The Laplace transform is calculated step by step by using the definition of Laplace transform.
Given the function `f(t) = 2 * (t^3) * e^(st)`.
To find the Laplace transform, we use the definition of Laplace transform, which is defined as follows:
`F(s) = L{f(t)} = ∫_[0]^[∞] e^(-st) * f(t) * dt`Substitute `f(t)` in the above equation. `F(s) = L{2 * (t^3) * e^(st)} = ∫_[0]^[∞] e^(-st) * 2 * (t^3) * e^(st) * dt`
Here, we can simplify as `e^(-st)` and `e^(st)` get cancelled.`F(s) = 2 * ∫_[0]^[∞] t^3 * dt = 2 * [t^4/4]_[0]^[∞] = 2 * (0 - 0^4/4) = 0`
Therefore, the Laplace transform of `f(t) = 2 * (t^3) * e^(st)` is `F(s) = 0`.
Hence, the Laplace transform is calculated step by step by using the definition of Laplace transform.
To know more about Laplace visit:
brainly.com/question/31867856
#SPJ11
Use proof by contradiction to prove the statement below: If s t Z , Î and s ³ 2 , then s | t or s | (t +1) . Note: (i) 2 | 4 denotes 2 divides 4 and 2| 3 denotes 2 does not divide 3. (ii) Definition of divisibility, a b| if an only if ac b = where a b, ÎZ and c + ÎZ . (iii) By De Morgan’s Law, the negation of " s | t or s | (t +1) " is " st| and s t | 1 ( + ) ".
(c) Use proof by contrapositive to prove the statement below: Let xÎZ . If 2 x x − + 6 5 is even, then x is odd.
If s does not divide t, then by definition, t = sq + r, where 0 < r < s. Similarly, if s does not divide t + 1, then t + 1 = sp + q, where 0 < q < s, substituting for t in the second equation, we get sp + q = sq + r + 1, which can be rewritten as s(p − q) = r + 1.
In mathematics, proof by contradiction is a method of proving a statement by showing that it is true if we assume that its opposite is false. This can also be called an indirect proof. In a proof by contradiction, we assume the opposite of the statement we are trying to prove, then show that it leads to a contradiction or absurdity. This allows us to conclude that the original statement must be true.
Let s, t, and Î be integers such that s ≥ 2. We want to prove that if s does not divide t and s does not divide t + 1, then s < 2. This is the contrapositive of our statement, which is "if s, t, Î are integers such that s ≥ 2 and s divides neither t nor t + 1, then s ≤ 2."We assume that s does not divide t and s does not divide t + 1, and then we show that this leads to a contradiction.
If s does not divide t, then by definition, t = sq + r, where 0 < r < s. Similarly, if s does not divide t + 1, then t + 1 = sp + q, where 0 < q < s, substituting for t in the second equation, we get sp + q = sq + r + 1, which can be rewritten as s(p − q) = r + 1.
Since 0 < r < s, we have 0 < r + 1 < s + 1, so r + 1 is a positive integer less than s. Since s is the smallest positive integer that divides both r and r + 1, we have a contradiction. Therefore, our assumption that s does not divide t and s does not divide t + 1 must be false, which means that s divides either t or t + 1.
Therefore, we have proved that if s, t, Î are integers such that s ≥ 2 and s divides neither t nor t + 1, then s ≤ 2. We have done this by assuming the contrapositive of the statement and showing that it leads to a contradiction.
To know more about the contrapositive, visit:
brainly.com/question/12151500
#SPJ11
Prove Ω(g(n)), when f(n)=2n4+5n2−3 such that f(n) is θ(g(n)). You do not need to prove/show the Ω(g(n)) portion of θ, just Ω(g(n)). Show all your steps and clearly define all your values.
To prove that f(n) = 2n^4 + 5n^2 - 3 is Ω(g(n)), we need to find a function g(n) and positive constants c and n₀ such that f(n) ≥ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀.
Let's choose g(n) = n^4. We will now find positive constants c and n₀ such that f(n) ≥ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀.
Step 1: Define g(n) = n^4.
Step 2: Choose a positive constant c. Let's say c = 1.
Step 3: We need to find a value for n₀ such that f(n) ≥ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀.
f(n) = 2n^4 + 5n^2 - 3
g(n) = n^4
Now, let's find the value of n₀. We want to prove that for all n ≥ n₀, f(n) ≥ c * g(n).
f(n) ≥ c * g(n)
2n^4 + 5n^2 - 3 ≥ n^4 (since c = 1)
Simplifying the equation:
2n^4 + 5n^2 - 3 - n^4 ≥ 0
n^4 + 5n^2 - 3 ≥ 0
To find the value of n₀, we solve the equation n^4 + 5n^2 - 3 = 0.
However, this equation does not have an analytical solution. We can determine the behavior of the function f(n) by looking at its dominant term, which is 2n^4. As n increases, the value of 2n^4 dominates over the other terms (5n^2 and -3).
Therefore, we can say that for large enough values of n, f(n) ≥ c * g(n) holds true.
In conclusion, we have shown that f(n) = 2n^4 + 5n^2 - 3 is Ω(g(n)) with g(n) = n^4, which means that f(n) grows at least as fast as n^4.
To know more about function refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30721594#
#SPJ11
Consider the following formula for the optimum time between preventive maintenance actions: T = m(theta) + delta What does the term 0 represent? a. The location parameter of the Weibull distribution b. A function of failure cost c. A value for the Weibull shape parameter d. The scale parameter of the Weibull distribution
In the formula T = m(theta) + delta, the term "0" does not have a clear interpretation or representation based on the given information.
It is possible that "0" is used as a placeholder or a generic symbol to represent a parameter or variable that is not explicitly defined in the formula.
Without additional context or information about the specific equation and its application, it is difficult to determine the exact meaning of "0".
However, based on the options provided, it is clear that "0" does not correspond to the location parameter, shape parameter, or scale parameter of the Weibull distribution.
These parameters typically have distinct symbols and meanings in the context of the Weibull distribution.
Therefore, without further clarification or context, it is not possible to determine the specific representation or interpretation of the term "0" in the given formula.
