Answer: he was king, he never disobeyed god, and he put god first in his life, and he would work hard in life
Explanation: says so in the bible
Answer:
Explanation: he was a strong king,
he always put god first
he never sin or betray gods trust
and he would achieve many things and work hard
How does the Bill of Rights affect the federal government? a. It prevents Congress from making laws that would infringe on the freedoms in it. b. It allows Congress to make laws that restrict freedom to protect the common good. c. It gives the president the power to decide what freedoms people have during a crisis. d. It blocks the president from carrying out any law or policy that limits personal freedom.
The Bill of Rights affects the federal government by preventing Congress from making laws that would infringe on the freedoms outlined in it. Answer: a is the correct answer
The Bill of Rights prevents Congress from making laws that would infringe on the freedoms outlined in it.The Bill of Rights affects the federal government by preventing Congress from making laws that would infringe on the freedoms outlined in it. (Answer: a) The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, serves as a crucial safeguard against government overreach and protects the individual rights and liberties of American citizens. It establishes limitations on the powers of the federal government, ensuring that it does not violate fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to bear arms. The Bill of Rights acts as a check on the legislative branch, prohibiting the enactment of laws that would encroach upon these essential freedoms. It upholds the principles of individual liberty and provides a legal framework for citizens to challenge any potential violations of their rights by the government. The Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of the American democratic system, emphasizing the importance of protecting personal freedoms and limiting the scope of governmental authority.For more questions on Bill of Rights
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ8
Answer: a. It prevents Congress from making laws that would infringe on the freedoms in it
Explanation:
which of the following issues was often a problem for local farmers in a colonised region
a: they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonising nations instead of feeding their own people
b: they were driven from their lands because colonising nations used those lands to develop industrial factories
c: they had to raise pigs and cattle’s despite their religious objections to these types of meat.
d: they became poor because they had to pay taxes to the colonising nations in the form of a large share of their crops.
Answer:
A: they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people
Explanation:
(:
Why was nazi ideology considered totalitarian
Answer:
Nazi ideology was considered totalitarian because it sought to control all aspects of society, including politics, economics, culture, and even personal beliefs. The Nazi regime under Adolf Hitler sought to establish a one-party dictatorship in Germany, with absolute control over the media, education, and the legal system. The Nazis also sought to eliminate all opposition, including political opponents, religious groups, and minority populations, through violence, intimidation, and genocide. The regime's goal was to create a "new order" in Europe that would be based on Nazi racial and ideological principles. This level of control and domination over all aspects of society is what characterizes a totalitarian regime.
Answer:
Explanation: Hitler wanted full control, and that's what he got, he had control over all rules, education, media and press, he had the whole army and country to bow before him and however disagreed was prisoned, punished or even killed. he forced people to do what he wanted, he scared them into submission. There was no democracy and the people had no say in any of it.
How did the Spanish and French differ in their treatment of Indigenous peoples? The Spanish forced Indigenous peoples to convert to Christianity while the French built relationships with them. The French arrived in large numbers, while the Spanish arrived in small numbers. The French were dependent on the fur trade, while the Spanish were dependent on the sugar trade. The Spanish built relationships with Indigenous peoples, while the French forced their culture onto them.
Answer: attachment to file 1.
Explanation:
How did Muslims demonstrate religious tolerance toward Jewish and Christian people? Jewish and Christian people could spread their own beliefs. Jewish and Christian people were not required to pay any special taxes. Jewish and Christian people could serve in the government. Jewish and Christian people were given the job of converting Pagans.
Answer:
Muslims demonstrated religious tolerance toward Jewish and Christian people in several ways, including allowing them to spread their own beliefs, exempting them from some religious obligations, and allowing them to hold positions of authority.
Specifically, under Islamic rule, Jewish and Christian people were allowed to practice their own religions and were not required to convert to Islam. They were allowed to build and maintain their own places of worship, and were exempt from some religious obligations that were required of Muslims, such as the obligation to fast during Ramadan. Jewish and Christian people were also allowed to serve in the government and hold positions of authority. Additionally, they were not required to pay any special taxes beyond what Muslims were required to pay.
Overall, Muslim societies demonstrated a degree of religious tolerance toward Jewish and Christian people that was rare for its time, and which allowed for a degree of cultural and religious diversity that was not present in many other parts of the world at that time.
