ow many incongruent primitive roots does 13 have? find a set of this many incongruent primitive roots modulo 13.

The confidence interval for proportion of adults who liked video game is (0.575091,0.8915756 ) from sample. It has a parameter 65%.

Number of enrolled students in STAT during year 2020 = 70

The population of adults that is 18 or above in 2020 = 258.3 million

Number of students are classmates= 30

Out of 30, number of students who like video game = 22

level of significance = 0.95

Let p denote the proportion of students in sample who liked video games. it is p = 22/30 = 0.733.

Using the distribution table, value of z for 95% is equals to the 1.96. From the formula of confidence interval, [tex]CI = p ± z\sqrt{ \frac{ p( 1 - p)}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]= 0.733 ± \sqrt{ \frac{0.733( 1 - 0.733)}{30}}[/tex]

= (0.575091, 0.8915756), the lower limit and upper limit of interval. This interval contains 65% which is population parameter. Hence, required value is (0.575091, 0.8915756).

For more information about confidence interval, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ4

To find the area inside the larger loop and outside the smaller loop of the limaçon r = 1 2 + cos(θ), we need to first plot the curve on a polar graph.

From the graph, we can see that the curve has two loops - one larger loop and one smaller loop. The larger loop encloses the smaller loop.

To find the area inside the larger loop and outside the smaller loop, we can use the formula:

Area = 1/2 ∫[a,b] (r2 - r1)2 dθ

where r2 is the equation of the outer curve (larger loop) and r1 is the equation of the inner curve (smaller loop).

The limits of integration a and b can be found by setting the angle θ such that the curve intersects itself at the x-axis. From the graph, we can see that this occurs at θ = π/2 and θ = 3π/2.

Plugging in the equations for r1 and r2, we get:

r1 = 1/2 + cos(θ)
r2 = 1/2 - cos(θ)

So the area inside the larger loop and outside the smaller loop is:

Area = 1/2 ∫[π/2, 3π/2] ((1/2 - cos(θ))2 - (1/2 + cos(θ))2) dθ

Simplifying and evaluating the integral, we get:

Area = 3π/2 - 3/2 ≈ 1.07

Therefore, the area inside the larger loop and outside the smaller loop of the limaçon r = 1 2 + cos(θ) is approximately 1.07. Note that this area is smaller than the total area enclosed by the curve, since it excludes the area inside the smaller loop.
To find the area inside the larger loop and outside the smaller loop of the limaçon given by the polar equation r = 1 + 2cos(θ), follow these steps:

1. Find the points where the loops intersect by setting r = 0:
1 + 2cos(θ) = 0
2cos(θ) = -1
cos(θ) = -1/2
θ = 2π/3, 4π/3

2. Integrate the area inside the larger loop:
Larger loop area = 1/2 * ∫[r^2 dθ] from 0 to 2π
Larger loop area = 1/2 * ∫[(1 + 2cos(θ))^2 dθ] from 0 to 2π

3. Integrate the area inside the smaller loop:
Smaller loop area = 1/2 * ∫[r^2 dθ] from 2π/3 to 4π/3
Smaller loop area = 1/2 * ∫[(1 + 2cos(θ))^2 dθ] from 2π/3 to 4π/3

4. Subtract the smaller loop area from the larger loop area:
Desired area = Larger loop area - Smaller loop area

After evaluating the integrals and performing the subtraction, you will find the area inside the larger loop and outside the smaller loop of the given limaçon.

Learn more  area inside the  loop about here: brainly.in/question/11016261

#SPJ11

The probabilities are:

(1) P(32) = 1/90

(2) P(odd number) = 1/2

(3) P(a multiple of 5) = 1/5

(4) P(a vowel) = 3/11

(5) P(N or S) = 2/11

(6) P(not C) = 9/11

(7) Probability that two land on heads = 3/8

(8) Probability that the month chosen has less than 31 days = 5/12

(9) Probability of drawing a 9 or diamond from a standard deck of cards = 4/13

(10) Probability that a code starts with the number '7' = 1/10

(11) Probability of not getting doubles = 5/6

(12) Probability that the next song is not Katy Perry song = 30/47

We know that the total number of two digit numbers = 90

(1) 32 is one number.

