In Western Europe, scientific and philosophical interest in the concept of race began to develop during the 18th century.
This was largely due to the increasing exploration and colonization of other parts of the world, which led to encounters with different racial and ethnic groups. Europeans began to categorize these groups based on physical and cultural characteristics, leading to the development of racial taxonomies. These taxonomies were often used to justify European colonialism and imperialism, as they were seen as evidence of European superiority over other races. One of the key figures in the development of scientific racism in Europe was the French philosopher and naturalist Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon. In his 44-volume work "Histoire Naturelle", Buffon argued that there were inherent physical and intellectual differences between different races. He believed that Europeans were the most superior race and that other races were inferior in various ways. This work was widely influential in Europe and contributed to the development of scientific racism in the region.
Learn more about philosophical interest here: brainly.com/question/2759841
#SPJ11
The central pillar of a portal that stabilizes the structure. It is often elaborately decorated.
The central pillar of a portal plays a critical role in stabilizing the entire structure, which is why it is often given considerable attention when it comes to design and decoration.
This pillar not only adds strength and support to the portal but also serves as a decorative element that can enhance the overall aesthetic appeal of the structure.
In many cases, the central pillar is elaborately adorned with intricate carvings, patterns, or other embellishments that can add to its visual appeal.
This attention to detail ensures that the portal not only serves its functional purpose but also makes a lasting impression on those who view it.
Ultimately, the central pillar is an essential element in the design of a portal, and its importance cannot be overstated.
Know more about decoration here:
https://brainly.com/question/21496563
#SPJ11
in the 1840s, the dominant immigrant group in new england textile mills was the
The dominant immigrant group in New England textile mills in the 1840s was the Irish.
However, it is important to note that there were also significant numbers of French Canadians and English immigrants working in the mills during this time.
The Irish were attracted to the mill jobs due to the promise of steady work and wages, as well as the opportunity to escape the poverty and famine in Ireland.
The mills provided a source of income and stability for many Irish families, but the working conditions were often harsh and dangerous.
Despite these challenges, the Irish continued to work in the mills and played a significant role in the growth of the textile industry in New England.
Know more about immigrants here:
https://brainly.com/question/17141328
#SPJ11
Which of the following scenarios is considered illegal according to the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
a. Segregating employees on the basis of their educational qualifications.
b. Segregating employees on the basis of their ethnicity.
c. Segregating employees on the basis of their work experience.
d. Segregating employees on the basis of their skill sets.
Segregating employees on the basis of their ethnicity is considered illegal according to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Therefore, the correct answer is option b.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark piece of legislation that prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in employment, education, and other areas of American society.
Segregating employees on the basis of their ethnicity violates the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against individuals on the basis of their race or national origin.
This type of discrimination can take many forms, including hiring or promotion practices that unfairly favor one group over another, or policies that restrict certain groups from accessing certain jobs or positions.
While segregating employees on the basis of their educational qualifications, work experience, or skill sets may be seen as discriminatory in some circumstances, these factors are not protected under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Employers are generally allowed to consider these factors when making hiring and promotion decisions, as long as they do not use them to discriminate against employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
In summary, segregating employees on the basis of their ethnicity is considered illegal according to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while segregating employees on the basis of their educational qualifications, work experience, or skill sets may not be illegal unless they are used to discriminate against employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Therefore, the correct answer is option b.
To know more about Civil Rights refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29698284#
#SPJ11
RESEARCH TOPIC "The Holocaust is one of the biggest tragedies of the 20th century. It has plundered an entire nation, has taken millions of lives and has changed the history of mankind" In the context of the above statement, evaluate the impact of pseudoscientific Ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946. a full essay
The Holocaust was one of the most devastating tragedies of the 20th century, during which Nazi Germany systematically murdered six million Jews, as well as millions of other individuals.
