Must be written as an equation

The measure of central angle in the "Sudokus" section in circle graph is 54 degrees.

From the relation the central angle for x% is given by,

Angle = (x/100)*360 degrees

Here it is given that a puzzle company polled and get a result that 15% of the respondents preferred Sudokus.

So if we plot this as Pie Chart then Central Angle for Sudoku section will be

= 15% of 360 degrees

= (15 / 100)*360 degrees

= (3 / 20)*360 degrees

= (3*18) degrees

= 54 degrees

Hence the central angle for "Sudoku" section in circle graph will be 54 degrees.

To know more central angle:

https://brainly.com/question/24151280

#SPJ1

A scatter plot would be the best choice to indicate whether there was a negative relationship between stock and bond returns.

A scatter plot is a type of graph used to display the relationship between two variables. It is also known as a scatter chart or scattergram. The graph consists of a series of points, each representing a single observation or measurement of two variables. The position of each point is determined by its values on the two variables. In a scatter plot, one variable is plotted on the x-axis and the other variable is plotted on the y-axis.

This type of graph would show the relationship between two variables, in this case stock and bond returns, on a single graph. It would provide a visual representation of any negative or positive correlation between the two variables.

Learn more about scatter plot, by the following link.

https://brainly.com/question/6592115

#SPJ4

The vectors v = 6i - 3j and w = i + 2j are orthogonal.

To determine if the vectors v and w are orthogonal, we need to find their dot product. If the dot product is 0, the vectors are orthogonal.

Here are the steps to find the dot product of v = 6i - 3j and w = i + 2j,

1. Identify the components of the vectors: v = (6, -3) and w = (1, 2)

2. Multiply the corresponding components of the vectors:

[tex](6 \times 1) + (-3 \times 2) = 6 - 6 [/tex]

3. Add the products: 6 - 6 = 0 Since the dot product is 0, the vectors v = 6i - 3j and w = i + 2j are orthogonal.

Learn more about vectors here,

https://brainly.com/question/27854247

#SPJ4

Correct question is " Are these vectors orthogonal? v = 6i - 3j and w = i+2j"

Answer:

Sqrt 49 = 7

Sqrt 136 = 11.6619037896906

Sqrt 181 = 13.45362404707371

Sqrt 100 = 10

Sqrt -64 = Not a real number (invalid input)

To calculate the probabilities of measuring spin up and down along the y and z axes for a given quantum state:

For the x-component:

The probability of measuring spin up along the x-axis (P_x↑) is given by (|α|^2 + |β|^2)/2.

The probability of measuring spin down along the x-axis (P_x↓) is given by (|α|^2 + |β|^2)/2.

For the y-component:

The probability of measuring spin up along the y-axis (P_y↑) is given by |α|^2.

The probability of measuring spin down along the y-axis (P_y↓) is given by |β|^2.

For the z-component:

The probability of measuring spin up along the z-axis (P_z↑) is given by |α|^2.

The probability of measuring spin down along the z-axis (P_z↓) is given by |β|^2.

Please note that these calculations require knowing the coefficients α and β of the quantum state in question.

Learn more about quantum state here: brainly.com/question/14576222

#SPJ11

The sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter (X) for a random sample of n = 16 rings is centered at the population mean of 16 cm. This means that on average, the sample mean diameter will be equal to the population mean. The standard deviation of the X distribution can be calculated using the formula σ/√n, where σ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size. In this case, the population standard deviation is given as 0.08 cm and the sample size is 16. Therefore, the standard deviation of the X distribution is 0.02 cm.

The sampling distribution is important in statistical analysis as it helps to determine the probability of obtaining a particular sample mean. It also allows us to estimate the true population mean and evaluate the effectiveness of statistical inferences. In this case, we can use the sampling distribution to determine the probability of obtaining a sample mean diameter that is different from the population mean of 16 cm. With a standard deviation of 0.02 cm, we can expect that the sample means will be relatively close to the population mean, with most falling within a few standard deviations from the mean.

To know more about statistical analysis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30591800

#SPJ11

Answer:

100 m

Step-by-step explanation:

because if 50 m in 1.0 a than 2.0 sec it's 100

The answer is (b) getting 50 twos after 600 separate rolls of a single die. The law of large numbers states that as the sample size increases, the sample mean approaches the population mean.

