i) The rectangular coordinates (−2 sqrt3 ,2) and the polar coordinates (4, 2π/3 ) represent the same point on the plane. j) The rectangular coordinates (−5,−5) and the polar coordinates (5 sqrt2 , π/4 ) represent the same point on the plane.

The probability that the plant will not be shut down is 0.986. The probability that the plant will be shut down is 0.014.

(a) The probability that the plant will not be shut down is equal to the probability that all 10 motors tested will be non-defective. The probability of selecting a non-defective motor is 33/40 since there are 33 non-defective motors out of 40 produced.

Since the motors are selected randomly, the probability of selecting a non-defective motor for the first time is 33/40, the second time is 32/39, the third time is 31/38, and so on. The probability that all 10 selected motors are non-defective is equal to the product of these probabilities. Thus, the probability that the plant will not be shut down is:

P(All 10 selected motors are non-defective) = (33/40) × (32/39) × (31/38) × ... × (25/32)                

                                                                        ≈ 0.986

(b) The probability that the plant will be shut down is equal to 1 - P(All 10 selected motors are non-defective). Thus, the probability that the plant will be shut down is:

P(At least one selected motor is defective) = 1 - P(All 10 selected motors are non-defective)

                                                                       ≈ 0.014

Therefore, the probability that the plant will be shut down is 0.014.

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

The correct number line representation for the solution set of the inequality 3(8 – 4x) < 6(x – 5) is A number line from negative 5 to 5 in increments of 1. An open circle is at negative 3, and a bold line starts at negative 3 and is pointing to the right.

The inequality 3(8 - 4x) 6(x - 5) has the following solution set, and the following number line representation is correct:

a number line with increments of 1 from negative 5 to 5. At negative 3, an open circle is there, and a bold line that begins there and points to the right is also present.

This representation indicates that the solution set includes all values greater than negative 3. The open circle at negative 3 signifies that negative 3 itself is not included in the solution set, and the bold line pointing to the right indicates that the values greater than negative 3 satisfy the given inequality.

for such more question on inequality

https://brainly.com/question/17448505

#SPJ8

The normal approximation relies on certain assumptions about the underlying distribution, and if these assumptions are not met, the approximation may not be accurate.

To determine whether the normal approximation is appropriate, we need to consider the sample size and the distribution of the data. If the sample size is large enough (typically n > 30) and the data follow a roughly symmetric distribution, then the normal approximation can be used.

However, if the proportion of individuals holding multiple jobs is close to 0 or 1, or if the sample size is small, the normal approximation may not be valid. In such cases, it is better to use exact methods or alternative distributions, such as the binomial distribution.

Without additional information about the sample size and the distribution of the data, it is not possible to definitively determine whether the normal approximation is appropriate.

To learn more about normal approximation click here : brainly.com/question/32265736

#SPJ11

Arclength of the given curve y = 2x² + 5 on [0,2] is given by the formula L = ∫[0,2]sqrt[1+ (dy/dx)²]dx.

Curve equation is y = 2x² + 5 and interval is [0, 2].Therefore, we can write the first derivative of y isdy/

dx = 4xSubstitute dy/dx in the formula of the arclength formula.

L = ∫[0,2]sqrt[1 + (dy/dx)²]

dx = ∫[0,2]sqrt[1 + (4x)²]dxNow, we can solve this integral as follows.

let u = 4x, and

du = 4dxwhen

x = 0,

u = 0when

x = 2,

u = 8

L = (1/4) ∫[0,8]sqrt[1 + u²]du We can approximate the solution of the integral using Simpson's Rule as follows: Simpson's.

Rule equation is∫[a ,b ]f(x)dx ≈ (b-a)/6(f(a) + 4f((a+b)/2) + f(b))Using this formula, the integral of the given function is given by∫[0,8]sqrt[1 + u²]du ≈ 8/6( sqrt[1+0²] + 4(sqrt[1+16²]/2) + sqrt[1+64²] ) = 36.71 units Therefore, the arclength of the given curve y = 2x² + 5 on [0,2] is approximately 36.71 units.

To know more about Arclength visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15502429

#SPJ11

The parametric equation for the normal line to the surface at (1, 1, 1) is x = 1 + 9ty = 1 + 9tz = 1 + 20t.

