Answer:
Some laws were quite brutal, others rather progressive. Members of the upper-class often received harsher punishments than commoners, and women had quite a few important rights. Most of the nearly 300 laws written on the pillar pertain to property rights of landowners, slavemasters, merchants, and builders.
Explanation :I guess you'll have to see
Which three structual issues did the second wave of the womens movement work to adress
Answer:
The second wave of the women's movement, which began in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, addressed a range of structural issues related to gender inequality and discrimination. Some of the key issues that the movement worked to address include:
1. Reproductive rights: The movement advocated for a woman's right to control her own body and make decisions about her reproductive health, including access to birth control and safe, legal abortion.
2. Workplace discrimination: The movement sought to address the systemic discrimination that women faced in the workplace, including unequal pay, limited job opportunities, and sexual harassment.
3. Patriarchy and gender roles: The movement challenged traditional gender roles and the patriarchal system that reinforced them, advocating for women's liberation and the dismantling of oppressive social structures that limited women's autonomy and opportunities.
These issues were addressed through a range of tactics and strategies, including protests, demonstrations, legal challenges, and the development of feminist theory and discourse. The second wave of the women's movement had a significant impact on gender relations and social structures in the United States and around the world, paving the way for further progress in the fight for gender equality.
who played protozoa in zenon
Answer: Phillip Rhys
Explanation:
How was the Declaration of Independence organized? What practical purpose did this organization serve? What did each part seek to accomplish?
What are the reasons that William Murray, Earl of Mansfield says that Parliament has the right to tax the colonies? Take a position as to whether his arguments were reasonable and justify your stand
Answer:
Part 1: Organization of the Declaration of Independence
The Declaration of Independence is divided into three main parts: the preamble, the list of grievances, and the conclusion.
1. Preamble: The preamble states the reasons why the Continental Congress felt it was necessary to declare independence from Great Britain. It starts with the famous phrase "When in the course of human events" and goes on to explain that it is necessary for the colonies to dissolve their political ties with Great Britain.
2. List of Grievances: The list of grievances outlines the specific complaints that the colonists had against the British government. It includes a long list of abuses and violations of their rights, such as taxation without representation, the quartering of troops in private homes, and the denial of trial by jury.
3. Conclusion: The conclusion asserts the colonies' right to be free and independent states and declares that they are "absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown." It also announces the formation of a new nation, the United States of America.
Part 2: Practical Purpose of the Organization
The organization of the Declaration of Independence served a practical purpose by laying out a clear and concise argument for why the colonies were justified in declaring independence from Great Britain. By starting with the preamble, the document establishes the philosophical basis for independence, while the list of grievances provides specific evidence to support the colonists' claims. The conclusion then wraps up the argument by asserting the colonies' right to self-determination and announcing the formation of a new nation.
Part 3: William Murray, Earl of Mansfield and the Right to Tax the Colonies
William Murray, Earl of Mansfield, was a British jurist who argued that Parliament had the right to tax the American colonies. Mansfield believed that Parliament had the power to tax the colonies because they were represented in Parliament through their British representatives. He argued that the colonists were "virtually" represented in Parliament, even though they did not have direct representation.
While Mansfield's argument may have been legally sound, it did not take into account the colonists' perspective on the issue of taxation without representation. The colonists believed that they should not be taxed by a government in which they had no direct representation, and they felt that they were being denied their basic rights as English citizens.
In my opinion, Mansfield's arguments were not reasonable because they ignored the colonists' legitimate grievances and failed to take into account the practical realities of colonial life. While the colonists may have been "virtually" represented in Parliament, they had no real say in the decisions that affected their lives and communities. The colonists' objections to taxation without representation were a key factor in the decision to declare independence and establish a new nation based on the principles of democracy and self-determination.
"The Evil Spirits of the Modern Day Press". Describe what this cartoon is saying about the print industry during the 'Gilded Age'. Include why you think this.
The cartoon criticizes the unethical practices and sensationalism of the print industry during the Gilded Age.
