polarity is a condition in which opposite ends of a molecule have slightly diffrent charges but overall is

True. As a star begins to evolve away from the main sequence, it does indeed get larger.

This stage of stellar evolution is known as the red giant phase. When a star exhausts its hydrogen fuel in its core, the core contracts and heats up while the outer layers of the star expand.

This expansion causes the star to increase in size, making it larger than its initial size during the main sequence phase. The increase in size is primarily due to the higher luminosity and the redistribution of stellar material in the outer layers.

Eventually, stars like the Sun will evolve into red giants before undergoing further changes in their evolution.

Know more about red giant phase here

https://brainly.com/question/32089223#

#SPJ11

The length of the x-component of the vector shown below is 2.6. Therefore, option (B) is correct.

To determine the length of the x-component of the vector, we need to find the cosine of the given angle and multiply it by the length of the y-component.

The length of the x-component can be calculated as follows:

x-component = length of y-component * cos(angle)

Given that the length of the y-component is 8 and the angle is 71 degrees, we can substitute these values into the equation:

x-component = 8 * cos(71)

Using a calculator or trigonometric tables, we find that cos(71 degrees) is approximately 0.342.

Therefore, the length of the x-component is:

x-component = 8 * 0.342 ≈ 2.736

Learn more about vector, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ1

The magnetic flux through the square would be 4.0 Weber if the strength of the magnetic field is 1.0 Tesla.

To calculate the magnetic flux through the square made by the conducting wire, we first need to know the strength of the magnetic field. Without that information, we cannot determine the magnetic flux.
Assuming we have the information about the strength of the magnetic field, we can proceed to calculate the magnetic flux. The formula to calculate magnetic flux is:
Magnetic Flux = Magnetic Field x Area x Cosine of the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the area.
In this case, the area of the square is 4.0 m² (2.0 m x 2.0 m). Since the magnetic field is uniform, it has the same strength throughout the square. Therefore, we can simplify the formula to:
Magnetic Flux = Magnetic Field x Area
If we plug in the values for the area and the strength of the magnetic field, we can calculate the magnetic flux.
For example, if the strength of the magnetic field is 1.0 Tesla, then the magnetic flux through the square would be:
Magnetic Flux = 1.0 T x 4.0 m² = 4.0 Weber
Therefore, the magnetic flux through the square would be 4.0 Weber if the strength of the magnetic field is 1.0 Tesla.

To know more about magnetic flux visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1596988
#SPJ11

The answer to this question is D. Pluto having a comet-like composition and density does not necessarily lend support to the idea that it is a Kuiper-Belt object.

While many Kuiper-Belt objects are believed to have similar compositions to comets, not all of them do. Additionally, density alone is not a definitive characteristic of Kuiper-Belt objects. Some Kuiper-Belt objects are believed to be quite dense, while others are much less so.
On the other hand, the other answer choices all provide evidence that Pluto is indeed a Kuiper-Belt object. A number of Kuiper-Belt objects are known to have their own moons, just like Pluto does. Pluto's eccentric orbit is also a characteristic shared by many Kuiper-Belt objects. Additionally, while Pluto is smaller than many known comets, this is not an unusual characteristic for a Kuiper-Belt object. Finally, some known Kuiper-Belt objects are indeed hundreds of kilometers across, which is similar in size to Pluto.
Overall, while there are certainly some differences between Pluto and other Kuiper-Belt objects, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the idea that Pluto is part of this group of objects beyond Neptune.

To know more about Kuiper-Belt object visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16285206

#SPJ11

True. Hubble's law, which states that the recessional velocity of a galaxy is proportional to its distance from Earth, can be used to determine the distance to faraway galaxies.

By measuring the redshift of light emitted by galaxies, astronomers can calculate their recession velocity, and from there, use Hubble's law to calculate their distance from Earth. This has allowed us to estimate the size and age of the observable universe, and to study the large-scale structure of the cosmos.

To know more about Hubble's law click this link -

brainly.com/question/29869676

#SPJ11

The color you see is "The color reflected by the object.". The correct option is C.

The correct option is C because the color we see is determined by the wavelengths of light that are reflected by an object. When light falls on an object, it interacts with its surface. The object absorbs certain wavelengths of light and reflects others. The color that we perceive is the color of light that is reflected by the object and reaches our eyes.

The explanation for why the other options are not true:

A. The color that mixes with white light: White light is a combination of all visible colors. When an object appears white, it means that it reflects all colors of light, rather than mixing with them.