What happened in the Holocaust ?At the heart of the Holocaust lay an extreme manifestation of racism that perceived Jewish people as a dehumanized race to be completely eliminated. This belief was inextricably linked to flawed standards of racial classification which surfaced in Europe during the first decades of the twentieth century.
The justification given by scientists associated with the Nazi party for this misguided reasoning derived from genetics and biology, but these arguments were fallacious considering they lacked empirical evidence.
Fascist researchers claimed Jews formed a distinct group that arose in the Middle East before spreading all over Europe, supposedly being biologically underdeveloped compared to other races due to inferior intelligence, potential criminal tendencies, and even physical impairments.
For those persecuted based on this pseudo-scientific framework, particularly among German Jews living under Nazi rule, it triggered a gruesome wave of oppression culminating in millions of atrocities committed throughout the Second World War.
Find out more on the Holocaust at https://brainly.com/question/12962
#SPJ1
Question 2 of 10
Chinese immigrants frequently faced discrimination because they:
A. made higher wages than native-born American workers.
B. held different jobs than native-born Americans did.
C. demanded equal pay and treatment for equal work.
D. were willing to work long hours for low pay.
Answer:
C. demanded equal pay and treatment for equal work.
Explanation:
C. demanded equal pay and treatment for equal work.
Chinese immigrants faced discrimination in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly in the West Coast, due to various factors such as cultural and linguistic differences, competition for jobs, and xenophobia. One of the main reasons for discrimination against Chinese immigrants was their demand for equal pay and treatment for equal work. Many Americans feared that Chinese workers would take their jobs and drive down wages, leading to resentment and discrimination against them. Additionally, Chinese workers were often subjected to long hours, low pay, and unsafe working conditions due to their limited options and vulnerable position in the labor market. However, it was their demand for equal treatment that was a major factor in the discrimination they faced.
The military conquests of the late roman republic brought an influx of foreign and into the roman milieu
The military conquests of the late Roman Republic introduced foreign influences into the Roman culture and way of life.
The late Roman Republic was marked by a period of extensive military conquests that expanded the Roman Empire's territorial holdings. These conquests brought about significant cultural and social changes within the Roman milieu, including the introduction of foreign influences. The acquisition of new territories meant that the Romans were exposed to a wide range of cultures and traditions, which had a profound impact on their way of life. For instance, the incorporation of Greek culture into Roman society led to the adoption of new art forms, architectural styles, and philosophical ideas. Similarly, the influx of foreign languages, religions, and customs contributed to the development of a diverse and cosmopolitan Roman culture.
Learn more about late Roman Republic here:
https://brainly.com/question/28177874
#SPJ11
How did the absence of most animals capable of domestication affect developments in the Americas?
A) Few pastoral societies developed.
B) Agriculture did not develop independently.
C) Metallurgy was more highly developed.
D) A plow-based farming system developed.
Answer:B) Agriculture did not develop independently.
Explanation:
Which U.S. president promoted his policy agenda to the American people through "fireside chats"?
A) Warren Harding
B) Franklin D. Roosevelt
C) Harry Truman
D) John F. Kennedy
The U.S. president who promoted his policy agenda through "fireside chats" was Franklin D. Roosevelt, option B.
These chats were a series of radio broadcasts made by President Roosevelt between 1933 and 1944, where he spoke to the American people in a conversational tone about his policies and initiatives. These broadcasts were very popular and helped Roosevelt to connect with the people and gain their support. Through these chats, he was able to explain complex issues and policies in a way that was easily understandable to the common people. Thus, Franklin D. Roosevelt used the "fireside chats" as a tool to communicate his ideas and policies to the American people in a direct and effective way.
Learn more about fireside chats here:-brainly.com/question/30774053
#SPJ11
what were the two views in this country prior to the civil war regarding the sovereignty of the states?
Prior to the Civil War, there were two main views in the United States regarding the sovereignty of the states: the states' rights view and the nationalist view.
