Texas's handgun laws have been passed in the following chronological order:
1. Concealed carry.
2. Barriers to employer prohibition.
3. Weapons kept in vehicles parked in private lots.
4. Campus carry and open carry
Concealed carry, also referred to as carrying a concealed weapon, is the act of carrying a weapon so as to hide or conceal its presence from observers. This can be carried out in open spaces, on or close to one person. The weapons can be used for self-defense only.
A concealed weapon is any deadly object, such as a gun, that is carried by or close to a person but is kept out of plain sight of other people.
To learn more about Handguns in Texas,
https://brainly.com/question/29833583
#SPJ4
When the American colonists declared independence in 1776, what principle did they argue that Britain had violated?
Legally binding
Magna Carta
Precedent decision
Social contract
The American colonists argued that Britain had violated the principle of "no taxation without representation" in their declaration of independence in 1776.
Who are the American colonists?Generally, In 1776, American colonists proclaimed their independence:
The Declaration of Independence of 1776 The Affirmation of Autonomy, which was signed by the 13 American colonies and ratified by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, marked the end of their political relationship with Extraordinary Britain.
The colonists' reasons for wanting independence were encapsulated in the Affirmation. By proclaiming themselves a free nation, the American colonists were able to forge a formal alliance with the French government and secure French support in their conflict with Incredible Britain.
Unified Statement of Independence Throughout the 1760s and the beginning of the 1770s, the colonists in North America came into growing conflict with the ideas of the British royal family on taxes and wilderness management.
When repeated protests failed to change British policy and instep led to the closing of Boston's port and the proclamation of martial rule in Massachusetts, the colonial governments sent delegates to a Mainland Congress to urge a colony boycott of British products.
Read more about American colonists
https://brainly.com/question/15899289
#SPJ1
You are on patrol as a cop, you see a known gang member's pink 4-door Sedan. It was used in the murder of another police officer. How do you react in this situation?
You are on patrol as a cop, you see a known gang member's pink 4-door Sedan. It was used in the murder of another police officer. I will call the remaining police force and silently try to arrest them.
What is police?A police is a body of officers created by the government for maintaining law and order, safety of the people, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities.
The police also known as cops do patrolling in different different areas which are sensitive and are prone to crimes.
If police find the suspect or anything that is related to a crime, the police have the authority to take it under their control.
Learn more about police here:
https://brainly.com/question/17882701
#SPJ1
The international tax code affects the United States economy. In this discussion, you will comment onthe complexity of the tax code and how the international tax code interacts with the U.S. tax code.It was mentioned in our textbook that Pam Olson, former Treasury Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy, wasquoted as saying, "It is difficult to predict the future of an economy in which it takes more brains tofigure out the tax on our income than it does to earn it." ReadTestimony of Pamela Olson Before theSenate Committee on Finance on International Tax Policy and Competitiveness, as well as the resourcearticleWhat Are the Consequences of the New US International Tax System?, and comment on yourexperience with the complexity of the tax code by addressing the following questions:Do you think that the new tax act helped or further complicated the tax code?
The international tax code tends to affects the United States economy. So, the new law also confers the enormous tax benefits which were on some industries but not others.
The international tax code which is seen to be administered by U.S. and the foreign governments can thus dramatically affect the business decision making, retention, job creation and plant location, also the competitiveness, and the long-term health of the U.S. economy.
However, the objective of the international taxation is in order to manage the cross overs which are considered of the national tax systems when they are said to be confronted with international transactions.
To learn more about taxation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1980107
#SPJ4
Gathering the facts and properly explaining them is an important component of accurate report writing. Explain why it is important to keep your emotional reactions and assumptions out of a law enforcement report.
Answer:
It is important to keep emotional reactions and assumptions out of a law enforcement report because it can lead to inaccurate information, which can lead to wrong decisions being made. Emotional reactions and assumptions are subjective and can lead to bias that can influence the accuracy of the report. Keeping emotions and assumptions out of the report helps to ensure that the report is as accurate and unbiased as possible. Additionally, it is important to keep emotions and assumptions out of a law enforcement report because it can be used as evidence in court proceedings. If emotions and assumptions are included in the report, it can be seen as unreliable and can be called into question in court. Therefore, it is important to keep emotions and assumptions out of a law enforcement report in order to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Explanation:
You buy Lil' John's CD and take it to a street corner and play it from a BoomBox and start dancing. The cops pull up and arrest you for copyright infringement. Can this happen? If it's illegal, how can so many people get away with it?