B. The color that is absorbed by the object: The color that is absorbed by an object is not the color we see because the absorbed light energy is not reflected back to our eyes. It is the colors that are not absorbed that are reflected and contribute to the color we perceive.

D. The color that is not taken by black light: Black light refers to ultraviolet light that is not visible to the human eye. It does not directly relate to the color we see. The absence of light or the absence of reflection from an object in black light conditions may lead to a lack of color perception, but it does not define the color we see under normal lighting conditions.

Therefore, the correct answer is option C.

To learn more about laws of reflection click:

brainly.com/question/13101215

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Friction=coefficient of kinetic Friction ×normal force.In this case the normal force is equal to mg.You going to say mg×coefficient of kinetic Friction you will get Frictional force. Use the Frictional force to calculate work done by friction you get -3.92J.Then you can say the work done on the object by friction is 3.92J.

Radio waves have the longest wavelength and low frequencies and energy as compared to the other types of electromagnetic radiation.

Electromagnetic radiation are travel in the form of waves in a vacuum. Electromagnetic radiation consists of radio waves, microwaves, IR rays, Visible rays, Ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and Gamma rays. These rays are ranges from longest to shortest wavelength.

The wavelength is inversely proportional to the frequency. The shortest wavelength has a high frequency and the longest wavelength have a low frequency. High frequency has high energy and low frequency has low energy.

Thus, radio waves have the longest wavelength compared to the other radiations.

To learn more about Electromagnetic radiation:

https://brainly.com/question/10759891

#SPJ1

If a real object is placed in front of a negative lens, the lens will form a virtual image that is located on the same side of the lens as the object. The image will be upright and smaller than the object.

In order to determine the position of the virtual image formed by the negative lens, we can use the thin lens equation:

1/f = 1/do + 1/di

where f is the focal length of the lens, do is the distance of the object from the lens, and di is the distance of the image from the lens.

When the negative lens is on the bench and the light source is moved to different positions, the lens forms a virtual image of the light source on the same side of the lens as the object. By measuring the distance between the lens and the light source, we can calculate the distance of the virtual image from the lens using the thin lens equation.

If we repeat this process for multiple positions of the light source, we can determine the location of the virtual image for each position. If the virtual image location is found to be identical to the current position of the light source, it means that the light source is located at the position of the virtual image formed by the lens. This indicates that the light rays passing through the lens are diverging and producing a virtual image that appears to be coming from the same location as the actual light source.

Learn more about negative lens, here:

https://brainly.com/question/6986186

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the impulse on the ball from the floor is equal to the change in momentum, which is 12 kg*m/s.

The impulse on the ball from the floor can be calculated using the impulse-momentum theorem, which states that the change in momentum of an object is equal to the impulse applied to it. The momentum of the ball just before striking the floor can be calculated as momentum = mass x velocity = 3 kg x 7 m/s = 21 kg*m/s. The momentum of the ball just after rebounding can be calculated as momentum = mass x velocity = 3 kg x 3 m/s = 9 kg*m/s. The change in momentum is therefore 21 kg*m/s - 9 kg*m/s = 12 kg*m/s. The magnitude of the impulse on the ball from the floor is equal to the change in momentum, which is 12 kg*m/s. The magnitude of the impulse on the ball from the floor is a measure of the force exerted on the ball by the floor during the collision. This force is determined by the duration of the collision and the rate at which the ball's momentum changes. A harder floor or a longer collision time would result in a larger impulse and a greater force on the ball. Understanding the impulse-momentum theorem is important in analyzing the behavior of objects in collisions, as it allows us to calculate the forces involved and make predictions about how the objects will move after the collision.

To know more about magnitude visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30395926

#SPJ11

The velocity of P-waves decreases when entering the outer core due to its liquid nature, and S-waves are unable to travel through the outer core, creating a shadow zone on the Earth's surface.

When p-waves enter the outer core, their velocity decreases significantly. This is because the outer core is made up of a liquid layer of molten iron and nickel, which is less dense than the solid rock of the Earth's mantle through which the p-waves travel. The decrease in velocity is approximately three times slower than in the mantle. On the other hand, s-waves cannot travel through liquids, and therefore, they are completely blocked by the outer core. This means that when s-waves encounter the outer core, they disappear and do not reach the other side of the Earth. This is the reason why seismologists use the absence of s-waves in certain regions to identify the presence of a liquid outer core.