The states' rights view held that the states were sovereign entities that had voluntarily entered into a union for their mutual benefit. Under this view, the federal government had limited powers and was subject to the authority of the states. Proponents of states' rights argued that states had the right to nullify federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional, and some even argued that states had the right to secede from the union.
The nationalist view, on the other hand, held that the federal government was the ultimate authority in the United States and that the states were subordinate entities. Proponents of this view argued that the federal government had broad powers under the Constitution to regulate interstate commerce and to promote the general welfare, and that the states were not empowered to challenge federal authority.
These two views came into conflict over a number of issues, including tariffs, slavery, and states' rights to secede. Ultimately, the Civil War was fought in large part over the question of whether states had the right to secede from the union, with the nationalist view prevailing and establishing the supremacy of the federal government over the states.
To learn more about Civil War click here : brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ11
Since London is north of Paris and South of Edinburgh, it follows that Paris is south of Edinburgh.
A. Deductive
B. Valid
C. sound
The given statement, "Since London is north of Paris and south of Edinburgh, it follows that Paris is south of Edinburgh," can be classified as both valid and sound.
A valid argument means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. In this case, the premises (London is north of Paris and south of Edinburgh) are true, and they logically lead to the conclusion (Paris is south of Edinburgh).
What is sound argument?A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. Since the premises are indeed true and the argument is valid, this statement is also considered sound.
Therefore, the answer is both option b. and c.
To know more on argument visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31218461
#SPJ11
Who guided the author while she wrote, Alaska, A Land in Motion?
The author of "Alaska, A Land in Motion" was guided by her own experiences and research while writing the book.
While writing "Alaska, A Land in Motion," the author was guided by various sources and influences.
Firstly, extensive research played a crucial role in providing the author with a deep understanding of the subject matter.
This research likely involved studying books, articles, and academic sources on Alaska's history, geography, and culture.
Additionally, the author may have sought guidance from experts in the field, such as historians, geographers, and indigenous community members, who could provide valuable insights and firsthand knowledge.
The author's own experiences and observations while visiting Alaska might have also influenced the writing process.
By immersing herself in the land, interacting with locals, and witnessing the dynamic nature of Alaska, the author could capture the essence of the place in her writing.
For more such questions on Alaska:
https://brainly.com/question/2167293
#SPJ11
why was the united states involved in conflicting arms deals and covert operations in the middle east throughout the 1970s and 1980s?
The United States became involved in conflicting arms deals and covert operations in the Middle East throughout the 1970s and 1980s for a variety of reasons, including:
Cold War politics: The Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union was a major factor in U.S. involvement in the Middle East during this period. The U.S. sought to prevent the spread of Soviet influence in the region and to support friendly governments that would align with American interests.Oil interests: The Middle East is a major source of oil, and U.S. involvement in the region was often driven by a desire to protect American access to this vital resource.Strategic alliances: The U.S. formed alliances with several countries in the Middle East, such as Saudi Arabia and Israel, that were seen as important partners in the region.Conflicts and instability: The Middle East was and continues to be a region marked by conflicts and instability, and the U.S. often became involved in attempts to stabilize the situation or to support certain factions or governments.Some of the major events that led to U.S. involvement in the Middle East during this period include the Iranian Revolution in 1979, the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, and the Gulf War in 1990-1991. The specific motivations and goals of U.S. involvement in each of these events varied, but overall, the U.S. sought to protect American interests and maintain stability in the region.
what changed for europeans as a result of the peace of westphalia in 1648?
As a result of the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, Europeans experienced a shift from religious-based conflicts to a more secular international system.
The Peace of Westphalia, a series of peace treaties, marked the end of the Thirty Years' War and the Eighty Years' War, which had been fueled by religious conflicts between Protestants and Catholics. The treaties established the principle of state sovereignty and recognized the right of each state to determine its own religion. This led to a decline in religious interference in political affairs and paved the way for a more secular approach to international relations.
The Peace of Westphalia established the concept of a balance of power among European states and laid the foundation for the modern nation-state system. It was a significant turning point in European history, bringing about a new era of diplomatic relations and political order.
