A narrator is a person that describes the events of a story to an eager audience.
He explains the scenes and gives background information and sometimes commentaries to help the readers understand a narration as he explains scene by scene.
What is Narration?This refers to the use of stories to advance a plot through the aid of a narrator.
Therefore, a narrator is a person that describes the events of a story to an eager audience.
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview to help you get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about narrations here:
https://brainly.com/question/1934766
#SPJ1
What is the best description of realistic fiction?
•
Answer:
REALISTIC FICTION is a genre consisting of stories that could have actually occurred to people or animals in a believable setting. These stories resemble real life and fictional characters within these stories react similarly to real people.
HELP
I need 80-100 words about The importance of the computer in your life
The importance of the computer in my life is very significant. I do lots of day-to-day work on my computer and often find myself using it for the majority of the day. My time spent consists of school work, games, and communicating with friends. But the biggest importance of computers in our lives is the amount of knowledge you can gain. You can learn almost anything with a computer, from tips on sky diving, how to ride a motorcycle, and even the steps to learning a new language. Even though many hate to admit it, technology and computers play a bulky part in our lives and drastically change our life, computers are very important in life!
Please please help please please help me please
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I don't see the poem but I can see the difference in options. "feel," "fall," and "near" (option A) show type of words that can relate to the meaning of, or explain progress.
Hope this helps!
How does this verb sound at the end conjugated in
simple past?
"Cancelled"
/t/
O /d/
O ed
O /id/
Answer:
Cancelled is correct...
And then I explained to him how naïve we were, that the
world did know and remain silent. And that is why I swore
never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings
endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take
sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.
Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.
Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are
endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national
borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men
and women are persecuted because of their race, religion,
or political views, that place must at that moment
become the center of the universe.
-
-Elie Wiesel, Nobel Prize acceptance speech, 1986
How does Wiesel feel about "silence" in this passage?
Answer:
A. That it causes suffering to continue
Answer:
A, causes a suffering to continue
Explanation:
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented."
What does President Lincoln describe in the lines in bold?
A.The readers who will likely disagree with his values
B. The people who rejected his offer of emancipation
C. The times he did not allow military emancipation
D. The lines in the Constitution that give him power
Answer:
he describes multiple things, I am guessing B
Explanation:
not sure ngl
Which statement best describes the purpose of planning for research?
OIt helps you figure out what you want to investigate and how.
O It will get you an A on your research paper.
O The audience will read your research plan to figure out how to read the research paper.
O Research plans have replaced the research paper in most universities.
Answer:
It helps you figure out what you want to investigate and how.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
So what is something you would want to do in the evening after work if we were dating or such ?
18. What does it mean if you have a score of 50% in any category of the 16 Personalities Test?
O A. You're in the middle of the spectrum for that characteristic.
OB. You have a turbulent disposition.
O C. You need to retake the exam since the results aren't valid.
O D. You have an assertive disposition.
Answer:
option c you need to retake the exam since the results are not valid
Explanation:
because the other options are not related to the question
Look at the examples in highlighted text in the passage. Which example show the Socratic teaching method Plato recorded?
The full question was no posted. But luckily I found it online.
Question:
Look at the examples in highlighted text in the passage. Which example shows the Socratic teaching method Plato recorded?
A.
Yes, Polemarchus, - Thrasymachus said . . . .
B.
Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, . . . .
C.
I am only repeating what you are saying, . . . .
D.
To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
Republic of Plato
Plato was a student of the Greek philosopher, Socrates. He recorded many conversations between Socrates and the men of Athens in the 5th century A.D. These conversations often took a form that has come to be known as the Socratic Method, as Socrates asked questions and added examples to lead his companions to draw correct conclusions about such concepts as virtue, beauty, friendship, truth, and justice. In the following passage from The Republic, the topic is justice.
Great or small, never mind about that: we must first enquire whether what you are saying is the truth. Now we are both agreed that justice is interest of some sort, but you go on to say 'of the stronger'; about this addition I am not so sure, and must therefore consider further.