The surface equation is given by x^2 + 7xyz + y^2 = 9z^3. Now, we need to find the parametric equation for the normal line to this surface at point (1, 1, 1). We can use the concept of the gradient of the surface to find the normal vector to the surface at a given point.

The gradient vector is given by the partial derivatives of the surface equation to x, y, and z. Hence, the normal vector is perpendicular to the gradient vector. For the point (1, 1, 1), the gradient vector is given by

∇f(x, y, z) = i(2x + 7yz) + j(2y + 7xz) + k(27z^2 - 7xy)

∇f(1, 1, 1) = i(2 + 7) + j(2 + 7) + k(27 - 7)

= 9i + 9j + 20k

Hence, the normal vector to the surface at (1, 1, 1) is given by 9i + 9j + 20k. Now, we need to find the parametric equation for the line passing through (1, 1, 1) and having a direction given by the normal vector (9, 9, 20). We can use the point-direction form of a line to write the equation of the normal line.

Let r(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t)) be the position vector of a point on the line. Then, the point-direction form of the line is given by r(t) = r0 + t d, where r0 = (1, 1, 1) is the given point, and d = (9, 9, 20) is the direction vector of the line. Substituting these values, we get

r(t) = (1, 1, 1) + t(9, 9, 20)

= (1 + 9t, 1 + 9t, 1 + 20t)

Hence, the parametric equation for the normal line to the surface at (1, 1, 1) is x = 1 + 9ty = 1 + 9tz = 1 + 20t.

To know more about the parametric equation, visit:

brainly.com/question/30748687

#SPJ11

Find F Such That F′(X)=X8,F(1)=23 F(X)=

To find the function F such that F'(x) = x^8 and F(1) = 23, we can integrate the given derivative and apply the initial condition.

Integrating F'(x) = x^8 with respect to x gives:

F(x) = ∫x^8 dx

Applying the power rule of integration:

F(x) = (1/9)x^9 + C

Here, C is the constant of integration.

To find the specific value of C, we use the initial condition F(1) = 23:

23 = (1/9)(1^9) + C

23 = 1/9 + C

C = 23 - 1/9

C = 207/9

The function F(x) is:

F(x) = (1/9)x^9 + 207/9

Learn more about Integrating

brainly.com/question/30900582

#SPJ11

Rounded to two decimal places, the average cost per unit when the profit is maximized is approximately $30.48 per unit.

To find the price that yields a maximum profit, we need to maximize the profit function. The profit function is given by the difference between the revenue and the cost:

Profit = Revenue - Cost

The revenue is given by the product of the price and the quantity sold, which is represented by the demand function:

Revenue = price * quantity = p * x

Given that the demand function is p = 105 - 0.5x, we can substitute this into the revenue equation:

Revenue = (105 - 0.5x) * x = 105x - 0.5[tex]x^2[/tex]

The cost function is given as C = 30x + 35.75.

Now, the profit function is:

Profit = Revenue - Cost = (105x - 0.5x^2) - (30x + 35.75)

Simplifying, we have:

Profit = 105x - 0.5x^2 - 30x - 35.75

Combining like terms, we get:

Profit = -0.5x^2 + 75x - 35.75

To find the price that yields maximum profit, we can find the x-value (quantity) that maximizes the profit. We can do this by taking the derivative of the profit function with respect to x, setting it equal to zero, and solving for x.

d(Profit)/dx = 0

-1x + 75 = 0

x = 75

So, the quantity that yields maximum profit is x = 75.

To find the corresponding price, we can substitute this value into the demand function:

p = 105 - 0.5x

p = 105 - 0.5(75)

p = 105 - 37.5

p = 67.5

Therefore, the price that yields maximum profit is $67.5 per unit.

Now, to find the average cost per unit when the profit is maximized, we can substitute the value of x = 75 into the cost function:

C = 30x + 35.75

C = 30(75) + 35.75

C = 2250 + 35.75

C = 2285.75

To find the average cost per unit, we divide the total cost by the quantity:

Average Cost = C / x

Average Cost = 2285.75 / 75

Average Cost ≈ 30.476

To know more about function visit:

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

Given that the point X = (X, Y, Z) is uniformly distributed inside a sphere of radius 1 about the origin. We need to find the probability of the following events: (a) X is inside a sphere of radius r, r> 0. (b) X is inside a cube of length 2/√3 centered about the origin.