Zheng He traveled across the ________ Ocean to trade with other countries.
A Pacific
B Atlantic
C Arctic
D Indian
Answer: the answer is D
Explanation:
Which 1972 treaty between the U.S and USSR agreed to limit the number of nuclear weapons each country would produce in a year?
The 1972 treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union that agreed to limit the number of nuclear weapons each country would produce in a year is known as the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I).
SALT I was a bilateral agreement signed in Moscow on May 26, 1972, by President Richard Nixon and General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev of the Soviet Union.
It aimed to curtail the arms race between the two superpowers by placing restrictions on the development, deployment, and testing of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).
The treaty set a cap on the number of ballistic missile launchers and agreed to a freeze on the total number of strategic ballistic missile launchers in each country. SALT I was an important step towards arms control and reducing tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War era.
for similar questions on U.S and USSR.
https://brainly.com/question/2958728
#SPJ8
Cow towns were regarded as dangerous places, especially in what
Cow towns were regarded as dangerous places, especially in the Wild West during the late 19th century.
The dangers associated with cow towns stemmed from their unique characteristics and the influx of people involved in the cattle industry. These towns served as hubs for cattle drives, where cowboys would bring herds of cattle to be shipped off to markets in the East. The volatile combination of rowdy cowboys, cattle, and transient populations created an environment prone to lawlessness and violence.In cow towns, saloons and gambling establishments were prevalent, attracting a rough and often unruly crowd. The consumption of alcohol, gambling disputes, and personal conflicts frequently escalated into brawls and gunfights. The presence of outlaws and criminal elements added to the dangerous reputation of these towns.Cow towns were often located in remote and lawless frontier regions, with limited law enforcement and infrastructure. This lack of official control made it easier for criminal activities to go unchecked.While cow towns played a significant role in the cattle industry and the development of the West, they were also notorious for their dangers and lawlessness, contributing to their reputation as dangerous places during that era.For more such questions on Wild West
https://brainly.com/question/31031184
#SPJ8
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members will __________ because they fear any bad publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate. A. refuse to read the bill B. not make a recommendation C. recommend quick passage of the bill D. recommend a televised debate on the bill
In some rare cases with controversial bills, committee members will not make a recommendation because they fear the potential negative publicity that their suggestions or views on the bill could generate. So, option B is the right choice.
This can occur when committee members anticipate public backlash or controversy surrounding their stance on the bill. By abstaining from making a recommendation, they avoid taking a clear position and can distance themselves from any potential criticism.Refusing to read the bill (option A) would generally be seen as neglecting their responsibilities as committee members. Recommending quick passage of the bill (option C) would indicate support for the bill and may not be a viable option if committee members are concerned about public perception. Recommending a televised debate on the bill (option D) could open committee members up to scrutiny and public pressure, which they may seek to avoid.By choosing not to make a recommendation, committee members aim to maintain a neutral stance and minimize the risk of negative publicity associated with their views on the controversial bill.
The right answer is option B. not make a recommendation
For more such question on controversial bills
https://brainly.in/question/16320087
#SPJ8
What was a goal of the Allied occupation of Japan following World War II?. 1. )to help the Japanese learn the ways of self-government. 2. )to prevent the spread of Communism. 3. )to remove Emperor Hirohito. 4. )to punish war criminals
Answer: The occupation of Japan had two primary goals: demilitarization and democratization.
These are the 2 main goals of allied japan
Question 10(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) (01.04 LC) Which Federalist wrote that a stronger central government was necessary and would go on to serve as president?
O Alexander Hamilton
O James Madison
O John Jay
O George Mason
The Federalist who wrote that a stronger central government was necessary and later served as the president of the United States was O Alexander Hamilton
Hamilton was one of the primary authors of the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays written to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. In these essays, Hamilton argued for a stronger central government and the need for a strong executive branch.Hamilton's vision emphasized the importance of a centralized authority to unify the country and ensure its economic stability and security. He advocated for a strong national bank, a robust military, and an active federal government in shaping the nation's economic policies.After the ratification of the Constitution, Hamilton became the first Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington's administration. He played a pivotal role in establishing the country's financial system and promoting policies such as the assumption of state debts, the creation of a national bank, and the implementation of protective tariffs. While Hamilton never served as president himself, his ideas and influence laid the groundwork for the development of a stronger central government in the United States.The correct option is O Alexander Hamilton
For more such questions on Federalist
https://brainly.com/question/28040826
#SPJ8
According to the law of supply, what happens to the quantity supplied when prices go up?