Learn more about Peace of Westphalia
https://brainly.com/question/8046128
#SPJ4
in the second half of the twentieth century, the kind of tensions illustrated by the two sources would most directly lead to the emergence of which of the following in postcolonial asian and african states? responses communist movements communist movements popular movements advocating the restoration of colonial rule popular movements advocating the restoration of colonial rule movements advocating for regional autonomy movements advocating for regional autonomy famines and epidemics
In the second half of the twentieth century, the kind of tensions illustrated by the two sources would most directly lead to the emergence of movements advocating for regional autonomy in postcolonial Asian and African states.
These tensions, such as political, economic, and social issues, often resulted from the abrupt transition from colonial rule to self-governance.
As a response, people in these postcolonial states sought to regain control over their resources and decision-making processes by advocating for regional autonomy.
This allowed them to address their specific needs and concerns more effectively while preserving their cultural identities.
Know more about regional autonomy here:
https://brainly.com/question/26271084
#SPJ11
T/F: the sussex pledge was a german agreement not to torpedo passenger or cargo ships without warning.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Sussex pledge was a German agreement during WWl
Based on the program, which group was NOT represented at the March on Washington?
Jewish Leaders
Labor Union Leaders
Civil Rights Leaders
Political Leader
Option(3) Civil Rights Leaders is the correct answer and Civil Rights Leaders was not represented at the march on washington.
The March on Washington was a historic event in the American civil rights movement, where more than 250,000 people gathered at the National Mall in Washington, D.C. to demand an end to racial segregation and discrimination, and for economic and social equality for all Americans.
The march was organized by a coalition of civil rights, labor, and religious organizations, and it included a diverse group of participants from across the country.
Among the groups that were represented at the march were civil rights leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., labor union leaders such as Walter Reuther of the United Auto Workers, and Jewish leaders such as Rabbi Joachim Prinz. Political leaders such as John Lewis, who later became a U.S. Congressman, also spoke at the march.
Based on historical records, it appears that all of these groups were represented at the March on Washington. However, it is possible that some groups were underrepresented or not represented at all, depending on the specific perspectives and priorities of the organizers and participants.
for similar questions on washington
https://brainly.in/question/54635027
#SPJ11
Based on the program, which group was NOT represented at the March on Washington in the following options?
Jewish LeadersLabor Union LeadersCivil Rights LeadersPolitical Leaderwhat occurred as a result of the economic prosperity the american colonies had experienced by 1750?
By 1750, the American colonies had experienced significant economic prosperity. The colonies had been producing crops such as tobacco, rice, and indigo, which were sold to Europe for high profits.
The colonies also traded with other parts of the world, including the West Indies and Africa, which contributed to their economic growth. This prosperity led to the growth of cities, such as Boston, Philadelphia, and New York City, and the emergence of a wealthy merchant class.
However, this prosperity also led to tension between the colonies and Britain, as the British government sought to increase its control over the colonies' economic affairs through measures such as taxes and trade regulations. This tension eventually culminated in the American Revolution, as the colonies sought to establish their own independent nation free from British control.
Learn more about American Colonies here:-brainly.com/question/30924696
#SPJ11
john boehner resigned from his position as speaker of the house in 2015 because of
John Boehner resigned from his position as Speaker of the House in 2015 because of political pressures and internal conflicts within the Republican Party.
What happened to him?He faced opposition from the more conservative members of his party who believed that he was too willing to compromise with Democrats.
Additionally, Boehner faced difficulties in passing major legislation, such as immigration reform and a budget deal.
His resignation was seen as a way to avoid a potential vote of no confidence and to allow the party to regroup and potentially find a new leader who could unite the party and pass important legislation.
To know more about Legislation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15522014
#SPJ11
the political era of american policing, 1840s to 1930s, was characterized by:
The political era of American policing, spanning from the 1840s to the 1930s, was characterized by close ties between the police and political organizations.
