Answer:
P = 20/7
Step-by-step explanation:
P/4 = 5/7
Multiply by 4 on both sides.
P = 20/7
Prove or disprove the following conjecture: "The double of the sum of three consecutive triangular number is either measurable by 3 , or it will be after adding one unit" [Please write your answer here]
The conjecture that the double of the sum of three consecutive triangular numbers is either divisible by 3 or becomes divisible by 3 after adding one unit is true.
To prove the conjecture, let's consider three consecutive triangular numbers represented as n(n+1)/2, (n+1)(n+2)/2, and (n+2)(n+3)/2, where n is an integer. The sum of these triangular numbers is (n(n+1) + (n+1)(n+2) + (n+2)(n+3))/2, which simplifies to (3n^2 + 9n + 4)/2. When we double this expression, we get 6n^2 + 18n + 8, which can be factored as 2(3n^2 + 9n + 4). Since 3n^2 + 9n + 4 is divisible by 3 for any integer n, the double of the sum is also divisible by 3. Therefore, the conjecture holds true.
Learn more about conjecture here : brainly.com/question/11224568
#SPJ11
These data sets show the ages of students in two college classes. Class #1: 28,19,21,23,19,24,19,20 Class #2: 18,23,20,18,49,21,25,19 Which class would you expect to have the larger standard deviation in its ages? Explain why. (You may use Excel to calculate the standard deviation, but you still need to use the meaning of standard deviation to explain why the standard deviation of ages in one class is larger than that in the other.)
The standard deviation measures the spread or dispersion of a dataset. By calculating the standard deviation for both Class #1 and Class #2, it is determined that Class #2 has a larger standard deviation than Class #1.
We must calculate the standard deviation for both classes and compare the results to determine which class would likely have the larger age standard deviation. The spread or dispersion of a dataset is measured by the standard deviation.
Using Excel, let's determine the standard deviation for the two classes:
Class #1: 28, 19, 21, 23, 19, 24, 19, 20
Step 1: Determine the ages' mean (average):
Step 2: The mean is equal to 22.5 (28 - 19 - 21 - 23 - 19 - 24 - 19 - 20). For each age, calculate the squared difference from the mean:
(28 - 22.5)^2 = 30.25
(19 - 22.5)^2 = 12.25
(21 - 22.5)^2 = 2.25
(23 - 22.5)^2 = 0.25
(19 - 22.5)^2 = 12.25
(24 - 22.5)^2 = 2.25
(19 - 22.5)^2 = 12.25
(20 - 22.5)^2 = 6.25
Step 3: Sum the squared differences and divide by the number of ages to determine the variance:
The variance is equal to 10.9375 times 8 (32.25 times 12.25 times 2.25 times 12.25 times 6.25). To get the standard deviation, take the square root of the variance:
The standard deviation for Class #2 can be calculated as follows: Standard Deviation = (10.9375) 3.307 18, 23, 20, 18, 49, 21, 25, 19
Step 1: Determine the ages' mean (average):
Mean = (23.875) / 8 = (18 + 23 + 20 + 18 + 49 + 21 + 25 + 19) Step 2: For each age, calculate the squared difference from the mean:
(18 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 34.816
(23 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 0.756
(20 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 14.616
(18 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 34.816
(49 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 640.641
(21 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 8.316
(25 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 1.316
(19 - 23.875)^2 ≈ 22.816
Step 3: Sum the squared differences and divide by the number of ages to determine the variance:
Variance is equal to (34.816, 0.756, 14.616, 34.816, 640.641, 8.316, 1.316, and 22.816) / 8 99.084. To get the standard deviation, take the square root of the variance:
According to the calculations, Class #2 has a standard deviation that is approximately 9.953 higher than that of Class #1 (approximately 3.307).
The standard deviation estimates how much the ages in each class go amiss from the mean. When compared to Class 1, a higher standard deviation indicates that the ages in Class #2 are more dispersed or varied. That is to say, whereas the ages in Class #1 are somewhat closer to the mean, those in Class #2 have a wider range and are more dispersed from the average age.
This could imply that Class #2 has a wider age range, possibly including outliers like the student who is 49 years old, which contributes to the higher standard deviation. On the other hand, Class #1 has ages that are more closely related to the mean and have a smaller standard deviation.
To know more about Standard deviation, visit
brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
There are 4 red, 5 green, 5 white, and 6 blue marbles in a bag. If you select 2 marbles, what is the probability that you will select a blue and a white marble? Give the solution in percent to the nearest hundredth.
The probability of selecting a blue and a white marble is approximately 15.79%.
The total number of marbles in the bag is:
4 + 5 + 5 + 6 = 20
To calculate the probability of selecting a blue marble followed by a white marble, we can use the formula:
Probability = (Number of ways to select a blue marble) x (Number of ways to select a white marble) / (Total number of ways to select 2 marbles)
The number of ways to select a blue marble is 6, and the number of ways to select a white marble is 5. The total number of ways to select 2 marbles from 20 is:
20 choose 2 = (20!)/(2!(20-2)!) = 190
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
Probability = (6 x 5) / 190 = 0.15789473684
Rounding this to the nearest hundredth gives us a probability of 15.79%.
Therefore, the probability of selecting a blue and a white marble is approximately 15.79%.
Learn more about probability from
https://brainly.com/question/30390037
#SPJ11
for a moving-average solution to a forecasting problem, the autocorrelation plot should and the partial autocorrelation plot should . multiple choice slowly approach one; and cyclically approach zero dramatically approach zero; exponentially approach one dramatically cut off to zero; decline to zero whether monotonically or in a wavelike manner slowly approach zero; slowly approach zero none of the options are correct.
In a moving-average (MA) solution for a forecasting problem, the autocorrelation plot should slowly approach zero, while the partial autocorrelation plot should dramatically cut off to zero.
For a moving-average solution to a forecasting problem, the autocorrelation plot should slowly approach zero, and the partial autocorrelation plot should dramatically cut off to zero.
Autocorrelation measures the correlation between a variable and its lagged values. In the case of a moving-average (MA) model, the autocorrelation plot should slowly approach zero. This is because an MA model assumes that the current value of the time series is related to a linear combination of past error terms, which leads to a gradual decrease in autocorrelation as the lag increases. As the lag increases, the influence of the past error terms diminishes, and the autocorrelation should approach zero slowly.