P(32) = 1/90

(2) Number of odd two digit numbers = 45

P(odd number) = 45/90 = 1/2

(3) Number of multiples of 5 with two digits = 18

P(a multiple of 5) = 18/90 = 1/5

(4) The number of total letters in CANDLESTICK is = 11

Number of vowels in CANDLESTICK = 3

P(a vowel) = 3/11

(5) P(N or S) = P(N) + P(S) = 1/11 + 1/11 = 2/11

(6) P(not C) = 1 - P(C) = 1 - 2/11 = (11-2)/11 = 9/11

(7) Three coins are tossed and sample space is = {HHH, HHT, HTH, HTT, THH, THT, TTH, TTT}

So number of total outcomes = 8

Number of outcomes with two heads = 3

Probability that two land on heads = 3/8

(8) Total number of months in a year = 12

The number of months in a year with less than 31 days = 5

Probability that the month chosen has less than 31 days = 5/12

(9) Total number of cards in deck = 52

Number of 9 cards = 4

Number of diamond cards = 13

Number of cards 9 and diamond = 1

P(9 or diamond) = P(9) + P(Diamond) - P(9 and Diamond) = 4/52 + 13/52 - 1/52 = (4+13-1)/52 = 16/52 = 4/13

(10) If the first digit of three digit security code is 7 then rest two digits can be any one from 10 digits.

Total number of possible security digits = 10*10*10 = 1000

The number of security code starts with 7 = 10*10 = 100

Probability that a code starts with the number '7' = 100/1000 = 1/10

(11) Total number of outcomes when two dices are rolled = 6² = 36

The number of doubles = 6

Probability of getting doubles = 6/36 = 1/6

Probability of not getting doubles = 1 - 1/6 = (6-1)/6 = 5/6

(12) Total number of songs = 14 + 16 + 17 = 47 songs

Number of Katy Perry songs = 17

Probability that the next song is not Katy Perry song = 1 - P(Katy Perry Song) = 1 - 17/47 = (47-17)/47 = 30/47

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

∑  for k = 2 to 6 is the sum in sigma notation for this series of terms.

The series is 2-4+6-8+10-12. The lower limit of summation is 2, which means, the sum starts at the initial term in the series.

The index of summation is k, which implies, the ongoing term in the series is represented by the variable k. So, the sigma notation for this series of terms is ∑ for k = 2 to 6, which means, we are subtracting up the number 2 of the numbers from 2 to 6.

To learn more about the sigma notation, refer the link:

https://brainly.com/question/30360057

#SPJ4

We have: lim n→∞ mn/sqrt(2ln(n)) = μ - 1 Since μ is the population mean and [tex]σ^2[/tex] is the population variance, we know that[tex]μ - σ^2/2[/tex] is the population standard deviation. Therefore, we can conclude that the limit of mn/sqrt(2ln(n)) is at most 1.

To show that [tex]$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{M_n}{\sqrt{2\log n}} \leq 1$[/tex], where [tex]$M_n$[/tex] is the maximum of [tex]$n$[/tex]independent and identically distributed standard normal random variables, we can use the following steps:

We first note that the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the maximum [tex]$M_n$[/tex] is given by the product of the cdfs of the individual random variables, which for a standard normal distribution is [tex]\Phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{x} e^{-t^2/2}dt$.[/tex]

We then use the fact that [tex]\Phi(x) \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{x}$ for all $x > 0$[/tex] (see proof below).

Using the above inequality, we can bound the cdf of [tex]$M_n$[/tex] as follows:

[tex]$\begin{aligned} P(M_n \geq t) &= 1 - P(M_n \leq t) \ &= 1 - \left[ \Phi(t) \right]^n \ &\leq 1 - \left[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{e^{-t^2/2}}{t} \right]^n \ &= 1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}^n} \frac{e^{-nt^2/2}}{t^n} \end{aligned}$[/tex]

We now choose [tex]$t = \sqrt{2\log n}$[/tex] and plug it into the above inequality to get:

[tex]$\begin{aligned} P(M_n \geq \sqrt{2\log n}) &\leq 1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}^n} \frac{e^{-n\log n}}{(\sqrt{2\log n})^n} \ &= 1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}^n} \frac{1}{n^{n/2}} \ &\to 0 \end{aligned}$[/tex]

as[tex]$n \to \infty$, since $n^{n/2}$[/tex] grows faster than [tex]e^{n\log n}$.[/tex]

Finally, we have[tex]$P(M_n \geq \sqrt{2\log n}) \to 0$[/tex] as [tex]n \to \infty$,[/tex]

which implies that [tex]$\frac{M_n}{\sqrt{2\log n}} \to 0$[/tex] in probability.

Since[tex]$0 \leq \frac{M_n}{\sqrt{2\log n}} \leq 1$ for all $n$,[/tex]y the squeeze theorem, we have [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{M_n}{\sqrt{2\log n}} = 0$,[/tex]

and hence [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{M_n}{\sqrt{2\log n}} \leq 1$.[/tex]

Proof of [tex]\Phi(x) \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{x}$:[/tex]

We first define [tex]I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2/2} dx$.[/tex]

We then note that [tex]$I^2 = \left(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2/2} dx\right)\[/tex]

Learn more about population mean

https://brainly.com/question/30727743

#SPJ4

Full Question:  Let[tex]$X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n$[/tex] be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) standard normal random variables. Le[tex]t $M_n = \max{X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n}$[/tex] be the maximum of these random variables. Show that

The probability density function (PDF) of a standard normal random variable [tex]$X$[/tex] is given by [tex]\phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$.[/tex]

The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of [tex]$X$[/tex] is denoted by[tex]$\Phi(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x \phi(t),dt$[/tex], which can be computed numerically or using tables.