During this period, police departments were often heavily influenced by political machines and political bosses who used the police to maintain their power and control.
Corruption and bribery were prevalent, with officers often engaging in illegal activities or favoring specific political groups in exchange for personal gain or political support.
Police officers were often appointed based on political connections rather than merit, leading to a lack of professionalism and accountability.
Additionally, police practices focused more on maintaining social order and addressing public disorder rather than crime prevention or community service.
This era marked a transition towards a more professional model of policing as the country moved into the reform era in the mid-20th century.
Learn more about Corruption here:
https://brainly.com/question/15270178
#SPJ1
In the Civil War, the number of deaths for every 100,000 of the population was
A. 500.
B. 1,000.
C. 2,000.
D. 4,000.
E. 5,000.
Answer:
C. 2,000
Explanation:
In the Civil War, the number of deaths for every 100,000 of the population was 2,000
Chinese philosophers can be compared to Greek philosophers?
There are some similarities and differences between Chinese and Greek philosophy, both traditions have contributed greatly to our understanding of the world and continue to be studied and debated today.
Both cultures developed a tradition of philosophical thought that was influential in their respective societies and still holds relevance today.
One of the main similarities is that both Chinese and Greek philosophers sought to understand the nature of the universe and the human condition.
They developed systems of thought to explain the world around them and offer guidance on how to live a fulfilling life.
Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism are some of the most influential schools of thought in Chinese philosophy, while Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics are some of the most famous Greek philosophers.
Another similarity is that both Chinese and Greek philosophers valued ethics and morality.
They emphasized the importance of living a virtuous life and promoting social harmony. Confucianism, for example, places great importance on filial piety, respect for authority, and the cultivation of personal morality. In Greek philosophy, the concept of virtue, especially in the Stoic tradition, was central to living a good life.
However, there are also significant differences between Chinese and Greek philosophy.
For one, Chinese philosophy was more concerned with practical matters, such as social organization, whereas Greek philosophy was more focused on abstract concepts like metaphysics and epistemology. Additionally, Chinese philosophy tended to emphasize the collective good of society, while Greek philosophy was more individualistic.
For similar questions on Chinese and Greek
https://brainly.com/question/18668908
#SPJ11
What were the major arguments in favor of adopting a policy of expansion?
The arguments in favor of expansion are complex and multifaceted, often involving a mix of economic, strategic, and ideological motives.
The policy of expansion refers to a strategy of territorial and economic expansion pursued by many countries throughout history.
The arguments in favor of adopting such a policy have varied depending on the specific context and time period, but some common themes include economic and strategic advantages, national pride and identity, and the spread of cultural and ideological values.
Economically, expansion can bring access to new resources, markets, and trade routes, which can boost a country's wealth and power.
In the 19th century, European powers expanded into Africa and Asia in search of natural resources like rubber, diamonds, and oil.
In the early days of the United States, westward expansion opened up new land for settlement and agriculture, as well as opportunities for trade with Asia via the Pacific coast.
Expansion can also be seen as a way to protect national security and strategic interests. For example, in the Cold War era, the United States expanded its military presence around the world as a way to contain the spread of communism and protect American interests.
In the 21st century, China's "Belt and Road" initiative is seen by some as a way to expand its influence and strategic position in Asia and beyond.
Beyond tangible economic and strategic benefits, expansion can also be driven by national pride and identity.
In the 19th century, European countries saw themselves as superior to the peoples they colonized and felt a duty to "civilize" them.
Similarly, some expansionist policies have been driven by a desire to spread cultural or ideological values.
For example, the Soviet Union expanded its sphere of influence during the Cold War to spread communism, and the United States has at times pursued expansion to promote democracy and capitalism.
However, expansion can also have negative consequences, including exploitation of resources and peoples, conflict with other nations, and the perpetuation of unequal power dynamics.
For similar questions onarguments
https://brainly.com/question/30621862
#SPJ11
true or false: after world war i the league of nations believed iraq, israel, jordan, and palestine were ready for self-rule.