By definition, the probability that a uniformly distributed point lies inside a given volume is proportional to the volume. Therefore, the probability that the point X lies inside a sphere of radius r is:

$$ P(X \in S_r)

= \frac{V(r)}{V(1)}

= \frac{r^3}{1^3}

= r^3 $$(b) X is inside a cube of length 2/√3 centered about the origin.The cube of length 2/√3 centered about the origin has volume (2/√3)³

= \frac{8/9}{4/3}

= \frac{2}{3} $$(c) All components of X are positive.

To solve this part, we will first find the volume of the part of the sphere of radius 1 for which all the components of X are positive.

To know more about distributed visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

The number of members using only weight machine is 6 .

Let S represents number of persons who swims

Let EB represents number of persons who exercise bikes .

Let WM represents number of persons who use weight machines.

The venn diagram is attached below .

Number of members using weight machine only = 6

Know more about venn diagram,

https://brainly.com/question/17041038

#SPJ4

a. Null hypothesis (H0): Population mean tread wear index = 200, Alternative hypothesis (H1): Population mean tread wear index ≠ 200.

b. Test statistic: t = -0.97.

c. Conclusion: Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

d. The 95% confidence interval (194.9, 202.7) suggests a potential difference in the population mean tread wear index from 200. However, the inconclusive hypothesis test does not fully support this conclusion.

a. Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses.

The null hypothesis is that the population mean tread wear index is equal to 200. The alternative hypothesis is that the population mean tread wear index is not equal to 200.

H₀: µ = 200

H₁: µ ≠ 200

b. Compute the value of the test statistic.

The test statistic is calculated as follows:

t = (x⁻ - µ) / (s / √n)

where

x⁻ is the sample mean

µ is the population mean

s is the sample standard deviation

n is the sample size

Plugging in the values from the problem, we get:

t = (198.8 - 200) / (21.4 / √18)

= -0.97

c. At alpha = 0.05, what is your conclusion?

The critical value for a two-tailed test with alpha = 0.05 is 1.96. Since the test statistic (-0.97) is not less than or equal to the critical value, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

d. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the population mean life of the LEDs.

The 95% confidence interval is calculated as follows:

(x⁻ - tα/2 * s / √n, x⁻ + tα/2 * s / √n)

where

tα/2 is the upper 1 - α/2 percentile of the t distribution with n - 1 degrees of freedom

Plugging in the values from the problem, we get:

(198.8 - 1.96 * 21.4 / √18, 198.8 + 1.96 * 21.4 / √18)

= (194.9, 202.7)

The confidence interval does not include 200, which suggests that the population mean tread wear index may be different from 200. However, since we did not reject the null hypothesis, we cannot say for sure that the population mean tread wear index is different from 200.

Does it support your conclusion?

The confidence interval does not include 200, which suggests that the population mean tread wear index may be different from 200. However, since we did not reject the null hypothesis, we cannot say for sure that the population mean tread wear index is different from 200. Our conclusion is therefore inconclusive.

To know more about the two-tailed test refer here,

https://brainly.com/question/32685290#

#SPJ11

hey!

x= -6

-15x=90

you divide the -15x by -15

to then only have x on the left-hand side and you also divide 90 by -15 because whatever you do to one side you MUST always do to the other side

90/-15 = -6

so your answer is x=-6

hope that helped

:))

The answer is:

x = -6

Work/explanation:

We're asked to solve the equation -15x = 90.

This is a one step equation.

To solve this equation, divide each side by -15:

[tex]\sf{-15x=90}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{x=-6}[/tex]

In this case, we are given the joint probability P(H,R) as 0.29 and the conditional probability P(R∣−1) as 0.72.The marginal probability P(H) is 0.49.

In probability theory, the marginal probability refers to the probability of a single event or variable independent of other variables.

To find the marginal probability P(H), we need to consider the relationship between joint probability and conditional probability. By rearranging the formula for conditional probability, we have:

P(R∣−1) = P(H,R) / P(H)

Given P(R∣−1) = 0.72 and P(H,R) = 0.29, we can substitute these values into the equation to solve for P(H):

0.72 = 0.29 / P(H)

Rearranging the equation, we have:

P(H) = 0.29 / 0.72

Calculating this expression, we find P(H) ≈ 0.49. Therefore, the marginal probability P(H) is approximately 0.49.

