opinion on gun control

Answer:
The "conflict thesis" is a concept in the history of science and religion that posits that there is an inherent and irreconcilable conflict between science and religion. This idea suggests that the two are in constant opposition and that progress in one necessarily comes at the expense of the other. This thesis was popularized in the late 19th century by scholars like John William Draper and Andrew D White, who claimed that the rise of modern science in the 17th and 18th centuries had been hindered by the church.

Explanation:

However, this methodology is historically problematic because it oversimplifies the complex and varied relationship between science and religion over time. While there have certainly been instances of tension and conflict between the two, there have also been many instances of cooperation, dialogue, and mutual influence. Additionally, the conflict thesis tends to essentialize both science and religion, treating them as monolithic entities that have remained static over time.

One relevant historical example associated with the conflict thesis is the Galileo affair. This was a conflict between Galileo Galilei and the Catholic Church in the early 17th century over the heliocentric model of the solar system, which Galileo supported. The church saw this model as contradicting scripture and forced Galileo to recant his views. This event has often been used to illustrate the conflict between science and religion, but it is important to note that the Galileo affair was a complex political and social event that cannot be reduced to a simple clash between two worldviews.

Zinn's assessment of US history correlate more with Republican views rather than the Federalist's view.

He was quite sympathetic to the nation's social and economic elites and believes that the Constitution does not provide adequate protection for certain segments of the American population.

Further more, he explained that democracy's problem in post-Revolutionary America was not primarily due to Constitutional limitations on voting because rather, had more to do with the social classes of the time.

He was also critical of Madison's argument of Federalist by aksing if the goal of the government is to just maintain order between two equally matched groups.

Read more about Zinn on:

brainly.com/question/13847372

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Second Sino-Japanese War, also known as the War of Resistance Against Japan, was a brutal and devastating conflict that lasted from 1937 to 1945. Following the war, both China and Japan realized the enormous toll that the conflict had taken on their countries and their people. Japan, which had been severely weakened by the war, experienced widespread destruction and loss of life, and was forced to cede all of its territorial gains in China, as well as other territories in the Pacific.

China, on the other hand, emerged from the war as a major military and political power, having successfully fought off a much larger and better-equipped enemy. The war also brought about a greater sense of unity and nationalism among the Chinese people, who had rallied together to fight a common enemy. Overall, the realization that war brought destruction and suffering to both sides contributed to a renewed effort to avoid future conflicts between China and Japan.

Explanation:

The German air force bombed Britain for over eight months in an unsuccessful attempt to invade during World War II.

The German air force launched a bombing campaign on Britain known as the Battle of Britain. The campaign lasted for over eight years as the Germans hoped that by destroying Britain's air defenses and demoralizing its population and could clear the way for a successful invasion of the country.

Despite causing significant damage to British cities and infrastructure, the bombing campaign ultimately failed to achieve its objectives. The Royal Air Force defended the country's airspace and the German military was never able to launch a successful invasion of Britain.

Read more about World war II

brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ1

The influx of political refugees into the United States and the willingness of the U.S. government to accept these refugees have the greatest impact on diplomatic relations with other countries

The acceptance of political refugees can have an impact on diplomatic relations with other countries, especially those from which the refugees are fleeing. It can also impact foreign policy and international perceptions of the United States as a nation that values human rights and provides asylum to those in need.

This can affect trade, aid, and other aspects of diplomacy between nations. Additionally, the treatment of refugees can have an impact on the perception of the United States in the international community.

Learn more about  political refugees at https://brainly.com/question/4701119

#SPJ1

Answer:

The period between 1951 and 1979 was marked by significant changes in the global economy, and Britain was not immune to those changes. During this time, Britain's economy experienced ups and downs, including significant post-war reconstruction, followed by periods of economic growth and decline. Britain's economy was heavily influenced by international trade and global events such as the Cold War, the Vietnam War, and the oil crises of the 1970s.

On the one hand, it can be argued that Britain was at the mercy of the global economy during this period. The changing fortunes of the world economy had a significant impact on Britain's economic growth, employment rates, and inflation. For instance, the 1973 oil crisis led to a sharp rise in oil prices, which negatively affected Britain's economy, leading to high inflation rates, rising unemployment, and a balance of payments crisis.