To know more about interpretation refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28235829#
#SPJ11
Find the linearization L(x,y) of the function f(x,y) at P 0
. Then find an upper bound for the magnitude ∣E∣ of the error in the approximation f(x,y)≈L(x,y) over the rectangle R. f(x,y)=e y
cosx at P 0
(0,0)
R:∣x∣≤0.1,∣y∣≤0.1
(Use e y
≤1.11 and ∣cosx∣≤1 in estimating E.)
The linearization L(x, y) of the function f(x, y) at P0 is 1 + xy. And the upper bound for the magnitude of the error in the approximation f(x, y) ≈ L(x, y) over the rectangle R is |E| ≤ 2.12.
Here are the steps to find the linearization of the function and an upper bound for the magnitude of the error in the approximation f(x, y) ≈ L(x, y) over the rectangle R:
We are given the function f(x, y) = ey cosx at P0(0, 0), and the rectangle R: |x| ≤ 0.1, |y| ≤ 0.1.
Step 1: Find the first-order partial derivatives of f(x, y):
fx(x, y) = -ey sinx
fy(x, y) = ey cosx
At P0, we have fx(0, 0) = 0 and fy(0, 0) = 1.
Step 2: Find the linearization L(x, y) of f(x, y) at P0:
L(x, y) = f(0, 0) + fx(0, 0)(x - 0) + fy(0, 0)(y - 0)
= f(0, 0) + xfy(0, 0)
= 1 + xy
Therefore, the linearization of f(x, y) at P0 is L(x, y) = 1 + xy.
Step 3: Find an upper bound for the magnitude of the error E(x, y) = f(x, y) - L(x, y) in the approximation f(x, y) ≈ L(x, y) over the rectangle R:
|E(x, y)| = |f(x, y) - L(x, y)|
= |ey cosx - (1 + xy)|
= |ey cosx - 1 - xy|
Using the triangle inequality, we have:
|E(x, y)| ≤ |ey cosx - 1| + |xy|
Now, using the given estimates e^y ≤ 1.11 and |cosx| ≤ 1, we can find an upper bound for each term:
|ey cosx - 1| ≤ e^y + 1 = 2.11
|xy| ≤ 0.1² = 0.01
Therefore, an upper bound for the magnitude of the error is:
|E| ≤ 2.12
Hence, the linearization L(x, y) of the function f(x, y) at P0 is 1 + xy. And the upper bound for the magnitude of the error in the approximation f(x, y) ≈ L(x, y) over the rectangle R is |E| ≤ 2.12.
Learn more about function
brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
Determine Whether The Series Is Convergent Or Divergent By Expressing The Nth Partial Sum Sn As A Telescoping Sum. If It Is Convergent, Find Its Sun DIVERGES.) ∑N=3[infinity]N2−12
To determine whether the given series is convergent or divergent by expressing the nth partial sum `Sn` as a telescoping sum and find its sum if it is convergent, we have;$$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty} (n^2 - 1^2) $$Factor the expression $(n^2 - 1^2)$ as a difference of squares, then it follows that;$$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty} (n^2 - 1^2) = \sum_{n=3}^{\infty} (n - 1)(n+1) $$
Now we can express the sum in the telescoping form as follows:$$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty} (n - 1)(n+1) = \sum_{n=3}^{\infty} n^2 - \sum_{n=3}^{\infty} 1^2 = \sum_{n=3}^{\infty} n^2 - (n-2) $$We can simplify the above equation as follows:$$= [3^2 + 4^2 + ...+ n^2] - (1+1+1) + (2+2)$$$$ = [3^2 + 4^2 + ...+ n^2] - n + 3$$Notice that the given series $$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty} (n^2 - 1^2) $$is equivalent to the telescoping series;$$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty} [n - 1)(n+1)] = [3^2 + 4^2 + ...+ n^2] - n + 3$$
Since the series is divergent (because the sum to infinity of the first term diverges), there is no sum. Thus the answer is: $$\boxed{Divergent}$$.
Learn more about Convergent and Divergent at https://brainly.com/question/32650612
#SPJ11
\( \boldsymbol{F}(x, y, z)=\frac{x}{y^{2}} \boldsymbol{i}+\frac{y^{2}}{z} \boldsymbol{j}+\frac{x^{2}}{z^{2}} \boldsymbol{k} \)
The curl of F(x, y, z) = x/y²i + y²/zj + x²/z²k is Curl(F) = (2y/z - 2z/y²)i + (2x/z² - 2x/y)j + (2yz - 2xy²)/y³k.
To find the curl of a vector field F(x, y, z) = P(x, y, z)i + Q(x, y, z)j + R(x, y, z)k, we can use the curl operator. The curl of F is given by the determinant,
Curl(F) = (d/dx, d/dy, d/dz) x (P, Q, R)
Expanding this determinant using the cross product formula, we obtain,
Curl(F) = (dR/dy - dQ/dz)i + (dP/dz - dR/dx)j + (dQ/dx - dP/dy)k
In our case, F(x, y, z) = x/y²i + y²/zj + x²/z²k, so we have,
P(x, y, z) = x/y²
Q(x, y, z) = y²/z
R(x, y, z) = x²/z²
Now, we differentiate each component with respect to x, y, and z, respectively,
dP/dx = 0
dP/dy = -2x/y³
dP/dz = 0
dQ/dx = 0
dQ/dy = 0
dQ/dz = -2y/z²
dR/dx = 2x/z²
dR/dy = 0
dR/dz = -2x²/z³
Substituting these values into the curl formula, we have,
Curl(F) = (0 - (-2y/z²))i + (0 - 0)j + (2x²/z³ - 0)k
Simplifying further,
Curl(F) = (2y/z²)i + 0j + (2x²/z³)k
This can be written as,
Curl(F) = (2y/z - 2z/y²)i + (2x/z² - 2x/y)j + (2yz - 2xy²)/y³k
Therefore, the curl of F(x, y, z) = x/y²i + y²/zj + x²/z²k is given by Curl(F) = (2y/z - 2z/y²)i + (2x/z² - 2x/y)j + (2yz - 2xy²)/y³k.