The cartoon "The Evil Spirits of the Modern Day Press" depicts the print industry during the Gilded Age and conveys a critical message about its influence and practices. In the cartoon, various newspaper editors are depicted as menacing figures with horns and sharp teeth, symbolizing their negative impact on society.The cartoon is suggesting that during the Gilded Age, the print industry, particularly the sensationalist press, was characterized by unethical practices and sensationalism. It highlights the role of the press in spreading fear, misinformation, and manipulating public opinion for their own gain. This portrayal reflects the concerns of many during that era who criticized the sensationalist and biased nature of newspapers.Furthermore, the cartoon may be criticizing the power and influence of the press in shaping public opinion and influencing political affairs. It suggests that the print industry, driven by profit motives, often prioritized sensationalism over accuracy and responsible journalism.The choice of the term "evil spirits" implies that the cartoonist believed the press had a corrupting influence on society, exploiting sensational stories and manipulative tactics to attract readership and generate profits.Overall, the cartoon provides social commentary on the print industry during the Gilded Age, highlighting the perceived negative impact of sensationalism, misinformation, and unethical practices employed by certain newspapers.For more questions on cartoon
https://brainly.com/question/31787480
#SPJ8
After Hitler came to power, German people of Jewish ancestry lost their rights overnight. gradually lost their rights. left their homeland immediately. gained the right of citizenship.
During war time in history did clinical work become prominent?
A. During Wendi’s practice
B. World War II
C. World War I
D. During the inception of behavioral psychology
During World War I and World War II, clinical work became prominent. The correct options are B and C.
During times of war, especially World War I and World War II, the demand for clinical work increased significantly. These conflicts resulted in large numbers of soldiers experiencing physical injuries, trauma, and psychological distress. As a result, the need for clinical services, including medical treatment and mental health support, became more prominent.
During World War I, advancements in medicine and psychiatry led to the establishment of specialized medical units and psychiatric hospitals to treat soldiers suffering from physical and psychological wounds. Similarly, during World War II, clinical work expanded further to address the physical and mental health needs of military personnel.
The correct options are B and C.
To know more about World War I, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/32148773
#SPJ4
How would you differentiate between the thoughts of Rabindranath Tagore and Shaukat Usmani?
Answer:(a) At the time when both wrote these passages, India was ruled with an iron hand by the British. There were vast caste and class differences and the people were ignorant and backward. They were impressed by the fact that all persons in Russia were treated equally. In spite of them, not being very prosperous, they were happily going about their work. Asians and Europeans mingled freely in Russia, whereas it was unthinkable in India at that time.
(b) The two writers failed to notice that essentially the people were not free to do as they liked. The Bolsheviks ruled like dictators and followed repressive policies to develop the nation quickly. The hard lives and poor working conditions of the people went unnoticed by these writers
Explanation:
what was incredible about Muhammad Ali, and how did he bring people together?
Answer:
Muhammad Ali, the legendary boxer, left an indelible mark on the world due to his remarkable athletic prowess, charismatic personality, and profound impact beyond the boxing ring. What was truly incredible about Ali was his unwavering commitment to his principles and his fearless advocacy for civil rights, social justice, and peace. He used his platform to champion racial equality, religious freedom, and opposition to the Vietnam War. Ali's magnetic personality and eloquence resonated with people from all walks of life, transcending boundaries of race, religion, and nationality. He had a unique ability to connect with individuals across the globe, inspiring them to question societal norms and fight for their beliefs. Ali's unyielding spirit, charisma, and the profound impact of his activism made him a unifying figure who brought diverse communities together under common causes, promoting equality, justice, and the power of standing up for what is right.
Explanation:
Explain the similarities and/or differences between Nelson Mandela and Mohandas Gandhi’s points of view of the use of violence to change a government.
Nelson Mandela advocated for armed resistance when peaceful means failed, while Mohandas Gandhi believed in nonviolent resistance as a means to change a government.
