Crimea is the russian controlled territory formally annexed from ukraine in 2014 where a recent bridge attack was considered a strategic lose for president vladimir putin.
Russia invaded and then seized control of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in March and February 2014. This incident, which was a component of the larger Russo-Ukrainian War, happened following the Revolution of Dignity.
A massive explosion appeared to deal a shocking blow early on Saturday to a representation of President Vladimir Putin's plans to dominate Ukraine by ripping across the Crimean Bridge, the vital link connecting mainland Russia and Crimea.
To know more about Crimea:
brainly.com/question/8593398
#SPJ4
Recreation cannot serve as a mechanism for controlling the behavior of inmates by granting or denying access to pleasurable pursuits.
This claim is untrue. By allowing or denying access to enjoyable activities, recreation can act as a tool for behavior management of prisoners.
What are leisure activities, and what are the advantages?Recreational activities are supposed to assist manage worry and stress, enhance one's health by maintaining a body active, and recover social skills that were impaired by lockdowns caused by the global pandemic.
What impact do leisure programs have on prisoners' lives?Recreational programs can support physical fitness, social growth, and stress reduction. These initiatives help prisoners decompress from prison life while also encouraging good physical, mental, and interpersonal skills.
Why are leisure activities crucial?Participants receive educational benefit from these activities. They pick up skills which they can use in the activity and in their daily life. Recreational activities teach vital skills that might assist one's mental health, including communication, teamwork, problem solving, and coping.
Learn more about Recreational activities: https://brainly.com/question/6154
#SPJ4
How did the government decide which people received the largest land grants in texas?.
The government chose the Texans who would get the largest land grants because it wished to honour those who had lived in the state before the Texas Revolution.
The Texas Constitution of 1836 granted some acres of land to each head of a family residing in Texas on March 4, 1836, absent any African Americans or Native Americans.The same amount of land provided to the early colonists in a first class headright was also given to soldiers that arrived in Texas. The fledgling Republic of Texas's government implemented a liberal policy of dispersing the public domain to incoming settlers in order to create a tax base and promote settlement.
To know more about Texas Revolution:
brainly.com/question/11739648
#SPJ4
Young African-Americans criticized the traditional civil rights organizations for paying too much attention to
A) the burden of poverty.
B) informal segregation.
C) legal segregation.
D) police harassment.
Young African-Americans criticized the traditional civil rights organizations for paying too much attention to legal segregation. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.
What is legal segregation?People have historically been segregated based on their race, gender, or both. Segregation denotes the physical segregation of individuals in daily life, the workplace, and the exercise of civil rights. The Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I), which was published on May 17, 1954, that racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment even if it was asserted that the services provided there were of the "same quality."
While the Brown I decision did not outline or identify a specific strategy for eliminating racial segregation in schools, the Brown II decision from the Supreme Court in 1955 required states to desegregate "with all deliberate haste."
Learn more about legal segregation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8680000
#SPJ1
Which law passed under the articles of confederation allowed for the creation of new states and the expansion of the u. S. ?.
Answer: Northwest Ordinance of 1787
Explanation:
Which are characteristics of nongovernmental organizations Brainly?.
NGOs were originally referred to as such in Article 71 of the 1945 Charter of the newly established United Nations.
While NGOs do not have a set or official definition, they are typically thought of as nonprofit organizations that are unaffected by political influence (although they may receive government funding). The distinction between nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) is minimal, as one can infer from the fundamental definition above. However, nonprofit organizations located in the United States are not frequently referred to as "NGOs." Although some nations identify their own civil society organizations as NGOs, the term "NGO" is typically only applied to organizations that operate on a global scale.
NGOs engage in a variety of activities, such as human rights, social, and environmental advocacy.
Learn more about NGOs here: https://brainly.com/question/12650984
#SPJ4
Approximately what percentage of police agencies require a minimum of a four-year degree?.
Answer: One percent
Explanation: Currently, approximately one percent of local police departments in America require their officers to hold four-year degrees.
Approximately, one percent of agencies require a minimum of a four-year degree.
What is police agencies?
The term police agencies refer to based on the law enforcement agency. The police agencies was the required to the main motive to the safety of the people and also control the law and the crime. The police are the main role to track the criminal.
