In the situation that has been shown above, it may be stated that the Paco will be able to rescind the contract, because Roy should have known about the erroneous price of the product, is the most likely outcome. Therefore, the option A holds true.
When the contract has essentials that are completely erroneous, then the party to the contract has the option to rescind or abstain from fulfilling the contents of the contract, as the contract becomes voidable at the end of the discretion of the party related thereto.
Learn more about contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
Complete question
Paco Corp., a building contractor, offered to sell Roy several pieces of used construction equipment. Roy, engaged in the business of buying and selling equipment, accepted the offer. Paco's written offer had been prepared by a secretary who typed the total price as $10,900, rather than $109,000, which was the approximate fair market value of the equipment. Paco learned of the error in the offer and refused delivery of the equipment unless Roy agreed to pay $109,000. Roy has sued Paco for breach of contract. Which of the following scenarios is the likely outcome?
Paco will be able to rescind the contract because Roy should have known that the price was erroneous.
Paco will not be liable because there has been a mutual mistake of fact.
true or false,a citation identifies the publication in which a legal authority can be found.
Answer:
It is TRUE a citation identifies the publication in which a legal authority can be found.
Explanation:
You're welcome.
The given statement, "a citation identifies the publication in which a legal authority can be found," is true (T) because it is indeed used to support a particular legal argument or claim.
A citation is a reference to a specific source, such as a book, article, or other publication, that is used to support an argument or claim. In the context of legal research, a citation is used to identify the legal authority that supports a particular legal argument or claim. The citation typically includes the name of the publication, the volume number, the page number, and the year of publication.
By providing a citation, a researcher or legal professional can help others find the legal authority that they are referring to, and can also help ensure that their argument or claim is supported by reliable and authoritative sources.
Learn more about citation brainly.com/question/28365429
#SPJ11
If you were one of the legislators during the debate over the Bill, would you support or oppose the Bill? Why or why not?
If I was one of the legislators during a debate over the bill I would certainly support a bill after addressing all its advantages only.
Like all the legislators debate on the bills present in the houses and considering the facts, advantages and disadvantages decide whether to support a bill or not, I will adopt the same procedure. A bill is a proposed legislation proposed by a legislature in front of a senate, which further debates and address such bills and then the process of voting is done where the members of the houses either accept or oppose the bills. The senate with at least one third of votes can ratify the bill. If both the House and Senate pass the same bill then it is sent to the President. If the House and Senate pass different bills they are sent to Conference Committee. Most major legislation goes to a Conference Committee. A bill when signed by the president becomes a law.
Know more about "bill" visit
brainly.com/question/1163954
#SPJ4
Which U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power? a. Fourth b. Sixth c. Tenth d. Fourteenth.
The tenth U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power.
What is plenary power?
According to US constitutional law, plenary power is one that has been granted to an entity or individual in full, without being subject to scrutiny or restrictions on how it may be used. When a plenary authority is given to one body, all other bodies lose their ability to use it if they are not otherwise entitled. Judicial review of plenary powers is not permitted, either in a specific situation or generally.
Due to the nature of the Constitution, which assigns distinct but occasionally overlapping functions to the three parts of the federal government and the states, there are very few glaring examples of such powers in the United States.
To learn more about plenary power visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30653314
#SPJ4
the policy which sought to remove native americans from territories they had lived in for generations was known as
The Indian Removal Act was a strategy that aimed to drive aboriginal Americans off of the lands they had inhabited for many centuries.
On May 28, 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law, giving him the power to award territory west of the Mississippi River in return for Indian holdings that were already inside current state limits. A few tribes left peacefully, but the relocation policy was contested by the majority.
As the population of the United States increased, the federal government wanted to evict Native People to make room for the western expansion in this territories. The era's governmental objectives centered on evicting Native Americans from Indian Country and relocating them westward past the Mississippi River.
Learn more about territories Visit: brainly.com/question/18234493
#SPJ4
Answer:
Indian Removal
Explanation:
I took the K12 quiz
Concerns relationships between individuals or between individuals and the governmenta)criminal lawb)civil lawc)international lawd)military law
Out of the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the Civil Law is the one that takes care of the concerns of the relationships that exist between the individuals or individuals and the government. Therefore, the option B holds true.