Nelson Mandela and Mohandas Gandhi both played pivotal roles in their respective countries, South Africa and India, in their struggle against oppressive systems of governance. While they both advocated for the liberation and equality of their people, their viewpoints on the use of violence to achieve these goals differed.Gandhi firmly believed in nonviolent resistance as a means to effect social and political change. He preached the philosophy of satyagraha, or "truth-force," emphasizing the power of nonviolent action, civil disobedience, and peaceful protest.In contrast, Mandela initially adopted a peaceful approach, but as the apartheid regime in South Africa became increasingly brutal and oppressive, he believed that armed resistance was necessary. Mandela's involvement with the African National Congress (ANC) and his eventual imprisonment for his role in armed resistance reflect his belief in the use of violence when peaceful means were exhausted.While both leaders were committed to the cause of justice and equality, their perspectives on violence as a tool for change varied. Gandhi espoused nonviolence as a moral principle, while Mandela saw violence as a justifiable response to extreme oppression.
For more questions on Nelson Mandela:
https://brainly.com/question/8996656
#SPJ8
Which statement describes a conflict over ideology
Answer: Two groups fight over different beliefs about how to organize society..
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which arguments is superior
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
Happy to help; have a great day! :)
1) From what life-threatening episode(s) is Moses delivered in the stories about his origins (Exod 1:1-2:25) (Select all that apply)?
a. Herod’s command to have Hebrew boys exterminated
b. Pharaoh’s command to have Hebrew boys exterminated
c. The annual flood of the Nile
d. Pharaoh’s desire to kill him for killing an Egyptian
e. Egyptian military forces
Moses is delivered from the life-threatening episodes of Pharaoh's command to have Hebrew boys exterminated, and Pharaoh's desire to kill him for killing an Egyptian. The correct option is B and D.
In the stories about Moses' origins in Exodus 1:1-2:25, it is mentioned that Pharaoh ordered the killing of Hebrew boys, which posed a significant threat to Moses' life. However, Moses is saved when his mother places him in a basket and sets him adrift on the Nile River, ultimately leading to his rescue by Pharaoh's daughter.
Additionally, Moses later flees Egypt after killing an Egyptian who was mistreating a Hebrew slave. Pharaoh becomes aware of Moses' action and seeks to kill him, prompting Moses to escape to Midian. These two events demonstrate how Moses was delivered from life-threatening episodes, overcoming the dangers posed by Pharaoh's commands and his desire for retribution.
The correct option is B and D.
To know more about Pharaoh, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/18058287
#SPJ4
Chapter 9
Discuss the Zionist terrorist organizations that have existed in Israel. Looking at some of the prominent Middle Eastern terrorist groups discussed in this chapter, what are some of the techniques used by terrorist organizations to increase recognition, support, and power? What external forces discussed in previous chapters multiplied the strength of these terrorist organizations? Do you think it is possible to bring religious extremism to an end?
Chapter 10 How did the Tupamaros affect revolution worldwide? If the Tupamaros were so influential, then why did they ultimately fail in their own quest? What are the major issues surrounding Naxilite terrorism? How does this compare to the issues that gave rise to the Tupamaros? Julie Mazzei argues that the conditions giving rise to death squads develop when several factors come together to form a favorable environment. What are these factors? Do you agree or disagree with her argument?
Terrorist organizations often employ tactics such as propaganda, recruitment, fundraising, and strategic targeting.
Propaganda is used to spread their ideology, recruit sympathizers, and gain media attention. Recruitment involves attracting individuals who share their beliefs or can be coerced into joining through various means, including promises of power or addressing grievances. Fundraising is essential for sustaining operations and acquiring resources, often achieved through illicit means such as smuggling or extortion. Strategic targeting involves selecting high-profile or symbolic targets to maximize impact and generate fear or sympathy.
External forces that can contribute to the strength of terrorist organizations include political instability, regional conflicts, social grievances, economic disparities, and external support. Political instability provides fertile ground for extremist ideologies to thrive, as it creates power vacuums and weak governance. Regional conflicts can fuel radicalization and provide opportunities for terrorist groups to exploit existing grievances. Social and economic disparities can create environments where individuals feel marginalized, leading them to seek solace in extremist ideologies. Additionally, external support from state sponsors or sympathetic groups can provide financial, logistical, and ideological assistance to terrorist organizations, enhancing their capabilities.