Using these facts, we can first find the probability that [tex]$M_n$[/tex] exceeds a certain threshold [tex]$t$[/tex], and then use this to bound the tail probability of [tex]M_n$.[/tex]

Specifically, for any[tex]$t \geq 0$,[/tex]we have

[tex]P(M_n \geq t) &= P(X_1 \geq t, X_2 \geq t, \dots, X_n \geq t) \&= P(X_1 \geq t) P(X_2 \geq t) \cdots P(X_n \geq t) \qquad (\text{by independence}) \[/tex]

[tex]&= \prod_{i=1}^n P(X_i \geq t) \&= \prod_{i=1}^n \left(1 - \Phi(t)\right) \qquad (\text{since } X_i \sim N(0,1)) \&= \left(1 - \Phi(t)\right)^n\end{align*}[/tex]

To make use of this formula, we need to choose an appropriate value of [tex]$t$[/tex] One natural choice is to set [tex]$t = \sqrt{2\log n}$[/tex], which leads to

[tex]P(M_n \geq \sqrt{2\log n}) &= \left(1 - \Phi(\sqrt{2\log n})\right)^n \&= \left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\sqrt{2\log n}} e^{-x^2/2},dx\right)^n \[/tex]

[tex]&= \left(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\sqrt{\log n}} e^{-(x/\sqrt{2})^2},\frac{dx}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^n \qquad (\text{substituting } x = \sqrt{2},t) \[/tex]

[tex]&\leq \left(1 - \frac{1}{n}\right)^n \qquad (\text{since } e^{-(x/\sqrt{2})^2} \leq 1 \text{ for all } x) \&\to e^{-1} \qquad (\text{as } n \to \infty)\end{align*}[/tex]

where we have used the well-known inequality [tex]$(1 - \frac{1}{n})^n \leq e^{-1}$[/tex] for the last step. Thus, we have shown that [tex]\lim_{n\[/tex]

The maximum number of times the main comparison loop will execute for a list of 1 million numbers is closest to 20.

An effective algorithm for narrowing down a list of things is binary search. It divides the section of the list that might contain the item in half repeatedly until there is only one viable position left. In the beginning tutorial's guessing game, binary search was used.

In a binary search algorithm, the main comparison loop divides the search interval in half at each iteration until the target value is found or the search interval is empty. Therefore, the number of times the loop executes is proportional to the number of times the search interval can be divided in half before reaching a length of 1.

For a list of 1 million numbers, the initial search interval includes all 1 million numbers. At the first iteration, the interval is divided in half, leaving 500,000 numbers to search. At the second iteration, the interval is divided in half again, leaving 250,000 numbers. This process continues until the interval contains only one number, which is either the target value or not present in the list.

The number of times the loop executes is equal to the number of times the interval can be divided in half before reaching a length of 1. In this case, the interval length is divided by 2 at each iteration, so the number of iterations required to reach a length of 1 is log base 2 of 1 million:

log2(1,000,000) = 19.93

Therefore, the maximum number of times the main comparison loop will execute for a list of 1 million numbers is closest to 20.

Learn more about binary search on:

https://brainly.com/question/28267253

#SPJ4

The number of integers that remain is $100 - 40 = \boxed{60}$.

To solve this problem, we need to find the set of integers that are not multiples of either $4$ or $5$ within the range from $1$ through $100$. We can do this by using the principle of inclusion-exclusion.

First, we find the number of integers that are multiples of $4$ within the range from $1$ through $100$. We can do this by dividing $100$ by $4$ and rounding down to the nearest whole number. This gives us $25$ multiples of $4$.

Next, we find the number of integers that are multiples of $5$ within the range from $1$ through $100$. We can do this by dividing $100$ by $5$ and rounding down to the nearest whole number. This gives us $20$ multiples of $5$.

However, we have double-counted the integers that are multiples of both $4$ and $5$ (i.e. the multiples of $20$). There are $5$ multiples of $20$ within the range from $1$ through $100$.

So, the total number of integers that are multiples of either $4$ or $5$ within the range from $1$ through $100$ is $25 + 20 - 5 = 40$.

Therefore, the number of integers that remain is $100 - 40 = \boxed{60}$.

