How did Hitler achieve to persecute the Jewish?​

Seljuk Turk expansion into Anatolia threatened Byzantine territories, prompting a call for help from the Christian world.The Battle of Manzikert in 1071 led to the Seljuk capture of Byzantine Emperor Romanos IV, weakening Byzantine defenses and stability.The Seljuk Turks' persecution of Christian pilgrims and the closure of key pilgrimage routes, such as Jerusalem, stirred religious fervor among European Christians.The conquest of Antioch by the Seljuk Turks in 1084 alarmed European Christians and intensified their desire to reclaim Christian holy sites in the Holy Land.

Expansion and Threat to Byzantine Empire: The Seljuk Turks' rapid expansion into Anatolia posed a direct threat to the Byzantine Empire, leading to increased tensions and territorial disputes. This expansionist agenda alarmed the Christian world, as the Seljuks encroached upon Byzantine territories.

Battle of Manzikert (1071): The decisive victory of the Seljuk Turks over the Byzantine Empire at the Battle of Manzikert resulted in the capture of Byzantine Emperor Romanos IV. This defeat weakened Byzantine defenses and stability, leaving a power vacuum in the region.

Persecution of Christian Pilgrims: The Seljuk Turks' mistreatment and persecution of Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land, including harassment, looting, and obstruction of pilgrimage routes, deeply angered and offended the European Christian population. Reports of these atrocities spread throughout Europe, fostering a sense of outrage and a desire for intervention.

Conquest of Jerusalem (1071): The Seljuk Turks' conquest of Jerusalem from the Fatimid Caliphate in 1071 raised concerns among European Christians about the fate of their holy sites and the ability to freely access them. The loss of Jerusalem, a significant religious and cultural center, further galvanized Western Christians, fueling the call for a military response to reclaim the Holy Land, culminating in the First Crusade.

For more such question on Turks

https://brainly.com/question/4459098

#SPJ11

Burnett Miller initially believed the wartime propaganda was "an awful lot of baloney" because he likely had a skeptical attitude towards the information being presented. he might have questioned the accuracy and truthfulness of the messages being conveyed, considering that propaganda often aims to shape public opinion and manipulate perceptions.

as the war progressed, Burnett Miller's attitude likely changed due to several factors:

first-hand experiences: as Miller witnessed the events and realities of the war, he would have encountered situations that contradicted or challenged the propaganda he had previously dismissed. personal experiences, such as witnessing the destruction, loss of lives, or interacting with soldiers and civilians directly affected by the war, could have made him reconsider his initial skepticism.

access to diverse perspectives: over time, Miller might have gained access to alternative sources of information, including news reports, testimonies, or firsthand accounts from soldiers, journalists, or civilians involved in the conflict. this exposure to different viewpoints and narratives would have provided him with a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and potentially countered the simplistic narratives presented in wartime propaganda.

recognition of propaganda tactics: as Miller became more familiar with the strategies employed in propaganda, he might have developed a critical eye and recognized the manipulative techniques used to shape public opinion. this awareness would have allowed him to differentiate between biased propaganda and more reliable sources of information. overall, Burnett Miller's attitude likely evolved as he gained a deeper understanding of the war through direct experiences and exposure to diverse perspectives, leading him to reassess his initial skepticism of wartime propaganda.

Answer:1: Juvenal Habyarimana was the leader,Habyarimana's private Falcon 50 jet was shot down near Kigali International Airport, killing Habyarimana.

2:Economic forces. Rwanda was very poor, and in the years just before the genocide it had become poorer

3:Since the genocide, the government adopted a policy of open return and reconciliation for many of the former soldiers who participated in the genocide.

4:By outlawing hate groups and prosecuting hate crimes

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct option is:

D. citizens can trust financial institutions to invest money responsibly.

The free enterprise system relies on private businesses and corporations operating based on free market principles of supply and demand, competition, and profit motivation. Citizens trusting that financial institutions and capital markets are investing funds responsibly and effectively facilitating the flow of money and resources contributes to the effective functioning of the free market system.

Options A, B and C are misconceptions.

Businesses operate globally, not within one country.

The government does not guarantee jobs or directly provide most jobs in a free market economy.

Businesses aim to maximize profits, not distribute most profits.

Financial institutions investing irresponsibly could distort the system, not enable its effective working.

So the key factor is citizens trusting that the financial system is responsibly managing investments and capital to support business operations and economic activity - choice D is the correct option.