On the other hand, the partial autocorrelation plot represents the correlation between the current value and a specific lag, while controlling for the influence of the intermediate lags. In the case of an MA model, the partial autocorrelation plot should dramatically cut off to zero after a certain lag. This is because the MA model assumes that the current value is directly related to the recent error terms and has no direct relationship with earlier lags. Therefore, the partial autocorrelation should exhibit a significant drop or cut-off after the lag corresponding to the order of the MA model.
It's important to note that these characteristics of the autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots may vary depending on the specific parameters and assumptions of the MA model being used. Therefore, it's crucial to carefully analyze the plots and consider other diagnostic measures to ensure the appropriateness of the chosen forecasting model.
For more such information on: moving-average
https://brainly.com/question/28495879
#SPJ8
Use the method of lines to apply the (second order, explicit)
improved Euler method to the the upwind spatial discretization of
ut + ux = 0 (write down explicitly the corresponding K1 and K2 of
the RK
The complete update formula for the second-order, explicit improved Euler method with upwind spatial discretization of ut + ux = 0 is given by:
[tex]u_{i+1,j} = u_{i,j} - \frac{{u_{x_{i,j+1}} - u_{x_{i,j}}}}{{\Delta x}}\Delta t = u_{i,j} - \frac{{u_{\hat{i},j+2} - 2u_{\hat{i},j+1} + u_{\hat{i},j}}}{{2\Delta x}}\Delta t + O(\Delta t^2)[/tex]
The method of lines is a numerical technique for the solution of partial differential equations that involves discretizing the equation in time and approximating the spatial derivatives using finite difference methods. The second-order, explicit improved Euler method is a time integration technique that uses a two-step procedure to update the solution at each time step.
The upwind spatial discretization of the advection equation ut + ux = 0 is given by
[tex]u_{t_{i,j+1}} - \frac{u_{t_{i,j}}}{\Delta x} + u_{x_{i,j}} \geq 0[/tex]
[tex]u_{t_{i,j+1}} - \frac{u_{t_{i,j}}}{\Delta x} + u_{x_{i,j}} < 0[/tex]
where i is the time index and j is the space index. To apply the second-order, explicit improved Euler method to this spatial discretization, we first define the following notations:
[tex]u_{i,j} = u_{t_{i,j}} + K_{1_{ij}} \Delta t\\K_{1_{ij}} = -\frac{{u_{i,j+1} - u_{i,j}}}{{\Delta \\x}}u_{x_{i,j}} = \frac{{u_{i,j+1} - u_{i,j}}}{{\Delta x}}\\\\K_{2_{ij}} = -\frac{{u_{x_{i,j+1}} - u_{x_{i,j}}}}{{\Delta x}}[/tex]
Then, the time update is given by:
[tex]u_{i+1,j} = u_{i,j} + K_{2_{ij}} \Delta t[/tex]
here K2ij is given by:
[tex]K_{2_{ij}} = -\frac{{u_{xi,j+1} - u_{xi,j}}}{{\Delta x}} = -\frac{{u_{\hat{i},j+2} - u_{\hat{i},j+1} - u_{\hat{i},j+1} + u_{\hat{i},j}}}{{2\Delta x}} = -\frac{{u_{\hat{i},j+2} - 2u_{\hat{i},j+1} + u_{\hat{i},j}}}{{2\Delta x}} + O(\Delta x^2)[/tex]
where O(Δx2) represents the error of the approximation, which is of second order in Δx. Finally, K1ij is given by:
[tex]K_{1_{ij}} = -\frac{{u_{\hat{i},j+1} - u_{\hat{i},j}}}{{\Delta x}} = -\frac{{u_{t_{i,j+1}} - u_{t_{i,j}}}}{{\Delta x}} - \frac{{K_{2_{ij}}}}{2} = -\frac{{u_{t_{i,j+1}} - u_{t_{i,j}}}}{{\Delta x}} + \frac{{u_{\hat{i},j+2} - 2u_{\hat{i},j+1} + u_{\hat{i},j}}}{{4\Delta x}} + O(\Delta x^2)[/tex]
Therefore, the complete update formula for the second-order, explicit improved Euler method with upwind spatial discretization of ut + ux = 0 is given by:
[tex]u_{i+1,j} = u_{i,j} - \frac{{u_{x_{i,j+1}} - u_{x_{i,j}}}}{{\Delta x}}\Delta t = u_{i,j} - \frac{{u_{\hat{i},j+2} - 2u_{\hat{i},j+1} + u_{\hat{i},j}}}{{2\Delta x}}\Delta t + O(\Delta t^2)[/tex]
Learn more about Euler method :
https://brainly.com/question/30699690
#SPJ11
Let be a line and f,g:l→ R coordinate bijections on l. Prove that either f-g is constant on l or f+g is constant on l
To prove the statement, let's consider two cases:
Case 1: Suppose there exists an element x in l such that f(x) - g(x) is nonzero.
In this case, we will show that f - g is constant on l. Let's define a constant c = f(x) - g(x). Now, for any y in l, we have:
f(y) - g(y) = (f(y) - f(x)) + (f(x) - g(x)) + (g(x) - g(y)
= (f(y) - f(x) + c + (g(x) - g(y)
Since f and g are coordinate bijections, there exist unique elements x' and y' in l such that f(x') = f(x) and g(y') = g(y). Therefore, we can rewrite the equation as:
f(y) - g(y) = (f(y) - f(x') + c + (g(x) - g(y')
Now, let's consider the element z = g(x) - f(x'). By the properties of bijections, there exists a unique element z' in l such that g(z') = z. Substituting these values into the equation, we have:
f(y) - g(y) = (f(y) - f(x') + (g(z') + c) + (g(x) - g(y')
Notice that (f(y) - f(x) and (g(x) - g(y') are both constants since f and g are coordinate bijections. Therefore, we can rewrite the equation as:
f(y) - g(y) = (f(y) - f(x') + (g(x) - g(y')+ (g(z') + c)
Since (g(x) - g(y') and (g(z') + c) are both constants, let's define a new constant d = (g(x) - g(y')+ (g(z') + c). The equation now becomes:
f(y) - g(y) = (f(y) - f(x') + d
This shows that f - g is constant on l, as for any y in l, f(y) - g(y) equals a constant value d.