Learn more about equation here

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

[tex]Given function is: f(x,y) = 64 − 4x^2 − 3y^2 and the point is (3, -2).[/tex]

Therefore, we can use the following formula to find the linearization of the given function:f(x,y) ≈ L(x,y) = f(a,b) + fx(a,b)(x-a) + fy(a,b)(y-b)

[tex]Here, f(a,b) = f(3, -2) = 64 − 4(3)^2 − 3(-2)^2= 64 − 36 − 12 = 16andfx(a,b) = ∂f/∂x = -8xand fy(a,b) = ∂f/∂y = -6y[/tex]

[tex]Hence,fx(3,-2) = -8(3) = -24and fy(3,-2) = -6(-2) = 12[/tex]

Therefore,L(x,y) = f(3,-2) + fx(3,-2)(x-3) + fy(3,-2)(y+2)

[tex]Putting the values, we get,L(x,y) = 16 - 24(x-3) + 12(y+2) = 64 - 24x + 12y + 80 = -24x + 12y + 144[/tex]

[tex]Now, to estimate the value of f(2.9,-1.9), we need to use the linear approximation which is:f(x,y) ≈ L(x,y)Therefore,f(2.9,-1.9) ≈ L(2.9,-1.9)= -24(2.9) + 12(-1.9) + 144= -69.6 - 22.8 + 144= 51.6[/tex]

[tex]Therefore, f(2.9,−1.9) ≈ 51.6.[/tex]

[tex]Hence, the required linearization is L(x,y) = -24x + 12y + 144[/tex]and the [tex]estimated value of f(2.9,-1.9) is 51.6.[/tex]

To know more about the word values visits :

https://brainly.com/question/24503916

#SPJ11

The given infinite series converges to 1/(1-1/e).

The infinite series is given by the formula:∑ k=1 [infinity]​ e −k

Now, let's check whether it converges or diverges.

We know that a geometric series converges to a/(1-r) when |r|<1 and diverges otherwise.

The given series is a geometric series with a=1 and r=e^(-1).

Let us find the absolute value of r:e^(-1) > 0 since e is a positive value.

In this case, the geometric series converges since the absolute value of the ratio is less than one.

Therefore, by the formula,∑ k=1 [infinity]​ e −k = a/(1-r)= 1/(1-e^(-1)) = 1/(1-1/e)

This gives the value of the convergent geometric series which is in the form of a ratio with a denominator equal to zero.

Hence, the detail ans is that the given infinite series converges to 1/(1-1/e).

Learn more about infinite series

brainly.com/question/29062598

#SPJ11

The accumulated value after 7 years of deposits of $293.00 made at the beginning of every three months and earning interest at 3%, with the payment and compounding intervals the same is $14,073.68.

We will use the following formula to find the accumulated value of an annuity:

Accumulated Value = Payment × [{(1 + i)ⁿ - 1} ÷ i]

Where,

Payment = $293

i = (3% ÷ 4) = 0.75% per quarter (because the compounding and payment intervals are the same and made every three months)

n = 7 years × 4 quarters per year = 28 quarters

Accumulated Value = $293 × [{(1 + 0.0075)²⁸ - 1} ÷ 0.0075]

Accumulated Value = $293 × [{(1.0075)²⁸ - 1} ÷ 0.0075]

Accumulated Value = $293 × [{(1.226658) - 1} ÷ 0.0075]

Accumulated Value = $293 × [{0.226658} ÷ 0.0075]

Accumulated Value = $293 × 30.2210

Accumulated Value = $8,939.30 (rounded to the nearest cent)

The accumulated value after 7 years of deposits of $293.00 made at the beginning of every three months and earning interest at 3%, with the payment and compounding intervals the same is $8,939.30.

Finally, to get the total accumulated value, we need to add the future value of the deposits to the accumulated value:

$8,939.30 + $5,134.38 = $14,073.68 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Hence, the accumulated value is $14,073.68.

Learn more about annuity here: https://brainly.com/question/30100868

#SPJ11

The author first introduces the Raker Act to show a legislative action that was taken to solve a problem. Then the author mentions the Yosemite Grant to provide a historical correlation.

In the text, the author introduced the idea of the Raker Act to show that it was a proposed solution to the matter of the dam and the national park.

He later mentioned the Yosemite Grant by Abraham Lincoln to reference the origin of the debate which also doubles as a historical correlation.