The educational requirements to become a police officer are the generate the employment on the one percent to the four-year degree. There were the agencies may hire an individual and the skill based person. The police agency was the also required the candidate degree.
As a result, the approximately, one percent of agencies require a minimum of a four-year degree.
Learn more about on police agencies, here;
https://brainly.com/question/5480665
#SPJ2
What section of the texas education code chapter 37. 0832 requires a school district to establish procedures for students to anonymously report an incident of bullying?.
Section 37.0832c of the TEC Code forbids retaliation against witnesses who report a bullying occurrence.
This assertion is accurate. is severe, persistent, Bullying and pervasive enough to place a student in a hostile, threatening, or abusive learning environment; has the potential to cause physical harm to a student, damage to a student's property, or places a student in a situation where they have a reasonable fear of being physically hurt or having their property damaged. Bullying is a behavior that interferes with a student's education or seriously disrupts a school's operation and takes advantage of a power imbalance between the student offender and the student victim through written, verbal, or physical expression.
Learn more about bullying hear:
brainly.com/question/28166480
#SPJ4
which of the following terms represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause? question 35 options: a) actual cause b) proximate cause c) establishment cause d) negligent cause e) injurious cause
Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
https://brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
Is it possible that a third party could replace one of the major parties?
What would have to happen for us to see a major shift in the party-in-the-electorate?
A political party faces a number of challenges, including a lack of internal democracy, dynamic succession, funding, and muscle power. Internal democracy is lacking due to the concentration of power in the hands of a few ministers, which causes internal conflicts.
What is the party in the electorate?Individuals who perceive themselves as party members constitute the party in the electorate; many voters have a party identification that guides and influences their votes.
The first challenge is a lack of internal democracy within political parties. Across the globe, there is a growing concentration of power in the hands of a few or just one leader. Ordinary members of the party do not receive adequate information about what occurs within the party.
Learn more about the party in the electorate here:
https://brainly.com/question/6209361
#SPJ1
Which rights for citizens did the english bill of rights support? select three options.
The English Bill of Rights supported the following civil liberties for citizens:
Defense against harsh penalty Possession of firearmsThe option of a jury trial Justification:These three points support citizens with fair treatment and provide insurance for a decent standard of living. The first protects citizens from all forms of torture and mistreatment, the second permits gun ownership with the appropriate restrictions for regular citizens, and the third offers citizens with legal assistance if they are subjected to a procedure that must uphold all general rights.
In order to enshrine the rights of American citizens, the bill of rights was drafted. Additionally, it was done to prevent the government from encroaching on citizens' freedoms.
To know more about bill of rights: https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
What is the difference between the due process protections in the fifth amendment and the fourteenth.
A court oversees 5th Amendment's concept of due process. As per 14th Amendment, citizens have right to restrict government's ability to meddle in their personal matters.
Personal matters such as their right to free speech or their ability to own property, unless doing so would violate the law. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment demands equal protection from the federal government. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment mandates that states implement equal protection.
The Fifth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which exclusively limits the federal government, and the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause are identical. No one may be "deprived of life, freedom, or possessions sans due process of law," according to the constitution. "Due process" typically refers to impartial procedures.
To know more about Due Process Clause:
brainly.com/question/10386265
#SPJ4
What was Henry Ford's motivation?.
Ford, a farm kid, was first driven by a desire to ease farmers' burdens and assist them in transporting goods to markets. His Ford Motor Company unveiled the Model T, a mass-market automobile, in 1908.
What or who inspired Henry Ford?Ford is credited with drawing inspiration from the Chicago meatpacking industry's "disassembly" line for animals. Ford was able to prosper thanks to these production methods that further reduced unit production costs. Many employees left their jobs as a result of these trends toward monotonous, machine-like employment.
What did Henry Ford want most of all?A motor car for the great multitude was Henry Ford's stated objective for the Ford Motor Company in 1907, when cars were still expensive, specialized machines.
To know more about Ford's motivation visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12788544
#SPJ4
Which rulings can a judge in a federal appeals court make? choose all answers that are correct.
The rulings that a judge in a federal appeals court can make include:
(a). To uphold the result of the trial in the lower district court.
(b). To overturn the verdict of the trial in the lower district court.
