The Law enforcement agencies are appointed by the government and hence work in cases which involve tasks of all nature. Private security works rather specifically for the individual who hires their services.
Law enforcement agencies are entrusted with tasks which include arrests, detective work, major crimes of violence, burglaries, auto theft, intellectual property crime, pirating of music etc.
Whereas, Private security works on tasks which include detective work, auto theft, Assisting with gangs and neighborhood crime, banking, patrolling educational institutions, gaming, construction fraud.
Few are common tasks of both like detective work, patrolling etc but it can be very well said that law enforcement agencies work in almost all areas on which private security works.
To know more about Law enforcement:
brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ1
Free hugs video What did you like about the verbal and non-verbal messages you saw and heard?
Answer:
What I liked about the verbal and nonverbal messages I saw in this video, First I absolutely lovedthe song. I have liked the Sick Puppies for a while and I thought the song was beautiful, and it gives the message that some times all someone needs is a hug. As Juan Mann stands in the street many people walk by him laughing and staring at him, then someone comes and hugs him. After I watched the video I looked up the lyrics of the some and read the information from the free hugs campaign website.
a plea in which a defendant accepts the penalty for committing a crime without admitting guilt is called:
A plea in which a defendant accepts the penalty for committing a crime without admitting guilt is called Nolo Contendere.
A decision made by the defendant in a criminal proceeding that permits conviction without admission of guilt. Likewise known as nolo contendre.
The defendant can contest the allegations in a civil lawsuit based on the same activities, even though a finding of guilt is recorded in the criminal court record.
A person's plea in a court of law is their declaration, in response to being accused of a crime, of whether or not they are guilty of that crime. He was questioned by the judge over his guilty plea. We'll enter a not-guilty plea. Her admission of guilt to manslaughter by provocation was turned down.
To know more about Plea visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27371182
#SPJ4
What is a term for a system with two or more governments exercising power over the same people and the same territory?.
Federalism is a term for a system with two or more governments exercising power over the same people and the same territory.
Federalism is a form of government wherein the two levels of authority share control over the same region. Larger territorial areas are typically governed more broadly by an overarching national government, while local concerns are handled by smaller divisions, states, and cities.
The central government and the local political entities both have the authority to enact laws and enjoy some degree of independence from one another. The Constitution of the United States created a system of "dual sovereignty," whereby the States preserved some sovereignty while ceding many of their authority to the Federal Government. There are some examples of this dual sovereignty listed in the U.S. Constitution.
To know more about Federalism:
brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
What is Gertrude doing Act 4 Scene 1?.
Gertrude tells Claudius about Hamlet's most recent actions. Summary Gertrude tells Claudius what transpired during her visit with Hamlet, visibly distressed.
What role does Gertrude play in Act 4?By announcing Ophelia's passing, Gertrude's appearance has an impact. She serves as the messenger during the entire performance. especially when she informs the audience that Ophelia has perished in the water. She has the most impact on this scene out of all the others.
What does King Claudius learn from Queen Gertrude in Act 4?She requests to talk with the king alone. She informs Claudius about her experience with Hamlet when Rosencrantz and Guildenstern leave. She informs Claudius that Hamlet has murdered Polonius and claims that he is as insane as the ocean during a storm.
To know more about Gertrude visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14679380
#SPJ4
in the context of life and death decisions, there is a distinction between killing and letting die. which of the following is classified as letting die?
Removing a patient from life support.
There is a moral difference between murdering and letting die in non-consequentialist ethical theory. Letting someone die entails withholding care, as opposed to killing.
There is a moral difference between euthanasia and letting someone die in the context of medical ethics.
It is reasonable to assume that when an agent kills, she accepts responsibility; yet, when an agent permits a death, she does not.
The moral difference between killing and letting someone die is found there. However, when an agent is already in charge of the surrounding circumstances, the distinction is lost.
According to Winston Nesbitt, he has demonstrated that, in all cases, killing someone is worse than letting them die. However, this conclusion is false.
Nesbitt is right when he says that sometimes killing is worse than letting someone die, but this isn't always the case.
To know more about euthanasia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3378948
#SPJ4
how did the collapse of communism help encourage the process of democratization
The collapse of communism helped encourage the process of democratization because, during the regime of communism, there were a lot of injustices.
Communism's atrocities were not restricted to mass slaughter. Even those who were lucky enough to escape faced tremendous repression, including abuses of freedom, expression, and religion, loss of property rights, and criminalization of everyday economic activities.
