Answers
Answer:
2, -1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
2m²-3m-2=0
2m² - 4m + 1m - 2=0
2m(m-2)+(m-2)=0
(2m+1)(m-2)=0
2m+1=0 ⇒ m= -1/2
m-2=0 ⇒ m=2
Related Questions
The local swim team is considering offering a new semi-private class aimed at entry-level swimmers, but needs at minimum number of swimmers to sign up in order to be cost effective. Last year's data showed that during 8 swim sessions the average number of entry-level swimmers attending was 15. Suppose the instructor wants to conduct a hypothesis test. The alternative hypothesis for this hypothesis test is: "the population mean is less than 15". The sample size is 8, LaTeX: \sigmaσ is known, and alpha =.05, the critical value of z is _______. Group of answer choices
Answers
Answer:
The signficance level is 0.05 and then based in the alternative hypothesis we can find a critical value who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the normal standard curve in the left and we got:
[tex] z_{\alpha/2}= -1.64[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]n=8[/tex] the same size given
[te]\sigma[/tex] the population deviation is known
For this case we want to test if the population mean is less than 15 and that represent the alternative hypothesis and the complement would be the null hypothesis. So then the system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu \geq 15[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu <15[/tex]
The signficance level is 0.05 and then based in the alternative hypothesis we can find a critical value who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the normal standard curve in the left and we got:
[tex] z_{\alpha/2}= -1.64[/tex]
The students in Mrs. Willow's reading class are all reading the same novel independently. Four students create a graph of their reading rates, in words per minute, as shown below. Which student reads the fastest? A. Mason B. RIley C. Sarah D. Charlie
Answers
Answer:
Mason reads the fastest
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
try to see how much every person reads every one or two minutes.
Charlie: 350 in two min
Mason :400 in two min
Sarah: 450 in two min (the middle of 300-600 is 450)
so between the three Sarah wins.
now Reilly is a bit more difficult but you can see that she read 4000 in 20 min. so if we divide it by 10 we can see she reads 400 in 2 min. and therefore Sarah os the winner.
20000 rupees to US dollars
Answers
Answer: $264.54
Hope this helped! God bless!
what is the last three
Answers
Answer:
20:30 goes to 8:12
the rest goes to 6:18
Step-by-step explanation:
i may be wrong
Answer:
7:12 is equivalent to 6:18
20:30 is equivalent to 8:12
5:15 is equivalent to 6:18
Step-by-step explanation:
plz mark brainliest
Assume that a randomly selected subject is given a bone density test. Those test scores are normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Find the probability that a given score is less than negative 1.15−1.15 and draw a sketch of the region.
Answers
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the random variable representing the test scores from the bone density test. Since it is normally distributed and the population mean and population standard deviation are known, we would apply the formula,
z = (x - µ)/σ
Where
x = sample mean
µ = population mean
σ = standard deviation
From the information given,
µ = 0
σ = 1
the probability that a given score is less than negative 1.15 is expressed as
P(x < - 1.15)
z = (- 1.15 - 0)/1 = - 1.15
Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is 0.13
P(x < - 1.15) = 0.13
The sketch of the region is shown in the attached photo
1. If the ratio of the ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5 and that of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and the sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years, what is the age difference between oldest the
youngest?
Answers
Answer:
Age difference between oldest the youngest = 48 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Ratio of ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5, ratios of ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5 and sum of the ages of all 3 is 147 years
To find: age difference between oldest the youngest
Solution:
Let age of Lariba be x years
As ratios of ages of Esinam and Lariba is 3:5,
Age of Esinam = [tex]\frac{3}{5}x[/tex] years
As ratio of ages of Kissi and Esinam is 3:5,
Age of Kissi = [tex](\frac{3}{5}) (\frac{3}{5}x)=\frac{9}{25}x[/tex] years
Sum of the ages of all 3 = 147 years
[tex]x+\frac{3}{5}x+\frac{9}{25}x=147\\ \frac{25x+15x+9x}{25}=147\\ x=\frac{147(25)}{49}=75[/tex]
Age of Lariba = x = 75 years
Age of Esinam = [tex]\frac{3}{5}(75)=45\,\,years[/tex]
Age of Kissi = [tex]\frac{9}{25}(75)=27\,\,years[/tex]
So,
Age difference between oldest the youngest = 75 - 27 = 48 years
Which of the following is not approximately equivalent to one of the metric units: 1 meter, 1 kilogram, or 1 liter
Answers
Answer:
A meter is not part of the metric system. It's part of the U.S. customary system.