To know more about integers,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29736390

#SPJ11

The reason why the United States is destined for the "onward march, according to O'Sullivan, is because of its unique history, geography, and political system.

According to O'Sullivan, it is believed that the United States was destined for an "onward march" due to it's unique in history, geography, and the political system.

O'Sullivan is of the opinion that the US's history of westward expansion and settlement created a culture of rugged individualism and self-reliance that made Americans uniquely suited to succeed in a rapidly changing world.

Learn more about The united States Onward March on:

https://brainly.com/question/26281541

#SPJ1

If the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of items in population 1 is larger than the proportion of items in population 2, then the null hypothesis should be that there is no significant difference in the proportion of items between population 1 and population 2.

Based on the information provided, the null hypothesis should be:

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of items in population 1 is less than or equal to the proportion of items in population 2.

This is denoted as H₀: P₁ ≤ P₂. The alternative hypothesis, as you mentioned, is that the proportion of items in population 1 is larger than the proportion of items in population 2, which is represented as H₁: P₁ > P₂.

to learn more about hypothesis click here:

brainly.com/question/29133217

#SPJ11

We have proven that the Fourier sine series of a continuous function f(x) can be differentiated term by term only if f(0) = 0.

An infinite sum of sines and cosines is used to represent the expansion of a periodic function f(x) into a Fourier series. The orthogonality relationships between the sine and cosine functions are used in the Fourier series.

To prove that the Fourier sine series of a continuous function f(x) can be differentiated term by term only if f(0) = 0, we will use integration by parts and the properties of the Fourier sine series.

First, we write the Fourier sine series of f(x) as:

f(x) = ∑[n=1 to ∞] Bn sin(nx)

where Bn = 2/L ∫[0 to L] f(x) sin(nx) dx is the nth Fourier sine coefficient.

Next, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to x:

f'(x) = ∑[n=1 to ∞] nBn cos(nx)

Now, we can differentiate each term in the Fourier sine series of f(x) term by term if and only if the series converges uniformly. To prove that the series converges uniformly, we will use the Weierstrass M-test.

Let Mn = n|Bn|. Then, we have:

|Mn sin(nx)| = n|Bn| |sin(nx)| ≤ n|Bn| for all x

Since ∑[n=1 to ∞] n|Bn| is convergent by the Dirichlet's test, we have ∑[n=1 to ∞] Mn sin(nx) is uniformly convergent by the Weierstrass M-test.

Therefore, we can differentiate each term in the Fourier sine series of f(x) term by term to get:

f'(x) = ∑[n=1 to ∞] nBn cos(nx)

Now, we evaluate this equation at x = 0 and use the fact that Bn = 2/L ∫[0 to L] f(x) sin(nx) dx to get:

f'(0) = ∑[n=1 to ∞] nBn

If we assume that we can differentiate each term in the Fourier sine series of f(x) term by term and obtain a new series that converges uniformly, then we can interchange the order of differentiation and summation to get:

f''(x) = ∑[n=1 to ∞] -n²Bn sin(nx)

Now, we evaluate this equation at x = 0 and use the fact that Bn = 2/L ∫[0 to L] f(x) sin(nx) dx to get:

f''(0) = ∑[n=1 to ∞] -n²Bn

Therefore, we have:

f''(0) = -2/L ∫[0 to L] f(x) dx

If f(0) = 0, then f''(0) = 0, which implies that the Fourier sine series of f(x) can be differentiated term by term. However, if f(0) ≠ 0, then f''(0) ≠ 0, which implies that the Fourier sine series of f(x) cannot be differentiated term by term.

Therefore, we have proven that the Fourier sine series of a continuous function f(x) can be differentiated term by term only if f(0) = 0.

Learn more about Fourier series on:

https://brainly.com/question/13419597

#SPJ4

For a spinner with 10 equal areas, numbered 1 through 10, the probability that the result is a multiple of 2 and a multiple of 5 is equals to 0.1.

Probability is calculated by dividing the favourable outcomes to the total possible number of outcomes. There is a spinner with 10 equal areas. It can be numbered from 1 to 10. Spinner is spin one time. We have to determine the probability that the result is a multiple of 2 and a multiple of 5. Let us consider an event E : results multiple of 2 and a multiple of 5

Now, Total possible outcomes = 10

= { 1,2,3,4,5,6 ,7,8,9,10}

Multiples of numbers 2 and 5 in 1 to 10 numbers = 1 = {10}

So, number of favourable outcomes = 1

Probability that result is a multiple of 2 and a multiple of 5 = [tex]\frac{1}{10} = 0.1[/tex]

Hence, required probability is 0.1.

For more information about probability, visit https://brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ4

(a) The probability of rolling a 7 is zero for both dice since the 6-sided die has numbers from 1 to 6 and the 8-sided die has numbers from 1 to 8. b) The overall probability of rolling a 4 is 7/96.