When p-waves enter the outer core, their velocity decreases significantly, while s-waves cannot travel through liquids and are completely blocked by the outer core. When P-waves enter the outer core, their velocity generally decreases due to the outer core's liquid nature. The decrease in velocity is because the particles in a liquid are less tightly packed than in a solid, making it harder for the P-waves to travel quickly.

To know more about velocity visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/14343871

#SPJ11

If the value of the Hubble constant were 700 km/s/Mpc, it would imply a younger age for our universe. The Hubble constant represents the rate of the universe's expansion, and a higher value corresponds to a faster expansion. By using the reciprocal of the Hubble constant, we can estimate the age of the universe. In this hypothetical scenario, the age of our universe would be approximately 1.4 billion years, indicating a relatively young age compared to the current estimate of around 13.8 billion years.

The Hubble constant (H0) is linked to the age of the universe through Hubble's law, which states that the recessional velocity of galaxies is proportional to their distance. Mathematically, we have v = H0 * d, where v is the recessional velocity and d is the distance.

To estimate the age of the universe (T), we can take the reciprocal of the Hubble constant: T = 1/H0. In this hypothetical scenario with a Hubble constant of 700 km/s/Mpc, the inverse of this value would give us an approximate age of 1.4 billion years (1/700 km/s/Mpc = 1.4 billion years).

It is important to note that the actual age of the universe is estimated to be around 13.8 billion years based on various observations and measurements. Therefore, a Hubble constant of 700 km/s/Mpc would imply a significantly younger age for our universe compared to the current scientific consensus.

learn more about hubble constant here:brainly.com/question/32399883

#SPJ11

True. The absolute magnitude of a star is a measure of its intrinsic brightness, while the apparent magnitude is a measure of its brightness as observed from Earth.

By comparing the apparent magnitude of a star to its absolute magnitude, astronomers can determine the distance to the star.

The relationship between absolute magnitude, apparent magnitude, and distance is described by the inverse square law.

This law states that the apparent brightness of a star decreases with distance squared. By knowing the absolute magnitude of a star and measuring its apparent magnitude, astronomers can use the inverse square law to calculate the star's distance.

However, it is important to note that there are other factors that can affect a star's apparent magnitude, such as interstellar dust and the star's motion through space.

These factors must be taken into account when using the absolute and apparent magnitude to calculate a star's distance.

To know more about absolute  refer here

brainly.com/question/17360689#

#SPJ11

An object with many molecules has more energy than an object with few molecules.

In general, an object with many molecules will have more energy than an object with few molecules. This is because energy is related to the motion of particles, and an object with more particles will have more motion and therefore more energy.
The energy of an object is determined by its internal kinetic energy, which is the sum of the kinetic energies of all its particles. When an object has more particles, there are more collisions between particles, which increases the overall kinetic energy of the system. This is why a larger object will typically have more energy than a smaller one.
Additionally, an object with more molecules will have a higher temperature, which is also related to its internal energy. Temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the particles in a substance, so a substance with more particles will have a higher temperature and therefore more energy.
Overall, it is safe to say that an object with many molecules has more energy than an object with few molecules. However, there may be exceptions to this rule depending on the specific properties of the objects in question.

for more such question on energy

https://brainly.com/question/30532156

#SPJ11

The acceleration of the person given that his or her speed increases by 70 miles per hour in 10 seconds is 3.129 meters per second square

First, we shall convert 70 miles per hour to meters per second. This is shown below:

1 miles per hour = 0.44704 meters per second

Therefore,

70 miles per hour = 70 × 0.44704

70 miles per hour = 31.29 meters per second

Finally, we shall determine the acceleration of the person. Details below:

Acceleration = Change in velocity  / time

Acceleration = 31.29 meters per second / 10 seconds

Acceleration = 3.129 meters per second square

Learn more about acceleration:

https://brainly.com/question/491732

#SPJ1

Calculate the minimum kinetic energy needed for the target to reach the horizontal position against the force of gravity and the magnetic force. The minimum velocity of the ball (va)1min required to achieve this outcome.

We need to consider the relationship between the velocity of the ball and the force required to swing the target into a horizontal position. This can be calculated using the formula: F = ma
where F is the force required, m is the mass of the target, and a is the acceleration caused by the ball hitting the target.
Assuming that the magnet can hold the target in place once it swings into a horizontal position, we can determine the minimum velocity (va)1min required by setting the force required equal to the magnetic force holding the target in place.
This can be expressed as: F = BIL
where B is the magnetic field strength, I is the current passing through the magnet, and L is the length of the target.
By equating these two forces, we can solve for (va)1min :
ma = BIL
(va)1min = sqrt(BIL/m)

The minimum velocity required to swing the target into a horizontal position can be calculated using the above equation. To determine the minimum velocity (va)1min of the ball required to swing the target into a horizontal position, three factors need to be considered: the mass of the ball, the mass of the target, and the force exerted by the magnet.
Analyze the energy and momentum involved in the collision between the ball and the target. The ball's kinetic energy before impact must be sufficient to overcome the target's rotational energy and gravitational potential energy after the collision.