The civil law may be taken into interpretation or consideration as the type of law that brings into account the matters related to the disputes or concerns related to the individuals and civilians of the country, and also provides a number of protections and regulations being made thereunder.
Learn more about civil law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ4
Concerns relationships between individuals or between individuals and the government
a)criminal law
b)civil law
c)international law
d)military law
you have _____days to file a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission after the alleged incident.
You have 180 days from the alleged incident to submit a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission.
You must lodge a complaint or request an investigation 180 days after the alleged act of discrimination or retaliation, so keep that in mind. An EEOC office near you can accept written complaints or ones made in person.
Calling the EEOC at 1-800-669-4000 or visiting the EEOC's Field Office List and Jurisdiction Map and choosing the office closest to you can help you locate the nearest EEOC office. The appropriate internal complaints committee or the local complaints committee must receive this complaint within three months of the incident.
Learn more about employment Visit: brainly.com/question/29318513
#SPJ4
Which of the following is essential to the success of law reform efforts?
O Advocacy
O Deposition
O Litigation
O Naturalization
Advocacy is essential to the success of law reform efforts. The process of analysing present laws and pushing for change is known as law reform or legal reform.
Law reform, sometimes known as legal reform, is the process of analysing current laws, proposing change, and putting such change into effect in the legal system, usually with the goal of improving justice or efficiency.
Law reform commissions or bodies, which are institutions created to support law reform, are closely connected. Aiming to modernise and simplify the law, law reform organisations do research and make recommendations. Although many law reform organisations are statutory businesses created by governments, they are typically free from official oversight, giving them the intellectual independence to objectively consider and communicate how the law should advance.
To learn more about law reform visit;
https://brainly.com/question/24783165
#SPJ1
you have _____days to file a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission after the alleged incident.
You have 180 days in order to file a complaint with the help of equal employment opportunity and commission after applying the alleged incident.
Claimants have 180 days from the date of the claimed incidence to submit an EEOC complaint. Similar to the EEOC, the claimant has 180 days from the moment the EEOC receives the complaint to file a lawsuit once the EEOC has finished its investigation. After the claimed incident, you have 180 days to file a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission.
After the discrimination occurred, you have six months plus one day to file a lawsuit. It is not sufficient to just post your claim; the court must have received it before the deadline. An EEOC office near you can accept written or in-person complaints regarding employment discrimination.
Learn more about employment Visit: brainly.com/question/29318513
#SPJ4
which amendments address the rights of the accused? a) The fourth amandement. b) The fifth amandement. c) The sixth amandement. d) The seventh amandement
The sixth amendment of the constitution of United States address the rights of the accused.
Hence, the correct option is C.
The amendment was ratified in houses in the year 1791 by the required three-fourths majority of states, and the 6th amendment of the constitution of United States protects the rights of the criminal defendants or accused. It includes the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know about accused and the nature of the charges and evidence against the accused. It addresses an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.
To know more about "sixth amendment" visit-
brainly.com/question/3044508
#SPJ4
What are the reasons grandparents can file for custody of grandchild ?
Grandparents can file for custody of grandchild because when parents are not able to take care of their child then grandparents can take custody.
There are many reasons grandparents can file petition for custody of grandchild. Maybe the guardians can't deal with the kid, or perhaps there has been a sensational change in the family circumstance that leaves the kid without a home.Anything that the explanation, grandparents have lawful privileges with regards to looking for care of their grandkids.
The five reason why grandparents can file for custody of grandchild
#1. The grandparent is the most proper parental figure:
At times, a grandparent might be the most fitting and cherishing guardian for their grandkid because of reasons like age, monetary steadiness, or family ancestry
#2. The guardians can't give sufficient consideration:
Now and again, the parent or guardians might not be able or reluctant to give appropriate consideration and thoughtfulness regarding their kid. This could be because of medication or liquor misuse, psychological instability, or detainment.
#3. The guardians are perished or missing:
In the sad instance of a parent's demise or long haul nonappearance because of reasons, for example, military help, it very well might be vital for a grandparent to petition for care of their grandkid.
#4. The guardians can't give monetarily to the kid:
At times, the parent or guardians might not be able to give monetarily to their kid because of joblessness or an absence of assets and dependability. For this situation, a grandparent might petition for care of their grandkid to give a superior life to them.
