One word-stricken answer: nationalism.
(Devotion/loyalty to one's own country; patriotism)
Some thoughts. Note, literally entire libraries have been written on this topic and some of what I write will be controversial and the detail disputed by professional historians. This is literally only beginning to scratch the surface. These thoughts are not in order, other than the order I think of them.
German people were desperate. They were dejected, demoralised, and suffering after the humiliation of Versailles and the later Great Depression. Desperate people are wont to do things that, after the fact, may seem irrational.The Weimar system had institutional features that made it relatively easy for a smallish band of extremists to make government by moderates difficult. This is true of both extremists on the left (various stripes of communist) and the right (the Nazis). Note how the modern German constitution has been designed to rule out this sort of thing, with thresholds for proportional representation in the Bundestag, constructive majorities needed to dismiss governments, and so on. When moderates fail, people turn to extremists in greater numbers.there was an undercurrent of anti-semitism in Germany and Europe that could be exploited by demagogues. The Nazis weren't starting from a blank slate. Anti-semitism in Europe is much older than that.many German elites were not too worried by the Nazis. They were more worried by communists and so were happy to ally with the Nazis against the communists. There was a real fear of what was pejoratively called Bolshevism in Europe at the time. The liberal democratic/conservative/social democratic paradigm was creaking and people thought we needed a new ideology to replace it. The elites didn't want revolutionary socialism, so they went for a different replacement. That replacement was fascism.in the short term, the Nazis were pretty successful both at military conquest and improving the material condition of ordinary Germans (ordinary Germans that were not part of oppressed groups). This meant that hitherto skeptical people were sometimes brought round to their point of view; maybe Hitler wasn't nuts after allHitler was a pretty decent demagogue and orator, even if his ideas are evil. He genuinely did make people feel good about themselves and Germany. He made them feel part of a greater, valuable whole, working towards the glory of the German reich and volk (Empire and people).By the early 1930s, the Nazis had significant paramilitary muscle in the SA, and later the Gestapo and SS. Not hard to get people to go along with your mad schemes if the consequences of their not doing so is being brutally beaten or murdered. People are generally self-interested and want to preserve themselves. They will bite their tongues to feel safe.There will of course be many more reasons. They are just a few that quickly come to mind.
Question 10(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) (01.04 LC) Which Federalist wrote that a stronger central government was necessary and would go on to serve as president?
O Alexander Hamilton
O James Madison
O John Jay
O George Mason
The Federalist who wrote that a stronger central government was necessary and later served as the president of the United States was O Alexander Hamilton
Hamilton was one of the primary authors of the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays written to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. In these essays, Hamilton argued for a stronger central government and the need for a strong executive branch.Hamilton's vision emphasized the importance of a centralized authority to unify the country and ensure its economic stability and security. He advocated for a strong national bank, a robust military, and an active federal government in shaping the nation's economic policies.After the ratification of the Constitution, Hamilton became the first Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington's administration. He played a pivotal role in establishing the country's financial system and promoting policies such as the assumption of state debts, the creation of a national bank, and the implementation of protective tariffs. While Hamilton never served as president himself, his ideas and influence laid the groundwork for the development of a stronger central government in the United States.The correct option is O Alexander Hamilton
For more such questions on Federalist
https://brainly.com/question/28040826
#SPJ8
The 24th Amendment to the Constitution repealed the poll tax. This was a tax levied by some states to prevent Black and poor White voters from voting in a national election. What reason did some conservatives give to justify opposing the 24th Amendment?
Answer:Constitutional Amendments – Amendment 24 – “Elimination of Poll Taxes” Amendment Twenty-four to the Constitution was ratified on January 23, 1964. It abolished and forbids the federal and state governments from imposing taxes on voters during federal elections.
Explanation:
Zheng He traveled across the ________ Ocean to trade with other countries.
A Pacific
B Atlantic
C Arctic
D Indian
Answer: the answer is D
Explanation:
Which of the following was the core area of the Incan Empire? Brasilia B) Machu Picchu Lima D) Quito Tiahuanaco
The core area of the Incan Empire was D) Cusco.
The Incan Empire's political, administrative, and cultural hub was Cusco. It was regarded as the imperial capital and was situated in modern-day Peru. The Incas ascribed immense significance to Cusco, considering it to be the origin and focal point of their entire world.
The Incan Empire, which had its capital in Cusco, ruled over huge areas of South America, including what is now Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Chile, and portions of Colombia and Argentina.
