Answer:
The main difference between the two systems is that in common law countries, case law — in the form of published judicial opinions — is of primary importance, whereas in civil law systems, codified statutes predominate.
Explanation:
Under the Driver Responsibility Program (DRP), a driver accumulates ___ points for every traffic conviction which does not result in a
crash.
2
6
4
8
Answer:
2 points
Explanation:
The Driver Responsibility Program (DRP) was set up to help in managing the activities of road users; mainly drivers. Drivers who broke the traffic rules were made to face the wrath of the law.
It involves assigning points to the offenders according to their offences.
A driver accumulates 2 points for every traffic conviction which does not result in a crash which includes running the traffic light. The driver is also fined.
Most aspects of civil litigation occur in the courtroom
Answer:
Most aspects of civil litigation occur in the courtroom such as the exchange of discovery materials and depositions.
Explanation:
Case law, the opinions of judges in the past cases, has little, if any, relevance to civil procedure. Continuing legal education is important for a litigation paralegal.
Answer:
Civil litigation cases can be settled outside of court or handled by way of
alternative dispute resolution(ADR)
- If the case goes to court, the issues will be decided by a judge.
- If the case is settled out of court, both parties have slightly more control over how issues are decided.
Explanation:
- Typically, civil litigation cases have one party (the plaintiff that is seeking money or some other kind of remedy (damages) from another party, whom we call the defendant.
- Non criminal cases, the nature of these cases is extremely broad and differs from client to client.
19. The Smith System is
A. О a system of safe driving.
B. O a car maintenance system.
a plan of healthy eating.
D.
a work out program.
C.
Find the right match for the decision, precedent, and influence of Brown v. Board of Education.
court decision.
Social impact.
Legal precedent.
Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Answer:
court decision: Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal precedent.: Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Social impact: Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Explanation:
In Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools infringed the Fourteenth Amendment. By doing so, it overruled the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) decision that claimed racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine was constitutional.
By establishing a precedent about “separate-but-equal” education, as well as any other segregating practices, as not equal at all, Brown v. Board of Education became one of the pillars of the civil rights movement.
Answer:
court decision: Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal precedent.: Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Social impact: Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Explanation: Got them right on edg
Which of the following would ONLY
SUPPORT the new Constitution if it
included the Bill of Rights?
A. Federalists
B. The States
C. Anti-Federalists
D. Supreme Court