#5. The guardians have dismissed their parental obligations:
Now and again, the parent or guardians might have disregarded their parental obligations because of compulsion or psychological sickness.
To know more about custody,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/28746551
#SPJ4
federal inmates are required to serve what percentage of their sentences
Federal inmates are required to serve a minimum of 85% of their sentences.
A federal prison refers to a prison which is operated under the jurisdiction of a federal government as opposed to a state or provincial body. Hence, federal inmates are the inmates incarcerated in a federal prison convicted for violating federal law and for inmates who are considered dangerous or sentenced to longer terms of imprisonment.
Federal inmates are required to serve a minimum of 85% of their sentences. This means that if an inmate is sentenced to 10 years in prison, they must serve at least 8.5 years before being eligible for release. This requirement is set by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which are designed to ensure that all federal inmates serve a consistent percentage of their sentences. The goal of this requirement is to promote fairness and consistency in the federal criminal justice system.
Learn more about Federal Sentencing Guidelines:
https://brainly.com/question/28156579
#SPJ11
what term is used to describe an employment practice that lacks discriminatory content but still leads to discrimination?
The law of superposition is a geologic principle used to determine the ______________
The law of superposition is a geologic principle used to determine the relative ages of rock strata, or layers.
Superposition is one of the basis of science of geology, the major principle of stratigraphy stating the layers of the sediment placed in accordance with their age. The law of superposition is based on theory that the youngest rock are always on top and the oldest rock always lies in the bottom. Using this principle, geologists were able to determine which rock layers were the oldest long before the technology existed to calculate the absolute ages of rocks. This principle was considered a great milestone in the field of geology propounded by geologist Nicolaus Steno in the 16th century.
To know more about "law of superposition" visit-
brainly.com/question/12493909
#SPJ4
what happens if you unknowingly deposit a fake check
You can be responsible for the money on a fake check if you deposit it. Additionally, you could be held accountable for any losses the bank might suffer as a result of your deposit.
The Repercussions Of Accidentally Depositing A Fake Check:
If you have a bank account, you'll probably be assessed an overdraft fee. You will be charged by the bank for the amount the bogus cheque overdrew. The cost of an overdraft may be in the thousands.If you are dismissed as a result of this, you can lose your job.When you are ready to apply for new loans and mortgages, it will have an impact on your credit record.The individual who wrote the check and lost money as a result of your placement of a phony check into their account may also be entitled to reimbursement from you. Restitution can be costly to pay back in order to make things right with that individual once more.To learn more about fake checks visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30227381
#SPJ4
what controubted to rise of dual federalism
Answer:
The rise of dual federalism in the United States was largely the result of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which outlined a system of government with separate powers and responsibilities for the federal government and the states. This system was further strengthened by the 10th Amendment, which clarified that all powers not explicitly delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states. This created a balance of power between the two levels of government, with the federal government having control over issues that affected the entire nation and the states having control over more localized matters. This system of dual federalism ensured that both levels of government would have a role to play in the United States.
Answer:
Dual federalism, also known as layer cake federalism, is a political arrangement in which the power of the federal government and state governments are clearly defined and separated. The rise of dual federalism can be attributed to several factors, including:
The U.S. Constitution: The Constitution outlines the division of power between the federal government and the states, with the federal government having specific, enumerated powers and the states having residual powers. This division of power helped to establish the framework for dual federalism.
The Marshall Court: The Marshall Court, in several landmark cases such as Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland, established the principle of judicial review and solidified the power of the federal government.
The Civil War: The Civil War settled the issue of states' rights and reinforced the power of the federal government, further solidifying the principles of dual federalism.
The Progressive Era: The Progressive Era saw a rise in activism and a call for greater regulation of business, which led to a growth in federal power. This increased federal power helped to further establish dual federalism as the dominant system of government in the United States.
Explanation:
Overall, the rise of dual federalism was due to a combination of constitutional principles, judicial decisions, and historical events that helped to establish and reinforce the division of power between the federal government and state governments.