To know more about Curl, visit,
https://brainly.com/question/30581467
#SPJ4
Complete question - F(x, y, z) = x/y²i + y²/zj + x²/z²k, find Curl of F.
For the piecewise linear function, find (a) f(-4), (b) f(-2), (c) f(0), (d) f(2), and (e) f(5). if xs-2 if x>-2 f(x) = 2x x-2
Given the function: f(x) = { xs-2 if x>-2 2x if x<=-2 } We are asked to find the values of (a) f(-4), (b) f(-2), (c) f(0), (d) f(2), and (e) f(5).Using the function provided, let's evaluate f(-4). Since -4 is less than or equal to -2, we use the second part of the function to find f(-4).
f(x) = 2xf(-4) = 2(-4)f(-4) = -8Next, we will evaluate f(-2). Since -2 is greater than -2, we use the first part of the function to find f(-2).f(x) = xs-2f(-2) = -2s-2f(-2) = -2(-2) - 2f(-2) = 2Lastly, we will evaluate f(0). Since 0 is greater than -2, we use the first part of the function to find f(0).f(x) = xs-2f(0) = 0s-2f(0) = 0 - 2f(0) = -2Next, we will evaluate f(2). Since 2 is greater than -2, we use the first part of the function to find f(2).f(x) = xs-2f(2) = 2s-2f(2) = 2 - 2f(2) = 0Lastly, we will evaluate f(5). Since 5 is greater than -2, we use the first part of the function to find f(5).f(x) = xs-2f(5) = 5s-2f(5) = 5 - 2f(5) = 3.
Therefore, the values of (a) f(-4) is -8, (b) f(-2) is 2, (c) f(0) is -2, (d) f(2) is 0, and (e) f(5) is 3.
To know more about function visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
Rods are taken from a bin in which the mean diameter is 8.30 mm and the standard deviation is 0.40 mm. Bearings are taken from another bin in which the mean diameter is 9.70 mm and the standard deviation is 0.35 mm. A rod and a bearing are both chosen at random. Assume that both diameters are normally distributed. (i) Find the probability that the rod will fit inside the bearing with at least 0.10 mm clearance? (ii) Find the percentage of randomly selected rods and bearings will not fit together? (iii) If it is possible to adjust the mean bearing diameter, determine the maximum bearing diameter value should be adjusted so that the clearance will be between 0.05 and 0.09 mm ?
To determine the percentage of randomly selected rods and bearings that will not fit together, we must find the probability that the diameter of the rod is greater than the diameter of the bearing by more than 0.10 mm or less than 0.10 mm.
To determine the percentage of randomly selected rods find the probability that the diameter of the rod is greater than the diameter of the bearing plus 0.10 mm or less than the diameter of the bearing minus 0.10 mm. For the rod, this is:
P(X > 9.70 + 0.10) + P(X < 9.70 - 0.10) = P(X > 9.80) + P(X < 9.60)
= P(Z > 1.6) + P(Z < -1.6)
= 0.0548 + 0.0548
= 0.1096 or 10.96% approximately.
For the bearing, this is:
P(Y > 8.30 + 0.10) + P(Y < 8.30 - 0.10) = P(Y > 8.40) + P(Y < 8.20)
= P(Z > 2.4) + P(Z < -2.4)
= 0.0082 + 0.0082
= 0.0164 or 1.64% approximately.
So the percentage of randomly selected rods and bearings that will not fit together is the product of these two probabilities, which is 0.0018 or 0.18% approximately.
If we adjust the mean bearing diameter by x mm, then the probability that the clearance will be between 0.05 and 0.09 mm is:P(9.70 + x - 8.30 - X ≤ 0.09) - P(9.70 + x - 8.30 - X ≤ 0.05) = P(X - 1.4 + x ≤ 0.09) - P(X - 1.4 + x ≤ 0.05) = P(X ≤ 1.31 - x) - P(X ≤ 1.35 - x)Using standard normal tables, we can find that P(Z ≤ 1.31) = 0.9049 and P(Z ≤ 1.35) = 0.9115. Therefore, the probability that the clearance will be between 0.05 and 0.09 mm is:0.9115 - 0.9049 = 0.0066.If we want this probability to be as large as possible, we should choose x so that P(X ≤ 1.31 - x) and P(X ≤ 1.35 - x) are as close as possible to each other. This occurs when 1.31 - x = 1.35 - x, which gives x = 0.02 mm. Therefore, the maximum bearing diameter value should be adjusted by 0.02 mm.
To know more about diameter visit:
brainly.com/question/14798504
#SPJ11
Problem 4. (15=10+5 points) Let -10:00) be a set of vectors in R4, where x and y are unknown real numbers. (1) Find the value of x and y such that S is an orthogonal set. (2) With the choice of x and
Any two vectors in S must have a zero dot product in order for S to be an orthogonal set. We arrive to the equations' solutions, x = -3 and y = -2. Since the vectors in S are linearly independent at these values, Span(S) has a dimension of 3 at these values.
(1) For S to be an orthogonal set, the dot product of any two vectors in S must be equal to zero. Therefore, we have the following equations:
(1, 2, 3, x) ⋅ (2, 3, x, y) = 0
(1, 2, 3, x) ⋅ (3, 2, y, x) = 0
Solving these equations, we find that x = -3 and y = -2.
(2) With x = -3 and y = -2, the dimension of Span(S) is 3. This is because the vectors in S are linearly independent, and any set of linearly independent vectors in Rn has a dimension of n.
To show that the vectors in S are linearly independent, we can use the following argument:
Suppose that the vectors in S are linearly dependent. Then there exist constants, not all equal to zero, such that
a₁(1, 2, 3, -3) + a₂(2, 3, x, -2) + a₃(3, 2, y, x) = (0, 0, 0, 0)
Expanding the left-hand side, we get
a₁ + 2a₂ + 3a₃ = 0
2a₁ + 3a₂ + xa₃ = 0
3a₁ + 2a₂ + ya₃ = 0
Solving these equations, we find that a₁ = a₂ = a₃ = 0. This contradicts the assumption that the constants are not all equal to zero, so the vectors in S must be linearly independent.
Therefore, the dimension of Span(S) is 3.