Answer: Copyright infringement is a serious offense and can result in fines, imprisonment, or both. Playing a CD in public without permission from the copyright holder is considered copyright infringement, and it is illegal. However, people get away with copyright infringement due to the difficulty of enforcement and the vastness of the internet. Copyright holders may not have the resources to pursue legal action against everyone who violates their copyright, and the sheer number of potential offenders makes it difficult to detect and stop all copyright infringement. Additionally, some people may not be aware that their actions constitute copyright infringement, which can make it difficult for copyright holders to take action.
The scandals and abuses of the Texas prison system led to the creation of aBlue Ribbon Committee on Prison Reform.Joint Committee on Prison Reform.general prison manager position.state prison board
In 1993, Texas made this lawful offense classification to alleviate stuffing in Texas detainment facilities and to keep peaceful guilty parties separate from vicious criminals with the desire to restore the peaceful guilty parties.
Normal time served expanded. The number of detainees in Texas penitentiaries expanded emphatically. The working expenses of Texas detainment facilities were almost multiple times higher in 2008 than in 1982.
Research shows that these sorts of projects diminish recidivism by 13%, decrease occurrence reports for detainee unfortunate behavior by 4%, and increment post-discharge work by 13%.
He supported a framework in which detainees were compensated for their appropriate conduct and could be delivered whenever they were transformed. This hypothesis eventually prompted the act of delivering detainees from the beginning of parole and giving convicts an uncertain sentence.
To learn more about Committee on Prisonhere here
https://brainly.com/question/30197136
#SPJ4
Referencing the scenario, describe the structural barrier to voting that is discussed above. Explain why the structural barrier described in part A may be more of an obstacle in some states than in others. If youth voter turnout increases as a result of the actions in the scenario, explain how this could affect the way candidates run campaigns in the future.
It is important to note that structural barriers to voting include laws, policies, and practices that make it difficult or impossible for certain groups of people to vote.
These barriers can vary by state and can be more of an obstacle in some states than in others. If youth voter turnout increases as a result of efforts to remove these barriers, it could lead to candidates running more youth-focused campaigns and addressing issues that are important to young voters in order to gain their support.
Structural barriers to voting refers to laws, policies, and practices that make it difficult or impossible for certain groups of people to vote. Examples include voter ID laws, gerrymandering, and limited polling hours. These barriers can vary by state and can be more of an obstacle for some groups of people than others. These barriers can suppress the voter turnout of certain groups and can have a negative impact on the democracy.
Learn more about vote here:
https://brainly.com/question/21093353
#SPJ4
A producer may NOT advertise an insurance product if he/she
A) publishes the ad in a trade journal.
B) points out differences with the competition.
C) uses a policy title to misrepresent the coverage.
D) uses a paid spokesperson.
A producer may not advertise an insurance product if he/she publishes the ad in a trade journal. The correct option is A.
What is the use of advertising to sell insurance?Your insurance company cannot survive without marketing. It is how you develop warm leads from cold calls and expand your company. A well-thought-out marketing plan aids in establishing and maintaining a clientele that comes to your agency first for their insurance requirements.
Producers of insurance are those who work in the insurance industry. The state in which an insurance producer sells insurance requires licensing. It might be necessary to pass a test or adhere to state-specific educational and/or ethical requirements.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about advertising here:
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
Writing Workshop: The Purpose Of Government
The purpose of government is to take care of the citizens of the nation and also ensure justice and tranquility in a country.
What is the purpose of the government?The purpose of government is to serve the needs and protect the rights of its citizens through the establishment of laws, policies and institutions that provide stability, security, and public services.
Governments also promote the general welfare, prosperity and development of their society, while balancing competing interests and promoting social justice.
The specific functions of government can vary widely depending on the political, social, and cultural context, but the general aim is to ensure the well-being and security of its citizens.
Read more on government here: https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast the consensus theory of justice and the conflict theory of justice. Show how these impact the subsystems of the criminal justice system.