Explanation:

Answer:

the vice president has the sole power to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally presides over the receiving and counting of electoral ballots cast in presidential elections

Explanation:

Opinion: I believe that we have a right to own Guns. The second amendment of the Constitution says "... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."  I believe that in many cases, these awful things that happen with guns are because a gun got into the wrong hands. Most of the time they get into the wrong hands Illegally The U.S Government is trying to say that guns are bad and they ki.ll people. It's really the person holding the gun. The gun doesn't shoot without someone pulling the trigger. One example is when someone crashes into another car, it's not the fault of the vehicle, it's the fault of the driver operating the car.

A problem that our society has now is that a lot of people use violence to settle problems and it's sad. Another problem is that a lot of criminals do trades for stolen guns.

Answer: After the American Civil War and the subsequent abolition of slavery in the 1860s, the Reconstruction Amendments to the United States Constitution granted emancipation and constitutional rights of citizenship to all African Americans, most of whom had recently been enslaved.

Explanation:

Answer: The civil rights movement come to an existence because civil rights movement was a nonviolent social movement and campaign from 1954 to 1968 in the United States to abolish legalized racial segregation, discrimination, and disenfranchisement throughout the United States. The movement had its origins in the Reconstruction era during the late 19th century, although it made its largest legislative gains in the 1960s after years of direct actions and grassroots protests. The social movement's major nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience campaigns eventually secured new protections in federal law for the civil rights of all Americans.

Explanation:

Impressions are the moments when digital advertising or other type of media first appears on a user's screen.

CPM campaigns are perfect for companies looking to increase brand recognition because impressions are not action-based and are simply determined by a user possibly viewing the advertising. Impressions are the total number of times that your material is shown, whether or whether someone clicks on it.

Consider reach as the number of distinct viewers of your material. Every piece of information you submit would be viewed by every one of your followers in an ideal world. In reality, an impression happens each time a person launches an app or visits a website and notices an advertisement. It shouldn't be mistaken for becoming engaged.

Learn more about campaigns here:

https://brainly.com/question/29889786

#SPJ1

Answer:

Their participation created new political models that encouraged women to be active and public revolutionary figures alongside men.

Explanation:

Answer: Its's in the middle colonies so the answer would be south

Explanation:

One major difference between Prior's and Herring's historical interpretations of Roosevelt's role in World War II is their views on Roosevelt's intentions and objectives in the conflict.

Prior argues that Roosevelt deliberately provoked Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor to rally public support for entering the war.

According to Prior, Roosevelt sought to bring the United States into the war as a means to revitalize the American economy and expand its global influence. On the other hand, Herring maintains that Roosevelt's primary goal was to defend American interests and secure international stability.

Herring suggests that Roosevelt responded to the attack on Pearl Harbor as a necessary and justified action to protect national security, rather than a calculated maneuver.

For more such question on World War II

https://brainly.com/question/1198412

#SPJ11

According to the information, Ali's record in professional boxing was 56 wins

Muhammad Ali was an American professional boxer who is widely considered one of the greatest boxers of all time. He was born on January 17, 1942 in Kentucky and startedd his professional career in boxing in 1960.

Additionally, Ali's record in professional boxing was 56 wins (including 37 knockouts) and 5 losses. However, his impact on the sport and on society at large went far beyond his record in the ring, as he was also known for his political activism.

Learn more about boxing in: https://brainly.com/question/12456483

#SPJ1

Answer:

Ignoring counter storytelling when studying history can have several downsides:

Bias: Focusing only on one perspective or narrative can lead to a biased understanding of historical events. By ignoring counter storytelling, historians risk perpetuating dominant narratives and excluding marginalized or minority voices from the historical record.

Incomplete picture: Counter storytelling can provide important context and insight into historical events that might otherwise be overlooked or ignored. Without considering diverse perspectives and experiences, historians may miss important aspects of a particular historical period or event.

Missed opportunities for learning: Counter storytelling can challenge assumptions and offer new perspectives on familiar historical narratives. Ignoring these stories can limit our understanding of the complexities of historical events and the diverse experiences of people who lived through them.

Repetition of mistakes: Ignoring counter storytelling can lead to a failure to learn from past mistakes. Without understanding the full context and diverse experiences of historical events, historians may fail to recognize patterns and trends that could inform decision-making in the present.

In conclusion, ignoring counter storytelling when studying history can limit our understanding of the past, perpetuate biases, and impede our ability to learn from historical events. Therefore, it is important for historians to actively seek out diverse perspectives and engage with counter storytelling to gain a more complete and nuanced understanding of historical events.

Answer: After the American Civil War and the subsequent abolition of slavery in the 1860s, the Reconstruction Amendments to the United States Constitution granted emancipation and constitutional rights of citizenship to all African Americans, most of whom had recently been enslaved.