Anyone Can help me? Thanks
Answers
Answer:
9.8
Step-by-step explanation:
updated
9^2=x^2+4^2
9*9=x*x+4*4
81=x*x-16
+16. +16
97=x*x
√97=√x*x
√97=x
So the answer is √97, but the question wants it rounded so it's actually 9.8
What is the result of converting 81 inches to feet ? Remember, there are 12 inches in a foot.
A) 69 feet
B) 8.1 feet
C) 7.25 feet
D) 6.75 feet
Answers
Answer:
6.75 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
81 inches
We know there are 12 inches in 1 ft
81 inches * 1 ft/ 12 inches = 81/12 ft =6.75 ft
An insurance policy pays a total medical benefit consisting of two parts for each claim. Let X represent the part of the benefit that is paid to the surgeon, and let Y represent the part that is paid to the hospital. The variance of X is 5000, the variance of Y is 10,000, and the variance of the total benefit, X + Y, is 17,000. Due to increasing medical costs, the company that issues the policy decides to increase X by a flat amount of 100 per claim and to increase Y by 10% per claim. Calculate the variance of the total benefit after these revisions have been made
Answers
Answer:
= 19300
Step-by-step explanation:
Each claim consists of two parts = X + Y
where
X = the benefit that is paid to the surgeon and
Y = benefit that is paid to the hospital
V(X) = 5000, V(Y) = 10000 and V(X+Y) = 17000
So V(X+Y) = V(X) + V(Y) + 2cov(X,Y)
17000 = 5000 + 10000 +2 cov(X,Y)
17000 -15000 = 2cov(X,Y)
2000 = 2cov(X,Y)
cov(X,Y) = 1000
Now X is increased by flat Rs. 100 per claim and Y by 10% per claim
total benefit = X+100+Y+0.1Y = X+100 + 1.1Y
V(total benefit) = V(X) + 1.1²V(Y) +2(1.1)cov(X,Y) [ V(aX+bY)
= a²V(X) +b²V(Y) +2abcov(X,Y) and V(X+c) = V(X)]
= 5000 + (1.21*10000) + (2.2*1000)
= 5000 + 12100 + 2200
= 19300
How would you use a completely randomized experiment in each of the following settings?
Is a placebo being used or not? Be specific and give details.
a. A charitable nonprofit organization wants to test two methods of fund-raising. From a list of 1000 past donors, half will be sent literature about the successful activities of the charity and asked to make another donation. The other 500 donors will be contacted by phone and asked to make another donation. The percentage of people from each group who make a new donation will be compared.
b. A tooth-whitening gel is to be tested for effectiveness. A group of 85 adults have volunteered to participate in the study. Of these. 43 are to be given a gel that contains the tooth-whitening chemicals. The remaining 42 are to be given a similar-looking package of gel that does not contain the tooth-whitening chemicals. A standard method will be used to evaluate the whiteness of teeth for all participants. Then the results for the two groups will be compared. How could this experiment he designed to be double-blind?
c. Consider the experiment described in part (a). Describe how you would use a randomized block experiment with blocks based on age. Use three blocks: donors younger than 30 years old. donors 30 to 59 years old. donors 60 and older.
Answers
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Two methods of fund raising is being tested here in the first case study. To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign half the population of the 1000 donor sample that will be sent literature about the successful activities of the charity and asked to make another donation to one of the two treatment conditions: which is a sent literature about the successful activities of the charity. While the placebo group would be the other 500 donors contacted by phone and asked to make another donation with no influence whatever from the charity.
b. For the second case study, To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign 43 particupants which are to be given a gel that contains the tooth-whitening chemicals to the treatment condition containing the tooth-whitening chemicals while the placebo group would be the remaining 42 which are to be given a similar-looking package of gel that does not contain the tooth-whitening chemicals.