Regarding the possibility of bringing religious extremism to an end, it is a complex and multifaceted challenge. Religious extremism stems from a combination of ideological, political, socio-economic, and historical factors, making it difficult to eradicate entirely. Countering religious extremism requires addressing root causes such as poverty, lack of education, political grievances, and promoting social inclusion. It also involves fostering dialogue, promoting tolerance, and challenging extremist narratives through counter-messaging efforts. However, it is important to note that complete eradication may not be achievable, and efforts should focus on mitigating the impact and influence of extremist ideologies while promoting peaceful coexistence.
To know more about Zionist terrorist organizations here
https://brainly.com/question/3898272
#SPJ4
A mosaic like this one was made from
splashes of wall paint.
small, colored tiles.
pieces of marble.
pieces of bronze.
How did the League of Nations affect postwar Europe?
Answer: To understand how the League of Nations affected postwar Europe, consider its role in promoting international cooperation and preventing future conflicts. The League aimed to promote disarmament, resolve disputes peacefully, and improve living conditions for people around the world. Despite its shortcomings, the League set a precedent for international organizations and helped pave the way for future global cooperation.
Explanation:
Answer the following question with a brief, concise, and factual answer.
A. What were some of the reasons that Phillip II of Spain sent the Spanish Armada in
an effort to conqueror England? What were some of the problems the Armada encountered,
and what advantages did the English have? In the end the Armada was defeated: how did victory
affect England, and what did defeat mean for Spain and Phillip II?
In paragraph form and at least 3 paragraphs.
Philip II sent the Spanish Armada to conquer England due to religious, political, and economic reasons; the Armada faced challenges and was defeated, leading to a significant victory for England and weakening Spain's naval dominance.
Philip II of Spain sent the Spanish Armada to conquer England due to reasons such as religious conflict, English support for Dutch rebels, and economic rivalry. The Armada encountered problems including adverse weather conditions and the English naval tactics of smaller, more maneuverable ships.
The English had advantages such as superior naval strategies, coordination, and the use of fireships. The defeat of the Armada was a significant victory for England, boosting national pride and strengthening its naval power. It marked a decline in Spanish naval dominance and weakened Philip II's aspirations for European hegemony, though Spain remained a powerful nation.
Learn more about Spanish Armada at
https://brainly.com/question/4911884
#SPJ4
In the first Spanish colonies, how did nearly all Indigenous peoples die? poison disease sacrifice neglect
Answer:
In the first Spanish colonies, nearly all Indigenous peoples died due to diseases brought by the Europeans, such as smallpox, influenza, and measles. Indigenous peoples had no immunity to these diseases, which had devastating effects on their populations. It is estimated that up to 90% of the Indigenous population in the Americas died from diseases introduced by Europeans in the centuries following their arrival. While there were other factors that contributed to the decline of Indigenous populations, such as warfare, forced labor, and displacement from their lands, disease was by far the most significant factor.
In the Spanish colonies, the majority of Indigenous people died from foreign diseases brought by the colonizers. These diseases, including smallpox, measles, and influenza, spread rapidly among the Indigenous populations, who had no immunity to them, causing a massive loss of life.
Explanation:In the early years of the Spanish colonies, many Indigenous peoples met tragic ends, with a significant portion dying from disease. When the Spanish colonizers came to the New World, they brought with them diseases like smallpox, measles, and influenza. These diseases were completely foreign to the Indigenous populations, who had no immunity to them. The diseases spread rapidly, causing devastating losses in populations that had never encountered such illnesses before. Estimates suggest that up to 90% of the Indigenous population may have died from these diseases. Although other factors such as forced labor and violent conflicts also played a part, disease was the primary cause of this massive loss of life.
Learn more about Death of Indigenous Peoples here:https://brainly.com/question/33147414
#SPJ2
How does individual change, team change, and organizational change play into this case?
What could Daisy have learned through leading change? How could she have achieved better buy-in and institutionalized a faster recruitment process?
What role would a change agent play?