What is Communism?Communism is a far-left ideological, philosophical, and economic ideology and is ongoing within the socialist movement with the goal of establishing a communist society, a sociocultural order centered on shared ownership of the means of production, dispersion, and exchange that distributes products to everyone in the society.
Communist societies likewise lack personal land, social classes, money, and the state. Communists frequently advocate voluntary self-government, but they disagree on how to achieve it.
Learn more about Democratization:
https://brainly.com/question/1092276
#SPJ1
What role does Seneca Falls hold in American legal history?
the first county where slavery was officially abolished
the site of the beginning of the march towards women’s suffrage
the city where the Bill of Rights was signed and ratified
the site of the last major battle of the American Revolution
Seneca Falls hold in American legal history to site of the beginning of the march toward women’s suffrage. Thus, option B is correct.
What is Seneca Falls?
Seneca Falls is a charming rural community in New York's region. This wonderful city has placed a strong emphasis on women's issues and organizations, and it includes numerous historic locations that celebrate these causes. Numerous tourist sites may be found all across the city, including parks, local cafes, old houses, and galleries.
The Seneca Falls Convention would have been the country's first gathering on women's rights. The women's suffrage campaign was started at a convention held in Seneca Falls.
With over a century later, women were given the opportunity to vote. This was a major change in the way people live their life. Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about Seneca Falls, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12407657
#SPJ1
What is the exception to the two witness rule?.
Two witnesses are usually required to prove an overt act of treason. There is a so-called "documents exception" to the standard requirement of two witnesses in cases of perjury, which permits the sufficiency of one witness with supporting evidence.
The "two witness" rule, which was adopted from common law, governs how much evidence must be presented to prove a perjury charge under Section 1621. Wailer v. United States, 323 U.S. 606, 609 (1945). The law states that a conviction for perjury cannot be obtained solely from the unreliable testimony of a single witness.
The first time was when Paul remarked, "This is the third time I'm coming to you." This phrase is followed by Deuteronomy 19:15, which specifies that "every charge should be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."
To know more about two witness rule, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29546787
#SPJ4
How is Zootopia directly related to our Unit? Provide 4 examples/scenarios using our terms & concepts.
a)
b)
c)
d)
Despite the fact that Zootopia is a family-friendly picture, it subtly teaches young children about how societal concerns exist in the real world today. This video addresses issues such as sexism, racism, and political corruption, as well as discussion on how to combat them.
What Characters in Zootopia and their Stereotypes are?
Zootopia's animal kingdom stereotypes establish divisions between usually predatory and prey species, as well as between diverse mammals. Rabbits are regarded as being mainly employed as carrot farmers, whereas foxes are characterized as being untrustworthy and cunning.
In the film Zootopia, Nick Wilde is drowning in stereotypes since he is a fox, which is renowned for being a nasty predator, aggressive, and clever. Although Nick is a cunning, cunning fox, he has a tender side that he never shows. He always covers his emotions because he is meant to be sly and deceitful as a fox.
Learn more about Societal Concerns:
https://brainly.com/question/5105464
#SPJ1
In a real estate deed what does this statement mean 'Scribner is not insuring title and has made no title search and makes no opinion concerning the marketability of title in this transaction '.?
Answer:
which form of government is practice in Liberia
some courts, depending on the jurisdiction, will occasionally reform a covenant not to compete. in other words, if the restraints (time restrictions, territory restrictions, scope of activity restrictions) are found to be unreasonably broad, the court may convert the terms into reasonable ones and then enforce the reformed covenant. do you believe a court should reform and then enforce (as reformed) an unreasonably broad covenant? why or why not? do illinois courts reform and enforce unreasonably broad covenants? explain.
Because it can be challenging to establish verbal agreements between two or more parties, a court should only enforce written contracts and covenants. This will speed up the legal process.
A court should reform laws before enforcing them, as occasionally new laws need to be tested in the open before becoming universally binding. For instance, the national anthem should be played in all theaters before a film that has received mixed reviews, as the Supreme Court of India ordered. It would have been better for society as a whole if something similar had been tried out for a while prior to implementing this reform.Rectrictive covenants shouldn't be upheld because they tend to become obsolete or expire over time. A reasonable restrictive covenant should not be enforced unnecessarily because it was applicable in theaters in the 1960s as well and eventually disappeared once multiplexes arrived.Learn more about Covenants, here
https://brainly.com/question/20989064
#SPJ4
How did andrew jackson respond to the supreme court's decision in worcester v. Georgia.
Answer:
Andrew Jackson declined to enforce the Supreme Court's decision, thus allowing states to enact further legislation damaging to the tribes. The U.S. government began forcing the Cherokee off their land in 1838.