Learn more about Incan Empire:
brainly.com/question/1792728
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which Of The Following Was The Core Area Of The Incan Empire? A) Brasilia B) Machu Picchu C) Lima D) Cusco E) Tiahuanaco.
Why did the major world powers stop fascist aggression?
Answer:they stopped it because people were suffering and being killed my their dictator
Explanation: Fascism: a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government.
Hitler or north koreas ruler is a great example
they control everyone and if anyone steps out of line they are punished or killed, there is no freedom bc they govern everything
The major world powers stopped fascist aggression due to political, military, and moral reasons. They sought to protect their own interests, maintain global security, uphold democratic values, and defend basic human rights. Through military action, alliance formations, and public pressure, they were able to halt and ultimately defeat fascist regimes.
The major world powers stopped fascist aggression primarily due to a combination of political, military, and moral reasons.
1. Political reasons: Fascist aggression threatened the balance of power and stability in the international system. Countries such as Germany, Italy, and Japan sought to expand their territories and influence, which posed a direct challenge to the existing order. The major powers, including the Allied nations, recognized the need to protect their own interests and maintain regional and global security.
2. Military reasons: Fascist regimes demonstrated significant military capabilities and expansionist ambitions. They posed a direct military threat to neighboring countries and territories. To prevent further aggression and protect their own sovereignty, the major powers took action to contain and defeat fascist forces.
3. Moral reasons: Fascist ideologies promoted racism, discrimination, and the suppression of basic human rights. The major powers, particularly those with democratic values, found these principles fundamentally incompatible with their own beliefs. They felt a moral obligation to oppose and defeat fascist regimes in order to protect human dignity, freedom, and democracy.
4. Alliance formation: The major powers formed alliances and coalitions to collectively oppose fascist aggression. For example, during World War II, the Allies (including the United States, United Kingdom, and Soviet Union) joined forces to combat the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan). These alliances provided a unified front against fascist expansionism.
5. Public pressure and popular resistance: In many cases, public opinion played a significant role in pressuring governments to take action against fascist aggression. Movements, protests, and resistance efforts within affected countries and international pressure exerted by anti-fascist groups and activists pushed major powers to respond.
for more questions on fascist aggression
https://brainly.com/question/1615790
#SPJ8
What was Diderot’s Encyclopedia?
Diderot's Encyclopedia, also known as Encyclopédie, was a landmark publication during the Enlightenment period in the 18th century. It was a comprehensive compilation of knowledge and ideas, aiming to gather and disseminate information on various subjects such as science, philosophy, arts, politics, and more. Edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert, the Encyclopedia sought to challenge traditional authority and promote critical thinking by providing accessible and comprehensive knowledge to the public. It played a significant role in spreading Enlightenment ideals and contributing to intellectual and social progress.
Which statement best describes Ghana in the years since its independence?
B. Its one party government has created instability, but the peaceful transfer of power between leaders in 2001 was a positive sign.
what aspects of " baseline communism" did European colonists in North America not show to Indigenous people and which confused and argued the indigenous people?
1. assistance when drowning
2.financial loans
3.help and guidance
4.thoughts and prayers
5.food and shelter
根据霍布斯和那些遵循他的推理的最近的社会科学家的说法，我们如何逃脱"霍布斯陷阱"？
自愿屈服于统治者或民族国家
教导植根于犹太教-基督教经文的道德美德
组建自愿民主集体
夺取生产资料
European colonists in North America did not demonstrate several aspects of "baseline communism" to Indigenous people, which caused confusion. These aspects include financial loans, assistance when drowning, help and guidance, and food and shelter.
European colonists in North America did not exhibit the principles of "baseline communism" to Indigenous people, leading to confusion and disputes. Firstly, they did not provide, which were a common feature of baseline communism where resources were shared for the collective good. Instead, colonists introduced a system of private property and capitalism, which prioritized individual ownership and profit-making.
Secondly, colonists did not consistently offer assistance when drowning, which could be seen as a lack of communal care and support. In baseline communism, community members would come together to help those in need, emphasizing the collective responsibility for well-being.
Thirdly, the colonists did not provide extensive help and guidance to Indigenous people. Baseline communism typically involves communal decision-making and shared knowledge, but colonists often imposed their own cultural practices and disregarded Indigenous ways of life, resulting in a lack of understanding and communication.