Individual change: Daisy was frustrated in the kind of tactics that were being planned by Elsie. She creates a team of recruiters that are in charge of quickly recruiting the prospects, as opposed to using external agents to handle the entire hiring process. Daisy organised a series of brainstorming meetings with operational managers who needed people, as well as internal and external recruiters at various levels. Daisy's initiatives in this example demonstrate how she has changed herself.
Team change: Daisy divided the hiring procedure into the following phases: identifying prospects, document gathering, initial reviews, interviewing, background and reference checks, offer distribution, and the holding period before the new hire can begin. She chose the ideal time frame for each stage after consulting the team and heavily drawing on the external recruiter's expertise. A project team was formed with an operations manager (Mike), an internal recruiter (Abdel), and an external recruiter (Marissa). They were asked to record the actual timeline for each candidate during the recruitment process, and they all agreed and were eager to try it out. The group got to work on the strategies, which helped to reduce the amount of time needed. Organizational change: The recruitment process took 50 days instead of the 80 days that the team had previously taken after putting the methods that Daisy and her team had set into action. This indicates the company's organisational transformation.
Daisy must have discovered through her experience as a change agent that while some people are absolutely in favour of change and would accept it if it were to occur, others are utterly opposed to it and would never support it. She might have discovered how to deal with opposition to change and what plans need be made for it in order to successfully implement the change. She could have improved buy-in and institutionalised the quicker hiring process by incorporating all of the staff in the change process and giving training to all of the important stakeholders about why the change is necessary.She needs to explain to the stakeholders in the organisation the benefits and drawbacks of the move. As a result, the organization's diverse stakeholders would be more likely to accept the change.
An internal change agent is typically a team member who is knowledgeable about organisation development, behavioural sciences, and human intervention. The fact that internal change agents are aware of the organization's history of change initiatives and social politics is noteworthy in this case. They will work assiduously to build strong connections to strengthen attitudes and cultural views towards change - even after the implementation process is complete. To assist their project, organisations must choose external change agents if they don't have an inside employee with the necessary expertise. Although external change agents offer a different viewpoint, their presence can endanger the current workforce, and their hiring can add a significant cost to long change initiatives.
Learn more about individual, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14060482
#SPJ4
Which line from the short story best reflects the conflict?
The line from the short story that best reflects conflict is "I haven't done anything about it; I can't think of anything to do"
What is Conflict in Short story
Conflict in Short story is the term used to describe the main issue or struggle that drives the story and increases tension for the characters. It is the key component that drives the narrative ahead and maintains reader interest. Various factors, such as outside pressures or internal conflicts within a character, can give rise to conflict.
Effective short stories frequently use multiple levels of conflict to provide complexity and depth. The resolution of these conflicts—whether by victory or defeat—leads the narrative to its conclusion and might result in character development or change.
Learn more about short story here
https://brainly.com/question/24062520
#SPJ1
NB: Full Question
Which line from the short story best reflects the conflict? As yet, I haven't done anything about it; I can't think of anything to do. Obviously, they were simple beings, uni-cellular, some sort of primitive single-celled things. She is described as blushing and knitting her brows angrily. The passage indicated not; they seemed to move through the air, not over the surface.
Look at the place of monasticism in European society after 750 CE. Write about the important role of the Benedictines and the subsequent monastic reform groups like the Cistercians, Carthusians, Waldensians, Premonstratensians, etc.
Monasticism, led by the Benedictines and subsequent reform groups, played a vital role in European society after 750 CE, influencing education, agriculture, spirituality, and cultural development.
After 750 CE, monasticism remained a vital aspect of European society, with the Benedictines playing a central role. They established monasteries that served as centers of learning, agriculture, and spirituality. In the 11th and 12th centuries, monastic reform movements emerged, including the Cistercians, Carthusians, Waldensians, and Premonstratensians. The Cistercians emphasized simplicity, manual labor, and self-sufficiency.
The Carthusians focused on solitary contemplation, while the Waldensians advocated for poverty and evangelism. The Premonstratensians combined monastic discipline with active apostolic work. These reform groups revitalized monasticism, contributing to religious and social reforms and shaping European society through education, agriculture, healthcare, and cultural endeavors.
