Answer:
Going to the supreme court.
Explanation:
If the state who is targeting a group of people, they have to achieve justice by going to the high court first or supreme court because supreme court has the authority to resolve disputes between two groups on the basis of justice. The supreme court has the authority to stop the state from targeting the specific group of people so the people has the option to go to the court for achieving justice.
Verify that –(-x) is the same as x , for x = −4/5
Answer:
-4/5
Explanation:
it came be two possible answer for x
Explanation:
???
-(-x) = -1×(-1×x) = -1×(-1×-4/5) = -1×(4/5) = -4/5
therefore, yes, -(-x) = x
In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brought suit against a lender, who was an alien with permanent residency status in State B, for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The lender waived personal jurisdiction. Under state procedural rules, venue was proper in the state court. The lender timely removed the action to the federal court for the Northern District of State A, which was the district in which the state court sat. The lender then timely moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, noting that, had the action initially been brought in federal court, the federal court for the Northern District of State A would not have had proper venue over this action. How should the court rule on this motion
Answer:
Hi my name is dad
Explanation:
mention a short description of make an observation , ask a question , do a background resaerch related to scientific learning .
Answer:
Explanation:
Israeli lawyer Moshe Strugano (Attorney - Moshe Strugano and Co Law firm), an expert in the “formation of offshore companies" says, observation refers to something, which we have learned by watching or checking out something and continuously thinking about it. When a person is making an observation, he is simply making a comment about something or someone, generally depends on someone's behaviour.
Which action can lead to intentional injuries?
A. Falling from a ladder at home
B. Getting in a car crash
C. Tripping on the stairs
D. Getting in a fight
Mr krabs went to the store
Answer:
yes he did
Explanation:
maybe
Answer:
and got money
Explanation:
When he turned 21, a young man who lived in State A decided to move to a city in State B. He loaded all his possessions in his truck and trailer and set out for State B. While en route, he was involved in a serious accident in State C with a woman driving an SUV, injuring both parties. Because of his injuries, the man has remained in State C for several months. However, he still intends to relocate to the city in State B as soon as he has recuperated and is able to travel. The woman, a citizen and resident of State D, is preparing to file a negligence action in federal district court against the man for the injuries she suffered in the State C accident. If the woman files the action before the man proceeds to State B, in what federal district or districts is venue proper
Answer: The District of State C and the District of State A.
Explanation:
The federal district or districts whereby the venue is proper is the District of State C and the District of State A. It should be noted that the federal venue in a civil action will be proper in the district whereby part of the events brought about the claim that occurred.
In this case, the proper venue is the District of State C as a substantial part of the events brought about the claim that occurred there. Also, during the time that the accident took place, the domicile of the man was in State A.
A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based on state law, alleging that she was severely burned because the top flew off the pressure cooker during operation. Under the state law, a jury verdict does not have to be unanimous. However, a specific rule under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directly conflicts with the state law and provides that jury verdicts in federal court must be unanimous. Which statement correctly presents what law the federal judge should apply regarding the jury verdict
Answer:
The federal rule must apply in this case.
Explanation:
A federal court must, in fact, apply to state law when it has a case that was initiated under state law. However, when this case is also based on diversity of citizenship, a federal statute, or a federal rule, as shown in the case above, the court must apply the federal rule, provided that procedural rule does not interfere or deny any right, as shown in the case of the question above. Therefore, the court must apply federal rule.
You have been asked to draft a document related to evidence-gathering that contains details about personnel in possession and control of evidence from the time of discovery up through the time of presentation in court. Which type of document is this
write any five advantage of good company for disadvantage of bad company ?
Explanation:
Bad company does not have a trustworthy feeling for his/her relationships. They want to do things in their own ways. They don't respect other people's emotions and opinions. They always wish to get things using unfair ways.Advantages of a company include that: liability for shareholders is limited. it's easy to transfer ownership by selling shares to another party. shareholders (often family members) can be employed by the company.
Which of these is the best reason to explain why candidates for office hire campaign staff to run their campaigns?