Proceed.
I will; and first tell me, Do you admit that it is just for subjects to obey their rulers?
I do.
But are the rulers of states absolutely infallible, or are they sometimes liable to err?
To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
Then in making their laws they may sometimes make them rightly, and sometimes not? True.
When they make them rightly, they make them agreeably to their interest; when they are mistaken, contrary to their interest; you admit that?
Yes.
And the laws which they make must be obeyed by their subjects, —and that is what you call justice?
Doubtless.
Then justice, according to your argument, is not only obedience to the interest of the stronger but the reverse?
What is that you are saying? he asked.
I am only repeating what you are saying, I believe. But let us consider: Have we not admitted that the rulers may be mistaken about their own interest in what they command, and also that to obey them is justice? Has not that been admitted?
Yes.
Then you must also have acknowledged justice not to be for the interest of the stronger, when the rulers unintentionally command things to be done which are to their own injury. For if, as you say, justice is the obedience which the subject renders to their commands, in that case, O wisest of men, is there any escape from the conclusion that the weaker are commanded to do, not what is for the interest, but what is for the injury of the stronger?
Nothing can be clearer, Socrates, said Polemarchus.
Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, if you are allowed to be his witness.
But there is not need of any witness, said Polemarchus, for Thrasymachus himself acknowledges that rulers may sometimes command what is not for their own interest, and that for subjects to obey them is justice.
Yes, Polemarchus, - Thrasymachus said that for subjects to do what was commanded by their rulers is just.
Yes, Cleitophon, but he also said that justice is the interest of the stronger, and, while admitting both these propositions, he further acknowledged that the stronger may command the weaker who are his subjects to do what is not for his own interest; whence follows that justice is the injury quite as much as the interest of the stronger.
But, said Cleitophon, he meant by the interest of the stronger what the stronger thought to be his interest, —this was what the weaker had to do; and this was affirmed by him to be justice.
Those were not his words, rejoined Polemarchus.
Never mind, I replied, if he now says that they are, let us accept his statement. Tell me, Thrasymachus, I said, did you mean by justice what the stronger thought to be his interest, whether really so or not?
Certainly not, he said. Do you suppose that I call him who is mistaken the stronger at the time when he is mistaken?
Yes, I said, my impression was that you did so, when you admitted that the ruler was not infallible but might be sometimes mistaken.
Answer:
C is the illustration of the Socratic method of instruction that Plato noted.
The Socratic Method is based on a dialogue between instructor and pupils. The trainer takes the initiative by posing challenging questions.
Socrates used this type of inquiry to inspire people to question what they were given and to go beyond the apparent. The Socratic method is often used in medical and legal education today to help students understand more complicated subjects and/or ideas.
The instructor assists pupils in learning new ideas by starting with questions they already know and comprehend. This creates an environment in which students are truly learning rather than simply regurgitating information and forgetting it.
Question 2 of 15
Which sentence correctly uses one or more commas to set off a
nonrestrictive clause?
OA. Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store
owner.
OB. I decided to call Laticia who said she was available to watch the
cats.
OC. Tornadoes which form from wall clouds, are a major threat to
houses.
OD. She gave the flower to Dominic which shows that everyone
deserves love.
The sentence that correctly uses one or more commas to set off a nonrestrictive clause is Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store owner.
What is a non restrictive clause?A nonrestrictive clause is a noun that uses commas to add some information that are no in the sentence before. It give more additional details about the sentence.
Therefore, The sentence that correctly uses one or more commas to set off a nonrestrictive clause is Nela, who speaks Spanish perfectly, helped us talk to the store owner.
Learn more about nonrestrictive clause below.
https://brainly.com/question/177343
#SPJ1
A boxing champion who had won one hundred consecutive matches might be described as invincible.
True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
just because someone is described as invincible, does not mean they are.