(a) The probability of rolling a 7 is zero for both dice since the 6-sided die has numbers from 1 to 6 and the 8-sided die has numbers from 1 to 8.

(b) The probability of rolling a 4 for the 6-sided die is 1/6, and the probability of rolling a 4 for the 8-sided die is 1/8. Since you are three times more likely to pick up the 6-sided die, the overall probability of rolling a 4 is:

(3/4) * (1/6) + (1/4) * (1/8) = 1/16 + 3/192 = 7/96

(c) Let A be the event that you picked up the 6-sided die, and let B be the event that you rolled a 4. Then we want to find the probability of A given B, or P(A|B). By Bayes' theorem, we have:

P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)

P(B|A) is the probability of rolling a 4 given that you have the 6-sided die, which is 1/6. P(A) is the probability of picking up the 6-sided die, which is 3/4. To find P(B), we use the law of total probability:

P(B) = P(B|A) * P(A) + P(B|not A) * P(not A)

P(B|not A) is the probability of rolling a 4 given that you have the 8-sided die, which is 1/8. P(not A) is the probability of not picking up the 6-sided die, which is 1/4. Therefore,

P(B) = (1/6)(3/4) + (1/8)(1/4) = 11/32

Putting it all together, we get:

P(A|B) = (1/6)*(3/4)/(11/32) = 3/11

Therefore, the probability of having picked up the 6-sided die given that you rolled a 4 is 3/11.

(d) Picking up the 6-sided die and rolling a 7 are independent events because the outcome of one event does not affect the outcome of the other. However, since it is impossible to roll a 7 with either die, the probability of rolling a 7 given that you picked up either die is zero.

(e) Let's first find the probability of rolling a 1 at least once in two rolls of the 6-sided die. The probability of not rolling a 1 on a single roll is 5/6, so the probability of not rolling a 1 on either roll is (5/6)*(5/6) = 25/36. Therefore, the probability of rolling a 1 at least once is:

1 - 25/36 = 11/36

Now let's find the probability of rolling the same number twice on two rolls of the 6-sided die. There are six possible outcomes for the first roll, and for each outcome, there is a 1/6 probability of rolling the same number again on the second roll. Therefore, the probability of rolling the same number twice is:

6 * (1/6)*(1/6) = 1/6

For more about probability:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

The answer is t =2.5 and p = 16

To determine the composition of transformations that maps figure efgh to figure efgh, we need to first identify the transformations involved.

A transformation is a change in position, size, or shape of a figure. In this case, we can see that figure efgh has not changed in size or shape, so the transformation must involve a change in position.

One possible transformation that could be involved is a translation, which involves moving the figure along a straight line without changing its size or shape. Another possible transformation is a rotation, which involves turning the figure around a fixed point.

To find the composition of transformations that maps figure efgh to itself, we need to experiment with different combinations of translations and rotations until we find one that works. For example, we could first rotate the figure 90 degrees clockwise around its center, and then translate it 2 units to the right and 3 units up. This composition of transformations would move figure efgh to a new position, but still maintain its size and shape.

Alternatively, we could first translate the figure 2 units to the right and 3 units up, and then rotate it 90 degrees counterclockwise around its center. This would also result in a new position for the figure, but with the same size and shape as the original.

In conclusion, there are multiple compositions of transformations that could map figure efgh to itself, including combinations of translations and rotations. It is important to experiment with different options and test them to ensure that they maintain the size and shape of the figure.

To Know more about rotations click here

brainly.com/question/2763408

#SPJ11

The political strategist wants to  test the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is more than 55%.

The sample size is 800 voters in the town and 60% of the residents favored annexation.

In order to test the claim, a hypothesis test can be conducted. The null hypothesis (H0) would be that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is 55% or less. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is more than 55%.

Using a significance level of 0.01, the critical value for the test is 2.33 (based on a one-tailed test with 799 degrees of freedom). The test statistic can be calculated as follows:  z = (0.6 - 0.55) / sqrt((0.55 * 0.45) / 800) = 3.06, Since the test statistic (3.06) is greater than the critical value (2.33),

there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is more than 55%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the political strategist's claim is supported by the data.

Hypothesis:
- Null hypothesis (H0): The proportion of residents favoring annexation is 55% (p = 0.55)

- Alternative hypothesis (H1): The proportion of residents favoring annexation is more than 55% (p > 0.55), We will use a one-sample z-test for proportions, with a significance level of 0.01.

Given data:
- Sample size (n): 800 voters
- Proportion of residents favoring annexation in the sample: 60% (0.60).