To know more about the dot product refer here,
https://brainly.com/question/23477017#
#SPJ11
Complete question :
Problem 4. (15=10+5 points) Let -10:00) be a set of vectors in R4, where x and y are unknown real numbers. (1) Find the value of x and y such that S is an orthogonal set. (2) With the choice of x and y in (1), what is the dimension of Span(S)? Justify your answer. S = 2 3
Given: (2x + 3y – z)² – xyz = 0 - Evaluate: dz /dy
To evaluate dz/dy, we need to differentiate the given equation with respect to y while treating z as a constant.
Let's calculate it step by step:
Given equation: (2x + 3y - z)² - xyz = 0
Differentiating both sides with respect to y:
d/dy[(2x + 3y - z)² - xyz] = d/dy[0]
Using the chain rule, we can differentiate each term separately:
d/dy[(2x + 3y - z)²] - d/dy[xyz] = 0
Now, let's calculate each derivative separately:
1. Differentiating (2x + 3y - z)² with respect to y:
To do this, we need to use the chain rule. Let's denote u = 2x + 3y - z.
Then, d(u²)/dy = 2u * du/dy
du/dy = d(2x + 3y - z)/dy
= 3
Therefore, d(u²)/dy = 2u * du/dy
= 2(2x + 3y - z) * 3
= 6(2x + 3y - z)
2. Differentiating xyz with respect to y:
Here, x and z are constants with respect to y, so we can treat them as such.
d(xyz)/dy = x * d(yz)/dy
= x * (z * dy/dy + y * dz/dy)
= x * (z + y * dz/dy)
= xyz + xy * dz/dy
Now, let's substitute these derivatives back into the original equation:
6(2x + 3y - z) - (xyz + xy * dz/dy) = 0
Simplifying the equation:
12x + 18y - 6z - xyz - xy * dz/dy = 0
Isolating dz/dy:
-xy * dz/dy = -12x - 18y + 6z - xyz
Finally, solving for dz/dy:
dz/dy = (-12x - 18y + 6z - xyz) / (-xy)
So, the value of dz/dy is (-12x - 18y + 6z - xyz) / (-xy).
To know more about equation visit:
brainly.com/question/29538993
#SPJ11
A survey found that women's heights are normally distributed with mean 63.3 in, and standard deviation 2.7 in, The survey also found that meris heights gee normaly ditenbufed With mean 68.8 in. and ctandard deviation 3.2in. Wost of the lve chardcters employed at an arrusement park, have height tequirements of a minimum of 57 . in, and a maimurn of 63 in Complefe parts (a) and (b) below. a. Find the percentage of men meeting the height teguitement. What does the result suggest about the gendors of the peoplo who aro employed as characters ot the amurement park? The peicentage of men who meot the height requiremen is (Round to tho decimal places as needed.) Since most men the height requirement, it is they that most of the characters are b. If the heighy requinements are changed to excluce only the tallost 50% of men and the shortest 5% of men, what are the new height requirements? The new height requirements are a minimum of in. and a maxinwim of (Round to one decimal place as needed)
Let's represent the percentage of men who meet the height requirement by P(X < 63) since the maximum height requirement is 63 in.According to Chebyshev's theorem, the percentage of data that lie within k standard deviations of the mean is at least 100(1 - 1/k^2)% for any k > 1.
Hence, the percentage of data that lie within 2 standard deviations of the mean is at least 75% since k=2.As a result, the percentage of men who meet the height requirement is at least 75%.Meaning, in general, a significant percentage of men would be able to meet the height requirement set by the amusement park. But, we don't know how many men are required for the job. It is assumed that most men meet the height requirement based on the percentage.Based on the percentage of men who meet the height requirement, it suggests that the majority of characters at the amusement park are men since most men meet the requirement. Therefore, it indicates that the amusement park industry needs to work on hiring women to diversify their employee portfolio.
Let's find the height requirements to exclude only the tallest 50% and the shortest 5% of men. The height requirement will be at the 50th percentile, i.e., the median height of the sample since we're eliminating the tallest 50% of men. Thus, the median height is given by:P(X < median) = 50/100.
Using the z-score formula, we can find the z-score corresponding to the 50th percentile.z = (X - μ) / σ0.50 = (X - 68.8) / 3.2X = 68.8 + 3.2 × 0.50X = 70.4 inTherefore, the new minimum height requirement is 57 in and the new maximum height requirement is 70.4 in since we're excluding the shortest 5% of men and setting the height requirement to 70.4 in.
The height requirement is in the range of 57 to 70.4 inches. Any applicant who falls in this range is eligible for the job. If we raise the height requirement from 63 inches to 70.4 inches, it will help to bring more men into the industry. Thus, we need to revise the height requirement to have more men in the industry.
The percentage of men who meet the height requirement is at least 75%, which indicates that most men could fit the criteria for the job. Based on the percentage, it also suggests that most of the characters at the amusement park are men, so it's vital for the industry to hire women and diversify their employee portfolio. In contrast, if we revise the height requirement to exclude the tallest 50% and the shortest 5% of men, the new height requirement is in the range of 57 to 70.4 inches. Applicants who fall in this range are eligible for the job. So, we need to revise the height requirement to have more men in the industry.
To know more about Chebyshev's theorem :
brainly.com/question/30584845
#SPJ11
Could tell me how to use this thm lim x approaches 0 sinx/x=1 to
explain this for me please!
Don't use L'hospital Rule.
thm lim x approaches 0 sinx/x=1 to without L'hospital Rule.
The Theorem:
The theorem states that as x approaches 0, the limit of sin(x)/x is equal to
To understand this theorem, we can consider the properties of the sine function and use a geometric interpretation. The sine function represents the ratio of the length of the side opposite an angle in a right triangle to the length of the hypotenuse. As x approaches 0, we can consider a right triangle where the angle approaches 0 degrees.
Let's consider a small angle, θ, which is very close to 0. In this case, we can approximate the sine of θ as the length of the arc formed by θ on the unit circle. Similarly, x can be considered as the length of the arc on the unit circle that subtends the same angle θ.
Using this approximation, we have sin(x) ≈ x, since both represent the lengths of the same arc on the unit circle for a small angle θ. Dividing sin(x) by x, we get sin(x)/x ≈ x/x = 1.
