Answer:
Explanation:
Answer: d. The police are granted immunity in civil cases. This means that in many cases, the police cannot be held legally responsible for their actions, which makes it difficult to assess the true nature of lawsuits against them. Because they are granted immunity, it can be difficult to determine the circumstances that lead to a lawsuit and the outcome of the case. This can make it difficult to assess the true nature of the lawsuit and the extent of any damages that may have been awarded.
Question 17 of 25
Which statement describes a feature of the presidential system?
A. Power is shared between the national and regional levels.
OB. The head of state is also the head of government.
C. The executive branch is separate from the legislative branch.
D. Voters do not choose the president directly.
Answer: C. The executive branch is separate from the legislative branch.
Explanation:
A presidential system is a system of government in which the executive branch is separate from the legislative branch. This means that the president, who is the head of the executive branch, is independent from the legislature, which is made up of representatives elected by the people. The president is elected separately from the legislature, and he or she has the power to veto or sign into law bills passed by the legislature. This separation of powers helps to ensure that no single branch of government becomes too powerful and helps to promote checks and balances within the government.
Teenagers when they should stop drinking.
A. tend to know
B. have difficulty knowing
C. ignore
Answer:
Explanation:
the advice
Teenagers tend to know when they should stop drinking, but unfortunately, they often have difficulty actually following through on that knowledge. It is important for parents, teachers, and other adults to provide guidance and advice to teenagers regarding the risks associated with drinking alcohol, as well as the legal ramifications of underage drinking. Many teens will ignore this advice, but providing it can help to ensure that they make educated decisions. Additionally, providing a safe and supportive environment for teenagers to talk about their experiences with alcohol and other substances can help them to understand the potential consequences in a way that is more relevant to their own lives.
When determining what should be considered criminal behavior, the pluralist perspective recognize the importance of diversity. Because of society diversity, some behavior may spark debate. How is that debate resolved?
Answer:
The pluralist perspective recognizes that different groups in society may have different perspectives on what should be considered criminal behavior. This can lead to debate and disagreement over what actions should be criminalized and what actions should not be.
One way that this debate is resolved is through the democratic process. In a democratic society, laws and criminal codes are created and amended through the participation of citizens and their elected representatives. This allows for different perspectives and opinions to be heard and considered in the law-making process.
Another way that debate is resolved is through the court system. The court system is responsible for interpreting and applying criminal laws and codes. In cases where there is a disagreement about the interpretation or application of a law, the court system can provide clarification and guidance. For example, when there is disagreement about the meaning of the term "criminal behavior", courts may interpret the law in a way that takes into account the diversity of society and the different perspectives that exist.
Additionally, the debate can be resolved through the use of discretion by law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and judges. Discretion refers to the ability of these actors to make decisions about how to enforce the law in a particular situation. They can take into account the specific circumstances of a case and the diverse perspectives of different groups in society when deciding how to proceed.
Overall, resolving debate over criminal behavior in a pluralist society may involve a combination of these approaches, including democratic process, court interpretation and discretion. It is important to note that the process of resolving debate over criminal behavior is ongoing, as society's values and perspectives continue to evolve over time.
4. “For the people who are profiled, the indignity is real. In essence, profiling requires them to establish their legitimacy to the satisfaction of state officials. The cumulative effect on individuals of bearing this burden…(undermines) fundamental principles of equal dignity and worth and respect for the presumption of innocence.”
Write a paragraph giving your opinion on this statement. Back up your opinion/argument with your findings in the readings and videos found in the module.
In writing Paragraphs you must consider the structure of the Paragraphs, Paragraphs contain three main parts:
a topic sentence supporting sentences a concluding sentence.What are the Paragraphs?I agree with the statement that profiling individuals based on their race or ethnicity undermine principles of equal dignity and worth.
Profiling creates a situation in which individuals are viewed with suspicion and treated differently based on their perceived characteristics, rather than being treated as individuals with the same rights and protections. This is a violation of the principle of equal protection under the law, as well as the presumption of innocence.
Additionally, profiling can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy in which individuals who are targeted by law enforcement are more likely to be involved in criminal activity, as they are more likely to be searched, arrested, and charged with crimes.
This can further reinforce the idea that certain groups are more likely to be involved in criminal activity, and perpetuate discrimination and bias within the criminal justice system.
Read more about Paragraphs
https://brainly.com/question/24460908
#SPJ1
In the film crips and blood-made in America the film shows a quick series of yearbook-style photos of young children, as well as other pictures of children on the streets of South Los Angeles. What impact does seeing these photos have on you?
Answer:
It brings the realization that all of the gang members were children at one point.
Explanation:
People sometimes forget that gang members started out just like the rest of us. Some came from decent homes and families, others from poverty and lack of parental guidance. Something caused them to join, it may have been friends, the location of their homes, or even just wanting to be a part of something. Looking at the photos, it makes you realize what could have been, some could even remind you of someone you know.