Explanation:
Joe is the promoter of New Corporation (NC). He entered into various preincorporation contracts. NC was properly formed on January 1, 2006. As a result:A. Joe is no longer personally liable on those preincorporation contracts.B. NC is automatically liable on those preincorporation contracts.C. Joe is jointly and severally liable on preincorporation contracts.D. Joe is not liable because NC released him from personal liability.
The correct answer is, "Joe is jointly and severally liable on pre-incorporation contracts."
Contracts that are required to operate a business or incorporate are known as pre-incorporation contracts.
Pre-incorporation contracts are made by promoters, but at that point, the firm is only an artificial construct and doesn't actually exist. In essence, this means that it cannot be carried out at the time of incorporation.
A firm has no legal status prior to incorporation. As a result, it lacks the authority to sign a contract.
A pre-incorporation contract is not subject to suit or defense by the company. However, individuals who sign contracts for a future corporation may be held personally accountable for those agreements.
Pre-incorporation contracts are typically subject to personal liability for promoters.
According to the common law principle, if a company does not register or implement a pre-incorporation contract under the Specific Relief Act, the promoter will be held accountable for breach of contract.
To know more about promoter, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19903939
#SPJ4
iris was at fault in a car crash in which phil was injured. as they waited for the ambulance to arrive, a plane, which was part of a nearby air show, crashed into phil, significantly increasing his injuries. iris will not be liable for this second set of injuries because the plane crash was a cause. a. proximate b. legal c. foreseeable d. superseding
Iris will not be liable for this second set of injuries because the plane crash was superseding.
Iris won't be responsible for this second set of injuries based on the details in the question because the plane disaster was a superseding cause, according to my study on various liability law issues. This refers to an accident that occurs after an injury-causing event (the initial accident) has already taken place. In such a case, neither the injuries nor the second accident are the fault of the individual who caused the first one.
To supersede means to replace, especially because of a higher standard of value or legal standing, or to put something aside. An older law that has been repealed by a more recent statute is referred to as superseding the earlier legislation.
Learn more about Superseding, here
https://brainly.com/question/14398727
#SPJ4
Compare the similarities and differences of Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013)
and Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005) related to the 4th Amendment.
Answer:
Police took a drug-sniffing dog to Jardines’ front porch, where the dog gave a positive alert for narcotics. Based on the alert, the officers obtained a warrant for a search, which revealed marijuana plants; Jardines was charged with trafficking in cannabis. The Supreme Court of Florida approved the trial court’s decision to suppress the evidence, holding that the officers had engaged in a Fourth Amendment search unsupported by probable cause
What policy impacting college admissions did the u. S. Supreme court discuss this week.
The Supreme Court is poised to reject the racial admissions standards at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. Certainly, this regulation will have an impact on American college admissions.
The Supreme Court is discussing whether to uphold institutions' freedom to consider race when making college admissions choices in 2 cases, Student for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard & Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. After several failed attempts, Student for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an anti-affirmative action activist group led by Edward Blum, is now calling for the complete elimination of all racial admissions practises.
The result of these lawsuits may have an impact on workplace diversity initiatives as well as admission at hundreds of schools and universities throughout the nation, depending on the extent of the court's decision.
To know more about Lawsuits:
brainly.com/question/28521301
#SPJ4
Do you think men are more likely to engage in crime than woman?
according to messerschmidt, crime results from capitalist exploitation of , giving more opportunities to engage in crime.
Messerschmidt claims that capitalist exploitation of people results in crime by increasing criminal opportunities.
Messerschmidt's theory
According to Messerschmidt, in primitive hunting and gathering communities, "men-as-a-group" seized and abused women's labour at the beginning of time. According to Messerschmidt, patriarchy has its roots in reproductive relationships, which include the need for human socialisation and child upkeep. Marx and Engels, in his opinion, were fixated on class differences as the root of many social injustices. Messerschmidt asserts that patriarchy, not class stratification, is the primary cause of crime. He disregards data showing how far patriarchal connections are expansions of capitalism and imperialism, not merely unrelated trends.
He doesn't understand how capitalism's and socialism's unique structural differences affect patriarchy.
To know more about Messerschmidt:
brainly.com/question/9641894
#SPJ4
To what extent do the u. S. Constitution and its amendments protect against undue government infringement on essential liberties and from invidious discrimination?.
How is a senator elected ?.
Senators were elected by state legislatures rather than by popular vote until the 17th Amendment was ratified in 1913. Since then, the people of each state have elected them to six-year terms.