It increases.
It decreases.
It is unchanged.
It is variable.
Answer:
According to the law of supply, when the price of a good or service increases, the quantity supplied also increases. This means that producers are willing and able to supply more of the good or service at a higher price, as they can earn more revenue and profit from each unit sold. Conversely, when the price of a good or service decreases, the quantity supplied also decreases, as producers are less willing and able to produce and sell the good or service at a lower price. This relationship between price and quantity supplied is known as the law of supply.
what aspects of " baseline communism" did European colonists in North America not show to Indigenous people and which confused and argued the indigenous people?
1. assistance when drowning
2.financial loans
3.help and guidance
4.thoughts and prayers
5.food and shelter
根据霍布斯和那些遵循他的推理的最近的社会科学家的说法，我们如何逃脱"霍布斯陷阱"？
自愿屈服于统治者或民族国家
教导植根于犹太教-基督教经文的道德美德
组建自愿民主集体
夺取生产资料
European colonists in North America did not demonstrate several aspects of "baseline communism" to Indigenous people, which caused confusion. These aspects include financial loans, assistance when drowning, help and guidance, and food and shelter.
European colonists in North America did not exhibit the principles of "baseline communism" to Indigenous people, leading to confusion and disputes. Firstly, they did not provide, which were a common feature of baseline communism where resources were shared for the collective good. Instead, colonists introduced a system of private property and capitalism, which prioritized individual ownership and profit-making.
Secondly, colonists did not consistently offer assistance when drowning, which could be seen as a lack of communal care and support. In baseline communism, community members would come together to help those in need, emphasizing the collective responsibility for well-being.
Thirdly, the colonists did not provide extensive help and guidance to Indigenous people. Baseline communism typically involves communal decision-making and shared knowledge, but colonists often imposed their own cultural practices and disregarded Indigenous ways of life, resulting in a lack of understanding and communication.
Finally, the colonists did not consistently provide food and shelter to Indigenous communities. In baseline communism, resources would be shared to ensure everyone's basic needs were met. However, the colonists often seized Indigenous lands and resources, leading to displacement, loss of livelihoods, and scarcity for Indigenous populations.
Learn more about European colonists here:
https://brainly.com/question/4914583
#SPJ11
Among many proofs which I shall bring forward of the power and resources of the Babylonians, the following is of special account...[l]ittle rain falls in Assyria, enough, however, to make the corn begin to sprout, after which the plant is nourished and the ears formed by means of irrigation from the river. For the river does not, as in Egypt, overflow the corn-lands of its own accord, but is spread over them by the hand, or by the help of engines.
-Herodotus, From The History of the Persian Wars, c. 430 BCE
According to Herodotus, how does Egyptian agriculture differ from Babylonian?
Question 3 options:
The Egyptians grow only sprouts instead of corn.
The Egyptians rely on flooding from the river for irrigation.
The Egyptians have to rely on irrigation by hand or by engines.
The Egyptians have less agriculture because they receive little rain.
According to Herodotus, Egyptian agriculture differs from Babylonian that Option B. The Egyptians rely on flooding from the river for irrigation.
In the passage provided by Herodotus, he says that the Babylonians have power and resources, and he uses an example to illustrate this. The example he provides is that in Assyria, little rain falls, which is just enough to make the corn start sprouting. After this, the plant is nourished, and the ears are formed through irrigation from the river. However, the river does not overflow the cornlands as it does in Egypt. Instead, it is spread over them by hand or through the help of engines.
They do not have to irrigate their fields manually or using engines like the Babylonians because the river overflows the cornlands and irrigates them. This is different from what happens in Assyria, where there is little rain, and irrigation has to be done manually or using engines to water the fields.
