Answer & Explanation:
The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, had a significant impact on immigration to the United States. Here are some key points regarding its effects:
1. Quota System: The act established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants allowed into the country. The quotas were based on national origin and aimed to restrict immigration from certain regions, particularly Southern and Eastern Europe, which were considered undesirable by the proponents of the act.
2. National Origins Formula: The act introduced a formula that allocated immigration quotas based on the proportion of each nationality present in the U.S. population according to the 1890 census. This formula favored immigrants from Western and Northern European countries while severely limiting immigration from other parts of the world.
3. Reduction in Total Immigration: The implementation of the quota system significantly reduced overall immigration to the United States. The annual number of immigrants allowed was capped at 150,000, a drastic reduction compared to previous years. This restriction aimed to preserve the existing ethnic composition of the population and limit the influence of non-Western and non-Northern European immigrants.
4. Impact on Southern and Eastern European Immigration: The Immigration Act of 1924 had a particularly profound effect on immigration from Southern and Eastern European countries. These regions experienced a substantial decrease in immigration, as the quotas assigned to them were significantly lower compared to Western and Northern European countries. Consequently, it led to a decline in the number of immigrants from Italy, Poland, Greece, and other countries in that region.
5. Exclusion of Asian Immigrants: The act extended the existing ban on immigration from Asian countries, including China and Japan. It reinforced discriminatory policies that had already been in place, severely limiting immigration from Asia and perpetuating racial and ethnic biases in the immigration system.
Overall, the Immigration Act of 1924 marked a shift towards a more restrictive immigration policy in the United States. It significantly curtailed immigration from certain regions of the world and reinforced discriminatory practices based on national origin and race. The act's effects were felt for decades and had a lasting impact on the demographic composition of the American population.
How did rii's interpretation help you understand the progressive movement
Rii's interpretation of the Progressive Movement helps one understand the reforms that the Progressive Movement sought to achieve.
Rii's interpretation helps in understanding the Progressive Movement by highlighting the movement's central themes, which were progressivism, social justice, and equality. Rii argued that the Progressive Movement was a response to the rapid industrialization and urbanization that occurred during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
The movement's central themes were progressivism, social justice, and equality. Progressivism was the belief that the government should play an active role in regulating the economy and promoting social welfare.
Social justice was the idea that everyone, regardless of their background or economic status, should have equal access to opportunities and resources. Equality was the goal of eliminating the social, economic, and political barriers that prevented people from achieving their full potential.
In conclusion, Rii's interpretation helps to understand the Progressive Movement by highlighting the movement's central themes and specific reforms.
The movement sought to promote progressivism, social justice, and equality and achieve specific reforms aimed at improving the lives of ordinary Americans. The Progressive Movement was a response to the rapid industrialization and urbanization that occurred during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
For more such question on Progressive Movement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8179112
#SPJ8
how did the stock market crash of 1929 contribute to the great depression
The stock market crash of 1929 contributed to the Great Depression by triggering a loss of confidence, leading to a decline in consumer spending, business failures, and a widespread economic downturn.
The stock market crash of 1929 played a significant role in contributing to the Great Depression through a series of interconnected factors:
Loss of Confidence: The crash eroded investor confidence, leading to a widespread panic selling of stocks. This sudden decline in stock values shattered the public's trust in the financial system.Wealth Destruction: Many investors lost substantial amounts of money during the crash. The decline in stock values wiped out fortunes and weakened consumer spending power, as people felt financially insecure and cut back on their expenditures.Bank Failures: As stock prices plummeted, banks faced significant losses due to loans made for speculative investments. Unable to cover withdrawals, numerous banks collapsed, causing a wave of bank runs and further financial instability.Contraction of Credit: With bank failures and reduced consumer spending, credit became scarce. Businesses struggled to obtain loans to finance their operations, leading to reduced production, layoffs, and ultimately, widespread unemployment.Decline in Global Trade: The economic downturn in the United States spread to other countries through reduced demand for imports. Tariffs and trade barriers exacerbated the situation, leading to a decline in international trade and exacerbating the global economic crisis.Feedback Loop: The stock market crash and the subsequent economic downturn reinforced each other in a feedback loop. The financial crisis weakened the economy, and the weakened economy further undermined the financial system, deepening the severity and duration of the Great Depression.Overall, the stock market crash of 1929 served as a catalyst that amplified the underlying economic weaknesses, triggering a chain reaction of events that led to the prolonged and severe economic crisis known as the Great Depression.
