to x = 3.

This means x = 3 produces the smallest radicand (zero) and therefore, it is the smallest allowed x value for that square root term.

But wait, if we tried x = 3 in f(x), then we get...

[tex]f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{2x-6}}{x-3}\\\\f(3) = \frac{\sqrt{2*3-6}}{3-3}\\\\f(3) = \frac{\sqrt{0}}{0}\\\\[/tex]

which isn't good. We cannot have 0 in the denominator. Dividing by zero is not allowed. The result is undefined. It doesn't even lead to a complex number. So we'll need to bump x = 3 up to x = 4. You should find that x = 4 doesn't make the denominator 0.

----------------

In short, we found that x = 3 makes the square root as small as possible while staying a real number, but it causes a division by zero error with f(x) overall. So we bump up to x = 4 instead.

Answer:

-59,844,616

563,576

Step-by-step explanation:

it is very simple bro

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have the same slope.  Thus, a line parallel to one with a slope of 1/3 is just 1/3.

Answer:

product of power

Step-by-step explanation:

I think this will help you

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\tt{ \green{P} \orange{s} \red{y} \blue{x} \pink{c} \purple{h} \green{i} e}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]88 \frac{19}{32} [/tex]

Answer:

was assigned with this problem (the reference text is attached):

Which of the following, if included in a student's paper, would NOT be an example of plagiarism?

1. In the game of baseball, which is rather boring, the batter stands on home base (Hughes 1).

2. Baseball is rather surprisingly known as "America's Favorite Pastime."

3. Baseball is "a rather boring sport played between two teams of nine players" (Hughes 1).

4. All of these are plagiarism.

The answer tells that only the third choice is NOT a plagiarism. My question is, why is the first choice a plagiarismwas assigned with this problem (the reference text is attached):

Which of the following, if included in a student's paper, would NOT be an example of plagiarism?

1. In the game of baseball, which is rather boring, the batter stands on home base (Hughes 1).

2. Baseball is rather surprisingly known as "America's Favorite Pastime."

3. Baseball is "a rather boring sport played between two teams of nine players" (Hughes 1).

4. All of these are plagiarism.

The answer tells that only the third choice is NOT a plagiarism. My question is, why is the first choice a plagiarism

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

dude what class?

Answer:

First truth table:

~q      p V ~q      ~(p V ~q)

F        T               F

T        T               F

F        F               T

T        T               F

Second truth table:

~q      p V ~q      ~(p V ~q)

F        T                F

Step-by-step explanation:

The ~ operator is a negator (or NOT), such that it is the opposite of the sign.

The first column wants the negation of [tex]q[/tex], and the values of q are

T, F, T, F, for the columns starting from the top. The negation for the columns are F, T, F, T.

For the second column, The 'V' operator is the OR operator, so a single True, or T will result in a True.

For the first row, not q is F, and T OR F will result in T.

For the second row, not q is T, and T OR T will result in T.

For the third row, not q is F, and F OR F will result in F.

For the fourth row, not q is T, and F OR T will result in T.

In the last column, we must figure out not p OR not q, which we did in the last column, so all we must do is figure out the NOT of values of the last column.

The values of the last column are T, T, F, T, respectively, so the not of the columns will be F, F, T, F.

In the bottom truth table, not q, will be F because the value of q is T. The second column wants p OR not q, and we already know that not q is F, and the value of p is T. T OR F is equal to T. In the last column, the question wants the not of p OR not q, which we did in the last column, so we must figure out the not value of the last column, which is T. The not of T is F.

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

→ Simplify

x × ( 9 ) = 10 + 8

→ Further simplify

9x = 18

→ Divide both sides by 9

x = 2

Answer:

the third one

the line extends in both ways forever

Answer:

x = q-4

Step-by-step explanation:

x+4 = q

Subtract 4 from each side

x+4-4 = q-4

x = q-4

Answer:

x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 4 = q

4 = x + q

4 = x

x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

X= -4,-2,2,4 (respectively)

Y=4,-4 (respectively)

hope it helps

Answer:

50,000

Step-by-step explanation:

The product would be 654,100. Replace the other numbers to find the value of 5. The value of 5 is 050,000 or 50,000.

I hope this helps!