In conclusion, Herodotus provides an example of how the Babylonians used irrigation to cultivate their crops, which is different from the Egyptians who rely on flooding from the river to irrigate their fields. Therefore, the correct option is B.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
Among many proofs which I shall bring forward of the power and resources of the Babylonians, the following is of special account...[l]ittle rain falls in Assyria, enough, however, to make the corn begin to sprout, after which the plant is nourished and the ears formed by means of irrigation from the river. For the river does not, as in Egypt, overflow the cornlands of its own accord, but is spread over them by the hand, or by the help of engines.
-Herodotus, From The History of the Persian Wars, c. 430 BCE
According to Herodotus, how does Egyptian agriculture differ from Babylonian?
Question 3 options:
A. The Egyptians grow only sprouts instead of corn.
B. The Egyptians rely on flooding from the river for irrigation.
C. The Egyptians have to rely on irrigation by hand or by engines.
D. The Egyptians have less agriculture because they receive little rain.
Know more about Herodotus here:
https://brainly.com/question/6131134
#SPJ8
Which statement best describes Ghana in the years since its independence?
B. Its one party government has created instability, but the peaceful transfer of power between leaders in 2001 was a positive sign.
which of these is true about the slave population in chesapeake coloniesm
Answer:
There were significant numbers of enslaved Africans in the Chesapeake colonies, particularly in Virginia and Maryland. The slave trade was profitable for many plantation owners, who relied on the labor of enslaved people to cultivate crops such as tobacco and rice. Enslaved Africans were brought to the colonies through the transatlantic slave trade, and their labor played a crucial role in the economic development of the Chesapeake region. Slavery in the Chesapeake colonies was a brutal system that involved the exploitation and oppression of human beings, and it had profound and long-lasting effects on American society and culture.
Did America's society during the 1920s portray cultural
pluralism Horace Kallen explained it? Why or why not?
Answer:
Horace Kallen was a philosopher and cultural pluralist who believed that different cultures should be allowed to coexist and flourish in a society. He argued that cultural pluralism, rather than assimilation or melting pot, was a more just and equitable way of accommodating diversity in American society.
During the 1920s, there were certainly aspects of American society that reflected Kallen's vision of cultural pluralism. This was a time of significant social and cultural change, with the rise of jazz music, the Harlem Renaissance, and the flapper culture. These movements celebrated diversity and challenged traditional norms and values. Additionally, the immigration of millions of people from different parts of the world, particularly from Eastern and Southern Europe, brought a diverse array of cultures and traditions to the United States.
However, it is also true that the 1920s was a time of significant racial and ethnic tension in American society. The Ku Klux Klan experienced a resurgence during this period, and discrimination against African Americans, Asian Americans, and other minority groups was widespread. Many Americans held nativist beliefs and feared the "foreignization" of American culture.
Overall, while there were certainly elements of cultural pluralism in American society during the 1920s, it would be inaccurate to say that this was the dominant ideology. The reality is more complex, with both progressive and reactionary forces shaping American culture and society during this period.
This is a term given to individuals of the Middle Ages. It describes a person or group of people who are not affiliated with one of the most popular religions. *a. Pagan b. Christians c. Monotheistic d. Polytheistic
what was the major cause of the hundred years' war
Why were people able to live in suburbs?
A. They could get to work on trains
B. More jobs were available in suburbs
C. Houses were cheaper
D. They needed to live close to work
PLEASE HURRY!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND +15 PTS!!!!
Where do you think England would be today if the Industrial Revolution had not taken over? Describe what you think society would be like today.
Without the Industrial Revolution, England would not have made significant progress in technology. This would have affected areas like transportation, communication, and medicine, which depend on industrial advancements. As a result, England would have fallen behind other countries in terms of technological innovation.
During Rosh Hashanah, a Jewish person would most likely examine their relationship with God. go to work and stick to their routines. engage in a fast by not eating. read the Exodus story.
Answer:
During Rosh Hashanah, a Jewish person would most likely examine their relationship with God. Rosh Hashanah is the Jewish New Year, and it is a time for introspection, reflection, and repentance. Jewish people traditionally take this time to examine their actions over the past year and to seek forgiveness for any wrongdoings or transgressions. This process of self-examination is an important part of the High Holy Days, which culminate with Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. Therefore, the correct answer is: examine their relationship with God.
During Rosh Hashanah, a Jewish person would most likely engage in a fast by not eating.
Explanation:During Rosh Hashanah, a Jewish person would most likely engage in a fast by not eating.