For more such question on stock market
https://brainly.com/question/2409521
#SPJ8
what were the advantages and disadvantages for britain at the end of the war of independence
The War of Independence, also known as the American Revolutionary War (1775-1783), marked a significant turning point in the history of the British Empire. At the end of the war, Britain experienced both advantages and disadvantages. Here are some of the key points:
Advantages for Britain:
1. Military Strength: Despite the loss of the Thirteen Colonies, Britain remained a dominant global power with a formidable navy and a large professional army. This military strength helped maintain Britain's status as a major player on the world stage.
2. Retention of Other Colonies: While Britain lost control over the Thirteen Colonies, it still maintained control over other significant colonial possessions, including Canada, the West Indies, and parts of India. These colonies continued to provide economic resources and strategic advantages.
3. Economic Recovery: Although the war had been costly for Britain, it managed to recover economically relatively quickly. It regained access to profitable trading opportunities and markets outside of North America, particularly in Asia and the Caribbean.
Disadvantages for Britain:
1. Loss of a Valuable Market: The Thirteen Colonies had been a significant market for British goods. With their independence, Britain lost direct access to this valuable consumer base, impacting its trade and economy.
2. Political Consequences: The loss in the War of Independence shook the British political establishment and raised questions about the competence and decision-making of British leaders. It led to political upheaval and a shift in attitudes toward colonial governance.
3. Global Influence: Britain's defeat in the war also had broader implications for its global influence. The American Revolution inspired other colonies and regions to pursue independence and self-determination, challenging the dominance of the British Empire in the long term.
4. Financial Burden: Financing the war had put Britain in significant debt. The cost of the conflict, combined with other financial challenges, such as maintaining a global empire, contributed to Britain's ongoing economic struggles.
It is important to note that the repercussions of the War of Independence were complex and multifaceted, and the long-term consequences for Britain and the world unfolded over time.
By the end of the 1920s, consumers
buying and the economy began to slow down.
Answer:
The first answer is stopped and the second is falling farm incomes
Explanation:
on edge
Answer:
Yes, that statement is generally true.
Explanation:
By the end of the 1920s, the US economy had experienced a period of rapid growth and prosperity, but there were signs that this growth was not sustainable. Consumer spending began to slow down, and there were also indications that businesses were overproducing goods, which would lead to a surplus of inventory and declining prices. These factors contributed to the beginning of the Great Depression, which lasted for much of the 1930s and was characterized by high unemployment, low economic activity, and widespread poverty.
Which of the following best describes the Maya civilization's religion?
A. It prevented the Maya from making scientific advances.
B. It was the only monotheistic Mesoamerican religion.
A
C. It was connected directly to Mayan government.
D. It grew out of the earlier Chavin culture.
SURMIT
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Not A because the Maya made scientific advancements
Not B because they were actually polytheistic (worshipping many gods not one)
Not D because they developed independently
C because they were closely intertwined with their political and social structures
Which statement is the most likely conclusion you can draw from the cause-
and-effect relationship shown in the diagram?
Cause
More factories are built
in cities after the
Industrial Revolution.
Effect
The population of
cities grows.
OA. Fewer people moved to the city in order to avoid the factories.
OB. More people moved to the city in order to work in the factories.
OC. Factories became more popular with American workers.
D. Factories became less popular with American workers.
The most likely conclusion that can be drawn from the cause-and-effect relationship shown in the diagram is that more people moved to the city in order to work in the factories (Option B). The diagram indicates that the construction of more factories in cities after the Industrial Revolution is the cause, while the effect is the growth of the population in cities.
The Industrial Revolution was a period of significant industrialization and urbanization, characterized by the establishment of factories and the mass production of goods. As factories were built in cities, they offered job opportunities and attracted people from rural areas in search of employment. The availability of jobs in factories, often offering higher wages than agricultural work, provided a strong incentive for individuals to migrate to cities.