To know more about kinetic energy visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/30572063

#SPJ11

The force constant of the spring is 950 N/m. We can use the formula for calculating the potential energy stored in a spring: U = 1/2 kx^2. Where U is the potential energy, k is the force constant, and x is the displacement of the spring from its natural length. We can use the given information to find the force constant of the spring.

We need to find the displacement of the spring:

x = 3 m - 1 m
x = 2 m
Next, we can use the formula for work to find the potential energy stored in the spring:
W = Fd
1900 j = F(2 m)
Solving for the force, F:
F = 950 N
Now, we can use the formula for potential energy to find the force constant:
U = 1/2 kx^2
1900 j = 1/2 k(2 m)^2
Solving for k:
k = 475 N/m
So, the force constant of the spring is 475 N/m.

The force constant of the spring, we'll use Hooke's Law, which states that the force required to stretch or compress a spring is proportional to the displacement from its natural length. The equation for Hooke's Law is F = kx, where F is the force, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement. In this case, the work done (1900 J) can be calculated using the equation W = 0.5 * k * x^2. We are given the work (W = 1900 J) and the displacement (x = 3 m - 1 m = 2 m). Plugging these values into the equation, we get:
1900 = 0.5 * k * (2^2)
Now, we can solve for the spring constant, k:
1900 = 2k
k = 950 N/m

To know more about force visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29787329

#SPJ11

Vapor locks can cause a variety of issues in a vehicle.

When vapor lock occurs, it can lead to the engine running roughly or even stalling. This happens because the fuel vaporizes before it reaches the engine, causing a lack of fuel and thus a lack of power. Additionally, vapor lock can cause the power steering and brake fluid to evaporate, leading to a loss of control over the vehicle's steering and brakes. The vehicle's interior may also become steamy as the vapor remains trapped inside. To prevent vapor lock from occurring, it's important to ensure that the vehicle's fuel system is functioning properly and that there is adequate ventilation to prevent the buildup of excess heat and pressure.

To know more about vapor lock visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4214914

#SPJ11

The schedule that is not an intermittent schedule is FR 1.

Intermittent schedules of reinforcement involve reinforcing a behavior only some of the time, rather than every time it occurs. This type of reinforcement schedule is often used in behavior modification and can result in more persistent and resistant behavior.

The four reinforcement schedules mentioned in the question are:

Fixed Ratio (FR): Reinforcement is delivered after a fixed number of responses.

Variable Ratio (VR): Reinforcement is delivered after a variable number of responses.

Fixed Interval (FI): Reinforcement is delivered for the first response after a fixed interval of time has elapsed.

Variable Interval (VI): Reinforcement is delivered for the first response after a variable interval of time has elapsed.

Out of these four schedules, FR 1 is not an intermittent schedule because it involves reinforcing a behavior after every single occurrence. In other words, it is a continuous schedule of reinforcement.

FR 1 involves reinforcing a behavior after a fixed number of responses, where the number is one. This means that every time the behavior occurs, it is immediately followed by reinforcement, which is not intermittent. The other schedules involve some degree of variability in the number or timing of responses required for reinforcement, making them intermittent schedules.

Learn more about intermittent schedule  

brainly.com/question/30329122

#SPJ11

Answer: 8400 J

Explanation:

Q = mcT (Q is heat, m is mass, c is specific heat capacity, and T is change in temperature)

200 g = 0.2 kg

Difference in two temperatures written in Celsius is the same as the difference in the same two temperatures written in Kelvin. Kelvin just has a different value for starting at absolute zero.

Q = 0.2*2090*(-20-0) = -8360 J

This means that 8360 J of energy must be removed. Writing the answer to two significant figures makes the answer 8400 J.

Explanation:

To find the density of the mixture, we need to first find the total mass and volume of the mixture.