Test statistic calculation: - z = (sample proportion - assumed proportion) / standard error
- Standard error = sqrt[(p * (1 - p)) / n]
- In this case, p = 0.55 (assumed proportion) and n = 800 (sample size).

Find the z-score and compare it to the critical value at the 0.01 significance level (z-critical = 2.33 for a one-tailed test). If the calculated z-score is greater than the critical value,

we reject the null hypothesis, supporting the strategist's claim that more than 55% of residents favor annexation.

To know more about percentage click here

brainly.com/question/24120406

#SPJ11

If London were to run 40 practice trials of the 400 meter dash, 5 trials would be between 84 and 85 seconds.

To solve this problem, we need to use the normal distribution formula and the z-score formula.

First, we need to calculate the z-scores for 84 and 85 seconds:

z₁ = (84 - 83) / 1 = 1

z₂ = (85 - 83) / 1 = 2

Next, we need to look up the area under the standard normal distribution curve between these two z-scores. We can do this using a standard normal distribution table.

we can find the area between these two z-scores by subtracting the area to the left of z₁ from the area to the left of z₂:

area = P(z₁ < Z < z₂) = P(Z < z₂) - P(Z < z₁)

area = P(Z < 2) - P(Z < 1)

area = 0.9772 - 0.8413

area = 0.1359

This means that approximately 13.59% of the practice trials will be between 84 and 85 seconds. To find the actual number of trials, we can multiply this percentage by the total number of trials:

number of trials = 0.1359 * 40

number of trials ≈ 5.44

Rounding to the nearest whole number, we get that about 5 of the 40 practice trials will be between 84 and 85 seconds.

Learn more about Z-Score Formula:

https://brainly.com/question/25099892

#SPJ1

The proof to show that a(bc) is equal to (ab)c and therefore, matrix multiplication is associative is given below.

In order to show that matrix multiplication is associative, we need to demonstrate that the order of multiplication does not matter, i.e., that a(bc) is equal to (ab)c.

First, let's compute a(bc):

a(bc) = a(bp)k(cp)n

= (ab)pk(cp)n

= (ab)c

This shows that a(bc) is equal to (ab)c. Therefore, matrix multiplication is associative.

Learn more about matrix on

https://brainly.com/question/94574

#SPJ4

New salary is $25625

Sorry for bad handwriting

Answer:

Bond Price / Interest Yield, %

$8,500 / 8.24%

$9,500 / 7.37%

$10,500 / 6.67%

$11,500 / 6.09%

$13,500 / 5.19%

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the interest rate or bond price, we can use the following formula:

Bond price = Annual interest payment / Interest rate

For a bond price of $8,500:

Interest rate = Annual interest payment / Bond price

Interest rate = $700 / $8,500

Interest rate = 0.0824 or 8.24%

For an interest yield of 7.37%:

Bond price = Annual interest payment / Interest rate

$8,500 = $700 / 0.0737

Bond price = $9,500.20 or $9,500 (rounded to the nearest hundred dollars)

For a bond price of $10,500:

Interest rate = Annual interest payment / Bond price

Interest rate = $700 / $10,500

Interest rate = 0.0667 or 6.67%

For a bond price of $11,500:

Interest rate = Annual interest payment / Bond price

Interest rate = $700 / $11,500

Interest rate = 0.0609 or 6.09%

For an interest yield of 5.19%:

Bond price = Annual interest payment / Interest rate

$8,500 = $700 / 0.0519

Bond price = $13,481.86 or $13,500 (rounded to the nearest hundred dollars)

So the completed table is:

Bond Price / Interest Yield, %

$8,500 / 8.24%

$9,500 / 7.37%

$10,500 / 6.67%

$11,500 / 6.09%

$13,500 / 5.19%

Since our calculated chi-square value (53.74) is greater than the critical value (13.28), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the proportions of stolen cars for each color are significantly different from the population color proportions.

The null hypothesis is a type of hypothesis that describes the population parameter and is used to examine the validity of experimental results.

To test the hypothesis that proportions stolen are identical to population color proportions, we will use the chi-square goodness of fit test. The null hypothesis is that the proportions of stolen cars for each color are the same as the population color proportions, and the alternative hypothesis is that they are different.

The expected number of stolen cars for each color can be calculated by multiplying the total number of stolen cars by the proportion of each color in the population. For example, the expected number of stolen white cars is 830 * 0.15 = 124.5. The expected numbers for the other colors can be calculated in the same way.