(c). To require the Supreme Court to decide the case.
It should be noted that a judge in a federal appeals court can uphold the result of the trial in the lower district court. This occurs when one of the parties involved is not happy with the judgment.
Also, the judge can overturn the verdict of the trial in the lower district court and can require the Supreme Court to decide the case.
Learn more about federal here
https://brainly.com/question/220248
#SPJ4
Which rulings can a judge in a federal appeals court make?
2. List all the facts relevant to deciding whether
Damms had taken enough steps to attempt
to murder Marjory Damms according to the
Wisconsin statute. In the case of state v. damms
Actors who attempt to conduct crimes that they plan to do are nonetheless guilty of the crime even
If it is impossible and the actor is unaware of it.
A clear action taken with the intention of committing a crime suffices to qualify.
Since the actor knows he did all required to ensure the planned crime was committed, he cannot avoid punishment due to the fortunate situation that the desired outcome was unattainable due to a fact he was not aware of to murder Marjory Damms.
Defendant was found guilty of attempting to murder someone. In his appeal, the defendant maintained that because the pistol was empty, it was impossible for him to have committed the murder, and as a result, he was not guilty of the crime.
According to the defendant, the statutory phrase "save for the involvement of some other extraneous circumstance" in Wis. Stat. 939.32(2) applied to the inability of achievement caused by the pistol not being loaded. Additionally, the defendant claimed that there wasn't enough evidence to find him guilty of attempted murder.
To know more about murder visit:https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ9
At the start of his term, the president nominated neil gorsuch to be a supreme court justice. Which constitutionally authorized power was he exercising in this case?.
The president appointed Neil Gorsuch to the supreme court as a justice at the commencement of his term. The president was acting within the bounds of his constitutionally given jurisdiction to nominate and appoint different political offices when he made this appointment.
The United States President has the power to nominate as well as appoint public officials, which would include federal judges of the United States Supreme Court, with both the confirmation (advice and consent) of the United States Senate under the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S Constitution. This clause, often known as the Appointments Clause, serves as an example of the checks and balances that are built into the Constitution. While the president does have full power to nominate and appoint, the Senate has the sole authority to accept or reject a presidential candidacy.
To know more about Jurisdiction:
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
if tyler's case would have been tried after 2005, judge gilbert could have deviated from the life sentence and given a less punishment. this is called:
If Tyler's case would have been tried after 2005, judge gilbert could have deviated from the life sentence and given less punishment. This is called departure.
When you have a minor deviated septum, you may have slight symptoms or no signs at all. If your deviated septum is greater extreme, it may have an effect on your breathing, motivate headaches, or cause infections.
An untreated deviated septum can reason obstructive sleep apnea. When left untreated, sleep apnea can cause excessive blood pressure, stroke, heart failure, heart attacks, diabetes, depression, worsening of ADHD, and complications.
Maximum of the time, it takes numerous weeks for the nostril to heal completely. If surgeons finished extensive reconstructive surgery, it could be six months or greater before the swelling absolutely goes away. During this time, your physician may screen your recovery at some stage in periodic examinations.
Learn more about deviated here https://brainly.com/question/24298037
#SPJ4
Describe the parts of the medieval court system which are still used in our american court system today.
The American legal system still uses a judge and jury, two components of the medieval court system.
The federal and state branches of the American judiciary are set up differently. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the Republic, with input from the Federal Senate and the National Bar Association, rather than elected, which is how they are chosen in most states. The concept of judges has been around since the Middle Ages.
A judge-led jury in the US is also used to present civil and criminal cases to potential jurors. Additionally, since the Middle Ages, this trait has been prevalent.
The judge serves as the law's ultimate arbiter. It is the judge's responsibility to state the law in a positive manner. When it comes to the presentation of evidence by counsel during a trial, the judge acts as an impartial "umpire." Additionally, the judge must decide on admissibility and instruct the jury on how to apply the law. The judge is also responsible for maintaining discipline in the courtroom. On rare occasions, the judge may also serve as the fact-finder if all parties agree. A "bench trial" is what this is. With the Senate's "advice and consent," the President appoints judges to federal courts. The electorate chooses a large number of state court judges.In most trials, the facts are decided by the jury, a group of local citizens. The jury will receive legal instructions from the judge, and in order to reach a verdict, the members will evaluate the facts as they see them in the context of the legal guidelines.Learn more about Jury, here
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ4
Match authority levels and tasks in comparing and contrasting private security with law enforcement agencies.