The cause-and-effect relationship depicted in the diagram aligns with the historical context of the Industrial Revolution. The rapid expansion of factories led to an increased demand for labor, resulting in a significant influx of people into cities. This migration from rural to urban areas played a crucial role in the growth of urban populations during that time.
It is important to note that the other options (A, C, and D) do not accurately reflect the cause-and-effect relationship presented in the diagram. Option A suggests that fewer people moved to the city to avoid factories, which contradicts the observed effect of population growth. Options C and D introduce the notion of popularity among American workers, which is not explicitly supported by the diagram.
Therefore, based on the information provided, the most reasonable conclusion is that more people moved to the city in order to work in the factories.
for more questions on Revolution
https://brainly.com/question/16533738
#SPJ8
What building is shown under Roosevelt right arm? Why is it there
Answer: nvm found it next time don't be bummy and screenshot the pic <3
Explanation: The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The building that is shown under Roosevelt's right arm is the United States Capitol in Washington D.C. It is there because it is the seat of the United States Congress, where laws are created and passed.
In this Big Stick diplomacy political cartoon, we can observe a giant US President Roosevelt wearing his policeman uniform. On one side, below him is Europe with the European rulers and diplomats, and on the other side is the American continent with Native Indigenous people inhabit the Latin American territory. Under his right arm is the Capitol and he is holding a big stick in his right hand that says "The New Diplomacy."
Ramon dresses in baggy pants and an oversized FUBU sweatshirt. What style do his clothes reflect?
Select the best answer from the choices provided.
A.
Motown
B.
blaxploitation
C.
hip hop
D.
funk
Answer: The style of clothing described in the sentence, with baggy pants and an oversized FUBU sweatshirt, reflects the hip hop style. Therefore, the correct answer is C. hip hop.
Explanation: Hip hop fashion emerged as a distinctive style in the 1970s and 1980s, closely associated with the hip hop culture and music genre. Baggy pants and oversized clothing were popular elements of hip hop fashion during that time and have continued to be associated with the style. FUBU, in particular, is a brand that gained popularity in the 1990s within the hip hop community.
which of the following was germany permitted to keep under the terms of the treary of versailles
Helpp please friendsssss
Already did it for you in your other question. :)
Read the excerpt below from the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, a document that expressed many of the most important ideas that motivated the French Revolution. Which of the statements that follow the excerpt most accurately generalizes these ideas? 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.
2. The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty,. property, security, and resistance to oppression.
3. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body nor individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.
4. Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law.
5.Law can only prohibit such actions as are hurtful to society. Nothing may be prevented which is not forbidden by law, and no one may be forced to do anything not provided for by law.
The main idea conveyed in the excerpt from the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is that all individuals are born free and equal in their rights. Social distinctions can only be accepted if they serve the common good. Remembering these principles is crucial as we work towards building a fair and impartial society that benefits everyone. Let us keep in mind that any social distinctions must have a valid reason for being, and should contribute to the overall well-being of society. These fundamental principles should serve as our guide as we aim to create a just and equitable society for all individuals.
Explanation:
Which answer best expresses the effect of Britain passing the Tea Act of 1773?
Answer:
The passing of the Tea Act of 1773 by Britain had a significant effect on the American colonies. The act was designed to provide financial relief to the financially troubled British East India Company by granting it a monopoly on the sale of tea in the American colonies. This meant that only the East India Company could legally sell tea in the colonies, and it could do so at a lower price than smuggled tea from other sources. However, the colonists saw this as an attempt by the British government to establish a precedent for taxation without their consent, which they viewed as a violation of their rights. This led to widespread protests and boycotts of tea, culminating in the Boston Tea Party, where colonists dumped tea into the Boston Harbor in protest. The British response to the Boston Tea Party was to pass a series of harsh measures, including the Coercive Acts, which further escalated tensions between the colonies and Britain and ultimately led to the outbreak of the American Revolution. Therefore, the effect of Britain passing the Tea Act of 1773 was that it helped to spark the American Revolution by further inflaming colonial resentment towards British policies.
Antirestrictionist in the 1920s began to support civic nationalism for Southern and Eastern Europeans but continued to oppose civic nationalism for _________.