In this exercise you play the role of a police officer for one day. Long Beach Police officers get up to 30 calls to action in a single 12 -hour shift. As we have discussed, police are first-responders and often find themselves in situations that they do not have the full story of when they arrive. This assignment will have you write out what you think the best-case and worst-case outcomes for four typical calls. Remember, your job is to protect and serve the public and arrive home safely to your family at the end of your shift. In each of these scenarios:
A. Imagine and write about the thoughts that would be going through your mind as you travel to the location
B. Imagine and write about the thoughts that would be going through your mid as you survey the situation
C. Imagine and write about the thoughts that would be going through your mind as you begin your response and describe what that response would be
D. Describe a best-case scenario for how this all might work out
E. Describe a worst-case scenario for how this all might work out
Scenario 1: You are working the night shift and get a call saying that there is a group of 6-10 males congregating in the ally. The caller feared that there were drug deals going on. It is nearly 3:00 in the morning when you approach.
Scenario 2: You are waiting at a red light and the minivan next you all of a sudden crosses the intersection before the light turns green. You turn on your lights and use the intercom to tell the van to pull over. You make out that there are at least 5 people in the van, all adults. You run the plate and dispatch tells you that the owner of the vehicle has a warrant out for his arrest.
Scenario 3: About 30 minutes after the local high school lets out you get a call stating that there are some individuals fighting in the street several blocks down the road from the school. You approach and see several males fighting in the street. You also see dozens of students filming the fight on their cell phones.
Scenario 4: Just before your shift ends, you receive a call that there is a pedestrian on the corner who is yelling, threating, cussing at and harassing any and all people who try to walk down the sidewalk. You arrive at the scene and the person looks unclean and unkept, has a brown paper bag in his hand and that person immediately begins to cuss at you.
Research on the effects of BWCs on officer and civilian actions has been synthesized in this Campbell systematic review.
What is the purpose of assignment statement ?A variable, field, variable, or element's current value is set with an assignment statement. The assignment operator, an expression, and an assignment target are all included in the statement. The expression is assessed when the phrase is run, and the outcome is then saved in the target. During the course of a programme, a variable may hold a variety of values thanks to assignment statements. An assignment statement can also be understood as storing a value in the memory address indicated by a variable name. In a program, an assign statement is used to assign a value to a variable by name.
To know more about assignment statement visit:
brainly.com/question/25875756
#SPJ1
Josue was pulled over for an illegal right-hand turn. After the police officers spoke with Josue, they believed they had reasonable suspicion that a crime
was about to take place. Consequently, Josue was asked to exit the vehicle to be patted down for weapons. Which police procedure did the officers
follow in this situation?
A. officer preservation
B.
stop and frisk
C. probable cause searching
traffic searching
D.
The procedure that the police officers used in the situation, to ask Josue to exit the vehicle was C. probable cause searching
What is probable cause ?Probable cause is a legal standard that must be met before law enforcement officers can make an arrest, conduct a search, or take other similar actions. It refers to a level of suspicion that is based on facts and circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed, or that certain evidence of a crime will be found in a specific place.
This standard is used to protect citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, and is an essential element of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
This is therefore what the police officers used in asking Josue to exit the vehicle for searching.
Find out more on probable cause at https://brainly.com/question/28399684
#SPJ1
have the right-of-way in emergency situations.
A. The fastest vehicles
B. Emergency vehicles
C. Family members
How effective have the strategies been in marine plastic pollution?
The strategies been used in marine plastic pollution was effective in the sense that they reduce Waste, Shop wisely and reduce Vehicle Pollution.
What are the methods for managing plastic waste?It has been determined that among the six methods for managing plastic trash (landfills, recycling, pyrolysis, liquefaction, road construction and tar manufacture, and concrete production), these two are the most successful.
Substituting less hazardous materials for raw resources. Process modification: modifying the production procedure to increase productivity and decrease the use of hazardous materials. Machinery upgrade: putting in more productive equipment to use fewer raw materials and generate less waste.
Learn more about pollution at:
https://brainly.com/question/24704410
#SPJ1
The part of the US government that interprets the law is the what?
Answer:
judiciary
Explanation:
The branch of government that interprets the laws and settles legal disputes is the judiciary. This includes the federal and state court systems, and it's the one that makes sense of the laws, constitution, and regulations, and applies them to specific cases. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the US and it has the final say on legal issues that reach it.
The majority of police litigation cases:
Select one:
O a. are without merit.
O b. result in the police receiving substantial awards.
O c. are settled out of court.
O d. are settled at trial.
Answer:
C. are settled out of court.
Explanation:
The majority of police litigation cases are settled out of court, often because the costs of going to trial are too high for either party. Settlements also allow for more flexibility in terms of providing compensation and making adjustments to policies or procedures in order to minimize similar legal disputes in the future.