Finally, the colonists did not consistently provide food and shelter to Indigenous communities. In baseline communism, resources would be shared to ensure everyone's basic needs were met. However, the colonists often seized Indigenous lands and resources, leading to displacement, loss of livelihoods, and scarcity for Indigenous populations.
Learn more about European colonists here:
https://brainly.com/question/4914583
#SPJ11
How did the Spanish and French differ in their treatment of Indigenous peoples? The Spanish forced Indigenous peoples to convert to Christianity while the French built relationships with them. The French arrived in large numbers, while the Spanish arrived in small numbers. The French were dependent on the fur trade, while the Spanish were dependent on the sugar trade. The Spanish built relationships with Indigenous peoples, while the French forced their culture onto them.
Answer: attachment to file 1.
Explanation:
How did Indigenous people react to white settlers in the Northwest Territory? They negotiated with the settlers. They moved out as settlers moved in. They attacked settlements in retaliation. They fought with other Indigenous groups.
Answer:
The reaction of Indigenous people to white settlers in the Northwest Territory varied depending on the specific tribe and circumstances. However, all of the options presented in the question were possible reactions in different situations.
1. Negotiation: Some Indigenous groups initially attempted to negotiate with white settlers in order to establish peaceful relationships and protect their interests. However, these negotiations often failed to achieve a lasting peace, as settlers frequently broke agreements and encroached on Indigenous lands.
2. Displacement: As white settlers moved into Indigenous territories, many Indigenous groups were forced to move out of their traditional lands and into new areas. This displacement was often violent and traumatic, as Indigenous people were uprooted from their homes and forced to adapt to new environments.
3. Retaliation: In some cases, Indigenous groups attacked white settlements in retaliation for encroachments on their lands or other grievances. These attacks could be devastating for both sides and often led to a cycle of violence and reprisals.
4. Conflict with other Indigenous groups: The arrival of white settlers in the Northwest Territory often disrupted long-standing relationships between different Indigenous groups, leading to conflicts and competition over resources. In some cases, these conflicts escalated into violence.
Overall, the relationship between Indigenous people and white settlers in the Northwest Territory was complex and multifaceted, with a range of reactions depending on the specific circumstances and perspectives of different groups.
How did the fifteenth amendment to the us constitution contribute to the women’s movement
The 15th Amendment declared that "the right of citizens ... to vote shall not be denied or abridged ... on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" – but women of all races were still denied the right to vote. To Susan B. Anthony, the rejection of women's claim to the vote was unacceptable.
Happy to help; have a great day! :)
Why was D-Day the greatest memory of World War II
Answer:
D-Day, the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944, holds the distinction of being one of the greatest memories of World War II due to its profound impact and historical significance. It marked a pivotal turning point in the war, as it launched a massive assault by the Allied forces against Nazi-occupied Europe, opening up a crucial Western front. The meticulously planned and executed operation involved immense coordination, bravery, and sacrifice from the Allied soldiers who stormed the beaches under heavy fire. D-Day demonstrated the Allies' determination to liberate Europe from the grip of tyranny and marked the beginning of the end for Hitler's Third Reich. It stands as a symbol of courage, unity, and the triumph of democracy over oppression, forever etching its place in the collective memory of World War II.
Explanation:
How was William Wilberforce, a member of Parliament, able to affect the future of slavery in Britain? In 1833, he achieved a ban on the use of enslaved labor in factories. In 1807, he achieved a ban on British slave trade. In 1833, he was able to get reduced penalties for runaways. In 1804, he was able to get an amendment passed abolishing slavery in most Northern US states.
Answer:
William Wilberforce was a member of Parliament who played a key role in the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade and the eventual abolition of slavery in the British Empire.
In 1807, he was able to achieve a ban on the British slave trade through the passage of the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act. This made it illegal for British ships to transport enslaved Africans across the Atlantic.
In 1833, Wilberforce was able to achieve an even greater victory with the passage of the Slavery Abolition Act, which abolished slavery throughout the British Empire. This act also provided for the gradual emancipation of enslaved individuals and compensated slave owners for their loss of property.
While Wilberforce did not achieve a ban on the use of enslaved labor in factories, he did play a role in advocating for better working conditions and protections for workers, including enslaved workers.
Wilberforce's efforts to abolish slavery were based on his deeply-held Christian beliefs and his conviction that slavery was a moral wrong that needed to be eradicated. His tireless advocacy and leadership helped to galvanize public opinion and political action against the institution of slavery in Britain and beyond.