False, After World War I, the League of Nations did not think that Iraq, Israel, Jordan, and Palestine were prepared for independence.
This is because the League of Nations did not recognize these countries as independent nations at the time and instead administered them as mandates under British or French control.
The League of Nations established a system of mandates in the aftermath of World War I to oversee the administration of territories that were formerly under the control of the defeated Central Powers. The mandates were intended to prepare these territories for eventual independence, but they were still subject to the authority of the colonial powers.
After World War I, the League of Nations did not believe that Iraq, Israel, Jordan, and Palestine were ready for self-rule. Instead, they established mandates for these territories, with Britain and France taking on the responsibility to prepare them for eventual self-government.
To Know more about World War
https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
The Freedmen's Bureau had great success in:
Answer:
The greatest successes of the Freedmen's Bureau were in the field of education. More than 1,000 African American schools were built and staffed with qualified instructors. Most of the major African American colleges in the United States were founded with the assistance of the bureau.
in what way were europeans in the sixteenth century similar to mongols in the thirteenth century?
In the sixteenth century, Europeans were similar to Mongols in the thirteenth century in terms of their military expansion and imperialism. Both groups were seeking to expand their territories and gain power through conquest.
The Mongols, under the leadership of Genghis Khan, were known for their brutal tactics and their ability to conquer vast territories. Similarly, Europeans were engaging in military conquests and colonization during the sixteenth century, with Spain and Portugal leading the charge.
Both the Mongols and the Europeans were also heavily influenced by their respective religions and saw themselves as superior to the peoples they conquered.
The Mongols were influenced by shamanism, while Europeans were influenced by Christianity. This sense of superiority led to the belief that it was their duty to spread their religion and way of life to those they conquered.
Overall, the military conquests and imperialism of both the Mongols in the thirteenth century and the Europeans in the sixteenth century demonstrate the human desire for power and dominance.
To know more about imperialism refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30210572#
#SPJ11
who is responsible for coping with incomplete artifact transparency?
The Scrum Master is responsible for coping with incomplete artifact transparency.
The Scrum Master is a leadership position in Scrum methodology. The Scrum Master is responsible for ensuring that the team adheres to Scrum practices and values, as well as for assisting the team in achieving its goals. The Scrum Master is frequently referred to as a "servant-leader" because they serve the team by promoting collaboration and removing obstacles to progress.
The Scrum Master, as a coach and facilitator, is responsible for creating a culture of continuous improvement by helping the team to inspect and adapt. To maximize transparency, the Scrum Master is accountable for removing any roadblocks that might impede the team's work. Scrum Master is also responsible for ensuring that the Scrum team complies with Scrum procedures and values, which include transparency, inspection, and adaptation. Therefore, the Scrum Master is responsible for coping with incomplete artifact transparency.
To learn more about artifact transparency refer :
https://brainly.com/question/29062642
#SPJ11
What contribution did the Stamp Act episode make to the colonists' concept of liberty?
The Stamp Act episode contributed significantly to the colonists' concept of liberty by cementing their belief in the principle of "no taxation without representation."
The Stamp Act, passed by the British Parliament in 1765, required colonists to purchase special paper for printing legal documents, newspapers, and other materials. This tax was particularly offensive to the colonists because it was imposed without their consent and violated their belief in the sanctity of property rights. The colonists saw the tax as a violation of their basic rights as Englishmen, and they responded with widespread protests and boycotts of British goods. The Stamp Act crisis also played a crucial role in galvanizing the colonists' sense of identity and solidarity. By uniting in opposition to the tax, colonists from different regions and backgrounds came together to assert their rights and demand greater autonomy from Britain. The protests and boycotts organized in response to the Stamp Act helped to create a shared sense of grievance and purpose among the colonists, laying the groundwork for future political action and resistance against British authority. The Stamp Act episode therefore played a significant role in shaping the colonists' ideas about liberty and their relationship to Britain, ultimately contributing to the outbreak of the American Revolution.