To formalize the calculation, we can use the squeeze theorem to establish the equality. The squeeze theorem states that if g(x) ≤ f(x) ≤ h(x) for all x in an interval (except possibly at the limit point), and lim[x→a] g(x) = lim[x→a] h(x) = L, then lim[x→a] f(x) = L.
In our case, we have -1 ≤ sin(x)/x ≤ 1 for all x ≠ 0, as sin(x) lies between -1 and 1. Taking the limit as x approaches 0, we have:
-1 ≤ sin(x)/x ≤ 1
As x approaches 0, both -1 and 1 remain constant, and we can conclude that the limit of sin(x)/x as x approaches 0 is also 1.
In conclusion, the theorem states that the limit of sin(x)/x as x approaches 0 is equal to 1. We explained this result using the properties of the sine function and a geometric interpretation of the unit circle. By considering a small angle θ, we approximated sin(x) as x, leading to sin(x)/x ≈ x/x = 1. Additionally, we used the squeeze theorem to establish the formal equality.
To know more about sinx, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/2321050
#SPJ11
Find the minimum and maximum values of z=7x+3y, if possible, for the following set of constraints. 3x+6y
x+6y
x≥0,y
≥18
≥12
≥0
Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box to complete your choice. A. The minimum value is (Round to the nearest tenth as needed.) B. There is no minimum value. Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box to complete your choice. A. The maximum value is . (Round to the nearest tenth as needed.) B. There is no maximum value.
The given set of constraints is 3x + 6y ≥ 18, x + 6y ≥ 12, and x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0. To find the minimum and maximum values of z = 7x + 3y, we can graph the feasible region determined by the intersection of these constraints .
Upon graphing the constraints, we observe that the feasible region is a triangular region with vertices at (0, 3), (0, 6), and (6, 0). Since the objective function z = 7x + 3y represents a straight line with a positive slope,
it is clear that the maximum value of z will occur at the vertex (6, 0) since it lies on the boundary of the feasible region. Plugging the values into z = 7x + 3y, we find the maximum value of z to be 7(6) + 3(0) = 42.
On the other hand, there is no minimum value for z since the feasible region extends infinitely in the positive direction. Therefore, the correct choices are A) There is no minimum value, and A) The maximum value is 42.
Learn more about value here:
brainly.com/question/30145972
#SPJ11
Country A has an exponential growth rate of 3.9% per year. The population is currently 5,797,000, and the land area of Country A is 40,000,000,000 square yards. Assuming this growth rate continues and is exponential, after how long will there be one person for every square yard of land? This will happen in year(s). (Round to the nearest integer.)
After approximately 367 years, there will be one person for every square yard of land in Country A.
To determine the time it takes for there to be one person for every square yard of land in Country A, we need to calculate the population when the population density reaches one person per square yard.
The population density is given by the ratio of the population to the land area:
Population density = Population / Land area.
Let's denote the population density as D, population as P, and land area as A.
D = P / A.
We want to find the time when the population density D becomes 1 person per square yard, so D = 1.
1 = P / A.
Rearranging the equation, we have:
P = A.
Now, we can use the formula for exponential growth to find the time it takes for the population to reach the land area.
The exponential growth formula is:
P(t) = P₀ * (1 + r)^t,
where P(t) is the population at time t, P₀ is the initial population, r is the growth rate, and t is the time.
In this case, P₀ = 5,797,000, r = 3.9% = 0.039, and P(t) = A = 40,000,000,000 (since we want the population to reach the land area).
Substituting the values into the formula, we have:
40,000,000,000 = 5,797,000 * (1 + 0.039)^t.
Dividing both sides by 5,797,000, we get:
6,902.45 ≈ (1.039)^t.
Taking the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides, we have:
ln(6,902.45) ≈ ln(1.039)^t.
Using logarithmic properties, we can bring down the exponent:
ln(6,902.45) ≈ t * ln(1.039).
Dividing both sides by ln(1.039), we can solve for t:
t ≈ ln(6,902.45) / ln(1.039).
Using a calculator, we find:
t ≈ 366.88.
Rounded to the nearest integer, after approximately 367 years, there will be one person for every square yard of land in Country A.
Learn more about square yard here
https://brainly.com/question/30683110
#SPJ11
Christina went to the store and spent $6.91 for her science project. She gave the cashier $9.00. Estimate the amount of change the cashier should give Christina.
2
3
4
15
Answer:
2,09
Step-by-step explanation:
9.00 - 6.91 = 2.09
In a single-component pressure-temperature diagram for a pure substance, which of the following phase boundaries will reside at the lowest pressure-temperature conditions?
Sublimation curve
Supercritical curve
Vaporization curve
Fusion (a.k.a. melting) curve
The sublimation curve will reside at the lowest pressure-temperature conditions in a single-component pressure-temperature diagram for a pure substance.
Explanation: In a pressure-temperature diagram, the sublimation curve represents the phase boundary between the solid and gas phases of a substance. It indicates the conditions at which a substance can undergo sublimation, which is the direct transition from the solid phase to the gas phase without passing through the liquid phase.
At the lowest pressure-temperature conditions, where the pressure and temperature are relatively low, the sublimation curve will be encountered. This is because sublimation generally occurs at lower pressures and temperatures compared to other phase transitions.
In contrast, the vaporization curve represents the phase boundary between the liquid and gas phases, and the fusion (or melting) curve represents the phase boundary between the solid and liquid phases. These curves generally occur at higher pressure-temperature conditions compared to the sublimation curve.
The supercritical curve represents the region where the substance exists as a supercritical fluid, which is a state above the critical temperature and pressure. This curve is typically found at higher pressure and temperature conditions compared to the sublimation curve.
Learn more about curve here:
https://brainly.com/question/31012623
#SPJ11
If side AB=24 what's the approximately value of X
Answer: 33.9cm
Step-by-step explanation: you know that AB and BC are the same lengths and because it is a right-angled triangle, you are going to use Pythagoras theorem. a²+b²=c². So you will write this in a calculator: √24² + 24² and you will get your answer.
In a distribution where the mean is 100 and the standard deviation is 3, find the largest fraction of the numbers that could meet the following requirements. less than 88 or more than 112 Cam
A distribution where the mean is 100 and the standard deviation is 3, The largest fraction of numbers that could meet the requirement of being less than 88 or more than 112 is 0.32 or 32%.
To find the largest fraction of numbers that could meet the requirements of being less than 88 or more than 112 in a distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 3, we can use the empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule.
According to the empirical rule, approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% falls within two standard deviations, and 99.7% falls within three standard deviations.
Since the mean is 100 and the standard deviation is 3, we can calculate the range within one standard deviation as follows:
Lower bound = 100 - 1 * 3 = 97
Upper bound = 100 + 1 * 3 = 103
This means that approximately 68% of the data falls within the range of 97 to 103.
To find the fraction of numbers that meet the requirement of being less than 88 or more than 112, we need to calculate the proportion of data that falls outside the range of 97 to 103.
Numbers less than 88 would be outside the lower bound (97), and numbers greater than 112 would be outside the upper bound (103).
To calculate the largest fraction of numbers that meet these requirements, we can subtract the proportion within the range from 1.
Proportion outside the range = 1 - Proportion within the range
Since 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation (in the range of 97 to 103), the proportion within the range is 0.68.
Proportion outside the range = 1 - 0.68 = 0.32
Therefore, the largest fraction of numbers that could meet the requirement of being less than 88 or more than 112 is 0.32 or 32%.
To know more about mean refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31101410#
#SPJ11
What is the value of the series 1/(n(n+6)) summed from n=1 to
infinity?
Since the integral diverges, the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) 1/(n(n+6)) also diverges.
To determine the value of the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) 1/(n(n+6)), we need to check if the series converges. We can use the integral test to determine convergence.
Let f(x) = 1/(x(x+6)), which is a positive, decreasing function for x ≥ 1. Integrating f(x) over the interval [1, ∞), we get:
∫[1, ∞] 1/(x(x+6)) dx = ln(x+6) - ln(x) evaluated from x = 1 to x = ∞
Taking the limit as x approaches ∞, ln(x) approaches ∞, and ln(x+6) approaches ∞ as well. Therefore, the integral diverges.
To know more about series,
https://brainly.com/question/32663710
#SPJ11
determine if the following pair of planes are parrallel,
perpendicular or neither. explain the answer
2x-9y+z-2=0
4x-5y+z-9=0
Dot product of the normal vectors: <2, -9, 1> ⋅ <4, -5, 1> = (2)(4) + (-9)(-5) + (1)(1) = 8 + 45 + 1 = 54
To determine if the planes are parallel, perpendicular, or neither, we can compare their normal vectors. The normal vector of a plane is the vector that is perpendicular to every vector in the plane. Two planes are parallel if their normal vectors are parallel, and they are perpendicular if their normal vectors are perpendicular.
To find the normal vectors of the given planes, we can look at the coefficients of x, y, and z in the equations of the planes.
For the first plane, 2x - 9y + z - 2 = 0, the coefficients of x, y, and z are 2, -9, and 1, respectively. Therefore, the normal vector of this plane is <2, -9, 1>.
For the second plane, 4x - 5y + z - 9 = 0, the coefficients of x, y, and z are 4, -5, and 1, respectively. Therefore, the normal vector of this plane is <4, -5, 1>.
Now, to determine if the planes are parallel, perpendicular, or neither, we can calculate the dot product of their normal vectors.
Dot product of the normal vectors: <2, -9, 1> ⋅ <4, -5, 1> = (2)(4) + (-9)(-5) + (1)(1) = 8 + 45 + 1 = 54
Since the dot product of the normal vectors is not zero, the planes are not perpendicular. And since the dot product is not a multiple of either vector, the planes are not parallel. Therefore, the planes are neither parallel nor perpendicular.
Learn more about vector from
https://brainly.com/question/15519257
#SPJ11
Effect size indicates whether one variable causes another. the amount of variance in a set of scores. whether an obtained research finding is valid. the strength of the relationship between variables.
Effect size is a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. It does not indicate whether one variable causes another. The amount of variance in a set of scores is measured by the variance.
Whether an obtained research finding is valid is determined by statistical significance. Effect size is a quantitative measure of the magnitude of the experimental effect.
It is a way of quantifying the strength of the relationship between two variables. Effect sizes are typically reported on a standardized scale, such as Cohen's d or r.
Effect size does not indicate whether one variable causes another. Causation can only be inferred from a well-designed experiment that controls for confounding variables.
Effect size can be used to assess the strength of the relationship between two variables, but it cannot be used to determine whether one variable causes another.
The amount of variance in a set of scores is measured by the variance. Variance is a measure of how spread out the scores are in a set.
A high variance indicates that the scores are spread out over a wide range, while a low variance indicates that the scores are clustered together.
Whether an obtained research finding is valid is determined by statistical significance. Statistical significance is a measure of how likely it is that the observed results could have occurred by chance. A statistically significant result means that the observed results are unlikely to have occurred by chance alone.
Effect size, variance, and statistical significance are all important concepts in statistics. Effect size measures the strength of the relationship between two variables,
variance measures the spread of scores in a set, and statistical significance measures the likelihood that the observed results could have occurred by chance.
To know more about variable click here
brainly.com/question/2466865
#SPJ11
SCALCLS1 4.1.023. Sketch the graph of f by hand and use your sketch to find the absolute and local maximum and minimum values of f. (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE 1(x)-3-√x absolute maximum DETAILS obsolute minimum local maximum local minimum Need Help? Read Wacht 7. [-/1 Points] DETAILS SCALCLS1 4.1.027.MI. Find the critical numbers of the function. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list. If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) f(x)=x²6x²-36x Need Help? Read it Watch Master it MY NOTES MY NOTES
The graph of the function f(x)=x²+6x²-36x is shown below: Graph of the function f(x)=x²+6x²-36xTo find the absolute maximum and minimum values of the function, we need to find its critical points and its value at the endpoints of its domain. To find the critical points, we differentiate the function f with respect to x and set the derivative equal to zero to solve for x: f'(x) = 2x + 12x - 36 = 0
Simplifying the above equation gives:
2x + 12x - 36 = 0
=> 14x - 36 = 0
=> 14x = 36
=> x = 36/14
Therefore, the only critical number of the function is 36/14, which is approximately equal to 2.57.We also need to check the endpoints of the domain of the function, which is the set of all real numbers. Since the domain is infinite, we need to take the limit of the function as x approaches infinity and negative infinity. We have:
f(x) = x²+6x²-36xf(x) = 7x²-36x
As x approaches infinity, f(x) approaches positive infinity, and as x approaches negative infinity, f(x) approaches positive infinity.
To know more about minimum visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21426575
#SPJ11
mandy is watching a space shuttle launch from an observation spot 8 miles away. find the angle of elevation from mandy to the space shuttle, which is at a height of 0.8 miles.
Angle of elevation from Mandy to the space shuttle, The tangent function relates the angle of elevation to the opposite and adjacent sides of a right triangle. The angle of elevation is 5.71 degrees.
In this scenario, the height of the space shuttle acts as the opposite side and the distance from Mandy to the shuttle acts as the adjacent side of the right triangle.Given that the height of the shuttle is 0.8 miles and the distance from Mandy to the shuttle is 8 miles, we can use the tangent function:
tangent(angle) = opposite/adjacent
tangent(angle) = 0.8/8 Simplifying the equation, we get: tangent(angle) = 0.1 To find the angle itself, we need to take the inverse tangent (arctan) of both sides: angle = arctan(0.1)
Using a calculator, the approximate value of the angle is 5.71 degrees.Therefore, the angle of elevation from Mandy to the space shuttle is approximately 5.71 degrees.
To learn more about angle of elevation click here : brainly.com/question/29008290
#SPJ11
complex analysis. Prove: \( \operatorname{Arg}(z) \) is not analytic on \( \mathbb{C} \).
The argument function, Arg(z), defined as arctan(y/x) for a complex number z = x + iy, fails to satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, indicating that it is not analytic on the complex plane (ℂ). The partial derivatives of Arg(z) with respect to x and y do not satisfy the required conditions for analyticity.
To prove that the argument function, Arg(z), is not analytic on the complex plane, we can show that it fails to satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
Let's consider a complex number z = x + iy, where x and y are the real and imaginary parts of z, respectively. The argument of z, Arg(z), is defined as the angle between the positive real axis and the line segment joining the origin to the point representing z in the complex plane.
The argument function can be expressed as Arg(z) = arctan(y/x), where arctan denotes the principal value of the arctangent function.
Now, we can compute the partial derivatives of Arg(z) with respect to x and y:
[tex]\frac{\partial \text{Arg}}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial \arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}{\partial x} = -\frac{y}{x^2 + y^2}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial \text{Arg}}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial \arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}{\partial y} = \frac{x}{x^2 + y^2}[/tex]
Now, let's examine the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which state that if a function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is analytic, then the partial derivatives of u and v with respect to x and y must satisfy the following conditions:
[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}[/tex]
In the case of the argument function, we have u(x, y) = Arg(z) and v(x, y) = 0 (since the argument is a real number). Therefore, we can compare the partial derivatives of u and v with those of Arg(z):
[tex]\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x} &= -\dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} \\\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y} &= \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \\\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x} &= 0 \\\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y} &= 0[/tex]
As we can see, the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satisfied since the conditions [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}[/tex]do not hold.
Therefore, the argument function, Arg(z), is not analytic on the complex plane (ℂ).
To know more about the argument function refer here,
https://brainly.com/question/30196966#
#SPJ11
If \( \bar{F}(t)=3 \sec t \bar{i}-t \bar{j}+\ln t \bar{k} \) and \( \bar{G}(t)=t^{\prime} \bar{k} \), find \( \frac{d}{d t}[\bar{F}(t) \bullet \bar{G}(t)] \).
The value of the derivative is found to be 3sec(t) + 3t(sec(t))(tan(t)) - 2t
To find d/dt[F(t)·G(t)], we need to take the derivative of the dot product F(t)·G(t) with respect to t.
Given:
F(t) = 3sec(t)i - tj + ln(t)k
G(t) = tk
The dot product of two vectors A = A₁i + A₂j + A₃k and B = B₁i + B₂j + B₃k is given by,
A · B = A₁B₁ + A₂B₂ + A₃B₃
Therefore, F(t)·G(t) can be calculated as,
F(t)·G(t) = (3sec(t))(t) + (-t)(t) + (ln(t))(0) = 3tsec(t) - t²
Now, we differentiate F(t)·G(t) with respect to t,
d/dt[F(t)·G(t)] = d/dt[3tsec(t) - t²]
Using the rules of differentiation, we can differentiate each term separately,
d/dt[3tsec(t)] = 3sec(t) + 3t(sec(t))(tan(t))
d/dt[-t²] = -2t
Putting it all together, we have,
d/dt[F(t)·G(t)] = d/dt[3tsec(t) - t²] = 3sec(t) + 3t(sec(t))(tan(t)) - 2t
Therefore, the derivative of F(t)·G(t) with respect to t is:
d/dt[F(t)·G(t)] = 3sec(t) + 3t(sec(t))(tan(t)) - 2t
To know more about differentiation, visit,
https://brainly.com/question/954654
#SPJ4
Complete question - If F(t) = 3sec(t)i - tj + ln(t)k and G(t) = tk, find d/dt[F(t)·G(t)]
Choose SSS,SAS,or neighter to compare these two triangles
A.SAS
B.neither
C.SSS
Answer:
SAS
They have the same angle and sides.
Consider the following function. f(x,y)=x 4
−4xy 2
+3y 2
Since f(1,1)=0 and f y
(1,1)
=0, then there exists the implicit function y=φ(x) around (x,y)=(1,1) by the implicit function theorom. (i) Find the 1-st order differential coefficient of φ at x=1. φ ′
(1)= (ii) Find the 2-nd order differential coefficient of φ at x=1, see Hint: φ ′′
(1)=
The correct is φ''(1) = 12. Hence, the 1st order differential coefficient of φ at x = 1 is φ'(1) = 0, and the 2nd order differential coefficient of φ at x = 1 is φ''(1) = 12.
To find the 1st and 2nd order differential coefficients of φ at x = 1, we can differentiate the given function [tex]f(x, y)[/tex] and use the implicit function theorem.
(i) To find φ'(1), we differentiate [tex]f(x, y)[/tex] with respect to x and substitute x = 1 and y = 1:
[tex]\[f(x, y) = x^4 - 4xy^2 + 3y^2\][/tex]
Taking the partial derivative with respect to x:
[tex]\[\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = 4x^3 - 4y^2\][/tex]
Substituting x = 1 and y = 1:
[tex]\[\left. \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \right|_{(1,1)} = 4(1)^3 - 4(1)^2 = 0\][/tex]
Therefore, φ'(1) = 0.
(ii) To find φ''(1), we need to differentiate φ'(x). Since φ'(1) = 0, we differentiate the partial derivative expression of [tex]f(x, y)[/tex] with respect to x again:
[tex]\[\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(4x^3 - 4y^2)\][/tex]
Differentiating each term:
[tex]\[\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(4x^3) = 12x^2\][/tex]
[tex]\[\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(-4y^2) = 0\][/tex]
Substituting x = 1 and y = 1:
[tex]\[\left. \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) \right|_{(1,1)} = 12(1)^2 + 0 = 12\][/tex]
Therefore, φ''(1) = 12.
Hence, the 1st order differential coefficient of φ at x = 1 is φ'(1) = 0, and the 2nd order differential coefficient of φ at x = 1 is φ''(1) = 12.
To know more about coefficient visit-
brainly.com/question/33114575
#SPJ11
7. Prove the following trigonometric identity: sin 2x 1 - cos 2x = cot x
Proving trigonometric identities requires a combination of algebraic manipulation and basic trigonometric properties. To prove the identity sin(2x) + 1 - cos(2x) = cot(x), we will use the following trigonometric identities:
cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1, sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x), and cot(x) = cos(x) / sin(x).
First, we will manipulate the left-hand side of the equation using the trigonometric identities:
sin(2x) + 1 - cos(2x) = (2sin(x)cos(x)) + 1 - (cos^2(x) - sin^2(x))= 2sin(x)cos(x) + 1 - cos^2(x) + sin^2(x)
Then, we will use the identity cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1 to simplify the equation:
2sin(x)cos(x) + 1 - cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) + 1 - 1= 2sin(x)cos(x)
Finally, we will use the identity cot(x) = cos(x) / sin(x) to rewrite the right-hand side of the equation as cot(x):
cot(x) = cos(x) / sin(x)
Thus, sin(2x) + 1 - cos(2x) = cot(x), which proves the given trigonometric identity.
To know more about trigonometric identities visit :
https://brainly.com/question/24377281
#SPJ11
The standard deviation for a population is σ=14.6. A sample of 17 observations selected from this population gave a mean equal to 138.30. The population is known to have a normal distribution. Round your answers to two decimal places. a. Make a 99% confidence interval for μ.
The 99% confidence interval (CI) for population mean is CI = (121.55, 155.05)
How to calculate confidence interval
Since we are given the value for standard deviation, we can calculate the confidence interval for the population mean using the formula;
CI = X ± zα/2 × σ/√n
where
X is the sample mean,
σ is the population standard deviation,
n is the sample size,
zα/2 is the critical value from the standard normal distribution
√n is the square root of the sample size.
Substitute the given values in the equation, we have
CI = 138.30 ± 2.898 × 14.6 / √17
CI = (121.55, 155.05)
Therefore, the confidence interval for the population mean is
CI = (121.55, 155.05)
Learn more on confidence interval on https://brainly.com/question/17097944
#SPJ4
For the function f(x) = 2x² + 2, it is given that Provide your answer below: C 8 Tren At what value c does the function f(x) attain its average value f(c)? Submit an exact answer. || f(x) dx = 1072 3
The function f(x) = 2x² + 2 attains its average value f(c) at c = ±(√1607)/3.
Let the function be f(x) = 2x² + 2.
For the given function, the average value f(c) is given by
f(c) = (1/(b - a)) ∫ [a, b] f(x) dx
Given that f(x) dx = 1072/3.
Also, the interval [a, b] is not given.
We can still find the value of c using the following method:
Let c be such that
f(c) = (1/(b - a)) ∫ [a, b] f(x) dx
We have
f(c) = (1/(b - a)) ∫ [a, b] f(x) dx = (1/(b - a)) × (1072/3)
f(c) = (2/3) × [(b³ - a³)/3 + 2(b - a)]
Using the above expression for f(c) and simplifying, we get:
(2/3) × [(b³ - a³)/3 + 2(b - a)] = 2c² + 2
Multiplying both sides by (3/2), we get:
[(b³ - a³)/3 + 2(b - a)] = 3c² + 3
Multiplying both sides by 3, we get:
(b³ - a³) + 6(b - a) = 9c² + 9
Rearranging, we get:
9c² = (b³ - a³) + 6(b - a) - 9
Taking 9 common on the RHS, we get:
9c² = (b³ - a³ - 9) + 6(b - a)
Adding 9 on both sides, we get:
9c² + 9 = (b³ - a³ - 9) + 6(b - a) + 9
Simplifying, we get:
9(c² + 1) = b³ - a³ + 6(b - a)
Now, we need to find the value of c for which the above equation holds true.
We can do this by using the given value of f(x) dx as follows:
Given, f(x) dx = 1072/3
Also, we know that
∫ [a, b] f(x) dx = [(b³ - a³)/3 + 2(b - a)]
Substituting this value of ∫ [a, b] f(x) dx in the given equation,
we get:(b³ - a³)/3 + 2(b - a) = (1072/3) / (2/3)
Multiplying both sides by 3/2, we get:
(b³ - a³)/3 + 2(b - a) = 536
Multiplying both sides by 3, we get:
(b³ - a³) + 6(b - a) = 1608
Substituting this value in the earlier equation, we get:
9(c² + 1) = 1608
Simplifying, we get:
c² + 1 = 1608/9
c² = 1607/9
c = ±(√1607)/3
to know more about functions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