On the other hand, it can also be argued that government policies, private businesses, and individuals had some degree of control over Britain's economic fortunes during this period. For instance, the British government implemented policies such as the National Health Service and the National Insurance Act, which aimed to improve the welfare of citizens and provide a safety net for workers. Similarly, private businesses invested in research and development, and innovation to remain competitive in the global economy, while individuals also played a role in driving economic growth through their consumption and investment habits.

In conclusion, while the global economy undoubtedly influenced Britain's economic fortunes during the period 1951-1979, it would be an oversimplification to suggest that government policy, private business, and individual behavior had no role in shaping the country's economy.

Given statment "As a result of the Battle of New Orleans, Andrew Jackson became a war hero and the United States demonstrated that it would fight to preserve its Independence from Great Britain." is true. Because the Battle of New Orleans made Andrew Jackson a war hero and symbolized America's determination to defend its independence.

True. The Battle of New Orleans, which took place in 1815 during the War of 1812, resulted in a decisive victory for the United States under the leadership of General Andrew Jackson.

The battle occurred after the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, which officially ended the war, but news of the treaty had not yet reached the combatants.

The American victory at the Battle of New Orleans boosted national morale and solidified Andrew Jackson's reputation as a war hero. It also demonstrated the United States' determination to defend its independence and territorial integrity against British forces. The battle became a symbol of American resilience and helped shape the nation's identity.

However, it is important to note that the Battle of New Orleans did not directly impact the outcome of the War of 1812 or influence the terms of the Treaty of Ghent.

The treaty had already been negotiated before the battle took place. Nevertheless, the battle's significance in American history as a symbol of patriotism and determination remains true.

For similar question on Battle of New Orleans

https://brainly.com/question/2318911

#SPJ11

The event that belongs in the empty box is the 1953 CIA led coup that ousted Iran's democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh, who had nationalized Iran's oil industry, and restored power to the pro-Western shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

The 1953 covert operation by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States to remove Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, and reinstate the pro-Western Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was known as the CIA coup in Iran.

The CIA collaborated with the British intelligence service MI6 to arm and train Iranian agents for the coup as well as to run propaganda efforts against Mossadegh's regime. An organized military and political campaign that was the culmination of the operation was successful in toppling Mossadegh's administration and restoring the Shah to power.

The CIA coup in Iran remains a controversial and sensitive topic in Iranian and international relations to this day.

Learn more on the CIA coup here https://brainly.com/question/932408

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

Which of the following belongs in the empty box below?

President Eisenhower backs the

Shah of Iran in an effort to

prevent communist powers

from obtaining Iranian oil

supplies

Shah of Iran flees from

the Ayatollah Khomeini

to the U.S.

O America boycotts OPEC and begins drilling for oil in Gulf of Mexico

O Iranian students storm U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages

President Carter deports the Shah back to Iranian officials

OPEC cuts off U.S. oil supplies, leading to high gas prices

Please give answer now.

Through a set of laws and programs known as the "Final Solution," Hitler and the Nazi Party were able to persecute and eventually murder Jews.

Hitler became Germany's chancellor in 1933 and began adopting laws intended at marginalizing and discriminating against Jews. He enacted legislation that made it illegal for Jews to work in certain occupations.

Hitler and the Nazi Party persecuted and exterminated Jews using a mix of laws, policies, and propaganda, and their acts have been universally criticized as a flagrant violation of human rights and a crime against humanity.

Learn more about Jewish, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11650171

#SPJ1

Overall, this quote from Pat Buchanan's document "Pat Buchanan on the Culture War (1992)" suggests that he was strongly opposed to the Clintons and believed that their election would bring about negative changes to the country.

What is the loses of change?

This quote suggests that Pat Buchanan believed that Bill Clinton's election, and the subsequent election of his wife Hillary Clinton, would bring about significant and undesirable changes to America. The use of anaphora, or the repetition of the word "change," emphasizes his point and suggests that he believed these changes would be harmful to the country.

Buchanan's statement implies that the changes proposed by the Clintons would be against the values and beliefs of many Americans, as he refers to the United States as "God's country." He suggests that the changes would be unwelcome and not in line with the desires of the American people.

Bill Clinton defeated in the 1992 presidential election.