Campaigns are complex undertakings, and candidates must hire staff members to manage specific activities
If candidates for office lose their runs for office, they can blame staff members for what went wrong
O Candidates hire staff members because campaigns provide an opportunity to give jobs to family members and
friends
O Campaigns are run according to accepted rules, and one of those rules is that candidates for office must hire
campaign staff
Answer:
Campaigns are complex undertakings, and candidates must hire staff members to manage specific activities
If candidates for office lose their runs for office, they can blame staff members for what went wrong
this is your answer
The best reason to explain candidates for office hire campaign staff to run their campaigns are Campaigns are complex undertakings, and candidates must hire staff members to manage specific activities. Thus the correct option is A.
What are campaigns?A campaign is a concerted effort to attain a specific aim or target. Campaigns are frequently used in politics and social movements to promote a specific agenda or cause.
Since campaigns are complex endeavors requiring a wide range of talents and expertise, candidates for office frequently engage campaign personnel to conduct their campaigns.
Hiring campaign workers can also save candidates time and money by allowing them to delegate specific chores and responsibilities to people with specialized skills and experience.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the political campaign, from
brainly.com/question/25819380
#SPJ5
1. What is Ms. Roman’s employment background?
Ms. Roman's employment background is that she's been a police officer for 25 years.
2. What statistics from police academies in the state of New Jersey were alarming to Ms. Roman?
The statistics from the police academies in the state of New Jersey that were alarming to Ms. Roman are the rates between 65 and 80 percent of women are failing due to the physical fitness test.
3. What was a major reason for women failing at the police academies?
A major reason for women failing at the police academies are recruits needing to pass the fitness exam within 10 short workouts and only have three weeks to try to pass due to a new policy.
4. What had these police recruits been required to do in order to reach the point in the process that allowed them to take the physical fitness test?
Police recruits were required to pass very lengthy background checks, medical exams, psychological exams, and clearly quit any other job.
5. What data does Ms. Roman share about women serving as police officers? What data does she share about women working as police chiefs?
The data Ms. Roman shares about women serving as police officers is that less than 13% of the police officers hadn't changed much in the past 20 years. Only 3% of women were police chiefs in 2013.
6. How are other countries doing when it comes to female representation in the police force compared to the US?
When female representation in the police force compares to the US some countries have nearly twice as many women police officers.
7. According to research, what are some positive results to having female police officers on the force?
Positive results to having female police officers on the force include female police officers tending to have more of a positive influence, great job performance, trustworthiness, and fairness in the police force.
8. What does Ms. Roman define as the main problem with the different policy agencies and their standards?
Ms. Roman defines that the main problem in different policy agencies and their standards is that the the differing policy agencies and their standards is that the main focus is on physical strength.
9. What should police academies also focus on, aside from physical strength, when recruiting officers?
Other than physical strength police academies should focus on problem-solving skills, community policing, and interpersonal communication skills.
10. What are some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force? How must the testing process be changed to ensure women are not unfairly excluded from the force?
Some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force could be good salary package and suitable environments. When it comes to good salaries for the police force and an environment that feels safe and suitable with lack of sexual harassments then more women will join, some just cause they want to not for the "encouragement". The testing process could be conducted under fair supervision in order to ensure that women are not being unfairly justed from the force.
The term "uppers" refers to .
A. depressants
B. stimulants.
C. sedatives.
Answer:
C. sedative
Explanation:
This is also referring to something above
Workers should not get involved in policy decisions about his/her rights because the government is the one making those decisions.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
In terms of workers' rights and responsibilities, an employee is given the right to be a part of the decision-making process. This does not mean that every worker has to be a member of the policy-making committee but that he/she can participate in the process through different means.
Pertaining to one's rights, everyone has the right to express his/her opinions as it refers to the person(s)'s individual right. And whatever decision that's been taken or made will affect him/her. So, it is important that workers should get involved in the policy decisions about his/her rights. The government does not have the right to directly impose any decisions about the workers without consulting them.
Thus, the statement is false.
observe a farming system in your neighbourhood and write short notes on it.
Answer:
Observing farming activities around this neighborhood are poor and traditional type of farming because it is rural based.
Explanation:
Farming system around this neighborhood is traditional where there's a use of cow and donkeys. People tend to practice mono culture which decrease soil fertility
what is Employment equity act?
Employment eguity act is the act that states that each person whether male or female shall get equal opportunity to do work according to their knowledge and each individual shall get equal salary according to their job...........
What are star made of?
Who is the current prime minister of Nepal?