c. Using three blocks: the completely randomized design experiment would be:
Donors younger than 30 years old:
Sent literature: Yes No
Contact by phone: Yes No
Donors 30 to 59 years old:
Sent literature: Yes No
Contact by phone: Yes No
Donors 60 and older:
Sent literature: Yes No
Contact by phone: Yes No
(Yes means yes to another donation and No means no to another donation)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Two methods of fund raising is being tested here in the first case study. To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign half the population of the 1000 donor sample that will be sent literature about the successful activities of the charity and asked to make another donation to one of the two treatment conditions: which is a sent literature about the successful activities of the charity. While the placebo group would be the other 500 donors contacted by phone and asked to make another donation with no influence whatever from the charity.
b. For the second case study, To make a completely randomized experiment. I would use and randomly assign 43 particupants which are to be given a gel that contains the tooth-whitening chemicals to the treatment condition containing the tooth-whitening chemicals while the placebo group would be the remaining 42 which are to be given a similar-looking package of gel that does not contain the tooth-whitening chemicals.
c. Using three blocks: the completely randomized design experiment would be:
Donors younger than 30 years old:
Sent literature: Yes No
Contact by phone: Yes No
Donors 30 to 59 years old:
Sent literature: Yes No
Contact by phone: Yes No
Donors 60 and older:
Sent literature: Yes No
Contact by phone: Yes No
(Yes means yes to another donation and No means no to another donation)
The most common form of color blindness is an inability to distinguish red from green. However, this particular form of color blindness is much more common in men than in women (this is because the genes corresponding to the red and green receptors are located on the X-chromosome). Approximately 79% of American men and 0.4% of American women are red-green color-blind.1 Let CBM and CBW denote the events that a man or a woman is color-blind, respectively.
(a) If an Americal male is selected at random, what is the probability that he is red-green color-blind? P(CBM) =
(b) If an American female is selected at random, what is the probability that she is NOT red-green color-blind? P (not CBW) =
(c) If one man and one woman are selected at random, what is the probability that neither are red-green color-blind? P=(neither is color-blind) =
(d) If one man and one woman are selected at random, what is the probability that at least one of them is red-green color-blind? P=(at least one is color-blind)
Answers
Answer:
(a) P(CBM) = 0.07
(b) P(not CBW) = 0.996
(c ) P(neither is color-blind) = 0.926
(d) P=(at least one is color-blind) = 0.074
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct data is that Approximately 7% of American men and 0.4% of American women are red-green color-blind.
(a) Probability that he is red-green color-blind:
[tex]P(CBM) = 0.07[/tex]
(b) Probability that she is NOT red-green color-blind:
[tex]P(not\ CBW) =1- P(CBW)\\P(not\ CBW) = 1 -0.004\\P(not\ CBW) =0.996[/tex]
(c) Probability that neither are red-green color-blind
[tex]P(neither) = P(not\ CBW)*P(not\ CBM) \\P(neither) = 0.996 *(1-0.07)\\P(neither)=0.926[/tex]
(d) Probability that at least one of them is red-green color-blind
[tex]P(at\ least\ one) = 1- P(neither) \\P(at\ least\ one) = 1-0.926\\P(at\ least\ one) = 0.074[/tex]
The radius r of a sphere is increasing at a rate of 3 inches per minute. (a) Find the rate of change of the volume when r = 9 inches. in.3/min (b) Find the rate of change of the volume when r = 37 inches. in.3/min
Answers
Answer:
[tex]\frac{dV}{dt}[/tex] = 1017.87 in³/min
[tex]\frac{dV}{dt}[/tex] = 17203.35 in³/min
Step-by-step explanation:
given data
radius r of a sphere is increasing at a rate = 3 inches per minute
[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex] = 3
solution
we know volume of sphere is V = [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi r^3[/tex]
so [tex]\frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^2 \frac{dr}{dt}[/tex]
and when r = 9
so rate of change of the volume will be
rate of change of the volume [tex]\frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{4}{3} \pi (9)^2 (3)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dV}{dt}[/tex] = 1017.87 in³/min
and
when r = 37 inches
so rate of change of the volume will be
rate of change of the volume [tex]\frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{4}{3} \pi (37)^2 (3)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dV}{dt}[/tex] = 17203.35 in³/min
Help, please. I dont really understand
Answers
Answer:
We can eliminate the second and third options because marking something up doesn't result in a number less than the original. Since we are told to select 3 options and there are 3 answer choices left we select the first, fourth, and fifth statements.