Learn more about Yosemite Park here:

https://brainly.com/question/31058143

#SPJ1

The probability that a randomly selected person arriving at the small airport is traveling for business on a privately owned plane can be the  0.35 or 35%.

Let's denote the event of traveling on a major airline as A and the event of traveling on a privately owned plane as B. We need to find the probability of traveling for business (event C) given that the person arrived on a privately owned plane (event B).

We are given that 80% of travelers fly on major airlines (A) and 20% fly on privately owned planes (B). Additionally, 50% of those traveling on major airlines (A) are traveling for business (C), and 70% of those arriving on private planes (B) are traveling for business (C).

To calculate the probability of traveling for business on a privately owned plane, we can use the conditional probability formula:

P(C|B) = P(C ∩ B) / P(B)

P(C ∩ B) represents the probability of both events C and B occurring simultaneously. From the given information, P(C ∩ B) = 0.7 (70%). P(B) represents the probability of event B occurring. From the given information, P(B) = 0.2 (20%).

P(C|B) = 0.7 / 0.2 = 0.35 (35%)

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected person arriving at the small airport is traveling for business on a privately owned plane is 0.35 or 35%.

Learn more about conditional probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32171649

#SPJ11

A normal glycosylated hemoglobin percentage is 5.7. Test the hypothesis that for all subjects, the population value percent is 5.7. What are your hypotheses for this analysis?

Hypothesis for this analysis:Null Hypothesis: The null hypothesis for this analysis is that the population value percent of glycosylated hemoglobin is 5.7.Alternative Hypothesis:

The alternative hypothesis for this analysis is that the population value percent of glycosylated hemoglobin is not equal to 5.7. Note that since the question only asks to test whether the population value is equal to 5.7, this is a two-tailed hypothesis.

To test the hypothesis,

one could use a statistical test such as a t-test or a z-test. The appropriate test depends on the sample size and whether the population standard deviation is known.

The result of the test would allow you to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about deviation visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/31835352

#SPJ11

3.31×[tex]10^-^5[/tex] g is equivalent to 0.0331 μg which is obtained by using the conversion factor.

To convert from grams to micrograms, we need to consider the conversion factor that relates the two units. The prefix "micro-" represents a factor of [tex]10^-^6[/tex], which means there are 1,000,000 micrograms in a gram. Therefore, to convert grams to micrograms, we multiply the given value by 1,000.

In this case, we have 3.31×[tex]10^-^5[/tex] g. To convert this value to micrograms, we can multiply it by 1,000:

= 3.31×[tex]10^-^5[/tex] g × 1,000

= 3.31×[tex]10^-^5[/tex] × 1,000

= 3.31×[tex]10^-^5[/tex] × [tex]10^{3}[/tex]

= 3.31×[tex]10^(^-^5^+^3^)[/tex]

= 3.31×[tex]10^-^2[/tex]

= 0.0331 μg

Therefore, 3.31×[tex]10^-^5[/tex] g is equivalent to 0.0331 μg.

Learn more about conversion here:

https://brainly.com/question/27987238

#SPJ11

The series [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{3}{(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex] is convergent when tested using the comparison test.

Given that, [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{3}{(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex]

The test method that can be used to determine whether the above series is convergent or divergent is the comparison test. This test method states that in order to determine whether a series converges or diverges, compare it to a simpler series, whose convergence or divergence is already known.

In this case, the series to be tested can be divided by 3 to get the series  [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{3}{(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex].

This series can then be compared to the series [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}[/tex], which is a geometric series, and is known to converge. Since the series to be tested is less than the convergent series, then it must also converge.

Therefore, the series [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{3}{(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex] is convergent when tested using the comparison test.

Learn more about the convergent or divergent here:

https://brainly.com/question/31778047.

#SPJ4

The left tail of the distribution of the retirement ages extends farther than the other tail. Therefore, this distribution is negatively skewed.

The mean of the retirees' retirement ages is 65.87 years, and the median is 66 years. The mean is slightly lower than the median.

The right tail of the distribution of the incomes extends farther than the other tail. Therefore, this distribution is positively skewed.

The mean income is $46.52 (thousands of dollars), and the median income is $45.25 (thousands of dollars). The mean is higher than the median. When the distribution is positively skewed, the mean is usually greater than the median. When the distribution is negatively skewed, the mean is usually less than the median. Therefore, the median is the preferred measure of central tendency when the distribution is skewed.