Explanation:

Answer:

The best answer has to be

A.Maintaining alliances with neighboring tribes

Explanation:

Answer: Russia and North Korea

Explanation:

Answer:

North Korea and Russia, I think China also is one but I don't really know.

Hope this helps :)

Pls brainliest...

Israel

this took place in the 1980's known as the Iran contra affair

Answer:

What are the strategies in developing learners speaking skill

Answer:

The most effective method for changing society would be through show of force, which is using a violent tactic.

Explanation:

The question is not asking about whether or not a method is effective in the long-term, nor is there a checklist of the requirements that should be met in changing society. Society as a whole effectively changes through violence, regardless if the said violence is in the spotlight or not.

An really great example of violent tactics being the force that changed the trajectory of US public in relations to racial tensions is the black panthers, who believed that nonviolent protests are not as effective, and that both the defense of the African American's personal lives and their liberties through aggression was called for to sustain equal rights. The violence of the Black Panthers, in that case, drew many to support more moderate forms of protests for equal rights, such as the protest under Martin Luther King Jr.

Whether or not the methodology of violence is effective directly or indirectly, they have been used to create change, or even dismantle current systems. While the Black Panthers may be seen as a way in which violence indirectly helped peaceful causes to gain the common goal of equality, there examples in which violence can directly change the trajectory of society.

A good example of a direct violent change is the Vietnam War, in which the unpopular South Vietnamese government under Ngo Dinh Diem, caused a war to break out in which rebels (known as Viet Congs), aided by North Vietnamese (North Vietnamese Army), rebelled and removed the Diem government after the United States pulled out of the war due to public outcry and protests. Through violence, the Communists were able to reunite the country and provide their free reign of terror on their citizens through Bamboo Gulags, which were essentially reeducation as well as extermination camps. This method was extremely effective in cracking down on dissent and keeping the country aligned with communist values.

Of course, this is extremely dependent on the culture and nation that is being addressed, but if all other methods of changing society fails, violence is the last resort in most cases, to impose the winners will on all. As the last resort, it will also mean that it is the most effective in producing the results that are required in most cases.

Learn more about how society changes, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9072369

(A) Ruler in Ancient Mesopotamia was primarily a lawgiver.

(B) Ruler in Classical Athens was a representative of the people.

(C) Ruler in Achaemenid Persia was expected to be virtuous.      

(D) Ruler in Ancient Egypt was primarily a religious figure.

The passage describes the role of the ruler, the Son of Heaven or emperor, in ancient China. Based on this description, we can compare the role of the ruler in China to the rulers of the four other options provided: Ancient Mesopotamia, Classical Athens, Achaemenid Persia, and Ancient Egypt.

In Ancient Mesopotamia, rulers such as the Babylonian king Hammurabi were responsible for maintaining law and order in society through a code of laws. The king was considered the representative of the gods on earth and had both religious and political authority. The role of the Mesopotamian ruler was therefore primarily as a lawgiver and enforcer, rather than as a religious figure.

In Classical Athens, rulership was based on a democratic system in which all citizens had a voice and a vote in government. The city was ruled by a council of citizens and officials, rather than by a single individual. The Athenian ruler was therefore more of a representative of the people, rather than a traditional monarch.

In Achaemenid Persia, the Persian king was considered the "King of Kings" and had absolute power over his subjects. However, the king was also expected to act as a just and wise ruler, guided by the principle of "good thoughts, good words, and good deeds." The role of the Persian king was therefore one of both power and virtue, and he was expected to lead by example.

In Ancient Egypt, the ruler, or pharaoh, was believed to be a god-king with absolute power and authority over his subjects. The pharaoh was responsible for maintaining the cosmic order of the universe and was associated with various gods and goddesses. The role of the pharaoh was therefore primarily religious, with the king serving as an intermediary between the people and the gods.

Comparing the descriptions of rulership in these five regions and time periods, we can see that the role of the ruler in China was unique in its combination of political and religious authority. The Son of Heaven was both a powerful political leader and a religious figure, responsible for worshipping the sun and moon and maintaining cosmic balance.

The ruler in Ancient Mesopotamia was primarily a lawgiver, the ruler in Classical Athens was a representative of the people, the ruler in Achaemenid Persia was expected to be virtuous, and the ruler in Ancient Egypt was primarily a religious figure.

for similar questions on emperor

https://brainly.in/question/2944920

#SPJ11

Read the passage and answer the question.

The Son of Heaven [the emperor] mounts his jade carriage drawn by dragon-like horses, on which is displayed the great standard with the likenesses of the sun and moon upon it, along with dragons ascending and descending. In this the emperor goes to worship the sun outside the east gate.