In other words, the more times you roll the die, the closer you should get to the expected value of each number on the die (which is 1/6 for a fair die). Option (a) of getting 200 threes and option (c) of getting 100 sixes are both too far away from the expected value to be consistent with the law of large numbers. Option (b) of getting 50 twos is closer to the expected value and thus consistent with the law of large numbers.

Therefore, the  law of large numbers predicts that over a large number of trials, the frequency of an event should approach its probability of occurrence. In this case, the probability of rolling a two on a fair die is 1/6, so getting 50 twos after 600 rolls is consistent with the law of large numbers.

To know more about probability  visit:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), lung cancer is the leading cause of smoking-attributable deaths in the United States.

The estimated annual number of smoking-attributable deaths in the United States is approximately 480,000. This includes deaths caused by lung cancer, as well as other smoking-related illnesses such as heart disease, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

The CDC reports that about 80% of all lung cancer deaths in the United States are caused by smoking. This means that approximately 136,000 of the 170,000 annual lung cancer deaths in the United States can be attributed to smoking.

To calculate the percentage of U.S. annual deaths attributable to smoking that are lung cancer deaths, we can use the following formula:

(Lung cancer deaths attributable to smoking / Total smoking-attributable deaths) x 100

Substituting the values from above, we get:

(136,000 / 480,000) x 100 = 28.3%

Therefore, approximately 28.3% of U.S. annual deaths attributable to smoking are lung cancer deaths.

Lung cancer is a serious health problem in the United States, and smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer. According to the CDC, smoking is responsible for about 80% of all lung cancer deaths in the United States. This means that smoking is responsible for a significant proportion of all cancer deaths in the country.

In addition to lung cancer, smoking is also a major cause of other types of cancer, including throat, mouth, esophageal, pancreatic, kidney, and bladder cancer. Smoking is also a leading cause of heart disease, stroke, and COPD.

The estimated annual number of smoking-attributable deaths in the United States is approximately 480,000. This represents a staggering toll on human life, and highlights the importance of effective smoking prevention and cessation efforts.

To reduce the number of smoking-attributable deaths, it is important to implement evidence-based tobacco control policies and programs. This includes measures such as increasing the price of tobacco products, implementing smoke-free laws, and providing access to effective smoking cessation treatments. By taking action to reduce smoking rates, we can help to prevent thousands of deaths each year and improve the health and well-being of millions of Americans.

To know more about percentage visit:

brainly.com/question/16797504

#SPJ11

True. Linear regression is a statistical technique that is commonly used to establish a relationship between two variables. It is based on the assumption that the relationship between the variables is linear, meaning that the data points will fall on or near a straight line.

However, this assumption can be a restriction in using linear regression, as real-world data may not always follow a linear relationship. In situations where the data is nonlinear, using linear regression can lead to inaccurate results and misleading predictions. Therefore, it is important to carefully evaluate the data and the assumptions before using linear regression, and to consider alternative statistical techniques if the data does not appear to follow a linear trend.

Learn more about Linear regression

https://brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ4

One employee incentive that is aimed at young parents is company-provided child care. So, correct option is B.

Many parents struggle to balance their work responsibilities with caring for their children, especially if they cannot afford childcare services. By offering on-site child care or subsidizing the cost of childcare, employers can help ease the burden for their employees who are parents.

This incentive can also help employees who are parents to remain focused and productive while at work, knowing that their children are being well-cared for nearby.

Additionally, this benefit may make the company more attractive to potential employees who are parents, and could improve employee retention rates.

Overall, offering child care assistance as an employee incentive is a way for employers to demonstrate their support for working parents and to help them balance the demands of work and family.

So, correct option is B.

To learn more about incentive click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30103714

#SPJ1

The maximum value of P is 20.68, which occurs when x = 1.67 and y = 1.07.

The optimal solution, we need to first graph the constraints and determine the feasible region.

The first constraint is 3x + 5y ≤ 12, which represents a line with a y-intercept of 2.4 and a slope of -3/5.

The second constraint is 6x + 2y ≤ 10, which represents a line with a y-intercept of 5 and a slope of -3.

Plotting these lines on a graph, we get:

The feasible region is the shaded region that satisfies both constraints and lies in the first quadrant.

Next, we need to evaluate the objective function at each corner point of the feasible region to find the maximum value of P.

The corner points are:

(0, 2.4)

(1.67, 1.07)

(1.43, 0)

(0, 0)

Evaluating P at each of these points, we get:

(0, 2.4):

P = 9.6

(1.67, 1.07):

P = 20.68

(1.43, 0):

P = 17.72

(0, 0):

P = 0

For similar questions on maximum

https://brainly.com/question/82347

#SPJ11

The statement that is  true is D. The p-value is less than or equal to 0.05.


If the results of a hypothesis test are statistically significant at the 5% level, it means that the probability of observing the results under the null hypothesis is less than or equal to 5%. This is equivalent to saying that the p-value is less than or equal to 0.05.

Option A is not necessarily true, as the results may or may not be statistically significant at the 10% level.

Option B is not necessarily true, as the results may or may not be statistically significant at the 1% level.

Option C is not true, as we know that the p-value is less than or equal to 0.05.

To know more about p value  click on below link :

https://brainly.com/question/30461126#

#SPJ11

Answer is 50%

The expected marginal cost is $8 per customer ($1,600 total cost / 200 customers). If Carol's actual total cost for serving 200 customers is 50% greater than $1,600, her actual total cost is $2,400 (1.5 times $1,600).

To find the actual marginal cost, we divide the actual total cost by the number of customers served: $2,400 / 200 = $12 per customer.

The actual marginal cost is $4 ($12 - $8) greater than the expected marginal cost. To find what percent greater this is, we divide $4 by the expected marginal cost of $8 and multiply by 100:

$4 / $8 = 0.5

0.5 x 100 = 50

Therefore, the actual marginal cost is 50% greater than the expected marginal cost.

Answer: 50

To know more about marginal cost calculations:

https://brainly.com/question/17230008

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of a success is 0.2, as there are 5 possible outcomes (0 to 4), and one of them is a success (3). Therefore, the probability of a success is 1/5, or 0.2.

The probability that 4 students arrive during a randomly selected office hour is 0.134, or about 13.4%.

To find the probability that 4 students arrive during a randomly selected office hour, we need to use the Poisson distribution formula.

The Poisson distribution is used to model the number of events that occur in a fixed interval of time or space.

The formula for the Poisson distribution is:

P(X = x) = (e^-λ * λ^x) / x!

Where X is the number of events, λ is the average number of events per interval, and e is the mathematical constant e.

In this case, λ = 2.5, since the average number of students who arrive during an office hour is 2.5. So, we can plug in λ and x = 4 into the formula:

P(X = 4) = (e^-2.5 * 2.5^4) / 4!

P(X = 4) = (0.082 * 39.0625) / 24

P(X = 4) = 0.134

To learn more about probability click here

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

36 units2

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the area of that particular figure, we need to divide it into 2 parts: part A and part B, respectively.

Since both of these parts are trapezium thus using the formula for their area is 1/2 x height x (sum of parallel sides).

We need to count the numbers on the graph to find the parallel sides.

So,

Area of A = 1/2 x h x (a+b) = 1/2 x 5 x (6+3) = 22.5 units2

Area of B = 1/2 x h x (a+b) = 1/2 x 3 x (4+5) = 13.5 units2

To find the area of the whole figure, we need to add the area of the two shapes.

So,

Area of the figure = Area of A + Area of B = 22.5 + 13.5 = 36 units2

Step-by-step explanation:

32 yards = 96 feet (1 yard = 3 feet, so 32 yards x 3 feet/yard = 96 feet)

14 feet = 168 inches (1 foot = 12 inches, so 14 feet x 12 inches/foot = 168 inches)

3 miles = 5,280 yards (1 mile = 1,760 yards, so 3 miles x 1,760 yards/mile = 5,280 yards)

The correct formula for this arithmetic sequence is f(n) =  -36 + (n-1)6. Thus, the answer is option A: f(n) = −36 + 6(n-1).

The common difference between any two consecutive terms in an arithmetic sequence is the same. In this sequence, we can observe that each term is obtained by adding 6 to the previous term. Therefore, the common difference is 6.

Now, we can use the formula for an arithmetic sequence to find the nth term of the sequence:

f(n) = a + (n-1)d

where a is the first term and d is the common difference.

In this case, the first term is -36 and the common difference is 6. Thus, the formula for the nth term of this arithmetic sequence is:

f(n) = -36 + (n-1)6

Therefore, the correct formula for this arithmetic sequence is f(n) =  -36 + (n-1)6. Thus, the answer is option A: f(n) = −36 + 6(n+1).

To learn more about sequence click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31509532

#SPJ1

We are 95% confident that the true mean number of books people read in the past year lies between 9.52 and 11.48 books.

What is mean?

In statistics, the mean (also known as the arithmetic mean or average) is a measure of central tendency that represents the sum of a set of numbers divided by the total number of numbers in the set.

To construct a confidence interval for the mean number of books people read, we can use the formula:

CI = x ± z*(s/√n)

Where:

x is the sample mean of the number of books read in the past year

s is the sample standard deviation of the number of books read in the past year

n is the sample size

z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (95% in this case)

Plugging in the values we have:

x = 10.5

s = 16.6

n = 1018

z = 1.96 (from the standard normal distribution table for a 95% confidence level)

CI = 10.5 ± 1.96*(16.6/√1018)

CI = 10.5 ± 0.98

CI = [9.52, 11.48]

We are 95% confident that the true mean number of books people read in the past year lies between 9.52 and 11.48 books. This means that if we were to repeat the survey many times, 95% of the intervals we construct would contain the true mean number of books read.

To learn more about mean from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ1

As a nurse, it is imperative to adhere to the medication dosage guidelines provided by the physician for patients. In this case, the patient's doctor has requested a change in the medication proportions to be mixed. Last week, the nurse was directed to mix 60 milligrams of medication a with 30 milligrams of medication b. However, this week, the physician has ordered the nurse to use only 15 milligrams of medication b.

To determine the appropriate dosage of medication a to be mixed this week, we must maintain the same proportion as last week but adjust for the change in the quantity of medication b.

First, we need to determine the ratio of medication a to medication b. We can do this by dividing the quantity of medication a by the quantity of medication b from last week's dosage.

60 mg / 30 mg = 2:1

This means that for every 2 milligrams of medication a, 1 milligram of medication b should be mixed.

Next, we can use this ratio to calculate the appropriate dosage of medication a for this week's prescription.

15 mg / 1 = x / 2

Where x represents the dosage of medication a.

Solving for x, we get:

x = 30 mg

Therefore, this week, the nurse should mix 30 milligrams of medication a with 15 milligrams of medication b for this patient.

To know more about Ratio visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ11

To determine the sequence of transformation matrices that map the shape on the left to the shape on the right, we need to analyze the changes in the shape's position, size, and orientation.

One possible sequence of transformation matrices is:

1. Translation matrix to move the shape to the right position.
2. Scaling matrix to adjust the size of the shape.
3. Rotation matrix to rotate the shape to the desired orientation.

The specific values of each transformation matrix will depend on the precise changes between the two shapes. For example, the translation matrix will have different values depending on how far the shape needs to be moved and in which direction. Similarly, the scaling matrix will depend on the degree of change in size required, while the rotation matrix will depend on the angle of rotation needed.

By applying these three transformation matrices in the correct order, we can map the shape on the left to the shape on the right.

To know more about sequence, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.1

Step-by-step explanation:

the probabilities have to add up to 100%

add all probabilities and subtract from 100 to find missing value

Based on the given information, we know that x must be 2 since it is the only even prime number. We also know that y must be either 11, 13, 17, or 19 since those are the only prime numbers between 10 and 20.

So, the sum of x and y can be 2 + 11 = 13, 2 + 13 = 15, 2 + 17 = 19, or 2 + 19 = 21.

Out of these four possible sums, only 13, 17, and 19 are prime numbers. Therefore, we can say that the sum of x and y may or may not be a prime number, depending on the specific values of x and y.

Learn more about prime number here:

https://brainly.com/question/30358834

#SPJ11

The answer is a. It should be right-skewed. The distribution of the salaries of the 25 CEOs would likely be right-skewed due to the presence of the outlier at 200 million, which would cause the tail to extend towards the right (higher values).

A skewed distribution occurs when one tail is longer than the other. Skewness defines the asymmetry of a distribution. Unlike the familiar normal distribution with its bell-shaped curve, these distributions are asymmetric. The two halves of the distribution are not mirror images because the data are not distributed equally on both sides of the distribution’s peak.

Right skewed distributions occur when the long tail is on the right side of the distribution. Analysts also refer to them as positively skewed. This condition occurs because probabilities taper off more slowly for higher values. Consequently, you’ll find extreme values far from the peak on the high end more frequently than on the low.

Visit here to learn more about  skewed distribution : https://brainly.com/question/1604092
#SPJ11

a. The probability density function of U1 = min(Y1, Y2) is 0 < u < 1

b. the value of E ( U 1 ) and V (U1) are 1/3 and 1/18 respectively.

a. To find the PDF of U1, we need to first find the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of U1. The CDF of U1 is defined as the probability that U1 is less than or equal to some value u.

P(U1 ≤ u) = P(min(Y1, Y2) ≤ u)

Since Y1 and Y2 are independent, we can write the above equation as:

P(min(Y1, Y2) ≤ u) = 1 - P(Y1 > u, Y2 > u)

Using the fact that Y1 and Y2 are uniformly distributed, we can compute the probability that they are both greater than u as:

P(Y1 > u, Y2 > u) = P(Y1 > u)P(Y2 > u) = (1 - u)(1 - u) = (1 - u)²

Therefore, the CDF of U1 is:

F(u) = 1 - (1 - u)², for 0 < u < 1.

To find the PDF of U1, we differentiate the CDF with respect to u:

f(u) = dF(u)/du = 2(1 - u), for 0 < u < 1.

Therefore, the PDF of U1 is:

f(u) = 2(1 - u), for 0 < u < 1.

b. The expected value of U1 is given by:

E(U1) = ∫ u*f(u) du, for 0 < u < 1.

Substituting the PDF of U1 into the above equation and integrating, we get:

E(U1) = ∫ u*2(1 - u) du, for 0 < u < 1.

E(U1) = [u² - (2/3)u³] from 0 to 1.

E(U1) = 1/3.

Therefore, the expected value of U1 is 1/3.

The variance of U1 is given by:

V(U1) = E(U1²) - [E(U1)]².

To find E(U1²), we use the formula:

E(U1²) = ∫ u²*f(u) du, for 0 < u < 1.

Substituting the PDF of U1 into the above equation and integrating, we get:

E(U1²) = ∫ u²*2(1 - u) du, for 0 < u < 1.

E(U1²) = [u³ - (3/4)u⁴] from 0 to 1.

E(U1²) = 1/2.

Therefore, V(U1) = E(U1²) - [E(U1)]² = (1/2) - (1/3)² = 1/18.

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

LENGTHS: P, Q, R

AREAS: A, B

CODE: PLRAQB

The dimensions of the square pasture would be approximately 565.7 meters by 565.7 meters.

Let's assume the length of the rectangular pasture along the river is x meters. Since no fencing is needed along the river, only three sides of the pasture will require fencing. Therefore, the perimeter of the pasture, which represents the amount of fencing required, will be equal to 2x + y meters.

The area of the rectangular pasture is given as 320,000 square meters, so we have the equation xy = 320,000.

To minimize the amount of fencing, we need to minimize the perimeter. The perimeter equation can be rewritten as P = 2x + (320,000/x).

To find the minimum value of P, we can take the derivative of P with respect to x and set it equal to zero. By solving the resulting equation, we find that x ≈ 565.7 meters.

Substituting this value of x into the area equation xy = 320,000, we can solve for y, which also turns out to be approximately 565.7 meters.

Therefore, the dimensions that require the least amount of fencing are approximately 565.7 meters by 565.7 meters, forming a square-shaped pasture.

Learn more about dimensions:

brainly.com/question/31493788

#SPJ11

Using the volume of a cylinder the amount of broth used is 565 cm³

The volume of a cylinder is given by V = πr²h where

Now, since a brand new filled can of chicken broth is 9 cm tall and has a radius of 6 cm. Mishka uses some of the broth to cook and now the broth left in the can is 4 cm high.

To determine how much broth did Mishka use, we proceed as follows.

We know that the can is a cylinder so its volume is  V = πr²h where

Now, the volume of broth used is the difference in height between the height of the cyliner and the height of the amount of broth left.

So, V = πr²(H - h) where

Given that

Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have that

V = πr²(H - h)

V = π(6 cm)²(9 cm - 4 cm)

= π(36 cm²)(5 cm)

= 180π cm³

= 565.4 cm³

≅ 565 cm³

So, the amount used is 565 cm³

Learn more about volume of cylinder here:

https://brainly.com/question/27535498

#SPJ1