The terms of senators are staggered so that roughly one-third of the Senate is up for reelection every two years."The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof for six Years," states Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution. The framers hoped that by electing senators, state legislatures would strengthen their bonds with the federal government.Senators are elected directly by the general public. Legislation must be approved by both the House and Senate.
To know more about Senate leaders refer:
https://brainly.com/question/19270013
#SPJ4
what is the primary purpose of the preliminary hearing? to once again inform defendants of the specific charges against them to help ensure defendants will reappear when summoned by the court to give defendants the opportunity to challenge the legal basis for their detention to allow defendants to enter a plea
The primary purpose of the preliminary hearing is to give the defendant the opportunity to challenge the legal basis for detention. Hence, Option A is correct.
After the prosecutor has filed a criminal complaint, there may be a preliminary hearing, preliminary examination, preliminary inquiry, evidentiary hearing, or probable cause hearing to establish whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant a trial.
The goal of a preliminary hearing is for a judge to evaluate whether there is solid evidence that you have committed a crime and whether there is a good chance of that happening. In the state court system, preliminary hearings are infrequently permitted.
To know more about preliminary hearing: https://brainly.com/question/13623782
#SPJ4
The correct question is:
What is the primary purpose of the preliminary hearing?
Select one:
a. to give the defendant the opportunity to challenge the legal basis for detention
b. to once again inform the defendant of the specific charges against him or her
c. to allow the defendant to enter a plea
d. to help ensure reappearance of the accused
Discuss the use of GPS-enhanced electronic monitoring for probationers and parolees.
More than 4.5 million people in the United States are on probation or parole. This is approximately double the number of individuals who are now incarcerated.
GPS tracking is the way of the future in probation and parolees monitoring. It aids in the fight against overpopulation and reduces facility expenditures. Here are seven elements to consider when it comes to GPS probation monitoring's worldwide and local success.
Who are probationers?A probationer is someone who has been convicted of a crime but is out on probation rather than in jail. A probationer is someone who is still undergoing work training and is on trial.
Parole is a type of early release for a prisoner in which the prisoner agrees to specific behavioral requirements, such as checking in with their assigned parole officers, or else they would be rearrested and sent to jail.
Learn more about Parolees:
https://brainly.com/question/14462840
#SPJ1
the requirement that, in order to initiate a court case, parties must be able to show that they have a substantial stake in the outcome is called
The requirement that, in order to initiate a court case, parties must be able to show that they have a substantial stake in the outcome is called standing.
A court is any man or woman or group, frequently as a central authority organization, with the authority to adjudicate prison disputes between parties and perform the management of justice in civil, criminal, and administrative subjects in accordance with the rule of thumb of regulation.
A court docket is any professional tribunal presided over by using one or numerous judges in which criminal problems and claims are heard and determined. The U.S. system is composed of federal courts and country courts.
Learn more about court here:https://brainly.com/question/1302046
#SPJ4
what is the most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute? a. the prosecutor's belief in the defendant's guilt b. the reliability of victims c. whether sufficient evidence exists to gain a conviction d. whether or not the victim is willing to cooperate
The most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute is if there is sufficient evidence for conviction.
In a criminal trial, the prosecution is the party legally tasked with making its case against the defendant who is alleged to have broken the law. The prosecutor typically defends the state or the federal government in the case brought against the defendant.
Through its National Survey of Prosecutors, BJS has sponsored periodic national surveys or censuses of prosecutor offices since 1990. This program compiles information on the assets, guidelines, and procedures of state court systems' prosecution divisions.
Learn more about prosecute here:
https://brainly.com/question/27415132
#SPJ4
When an elected official engages in illegal or unethical acts, what is the impact on the democratic process?.
When an elected official engages in illegal or unethical acts citizens are less likely to vote or participate in civic duties.
About Civic duties
Civic duties ensure that the democratic principles contained in the Constitution as well as the Bill of Rights are upheld. "Responsibilities" encompass both optional choices and activities that are required by law.
Civic responsibilities in the US include things like filing taxes, attending class, and serving on juries if needed. Voting is viewed as a civic obligation even if it is important but not compulsory.
Civic responsibility can be exemplified through volunteering, taking part in politics, supporting causes, participating in nonpartisan activities, complying by state laws, or just being a good neighbour. To further social good, we must continue to collaborate with our organisations. If we want to benefit from a developed society, we must all agree to contribute our fair share.
To know more about unethical acts:
brainly.com/question/14883392
#SPJ4
laws enacted by legislative bodies at any level of government make up a source of law, which is generally referred to as . a. administrative law. b. case law. c. constitutional law. d. statutory law.
Statutory law- Laws enacted by federal, state, and local legislative bodies.
The term "written laws," typically passed by a legislative body, is "statutory law." Statutory laws are distinct from common law, or the law established by earlier court decisions, and regulatory or administrative laws imposed by executive agencies.
Statutes are also published and written down, or "codified." Statutory law typically takes effect on the day specified in the bill. A later legislative act or the determination that a statute is unconstitutional by a court with appropriate jurisdiction may result in its repeal.
To learn more about law refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28620883
#SPJ4
Which is the most accurate description of the executive office of the president?groups of advisers who help the chief of staffgroups of advisers who help the presidentgroups of advisers who oversee national securitygroups of advisers who oversee the economy.
The most accurate description of the office of the president is: Groups of advisers who help the president.
There is no president that is an expert in every field. In order to help his decision-making, a president usually relies on the expertise of other members of the office.
A president is a leader of an organization, corporation, network, club, alternate union, university or other institution.[1][2] the connection among a president and a major govt officer varies, relying at the shape of the precise agency. In a similar vein to a main running officer, the title of company president as a separate function (instead of being blended with a "C-suite" designation, consisting of "president and chief executive officer" or "president and chief working officer") is likewise loosely defined; the president is usually the legally recognized maximum rank of corporate officer, rating above the various vice presidents (inclusive of senior vice president and executive vp), but on its personal normally taken into consideration subordinate, in exercise, to the CEO.
Learn more about president here
https://brainly.com/question/2409724
#SPJ4
One preliminary test and one confirmatory test that can be used to analyze questioned document
Identification cards, contracts, wills, titles and deeds, seals, stamps, bank checks, handwritten correspondence, and machine-generated documents are examples of questioned documents.
Which of the following is an example of a questioned document?
A handwritten or typewritten text, for example, and a forged will both are illustrations of questioned documents. A 'questioned document,' according to forensic document examiners, is any material that contains marks, symbols, or signs intended to communicate a message.
Its preliminary test is to provide evidence about a suspicious document through scientific processes and methods. Blood cell identification under a microscope is one of the confirmatory tests.
Therefore, In forensic science, questioned document examination (QDE) refers to the examination of documents that may be challenged in court.
Learn more about the questioned document from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/9287836
#SPJ1
Question 2 of 20
What impact does interest have on the cost of the purchases you make when
using credit?
A. Interest has no impact because most credit cards do not charge
interest.
B. Interest can cause the overall cost of your purchases to increase.
C. Interest can cause the overall cost of your purchases to decrease.
OD. Interest has no impact because it is separate from the actual
purchase prices.
Option B is correct. The impact that the interest have on the cost of the purchases you make when using the credit is that the interest can cause the overall cost of your purchases to increase.
The meaning of interest
Interest is the fee paid for having the access to the borrowed funds. While the interest rate used to compute the interest is often reported as an annual percentage rate, the interest expense or revenue is sometimes expressed as a dollar figure (APR). Interest is the payment a lender or a financial institution makes in exchange for lending out money.
To know more about Interest:
brainly.com/question/13324776
#SPJ1
A is walking to his car in a parking garage. It is late at night and the garage is nearly empty. B approaches A. B is walking quickly toward A and yelling for A to stop. B reaches into his jacket and A sees what he believes to be a firearm. A draws his own firearm and shoots and kills B. It is later discovered that B possessed a fake handgun inside his jacket. Can A assert self-defense on these facts? What facts would support or not support such a claim?
Yes, A can assert self-defense. Among the five principles of self-defense, the factor that weighs heavily, in this case, is proportionality.
What is the principle of proportionality?The principle of proportionality indicates that to be eligible for a self-defense claim, the individual bringing the claim must have responded in a manner that is judged proportionate to the threat faced. In this case, the assailant retrieved what seemed to be a fire-arm.
Although it was later found to be a fake one, under such circumstances, it is impossible to rationalize such matters. In order words, it is not reasonable to expect A to have carried out an investigation on B's fire arm before asserting self-defense.
The principle of proportionality further states that a threat of non-lethal violence should not be countered with lethal self-defense. For example, it would be unacceptable to shoot or stab a potential assailant who obviously meant just to slap or shove the person claiming self-defense.
This would not be considered a proportionate reaction. Shoving or slapping the aggressor away, on the other hand, would be considered proportionate, and a claim of self-defense might perhaps be utilized to escape an assault conviction.
As earlier indicated, a cannot be held liable on the basis of reasonable expectation.
Learn more about the principles of self-defense:
https://brainly.com/question/14114226
#SPJ1