Give the  description of the role of the ruler given in this passage.

(Choice A) Ancient Mesopotamia

(Choice B) Classical Athens

(Choice C) Achaemenid Persia

(Choice D) Ancient Egypt

Answer:

B) Classical Athens

Explanation:

Got it right on Khan Academy

African American men and women served during World War II helped change the military by challenging segregation and discrimination proving their abilities and patriotism.

To advance civil rights by engaging in activism legal challenges and influencing public perception.

African American men and women played significant roles in World War II both in the military and on the home front.

Their contributions during the war had a profound impact on the advancement of civil rights in the United States.

Some key ways in which they helped change the military during World War II and later used this experience to advance civil rights:

Military Service:

African American men and women served in segregated units within the U.S. military during World War II.

Despite facing racial discrimination and limited opportunities for advancement their service demonstrated their dedication and patriotism.

Their involvement challenged prevailing stereotypes and prejudices about African Americans' abilities and commitment to the nation.

Double Victory Campaign:

African American leaders and organizations, such as the National Urban League and the NAACP launched the Double Victory Campaign during World War II.

The campaign aimed to fight against fascism abroad and racism at home.

It highlighted the irony of African Americans fighting for freedom and democracy overseas while facing discrimination and segregation in their own country.

Tuskegee Airmen:

The Tuskegee Airmen were a group of African American pilots, navigators and support personnel who served in the Army Air Forces during World War II.

They overcame significant barriers and prejudice to become one of the most distinguished fighter groups of the war.

Their exemplary combat record and professionalism helped dispel the myth of African Americans' inferiority and contributed to the desegregation of the military.

Civil Rights Activism:

After World War II many African American veterans returned home with a newfound sense of confidence and determination.

They had fought for freedom and equality abroad and were not willing to accept segregation and discrimination in their own country any longer. African American veterans became important figures in the civil rights movement using their military experience to advocate for equal rights and social justice.

Legal Challenges:

African American veterans and civil rights activists used legal means to challenge segregation and discrimination.

Their experiences during the war influenced court cases and legal strategies that sought to dismantle segregationist policies.

The landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v.

Board of Education in 1954 declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional drew upon the arguments and evidence presented by African American lawyers and veterans.

Public Perception:

The bravery and sacrifices of African American servicemen and servicewomen during World War II helped shift public perception and challenge racial stereotypes.

Their contributions to the war effort were widely recognized, and their actions highlighted the inconsistencies of racial discrimination.

This recognition helped pave the way for broader support for civil rights reforms in the years that followed.

African American men and women who served during World War II helped change the military by challenging segregation and discrimination proving their abilities and patriotism.

They later used their wartime experiences to advance civil rights by engaging in activism legal challenges and influencing public perception. Their collective efforts played a significant role in the broader struggle for racial equality in the United States.

For similar questions on World War II

https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ11

In the initial part of the movie "The Green Berets," there is a discussion between those who support the military and those who are against the war. Supporters highlight the need for military intervention to protect freedom, while opponents argue against the war, emphasizing the loss of life and the questionable motives behind it.

In the initial part of the movie "The Green Berets," a demonstration of the Green Berets' capabilities sparks a discussion between those who support the military and those who are against the war. The supporters emphasize the importance of military intervention in preserving freedom and democracy, viewing the Green Berets as patriotic heroes defending their country. They argue that the war is necessary to prevent the spread of communism and protect American interests abroad.

On the other hand, the opponents of the war raise concerns about the loss of life and question the motives behind the conflict. They criticize the government's decision to send troops to a foreign land, arguing that it is an unnecessary and unjustified war. They express skepticism about the effectiveness of military intervention and highlight the potential for civilian casualties and long-lasting consequences.

The discussion between these two sides reflects the broader societal debates and divisions surrounding the Vietnam War during the era in which the movie was released. It presents contrasting viewpoints on the use of military force and raises moral and political questions about the nature of warfare and its consequences.

For such more question on protect freedom

https://brainly.com/question/19131523

#SPJ11

The tightening of regulations and scrutiny from the US Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission made the collapse of SVB more likely.

In 2018, several factors contributed to the increased likelihood of the collapse of SVB.

One major factor was the tightening of regulations and scrutiny on the tech industry, particularly in regards to data privacy and security.

SVB, which primarily provided banking services to startups and tech companies, faced increased pressure to ensure their clients were compliant with these regulations.

Additionally, the escalating trade tensions between the US and China, which had a significant impact on the tech industry, put SVB's business at risk.

The bank's heavy reliance on venture capital funding also made it vulnerable to market volatility.