Therefore, we have proven that either f - g is constant on l or f + g is constant on l in both cases, concluding the proof.
Learn more about Coordinate Bijection here:
https://brainly.com/question/13012424
#SPJ1
Let ℓ be a line in the plane, and let A,B, and C be three points in the plane so that A and B are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ, and also B and C are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ. Prove that A and C are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ.
Since points A and C lie on rays that are both on the same side of ℓ as points P and Q, respectively, we can conclude that A and C are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ. This completes the proof.
Since A and B are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ, we know that the line passing through A and B intersects ℓ. Similarly, since B and C are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ, the line passing through B and C also intersects ℓ.
Let P be the point of intersection of the line passing through A and B with ℓ, and let Q be the point of intersection of the line passing through B and C with ℓ.
Consider the ray starting at A and passing through P. This ray intersects ℓ only at P, since it does not intersect the line passing through B and C. Therefore, all points on this ray, including point A, are on the same side of ℓ as point P.
Similarly, consider the ray starting at C and passing through Q. This ray intersects ℓ only at Q, since it does not intersect the line passing through A and B. Therefore, all points on this ray, including point C, are on the same side of ℓ as point Q.
Since points A and C lie on rays that are both on the same side of ℓ as points P and Q, respectively, we can conclude that A and C are in the same half-plane with respect to ℓ. This completes the proof.
Learn more about half-plane from
https://brainly.com/question/29112591
#SPJ11
When P(B) = 0.42 and P(A) = 0.38 then what is P(A u B)?
A) 0.58
B)0.04
C) None of the above
We cannot directly calculate P(A u B) with the information given.
Hence, the answer is (C) None of the above.
The formula for the probability of the union (the "or" operation) of two events A and B is:
P(A u B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A n B)
This formula holds true for any two events A and B, regardless of whether or not they are independent.
However, in order to use this formula to find the probability of the union of A and B, we need to know the probability of their intersection (the "and" operation), denoted as P(A n B). This represents the probability that both A and B occur.
If we are not given any information about the relationship between A and B (whether they are independent or not), we cannot assume that P(A n B) = P(A) * P(B). This assumption can only be made if A and B are known to be independent events.
Therefore, without any additional information about the relationship between A and B, we cannot directly calculate the probability of their union using the given probabilities of P(A) and P(B). Hence, the answer is (C) None of the above.
Learn more about information from
https://brainly.com/question/27894163
#SPJ11
Deteine a unit noal vector of each of the following lines in R2. (a) 3x−2y−6=0 (b) x−2y=3 (c) x=t[1−3]−[11] for t∈R (d) {x=2t−1y=t−2t∈R
To find a unit normal vector for each line in R2, we can use the following steps:
(a) Line: 3x - 2y - 6 = 0
To find a unit normal vector, we can extract the coefficients of x and y from the equation. In this case, the coefficients are 3 and -2. A unit normal vector will have the same direction but with a magnitude of 1. To achieve this, we can divide the coefficients by the magnitude:
Magnitude = sqrt(3^2 + (-2)^2) = sqrt(9 + 4) = sqrt(13)
Unit normal vector = (3/sqrt(13), -2/sqrt(13))
(b) Line: x - 2y = 3
Extracting the coefficients of x and y, we have 1 and -2. To find the magnitude of the vector, we calculate:
Magnitude = sqrt(1^2 + (-2)^2) = sqrt(1 + 4) = sqrt(5)
Unit normal vector = (1/sqrt(5), -2/sqrt(5))
(c) Line: x = t[1, -3] - [1, 1] for t ∈ R
The direction vector for the line is [1, -3]. Since the direction vector already has a magnitude of 1, it is already a unit vector.
Unit normal vector = [1, -3]
(d) Line: {x = 2t - 1, y = t - 2 | t ∈ R}
The direction vector for the line is [2, 1]. To find the magnitude, we calculate:
Magnitude = sqrt(2^2 + 1^2) = sqrt(4 + 1) = sqrt(5)
Unit normal vector = (2/sqrt(5), 1/sqrt(5))
Therefore, the unit normal vectors for each line are:
(a) (3/sqrt(13), -2/sqrt(13))
(b) (1/sqrt(5), -2/sqrt(5))
(c) [1, -3]
(d) (2/sqrt(5), 1/sqrt(5))
To learn more about unit normal vectors :https://brainly.com/question/31476693
#SPJ11
paul's plumbing is a small business that employs 12 people. which of the following is the best example of an implicit cost incurred by this firm?
The best example of an implicit cost incurred by Paul's Plumbing, a small business that employs 12 people, is: The accounting services provided free of charge to the firm by Paul's wife, who is an accountant.
Implicit cost is a type of economic cost that is not reflected in a company's accounting records or financial statements. These costs can be seen as indirect costs that are not incurred on a cash basis. The opportunity cost of any resources used in producing a good or service is known as an implicit cost. Therefore, the accounting services provided free of charge to the firm by Paul's wife, who is an accountant, are considered the best example of implicit costs. Because this service is not included in the company's accounting records or financial statements.
However, the wages paid to the 12 employees, half of the payroll taxes on the wages of the 12 employees paid by the employers, but not the half paid by the employees, and tax payments on property owned by the firm, are examples of explicit costs.
Learn more about implicit cost: https://brainly.com/question/7824689
#SPJ11
Using the point -slope formula y-y_(1)=m(x-x_(1)), find the equation of the line whose slope is 7 and that passes through the point (-2,11). Write the equation in slope intercept form, y=mx+b.
The equation of the line in slope-intercept form is y = 7x + 25.
The point-slope formula is:
y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)
where m is the slope of the line, and (x₁, y₁) are the coordinates of a point on the line.
Use the point-slope formula to find the equation of the line whose slope is 7 and passes through the point (-2, 11).y - 11 = 7(x - (-2))
Simplify the equation:
y - 11 = 7(x + 2)y - 11 = 7x + 14y = 7x + 14 + 11y = 7x + 25
The equation in slope-intercept form is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Therefore, the equation of the line in slope-intercept form is:
y = 7x + 25
To know more about slope-intercept form here:
https://brainly.com/question/22057368
#SPJ11
suppose that the manufacturing of an anxiety medication follows the normal probability law, with mean= 200mg andstudent submitted image, transcription available below=15mg of active ingredient. if the medication requires at least 200mg to be effective what is the probability that a random pill is effective?