Arrests, detective work, major crimes of violence, burglaries, auto theft
More easily deals with computer crime, intellectual property crime, pirating of music
Arrests, detective work, major crimes of violence, burglaries, auto theft
Assists with gangs and neighborhood crime, banking, patrolling educational institutions, gaming, construction fraud
The Law enforcement agencies are appointed by the government and hence work in cases which involve tasks of all nature. Private security works rather specifically for the individual who hires their services.
Law enforcement agencies are entrusted with tasks which include arrests, detective work, major crimes of violence, burglaries, auto theft, intellectual property crime, pirating of music etc.
Whereas, Private security works on tasks which include detective work, auto theft, Assisting with gangs and neighborhood crime, banking, patrolling educational institutions, gaming, construction fraud.
Few are common tasks of both like detective work, patrolling etc but it can be very well said that law enforcement agencies work in almost all areas on which private security works.
To know more about Law enforcement:
brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ1
a police officer stops a car for speeding and conducts a search of the trunk without a warrant or consent from the owner or operator. during the search, the officer, however, finds three pounds of marijuana worth approximately, $5,000 in cash, and several stolen guns. based on the exclusionary rule, what are the courts likely to do with the evidence in this case?
Based on the exclusionary rule, The courts will likely exclude the evidence from court.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle based on constitutional law in the United States that forbids the use of evidence gathered or examined in defiance of the defendant's constitutional rights in a court of law.
The exclusionary rule is used by American courts to prevent police officers and other government employees from violating citizens' constitutional rights. The general norm is that courts will reject evidence that the government obtains by improper means, frequently an illegal search or seizure.
The exclusionary rule typically relates to the suppression of tangible evidence that the police seize in violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment right to be free from arbitrary search and seizure (such as a murder weapon, stolen property, or illegal substances).
To know more about exclusionary rule: https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ4
Justice rehnquist said the decision left the abortion area of the law more confused than it found it. What do you think he meant by that statement?.
Justice Rehnquist intended for his statement to convey how the court's ruling will alter and complicate the application of the statute governing the first-trimester abortions.
Justice Rehnquist questioned the scope and the significance of the law and questioned whether it was really that important to prevent the state from getting involved in the matters of the abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy after the court based its argument on the fundamental constitutional right to privacy or liberty. Justice Rehnquist thought that using the law would become more difficult as a result of the court's ruling in the matter.
To know more about Abortions:
https://brainly.com/question/28459534
#SPJ4
if the court ruled in norberto's favor, could dhani be personally liable for the amount of the judgment?
If the court ruled in Norberto's favor, yes dhani be personally liable for the amount of the judgment.
A court is any legitimate tribunal presided over with the aid of one or numerous judges wherein prison troubles and claims are heard and determined. The U.S. device includes federal courts and country courts.
Courtship is the actual way of wooing a person with the aid of letting them see who you virtually are as they do the same for you. If executed efficiently, courtship can reason the captivating and loving dating you will be in search of, and it can even save you from sudden effects and emotional turmoil.
Learn more about court here: https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
the rule that allows that an individual may be prosecuted for an offense in both a state and a federal court is known as the
Dual Sovereignty is the legal principle that permits a person to face criminal charges in both state and federal courts.
When a crime is committed that has an effect on two jurisdictions, distinct sovereignties, such as separate states, are permitted to pursue the same case in criminal court. This is known as the dual sovereignty doctrine. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prevents people from facing multiple charges for the same offense, is overruled by this doctrine.
To know more about federal courts
brainly.com/question/18574024
#SPJ4
When the president grants a pardon to someone convicted of a federal crime, this is an example of using one of their ________ powers.
When the president grants a pardon to someone convicted of a federal crime, this is an example of using one of their legislative powers.
What is crime?The term crime refers to the illegal activity. The crime is not allow to the country, if any person is commit the crime are go the jail. The legal punishable by the state in case of crime. The punishment is set according to the different crime. For example a person is harm another person property.