The rationale for the potential collapse was that these factors, combined with a possible economic downturn, could create a perfect storm that would make it difficult for SVB to sustain its business model.

For more such questions on Commission:

https://brainly.com/question/881794

#SPJ11

Most white Southerners historically throughout the time of enslavement in the United States thought it was acceptable and important for their way of life and economic development. They considered those who were held as slaves to be a property that they had the right to own and exploit for their own gain. A lot of people also thought that slavery was justified by moral and theological justifications, arguing that it was a necessary evil that helped to "civilize" and "Christianize" those who were enslaved.

The distinction between white Southerners who opposed slavery for moral and ethical reasons and those who actively campaigned to end it through the abolitionist movement must be made. However, most white Southerners at the time supported slaves and benefited from it.

Someone who believes the Fed should be abolished might argue that it helps prevent bank failures. Thus, option C is the correct option.

The country's secure, adaptable, and stable monetary and financial system is provided by the Federal Reserve, the country's central bank. The Federal Reserve is the nation's central bank. The Fed offers a number of services that support keeping the economy and banks stable.

Commercial banks are required by the Fed to reserve a certain amount of their deposits. If there are unexpectedly large withdrawals, the bank may be able to access this reserve to help with liquidity. Thus, bank failures are avoided. Thus, one may counter that the Fed helps avoid bank collapses if they think it should be eliminated.

Learn more about Fed here:

https://brainly.com/question/20628585

#SPJ1

Probably the full options are:

A. harmed the financial markets post-September 11th by maintaining their liquidity.

B. supports a currency monopoly and benefits the wealthy over others.

C. helps prevent bank failures.

D. provides important services, such as check processing.

William Penn's hope for the Pennsylvania colony was that it would serve as a beacon for religious freedom and equality. The correct option is a.

William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania and one of the first champions of expressive freedoms in the American colonies, demonstrated how a free society could work and how individuals of different races and religions could live together in liberty and peace.

The principles of freedom that Penn promoted and adopted helped lay the framework for the First Amendment. Thus, William Penn's hope for the Pennsylvania colony was that it would serve as a beacon for religious freedom and equality.

Learn more about Penn, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9493836

#SPJ1

The Battle of Stalingrad (1942-1943) : The Soviet Union scored a significant win with this one, which launched their Eastern Front counteroffensive against the Germans.

The Battle of Midway (1942) : The Pacific War's turning point was this naval conflict between the United States and Japan. The US was successful in taking control of the Pacific and destroying a sizable chunk of the Japanese fleet.

The D-Day invasion (1944) : The Allies were able to gain a foothold in Western Europe thanks to this significant Allied invasion of France's Normandy, which ultimately resulted in the defeat of Nazi Germany.

The Battle of Kursk (1943) : This was the largest tank fight in history, and the Soviet Union won it handily on the Eastern Front. As a result, Germany was ultimately defeated on the Eastern Front.

The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945) : This was a controversial decision by the United States, but it ultimately led to Japan's surrender and the end of World War II.

The presents that Santa should give are A. Santa should deliver three action figures and two squirt guns.

Santa should make the number of presents such that the marginal utility is rising and not falling. Or rather, at the quantity where the marginal utility for both the action figures and the squirt guns are the same.

The marginal utility that is the same for squirt guns and action figures is 40 and this quantity corresponds to 3 Action Figures and 2 Squirt Guns so this is the quantity that Santa should produce.

Find out more on marginal utility at https://brainly.com/question/13616701

#SPJ1

Answer:

Racism is a pervasive problem that affects many people around the world, including in South Africa and Germany. While the two countries have different histories and cultural contexts, both have experienced significant challenges related to racism.

South Africa has a long and complex history of racial discrimination and segregation under the system of apartheid, which was in place from 1948 until the early 1990s. During this time, people of color, particularly Black South Africans, were subjected to systemic oppression and violence, including forced removals from their homes, restricted access to education and jobs, and political disenfranchisement. Although apartheid officially ended in the 1990s, its legacy still persists in many ways, and racism continues to be a major issue in South Africa.

In recent years, there have been numerous reports of hate crimes and xenophobic attacks against immigrants and refugees in South Africa, particularly from other African countries. This has led to tensions and divisions within the country and has highlighted the ongoing struggle to overcome racism and discrimination.

Germany has a more recent history of racism, particularly related to its treatment of immigrants and refugees. Following World War II, Germany became home to a large number of guest workers from other countries, many of whom faced discrimination and marginalization. In recent years, there has been a rise in far-right and xenophobic political movements in Germany, which has led to increased incidents of hate crimes against immigrants and refugees, particularly those from Muslim countries.