Antirestrictionists in the 1920s began to support civic nationalism for Southern and Eastern Europeans but continued to oppose civic nationalism for non-European or non-white groups.
During the 1920s in the United States, there was a growing anti-immigrant sentiment fueled by nativist and xenophobic ideologies. The restrictive immigration laws, such as the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924, aimed to limit the influx of immigrants, particularly from Southern and Eastern Europe. These measures were driven by fears of cultural, economic, and racial threats perceived by some segments of American society.
However, within this context, there were certain groups of antirestrictionists who began to support civic nationalism for Southern and Eastern Europeans. Civic nationalism emphasizes the shared values, ideals, and civic participation of individuals within a nation, regardless of their ethnic or cultural backgrounds.
Despite this evolving stance toward Southern and Eastern Europeans, antirestrictionists continued to oppose civic nationalism for non-European or non-white groups. These groups, including African Americans, Asian Americans, and other minorities, faced significant discrimination and exclusion from full participation in American society.
The opposition to civic nationalism for non-European or non-white groups reflected deep-rooted racism and a belief in the superiority of certain racial or ethnic groups. It reinforced the notion of white supremacy and the exclusion of racial and ethnic minorities from the privileges and rights enjoyed by the dominant group.
In summary, antirestrictionists in the 1920s began to support civic nationalism for Southern and Eastern Europeans due to various factors, but they continued to oppose civic nationalism for non-European or non-white groups. This disparate treatment was rooted in racial prejudice and discrimination, perpetuating the unequal treatment of marginalized communities based on their ethnicity or race.
for more questions on nationalism
https://brainly.com/question/25702229
#SPJ8
Which is the most accurate definition of industrialization
Secondary sources are valuable because they
Though the information is not firsthand, secondary sources are important because research, by necessity, is built upon the work of other scholars. Biographies, scholarly books, and journal articles are examples of secondary sources.
_______ is becoming the primary language of global communication systems. Question 14 options: Spanish English Russian Japanese
English is increasingly becoming the primary language of global communication systems due to its widespread usage and dominance in various sectors such as business, academia, and the internet.
English has emerged as the primary language of global communication systems for several reasons.
First, it is the most widely spoken language worldwide, with a large number of native and non-native speakers. This widespread usage facilitates cross-cultural communication and serves as a common linguistic ground for individuals from different countries and backgrounds.Furthermore, English has become the dominant language in various sectors.In the business world, English is often considered the international language of commerce and trade, enabling global transactions and negotiations.
In academia, a significant portion of research papers, conferences, and educational materials are published and conducted in English, making it essential for international collaboration and knowledge exchange.The internet has also played a significant role in promoting English as the language of global communication. Many online platforms, social media networks, and websites predominantly use English as their primary language, facilitating interaction and information sharing on a global scale.While other languages such as Spanish, Russian, and Japanese are important in their respective regions, English's widespread usage and dominance across various domains position it as the primary language of global communication systems.
For more questions on language
https://brainly.com/question/32089705
#SPJ8
Which two statements best summarize the constitutional philosophy of the Federalists?
The Federalists feared that a strong central government would suppress individual liberties.
The Federalists favored sharing power between the federal government and the states.
The Federalists thought the Articles of Confederation were weak and had to be replaced.
The Federalists believed the Constitution created a federal government that was too powerful.
Answer:
1. The Federalists favored sharing power between the federal government and the states.
2. The Federalists thought the Articles of Confederation were weak and had to be replaced
Explanation:
Founding Fathers who supported this:
1. James Madison
2. Alexander Hamilton
3. John Jay
4. George Washington
5. John Adams
6. Benjamin Franklin
7. Gouverneur Morris
8. Rufus King
9. John Marshall
Founding Fathers against this:
1. Thomas Jefferson
2. Patrick Henry
3. Samuel Adams
4. Richard Henry Lee
5. George Mason
6. James Monroe
7. Edmund Randolph
Founding Fathers against this:
were for STATES RIGHTS
favored a more agrarian society
were worried about a strong central government infringing upon individual liberties and the powers of the states
chatgpt
A first version of an essay is called a(n)
.
Answer: a draft
Explanation:
Answer:
[rough] draft
Explanation:
When writing an essay, its important to create an outline, or a draft, to summarize your own essay.