The central government created under the Articles of Confederation had no
power to enforce laws. How did this affect the new country?
Answer: It didn't form a solid The lack of power to enforce laws by the central government under the Articles of Confederation led to chaos and instability in the new country. States had their laws, currency, and militia, which led to conflicts and hindered trade. This situation made it clear that a stronger federal government was necessary to establish order and promote economic growth. The lack of power to enforce laws by the central government created under the Articles of Confederation had a significant impact on the new country. Without a way to ensure that laws were followed, individual states could act in ttheir interestest, leading to conflicts and an unstable government. This weakness was one of the main reasons why the Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the stronger Constitution of the Unite d Stalackanof d central government.
Explanation: The Articles of Confederation was like a rough draft
Match each Jacksonian idea with its effect on American society.
extension of suffrage laws
spoils system
Kitchen Cabinet
encouraged the party supporters to remain loyal to the party
arrowRight
encouraged equality between the common people and the upper class
arrowRight
kept the president updated on the current political issues
Answer:
extension of suffrage laws: encouraged equality between the common people and the upper class
spoils system: encouraged the party supporters to remain loyal to the party
Kitchen Cabinet: kept the president updated on the current political issues
Drag each condition to the correct location. Determine whether the following conditions existed in pre-revolutionary or post-revolutionary France. a. the government was a constitutional monarchy b. the clergy and nobles enjoyed special privileges c. a system of absolute monarchy existed d. special privileges of the clergy and nobles were abolished
The French Revolution had a profound impact on world history. It introduced the concepts of democracy, individual rights, and the rule of law, which have become fundamental to modern society. The Revolution also sparked a series of wars that would last for two decades and reshape the political landscape of Europe.
a. The government was a constitutional monarchy and c. A system of absolute monarchy existed were the conditions that existed in pre-revolutionary France. b. The clergy and nobles enjoyed special privileges were the conditions that existed in both pre-revolutionary and post-revolutionary France. d. Special privileges of the clergy and nobles were abolished was the condition that existed in post-revolutionary France. The French Revolution of 1789 was a turning point in European history.
It ended centuries of arbitrary power by monarchs and introduced the concept of the modern nation-state in which sovereignty rests with the people. The French Revolution was marked by the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy, the execution of King Louis XVI, and the Reign of Terror that followed. The Revolution also led to the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte, who would rule France as its Emperor from 1804 until 1814, when he was defeated by a coalition of European powers at the Battle of Waterloo.
a. The government was a constitutional monarchy and c. A system of absolute monarchy existed were the conditions that existed in pre-revolutionary France. b. The clergy and nobles enjoyed special privileges were the conditions that existed in both pre-revolutionary and post-revolutionary France. d. Special privileges of the clergy and nobles were abolished was the condition that existed in post-revolutionary France.
For more such questions on French Revolution, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1046744
#SPJ8
Why is judicial review an important aspect of the U.S. government?
Answer:
Judicial review is an important aspect of the U.S. government because it allows the judicial branch of government to serve as a check on the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that they do not exceed their constitutional authority.
Under the system of judicial review, the courts have the power to review the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. This means that if a law or action is found to be in violation of the Constitution, the courts have the power to declare it invalid and unenforceable. This power is derived from the principle of "judicial supremacy," which holds that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that the courts have the final authority to interpret and apply it.
By providing a check on the legislative and executive branches, judicial review helps to ensure that the government operates within the bounds of the Constitution and protects the rights and freedoms of citizens. It also helps to prevent abuses of power and can serve as a safeguard against tyranny and oppression.
Overall, judicial review is an essential aspect of the U.S. government because it helps to maintain the balance of power among the three branches of government and ensures that the government operates in accordance with the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution.
What did the Germans create as a solution to the "Jewish problem"
Answer:
The term “Final Solution of the Jewish Question” was a euphemism used by Nazi Germany’s leaders. It referred to the mass murder of Europe’s Jews. It brought an end to policies aimed at encouraging or forcing Jews to leave the German Reich and other parts of Europe. Those policies were replaced by systematic annihilation.
an example of this was concentration camps. these were created to wipe out populations of Jewish people in short spaces of time.
hope that helped
:)
tensions leading up to World War 2 can be traced to which of the following?