The observed and expected numbers of stolen cars for each color are shown in the table below:

Color | Observed | Expected | (O-E)²/E

------|----------|----------|---------

White | 140      | 124.5    | 2.29

Blue  | 100      | 124.5    | 5.89

Red   | 270      | 290.5    | 1.83

Black | 230      | 249      | 1.22

Other | 90       | 41.5     | 42.51

To calculate the test statistic, we sum the (O-E)²/E values for each color:

chi-square = 2.29 + 5.89 + 1.83 + 1.22 + 42.51 = 53.74

The degrees of freedom for this test are (k-1) = 4, where k is the number of categories (colors) being tested. Using a chi-square distribution table or calculator with 4 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.01, we find the critical value to be 13.28.

Since our calculated chi-square value (53.74) is greater than the critical value (13.28), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the proportions of stolen cars for each color are significantly different from the population color proportions. This suggests that the color of a car may indeed influence the chance that it will be stolen.

Learn more about null hypothesis on:

https://brainly.com/question/14612888

#SPJ4

The absolute minimum amount of gold produced during the California gold rush was at t = 40 years (1888), with a production of G(40) ≈ 0.195 troy ounces.

A function's varied rate of change with respect to an independent variable is referred to as a derivative. When there is a variable quantity and the rate of change is irregular, the derivative is most frequently utilised.

To find the absolute maximum and minimum values of G(t) on the closed interval [0, 40], we need to first find the critical points and endpoints of G(t) on this interval.

Taking the derivative of G(t), we have:

G'(t) = (25(t² + 16) - 25t(2t))/ (t² + 16)²

     = 25(16 - t²) / (t² + 16)²

Setting G'(t) equal to zero, we get:

25(16 - t²) / (t² + 16)² = 0

Simplifying this expression, we have:

16 - t² = 0

This gives us t = ±4.

However, we need to check whether these critical points are actually maximum or minimum points, or neither.

We can do this by using the first derivative test, which involves checking the sign of G'(t) on either side of the critical points.

For t < -4, G'(t) < 0, indicating that G(t) is decreasing.

For -4 < t < 4, G'(t) > 0, indicating that G(t) is increasing.

For t > 4, G'(t) < 0, indicating that G(t) is decreasing.

Therefore, we can conclude that t = -4 is a local maximum point, and t = 4 is a local minimum point.

Next, we need to check the endpoints of the interval [0, 40].

At t = 0, G(0) = 0.

At t = 40, G(40) = 25(40) / (40² + 16) ≈ 0.195 troy ounces.

Comparing all of these values, we can see that the absolute maximum amount of gold produced during the California gold rush was at t = 4 years (1852), with a production of G(4) ≈ 1.562 troy ounces.

The absolute minimum amount of gold produced during the California gold rush was at t = 40 years (1888), with a production of G(40) ≈ 0.195 troy ounces.

Learn more about derivatives on:

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ4

The length of A'B' is D. 8 units, and the angle A' is 37 degrees.

A triangle is a three-sided polygon with three vertices and three angles totaling 180 degrees. A triangle is made up of three angles. These angles are generated by two triangle sides meeting at a common point known as the vertex.

As a result, ABC is dilated by a factor of two to generate A'B'C'.

When the triangle dilates, the length of its sides is multiplied by 2 (the dilation factor), but the angles remain the same (because the shape must remain the same).

As a result, the length of A'B' is = 4 x 2 = 8

And the angle A' is measured at 37 degrees.

To know more about triangle:

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

Correct question:

AABC is dilated by a factor of 2 to produce AA'B'C.

What is A'B, the length of AB after the dilation? What is the measure of A'?

The  answer is that the degrees of freedom for the chi-square test in this scenario would be (7-1) x (3-1) = 12.

In order to calculate the degrees of freedom for a chi-square test, you need to determine the number of categories being compared for each variable and subtract 1 from each. In this case, there are 7 categories for college and 3 categories for employment status, resulting in (7-1) x (3-1) = 12 degrees of freedom.

Long Answer: The chi-square test is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant association between two categorical variables. In this scenario, the career services representative is interested in studying the association between a graduating student's college and their employment status upon graduation.

There are 7 categories for college: arts and letters, business administration, education, engineering, professional studies and fine arts, sciences, and health and human services. There are 3 categories for employment status: unemployed, underemployed or employed outside of field of study, and employed in field of study.

To determine the degrees of freedom for the chi-square test, we need to calculate the number of categories being compared for each variable and subtract 1 from each. In this case, there are 7 categories for college and 3 categories for employment status, resulting in (7-1) x (3-1) = 12 degrees of freedom.

This means that in order to conduct a chi-square test on this data, we would need a sample size of at least 12 observations for each cell in the contingency table (i.e., each combination of college and employment status). If any of the cells have a sample size less than 12, the test may not be reliable or valid.

In summary, the degrees of freedom for the chi-square test in this scenario would be 12, indicating that there are 12 independent pieces of information in the contingency table that can be used to test for an association between college and employment status.

To know more about chi-square test visit:

brainly.com/question/14082240

#SPJ11

14 students had none of the pets mentioned in the problem.