The probability of z-score equal to zero is 0.5.Therefore, the probability that a random pill is effective is 0.5 or 50%.
The given data are:
Mean = μ = 200mg
Standard Deviation = σ = 15mg
We are supposed to find out the probability that a random pill is effective, given that the medication requires at least 200mg to be effective.
The mean of the normal probability distribution is the required minimum effective dose i.e. 200 mg. The standard deviation is 15 mg. Therefore, z-score can be calculated as follows:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where x is the minimum required effective dose of 200 mg.
Substituting the values, we get:
z = (200 - 200) / 15 = 0
According to the standard normal distribution table, the probability of z-score equal to zero is 0.5.Therefore, the probability that a random pill is effective is 0.5 or 50%.
Learn more about z-score visit:
brainly.com/question/31871890
#SPJ11
A consumer group claims that the average wait time at a facility exceeds 40 minutes. Write the appropriate null and alternative hypothesis to test the claim.
(you may use the Math editor ("") OR you may use these symbols: mu for population mean, >= for greater than or equal to, <= for less than or equal to, != for not equal to)
The hypothesis test will help determine if there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, indicating that the consumer group's claim about the average wait time exceeding 40 minutes is supported by the data.
The appropriate null and alternative hypotheses to test the claim are:
Null hypothesis (H0): The average wait time at the facility is equal to or less than 40 minutes.
Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The average wait time at the facility exceeds 40 minutes.
In symbols, it can be represented as:
H0: μ <= 40 (population mean is equal to or less than 40)
Ha: μ > 40 (population mean exceeds 40)
The null hypothesis assumes that the average wait time is no greater than 40 minutes, while the alternative hypothesis suggests that the average wait time is greater than 40 minutes. The hypothesis test will help determine if there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, indicating that the consumer group's claim about the average wait time exceeding 40 minutes is supported by the data.
Learn more about hypothesis test from
https://brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ11
Solve the recurrence: T(n)=2T(n)+(loglogn)2 (Hint: Making change of variable)
The solution to the recurrence is `T(n) = Θ(lognloglogn)`.
To solve the recurrence T(n)=2T(n)+(loglogn)2, we use a substitution method.
Making change of variable:
To make the change of variable, we first define `n = 2^m` where `m` is a positive integer.
We substitute the equation as follows: T(2^m) = 2T(2^(m-1)) + log^2(m).
We then define the following: `S(m) = T(2^m)`.
Then, we substitute the equation as follows: `S(m) = 2S(m-1) + log^2(m)`.
Using the master theorem:
To solve `S(m) = 2S(m-1) + log^2(m)`, we use the master theorem, which gives: `S(m) = Θ(mlogm)`
Hence, we have: `T(n) = S(logn) = Θ(lognloglogn)`
Therefore, the solution to the recurrence is `T(n) = Θ(lognloglogn)`.
A substitution method is a technique used to solve recurrences.
It involves substituting equations with other expressions to solve the recurrence.
In this case, we made a change of variable to make it easier to solve the recurrence.
After defining the new variable, we substituted the equation and applied the master theorem to find the solution.
The solution was then expressed in big theta notation, which is a mathematical notation that describes the behavior of a function.
To know more about substitution method, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22340165
#SPJ11
Using significance figures rules and propagation of random error rules only (i.e., do not report your answer using the convention for reporting measurements!), evaluate the value of y,ey (the absolute uncertainty), %ey (the percent relative uncertainty) for the following calculations. Be sure to show each step of your calculation and use the subscript notation for denoting non-significant figures. a. 9.48(±0.10)×8.47(±0.05)−0.18(±0.06) (Answer: 80.1(±0.97),80.1(±1.2%)) b. (5.54(±0.08))0.5 (Answer: 2.35(±0.02),2.35(±0.9%)) c. log(3.24(±0.06)) (Partial answer: 0.510(±0.008)) d. 103.24(±0.02) (Partial answer: 1.7×103(±0.08×103)=1.7(±0.08)×103) e. 0.20164(±0.00008)×105+1.233(±0.002)×102+4.61(±0.01)×101 (Partial answer: 203.33(±0.08)×102)=20333(±8)) f. (6.14(±0.05)1/3 (Partial answer: 1.83(±0.005)
The value of y is approximately 1.83(±0.005).
a. 9.48(±0.10)×8.47(±0.05)−0.18(±0.06)
Step 1: Calculate the value of the expression:
9.48 × 8.47 - 0.18 = 80.1138
Step 2: Calculate the absolute uncertainty (ey):
ey = |0.10 × 8.47| + |0.05 × 9.48| + |0.06| = 0.847 + 0.474 + 0.06 = 1.381
Step 3: Calculate the percent relative uncertainty (%ey):
%ey = (ey / 80.1138) × 100 = (1.381 / 80.1138) × 100 = 1.726%
Therefore, the value of y is 80.1(±0.97) and the percent relative uncertainty is 80.1(±1.2%).
b. (5.54(±0.08))^0.5
Step 1: Calculate the value of the expression:
(5.54)^0.5 = 2.3503
Step 2: Calculate the absolute uncertainty (ey):
ey = |0.08 / (2 × 5.54^0.5)| = 0.008
Step 3: Calculate the percent relative uncertainty (%ey):
%ey = (ey / 2.3503) × 100 = (0.008 / 2.3503) × 100 = 0.34%
Therefore, the value of y is 2.35(±0.02) and the percent relative uncertainty is 2.35(±0.9%).
c. log(3.24(±0.06))
Step 1: Calculate the value of the expression:
log(3.24) ≈ 0.510
Step 2: Calculate the absolute uncertainty (ey):
ey = |0.06 / 3.24| ≈ 0.018
Therefore, the value of y is approximately 0.510(±0.008).
d. 10^3.24(±0.02)
Step 1: Calculate the value of the expression:
10^3.24 ≈ 1.7 × 10^3
Step 2: Calculate the absolute uncertainty (ey):
ey = |0.02 × 10^3.24| ≈ 0.08 × 10^3 ≈ 8
Therefore, the value of y is approximately 1.7(±0.08) × 10^3.
e. 0.20164(±0.00008)×10^5 + 1.233(±0.002)×10^2 + 4.61(±0.01)×10^1
Step 1: Calculate the value of the expression:
0.20164 × 10^5 + 1.233 × 10^2 + 4.61 × 10^1 = 20333
Step 2: Calculate the absolute uncertainty (ey):
ey = |0.00008 × 10^5| + |0.002 × 10^2| + |0.01 × 10^1| = 8 + 0.002 + 0.1 = 8.102
Therefore, the value of y is 20333(±8).
f. (6.14(±0.05))^(1/3)
Step 1: Calculate the value of the expression:
(6.14)^(1/3)
≈ 1.829
Step 2: Calculate the absolute uncertainty (ey):
ey = |0.05 / (3 × 6.14^(2/3))| ≈ 0.005
Therefore, the value of y is approximately 1.83(±0.005).