What is Lawyer?
Answer:
1) stars are made of hydrogen and helium that produce light and heat from the churning nuclear forges inside their cores
2) the current prime minister of Nepal is Sher Bahadur Deuba
3) A lawyer is a person who practices or studies law; an attorney or a counselor.
Hope this helps you, if it does plz mark me as BrainliestThx, Have a wonderful day!! :)True or false: Work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway.
20
It's true that work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway. Thus, option A is correct.
What are speed limits?Speed limits are there set to enforce that the speed of the vehicle should be according to the prescribed speed limit. the limit is decided by the transportation federation, and they can set the limits according to the road and the way. the speed can be different for highways, city roads, and freeways. The speed limit can be different depending on the vehicle, i.e, different for cars, trucks, and Scotty.
Work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway because maybe there is some construction work left or the construction things are kept there. It can also be that is the specified limit of speed in itself only. Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about speed limits, here:
https://brainly.com/question/5559383
#SPJ2
Which describes the Securities and Exchange Commission?
unconnected to
government
government corporation
government contractor
government agency
Answer:
Government agency.
Explanation:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal agency of the government established to monitor and regulate the securities market. The SEC is tasked with regulating a fair and just functioning of the exchange market.
Created in 1934, the SEC helps regulate the market and protects investors from getting into the wrong business. And though it is a federal agency, it is also capable of bringing civil actions against any lawbreakers and any criminal cases that may be detrimental or dangerous for the country.
Thus, the correct answer is the fourth option.
Article VII of the constitution describeds?
Answer:
how the U.S Constitution would be ratified.
Explanation:
A constitution refers to a set of written laws and principles which is typically used to determine the power and authority of the government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens.
Hence, the Constitution is a formally written document that contains the set of laws that we live by in the United States of America. It guarantees certain rights to the federal government and the states such as right to taxation, regulate interstate commerce, declare war, borrow money, provide for the military forces, etc.
Basically, the Constitution accords powers to the national or federal government and these includes; enumerated or delegated, reflected, and concurrent powers.
Article VII is an article of the US Constitution and it is referred to as special state ratifying convention. Thus, it describes the ratification process for the Constitution of the United States of America by establishing that the Constitution shall be enacted by the U.S Congress to become the official law of the ratifying states when it's ratified by nine (9) states among the thirteen (13) states.
On the 7th of December, 1787, Delaware became the first state to ratify the U.S Constitution while New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify it, doing so on the 21st of June, 1788.
In conclusion, Article VII of the Constitution of the United States of America describes how the Constitution would be ratified by the states.
A plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused by the defendant. The plaintiff sued the defendant for his injuries. In preparation for trial, the plaintiff's attorney hired a doctor to examine the plaintiff. At trial, the defense attorney attempts to call the doctor as a witness to testify about statements the plaintiff made in confidence to the doctor about his injuries, which the doctor then communicated to the plaintiff's attorney. The state recognizes only the common law privileges. Should this testimony be admitted
Answer:
Yes! The Courtroom is the only place where the "Doctor/Patient Confidentiality" does not uphold.
What is the difference between conservative and Liberal Supreme Court Justices?
Each Justice of the United States Supreme Court has four law clerks. Law clerks are recent law school graduates who serve for one year as a legal assistant to a Supreme Court Justice. Law clerks are very important to the work of the Court. In each chamber, the Justice and the four clerks form a close-knit intellectual family. It is with their law clerks that Justices are able to speak openly and to engage in a candid give-and-take, testing ideas, theories and approaches as they consider the merits of each case. Moreover, in most chambers the law clerks play a central role in preparing drafts of a Justice's opinions.
hey I'm trying to reachout for someone and that person knows who it is and if you see this message please, comment below and my question is Misdemeanors do not include any violent crimes or crimes with the potential to harm others.
Is the previous statement true or false?
Answer:
Your answer is False
Explanation:
mark Me brainliest if my answer Is correct
The purpose of hazard lights is to _____.