Marcus is trying to find 4 5/6-1 3/6. His work shown. What is Marcus's mistake?
Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4-1=3
Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6-3/6=2/6
Step 3: Subtract the differences. 3-2/6=2 4/6
Answers
Answer:
Step 3
Step-by-step explanation:
The mistake was made in Step 3.
Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4 - 1 = 3
Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6 - 3/6 = 2/6
After Step 2, He should have added them instead of subtracting them:
3 + 2/6 = 3 2/6
So, step 3 was his mistake.
Answer:step 3
Step-by-step explanation: he should have added
in four lines determine how to find a perimeter and area of garden with specific dimensions
Answers
Answer:
[tex]Perimeter\ of\ the\ Garden\ =2(l1*b1)[/tex]
[tex]Area\ of\ the\ garden\ =l1*b1[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Let assume the l1 is the length of the garden and b1 is the breadth of garden then
[tex]Perimeter\ of\ the\ Garden\ = 2 ( L ength + Breadth )\\Perimeter\ of\ the\ Garden\ =2(l1*b1)[/tex]
Now,
[tex]Area\ of\ Garden\ = Length * Breadth[/tex]
[tex]Area\ of\ the\ garden\ =l1*b1[/tex]
A and b are similar shapes. B is an enlargement of a with scale factor 1.5 Work out the value of x, h and w
Answers
Answer:
x = 54°
h = 7.5cm
w= 6cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Find attached the diagrams as found at Maths made easy.
Similar shapes have same shapes but different sizes.
When two shapes are similar, the ratios of the lengths of their corresponding sides are equal.
B is an enlargement of A with scale factor 1.5. That is, each of the sides of B = 1.5 of each side of A
To determine the value of x, h and w, let's look at the relationship of A and B.
h = 1.5 × 5cm
h = 7.5cm
9cm = 1.5 × w
w = 9cm/1.5
w= 6cm
Since the angles do not change when a shape is enlarged, the value of x = 54°
x = 54°
A rectangular field has an area of 1,764 m(squared). The width of the field is 13 m more than the length. What is the perimeter of the field?
Answers
Answer:
170m
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer to the above question is letter d which is 170 m. To get the 170 m, kindly check the below solution:
x^2 + 13x = 1764 so x = -49 and 36, we take 36 as its the positive value. And the other side is 49. Now use 2(l+b) to find perimeter. You get (36+49)*2 = 170
round 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures
I will give brainliest
Answers
Answer:
0.00420 is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
The definition of sig figs is each of the digits of a number that are used to express it to the required degree of accuracy, starting from the first nonzero digit.
The rounding number of 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures is 0.0042
Here,
The number is 0.004198223.
We have to find, 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures.
What is Rounding number?
Rounding means making a number simpler but keeping its value close to what it was.
Here,
The number is 0.004198223.
To find 3 significant figures,
We round a number to three significant figures in the same way that we would round to three decimal places.
Then, We count from the first non-zero digit for three digits. We then round the last digit.
Here, the digit is 9 then it will be round.
We get, the number is;
0.0042
We fill in any remaining places to the right of the decimal point with zeros.
So, The rounding number of 0.004198223 to 3 significant figures is 0.00420
Learn more about the rounding number visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4896544
#SPJ2
New York State's "Quick Draw" lottery moves right along. Players choose between one and 10 numbers from the range one to 80; 20 winning numbers are displayed on a screen every four minutes. If you choose just one number, your probability of winning is 20/80, or 0.25. Lester plays one number fourteen times as he sits in a bar. What is the probability that all fourteen bets lose
Answers
Answer:
0.0178
Step-by-step explanation:
For computation of probability that all fourteen bets lose first we need to find out the Probability of losing in 1 bet is shown below:-
Probability of losing in 1 bet = 1 - P(winning)
= 1 - 0.25
= 0.75
With the help of probability of losing in 1 bet we can find out the Probability of losing in 8 bets which is here below:-
= Probability of losing in 1 bet ^ Number of loosing bets
= 0.75 ^ 14
= 0.017817948
or
= 0.0178
Therefore for computing the probability that all fourteen bets lose we simply applied the above formula.