Learn more about The Stamp Act here: brainly.com/question/14325966
#SPJ11
Charlotte Perkins Gilman would have disagreed with the Muller v.
Oregon (1908) decision because? A) she was an advocate of the eight-hour workday. B) it made it easier for women to work outside the home. C) it promoted inequality between men and women in the workplace. D) it targeted working-class rather than professional women.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman would have disagreed with the Muller v. Oregon (1908) decision because it promoted inequality between men and women in the workplace. Gilman was a prominent feminist and social reformer who advocated for gender equality and women's rights.
The decision in Muller v. Oregon, which upheld the constitutionality of limiting women's working hours, was based on the belief that women needed special protection due to their perceived physical and reproductive vulnerabilities. However, Gilman believed in the inherent capabilities and equal worth of women and opposed any form of discrimination or differential treatment based on gender. Charlotte Perkins Gilman, as a strong advocate for women's rights, would have disagreed with the Muller v. Oregon decision because it promoted inequality between men and women in the workplace. The case involved the constitutionality of an Oregon law that limited women's working hours in certain industries. The decision upheld the law based on the idea that women needed protection due to their physical and reproductive differences from men. However, Gilman believed that women were not inherently weak or inferior to men and that they should have equal opportunities in all aspects of life, including the workplace. Gilman argued for the autonomy and agency of women, advocating for their economic independence and the elimination of gender-based barriers. She believed that women should be treated as capable individuals, not as fragile beings in need of special protection. By endorsing the gender-based limitation on working hours, the Muller v. Oregon decision reinforced the idea that women were inherently different and less capable than men. This contradicted Gilman's core beliefs and her fight for gender equality. For Gilman, true equality meant that women should have the same rights and opportunities as men, including the freedom to work and pursue careers outside the home. She emphasized the need for social and economic reforms that would enable women to participate fully in society and break free from traditional gender roles. Therefore, the Muller v. Oregon decision, which perpetuated gender-based distinctions and limitations in the workplace, would have been seen by Gilman as a setback in the fight for gender equality and women's rights.
Learn more about gender equality here: brainly.com/question/18115501
#SPJ11
What is a favorite bread in Germany and Switzerland that is sometimes sliced to make sandwiches?
a. Spatzle
b. Cornmeal bread
c. Soft pretzels
d. Wheat bread
The answer to this question is c. Soft pretzels
Soft pretzels are a popular bread in Germany and Switzerland, often sold at street vendors and bakeries.
They are typically made from a simple yeast dough that is boiled in water with baking soda before being baked to give the characteristic brown crust. Soft pretzels are usually served warm and salted, but other variations with different toppings and fillings exist. They can also be sliced and used to make sandwiches, especially in Germany where they are known as "bretzels".
Soft pretzels have a long history in Europe, with some sources tracing their origins to the early Middle Ages. They were traditionally eaten during Lent, when the consumption of meat was forbidden. Today, they are enjoyed year-round and are considered a staple food in some regions. Soft pretzels are also popular in the United States, where they are commonly sold at sports events and other venues.
Learn more about soft pretzels here:-brainly.com/question/11814541
#SPJ11
militant liberty"" was the code name for a national security agency that:
Militant liberty"" was the code name for a national security agency that: The code name "militant liberty" was actually used by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to describe a covert program aimed at influencing Hollywood productions and promoting anti-communist themes.
The program, which was active in the 1950s and 1960s, involved the CIA providing financial support and other resources to Hollywood studios and producers in order to create films that portrayed communism in a negative light. The program was intended to counteract the perceived threat of communism during the Cold War era and to promote American ideals and values. While the CIA's involvement in Hollywood has been the subject of much controversy and speculation, it is generally believed that the program had a significant impact on the types of films produced during this period and on the public's perceptions of communism.
Learn more about Central Intelligence Agency
https://brainly.com/question/29553019
#SPJ4