Learn more about percent relative here:
https://brainly.com/question/32510240
#SPJ11
Decimal Wheels Franco and Lisa are playing a game with decimal numbers. The first player to correctly write the missing numbers in each decimal wheel is the winner. 4. MP. 8 Use Repeated Reasoning Starting at the top.
The completed decimal wheel 4. MP. 8 would be 4.76.
To determine the missing numbers in the decimal wheel 4. MP. 8, we can use repeated reasoning by examining the pattern and making deductions based on the given information.
Starting from the top, let's analyze the pattern and reason our way through:
Looking at the tenths place, we see that the decimal number is 4. Since there are no other given clues for this wheel, we can deduce that the missing number in the tenths place is 4.
Moving to the hundredths place, we see that the decimal number is M. Based on the pattern, we can observe that the hundredths digit is decreasing by 1 each time.
Therefore, the missing number in the hundredths place would be 7, following the pattern.
Now, looking at the thousandths place, we see that the decimal number is P. Following the pattern from the previous reasoning, we can deduce that the missing number in the thousandths place is 6.
Therefore, the completed decimal wheel 4. MP. 8 would be 4.76.
To learn more about decimal number
https://brainly.com/question/28393353
#SPJ11
The function f(x)=x^(2)-2,x>=0 is one -to-one (a) Find the inverse of f
For a function to be one-to-one, every element in the range of the function should be paired with exactly one element in the domain. The inverse of the function f(x) is given by: f⁻¹(x) = √(x + 2)
Given function is f(x) = x² − 2, x ≥ 0. We need to find the inverse of the function f(x).
The given function can be written as y = f(x)
= x² − 2, x ≥ 0
To find the inverse, we need to express x in terms of y. Hence, we have y = x² − 2
We need to solve for x:
x² = y + 2
Taking square roots, x = ±√(y + 2)
Since x is greater than or equal to 0, we can write: x = √(y + 2)
Since the inverse of the given function exists, it is one-to-one as well.
To know more about the function, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29633660
#SPJ11
You are given the equation 13 = 2x + 5 with no solution set.
Part A: Determine two values that make the equation false. (10 points)
Part B: Explain why your integer solutions are false. Show all work. (10 points)
A paper company is interested in estimating the proportion of trees in a 700 -acre forest with diameters exceeding 4 feet. The company selects 45 plots ( 100 feet by 100 feet ) from the forest and utilizes the information from the 45 plots to help estimate the proportion for the whole forest. Ident
The process of estimating the proportion of trees in a 700-acre forest with diameters exceeding 4 feet, using a sample of 45 plots, is called statistical inference.
The company can use the information collected from the 45 plots to estimate the proportion of trees with diameters exceeding 4 feet in the entire forest. This process is useful as it saves time and resources that would have been spent surveying the entire forest. The sample size of 45 plots is sufficient to represent the population of the entire forest. A sample of 45 plots is relatively large, and the Central Limit Theorem can be used. A sample size of 30 or greater is typically sufficient for the CLT to be used. The company can use this information to obtain a sample mean and a sample standard deviation from the sample of 45 plots. The confidence interval is calculated using the sample mean and standard deviation. A 95% confidence interval is a range of values within which the true proportion of trees with diameters exceeding 4 feet in the forest can be found. If this range is too large, the company may need to consider taking a larger sample. Additionally, if the sample is not randomly selected, it may not be representative of the entire population.
Statistical inference is the process of estimating population parameters using sample data. The sample data is used to make inferences about the population parameters. A paper company interested in estimating the proportion of trees in a 700-acre forest with diameters exceeding 4 feet is a good example of statistical inference.The company selected 45 plots from the forest, and each plot was 100 feet by 100 feet. The information from the 45 plots was used to estimate the proportion of trees with diameters exceeding 4 feet for the entire forest. This is a more efficient way of estimating the proportion than surveying the entire forest. A sample size of 45 is relatively large, and the Central Limit Theorem can be used. The confidence interval is calculated using the sample mean and standard deviation. If the 95% confidence interval is too large, the company may need to take a larger sample. Additionally, if the sample is not randomly selected, it may not be representative of the entire population.
Statistical inference is an important process used to estimate population parameters using sample data. The company can use this process to estimate the proportion of trees in a 700-acre forest with diameters exceeding 4 feet. The sample size of 45 plots is relatively large, and the Central Limit Theorem can be used. If the 95% confidence interval is too large, the company may need to take a larger sample. If the sample is not randomly selected, it may not be representative of the entire population.
To know more about standard deviation visit
brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
According to data, the accident rate as a function of the age of the driver in years x can be approximated by the function f(x)=98.5−2.36x+0.0245x2 for 16≤x≤85. Find the age at which the accident rate is a minimum and the minimum rate.
The age at which the accident rate is a minimum is approximately 48.163 years. The minimum accident rate is approximately 73.797.
To find the age at which the accident rate is a minimum and the corresponding minimum rate, we can find the critical points of the function [tex]f(x) = 98.5 - 2.36x + 0.0245x^2[/tex] within the given interval.
First, let's find the derivative of the function f(x):
f'(x) = -2.36 + 0.049x
Next, we set f'(x) equal to zero and solve for x to find the critical point:
-2.36 + 0.049x = 0
0.049x = 2.36
x = 2.36 / 0.049
x ≈ 48.163
The critical point occurs at x ≈ 48.163.
To confirm whether this critical point is a minimum or maximum, we can analyze the second derivative:
f''(x) = 0.049
Since the second derivative is positive (0.049 > 0), the critical point represents a minimum.