A student used multiple regression analysis to study how family spending (y) is influenced by income
(x1), family size (x2), and additionsto savings(x3). The variables y, x1, and x3 are measured in thousands
of dollars. The following results were obtained.
ANOVA
df SS
Regression 3 45.9634
Residual 11 2.6218
Total
Coefficients Standard Error
Intercept 0.0136
x1
0.7992 0.074
x2
0.2280 0.190
x3
-0.5796 0.920
a. Write out the estimated regression equation for the relationship between the variables. (1
mark)
b. Compute coefficient of determination. What can you say about the strength of this
relationship? (3 marks)
c. Carry out a test to determine whether y is significantly related to the independent variables.
Use a 5% level of significance. (3 marks)
d. Carry out a test to see if x3 and y are significantly related. Use a 5% level of significance.
Answers
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Given the variables
Y: family spending
X₁: income of a family
X₂: family size
X₃: additions to savings of a family
And the regression output (see attachment)
The population model is Y= α + β₁X₁ + β₂X₂ + β₃X₃
a)
To write the estimated regression equation of the relationship between the variables you have to use the information given in the regression output. Under the column "coefficients", the value that corresponds to "intercept" is the estimation of the y-intercept (a), the value under X₁ corresponds to the estimation for the slop for the variable "income of the family" (b₁), under X₂ is the estimation of the slope for the variable "family size" (b₂) and under X₃ is the estimation for the slope corresponding to the variable "additions to savings" (b₃)
The estimated regression equation is:
^Y= a + b₁X₁ + b₂X₂ + b₃X₃
^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃
b)
Using the SS information you can calculate the coefficient of determination as:
SStotal= SSReg+SSError= 45.9634+2.6218= 48.5852
[tex]R^2= \frac{SS_{Reg}}{SS_{Total}} = \frac{45.9634}{(48.5852)} = 0.946[/tex]
R²= 94.6%
This means that 94.6% of the variability of the average family spending is explained jointly by the family income, the family size and the addition to saving under the estimated model ^Y= 0.0136 + 0.7992X₁ + 0.2280X₂ -0.5796X₃
c)
The hypotheses are:
H₀: β₁= β₂= β₃= 0
H₁: At least one βi≠0 ∀ i=1, 2, 3
α: 0.05
The statistic for the multiple regression is
[tex]F=\frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}} ~~F_{Df_{Reg};Df_{Error}}[/tex]
[tex]MS_{Reg}= \frac{SS_{reg}}{Df_{Reg}}= \frac{45.9634}{3} = 15.32[/tex]
[tex]MS_{Error}= \frac{SS_{Error}}{Df_{Error}} = \frac{2.6218}{11} = 0.238[/tex]
[tex]F_{H_0}= \frac{MS_{Reg}}{MS_{Error}}= \frac{15.32}{0.238}= 64.37[/tex]
p-value < .00001
At a 5% significance level, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This means that the family income, family size and the addition to savings modify jointly the average spending of families.
d.
Individual tests:
There are two possible statistics to test the significance of each independent variable: [tex]t= \frac{b_i-\beta_i }{S_{b_i}} ~~t_{n-3}[/tex] ∀ i= 1, 2, 3, or [tex]F=\frac{MS_{X_i}}{MS_{Error}} ~F_{Df_{X_i}; Df_{Error\\}}[/tex]
Since the output doesn't give us the information of the individual ANOVA, you have to use the t-test (Df: n-3= 12-3= 9) for these hypotheses. Using the p-value approach. the decision rule for the three hypothesis will be:
If p-value ≤ α ⇒ Reject null hypothesis.
If p-value > α ⇒ Do not reject the null hypothesis.
1)
H₀: β₁ = 0
H₁: β₁ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_1-\beta_1 }{Sb_1}= \frac{0.7992-0}{0.074}= 10.8[/tex]
p-value < .00001 ⇒ Decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
2)
H₀: β₂ = 0
H₁: β₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_2-\beta_2 }{Sb_2}= \frac{0.2280-0}{0.190}= 1.2[/tex]
p-value: 0.260773 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.
3)
H₀: β₃ = 0
H₁: β₃ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
[tex]t_{H_0}= \frac{b_3-\beta_3 }{Sb_3}= \frac{-0.5796-0}{0.920}= -0.63[/tex]
p-value: 0.544355 ⇒ The decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.