The president appoints judges for the federal courts with the Senate's advice and consent. In Article I of the Constitution, which establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the Senate is mentioned. The legislative branch is in charge of formulating laws and enacting legislation.
As a result, the president grants a pardon to someone convicted of a federal crime, this is an example of using one of their legislative powers.
Learn more about on crime, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ2
The condemnation of property is not an involuntary conversion, since it is done pursuant to a government decree. True False
Answer: False.
Explanation:
Political Canvassing Activities
Answering phone calls
.
.
.
Going door-to-door with party materials
Working booths at local festivals
. ?
Which item best completes the chart?
A. Raising money for campaigns
B. Registering voters
C. Joining political parties
D. Contributing to party newsletters
Answer: d
Contributing to party newsletters
Explanation:
what are some of the incentives that encourage the use of plea bargains?
According to ti American Law, the incentives that encourage the use of plea bargains include prosecutors can avoid trials.
What is Plea Bargain?Plea Bargain is a term that is used to describe the practice of negotiating an agreement in law.
The Plea Bargain usually occurred between the prosecution and the defense whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense.
Usually, various incentives encourage the use of plea bargains, these incentives can be regarded as the advantages of plea margins, and my lawyers have used them to assist their clients.
The advantage of a plea bargainthere is no risk of complete loss at trial. plea bargains may represent a possible way for the attorneys to reduce their potential losses through settling.Plea bargaining can also be a means for the courts to preserve scarce resources.plea bargains include prosecutors can avoid trials.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there various benefits or incentives to use of plea bargain.
Learn more about Plea Bargain here: https://brainly.com/question/8436096
#SPJ1
The development of new political theories in the enlightenment, such as those of locke and rousseau, can be explained as a reaction to.
The development of new political theories in the enlightenment, such as those of Locke and Rousseau, can be explained as a reaction to the growth of absolutist forms of government across much of Europe.
Development is the process of growth, progress, positive change or adding physical, economic, environmental, social and demographic components. All developments require approval, but because each development has a different level of impact, there are three types of development:There are three types of development: compliance; • price; and • Discrepancies. Each development type has its own evaluation process. Besides creating better jobs, development is important to the country because it improves business and trade.
Learn more about development here: https://brainly.com/question/17019717
#SPJ4
What is debate and its advantages?.
For pupils of all abilities, debating is a useful activity. Debate instills abilities that are beneficial for various academic endeavors as well as life in general. Debaters, most obviously, develop their public speaking and argumentation skills.
The advantages of debate go beyond the skills developed when students are speaking; the competition itself teaches them research and critical-thinking techniques. "The measure of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to keep two contradictory concepts in mind at the same time and still have the ability to operate," stated F. Scott Fitzgerald once. By requiring pupils to consider opposing viewpoints, debate both tests and develops this skill. Debaters exercise their analytical muscles by learning to identify the gaps in their adversaries' claims.
learn more about debate here:
https://brainly.com/question/28240337
#SPJ4
What was Eugene Debs accused of committing in 1918?.
Debs was found guilty in 1918 of giving a speech in Canton, Ohio, that "caused and incited and attempted to cause and incite insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, and refusal of duty in the military and naval forces of the United States and with intent so to do [he] delivered, to an assembly of people, a public speech." Debs was sentenced to life in prison for the crime.
In 1918, what transpired with Eugene V. Debs?
Debs was known for his ability to speak in public, and in 1918, he was arrested again for giving a speech in which he opposed American participation in World War I.He was found guilty and given a ten-year prison term under the 1918 Sedition Act.In December 1921, President Warren G. Harding commuted his sentence.
Learn more about public speech here:
https://brainly.com/question/8101368
#SPJ4
if a grand jury is not used, the prosecutor files a(n) ________ against the accused.
In the absence of a grand jury, the prosecutors submit information against the defendant.
What is information?Information is an ambiguous concept that describes anything with the ability to inform. Information relates to the interpretation of what can be felt at its most basic level.
Any natural activity that is not entirely random and any discernible pattern in any media can both be considered to be transmitting some level of information.
Other occurrences and artifacts, including analog signals, poems, photographs, melodies or other sounds, and currents, use more continuous forms of communication to convey information than digital signals and other data.
Learn more about information, from:
brainly.com/question/13629038
#SPJ1