ALLEN
PAHELP PO PLS. NEED NG EXAMPLE EACH
1. Existence and territorial extent of states
EXAMPLE:
2. Political history of states
EXAMPLE:
3. Forms of government and symbols of nationality
EXAMPLE:
4. Law of nations
EXAMPLE:
5. Admiralty and maritime courts of the world and their seals
EXAMPLE:
6. Political constitution and history of the Philippines
EXAMPLE:
7. Official acts of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of the Philippines
EXAMPLE:
8. Laws of nature
EXAMPLE:
9. Measure of time
EXAMPLE:
10. Geographical divisions
EXAMPLE:
1. Existence and territorial extent of states:
Example: The United States of America is a sovereign state located in North America with a territorial extent that includes 50 states, the District of Columbia, and various other territories and possessions.
2. Political history of states:
Example: The political history of the United Kingdom includes the reigns of various monarchs, the establishment of the parliamentary system, and the formation of the British Empire.
3. Forms of government and symbols of nationality:
Example: The government of Japan is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system, and its national symbols include the flag, anthem, and imperial crest.
4. Law of nations:
Example: The law of nations, also known as international law, governs the relations between nations and includes treaties, customs, and general principles of law.
5. Admiralty and maritime courts of the world and their seals:
Example: The United States has admiralty and maritime courts, which are specialized courts that hear cases related to maritime law, and their seals typically include an anchor or ship motif.
6. Political constitution and history of the Philippines:
Example: The political constitution of the Philippines is a presidential representative democratic republic, and its history includes periods of Spanish and American colonization as well as a struggle for independence.
7. Official acts of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of the Philippines:
Example: The official acts of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the Philippines include the passage of laws, the issuance of executive orders, and the rendering of judicial decisions.
8. Laws of nature:
Example: The laws of nature are scientific principles that describe the behavior of the physical world, such as the laws of gravity, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism.
9. Measure of time:
Example: The measure of time includes units such as seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, and years, which are used to quantify the duration of events and the passage of time.
10. Geographical divisions:
Example: Geographical divisions include various types of landforms, such as continents, countries, regions, states, provinces, cities, and bodies of water, which are used to describe and organize the Earth's surface.
What are the different forms of government and how do they differ from each other?The main forms of government are democracy, monarchy, dictatorship, and oligarchy. They differ in terms of who holds power, how decisions are made, and the degree of citizen participation.
To know more about Sovereign visit:
brainly.com/question/30500362
#SPJ1
according to the rule of law a government leader: a) is excluded from "we the people". b) Has absolute authority to make decisions for everyone. c) Must follow the law like everyone else.
According to the rule of law a government leader must follow the law like everyone else.
Hence. the correct option is C.
Rule of law is the mechanism or a norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power. The constitution protects persons rights and the rule of law describes constitution as the source of law, each law is derived from the constitution and it cannot override the general provisions of the constitution. The three major elements of rule of law are supremacy of law, equality to everyone before law and predominance of law i.e. court should be free from external influence.
To know more about "rule of law " visit-
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
t/f because the amendment process is so cumbersome, only 27 constitutional amendments have ever been proposed
False. Only 27 constitutional modifications have ever been proposed due to the difficult amendment process. Due to Informal Modifications and how much simpler it is to alter something informally than formally.
The Constitution's drafters provide a method for amending it: Hence it might alter along with civilization. The amendment's backers reasoned that lawmakers are more likely to exercise caution when voting to increase congressional salary if they have no personal stake in the outcome.
James Madison proposed the amendment to Congress in 1789, and at that time it was sent to the states for ratification. Amendments are difficult to pass since just thirteen states can prevent their acceptance (in either of their two chambers) of any amendment.
Learn more about amendments Visit: brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ4
Does USA regulate e-waste?
Yes,USA regulate e-waste.Out of 50 states,25 states have instituted electronic waste.
The US doesn't have an authority government e-waste regulation system, yet certain states have carried out state administrative frameworks. The Public Methodology for Electronic waste regulation was helped to establish by the Natural Security Office (EPA), the Board on Natural Quality (CEQ), and the General Administrations Organization (GSA), and was acquainted in 2011 with center around government activity to lay out electronic stewardship in the Assembled States.
E-waste management is basic because of the poisonous synthetic compounds present in electronic gadgets. As indicated by the US EPA, poisonous substances like lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium are frequently delivered into the climate and imperil entire networks; these harmful toxins can inconveniently affect the wellbeing of biological systems and living organisms. US e-waste board incorporates reusing and reuse programs, homegrown landfill unloading, and global shipments of locally created e-squander. The EPA gauges that in 2009, the US discarded 2.37 million tons of e-squander, 25% of which was reused locally.
