Answer:
B
Explanation:
Article III, Section 2 of the US Constitution defines the jurisdiction of the federal courts, including the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts. Specifically, the federal courts hold jurisdiction over:
1.Cases that arise under the Constitution, federal laws, or treaties of the United States.
2.Cases involving ambassadors, public ministers, or consuls.
3.Cases in which the United States is a party.
4.Cases between two or more states, or between a state and citizens of another state, or between citizens of different states.
5.Cases between a state or its citizens and foreign countries or their citizens or subjects.
6.Cases involving admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.
7.Cases in which the federal government has a direct interest, such as disputes between federal agencies or challenges to federal regulations.
This jurisdictional framework is a key aspect of the US federal legal system, and it helps to define the respective roles and powers of the federal and state governments.
According to Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, over which cases would federal courts hold jurisdictionB. disputes between citizens of different states
What Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, over which cases would federal courts hold jurisdictionAccording to Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, federal courts hold jurisdiction over cases involving:
- Controversies between two or more states
- Controversies between a state and citizens of another state
- Controversies between citizens of different states
- Controversies between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states
- Controversies between a state or its citizens and foreign states, citizens, or subjects
So, option B is correct: Federal courts would hold jurisdiction over disputes between citizens of different states.
Learn more about Federal courts at https://brainly.com/question/29619376
#SPJ2
hello I'm looking for someone who will do my edge projects/essays, and I will pay you !!! so please shoot me with your offers! these are junior/senior classes!
!!(Psychology)!!
What did Harlow’s studies tell us about fathers, how children should be treated in institutionalized settings, and adults with high levels of self-confidence?
Harlow's studies were performed by psychologist Harry Harlow in the 1950s and 60s, and they focused on the importance of social and emotional contact in the development of primates, including humans.
What is Harlow's Studies?
Harlow's most famous studies involved separating baby rhesus monkeys from their mothers and raising them with "surrogate mothers" made of either wire mesh or terry cloth.
The results of these studies showed that the baby monkeys preferred the comfort and warmth of the terry cloth mother, even when it did not provide food, over the wire mesh mother, which did provide food.
This demonstrated that social and emotional contact was more important to the monkeys' development and well-being than physical nourishment.
These findings had important implications for how children should be treated in institutionalized settings, such as orphanages and other care facilities.
Harlow's research showed that simple provision of food, shelter, and basic care was not enough to meet the emotional and social needs of young children.
Instead, it was necessary to provide them with consistent, nurturing relationships and emotional support in order to foster healthy development.
In summary, Harlow's studies emphasized the importance of social and emotional contact for healthy development and well-being, and provided important insights into how children should be treated in institutionalized settings and how early experiences can shape the development of self-confidence in adulthood.
To know more about psychology, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28262388
#SPJ1