Consensus theories of justice say that laws are created using the group rational to determine what behaviours are deviant and/or criminal to protect society from any harm. It argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system should work cooperatively to produce justice. They should not act or work competitively.
Conflict theory of justice, on the other hand, is a set of criminological theories that says that those in society who possess the social and economic power that is the ruling class, should define antisocial behaviour. It further says that antisocial behaviour results due class conflict and social and economic inequality existing in the society.
To know more about theory of justice refer to-
brainly.com/question/29454699#
#SPJ4
texas has ________ laws dealing with lobbying by former government officials.
One significant way for vested parties to get sufficiently close to those in government is to utilize previous authorities as lobbyists. Texas has solid regulations managing campaigning by previous government authorities.
Lobby- A vested party is coordinated to impact government choices, particularly regulation. To campaign is to endeavor to impact such choices. lobbyist. An individual endeavoring to impact government choices for the benefit of the gathering.
Terms here (24) How does "the entryway" in Texas contrast with that of numerous different states? It has serious areas of strength for moderate power.
A political activity board of trustees (PAC) is a confidential gathering that raises and disseminates assets for use in political races.
To learn more about the lobby here
https://brainly.com/question/14088008
#SPJ4
A broker prepared a sales contract for a buyer and a seller. The purchase was to be a loan assumption with the buyer putting down $30,000, a loan of $53,000 to be assumed and there was to be an earnest money deposit of $5,000. In his hurry to write the contract, the broker did not include a sale price on the contract. Which is true?
If a broker prepared a sales contract for a buyer and a seller. If in his hurry to write the contract, the broker did not include a sale price on the contract. The statement that is true is: The contract is not enforceable because of the Statute of Frauds.
What is contract?Contract can be defined as a form of agreement between two people or two or more parties in which the parties involved in the contract must abide to the term and condition of the contract.
Based on the scenario the contract is not enforceable due to the Statute of Frauds and the statue of fraud arise because the broker did not include a sale price on the contract.
Therefore this contract is not enforceable.
Learn more about contract here:https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
which of the following statements is not true?a.it is against the law to sell alcohol to anyone under the age of 21.b.it is against the law to use a false identification card to purchase alcohol.c.it is against the law to buy or consume alcohol when you're under the age of 21.d.it is against the law to be in an establishment that serves alcohol unless you're 21.
The following statement "it is against the law to be in an establishment that serves alcohol unless you're 21" is False.
Alcohol, also known as ethanol in chemical terms, is a depressant substance that is the primary component of alcoholic beverages including beer, wine, and distilled spirits. It is one of the oldest and most popular recreational substances, producing effects similar to those of alcohol intoxication.
Alcohol has a number of negative effects on the body, including euphoria and happiness, reduced anxiety, an increase in sociability, drowsiness, impairment of cognitive, memory, motor, and sensory function, and overall depression of central nervous system (CNS) function. Isopropanol is just slightly more poisonous than ethanol, so a modest, momentary exposure is unlikely to have a negative impact.
Hence the correct option is D
To know more about Alcohol here-
https://brainly.com/question/4698220
#SPJ4
Explain the differences between Act, Ordinance and Enactment; and what is the process of bill become law.
The basic difference between Acts, Ordinances, and Enactment is how they are getting implemented.
A 'bill ' can be contemplated as the initial stage of an act. It is a proposal to draft a new law. Generally, a bill is in the form of a document that summarizes what is the policy behind the suggested law and what the said law is going to be.
Once the Bill has been passed by the legislature, it is sent to the President or the Governor in case of Central law or State law respectively for approval. After receiving the Presidential assent, it becomes an Act.
The word 'law' generally refers to the set of regulations or rules to be followed. It can be in any form such as an act, ordinance, order, by-laws, rule or regulation, etc.
The ordinance is a temporary law that is circulated by the President on the recommendation of the Union Cabinet.
When any Act is introduced and passed, it is not mandatory that it is a complete code in itself. So, there is a requirement for the enactment of rules for defining the procedures of performing and implementing of the Act.
Basically, rules and regulations are quite similar, however, regulations are more rigid than rules. Regulations have a force of law as these are the orders passed by the Executive authority on the conduct of any legislation.