The presence of extremely large or small values in the data affects the mean more significantly than the median as a measure of central tendency when the distribution is skewed.

Know more about distribution here;

https://brainly.com/question/29664850

#SPJ11

The solution to the differential equation is y(t)=40e^(15t)

The differential equation and the initial values can be written as follows:

y′+2y′−15y=0, y(0)=2, y′(0)=38

We need to apply the Laplace transform to the differential equation, and since the derivatives of the Laplace transform of the dependent variable are very common, we can employ it as follows:

L{y′}+2L{y′}−15L{y}=0

(sy(s)−y(0))+2(sy(s)−y(0))−15Y(s)=0

sY(s)−2+2sY(s)−30Y(s)=2

sy(s)−y(0)+2sy(s)−y(0)−30Y(s)=2

sY(s)−y(0)−30Y(s)=2

sY(s)−2−30Y(s)=2(sY(s)−1)−30

Y(s)2(s−15)Y(s)=2Y(0)+2Y′(0)2(s−15)

Y(s)=2(2)+2(38)2(s−15)Y(s)=80

Y(s)=80/2(s−15)

Y(s)=40/(s−15)

We can rewrite the solution in the form of a function using the Laplace transform table.

Let us use the formula L⁻¹{1/(s−α)}=e^(αt). Thus, the solution to the differential equation is:

Y(s)=40/(s−15)L⁻¹

{Y(s)}=L⁻¹{40/(s−15)}L⁻¹

{Y(s)}=40L⁻¹{1/(s−15)}L⁻¹

{Y(s)}=40e^(15t)

Therefore, the solution to the differential equation is:

y(t)=40e^(15t)

To know more about differential visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13958985

#SPJ11

Answer: This is what I got??  It doesn't feel right.

X = -5.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Let B = 12/C

Solve the other two equations for A.

Then set both equations, solved for A, equal to each other.

Substitute 12/C for B.

Cross Multiply.

The evaluation of the limits in shows that f(x, y) and fₓ(0, 0) exist at the point (0, 0).

Here, we have,

To show that f(x, y) and its partial derivatives exist at the point (0, 0), we need to use the limit definition of partial derivatives. By evaluating the limits of the difference quotients, we can determine if the partial derivatives exist.

Steps to Show Existence of f(x, y) and fₓ(0, 0):

Define the function f(x, y)

The given function is f(x, y) = (x^2 * y) / (x^2 + y^2), where (x, y) ≠ (0, 0), and f(0, 0) = 0.

Evaluate the limit for f(x, y) as (x, y) approaches (0, 0)

Consider the limit as (x, y) approaches (0, 0) of f(x, y).

Calculate the limit using the definition of the limit:

lim_(x, y)→(0, 0) f(x, y) = lim_(x, y)→(0, 0) [(x^2 * y) / (x^2 + y^2)].

To evaluate the limit, we can use polar coordinates or consider approaching (0, 0) along different paths.

Evaluate the limit of the difference quotients for fₓ(0, 0)

Calculate the limit as h approaches 0 of [f(h, 0) - f(0, 0)] / h.

Substitute the values into the difference quotient:

lim_(h→0) [f(h, 0) - f(0, 0)] / h = lim_(h→0) [(h^2 * 0) / (h^2 + 0^2)] / h = lim_(h→0) 0 / h = 0.

The evaluation of the limits in steps 2 and 3 shows that f(x, y) and fₓ(0, 0) exist at the point (0, 0).

The limit as (x, y) approaches (0, 0) of f(x, y) is 0, and the limit of the difference quotient for fₓ(0, 0) is 0.

Therefore, both f(x, y) and fₓ(0, 0) exist at (0, 0).

By following these steps and evaluating the appropriate limits, you can show the existence of the function f(x, y) and its partial derivative fₓ(0, 0) at the point (0, 0).