To know more about e-waste,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/3839438
#SPJ4
One way that the English Bill of Rights expanded on the Magna Carta was by stating that the monarch must have Parliament's consent to levy taxes. True/False?
The given statement "One way that the English Bill of Rights expanded on the Magna Carta was by stating that the monarch must have Parliament's consent to levy taxes." is True.
Because, it was added to limit the powers of the monarch in order to prevent the imposition of heavy and excessive taxes and fines by the monarch.
The concept of divine rights was challenged by magna carta because it gives rights to the common people which were solely held by the monarch. Later on, the concept of limiting the powers of the monarch was known as Constitutional monarchy.
To know more about magna carta, click here: brainly.com/question/572543
#SPJ4
Munten Company's management derives four estimates relating to the possible tax benefit of its tax position. The amount that Munten should recognize relating to this potential tax benefit is the
The largest amount with a cumulative greater than 50 percent chance of realization is the amount that is to be recognized as being in relation to the potential tax benefit for Munten.
The tax benefit may be taken into interpretation as the benefit that an individual derives from the payment or nonpayment of taxes within the stipulated time of the previous year during the time of assessment being made in the context of the same. In the above situation, the largest amount is the amount to be considered for tax benefit.
Learn more about tax benefits here:
https://brainly.com/question/1581158
#SPJ4
Japan would restrict emmigration of laborers to the US is part of what agreement?
Japan would restrict immigration of laborers to the US is part of Gentlemen's Agreement.
The Gentlemen's Agreement was a series of informal and nonbinding agreement between japan and the United State in the year 1907 under which Japanese government agreed to voluntarily restrict issuing passports for immigration, good for the continental United States to laborers while the US government promised to protect the rights of Japanese immigrants and their children already residing in the United States. The major aim of the agreement was to calm down immigration issues and war like conditions between the two countries. However, it was later nullified due to criticism from public by the US Immigration Act 1924.
To know more about "Gentlemen's Agreement" visit-
brainly.com/question/13876722
#SPJ4
A bakery negotiated with a supplier regarding a long-term commitment to supply flour. They agreed to specific terms to be memorialized in a written contract. Due to an oversight, the supplier never signed the written contract, although it began providing flour to the bakery under the terms of their agreement. Six months later, the price of flour rose dramatically following a nationwide drought. The supplier, realizing that it had never signed the contract, told the bakery that it would have to charge a higher price for the flour. The bakery properly filed a complaint in federal district court, alleging that the flour supplier had breached their contract. The flour supplier filed an answer in which it denied the factual allegations in the complaint regarding the price and duration of the contract, but did not raise any affirmative defenses. The following day, the flour supplier filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the oral contract between the parties violated the Statute of Frauds.
Can the court grant the defendant's motion to dismiss?
Yes, because the answer denied the factual allegations regarding the terms of the contract.
Yes, because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
No, because the defendant waived any objection on the pleadings by filing an answer.
No, because the defendant did not assert a defense based on the Statute of Frauds in its answer.
In the above court case, it may be stated that the court may grant the defendant's motion to dismiss, since the complaint had failed to state a claim upon which there can be a claim being relieved. Therefore, the option B holds true.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints being filed over which a claim can also be made, it automatically applies to the doctrine of granting a motion to dismiss for the defendant, according to the essentials of the law.
Learn more about motion here:
brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
The Smith system does not include
Hope it helps
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote
The implementation of the antitrust laws has been made by the government in order to lead a promotion of competition in the markets.
The antitrust laws are the laws that are brought into enforcement in order to bring regulations of competitiveness among the sellers in the market during a given particular period of time in an economy. In fact, the entire construction of these laws has been built around the regulations related to the market competition, and provides protection against unfair advantages to the sellers.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ4
Complete question
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote ______
2. Pilihan ganda30 detik1 ptQ. Of the following, the most significant difference between the Constitution of 1787 and the Articles of Confederation was that the ConstitutionPilihan jawabanmade states sovereign over the national government, while the Articles were based on national sovereignty.was difficult to amend, while the Articles included an easier process requiring approval by a simple majority of states.created a dominant national executive, while the Articles established a dominant national legislature.provided for a strong national government with many powers, while the Articles created a weak central government with few independent powers.