Process of making the bill a law:
Step 1: The bill is drafted.
Step 2: The bill is introduced.
Step 3: The bill goes to the committee.
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill.
Step 5: The committee marks up the bill.
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill.
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber.
Step 8: The bill goes to the president. President verifies it signing it to make it a law.
Learn more about Governor,
https://brainly.com/question/2279054
Read the excerpt from the prologue of Romeo and Juliet. Chorus: Two households, both alike in dignity, In fair Verona, where we lay our scene, From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean. Which words are connotations of the underlined word
Words which are connotations of the underlined word are resentment, bitterness.
In addition to its explicit or precise meaning, which is its denotation, a connotation is a generally accepted cultural or emotional association that every particular word or phrase possesses. The term "connotation" has a variety of meanings.
These might include contrasting the fundamental, literal meaning of a word or phrase with what that word or phrase explicitly signifies. Connotation refers to how anything may be connected with a word or phrase. Connotation is approximately equivalent with intention in logic and semantics. Connotation is sometimes contrasted with denotation, which is equivalent with extension.
To know more about Connotations here-
https://brainly.com/question/16701112
#SPJ4
Political campaign Finance their expenditures using hard and soft money match each term to its description
Hard money and soft money are terms used in campaign finance to describe different types of donations.
Hard money refers to donations that are used directly to support or oppose candidates for federal office. Federal law limits how much money a cash donor can donate and what it can be used for.
Soft money, on the other hand, represents donations made outside federal borders to state or local candidates and political parties, or to external advocacy groups.
Learn more about hard money and soft money;
https://brainly.com/question/10707723
The correct question may be:
Political campaigns finance their expenditures using hard and soft money. Match each term to its description.
Hard MoneySoft MoneyLegal contributions by individual donors of up to $5,000 to one candidate. The contributions are regulated by the amended Federal Election Campaign Act.Money raised to use indirectly to help with party-building activities. These contributions are not regulated by the Federal Election Commission.
Which of the following clauses serves as the constitutional basis for the federal Real ID Act of 2005, a law that established uniform standards for state-issued identification cards and provided regulation of a state function?
answer choices
The due process clause
The establishment clause
The necessary and proper clause
The commerce clause
Answer:
The commerce clause serves as the constitutional basis for the federal Real ID Act of 2005.
Explanation:
In September 2021, Alina borrowed RM5,000 from Baba to purchase a laptop. Alina promised to repay the loan within eight months. Later on, Alina was unable to repay the full amount of RM5,000 and could only afford to pay RM3,000. Baba then agreed to accept RM3,000 from Alina in full settlement of the debt after getting to know that Alina’s husband had just passed away in a car accident and Alina is in difficulty managing her finances. Alina promptly paid the amount of RM3,000 to Baba. However, Alina was shocked when she received an email from Baba last week requesting the balance of the loan, amounting to RM2,000.
Advise Alina on the validity of Baba’s claim for the balance of RM2,000.
Answer:
Based on the information provided, it appears that Baba and Alina had a verbal agreement for a loan of RM5,000 with a repayment period of eight months. When Alina was unable to repay the full amount, Baba agreed to accept RM3,000 in full settlement of the debt. This agreement, known as a "novation," effectively replaces the original loan agreement with a new agreement in which the outstanding balance of RM2,000 is forgiven.
Once the RM3,000 was paid by Alina, the debt is considered as fully discharged and Baba cannot claim the remaining balance of RM2,000. Alina can show the email or other evidence of the agreement to forgive the remaining balance as proof that the debt has been fully settled.
It's important to note that the above information is based on the facts provided and it is always best to consult a licensed attorney for legal advice.
Explanation:
out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks
What does it mean that "out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks" (Luke 6:45)?
The words a person speaks reflect the true nature of their heart and reveal their inner thoughts and intentions.
Luke 6:45 contains the biblical proverb "out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks." It implies that a person's words are a reflection of their innermost thoughts or feelings. It implies that a person's words will eventually reflect the ideas, emotions and intentions that reside in their heart.