You can actually write the essay but don't spend forever on it. Its usually used to summarize the main points, how many paragraphs should be included, topics you want to write about, evidence, elaboration, etc.
The next step is the actual essay. This is the essay that needs to be polished and complete, whereas the rough draft can be as messy as needed.
Hope this helps! :)
What is the most important question to ask when analyzing a primary
source?
A. Who is the intended audience?
B. Is the source written in English?
C. How long is the source?
D. Has anyone else made similar sources?
A. Who is the intended audience?
Part D Imagine you're a policymaker and a European country. What questions would you want scientists to be able to answer to help you propose policy changes for the region
Answer:
some possible question that I would want scientists to be able to answer to help me propose policy changes for the region:
- How can we reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change in the region?
- How can we ensure food security and sustainable agriculture in the region?
- How can we promote innovation and competitiveness in the region's industries and markets?
- How can we foster social cohesion and inclusion in the region's diverse and multicultural societies?
- How can we enhance public health and well-being in the region?
- How can we protect and restore the region's natural resources and biodiversity?
- How can we strengthen the region's security and defense capabilities and cooperation?
Q. Drag the events from the passage into the order in which they occur.
Mrs. Mallard dies.
Mr. Mallard returns home.
Mrs. Mallard locks herself in her room.
Josephine coaxes Mrs. Mallard out of her room.
Mrs. Mallard cries uncontrollably in Josephine's arms
In the given passage, the events occur in the following order:
1. Mrs. Mallard locks herself in her room.
2. Josephine coaxes Mrs. Mallard out of her room.
3. Mr. Mallard returns home.
4. Mrs. Mallard cries uncontrollably in Josephine's arms.
5. Mrs. Mallard dies.
The sequence of events begins with Mrs. Mallard locking herself in her room. This action suggests that something significant has happened, and she needs time alone to process it. The next event is Josephine coaxing Mrs. Mallard out of her room. This indicates that Josephine is concerned about her and wants to comfort or console her. It also suggests that Mrs. Mallard may be in distress or emotional turmoil.
Following that, Mr. Mallard returns home. This event introduces a new character and raises questions about the reason for Mrs. Mallard's seclusion. The subsequent event is Mrs. Mallard crying uncontrollably in Josephine's arms. This emotional release indicates that something distressing has occurred, perhaps related to Mr. Mallard's return.
Finally, the passage concludes with the event of Mrs. Mallard's death. This unexpected twist adds a tragic element to the narrative and leaves the reader contemplating the series of events that led to this outcome.
know more about emotional here:
https://brainly.com/question/17358322
#SPJ8
Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences.
A
found in the
is a claim that sets up your position on the main argument in your essay. It is
of your essay.
In your essay, you should also address possible objections, or
to your argument.
.
This will show that you have considered other positions on your topic. These are usually discussed in the
of your essay.
An essay is a piece of writing that presents an author's perspective on a particular subject. Essays typically consist of an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Within the introduction of an essay, there is a statement that sets up the main argument. This statement is known as a thesis statement. A thesis statement is a brief, declarative statement that summarizes the central argument of an essay and is generally located at the end of the introductory paragraph. It establishes the purpose of the essay and provides direction for the reader to follow. A strong thesis statement clearly states the author's position and provides a sense of how the argument will be developed in the rest of the essay.
The body paragraphs of an essay provide supporting evidence and further elaboration on the thesis statement. Within the body paragraphs, it is essential to address potential objections to the argument or counterarguments. This demonstrates that the author has considered alternative perspectives and strengthens the overall argument. Counterarguments are usually discussed in a section of the essay called the refutation.
In conclusion, a thesis statement is a crucial component of an essay that establishes the main argument and provides direction for the reader. The body paragraphs provide supporting evidence and address potential objections to the argument, while the conclusion summarizes the main points and restates the thesis statement. A well-crafted essay provides a persuasive and compelling argument that engages the reader.
Know more about counterarguments here:
https://brainly.com/question/30637036
#SPJ8
President Taft’s foreign policy emphasized
the strength and influence of US businesses and banks.
the strength of US military forces.
careful negotiations with both allies and enemies.
building democracies in all countries.