Therefore, the age at which the accident rate is a minimum is approximately 48.163 years. To find the minimum rate, we substitute this value back into the function:
[tex]f(48.163) = 98.5 - 2.36(48.163) + 0.0245(48.163)^2[/tex]
Calculating this expression will give us the minimum rate.
[tex]f(48.163) = 98.5 - 2.36(48.163) + 0.0245(48.163)^2[/tex]
≈ 73.797
To know more about minimum rate,
https://brainly.com/question/14396625
#SPJ11
(5) 3x+5=0 will have Solutions: Two three no solution
For the given equation, The solution is -5/3 , Since it is a single solution to the equation ,so answer is one.
The given equation is 3x + 5 = 0, solve for x. The given equation is 3x + 5 = 0To solve the given equation, we need to isolate x to one side of the equation. Here, we need to isolate x, so we will subtract 5 from both sides.3x + 5 - 5 = 0 - 5. Simplify the above equation.3x = -5. Divide both sides by 3 to isolate x.3x/3 = -5/3.
Therefore, the solution of the given equation 3x + 5 = 0 is x = -5/3.This equation has only one solution, x = -5/3.Therefore, the correct option is 'one.'
Let's learn more about equation:
https://brainly.com/question/29174899
#SPJ11
What is the theia ncotation for the folowing expression: n+2
(n+1)(n+2)
4. (n 3
) +a (κ 2
) Θ(n) Question 16 What is the theta notation of f(n)+g(n)) f(n)=Θ(1)
g(n)=θ(n 2
)
θ(n 3
) A(π 2
) E (n) θ(n 2
+1)
The first expression is unclear due to non-standard notation, and the second expression, f(n) + g(n) with f(n) = Θ(1) and g(n) = θ(n²), has a time complexity of θ(n²).
Let's break multiple expressions down and determine their corresponding theta notation:
1. Expression: n + 2(n + 1)(n + 2) / 4. (n³) + a (κ²) Θ(n)
It appears that this expression has several terms with different variables and exponents. However, it's unclear what you mean by "(κ²)" and "Θ(n)" in this context. The notation "(κ²)" is not a standard mathematical notation, and Θ(n) typically represents a growth rate, not a multiplication factor.
2. Expression: f(n) + g(n)
Given f(n) = Θ(1) and g(n) = θ(n²), we can determine the theta notation of their sum:
Since f(n) = Θ(1) implies a constant time complexity, and g(n) = θ(n²) represents a quadratic time complexity, the sum of these two functions will have a time complexity of θ(n²) since the dominant term is n².
Therefore, the theta notation for f(n) + g(n) is θ(n²).
To know more about theta notation, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/32723136#
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
Calculate the double integral. 6x/(1 + xy) dA, R = [0, 6] x [0, 1]
The value of the double integral ∬R (6x/(1 + xy)) dA over the region
R = [0, 6] × [0, 1] is 6 ln(7).
To calculate the double integral ∬R (6x/(1 + xy)) dA over the region
R = [0, 6] × [0, 1], we can integrate with respect to x and y using the limits of the region.
The integral can be written as:
∬R (6x/(1 + xy)) dA = [tex]\int\limits^1_0\int\limits^6_0[/tex] (6x/(1 + xy)) dx dy
Let's start by integrating with respect to x:
[tex]\int\limits^6_0[/tex](6x/(1 + xy)) dx
To evaluate this integral, we can use a substitution.
Let u = 1 + xy,
du/dx = y.
When x = 0,
u = 1 + 0y = 1.
When x = 6,
u = 1 + 6y
= 1 + 6
= 7.
Using this substitution, the integral becomes:
[tex]\int\limits^7_1[/tex] (6x/(1 + xy)) dx = [tex]\int\limits^7_1[/tex](6/u) du
Integrating, we have:
= 6 ln|7| - 6 ln|1|
= 6 ln(7)
Now, we can integrate with respect to y:
= [tex]\int\limits^1_0[/tex] (6 ln(7)) dy
= 6 ln(7) - 0
= 6 ln(7)
Therefore, the value of the double integral ∬R (6x/(1 + xy)) dA over the region R = [0, 6] × [0, 1] is 6 ln(7).
Learn more about double integral here:
brainly.com/question/15072988
#SPJ4
The value of the double integral [tex]\int\limits^1_0\int\limits^6_0 \frac{6x}{(1 + xy)} dA[/tex], over the given region [0, 6] x [0, 1] is (343/3)ln(7).
Now, for the double integral [tex]\int\limits^1_0\int\limits^6_0 \frac{6x}{(1 + xy)} dA[/tex], use the standard method of integration.
First, find the antiderivative of the function 6x/(1 + xy) with respect to x.
By integrating with respect to x, we get:
∫(6x/(1 + xy)) dx = 3ln(1 + xy) + C₁
where C₁ is the constant of integration.
Now, we apply the definite integral over x, considering the limits of integration [0, 6]:
[tex]\int\limits^6_0 (3 ln (1 + xy) + C_{1} ) dx[/tex]
To proceed further, substitute the limits of integration into the equation:
[3ln(1 + 6y) + C₁] - [3ln(1 + 0y) + C₁]
Since ln(1 + 0y) is equal to ln(1), which is 0, simplify the expression to:
3ln(1 + 6y) + C₁
Now, integrate this expression with respect to y, considering the limits of integration [0, 1]:
[tex]\int\limits^1_0 (3 ln (1 + 6y) + C_{1} ) dy[/tex]
To integrate the function, we use the property of logarithms:
[tex]\int\limits^1_0 ( ln (1 + 6y))^3 + C_{1} ) dy[/tex]
Applying the power rule of integration, this becomes:
[(1/3)(1 + 6y)³ln(1 + 6y) + C₂] evaluated from 0 to 1,
where C₂ is the constant of integration.
Now, we substitute the limits of integration into the equation:
(1/3)(1 + 6(1))³ln(1 + 6(1)) + C₂ - (1/3)(1 + 6(0))³ln(1 + 6(0)) - C₂
Simplifying further:
(343/3)ln(7) + C₂ - C₂
(343/3)ln(7)
So, the value of the double integral [tex]\int\limits^1_0\int\limits^6_0 \frac{6x}{(1 + xy)} dA[/tex], over the given region [0, 6] x [0, 1] is (343/3)ln(7).