In other words one's true character, values and beliefs are revealed by what they say. This verse exhorts people to pay attention to their inner thoughts and attitudes because they ultimately influence their words and deeds. It emphasizes how crucial it is to develop a good and virtuous heart in order to speak positively and inspiringly.
learn more about verse here
brainly.com/question/3841005
#SPJ2
Which factors most likely contributed to the change on this graph? Check all that apply. more women moving into the workforce a decrease in the number of marriages an increase in the number of marriages greater access to birth control methods advancement in equal rights for women the pursuit of traditional gender roles
in the united states, what recourse does an accused person have if he cannot afford a private defense attorney?
Under the UCC, if a court deems a contract (or a clause) to have been unconscionable at the time it was made, the court can do any of the following
An unconscionable bargain would, therefore, be one which is irreconcilable with what is right or reasonable. If a contract or term thereof is unconscionable at the time the contract is made, the Court may refuse to enforce the contract.
A court is a person natural or legal charged with adjudicating conflicts between parties and upholding the law in civil, criminal, and administrative cases. In both common and civil law systems, courts serve as the principal conflict resolution tool, and it is frequently believed that anybody can file a lawsuit.
Similar to this, persons charged with crimes have the chance to defend themselves in court. In addition, the presiding official or authorities, typically one or more judges, are referred to as "the court."
To know more about Court here-
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
As set forth by Regulation Z, before enforcing an acceleration clause that appears as part of the mortgage, lenders must wait until payments are delinquent at least how many days.
In a home loan contract, a "speed increase statement" is an arrangement that allows the moneylender to request that the borrower reimburse the whole credit after a default. A "speed increase condition" in a home loan or deed of trust permits the moneylender or current credit holder.
Pyramiding late expenses allude to a loan boss' act of forcing a late charge when a purchaser sends a convenient installment in a sum adequate to cover the consistently planned installment however deficient to cover an earlier neglected late or misconduct expense.
TILA advances the educated use regarding purchaser credit by requiring convenient revelation of its expenses. It additionally incorporates considerable arrangements, for example, the purchaser's right of rescission on specific home loan advances and the convenient goal of charging questions.
To learn more about Regulation here
https://brainly.com/question/14955878
#SPJ4
Upon completion of the inspection of each platoon, on which command does the platoon commander move by the most direct route and takes his/her post six paces in front of the center of his/her platoon?
Upon completion of the inspection of each platoon, on MARCH command the platoon commander move by the most direct route and takes his/her post six paces in front of the center of his/her platoon
The company commander orders "PREPARE FOR INSPECTION" when it is time to start an inspection. The platoon commanders open ranks according to platoons at this command. The first action is carried out by the right platoon.
Mark time and march is the order. When marching, the word "March" is commanded as soon as either foot hits the ground. You move your right (or left) foot forward 30 inches more. After that, you place your trailing foot so that both heels are parallel.
The two different sorts of marching instructions include: (1) The preliminary command, which describes the action to be taken and mentally readies the cadet for it. The antecedent command is Forward in the command Forward, MARCH.
(2) The command of execution specifies the timing of the movement.
For more questions on MARCH command
https://brainly.com/question/21404791
#SPJ4
Hegemony is one of two aspects of power described by Italian political philosopher Antonio Gramsci. Which of the following situations is an example of hegemony
Hegemony is one of two aspects of power described by Italian political philosopher Antonio Gramsci.
Hegemony refers to the ability of a dominant group or class to maintain power and control over society by gaining the consent and cooperation of other groups and classes. It is the process by which the dominant group imposes its ideas, values, and beliefs on the rest of society, creating a sense of normalcy and common sense around its own interests and agenda.
An example of hegemony would be the cultural and ideological dominance of a capitalist system, where the ideas and values of capitalism are accepted and embraced by the majority of society, even by those who may not benefit directly from it. This leads to the acceptance of capitalist economic and political systems as the norm, and any alternative ideas or values are marginalized or dismissed.
Learn more about Hegemony here:
https://brainly.com/question/29999497
#SPJ4
Summarize the findings of the Knapp Commission (1972), including the types of corruption associated with the “grass-eaters” and the “meat-eaters” in police culture
Answer:
The Knapp Commission was a commission established by Mayor John Lindsay in New York City in 1970 to investigate corruption within the New York City Police Department. The commission's findings, released in 1972, revealed a culture of corruption within the NYPD, divided into two categories: "grass-eaters" and "meat-eaters." Grass-eaters were officers who accepted small gratuities, such as free meals, in exchange for minor favors, while meat-eaters were officers who were actively engaged in more serious criminal activities, such as bribery and extortion. The commission also found that the police department had an inadequate system of oversight and accountability and recommended a series of reforms to address the issues it identified.