To learn more about function click here:

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ4

complete question:

If R is the total resistance of two resistors, connected in parallel, with resistances R₁ and R₂, then 1 1 1 + R R₂ R If the resistances are measured in ohms as R₁ = 100 and R₂ = 500, with a possible error of 0.005 ohms in each case, estimate the maximum error in the calculated value of R. ? (enter a fraction) 52²y 2² + y² Problem. 12: Let f(x, y) = . Use the limit definition of partial derivatives to show 0 that f. (0,0) and f,(0, 0) both exist. (x, y) = (0,0) (z,y) = (0,0) f. (0,0) - lim A-+0 f(0,0) - lim A-0 f(h,0)-f(0,0) h f(0, h)-f(0,0) h

Darla's mom needs to purchase 2.35 gallons of paint, and she will pay $30.48 for the paint.

For more such questions on gallons of paint

https://brainly.com/question/2734032

#SPJ8

The volume of the solid inside the upper half of a ball can be found by integrating the cross-sectional area over the range of z from 0 to R, where R is the radius of the sphere.

The cross-sectional area of the upper half of the sphere at a distance z from the equatorial plane can be found using the Pythagorean theorem.

The radius of the cross-section is given by r = sqrt(R² - z²).

Therefore, the area of the cross-section is A = pi*r² = pi*(R² - z²).

The volume of the solid is then given by the integral of the cross-sectional area over the range of z from 0 to R. So the integral that represents the volume of the solid inside the upper half of a ball is given by:

∫(0 to R) pi*(R² - z²) dz.

Note that we have not evaluated the integral, as this was not required in the question.

To know more about equatorial plane visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32153134

#SPJ11

8.1 We are supposed to differentiate the following equation with respect to the independent variable:

`y = In - 5t3+2t-3-6 Int-31²2

In order to differentiate this equation,

we need to find the derivative of the given function.

First, let's take the derivative of In(-6 Int-31²2):`d/dx [ln u(x)] = u'(x)/u(x)

Given that `u(x) = -6 Int-31²2` and `u'(x) = 0

The derivative of the function `y = In - 5t3+2t-3-6 Int-31²2

with respect to t is:`dy/dt = -15t² + 2t⁻⁴ - 6(0)

Simplifying the above expression,

we have: `dy/dt = -15t² + 2t⁻⁴

Therefore, the differentiation of y with respect to the independent variable is-15t² + 2t⁻⁴`.8.2

We are supposed to differentiate the following equation with respect to the independent variable:

g(t) = 2ln(-3t) - In e-2t-³`.

First, let's take the derivative of 2ln(-3t):

d/dx [ln u(x)] = u'(x)/u(x)`

Given that `u(x) = -3t` and `u'(x) = -3

The derivative of the function `2ln(-3t)` with respect to t is:`dg/dt = 2(-3t)⁻¹ (-3) - In e-2t-³

Simplifying the above expression, we have: `dg/dt = -6t⁻¹ - In e-2t-³

Therefore, the differentiation of g with respect to the independent variable is `-6t⁻¹ - In e-2t-³`.

To know more about differentiate visit :

https://brainly.com/question/13958985

#SPJ11

Therefore, the answer is that t ≈ 13.87 years corresponds to the year 1868.88.

If the population of squirrels on campus t years after the beginning of 1855 is given by the logistical growth function

5000 1+44e-1.49

find the time t such that s(t) = 4500.

Time, t= s(t) which when rounded to two decimal places, corresponds to the year

Let's begin by rewriting the formula for the population of squirrels on campus:

s(t) = 5000 / (1 + 44e^(-1.49t))

We need to find the time t such that s(t) = 4500.

So we substitute 4500 for s(t) and solve for t.

4500 = 5000 / (1 + 44e^(-1.49t))

Multiplying both sides by (1 + 44e^(-1.49t)):

4500(1 + 44e^(-1.49t)) = 5000

Dividing both sides by 5000:

1 + 44e^(-1.49t) = 0.9

Subtracting 1 from both sides:

44e^(-1.49t) = -0.1

Dividing both sides by 44:

e^(-1.49t) = -0.1/44

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(e^(-1.49t)) = ln(-0.1/44)

Using the fact that

ln(e^x) = x: -1.49t = ln(-0.1/44)

We need to find t, so we divide both sides by

-1.49:-1.49t/-1.49 = ln(-0.1/44)/-1.49t ≈ 13.87 years since the beginning of 1855 correspond to t.

To find the year, we add 13.87 to 1855 and round to two decimal places: 1855 + 13.87 ≈ 1868.87,

which rounded to two decimal places is 1868.88.

to know more about logistical growth function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30763887

#SPJ11