President Taft's foreign policy emphasized the strength and influence of US businesses and banks.
This approach, known as dollar diplomacy, sought to advance American economic interests abroad by promoting and protecting investments and trade. Under President Taft, the United States aimed to extend its economic reach and secure favorable conditions for American businesses in foreign countries.
The policy emphasized using economic leverage and financial power to further American influence and stability. Taft believed that by supporting and safeguarding American business ventures overseas, the United States could foster economic growth, create job opportunities, and enhance its global standing.
Dollar diplomacy involved the deployment of diplomats, particularly those with business backgrounds, to negotiate favorable trade agreements, secure concessions, and facilitate investment opportunities. The strategy also involved providing financial assistance, loans, and support to foreign governments in exchange for economic cooperation and market access.
President Taft saw economic development as a means to promote stability and peace, as prosperous nations were less likely to resort to conflicts. By prioritizing economic interests and relying on the strength and influence of US businesses and banks, Taft aimed to strengthen the United States' position on the global stage and promote the prosperity of both the US and its trading partners.
However, dollar diplomacy faced criticism for its perceived focus on economic interests over broader diplomatic concerns and local sovereignty. Despite its shortcomings, Taft's emphasis on economic influence left a lasting impact on US foreign policy, as subsequent administrations continued to recognize the importance of economic considerations in shaping international relations.
Know more about Foreign policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/9909886
#SPJ8
We tend to think of the US Constitution and the linois Constitution as unchanging documents, but that is not entirely true Would it surprise you to know that we have had four
Constitutions since Ilinos became a state in 1818 ?
Answer:
I can confirm that it is true that the Illinois Constitution has been revised and amended multiple times since Illinois became a state in 1818. In fact, Illinois has had four different constitutions, the most recent of which was adopted in 1970.
While constitutions are often seen as relatively stable and unchanging documents, it is not uncommon for them to be revised or amended over time. This can be due to changing social, political, or economic conditions, as well as changes in legal or constitutional interpretations. In the case of the Illinois Constitution, for example, the most recent revision was prompted by concerns about corruption and the need for improved governance and accountability in state government.
Overall, the idea that constitutions are unchanging or immutable is a misconception. Constitutions are living documents that can be revised or amended as needed to reflect changing circumstances and needs. However, the process of amending or revising a constitution is usually a deliberate and carefully considered process, designed to ensure that any changes are in the best interests of the people and the state as a whole.
Indeed, it is true that Illinois has had four constitutions since it became a state in 1818.
How many constitutions has Illinois had since its statehood?Illinois has indeed undergone changes to its constitution over the years. The first constitution was adopted in 1818 and it was replaced by a second constitution in 1848. Subsequently, a third constitution was adopted in 1870 which remained in effect for over a century.
But recognizing the need for updates and reforms, a fourth constitution was drafted and approved in 1970. This latest constitution reflects the changing needs and values of the state demonstrating that constitutions are not necessarily fixed and unchanging documents.
Read more about Constitution
brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ1
How is the following scenario counted for the purposes of determining GDP? Frances buys a new oriental rug on the black market. a The item is counted in determining GDP because of spending by “C” b The item is counted in determining GDP because of spending by “I” c The item is counted in determining GDP because of spending by “G” d The item is NOT counted in determining GDP
Answer: c
Explanation:
Considering the historians use of source material, which interpretation is most valid
In the field of history, the use of source materials is critical to understanding the past and shaping historical interpretations.
The most valid interpretation is one that is supported by a wide range of credible and reliable sources, which have been examined critically by historians. When analyzing source materials, historians must consider a range of factors, including the context of the source, its credibility, and any biases or limitations that may exist.
The most valid interpretation is one that is based on a careful and critical analysis of multiple sources, which provide different perspectives on the topic being studied. Historians must consider the context of each source, such as the time period and location in which it was created, as well as the intended audience and purpose of the source.
They must also evaluate the credibility of the source, considering factors such as the author's expertise, their potential biases or agendas, and any limitations of the source, such as gaps in information or incomplete documentation.