Given Question is related to Sets and Function

By using the principle of inclusion-exclusion,

D = set of students who had a dog

C = set of students who had a cat

F = set of students who had a fish

Let's determine the sizes of the sets and their intersections:

|D| = 50

|C| = 40

|F| = 20

|D ∩ C| = 19

|C ∩ F| = 2

|D ∩ F| = 3

|D ∩ C ∩ F| = 0

|D ∪ C ∪ F| = ?

The size of the union of the sets as follows:

|D ∪ C ∪F| = |D| + |C| + |F| - |D ∩ C| - |C ∩ F| - |D ∩ F| + |D ∩ C ∩ F|

|D ∪ C ∪ F| = 50 + 40 + 20 - 19 - 2 - 3 + 0 = 86

Therefore, there were 86 students who had at least one of these pets.

To find the number of students who had none of these pets, we can subtract this number from the total number of students:

100 - 86 = 14

Therefore, 14 students had none of the pets mentioned in the problem.

To know more about Sets and Function here

https://brainly.com/question/31249554

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

pentagonal, triangular

A 60,000 cubic millimeter box contains rubber balls with a radius of 15 millimeters. A maximum of 4 balls will fit in rubber box.

For finding the maximum number of rubber balls, firstly we will need the volume of the box. We have been given that the volume of the box is 60,000 mm³.

Now, we will find the volume of the rubber balls which have to be fit in the box. We know that the radius of one ball is 15 mm.

Volume of ball = 4/3 πr³

= 4/3 × 22/7 × 15³

= 4/3 × 22/7 × 3375

= 99,000/7

To find the maximum number of balls, we will divide the volume of box by volume of sphere.

Maximum number of balls = volume of box / volume of balls

= 60,000 / (99,000 / 7)

= (60,000 × 7) / 99,000

= 420 / 99

= 4.24

So, rounding up maximum 4 balls can be fit into the box.

To know more about volume:

https://brainly.com/question/9994313

#SPJ1

Correct question:

Rubber balls with a radius of 15 millimeters are stored in a 60,000 cubic millimeter box. What is the maximum number of rubber balls that will fit in the box?

Based on your question, you are asking about the property of expressions a, b, and c, where a ≠ 0. If a ≠ 0, then a/c = b/c. This property states that if you divide two equal expressions by the same nonzero value, the resulting expressions are still equal.

If a is greater than 0, then a/c is also greater than 0 because c is positive. Similarly, b/c is also positive because both b and c are positive. Therefore, a/c is greater than b/c, which can be written as a/c > b/c.

Based on your question, you are asking about the property of expressions a, b, and c, where a ≠ 0. If a ≠ 0, then a/c = b/c. This property states that if you divide two equal expressions by the same nonzero value, the resulting expressions are still equal.

Visit here to learn more about expressions  : https://brainly.com/question/14083225
#SPJ11

Prime factorization of a number using exponential notation with the factors arranged in order of increasing magnitude is called the canonical factorization of the number.

In the canonical factorization, the prime factors are listed in ascending order of their value, and the exponents are used to show the number of times each prime factor appears in the factorization. This representation is unique for each positive integer, and it provides a concise and standardized way to express the prime factorization of a number.

Learn more about prime factors

https://brainly.com/question/29775157

#SPJ4

Therefore, under the null hypothesis of no color preference, we would expect each color to be chosen as the first peck by approximately 9 birds.

Under the null hypothesis of no color preference, the expected number of first pecks for each color would be equal.

The null hypothesis assumes that the birds have no preference for any particular color and their choices are purely random. Therefore, we can assume that the probability of choosing each color is the same. Since there are four colors, the expected number of first pecks for each color would be equal to 36 divided by 4, which is 9.

The researcher studying the pecking behavior of 1-day-old bobwhites observed their choices among four pins with different colored heads inserted in an area painted white. The color of the pin chosen on the bird's first peck was noted for 36 bobwhites. To test the hypothesis of whether the birds had a preference for any particular color, we need to calculate the expected number of first pecks for each color under the null hypothesis of no color preference.

Under the null hypothesis, we assume that the birds' choices are purely random and they have no preference for any particular color. Therefore, the probability of choosing each color is the same, which is 1/4. We can use this probability to calculate the expected number of first pecks for each color.

To calculate the expected number of first pecks for each color, we can multiply the total number of birds (36) by the probability of choosing each color (1/4). This gives us the expected number of first pecks for each color as follows:

Expected number of first pecks for each color = Total number of birds x Probability of choosing each color
= 36 x 1/4
= 9

If the observed number of first pecks for any color is significantly different from 9, then we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the birds have a preference for that particular color.

To know more about probability  visit:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11