Mike Tyson was described as invincible numerous times by himself and the media. he won 50 matches (44 of those wins being KOs) and has only lost 6. even though he seemed and was described as invincible, he still lost those 6 times.
hope this helps:)
what was the premise of edward abbey's the monkey wrench gang
Answer:
i hope that my answer will help u if its help u so please mark me as the brainlist
Explanation:
Abbey's novel The Monkey Wrench Gang (1975) recounts the exploits of a band of guerrilla environmentalists; both it and Desert Solitaire became handbooks of the environmental movement. The strain of cynicism that runs through much of Abbey's writing is leavened by a bracing prose style and mischievous wit.
Answer: A group of activists sabotages the glen canyon dam.
Explanation:
Why is a teacher's feedback valuable?
A.Teachers make good listeners.
B.Your teacher decides your grade.
C.A teacher is also a reader.
D.Every teacher is an expert writer.
Note: B and c are wrong.
Write the verbs in the correct form - verbs followed by gerunds and/or infinitives
Explanation:
try this suggested option [see the attachment].
Explain the wife's inductive reasoning for determining her husband's level of safety at work.
Premise 1: The wife assumes that her husband works a desk job.
Premise 2: _______________.
Conclusion: The wife assumes that her husband has a safe job.
The premise that explains the wife's inductive reasoning for determining her husband's level of safety at work will be,
The wife assumes that her husband's employer has insured him with retirement and health benefits.
What is inductive reasoning?When a person or an individual makes assumptions regarding an observation based on a general principle that is derived through the course of such assumptions in known as inductive reasoning.
In the given example, it can be concluded that the wife has derived a general principle that it is safe for her husband to continue his job as he has high level of personal and financial safety at his work.
Hence, the significance of inductive reasoning is aforementioned.
Learn more about the inductive reasoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/16685989
#SPJ1
what is the conflict in this scenario? what type of conflict is it?
Answer:
What scenario?
Explanation:
Write three to four sentences presenting your prediction about the main conflict in the novel based on how the characters feel about their lives
The main conflict in the novel will most likely be between the animals and the humans.
Firstly as the animals tell that they live in very poor conditions, After that, they say that human is their enemy. Lastly, they say that hunger and extra work will not be there if humans are vanished from their lives.What is the meaning of conflict?Conflict is a struggle and clash of interest which brings a serious argument which mostly leads to a prolonged disagreement.
What are the synonym and antonym of the word Conflict?The synonym of the word conflict is Disagreement or dispute and antonym of the word conflict is Agreement or accord
Hence, the correct answer is 'most likely be between the animals and the humans.'
Learn more about conflict on https://brainly.com/question/24769299
#SPJ10
What does it mean if someone say they are giving up slowly?
Answer:
It means they are losing hope/willingness slowly
Explanation:
What can an author use to give the reader more information about a
character?
OA. Information about the character's social status
B. Information about how a story's central conflict will be resolved
OC. Information about events in a story that are true
OD. Information about the author's previous works
SUBMIT
Answer:
OA
Explanation:
Because it gives us more information about the character and nothing else.
According to E. M. Forster A work of literature must provide more than factual accuracy or vivid physical reality... it must tell us more than we already know. I agree with this statement because
Literature is read for various reasons. For example, some people read literature to understand other people better. Others read it for escapism. Entertainment is another common reason. All of these reasons depend on the author providing the reader with new information that is different to their own experiences of the world. If the author does not tell the reader more than he already knows, it is unlikely that the reader will be informed or entertained by the work.
How work of literature provide something new information?A work of literature must provide us with something new in order for the time spent in consuming it be worthwhile. The Book Thief tells us of hard facts but it also provides us with something else, how a life of young child harboring a wanted man is changed after the fact. In the Lord of the Rings, a fantasy world is so vivid and wide that you yourself can navigate through it.
Thus, this could be the answer.
To learn more about literature click here;
https://brainly.com/question/23046235
#SPJ1
The family isn't too thrilled with her purchase of the house because...
Select one:
a. it will mean working twice as hard to pay the rent.
b. it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
c. it costs way too much.
d. they wanted to live in a condo.
e. it shattered Beneatha's and Walter's dreams.