Learn more about European society after 750 CE at
https://brainly.com/question/14144017
#SPJ4
A. Which of the following demonstrated the weakness of the
Articles of Confederation, leading to the Constitutional
Convention?
Group of answer choices
1. Shays's Rebellion
2. Boston Massacre
3. Battl
Answer:
The correct answer is 1. Shays's Rebellion demonstrated the weakness of the Articles of Confederation, leading to the Constitutional Convention. Shays's Rebellion was an armed uprising in western Massachusetts from 1786 to 1787, led by Daniel Shays, a former captain in the Continental Army. The rebellion was fueled by economic grievances and a lack of government intervention to address them. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government lacked the power to raise an army or regulate commerce, making it difficult to address the rebellion. This highlighted the need for a stronger federal government, leading to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 and the drafting of the United States Constitution.
how would a map of the year 1400 be different ?
In the year 1400, a map was different from modern map due to factors like limited geographic knowledge, different cartographic techniques etc.
How would a map of the year 1400 differ from a modern map?During the 15th century, the knowledge of the world was considerably less comprehensive compared to today. Explorations and discoveries were ongoing and vast regions of the globe remained unexplored or inaccurately depicted.
Consequently, a map from 1400 would likely display incomplete or distorted information about the geography including missing continents, incorrect landmass shapes, and limited understanding of distant lands.
Read more about 1400s map
brainly.com/question/904803
#SPJ1
How invent English language
Answer:Old English (450-1100 AD): The earliest form of English, also known as Anglo-Saxon, was brought to Britain by Germanic tribes, particularly the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. Old English was heavily influenced by the languages spoken by these tribes and underwent significant changes during this period.
Middle English (1100-1500 AD): Middle English emerged after the Norman Conquest of 1066, when the Normans brought their own French dialect to England. This resulted in a fusion of Old English and Norman French influences. Middle English saw the development of a distinct vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation.
Early Modern English (1500-1700 AD): The period of Early Modern English was characterized by several significant developments, including the Great Vowel Shift, which altered the pronunciation of many words. The printing press, introduced in the late 15th century, played a crucial role in standardizing English spelling and facilitating the spread of written texts.
Modern English (1700-Present): Modern English began to take shape in the 18th century and has continued to evolve to the present day. During the colonial era, English spread to various parts of the world, leading to the development of different dialects and variations. The Industrial Revolution and technological advancements in the 19th and 20th centuries introduced new vocabulary and expressions to English.
It's important to note that the development of the English language was a collective effort involving countless individuals over many generations. It was shaped by various cultural, historical, and social factors, including invasions, trade, literature, and global interactions.
In summary, English evolved naturally over time through a complex process of linguistic influences and historical events, rather than being invented by a single individual.
Explanation:
If consumers expect the price of a good to increase in the near future then immediate demand for that good will be __________.
A.
stopped
B.
increased
C.
decreased
D.
unchanged
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
B. increased
If consumers expect the price of a good to increase in the near future then immediate demand for that good will be increased.
How did James Madison influence the United States’ relationship with France? As secretary of state, he oversaw the Louisiana Purchase from France. As secretary of state, he encouraged the US to fight in the Napoleonic War. As president, he fought against the French navy for seizing American ships. As president, he pushed for declaring war against the French in June 1812.
Answer:
As president, James Madison fought against the French navy for seizing American ships.
During Madison's presidency in the early 19th century, France was engaged in a series of wars with other European powers, including Great Britain. As part of this conflict, French privateers began seizing American ships in an effort to disrupt British trade. Madison, along with many other Americans, believed that these actions violated American neutrality and sovereignty, and he took a firm stance against them.
In 1809, Madison authorized the use of force against any French vessels that attempted to interfere with American trade, and he also sent a diplomatic envoy to France to negotiate a resolution to the dispute. While the negotiations were ultimately successful, tensions between the U.S. and France remained high for several years.
It is worth noting that as secretary of state, Madison did not oversee the Louisiana Purchase from France - that was President Thomas Jefferson's decision. Madison did play a role in negotiating the Treaty of Ghent, which ended the War of 1812 between the U.S. and Great Britain, but he did not encourage the U.S. to fight in the Napoleonic War. And while Madison did push for declaring war against the British in June 1812, he did not call for a war against the French.
what is one important factor that contributed to the ability of europeans to conquer the aztec and inca peoples during the european colonization of the americas?