The mass of 60 cm³ of milk can be found using its density:

mass of milk = volume of milk x density of milk

mass of milk = 60 cm³ x 1.04 g/cm³

mass of milk = 62.4 g

Similarly, the mass of 20 cm³ of water can be found using its density:

mass of water = volume of water x density of water

mass of water = 20 cm³ x 1.0 g/cm³

mass of water = 20 g

The total mass of the mixture is:

total mass = mass of milk + mass of water

total mass = 62.4 g + 20 g

total mass = 82.4 g

The total volume of the mixture is:

total volume = volume of milk + volume of water

total volume = 60 cm³ + 20 cm³

total volume = 80 cm³

The density of the mixture is:

density = total mass/total volume

density = 82.4 g/80 cm³

density = 1.03 g/cm³ (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the density of the mixture is 1.03 g/cm³.

The electric field strength between the plates is 1,000,000 V/m.

To find the electric field strength between the plates, we need to use the following equation:

Electric field strength (E) = Voltage (V) / Distance (d)

A doubly charged ion accelerated to 30.0 keV means that it has gained 30.0 kilo-electron volts (keV) of energy, which is equal to 30,000 electron volts (eV).

Since it is doubly charged, the voltage across the plates would be half of the gained energy, so:

Voltage (V) = 30,000 eV / 2 = 15,000 eV

The distance between the plates (d) is given as 1.50 cm, which should be converted to meters:

Distance (d) = 1.50 cm * (1 m / 100 cm) = 0.015 m

Now, apply the electric field strength equation:

E = 15,000 V / 0.015 m = 1,000,000 V/m

Learn more about electric field at https://brainly.com/question/29567363

#SPJ11

The order of increasing energy from lowest to highest for the given options of electromagnetic radiation is d, which represents microwaves.

Electromagnetic radiations are a form of energy that travels through space in the form of waves. These waves are made up of oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which move perpendicular to each other. The different types of electromagnetic radiation are distinguished by their wavelengths and frequencies, which determine their energy levels. The radiations listed in the question are all forms of electromagnetic radiation.

Out of the given options, the correct order of increasing energy from lowest to highest is option d, which represents microwaves. Microwaves have longer wavelengths and lower frequencies, which means they carry less energy than other forms of electromagnetic radiation. They are commonly used in communication technologies and in household appliances like microwave ovens.

In comparison, visible light has higher energy levels than microwaves and is responsible for our sense of sight. Ultraviolet (UV) light has even higher energy levels and can be harmful to living organisms if they are exposed to it for extended periods. IR light has the second-highest energy levels after visible light and is commonly used in thermal imaging and remote sensing technologies.

To know more about Electromagnetic radiation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29646884

#SPJ11

After being funneled by the auricle, sound waves pass (in sequence) through the external auditory canal, the tympanic membrane, the ossicles (malleus, incus, stapes), the oval window, the cochlea, and the auditory nerve.

The external auditory canal is a tube-like structure that carries sound waves from the auricle to the eardrum or tympanic membrane. The tympanic membrane vibrates in response to the sound waves and transmits the vibrations to the ossicles, a chain of three small bones in the middle ear. The malleus, incus, and stapes amplify the vibrations and transmit them to the oval window, a membrane that separates the middle and inner ear.

The auricle (or pinna) captures and funnels sound waves into the external auditory canal. These sound waves travel down the canal and reach the tympanic membrane, causing it to vibrate. The vibrations from the tympanic membrane are transferred to the ossicles, which consist of the malleus, incus, and stapes bones. These bones amplify the vibrations and send them to the oval window, which is the entrance to the inner ear. From there, the vibrations continue through the cochlea, where they are converted into electrical signals that the brain interprets as sound.

To know more about sound waves visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1554319

#SPJ11

The magnetic field at a distance of 4 cm from the wire is 1 μT.  The magnetic field produced by a current-carrying wire decreases with increasing distance from the wire.

This is because the magnetic field strength is inversely proportional to the distance from the wire. The formula for the magnetic field strength at a distance from a current-carrying wire is given by:

B = (μ0 I)/(2πr)

Where B is the magnetic field strength, I is the current in the wire, r is the distance from the wire, and μ0 is the magnetic constant. This formula shows that the magnetic field strength is directly proportional to the current in the wire and inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.

In the given problem, the magnetic field at a distance of 2 cm from the wire is 4 μT. We can use the above formula to find the current in the wire:

4 μT = (4π × 10-7 T·m/A) × I / (2π × 0.02 m)

I = (4 μT × 2 × 0.02 m) / (4π × 10-7 T·m/A)

I = 1.6 × 10-3 A or 1.6 mA

Therefore, the current in the wire is 1.6 mA. To find the magnetic field at a distance of 4 cm from the wire, we can use the same formula:

B = (μ0 I)/(2πr) = (4π × 10-7 T·m/A) × 1.6 × 10-3 A / (2π × 0.04 m) = 1 μT

Hence, the magnetic field at a distance of 4 cm from the wire is 1 μT.