Natasha is worried about upcoming elections. What kind of civic institution might she join to get involve
Natasha might join a political party or a advocacy group to get involved in the upcoming elections. She could also volunteer for a candidate's campaign, or join a voter registration organization. Additionally, she could attend town hall meetings or join a local chapter of a national organization that focuses on specific issues that she is passionate about.
Answer:
a political group
Explanation:
what is racial discrimination
Race discrimination is when anyone is treated unfairly because of their race, or because of the race of someone they are connected with, such as their partner.
‘Race’ includes colour, citizenship, nationality, and ethnic or national origins. It is against the law to harass a person because the person belongs to a different race or color.
Color discrimination involves treating someone not properly or unfairly because of skin color complexion. Racial discrimination arises as one of the biggest social issues.
Discrimination is the unfair or prejudicial treatment of people and groups based on characteristics such as age, gender, race or sexual orientation. Discrimination can occur when the victim and the person who inflicted the discrimination are of the same race or color.
Learn more about racial discrimination,
brainly.com/question/2864094
brainly.com/question/22630099
Answer: I hope this helps you have a good day
Explanation:
Racial discrimination is any discrimination against any individual on the basis of their skin color, race or ethnic origin. Individuals can discriminate by refusing to do business with, socialize with, or share resources with people of a certain group.
Race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features). Color discrimination involves treating someone unfavorably because of skin color complexion.Race/color discrimination also can involve treating someone unfavorably because the person is married to (or associated with) a person of a certain race or color.Discrimination can occur when the victim and the person who inflicted the discrimination are the same race or color.Race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features).
If you get involved and three crashes, have any grade with and 36 months and you don't take care of the initial penalties what could happen to you
Answer:
Explanation:
If you get involved in three crashes within 36 months and you don't take care of the initial penalties, you could face a license suspension. Depending on the severity of the crashes, you could also face fines, points on your license, and/or higher insurance premiums. Additionally, if the crashes are considered to be more serious (such as a hit-and-run), you could face criminal charges.
Solve the Murder Part 1
You are a detective and arrive on the scene of a grisly
murder and are tasked with figuring out who the killer is.
You expect that this may be a difficult task as the killer
has covered their tracks well. The killer has left a note
mocking you and daring you to find them.
I will kill again in three days unless you can stop me
before then. Perhaps I'll give you a chance. One of
my associates in town knows where I'll be next.
You'll first need to figure out the location of my
associate. Interview the neighbors next door to
figure that out. He won't talk to you however if you
don't give him the secret word. I've left some papers
in the mailbox. Don't bother checking them for prints.
See you in three days
Secret Word
To solve this murder, you would have to secure the scene and go on to carry out forensics and other forms of investigation.
How to solve the murder caseAs a detective, my first step in solving this murder would be to secure the crime scene and gather as much evidence as possible. This would include interviewing any witnesses, taking photographs and collecting any physical evidence that may be present. I would also need to examine the note left by the killer and try to gain any insight from it.
Next, I would interview the neighbors next door to try and find out any information about the killer's associate. I would also check the mailbox for any papers left by the killer as per the note. Even though the killer stated that the papers should not be checked for fingerprints, I would still do so, as well as check for other forms of physical evidence that could lead to the killer.
I would also check any security cameras in the area to see if they captured anything that could be useful in the investigation.
Read more on murder cases here: https://brainly.com/question/30054429
#SPJ1
does the government accurately represent the people who live in the us? why or why not?
i’m pretty sure this is supposed to be an opinion thing but i don’t have one.. and if it isn’t i still don’t know
omg pleas help me
The government of the U.S. represents its people properly as it follows a representative form of government, where the elected members represent the citizens.
What is a government?A government is a system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary. Government is a means by which organizational policies are enforced, as well as a mechanism for determining policy. In many countries, the government has a kind of constitution, a statement of its governing principles and philosophy.
A government is a system to govern a state or community.
Learn more about government, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
Your vehicle without proper maintenance.
A. can become accident-prone
B. won't become accident-prone
C. is unlikely to become accident-prone
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because if you don’t keep cars properly maintained then, it can become accident prone.
Should the organizers of protests be legally accountable for the safety of life and property while the protests take place and should the organizers statements/speeches/rallying cries be used as evidence against them for any violence that takes place?
Answer:
Explanation:
The answer to this question is complicated and depends on many factors. It is important to consider the context of the protest, the nature of the protest, and the actions taken by the organizers.
In general, the organizers of a protest should be held responsible for the safety of life and property. This means that the organizers should be aware of and take steps to mitigate potential risks, such as ensuring that the protest is peaceful, providing adequate security measures, and monitoring the crowd.
However, organizers should not be held accountable for any violence that takes place during a protest. While an organizer's speech may be inflammatory and may incite violence, this does not mean that they should be automatically held responsible for any violence that occurs.
In cases of extreme violence, the organizers may be held accountable, especially if they are found to have encouraged or participated in the violence. However, the burden of proof for such a case would be high, and it is important to consider the full context of the situation before determining if the organizers should be held accountable.