Historians must also consider the relationship between different sources, looking for patterns, consistencies, and contradictions that may reveal different perspectives on the topic being studied. By examining source materials critically and evaluating their credibility, historians can develop a more nuanced and accurate interpretation of the past.
For more such questions on history visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ8
What resource was in high demand during the Industrial Revolution, and why was it so important?
What did Alexis de Tocqueville mean when he said “From this filthy sewer pure gold flows”? (think about what is meant by “filthy sewer” , and what does “gold” represent)
Tocqueville meant that despite the flaws and chaos of democracy ("filthy sewer"), it has the potential to produce valuable outcomes ("gold").
When Alexis de Tocqueville said, "From this filthy sewer pure gold flows," he was making a metaphorical statement about the United States and its democratic system. The "filthy sewer" refers to the chaotic and often messy aspects of democracy, including the conflicts, disagreements, and imperfections that can arise in a free society.
In this context, "gold" represents the positive outcomes, benefits, and potential of democracy. Tocqueville believed that despite the challenges and flaws inherent in democracy, it had the capacity to produce remarkable and valuable results. The metaphor suggests that even though democracy may have its shortcomings, it has the potential to generate great achievements and opportunities for progress.
Tocqueville's observation reflects his admiration for the American experiment and the unique qualities of its democratic system. He saw the dynamic and participatory nature of democracy as a source of strength and potential for societal advancement. The metaphor conveys the idea that from the seemingly chaotic and imperfect workings of democracy, valuable and significant outcomes can emerge, much like gold found amidst a dirty sewer.
Overall, Tocqueville's statement highlights his appreciation for the transformative power of democracy, recognizing that despite its challenges, it can yield remarkable and beneficial results for society.
Know more about Democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ8
Read a paragraph from an essay supporting Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan.
[1] Many people have argued that nothing could justify the president’s use of the atomic bomb because it killed so many innocent civilians. [2] Truman himself refused to drop a third atomic bomb on Japan because he was horrified by the death and devastation it had caused. [3] However, he never regretted his decision to use it in the first place. [4] Using the bomb brought an immediate end to a war that might have gone on for months or even years longer.
Which sentence states a reason?
sentence 1
sentence 2
sentence 3
sentence 4
President Taft’s foreign policy emphasized
the strength and influence of US businesses and banks.
the strength of US military forces.
careful negotiations with both allies and enemies.
building democracies in all countries.
President Taft’s foreign policy emphasized careful negotiations with both allies and enemies. Option C
William Howard Taft was the 27th president of the United States of America. He is famous for his foreign policy initiatives. He served as the president from 1909-1913, after which he was appointed as a chief justice of the supreme court of the United States.
Taft's foreign policy focused on promoting the United States as a peace mediator.The policy advocated for the need to maintain cordial diplomatic relations with all nations, both allies, and enemies. It relied heavily on diplomacy and negotiations to resolve conflicts with other countries.
Taft's policy was developed during the early years of the 20th century when many nations were struggling to establish themselves as global powers. Taft’s policy emphasized that the United States could only achieve global peace and stability if it was willing to work with other nations in a spirit of cooperation.
He believed that the United States should not use military force to impose its will on other nations but should instead use its diplomatic skills to negotiate peaceful resolutions to disputes.
He saw diplomacy as the best means of achieving global peace and prosperity.President Taft’s foreign policy did not emphasize the strength and influence of US businesses and banks, building democracies in all countries, or the strength of US military forces.
Option C
For more such questions on foreign policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27710490
#SPJ8
President Taft's foreign policy, the Dollar Diplomacy, stressed the strength and influence of US businesses and banks with the aim of promoting economic stability and order abroad that would best serve American commercial interests.
Explanation:President William Howard Taft's foreign policy, often known as the Dollar Diplomacy, primarily emphasized the strength and influence of US businesses and banks. The goal was to create stability and order abroad that would best promote American commercial interests. This approach sought to minimize the use or threat of military force and instead promote and protect American business by encouraging and supporting investment in foreign economies. Essentially, the Taft administration pursued a policy that sought to leverage economic power to generate diplomatic outcomes, a stark contrast to Teddy Roosevelt’s 'big stick' policy.
Learn more about Dollar Diplomacy here:https://brainly.com/question/5848624
#SPJ2