To learn more about integration visit :
brainly.com/question/18125359
#SPJ4
use propositional logic to prove that the argument is valid. 13. (A∨B′)′∧(B→C)→(A′∧C) 14. A′∧∧(B→A)→B′ 15. (A→B)∧[A→(B→C)]→(A→C) 16. [(C→D)→C]→[(C→D)→D] 17. A′∧(A∨B)→B
Propositional Logic to prove the validity of the arguments
13. (A∨B′)′∧(B→C)→(A′∧C) Solution: Given statement is (A∨B′)′∧(B→C)→(A′∧C)Let's solve the given expression using the propositional logic statements as shown below: (A∨B′)′ is equivalent to A′∧B(B→C) is equivalent to B′∨CA′∧B∧(B′∨C) is equivalent to A′∧B∧B′∨CA′∧B∧C∨(A′∧B∧B′) is equivalent to A′∧B∧C∨(A′∧B)
Distributive property A′∧(B∧C∨A′)∧B is equivalent to A′∧(B∧C∨A′)∧B Commutative property A′∧(A′∨B∧C)∧B is equivalent to A′∧(A′∨C∧B)∧B Distributive property A′∧B∧(A′∨C) is equivalent to (A′∧B)∧(A′∨C)Therefore, the given argument is valid.
14. A′∧∧(B→A)→B′ Solution: Given statement is A′∧(B→A)→B′Let's solve the given expression using the propositional logic statements as shown below: A′∧(B→A) is equivalent to A′∧(B′∨A) is equivalent to A′∧B′ Therefore, B′ is equivalent to B′∴ Given argument is valid.
15. (A→B)∧[A→(B→C)]→(A→C) Solution: Given statement is (A→B)∧[A→(B→C)]→(A→C)Let's solve the given expression using the propositional logic statements as shown below :A→B is equivalent to B′→A′A→(B→C) is equivalent to A′∨B′∨C(A→B)∧(A′∨B′∨C)→(A′∨C) is equivalent to B′∨C∨(A′∨C)
Distributive property A′∨B′∨C∨B′∨C∨A′ is equivalent to A′∨B′∨C Therefore, the given argument is valid.
16. [(C→D)→C]→[(C→D)→D] Solution: Given statement is [(C→D)→C]→[(C→D)→D]Let's solve the given expression using the propositional logic statements as shown below: C→D is equivalent to D′∨CC→D is equivalent to C′∨DC′∨D∨C′ is equivalent to C′∨D∴ The given argument is valid.
17. A′∧(A∨B)→B Solution: Given statement is A′∧(A∨B)→B Let's solve the given expression using the propositional logic statements as shown below: A′∧(A∨B) is equivalent to A′∧BA′∧B→B′ is equivalent to A′∨B′ Therefore, the given argument is valid.
To know more about Propositional Logic refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13104824
#SPJ11
the displacement (in feet) of a particle moving in a straight line is given by s = 1/2t2 − 5t + 15, where t is measured in seconds.
(a) Find the average velocity (in ft/s) over each time interval.
(i) [4, 8]
(ii) [6, 8]
(iii) [8, 10]
(iv) [8, 12]
(b) Find the instantaneous velocity (in ft/s) when t = 8.
Average velocities over different time intervals are calculated using the displacement function, while instantaneous velocity is found by taking the derivative.
(a) The average velocity over each time interval is as follows:
(i) [4, 8]: Average velocity = (s(8) - s(4)) / (8 - 4)
(ii) [6, 8]: Average velocity = (s(8) - s(6)) / (8 - 6)
(iii) [8, 10]: Average velocity = (s(10) - s(8)) / (10 - 8)
(iv) [8, 12]: Average velocity = (s(12) - s(8)) / (12 - 8)
(b) To find the instantaneous velocity when t = 8, we need to find the derivative of the displacement function with respect to time. The derivative of s(t) is v(t), the velocity function. Therefore, we need to evaluate v(8).
(a) To find the average velocity over each time interval, we use the formula for average velocity: average velocity = (change in displacement) / (change in time). We substitute the given time interval values into the displacement function and calculate the differences to find the change in displacement and time. Then, we divide the change in displacement by the change in time to get the average velocity.
(b) To find the instantaneous velocity when t = 8, we find the derivative of the displacement function, s(t), with respect to time. The derivative, v(t), represents the instantaneous velocity at any given time. By substituting t = 8 into the derivative function, we can find the value of v(8), which gives us the instantaneous velocity at t = 8.
To learn more about derivative click here
brainly.com/question/29020856
#SPJ11
U.S. Farms. As the number of farms has decreased in the United States, the average size of the remaining farms has grown larger, as shown in the table below. Enter years since 1900.(1910−10,1920−20,…)A. What is the explanatory variable? Response variable? (1pt) B. Create a scatterplot diagram and identify the form of association between them. Interpret the association in the context of the problem. ( 2 pts) C. What is the correlational coefficient? (1pt) D. Is the correlational coefficient significant or not? Test the significance of "r" value to establish if there is a relationship between the two variables. (2 pts) E. What is the equation of the linear regression line? Use 4 decimal places. (1pt) F. Interpret the slope and they- intercept in the context of the problem. (2 pts) Slope -y- intercept - G. Use the equation of the linear model to predict the acreage per farm for the year 2015. (Round off to the nearest hundredth. (3pts) H. Calculate the year when the Acreage per farm is 100 . (3pts)
The explanatory variable is the year, which represents the independent variable that explains the changes in the average acreage per farm.
The response variable is the average acreage per farm, which depends on the year.
By plotting the data points on a graph with the year on the x-axis and the average acreage per farm on the y-axis, we can visualize the relationship between these variables. The x-axis represents the explanatory variable, and the y-axis represents the response variable.
To analyze this relationship mathematically, we can perform regression analysis, which allows us to determine the trend and quantify the relationship between the explanatory and response variables. In this case, we can use linear regression to fit a line to the data points and determine the slope and intercept of the line.
The slope of the line represents the average change in the response variable (average acreage per farm) for each unit increase in the explanatory variable (year). In this case, the positive slope indicates that, on average, the acreage per farm has been increasing over time.
The intercept of the line represents the average acreage per farm in the year 1900. It provides a reference point for the regression line and helps us understand the initial condition before any changes occurred.