The family isn't too thrilled with her purchase of the house because it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
What is the issue about?This question arises from the book titled "A Raisin in the Sun" by Lorraine Hansberry
It talks about some children whose mum bought a house to have a more better standard of living for their family but it was found to be in an all-white neighborhood.
The family is all black and they were not too thrilled with her purchase of the house because it is located in an all-white neighborhood.
Learn more about neighborhood from
https://brainly.com/question/7566863
#SPJ1
Walter tells the family that he plans to...
Select one:
a. put on a show for the Man.
b. get as much money as possible out of Lindner.
c. beat the hell out of Lindner and steal his money.
d. All of the above
e. Only A & B
Explanation:
get as much money as possible out of linder
Understanding idioms relies on the reader's knowledge of the literal denotation of the words,
not their connotation.
True or false ?
False
True
Answer:
ig true
Explanation:
one way the Maori culture most differs from the Haida culture is that the Maori culture ______
One way the Maori culture most differs from the Haida culture is that the Maori culture is made up of fierce warriors.
What was the major difference in the Maori culture and the Haida culture?The basic difference between both is that the Maori believed that the stars were created to make the sky more beautiful however the Haida had the belief that the stars are the source of light.
Maori culture was mainly concerned about state of environment and also features courage,, while the Haida myth does not.
It has been also revealed that Maori culture cares for the earth.
Learn more about the Maori and Haida culture here:-
https://brainly.com/question/5402066
#SPJ1
reading and comprehension
Answer:
Reading comprehension is the ability to process text, understand its meaning, and to integrate with what the reader already knows.
Please help me this is due today
Write a personal narrative in response to this prompt. Be sure that your narrative uses a first-person point of view and has a clear focus; uses transitions; includes characters, setting, and plot; and offers a reflection on the events described.
Prompt
Write a personal narrative about a difficult choice you had to make. Be sure that your narrative is focused and includes a thoughtful reflection.
You can make up a fictional situation to write the personal narrative, such as needing money but choosing to give it away to someone in need, as seen below.
How to write a personal narrative?The following tips and topics will help you write a personal narrative, that is, a personal story about a difficult choice you had to make:
First, make an outline of your story: the characters, the place, the the sequence of events, etc.One example of a difficult choice would be having little money, needing that money to do something, but choosing to give it away to someone in need.Since you are supposed to use a first-person point of view, write the story as if you were telling a friend about it: "One day, I had only a couple hundred dollars that I needed to pay a bill..."Provide an introduction, a body, and a conclusion, that is, tell the events in sequence: Where you were when you met the person in need; what happened next; why you decided to give away your money.In your conclusion, write the thoughtful reflection required. What did you learn from this situation?Learn more about personal narratives here:
https://brainly.com/question/18363229
#SPJ1
jackie rodriguez won the lottery jackie rodriguez bought her mother a house use a subordianting conjunction to create an adverbical clause. punctuate carefully.
WHAT IS NOUN? WHAT IS NOUN ?
=
Answer:
The name of person,things and place is called noun..
Answer:Any object, place ,name, animal
Explanation:
Read the excerpt from "Choice: A Tribute to Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr." by Alice Walker.
The public acts of Dr. King you know. They are visible
all around you. His voice you would recognize sooner
than any other voice you have heard in this century-
this in spite of the fact that certain municipal libraries,
like the one in downtown Jackson, do not carry
recordings of his speeches, and the librarians chuckle
cruelly when asked why they do not.
Mark this and return
What is the effect of the rhetorical appeal in this
excerpt?
OIt accuses the reader of not being familiar with
King's work.
OIt asks the reader to question why King is not
respected as a leader.
OIt explains why people have not heard famous
speeches.
It questions the knowledge of the people who work
in libraries.
Answer:
Olt accuses the reader of not being familiar with King's work
Explanation:
When you read the excerpt, the beginning starts off by telling you that Dr. King's works are all around you, basically informing you about him. This shows that he assumes you dont know much about Dr. King.
Answer:
its b, the other answer is wrong, now trust me if you want