A. notify emergency
vehicles to stop and help you
B. warn other drivers to stay away from you
C. show other drivers that your vehicle is disabled
D. show other drivers where your vehicle is
Answer:
C. show other drivers that your vehicle is disabled
Explanation:
A vehicle's hazard lights are there to show other drivers that your vehicle is disabled. In other words, it lets all the other drivers passing near you that you are having an emergency situation with your vehicle and to be careful when passing near you. Regardless of what the nature of your emergency is, the drivers will see the four turn signals blinking at the same time and know to be careful when passing your vehicle. The emergency could be electrical problems, flat tire, mechanical problems, no brakes, bad visibility, etc.
Which situation always warrants calling 911 when someone is injured?
A. Moving the person may cause injury
B. A bone could be broken
C. The hospital is more than 10 miles away
D. You are alone with the injured person
Answer:
A
Explanation:
This road sign means:
1: The road ahead turns sharply right then sharply left
2: Winding road ahead
3: A road joins from the left.
4: Sharp right turn
Answer:
4 sharp right turn
hope this helps
have a good day or night
The given road signs depicts Sharp right turn. So option D is correct among all given options.
What is road signs?Road signs, often known as traffic signs, are posted along the side of roadways or above them to inform and direct drivers. Simple wooden or stone milestones were the oldest types of signs. Later, directional signs with arms were developed, such as the fingerposts used in the United Kingdom and their wooden equivalents in Saxony.
Since the 1930s, as traffic volumes have increased, many nations have adopted pictorial signs or have similarly standardized and simplified their signs in an effort to overcome linguistic barriers and improve traffic safety.
Such pictorial signals are typically based on international norms and use symbols (often silhouettes) in place of words. These road signs were initially created in Europe and have since been adopted in varied degrees by the majority of nations.
Thus International agreements like the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals have aided in bringing traffic signs in different nations closer together. To minimize confusion, some nations have also (in part) unilaterally adopted policies from other nations.
Learn more about road sign:
https://brainly.com/question/28089398
#SPJ2
Are twelve jurors enough to provide an adequate and fair representation of society for the purpose of determining an accused person's guilt or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt? Explain why or why not. Include examples.
Answer:
yes, because of the wisdom of the crowd
Explanation:
crowdsourcing is an example
wikipedia: "Trial by jury can be understood as at least partly relying on wisdom of the crowd, compared to bench trial which relies on one or a few experts"
sweet number is around 11 (npr)
wikipedia: it's done by sometimes "taking the average over a large number of responses"
examples : Congress, supreme court, board of directors
how do Christians play the role of John the Baptist
Answer:
Just a cousin of Jesus who is a few months older,he spend his time baptizing then he baptized his cousin and then there was a dove who spoke on behalf of God.he died because some king was trying ......his head cut off.
Explanation:
Sorry just watch videos on You tube about his life
1. If your vehicle breaks down while moving, pull off the road as far as
ten feet
the shoulder
the ditch
possible
Read the quote and select the correct answer.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress
may from time to time ordain and establish.
-US Constitution Article III, Section
Answer:B
Explanation:See FISA Court
It's a secret Court for investigation of information technology that it is secret is counter to public good because it takes all transparency out of the dealings of our elected officials and strips the judicial of any oversite which is the intended function of the checks and balances system set up by the constitution. Our judicial review power has been systemically legislated to have no teeth. Because of the corrupt corporations and the bought politicians who care only for money and power instead of their constituents or the United States, our precious constitution is now a meaningless hollow document. So sad
Tyler, a citizen of Utah, files a lawsuit in federal court against MegaCorp. Tyler's claim is based upon a violation of federal law. The federal district court has original jurisdiction, which means that Group of answer choices federal cases usually originate in federal district courts. the court has unusual procedural rules. the court has a unique method of deciding whether to hear a case. the subject matter of the suit is interesting and new.
Answer:
Because the Federal District Court has original jurisdiction, it can choose to take the case or not. It takes precedence over all.
Due to its initial jurisdiction, the Federal District Court has the option of taking the case or not. It has precedence over everything.
What is a federal court?District courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the ultimate level of appeal in the federal system, are the three primary levels of the federal court system. In the entire nation, there are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court.
Because federal courts only have limited jurisdiction, they can only consider matters that are specifically allowed by the US Constitution or federal law. Original jurisdiction is the term used to describe this form of authority.
The authority of state courts and federal courts may overlap, allowing some matters to be brought in both courts. In the beginning, the plaintiff gets to decide whether to file the action in a state or federal court.
Learn more about federal courts, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ2