Learn more about magnetic field here:

https://brainly.com/question/30331791

#SPJ11

There was more erosion taking place in 2004 than deposition.

In 2004, a major setback had taken place with regards to shoreline erosion and little of deposition. The cause? The Indian Ocean tsunami which struck multiple countries within the area leaving a trail of destruction and change behind.

Its fierce waves proved potent enough to erode beaches, dunes as well as cliffs, so much so that it consumed entire islands along its path. The outcomes were catastrophic on both ecological and societal fronts for those living in afflicted locales.

Learn about The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami here https://brainly.com/question/2451055

#SPJ1

The electric force between two charged particles varies as 1/r, is much, much greater than the attractive gravitational force, depends only on the magnitudes of the charges, and is repulsive for unlike charges.

Coulomb's Law, which states that the force is proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This results in the force varying as 1/r, where r is the distance between the charges. The electric force is much, much greater than the attractive gravitational force between the particles because the electric force is carried by photons, which have a much greater range and strength than the gravitons that carry the gravitational force.

The electric force is significantly stronger than the gravitational force between particles, with a ratio of about 10^36 times greater. The electric force depends only on the magnitudes of the charges involved and the distance between them, not on the masses of the particles or their velocities. The electric force is repulsive for unlike charges, meaning that two charges of opposite signs will repel each other, while charges of the same sign will attract each other.

To know more about magnitudes visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31022175

#SPJ11

The current in the primary is (A) 0.75 A. The transformer equation relates the voltages and turns ratios of the primary and secondary coils of a transformer.

In an ideal transformer, this equation is given by:

Vp / Vs = Np / Ns

where Vp and Vs are the voltages across the primary and secondary coils, and Np and Ns are the number of turns in the primary and secondary coils, respectively.

Since the transformer is ideal, the power output must equal the power input, which means that the product of the current and voltage in the primary coil must equal the product of the current and voltage in the secondary coil. Mathematically:

Ip * Vp = Is * Vs

We are given that the secondary current Is is 3.0 A, and the turns ratio Np/Ns is 500/2000 = 1/4. Using these values, we can solve for the primary current Ip:

Ip * Vp = Is * Vs

Ip * Vp = 3.0 A * Vp / 4

Ip = 3.0 A / 4

Ip = 0.75 A

Therefore, the answer is (A) 0.75 A.

Learn more about current here:

https://brainly.com/question/2285102

#SPJ11

The final form that a star takes when it dies depends on its mass. For a star with a mass similar to that of the Sun, it will eventually exhaust the nuclear fuel in its core and evolve into a red giant star, expanding to hundreds of times its original size. After the red giant phase, the outer layers of the star will be expelled into space in a process called a planetary nebula, leaving behind a hot, dense core called a white dwarf.

For more massive stars, the final stages of their evolution can include supernova explosions, leaving behind a neutron star or a black hole. The exact details of a star's evolution and final form depend on its mass and other properties, such as its metallicity and rotation rate.

In summary, a star that is 10 billion years old may eventually become a red giant and then a white dwarf, but the exact fate of the star depends on its mass and other properties.

To know more about Sun click this link -

brainly.com/question/31998244

#SPJ11

The correct steps for the synthesis of fibronectin are D E B and A

The extracellular matrix (ECM) component fibronectin (FBN) plays a crucial role in the interaction between the intracellular and extracellular environments by attaching to integrin receptors on the cell surface. This regulates the behaviour of the cell.

As a protein, fibronectin goes through certain common stages in the synthesis process with other proteins. To make mRNA, the DNA must first be translated into mRNA, which is then translated in the ribosomes. Here, the translated mRNA causes the amino acids to line up in a chain, and this chain is what we refer to as a protein. Fibronectin is then created as a last step.

Read more about fibronectin on:

https://brainly.com/question/31438380

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Fibronectin is a protein produced by cells in the liver. One function of fibronectin is forming blood clots to heal wounds.Order the steps that take place in the synthesis of fibronectin.

A. Fibronectin is produced.

B. Bonds are formed between the amino acids.

C. Amino acids bond to the DNA.

D. DNA is transcribed to produce mRNA.

E. Amino acids line up in order.