Option 3 is Correct. The creation of a strong national executive by the Constitution of 1787 as opposed to a dominant national legislature by the Articles of Confederation was the key distinction between the two documents.
In the end, the biggest difference between America's two founding documents is that under the Articles, state sovereignty predominated, whereas under the Constitution, after it was approved, the federal government's authority was greatly expanded.
The most significant distinction between these two treaties was that whereas the Constitution established a powerful central authority, the Articles of Confederation provided a central government relatively limited power. The Declaration of Independence served as a justification for leaving a government. A government was intended to be established by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Constitution Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Of the following, the most significant difference between the Constitution of 1787 and the Articles of Confederation was that the Constitution
answer choices
1. made states sovereign over the national government, while the Articles were based on national sovereignty.
2. was difficult to amend, while the Articles included an easier process requiring approval by a simple majority of states.
3. created a dominant national executive, while the Articles established a dominant national legislature.
4. provided for a strong national government with many powers, while the Articles created a weak central government with few independent powers.
an attorney making an opening statement might typically include___.
Typically, an opening statement by an attorney will include a concise summary of the relevant facts and supporting documentation.
A brief explanation of the relevant law and a request for a verdict is typically included in an opening statement. The lawyer describes the requested verdict in the motion for the verdict as well as the supporting evidence. An effective opening statement acts as the trial's route map.
Each side's attorneys are given the opportunity to introduce themselves and the other parties engaged in the case during opening comments. In order to help the jury comprehend the evidence that will be given during the trial, attorneys typically summarise the key details of the case during the opening statement.
To learn more about opening statement visit;
https://brainly.com/question/10956209
#SPJ4
Newberry Corp. has pretax accounting income of $100,000. Newberry has tax depreciation in excess of financial accounting depreciation of $20,000. Bad debt expense on the income statement was $5,000, and bad debts for tax reporting was $2,000. The enacted tax rate is 40%. Which of the following entries will be included in the journal entry to record income tax at year-end? (Select all that apply.)
The correct answer to this question is:
A debit to Income Tax Expense for $47,200
A credit to Income Tax Payable for $47,200
To calculate the income tax expense that will be included in the year-end journal entry, we need to first calculate the taxable income.
Taxable income = Accounting income + tax depreciation - tax-deductible expenses
In this case, taxable income is:
= $100,000 + $20,000 - $2,000
= $118,000
The income tax expense can be calculated as:
Income tax expense = taxable income x tax rate
= $118,000 x 40%
= $47,200
So the journal entry to record income tax at year-end will include:
A debit to Income Tax Expense for $47,200
A credit to Income Tax Payable for $47,200
For such more question on tax:
https://brainly.com/question/26316390
#SPJ4
Referring to the principles pf proportionality, targeting and consistency of approach within the enforcement policy statement. what will the enforcement agency have considered when deciding on this enforcement action? NEBOSH DIPLOMA
When deciding on an enforcement action, an enforcement agency would consider the following:
Proportionality: The enforcement agency would ensure that the action taken is proportional to the seriousness of the offense. The action taken should not be more severe than necessary to achieve the desired result. The agency will consider the gravity of the offense, the harm caused, the culpability of the offender, and the public interest in taking action.Targeting: The enforcement agency would ensure that the action taken is directed at the appropriate offender. The agency will consider factors such as the risk posed by the offender, their previous conduct, the level of cooperation with the agency, and the need to deter others from committing similar offenses.Consistency of approach: The enforcement agency would ensure that the action taken is consistent with its policies and previous enforcement actions. The agency will consider the nature of the offense, the context in which it was committed, and any relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances.Overall, the enforcement agency will need to balance the principles of proportionality, targeting, and consistency of approach when deciding on an enforcement action. It will need to take into account all relevant factors and circumstances and ensure that the action taken is both fair and effective in achieving its enforcement objectives.
Which of these descriptions is consistent with the federal system?Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters. A confederal system of government. The colonies had no formal venue for influencing parliamentary policy. Confederal system
The descriptions that is consistent with the federal system A. Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters.
What is the most accurate way to define a federal system?A federal government is a system in which local state governments that are interconnected with the national government and a central national government share power. The national government has power over some aspects of public life, while local governments have control over other aspects.
In federal systems, political power is split between two independent, directly elected sets of governments, one national and the other subnational.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about federal system at:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
#SPJ1