This is because Rosh Hashanah is a time of reflection and repentance, and fasting is a way to demonstrate commitment and sincerity in seeking forgiveness from God.
By abstaining from food, individuals can focus on prayer, introspection, and connecting with their spirituality.
Learn more about Rosh Hashanah here:https://brainly.com/question/33961490
#SPJ2
Why did the major world powers stop fascist aggression?
Answer:they stopped it because people were suffering and being killed my their dictator
Explanation: Fascism: a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government.
Hitler or north koreas ruler is a great example
they control everyone and if anyone steps out of line they are punished or killed, there is no freedom bc they govern everything
The major world powers stopped fascist aggression due to political, military, and moral reasons. They sought to protect their own interests, maintain global security, uphold democratic values, and defend basic human rights. Through military action, alliance formations, and public pressure, they were able to halt and ultimately defeat fascist regimes.
The major world powers stopped fascist aggression primarily due to a combination of political, military, and moral reasons.
1. Political reasons: Fascist aggression threatened the balance of power and stability in the international system. Countries such as Germany, Italy, and Japan sought to expand their territories and influence, which posed a direct challenge to the existing order. The major powers, including the Allied nations, recognized the need to protect their own interests and maintain regional and global security.
2. Military reasons: Fascist regimes demonstrated significant military capabilities and expansionist ambitions. They posed a direct military threat to neighboring countries and territories. To prevent further aggression and protect their own sovereignty, the major powers took action to contain and defeat fascist forces.
3. Moral reasons: Fascist ideologies promoted racism, discrimination, and the suppression of basic human rights. The major powers, particularly those with democratic values, found these principles fundamentally incompatible with their own beliefs. They felt a moral obligation to oppose and defeat fascist regimes in order to protect human dignity, freedom, and democracy.
4. Alliance formation: The major powers formed alliances and coalitions to collectively oppose fascist aggression. For example, during World War II, the Allies (including the United States, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union) joined forces to combat the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan). These alliances provided a unified front against fascist expansionism.
5. Public pressure and popular resistance: In many cases, public opinion played a significant role in pressuring governments to take action against fascist aggression. Movements, protests, and resistance efforts within affected countries and international pressure exerted by anti-fascist groups and activists pushed major powers to respond.
for more questions on fascist aggression
https://brainly.com/question/1615790
#SPJ8
which of the following statements is not true?
Answer:B
Explanation:
Arranged from greatest privileges to fewest privileges, which is the correct order of the Spanish class system? peninsulares, criollos, mestizos, Indigenous peoples, and enslaved persons peninsulares, mestizos, criollos, Indigenous peoples, and enslaved persons criollos, peninsulares, mestizos, Indigenous peoples, and enslaved persons mestizos, peninsulares, criollos, Indigenous peoples, and enslaved persons
Answer:
The correct order of the Spanish class system arranged from greatest privileges to fewest privileges is:
1. Peninsulares
2. Criollos
3. Mestizos
4. Indigenous peoples
5. Enslaved persons
Peninsulares were Spaniards born in Spain, and they held the highest positions of power and authority in the Spanish colonies. Criollos were people of Spanish descent born in the colonies, and while they were not as privileged as Peninsulares, they still held significant power and influence. Mestizos were people of mixed Spanish and Indigenous ancestry, followed by Indigenous peoples, who were subjected to a range of discriminatory policies and practices by the Spanish colonial authorities. Enslaved persons, who were primarily Africans brought to the colonies against their will, were at the bottom of the social hierarchy and had the fewest privileges and the least amount of power.
Answer: its A
Explanation: took the test
Is the source a trustworthy source to use in a research paper? Why or why not? In
your answer, make sure to clearly describe the standards you are using to evaluate it.
Why have you determined that it is or is not a trustworthy one to use?
Evaluating the trustworthiness of a source for a research paper requires considering several key standards These standards include the author's expertise, the publication's credibility, the presence of bias, and the accuracy of the information presented.
First, assessing the author's expertise is crucial. It is important to determine if the author has relevant qualifications, credentials, or experience in the subject matter. This can be done by reviewing their educational background, professional affiliations, and previous works. If the author is recognized as an expert in the field or has published extensively on the topic, it adds credibility to the source.