Answer:
Primary themes in historical analysis of the war's origins include the political takeover of Germany in 1933 by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party; Japanese militarism against China, which led to the Second Sino-Japanese War; Italian aggression against Ethiopia, which led to the Second Italo-Ethiopian War and Germany's initial success in negotiating the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with the Soviet Union to divide the territorial control of Eastern Europe between them.
hope that was helpful
:D
which of these is true about the slave population in chesapeake coloniesm
Answer:
There were significant numbers of enslaved Africans in the Chesapeake colonies, particularly in Virginia and Maryland. The slave trade was profitable for many plantation owners, who relied on the labor of enslaved people to cultivate crops such as tobacco and rice. Enslaved Africans were brought to the colonies through the transatlantic slave trade, and their labor played a crucial role in the economic development of the Chesapeake region. Slavery in the Chesapeake colonies was a brutal system that involved the exploitation and oppression of human beings, and it had profound and long-lasting effects on American society and culture.
what was the major cause of the hundred years' war
Which Enlightenment philosopher wrote The Social Contract?
Answer:
Rousseau
Explanation:
In 1762, Rousseau published his most important work on political theory, The Social Contract.
What does the author refer to when saying, "Mexicans have had long and deep investments in claiming whiteness in the United States"?
TEXT: Mexicans have had long and deep investments in claiming whiteness in the United States. From the mid-nineteenth century, when they were first granted an "honorary white" status after the U.S.-Mexico War, through the mid-twentieth century, Mexicans struggled for equal rights by vigilantly claiming the rights and entitlements of whiteness.
The author is referring to the idea of white assimilation by Mexican immigrants in the United States.
This is a process that began in the mid-19th century, when Mexicans were granted an "honorary white" status after the U.S.-Mexico War. Through the mid-twentieth century, Mexicans endeavored to claim the rights of whiteness in order to gain access to the same level of rights, safety, and privileges that white citizens enjoyed in the United States.
This process of whitening, or racial uplift, was an effort to gain acceptance and recognition in a white-dominated society through deliberate attempts to blend in and conform to white norms and standards of behavior.
To know more about Mexican immigrants , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31353191
#SPJ4
Cow towns were regarded as dangerous places, especially in what
Cow towns were regarded as dangerous places, especially in the Wild West during the late 19th century.
The dangers associated with cow towns stemmed from their unique characteristics and the influx of people involved in the cattle industry. These towns served as hubs for cattle drives, where cowboys would bring herds of cattle to be shipped off to markets in the East. The volatile combination of rowdy cowboys, cattle, and transient populations created an environment prone to lawlessness and violence.In cow towns, saloons and gambling establishments were prevalent, attracting a rough and often unruly crowd. The consumption of alcohol, gambling disputes, and personal conflicts frequently escalated into brawls and gunfights. The presence of outlaws and criminal elements added to the dangerous reputation of these towns.Cow towns were often located in remote and lawless frontier regions, with limited law enforcement and infrastructure. This lack of official control made it easier for criminal activities to go unchecked.While cow towns played a significant role in the cattle industry and the development of the West, they were also notorious for their dangers and lawlessness, contributing to their reputation as dangerous places during that era.For more such questions on Wild West
https://brainly.com/question/31031184
#SPJ8
What were the major events of the war after the United States entered the conflict? How did the American war effort contribute to the defeat of the Central Powers?
Answer:
The United States entered World War I in April 1917, after years of attempting to remain neutral. Once the U.S. was involved in the conflict, it played a significant role in helping to defeat the Central Powers, particularly through its economic and military contributions. Some of the major events of the war after the U.S. entered include:
1. American Expeditionary Forces: The U.S. sent troops to Europe as part of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), which were commanded by General John J. Pershing. The AEF fought in several major battles, including the Meuse-Argonne Offensive in 1918.
2. Naval Blockade: The U.S. Navy played a major role in enforcing a blockade of German ports, which prevented Germany from receiving critical supplies and resources.
3. Economic Contributions: The U.S. contributed significant resources to the war effort, including food, weapons, and money.
4. Entry of fresh troops: The entry of fresh American troops into the war helped to boost the morale of the Allied forces, as well as provide additional manpower to fight on the front lines.
Overall, the American war effort contributed significantly to the defeat of the Central Powers. The entry of the U.S. into the war provided the Allies with additional resources, manpower, and supplies, which helped to turn the tide of the war. Additionally, the American economy played a crucial role in the war effort, as the U.S. was able to fund the war through loans and other financial contributions. In the end, the combined efforts of the Allies, including the U.S., led to the defeat of the Central Powers and the end of World War I.