Explanation:
a(n) decides civil disputes that involve small amounts of money and other minor criminal cases or specialized matters?
Preliminary courts of restricted purview represent considerable authority in minor lawbreakers and common cases.
Judgment: A court choice. Likewise called a pronouncement or a request. Judgment Document: An extremely durable court record of the court's last demeanor of the case.
Region courts are the most reduced level in the government framework. They have a unique purview — they hear cases interestingly — for criminal and common cases.
Legal disputes that include questions between individuals or organizations over cash or a physical issue to individual privileges are classified as "common" cases. A common case for the most part starts when one individual or business (called the "offended party") cases to have been hurt by the activities of someone else or business (called the "respondent").
To learn more about criminal cases here
https://brainly.com/question/13391617
#SPJ4
Under Article 10 of Federal Constitution provides for the right of freedom of speech, assembly, and association. Discuss on the situation where an individual loss these rights.
Answer:
Article 10 of the Federal Constitution provides for the right of freedom of speech, assembly, and association, which are considered fundamental rights and are essential for a functioning democracy. However, these rights may be restricted in certain circumstances to ensure the protection of national security, public order, or morality.
In certain situations, an individual may lose their right to freedom of speech, assembly, and association, if they are found to have used these rights to incite violence, spread hate speech, or engage in activities that threaten national security. For example, if an individual is found to have made statements or engaged in actions that incite racial or religious hatred, they may face legal repercussions and lose their right to freedom of speech.
Additionally, the government may also impose restrictions on the freedom of assembly and association during a state of emergency or to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. In such cases, the government may prohibit public gatherings and ban certain organizations deemed to be a threat to national security.
In situations where an individual's rights have been restricted, it is important to ensure that the restrictions are necessary and proportionate to the threat posed, and that the individual has the right to appeal the decision. Any restriction on rights must also be done in accordance with the rule of law and in compliance with international human rights standards.
In the Duma there are 1600 delegates, who have formed 16000 committees of 80 people each. Prove that one can find two committees having no fewer than four common members.
The concept here is the Pigeon-hole principle, which states that if n items are put into m containers, with n > m, then at least one container must contain more than one item.
The pigeon hole principle is one of the simplest but most useful ideas in mathematics and can save us here. There are 16,000 committees, each with 80 members. So in all committees, there are 1,280,000 different committee members.
Since there are only 1,600 people and 1,280,000 members, at least one committee member (let's call him Bob) is on at least 800 committees. But as with the classics, we end up with a contradiction. Suppose no commission pair has four members in common, so at most 3.
Check out the 800+ committees Bob serves on. Besides Bob, each of Bob's committees has at most 2 people in common. Bob's first committee has 79 other people. His second committee has at least 77 other people (because maybe 2 have already been counted). In the third at least 75 and so on.
According to Bob's 40th committee, we say that there are at least 79+77+75+...+1 people besides Bob.
But 1+2+3+…+79=80⋅79/2=40⋅79, and 2+4+6+…+78=2(1+2+3+…+39)=2(39⋅40/2)=39⋅40.
So 1+3+5+…+79=40×79−40×39=40×40=1600, so there are at least 1600 people on Bob's committees besides Bob! It's impossible because there are only 1600 people! We have reached our contradiction and finished the proof.
To know more about the Pigeon-hole principle,
brainly.com/question/29889928
#SPJ4
he has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. meaning
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. This statement is referring to a situation in which a leader (such as a president or king) has refused to approve or give their consent to laws that are deemed beneficial and essential for the well-being of the general public.
This implies that the leader's actions are blocking the passage of important laws that would improve the lives of citizens. This can also imply that the person in authority is not fulfilling their duty and responsibilities toward the work he or she is supposed to be doing for the citizens.
Learn more about the refusal of assent to necessary and beneficial laws for the public good. here: https://brainly.com/question/2601337
#SPJ4