Second, evaluating the publication's credibility is important. Reputable sources are typically published in peer-reviewed journals, academic publications, or by well-known publishers. These sources go through a rigorous review process to ensure the accuracy and quality of the information. If the publication is recognized in the academic community or has a strong reputation, it increases the trustworthiness of the source.
Third, it is crucial to assess the presence of bias in the source. Bias can manifest in various forms, such as political, ideological, or commercial biases. Biased sources may present information selectively or manipulate facts to support a particular agenda. It is important to consider multiple perspectives and ensure the source presents a balanced and objective view.
Finally, verifying the accuracy of the information presented is essential. Reliable sources provide evidence, references, or citations to support their claims. They use reliable data, conduct thorough research, and adhere to established research methodologies. Fact-checking the information and cross-referencing it with other reputable sources can help determine its accuracy.
Based on these standards, it is possible to assess the trustworthiness of a source. If the source meets these criteria by having well-qualified authors, being published in reputable venues, exhibiting minimal bias, and providing accurate and verifiable information, it can be considered trustworthy. Conversely, if the source lacks expertise, is published in questionable outlets, demonstrates significant bias, or contains inaccuracies, it may not be suitable for a research paper.
for more questions on standards
https://brainly.com/question/19169731
#SPJ8
Which Enlightenment philosopher wrote The Social Contract?
Answer:
Rousseau
Explanation:
In 1762, Rousseau published his most important work on political theory, The Social Contract.
How did Indigenous people react to white settlers in the Northwest Territory? They negotiated with the settlers. They moved out as settlers moved in. They attacked settlements in retaliation. They fought with other Indigenous groups.
Answer:
The reaction of Indigenous people to white settlers in the Northwest Territory varied depending on the specific tribe and circumstances. However, all of the options presented in the question were possible reactions in different situations.
1. Negotiation: Some Indigenous groups initially attempted to negotiate with white settlers in order to establish peaceful relationships and protect their interests. However, these negotiations often failed to achieve a lasting peace, as settlers frequently broke agreements and encroached on Indigenous lands.
2. Displacement: As white settlers moved into Indigenous territories, many Indigenous groups were forced to move out of their traditional lands and into new areas. This displacement was often violent and traumatic, as Indigenous people were uprooted from their homes and forced to adapt to new environments.
3. Retaliation: In some cases, Indigenous groups attacked white settlements in retaliation for encroachments on their lands or other grievances. These attacks could be devastating for both sides and often led to a cycle of violence and reprisals.
4. Conflict with other Indigenous groups: The arrival of white settlers in the Northwest Territory often disrupted long-standing relationships between different Indigenous groups, leading to conflicts and competition over resources. In some cases, these conflicts escalated into violence.
Overall, the relationship between Indigenous people and white settlers in the Northwest Territory was complex and multifaceted, with a range of reactions depending on the specific circumstances and perspectives of different groups.
Question 9 of 10 Which best describes the Mughal Empire? OA. Disinterest in arts and literature B. A flourishing economy OC. Abolishment of religion OD. The spread of Confucianism
Answer:
The correct answer is B. A flourishing economy. The Mughal Empire was a powerful empire that ruled over much of the Indian subcontinent from the early 16th to the mid-19th century. Under the Mughal emperors, the economy flourished, and the empire became known for its wealth and opulence. The empire was a center of trade, with a strong agricultural base and a thriving textile industry. The Mughals also made significant contributions to art and culture, particularly in the areas of architecture, literature, and music.
Which of these holds that people set their own moral standards for judging their actions, based on self-interest? Rights Ethical relativism Virtue ethics Utilitarianism Justice
The ethical perspective that holds that people set their own moral standards for judging their actions based on self-interest is Ethical relativism. The correct option is B.
Ethical relativism is the belief that morality is subjective and varies from person to person or from culture to culture. According to ethical relativism, individuals determine what is morally right or wrong based on their own personal beliefs, values, and interests. This perspective suggests that there are no universal moral principles or standards that apply to all individuals or societies.
Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about Ethical relativism here:
https://brainly.com/question/30546113
#SPJ4
The complete question might be:
Which of these holds that people set their own moral standards for judging their actions, based on self-interest?
A. Rights
B. Ethical relativism
C. Virtue ethics
D. Utilitarianism
E. Justice