Answer:
One important factor that contributed to Europeans being able to conquer the Aztec and Inca peoples was their possession of far superior weapons and military technology.
The Aztecs and Incas, while advanced civilizations in their own right, were still fighting with weapons like clubs, spears and archaic armor when the Spanish conquistadors arrived. The Europeans, on the other hand, had guns, cannons and steel swords - weapons and armor made from superior materials.
When the Spanish conquistadors, along with their horses, guns and cannons first confronted the Aztecs and Incas, the native populations had never seen anything like it. The advanced European weaponry and military equipment gave the conquistadors a huge tactical advantage that the Aztecs and Incas could not match.
The Aztecs and Incas were also unfamiliar with and undisciplined against the tactics of cavalry and artillery that the Spanish employed. This, combined with the psychological impact of seemingly magical weapons like guns that could kill at a distance, contributed to the Spanish being able to conquer the Aztec and Inca civilizations relatively quickly despite being vastly outnumbered.
So in summary, the technological and military gap between the relatively primitive weapons of the Aztecs and Incas and the far advanced weaponry of the European conquistadors was an important factor that helped enable the Spanish conquest by giving them a decisive edge on the battlefield.
In the sixteenth century, the population of enslaved Africans in North American grew rapidly due to the labor demand for what economic activity?
Question 2 options:
manufacturing factory goods to sell in England
building roads to increase trade between the English colonies
growing cash crops in the Southern and Mid-Atlantic colonies
expanding New England's shipbuilding industry
A central claim of the main text is that the Soviet Union’s space program had several failures, just like the US space program. How does this excerpt support the main text? It provides supplemental information on how the US was able to beat the Soviet Union. It provides supplemental information about the reactions of the Soviet Union’s first trip to space. It provides supplemental information on the details of how the Soviet Union failed to launch a satellite. It provides supplemental information about why the US space program was not ready for space travel.
This excerpt supports the main text by providing supplemental information on the details of how the Soviet Union failed to launch a satellite, highlighting the failures of their space program.
For more such question on Soviet Union
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ8
Answer:
B. It provides supplemental information about the reactions of the Soviet Union’s first trip to space.
Explanation:
Edge 2023
Compare what you have read about Sappho's poetry to a song you like today. How has the "lyric" changed since Sappho's time?
For some reason, it wouldn't let me click the "ADD YOUR ANSWER" button, and said that there was some sort of inappropriate content in my answer.
Should Alexander be considered great? Wright a paragraph of atleast 5 sentences of why
Alexander the Great, the renowned Macedonian king, deserves to be considered great due to his remarkable military accomplishments, visionary leadership, cultural impact, and lasting legacy.
First and foremost, his military prowess is unparalleled in history. He successfully conquered vast territories, including Persia, Egypt, and India, creating one of the largest empires the world had ever seen. His innovative strategies and tactical brilliance enabled him to overcome formidable adversaries and achieve remarkable victories.Moreover, Alexander's leadership qualities were exceptional. He inspired loyalty and admiration among his troops, leading them through challenging campaigns with unwavering determination. His ability to unite diverse cultures and incorporate them into his empire showcased his diplomatic skills and vision for a multicultural society.Alexander's influence extended beyond military conquests. He fostered the spread of Hellenistic culture, blending Greek traditions with local customs in the lands he conquered. This cultural exchange had a profound impact on art, architecture, literature, and philosophy, laying the foundation for the flourishing of Greek civilization in the centuries that followed.Lastly, Alexander's legacy endured long after his death. His empire's fragmentation into several successor states led to the spread of Greek language, culture, and ideas throughout the ancient world. His military strategies continued to inspire future conquerors, and his name became synonymous with greatness and ambition.In conclusion, Alexander the Great's military achievements, visionary leadership, cultural influence, and lasting legacy justify his consideration as one of history's greatest figures.For more questions on Alexander the Great
https://brainly.com/question/289365
#SPJ8