To know more about average here
https://brainly.com/question/16956746
#SPJ4
A car has an average speed of 85.5 kilometers per hour for one hour, and then an average speed of 55.5 kilometers per hour for two hours during a three -hour trip. What was the average speed, in kilom
The average speed of the car for the entire three-hour trip was 65 kilometers per hour.
To find the average speed of the car for the entire three-hour trip, we need to use the formula:
Average speed = Total distance / Total time
Let's first calculate the total distance covered by the car:
Distance covered in the first hour = Average speed * Time = 85.5 km/h * 1 h = 85.5 km
Distance covered in the next two hours = Average speed * Time = 55.5 km/h * 2 h = 111 km
Total distance covered by the car = 85.5 km + 111 km = 196.5 km
Now, let's calculate the total time taken by the car:
Total time taken by the car = 1 h + 2 h = 3 h
Finally, we can calculate the average speed of the car:
Average speed = Total distance / Total time = 196.5 km / 3 h = 65 km/h
Therefore, the average speed of the car for the entire three-hour trip was 65 kilometers per hour.
Know more about average speed here:
https://brainly.com/question/29265544
#SPJ11
Consider the DE. (e ^x siny+tany)dx+(e^x cosy+xsec 2 y)dy== the the General solution is: a. None of these b. e ^x sin(y)−xtan(y)=0 c. e^x sin(y)+xtan(y)=0 d. e ^xsin(y)+tan(y)=C
The general solution to the differential equation is given by: e^x sin y + xtan y = C, where C is a constant. the correct answer is option (b) e^x sin(y) − xtan(y) = 0.
To solve the differential equation (e^x sin y + tan y)dx + (e^x cos y + x sec^2 y)dy = 0, we first need to check if it is exact by confirming if M_y = N_x. We have:
M = e^x sin y + tan y
N = e^x cos y + x sec^2 y
Differentiating M with respect to y, we get:
M_y = e^x cos y + sec^2 y
Differentiating N with respect to x, we get:
N_x = e^x cos y + sec^2 y
Since M_y = N_x, the equation is exact. We can now find a potential function f(x,y) such that df/dx = M and df/dy = N. Integrating M with respect to x, we get:
f(x,y) = ∫(e^x sin y + tan y) dx = e^x sin y + xtan y + g(y)
Taking the partial derivative of f(x,y) with respect to y and equating it to N, we get:
∂f/∂y = e^x cos y + xtan^2 y + g'(y) = e^x cos y + x sec^2 y
Comparing coefficients, we get:
g'(y) = 0
xtan^2 y = xsec^2 y
The second equation simplifies to tan^2 y = sec^2 y, which is true for all y except when y = nπ/2, where n is an integer. Hence, the general solution to the differential equation is given by:
e^x sin y + xtan y = C, where C is a constant.
Therefore, the correct answer is option (b) e^x sin(y) − xtan(y) = 0.
Learn more about equation from
https://brainly.com/question/29174899
#SPJ11
(2) [5{pt}] (a) (\sim 2.1 .8{a}) Let x, y be rational numbers. Prove that x y, x-y are rational numbers. (Hint: Start by writing x=\frac{m}{n}, y=\frac{k}{l}
If x and y are rational numbers, then the product xy and the difference x-y are also rational numbers.
To prove that the product xy and the difference x-y of two rational numbers x and y are also rational numbers, we can start by expressing x and y as fractions.
Let x = m/n and
y = k/l, where m, n, k, and l are integers and n and l are non-zero.
Product of xy:
The product of xy is given by:
xy = (m/n) * (k/l)
= (mk) / (nl)
Since mk and nl are both integers and nl is non-zero, the product xy can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, making it a rational number.
Difference of x-y:
The difference of x-y is given by:
x - y = (m/n) - (k/l)
= (ml - nk) / (nl)
Since ml - nk and nl are both integers and nl is non-zero, the difference x-y can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, making it a rational number.
Therefore, we have shown that both the product xy and the difference x-y of two rational numbers x and y are rational numbers.
If x and y are rational numbers, then the product xy and the difference x-y are also rational numbers.
To know more about Rational Numbers, visit
brainly.com/question/12088221
#SPJ11
A random sample of 200 marathon runners were surveyed in March 2018 and asked about how often they did a full practice schedule in the week before a scheduled marathon. In this survey, 75%(95%Cl70−77%) stated that they did not run a full practice schedule in the week before their competition. A year later, in March 2019, the same sample group were surveyed and 61%(95%Cl57−64%) stated that they did not run a full practice schedule in the week before their competition. These results suggest: Select one: a. There was no statistically significant change in the completion of full practice schedules between March 2018 and March 2019. b. We cannot say whether participation in full practice schedules has changed. c. The participation in full practice schedules demonstrated a statistically significant decrease between March 2018 and March 2019. d. We cannot say whether the completion of full practice schedules changed because the sample is of only 200 marathon runners.
Option D, "We cannot say whether the completion of full practice schedules changed because the sample is of only 200 marathon runners," is incorrect.
The participation in full practice schedules demonstrated a statistically significant decrease between March 2018 and March 2019. A random sample of 200 marathon runners was surveyed in March 2018 and March 2019 to determine how often they did a full practice schedule in the week before their scheduled marathon.
In the March 2018 survey, 75%(95%Cl70−77%) of the sample did not complete a full practice schedule in the week before their scheduled marathon.
A year later, in March 2019, the same sample group was surveyed, and 61%(95%Cl57−64%) stated that they did not run a full practice schedule in the week before their competition.
The results suggest that participation in full practice schedules has decreased significantly between March 2018 and March 2019.
The reason why we know that there was a statistically significant decrease is that the confidence interval for the 2019 survey did not overlap with the confidence interval for the 2018 survey.
Because the confidence intervals do not overlap, we can conclude that there was a significant change in the completion of full practice schedules between March 2018 and March 2019.
Therefore, option C, "The participation in full practice schedules demonstrated a statistically significant decrease between March 2018 and March 2019," is the correct answer.
The sample size of 200 marathon runners is adequate to draw a conclusion since the sample was drawn at random. Therefore, option D, "We cannot say whether the completion of full practice schedules changed because the sample is of only 200 marathon runners," is incorrect.
To know more about confidence intervals visit:
brainly.com/question/32546207
#SPJ11