Is the source a trustworthy source to use in a research paper? Why or why not? In
your answer, make sure to clearly describe the standards you are using to evaluate it.
Why have you determined that it is or is not a trustworthy one to use?
Evaluating the trustworthiness of a source for a research paper requires considering several key standards These standards include the author's expertise, the publication's credibility, the presence of bias, and the accuracy of the information presented.
First, assessing the author's expertise is crucial. It is important to determine if the author has relevant qualifications, credentials, or experience in the subject matter. This can be done by reviewing their educational background, professional affiliations, and previous works. If the author is recognized as an expert in the field or has published extensively on the topic, it adds credibility to the source.
Second, evaluating the publication's credibility is important. Reputable sources are typically published in peer-reviewed journals, academic publications, or by well-known publishers. These sources go through a rigorous review process to ensure the accuracy and quality of the information. If the publication is recognized in the academic community or has a strong reputation, it increases the trustworthiness of the source.
Third, it is crucial to assess the presence of bias in the source. Bias can manifest in various forms, such as political, ideological, or commercial biases. Biased sources may present information selectively or manipulate facts to support a particular agenda. It is important to consider multiple perspectives and ensure the source presents a balanced and objective view.
Finally, verifying the accuracy of the information presented is essential. Reliable sources provide evidence, references, or citations to support their claims. They use reliable data, conduct thorough research, and adhere to established research methodologies. Fact-checking the information and cross-referencing it with other reputable sources can help determine its accuracy.
Based on these standards, it is possible to assess the trustworthiness of a source. If the source meets these criteria by having well-qualified authors, being published in reputable venues, exhibiting minimal bias, and providing accurate and verifiable information, it can be considered trustworthy. Conversely, if the source lacks expertise, is published in questionable outlets, demonstrates significant bias, or contains inaccuracies, it may not be suitable for a research paper.
for more questions on standards
https://brainly.com/question/19169731
#SPJ8
PLEASE HURRY!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND +15 PTS!!!!
Where do you think England would be today if the Industrial Revolution had not taken over? Describe what you think society would be like today.
Without the Industrial Revolution, England would not have made significant progress in technology. This would have affected areas like transportation, communication, and medicine, which depend on industrial advancements. As a result, England would have fallen behind other countries in terms of technological innovation.
Why was nazi ideology considered totalitarian
Answer:
Nazi ideology was considered totalitarian because it sought to control all aspects of society, including politics, economics, culture, and even personal beliefs. The Nazi regime under Adolf Hitler sought to establish a one-party dictatorship in Germany, with absolute control over the media, education, and the legal system. The Nazis also sought to eliminate all opposition, including political opponents, religious groups, and minority populations, through violence, intimidation, and genocide. The regime's goal was to create a "new order" in Europe that would be based on Nazi racial and ideological principles. This level of control and domination over all aspects of society is what characterizes a totalitarian regime.
Answer:
Explanation: Hitler wanted full control, and that's what he got, he had control over all rules, education, media and press, he had the whole army and country to bow before him and however disagreed was prisoned, punished or even killed. he forced people to do what he wanted, he scared them into submission. There was no democracy and the people had no say in any of it.
Summarize the movement known as the Second Great Awakening between the 1820s and 1850s. What are the origins of the second great awakening? What are the major social reform movements associated with the second great awakening? How did the second great awakening and its associated social reforms influence American society and politics in the 19th century?
Instead of relying on a pastor, regular people were urged to have a personal relationship without God. As more recent groupings, Methodists and Baptists, for instance, expanded swiftly. Analysts claim that while the movement united the colonies and spurred church growth, it also caused conflict. A period of societal change, with a focus on institutional redemption, was ushered in by the Second Great Awakening.
In the 1790s and early 1800s, Presbyterians, Methodists, and Baptists in Kentucky and Tennessee experienced a religious fervour and revival.
Social reform movements including abolitionism and temperance had their beginnings during the Second Great Awakening, which was marked by a wave of fervent religious revivals. Make the decision to reject sin and live a morally upright life. He also exhorted people to lend a hand to those in need. Over the course of the nineteenth century, numerous social reform groups emerged and developed. Abolition, temperance, labour and industrial safety, education, women's rights, and jail reform were among the themes that these societies addressed.
Learn more about Great Awakening, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29264170
#SPJ4
Why were people able to live in suburbs?
A. They could get to work on trains
B. More jobs were available in suburbs
C. Houses were cheaper
D. They needed to live close to work