So, at a 5% significance level, it seems that the three independent variables influence jointly the variation on the average spending of the families, but looking at them separately, only the income of the families seems to affect their spending habits significantly while the family size or their addition to savings don't seem to have major effect over their spending habits.
I hope this helps!
2x2 + 3x ANSWER TO THIS
Answers
Answer:
x(2x+3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Im guessing 2x2 is 2x^2
2x^2 + 3x = 0
x(2x+3)
I don’t know this one
Answers
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
2/3x - 5>3
Add 5 to each side
2/3x - 5+5>3+5
2/3x > 8
Multiply each side by 3/2
3/2 *2/3x > 8*3/2
x > 12
There is an open circle at 12 and the lines goes to the right
(07.01 MC)Of the following sets, which numbers in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} make the inequality 7x + 3 < 17 true? {0} {0, 1} {0, 1, 2} {2, 3, 4}
Answers
Answer:
{0, 1}
Step-by-step explanation:
Solving for 'x' in the inequality:
[tex]7x+3<17\\7x+3-3<17-3 \leftarrow \text{Subtraction Property of Equality}\\7x<14\\7x/7<14/7 \leftarrow \text{Division Property of Equality}\\\boxed{x<2}[/tex]
X's value has to be less than two to make the inequality true. So, {0, 1} should be the correct answer.
Answer:
I took the quiz and the answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve the problem. When going more than 38 miles per hour, the gas mileage of a certain car fits the model where x is the speed of the car in miles per hour and y is the miles per gallon of gasoline. Based on this model, at what speed will the car average 15 miles per gallon? (Round to nearest whole number.)
Answers
Answer:
73 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to be incomplete because the model is missing, I found a similar question with the addition of the model, so if we can solve it (see attached image).
We have that the model would be:
y = 43.81 - 0.395 * x
We need to solve for x, if y = 15
Replacing:
15 = 43.81 - 0.395 * x
Solving for x we have:
0.395 * x = 43.81 - 15
0.395 * x = 28.81
x = 28.81 / 0.395
x = 72.9
We are asked to round to the nearest number therefore x = 73.
The car will average 15 miles per gallon at the speed of 73 miles per hour.
I need help solving this
Answers
Answer:
The answer is the first one on the bottom left.
Step-by-step explanation:
luke is 5 years younger than 3 times sydenys age, s in this situation what does 3s represent
Answers
3s represents three times Sydney's age. Sydney's age is symbolized with an S.
Damian reads 21 pages in 1 hour. How many pages can he read in 3 hours? StartFraction 21 pages Over 1 hour EndFraction = StartFraction question mark pages Over 3 hours EndFraction To go from 1 hour to 3 hours, you _______ . Damian can read _________ pages in 3 hours.
Answers
Answer: (Multiply by 3)
63 pages in 3 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
To go from 1 hour to 3 hours, you
✔ multiply by 3
.
Damian can read
✔ 63
pages in 3 hours.
Step-by-step explanation:
what is the answer to -9x = -27
Answers
Answer:
x = 3
Step-by-step explanation:
9x = 27
Divide both sides by 9,
x = 27/9 which on factorization of the numerator is written as
x = 9 x 3/9 = 3
Calculation 2: Exponent Or Index Method
9x = 27
Since 9 = 3² and 27 = 3³, the given equation takes the form
3² x = 3³
This gives
x = 3³ ÷ 3² = 3³¯² [using the formula a^m ÷ a^n = a^(m-n)]
= 3¹ = 3 (since the first power of a number is the number itself)
9 x 1 = 9
9 x 2 = 16
9 x 3 = 279 x 4 = 36
We stop here because we have already got the answer 27, the right-side of the equality, when 9 is multiplied by 3 . So,
x = 3
hope this helped!
x = 3
Explanation:
Step 1 - Divide both sides by negative nine
-9x = -27
-9x / -9 = -27 / -9
x = 3
What is the area of a triangle with a =25, b =13, and c =17?
a. 99.1 units 2
c. 98.7 units 2
b. 100.5 units 2
d. 102.3 units 2
Answers
Answer:
d. 102.3 units ^2
Step-by-step explanation:
