luke buys 4 apples and 5 banana the total is pound 3.70p one apples costs 35p work out the cost of the banana​

The width of the screen is approximately 6.63 inches.

Let's assign variables to represent the width and diagonal distance of the screen. Let's use "w" for width and "d" for diagonal distance. We know that the height of the screen is 10 inches. Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can write:

d² = w² + 10²

We also know that the diagonal distance of the screen is 12 inches. Substituting this value into the equation, we get:

12² = w² + 10²

Simplifying and solving for "w," we get:

144 - 100 = w²

44 = w²

w = √(44)

w ≈ 6.63 inches

To know more about width here

https://brainly.com/question/18408802

#SPJ4

Base 2 representation, a normal number is one in which the most significant bit of the significand is zero is True.

In binary representation, a normal number is one in which the most significant bit of the significant is [tex]1,[/tex]followed by a sequence of other bits that represent the fractional part of the number. However, since the most significant bit of the significant is always [tex]1[/tex] in normalized binary floating-point numbers, the leading bit is often implied and not explicitly stored in memory. Therefore, a normal number can be represented by a binary sequence that starts with [tex]1[/tex] followed by some fractional bits

A Binary Number System is the simplest form of number system that uses only two digits that is [tex]0[/tex](zero) and[tex]1[/tex](one). It is also called as base 2 numeral system. This number is mostly used in computer architecture and electronic devices. Examples of Binary Number System: [tex]01, 101, 1110, 10011, 1011101[/tex], and so on..

To know more about binary number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28222245

#SPJ4

the approximate area of the base of the paint can is 53.5 square centimeters.by using Volume formula is Base Area × Height

To find the approximate area of the base of the paint can, we can use the formula for the volume of a cylinder:

Volume = Base Area × Height

We are given the volume (535 cubic centimeters) and the height (10 cm). We need to solve for the Base Area. Rearranging the formula to solve for Base Area, we get:

Base Area = Volume ÷ Height

Now, substitute the given values:

Base Area = 535 cubic centimeters ÷ 10 cm

Base Area ≈ 53.5 square centimeters

So, the approximate area of the base of the paint can is 53.5 square centimeters.

To know more about area Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20898622

#SPJ11

The approximate area of the base of the can is 53.5 square centimeters

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Volume = 535 cubic centimeters of paint

Height of container = 10 cm

The area of the base of the can is calculated as

Base area = Volume/Height

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Base area = 535/10

Evaluate

Base area = 53.5

Hence, the base area is 53.5 square centimeters

Read more about volume at

https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ4

Answer:

On x < -5, the function is increasing.

To calculate the probabilities in this scenario, we need to understand the concept of combinations. A combination is the number of ways to choose a specific number of objects from a larger set, without regard to the order in which the objects are chosen. In this case, we can use the formula for combinations to determine the probabilities.

(a) To find the probability that the number 3 appears at least once, we need to calculate the probability of drawing at least one 3 in four draws without replacement. We can calculate this by finding the probability of drawing no 3's and subtracting that from 1. The probability of not drawing a 3 in the first draw is 7/10, and this decreases by 1/9 in each subsequent draw. So the probability of not drawing any 3's in four draws is (7/10) x (6/9) x (5/8) x (4/7) = 0.252. Subtracting this from 1 gives us the probability of drawing at least one 3, which is 0.748.

(b) To find the probability of drawing four numbers in a strictly increasing order, we need to consider the number of ways this can be done. There is only one way to choose four numbers in a strictly increasing order, so the probability is 1/10 x 1/9 x 1/8 x 1/7 = 0.00018.

(c) To find the probability of drawing four numbers with a sum of 13, we need to consider the combinations of numbers that could add up to 13. These are: 1+2+5+5, 1+3+4+5, 2+3+4+4. For each of these combinations, we can calculate the probability of drawing them by multiplying the probabilities of each individual draw. For example, the probability of drawing 1+2+5+5 is (1/10) x (2/9) x (1/8) x (1/7) = 0.000028. The probability of drawing 1+3+4+5 is (1/10) x (2/9) x (3/8) x (1/7) = 0.000054. The probability of drawing 2+3+4+4 is (1/10) x (2/9) x (2/8) x (1/7) = 0.000042. Adding these probabilities together gives us the total probability of drawing numbers with a sum of 13, which is 0.000124.

In summary, the probabilities in this scenario can be calculated using the concept of combinations. The probability of drawing at least one 3 is 0.748, the probability of drawing four numbers in a strictly increasing order is 0.00018, and the probability of drawing numbers with a sum of 13 is 0.000124.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

Based on the data provided, we can conduct a hypothesis test to determine if there is a difference in the median delivery times for the two services. We can use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, since the data is not normally distributed.

The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the median delivery times between the two services, while the alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference. We can set the level of significance at 0.05.

Using the data provided, we can calculate the median delivery time for each service:

- Service 1: Median delivery time = 24.5 + 26.0 + 28.0 + 21.0 + 18.0 + 36.0 + 25.0 + 21.0 + 24.0 + 26.0 + 31.0 / 11 = 25.5 hours
- Service 2: Median delivery time = 28.0 + 25.5 + 32.0 + 20.0 + 19.5 + 28.0 + 29.0 + 22.0 + 23.5 + 29.5 + 30.0 / 11 = 27.0 hours

To conduct the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, we need to calculate the U statistic. We can use Table 1 in Appendix B to find the critical values for U.

The U statistic is calculated as follows:

- Rank all the observations together from lowest to highest, ignoring which service they belong to.
- Assign ranks to each observation, with the lowest observation receiving a rank of 1 and so on.
- Add up the ranks for each service separately.
- Calculate the U statistic using the following formula: U = n1n2 + n1(n1 + 1) / 2 - R1, where n1 is the sample size for Service 1, n2 is the sample size for Service 2, and R1 is the sum of the ranks for Service 1.

Using the data provided, we can calculate the U statistic as follows:

- Ranks for Service 1: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 8, 2, 7, 9, 10
- R1 = 1 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 11 + 8 + 2 + 7 + 9 + 10 = 66
- U = n1n2 + n1(n1 + 1) / 2 - R1 = 11 x 11 + 11(11 + 1) / 2 - 66 = 35

Using Table 1 in Appendix B with a sample size of 11 for both services and a level of significance of 0.05, we find the critical value of U to be 19. Since our calculated U of 35 is greater than the critical value of 19, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the median delivery times for the two services.

In conclusion, the data provided suggests that there is a difference in the median delivery times for the two services. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine this, and the critical value of U was found to be 19. Since our calculated U was greater than 19, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the median delivery times.

Learn more about sample size here:

brainly.com/question/25894237

#SPJ11

a) The sample mean years to maturity for corporate bonds = 16.9625

and the sample standard deviation =  8.2232

b) A 95% confidence interval for the population mean years to maturity: (14.4141, 19.5112)

c) The sample mean yield on corporate bonds is 4.5405

and the sample standard deviation = 2.3082

d) A 95% confidence interval for the population mean yield on corporate bonds:  (3.825, 5.256)

a) The mean of the sample would be,

[tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = (10.25 + 28 +  23 + 13.25 + 3, 7.5 + 26.5 + 21.25 + 3.25, 19 + 9.25 + 28.75 + 1.75 + 17 + 8.75 + 24 + 24.5 + 18+ 11.75 + 22 + 22.75 + 27.75 + 16.75 + 12 + 16.5 + 23.75 + 25.25 + 25.75 + 22.5 + 1.25 + 19.5 + 12.5 + 27.25 + 19.5 + 17.75 + 11.5+ 3.5 + 20 + 25.25 + 6.75) / 40

[tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 678.5 / 40

[tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 16.9625

And  the sample standard deviation would be,

s = √(67.6203)

s =  8.2232

b)

We know that the formula for the confidence interval is,

CI = [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] ± (z × s/√n)

Here, n = 40, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 16.9625, s = 8.2232 and z = 1.9600

Using above formula the 95% confidence interval for the population mean years to maturity would be,

CI = 16.9625 ± (1.9600 × 8.2232/√40)

CI = (16.9625 ± 2.548)

CI =  (16.9625 - 2.548,  16.9625 + 2.548)

CI = (14.4141, 19.5112)

c) Consider sample yield on corporate bonds.

The mean would be,

[tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 181.62 / 40

[tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 4.5405

And the standard deviation would be,

s = √(5.327594)

s = 2.3082

d) Now we construct a 95% confience interval.

Here, n = 40, s = 2.3082, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 4.4505, and z = 1.9600

Using above formula the 95% confidence interval for the population mean years to maturity would be,

CI =  4.4505 ± (1.9600 × 2.3082/√40)

CI = (4.5405 ± 0.716)

CI = (4.5405 - 0.716, 4.5405 + 0.716)

CI = (3.825, 5.256)

Learn more about the confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

Find the complete question below.

Based on the given side lengths a=3.5 cm, b=√18 cm (which is approximately 4.24 cm), and c=6 cm, the triangle is an scalene triangle.

Triangles are described in terms of their sides and angles in geometry. A closed planar three-sided polygon shape with three sides and three angles is known as a triangle. The lengths of the sides of a scalene triangle vary. They are not equal, and the angles have three measurements. However, it still has a 180° angle sum, just like all triangles.

A scalene triangle is a triangle with three different side lengths and three different angle measurements. The total of all internal angles, however, is always equal to 180 degrees. As a result, it satisfies the triangle's condition of angle sum.

Visit here to learn more about polygon  : brainly.com/question/24464711

#SPJ11

The system has a unique solution, and therefore, there is only one solution to the system of equations.

Given the system of equation in the question:

x + y = 7

2x - 3y = -21

First, solve one of the equations for one of the variables and substitute it into the other equation.

From equation (1), we can solve for y in terms of x as follows:

x + y = 7

y = 7 - x --- equation (3)

Now we can substitute equation (3) into equation (2) and solve for x:

2x - 3y = -21

Plug in y = 7 - x

2x - 3(7 - x) = -21

Simplifying the above equation, we get:

2x - 21 + 3x = -21

5x - 21 = -21

5x = 0

x = 0

Now we can substitute x = 0 into equation (1) to find y:

x + y = 7

Plug in x = 0

0 + y = 7

y = 7

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is x = 0, y = 7.

Learn more about system of equation here: brainly.com/question/30319215

#SPJ1

Answer:

730,

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 729, in 4th grade we learn if its higher than 5 or 5 we round up, 729 to the nearest 10th is 730.

hope this helps!

Answer: The mass of each coffee bean is

A- 9 kg

B - 15 kg

C - 21 kg

The cost per kg of the mixture is 10.8$

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio given for the three types of coffee beans is 3:5:7 so we have 3x, 5x, and 7x respectively.

3x + 5x + 7x = 45 kg

15x = 45

x = 3

Therefore  as we got the value of x we can multiply with their suitable ratios

3 X 3 = 9 kg (A)

5 X 3 = 15kg (B)

7 X 3 = 21kg (C)

For the second part,

As A costs 7$  per kg and we have 9 of it multiplied and we get 63 $

Similarly, performing for B and C we get 150$ and 273$ respectively.

As we got these prices for a total of 45 kg but we need the price per kg to divide the total sum by 45 and we get 10.8 $.

For more understanding use these links

https://brainly.com/question/3796978

Answer:

total ratio is 3+5+7 = 15

bag A = 3/15 * 45 = 9 kg

bag B = 5/15 * 45 = 15 kg

bag C = 7/15 * 45 = 21 kg

ii) bag A = $7 per kg

= 7*9 = $63

bag B = $10 per kg

= 10*15 = $150

bag C = $13 per kg

= 13*21 = $273

bag A+B+C = 63+150+273 = $486

therefore $486 for 45kg

cost per kg= 486/45 = $10.8

The power series approximation of f(x)g(x) up to order 3 is:

[tex]e^56 sin 8x - 22(5x)sin 8x - 2e^56(5x) + 22(5x)^2 sin 8x[/tex]

To find the power series expansion of the product f(x)g(x), we need to multiply the power series expansions of f(x) and g(x) and collect like terms.

First, let's find the power series expansion of f(x):

[tex]f(x) = e^56 - 2(5x)^"[/tex]

Using the formula for the power series expansion of e^x:

[tex]e^x = 1 + x + (x^2)/2! + (x^3)/3! + ...[/tex]

We can write the power series expansion of f(x) as:

[tex]f(x) = e^56 - 2(5x)^"[/tex]

[tex]= (1 + 56 + (56^2)/2! + (56^3)/3! + ...) - 2(5x)^(1)[/tex]

= [tex]1 - 5x + (56 - 25x^2) +[/tex]...

Now let's find the power series expansion of g(x):

g(x) = sin 8x

= (8x) - (8x)^3/3! + (8x)^5/5! - ...

Finally, we can multiply the power series expansions of f(x) and g(x) to get the power series expansion of f(x)g(x):

[tex]f(x)g(x) = (1 - 5x + (56 - 25x^2) + ...) * ((8x) - (8x)^3/3! + (8x)^5/5! - ...)[/tex]

[tex]= (8x) - (40x^2) + (568x^2)/2! + ((56-8*8)/2!)x^4 + ...[/tex]

Collecting like terms up to order 3, we get:

[tex]f(x)g(x) = (8x) - (40x^2) + (224x^3)/3! + ...[/tex]

Therefore, the power series approximation of f(x)g(x) up to order 3 is:

[tex]e^56 sin 8x - 22(5x)sin 8x - 2e^56(5x) + 22(5x)^2 sin 8x[/tex]

To know more about power series expansions, visit the link given below:

https://brainly.com/question/30262936

#SPJ4

a) The Venn diagram is as follows:

b) After selecting at random a Foster junior for a survey, the probability this student has taken at least 2 out of 3 courses is 0.61

c) After selecting at random a Foster junior for a survey, the probability this student has taken exactly one of the three courses is 0.06.

d) After selecting at random a Foster junior for a survey, the probability this student has taken at the most one course is 0.14.

b) To find the probability that the student has taken at least 2 out of 3 courses, we add the probabilities of the following three events: taking both Finance and Accounting, taking both Finance and Marketing, and taking both Accounting and Marketing, plus the probability of taking all three courses:

Therefore, the probability that the student has taken at least 2 out of 3 courses is 0.61.

c) To find the probability that the student has taken exactly one of the three courses, we add the probabilities of the following three events: taking Finance only, taking Accounting only, and taking Marketing only:

Therefore, the probability that the student has taken exactly one of the three courses is 0.06.

d) To find the probability that the student has taken at most one course, we add the probabilities of the following two events: taking no courses and taking exactly one course:

Therefore, the probability that the student has taken at most one course is 0.14.

To learn more about probabilities, here

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

After elimination of Smith from the votes  Russell will win the vacation package.

No, irrelevant alternative criterion does not violated the case because ranking of remaining candidates was not affected by Smith's removal.

To determine who will win the vacation package after eliminating Smith from consideration,

Conduct a pairwise comparison of the remaining candidates.

Comparing the number of times each candidate was ranked first, second, third, and fourth.

Comparing Evans, Russell, and Ford, we can see that,

Evans was ranked first 11 times, second 14 times, third 11 times, and fourth 9 times.

Russell was ranked first 14 times, second 11 times, third 9 times, and fourth 11 times.

Ford was ranked first 11 times, second 9 times, third 14 times, and fourth 11 times.

Based on these results, we can see that Russell was ranked first more often than the other candidates.

so Russell would be the winner of the vacation package.

As for the irrelevant alternative criterion, it is not violated in this case.

Smith was eliminated from consideration because they did not meet the original criteria.

So their removal from the voting does not change the fact that Evans, Russell, and Ford were the remaining candidates.

The ranking of the remaining candidates was not affected by Smith's removal, so the criterion is not violated.

learn more about win here

brainly.com/question/19470451

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete, the complete question is:

A county committee is trying to award a vacation package of a weekend at an Orlando resort to a deserving staff member, The votes are shown below:

                       11                  14                    11               9

1st Choice        Evans        Russell             Ford           Smith

2nd Choice      Russell      Ford                Smith          Evans

3rd Choice       Ford           Smith              Evans         Russell

4th Choice       Smith          Evans             Russell        Ford

The committee decides to use the Pairwise comparison method to determine the final winner. However, while finalizing the data, they find that Smith had won a significant prize during the last event and therefore did not meet the original criteria to be considered for the vacation package, so Smith is eliminated from the votes. Who actually will win the package? Is the irrelevant alternative criterion violated in this case? Why or why not?

The pigeonhole principle states that if there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then at least one pigeonhole must contain more than one pigeon. We can apply this principle to prove the following statements:

(a) Given any seven integers, there will be two that have a difference divisible by 6.

We can divide the integers into six pigeonholes based on their remainders when divided by 6: {0}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, and {5}. Since there are seven integers, by the pigeonhole principle, at least two integers must belong to the same pigeonhole. If two integers belong to the same pigeonhole, then their difference will be divisible by 6.

(b) Given any five integers, there will be two that have a sum or difference divisible by 7.

We can divide the integers into six pigeonholes based on their remainders when divided by 7: {0}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {5}, and {6}. Since there are five integers, by the pigeonhole principle, at least two integers must belong to the same pigeonhole. If two integers belong to the same pigeonhole, then their sum or difference will be divisible by 7.

Note that if the two integers have the same remainder when divided by 7, then their difference will be divisible by 7. If they have different remainders, then their sum will be divisible by 7.

Visit here to learn more about pigeonhole principle brainly.com/question/31687163

#SPJ11

a. Probability of a standard normal variable being between 0 and 0.60 is 0.2257.

b. Probability of a standard normal variable being between -1.65 and 0 is 0.4505.

c. Probability of a standard normal variable being greater than 0.30 is 0.3821.

d. Probability of a standard normal variable being greater than or equal to -0.35 is 0.6368.

e. Probability of a standard normal variable being less than 2.03 is 0.9798.

f. Probability of a standard normal variable being less than or equal to -0.80 is 0.2119.

Probability is the study of the chances of occurrence of a result, which are obtained by the ratio between favorable cases and possible cases.

a. P(0 ≤ z ≤ 0.60) = 0.2257

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being between 0 and 0.60 is 0.2257.

b. P(-1.65 ≤ z ≤ 0) = 0.4505

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being between -1.65 and 0 is 0.4505.

c. P(z > 0.30) = 0.3821

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being greater than 0.30 is 0.3821.

d. P(z ≥ -0.35) = 0.6368

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being greater than or equal to -0.35 is 0.6368.

e. P(z < 2.03) = 0.9798

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being less than 2.03 is 0.9798.

f. P(z ≤ -0.80) = 0.2119

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being less than or equal to -0.80 is 0.2119.

Learn more about probability on:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

True statements:

A) A test statistic could be unfavourable.

C) A hypothesized mean can be negative.

(A) A test statistic is a measure of how many standard errors a sample mean is away from a hypothesized population mean. Depending on if the sample mean is higher or lower than the hypothesised mean, it could be either positive or negative. For instance, the test result will be zero if the mean of the sample is lower than the hypothesised mean.

(B) A P-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value, given the null hypothesis is true. It is a probability, therefore it cannot be negative.

(C) A hypothesized mean can be negative, for example, in situations where we are interested in testing whether a new drug decreases blood pressure by a certain amount.

(D) A significance level is a chosen threshold for determining whether the null hypothesis should be rejected. It is a probability, therefore it cannot be negative.

(E) The P-value would be greater than 0.1587. Therefore, this statement is false.

To know more about probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

(a) Using a normal distribution and a 95% confidence interval, the true average failure strain for silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty to correct congenital nose deformities is estimated to be between 23.83% and 28.17%. This estimate conveys that we are 95% confident that the true average strain falls within this range, and the precision and reliability of this estimate is supported by the sample size and standard deviation.

(b) Using a normal distribution and a 95% prediction interval, the strain for a single adult is predicted to fall between 17.72% and 34.28%. This prediction conveys that we are 95% confident that the true strain for a single adult falls within this range, and the precision and reliability of this prediction is supported by the sample size and standard deviation.

The prediction interval in part (b) is much wider than the confidence interval in part (a). This is because the confidence interval in part (a) is estimating the range of the true average failure strain for the entire population, whereas the prediction interval in part (b) is estimating the range of possible failure strains for a single individual. This individual variation results in a wider prediction interval.

To know more about normal distribution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29509087

#SPJ11

The height of the pyramid is 16 feet.

What is Pythagoras Theorem?

Pythagoras' theorem is a fundamental principle in geometry that states that in a right triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides.

We can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the height of the pyramid.

The slant height of the pyramid is the hypotenuse of a right triangle whose legs are the height of the pyramid and half the length of the base of the pyramid. Since the base is a square, half the length of the base is 12 feet.

Using the Pythagorean theorem:

height² + 12² = 20²

height² = 20² - 12²

height² = 256

height = 16 feet

Therefore, the height of the pyramid is 16 feet.

To know more about Pythagoras theorem visit:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ4

The appropriate type of test for this scenario would be a paired-t test. A paired-t test is used when the same group of subjects are tested twice under different conditions.

In this case, the 20 students were tested before and after receiving the tutorial, making it a paired design.

A paired-t test compares the mean scores of the two tests and determines if there is a significant difference between them.

On the other hand, an independent sample t-test is used when two different groups are tested and compared. It would not be suitable in this scenario since the same group of students were tested twice. In summary, the main answer is that a paired-t test is appropriate in this case.

An explanation for this is that a paired-t test is used for within-subject designs, where the same group of subjects are tested twice under different conditions.

After mentioning that a paired-t test is more powerful and sensitive than an independent sample t-test in detecting significant differences between two sets of scores because it reduces variability between subjects.

To know more about sample t test visit:

brainly.com/question/30030593

#SPJ11

The answer is that the 70% confidence interval for the slope of the regression line using the provided data is between 0.0019 and 0.0037.


To calculate the 70% confidence interval for the slope of the regression line, we need to use the t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to n - 2, where n is the number of data points. In this case, n = 116, so we have 114 degrees of freedom.

Using a statistical software or calculator, we can find that the t-value for a 70% confidence interval with 114 degrees of freedom is approximately 1.648.

Next, we need to calculate the standard error of the slope, which is given by:

SE =√[ (SS_residuals / (n - 2)) / SS_x ]

where SS_residuals is the sum of squared residuals, SS_x is the sum of squared deviations of x from its mean, and n is the sample size.

Using the regression model provided, we can find that SS_residuals = 6.3574 and SS_x = 1484.9584. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

SE = √[ (6.3574 / (116 - 2)) / 1484.9584 ] = 0.00044

Finally, we can calculate the confidence interval for the slope using the formula:

slope +/- t * SE

where slope is the estimated slope from the regression model.

Plugging in the values, we get:

slope +/- 1.648 * 0.00044 = 0.0028 +/- 0.0007

Therefore, the 70% confidence interval for the slope of the regression line is between 0.0019 and 0.0037, rounded to 4 decimal places.

To know more about sampling error visit:

brainly.com/question/14382279

#SPJ11

Evaluating a linear equation we can see that after 2 days he will have 12 apps.

We can model this with a linear equation of the form:

y = ax + b

Where a is the slope and b is the initial value.

Here we know that the initial number of apps is 10, and the number of apps increases by 1 each day, then the slope is 1, so the linear equation is:

y = x + 10

To find the number of apps after 2 days we need to evaluate this in x = 2, we will get:

y = 2 + 10 = 12

There will be 12 apps.

Learn more about linear equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

#SPJ1

To estimate the sum of a convergent alternating series with an absolute error of less than 0.001, we can use the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem.

This theorem states that the error made by approximating the sum of an alternating series with the nth partial sum is less than or equal to the absolute value of the (n+1)th term.

In other words, if we want the absolute error to be less than 0.001, we need to find the smallest value of n such that |a(n+1)| < 0.001, where a(n) is the nth term of the alternating series.

Then, using the Alternating Series Test, we know that the terms of the series must approach zero as n goes to infinity. So, if we want the absolute error to be less than 0.001, we need to find the smallest value of n such that:

|a(n+1)| < 0.001

Now, we can rearrange this inequality to solve for n:

|a(n+1)| < 0.001

a(n+1) < 0.001 (since the series is alternating)

(-1)(n+1) * a(n+1) < 0.001 (-1 to account for the alternating signs)

a(n+1) > -0.001

Since the terms of the series are decreasing in magnitude, we can assume that the smallest value of |a(n+1)|. Therefore, we can set n = 1 to get:

|a(2)| < 0.001

|(-1)2 * a(2)| < 0.001

|a(2)| < 0.001

So the absolute error will be less than 0.001 if we use the first two terms of the series to estimate the sum.

The total of the convergent alternating series can be estimated with a minimum of two terms and an absolute error of less than 0.001.

To know more about Alternating Series Estimation Theorem visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31428802

#SPJ4

The difference between two means is statistically significant when (a) it is large enough that it could not have occurred because of sampling error.

In statistical hypothesis testing, we use a significance level, often denoted as alpha, to determine if a difference is statistically significant. If the p-value, which is the probability of obtaining the observed difference or a more extreme one if the null hypothesis is true, is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the difference is statistically significant.

It is important to note that statistical significance does not necessarily imply practical significance or managerial importance. A difference may be statistically significant but not meaningful in a practical sense, or vice versa. Therefore, it is important to consider both statistical and practical significance when interpreting the results of a hypothesis test.

Therefore, the correct option is (a) it is large enough that it could not have occurred because of sampling error.

To learn more about statistical hypothesis here

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ4

After the base is moved 4 feet away from the wall, the new height will be 46.7 feet.

We can view this as a right triangle, the length of the ladder is the hypotenuse, and we know that originally the ladder is set against the side of a house so that reaches up 48 feet.

The distance between the base of the ladder and the wall is given by Pythagorean's theorem, we can write:

D = √(50² - 48²)

D = 14

The original distance is 14ft, if we increase this by 4 we will get 18ft.

Now we can use the theorem again to get the new height:

H =  √(50² - 18²) = 46.7

So the new height is 46.7 feet.

Learn more about right triangles at:

https://brainly.com/question/2217700

#SPJ1

The value of variable x as required to be determined in the task content is; 25.

It follows from the task content that the value of the variable x is to be determined from the given equation.

Since the given equation is; log(3x+25) = 2; the base of the logarithm is said to be 10 so that we have;

3x + 25 = 10²

3x + 25 = 100

3x = 100 - 25

3x = 75

x = 25.

Consequently, the solution of the given equation is; x = 25.

Read more on logarithmic equation;

https://brainly.com/question/30717609

#SPJ1

To model the decrease in the value of the car over time, we can use an exponential function of the form:

V(t) = V(0) * e^(-rt)

where:

V(0) is the initial value of the car (in this case, $20,000).

r is the annual rate of depreciation, expressed as a decimal (in this case, 0.103).

t is the number of years since the car was purchased.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

V(t) = $20,000 * e^(-0.103t)

This is the exponential function that models the value of the car in t years.

Learn more about exponential function, here:

brainly.com/question/30493708

#SPJ11

The addition of the surds is determined as 11√19 + 38√71 + 51√13.

The surds can be added by simplifying each term as follows;

11√19 + 38√71 + 19√13 + 16√52

= 11√19 + 38√71 + 19√13 + 16(2√13)

= 11√19 + 38√71 + 19√13 + 32√13

So we will the similar terms as follows;

= 11√19 + 38√71 + (19√13 + 32√13)

= 11√19 + 38√71 + 51√13

Thus, the addition of the surds is determined by simplifying complex term to the lowest possible term.

Learn more about addition of surds here: https://brainly.com/question/27743084

#SPJ1

The equivalent expression to the -49y - 14 are as follow,

7(-7y -2) , -7(7y + 2) ,-1(49y + 14), -14(3.5y + 1), -98/7 - 49y and -7(7y + k₁) + k₂ where -14 = -k₁ + k₂.

Expression is equal to

-49y - 14

The equivalent expressions are ,

By taking -1 as common factor

-(49y + 14)

By taking -7 as common factor

-7(7y + 2)

By taking 7 as common factor .

7(-7y -2)

By taking -14 as common factor

-14(3.5y + 1)

By replacing -14  as -98/7

-98/7 - 49y

By replacing -14 = -21 + 7

-7(7y + 3) + 7

By replacing -14 = -28 + 14

-7(7y + 4) + 14

By replacing -14 = -35 + 21

-7(7y + 5) + 21

By replacing -14 = -42 + 28

-7(7y + 6) + 4

and many more.

All of these expressions are equivalent to -49y -14.

Therefore, the expression which are equivalent to the given expression are 7(-7y -2) , -7(7y + 2) ,-1(49y + 14), -14(3.5y + 1), -98/7 - 49y and -7(7y + k₁) + k₂ where -14 = -k₁ + k₂.

learn more about expression here

brainly.com/question/2882068

#SPJ4

(L2) The Incenter Theorem states that the incenter of a triangle is equidistant from each incenter of a triangle.

The Incenter Theorem is a fundamental result in geometry that describes a unique point within a triangle known as the incenter. The incenter is the point at which the angle bisectors of a triangle intersect.

The Incenter Theorem states that the incenter of a triangle is equidistant from each side of a triangle.

To understand this theorem, consider an arbitrary triangle ABC. Let I be the incenter of the triangle. The angle bisectors of the triangle, AI, BI, and CI, intersect the opposite sides at points D, E, and F, respectively.

According to the angle bisector theorem, these points divide the sides of the triangle into segments that are proportional to the adjacent sides.

for such more question on triangle

https://brainly.com/question/17335144

#SPJ11